Sheriff Joe Goode: I fucked up somehow with my niece and need to make it up to her.
Also Joe Goode: I should get her a present. Women like presents! Wait, what do the kids like these days?
Sheriff Joe: You, useless annoyance who is dating my niece, be useful for one in your life and answer my question.
Kevin Kaminski: Uh, sure, but FYI, we broke up ‘cause I’m heading to Stanford and she’s going to Parsons...
Sheriff Joe: I am not sure whether to be pleased or pissed off about this.
*scribbling down notes b/c I am going to finish this thing even if it kills me* Hey hon, do you think Sheriff Joe’s the kind of guy who would try to buy his way back into his niece’s good graces by getting Beatles concert tickets for her and her friends?
oooooooooooooooh now there's a question. Would he buy her something because he only understands transactional affection? YES. Would he hate the Beatles for being mop haired pansy hippies? ALSO YES.
Not sure which side would win out, but then again Joe has a Mighty Need to seem like the Beloved Sheriff and Smalltown Authority so would making sure there was a Beatles gig close enough to his podunk town with Satanic magics make him look both Cool to the Youths and like a Stalwart Leader Keeping The Peace to the Adults? Deffo Yes. So he would, on balance. The Beatles would have a miserable fucking time I am sure.
2 notes
·
View notes
Oof. Um. I really need to translate the next chapter out from a jumbled mess of disjointed notes.
Anyway…
Almost the first thing Samuel Goode does when he finally reaches Montreal in 1765, after securing room and board, is get himself baptized (properly, in the Roman Latin rite).
It is partly to keep to his cover story - a descendent of Maryland Catholics dispossessed and their faith outlawed - and mostly b/c he knows very well what’s waiting on the other side for him and his kin.
He manages to get a job as a clerk for the new British-led Canadian government, marries a local girl, and starts his own humble dynasty of functionaries and bureaucrats.
Sentence Challenge
A little challenge: pick out your favorite sentence that you've written recently. One sentence. No context. Tag some friends
Tagged by @trillgutterbug <3
It cracks open to reveal an interior bristling with blunt, faintly luminous blue crystals- the ideal shell for a growing Coenobita lapillus.
Subterranean hermit crabs? Living inside my geodes? It’s more likely than you think! :D
5 notes
·
View notes
The Grand Habit.
I wrote this years ago, and decided to repost it to Tumblr in case anyone is interested.
For 100 years, from the last decade of Louis XIV until the French Revolution, The Grand Habit, AKA, the Stiff Bodied Gown or the Robe de Cour, was THE most formal dress in all European Courts. It was designed by Louis XIV when, as a crotchety old man, he decided that the ladies of the court were far too casually dressed. It was, in the Grand Old Man Fashion, based on fashions from when he was young. (To compare, imagine Elizabeth II insisting everyone dress like its the 50’s.)
Louis XIV’s wife , Marie Therese, in the inspiration for Court Dress, in the 1660’s
The Grand Habit consisted of a bodice, or top, which had boning sewed in like a built in corset. There was also a very full skirt worn over hoops, sometimes drawn back to show a matching petticoat and a long train. It also had lace sleeves (called engageantes) that were detachable and attached to different dresses, as well as a lace edging around the neckline.
Detail of sleeve from a portrait of Archduchess Maria Christina
The Grand Habit HAD to be worn at court, except for the three days before the court traveled, when the women who were traveling were permitted to dress more casually. (Almost all did, to show that they were members of the inner circle.)
Pregnant women were also permitted to wear a looser, more comfortable dress, as long as their pregnancy was public knowledge. When Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette received the Venetian Ambassador during one of her pregnancies she made sure to apologize for not wearing the Grand Habit. If she hadn’t, there would have been a diplomatic incident.
Marie Antoniette in a Grand Habit
When Louis XIV reigned, he would send home any woman not wearing it. Madame, his sister in law, famously said that she wore only Court Dresses and Riding Habits.She said “At Versailles which is considered the royal residence, everyone who comes into the King’s presence, or into ours, must be in full Court dress. At Marly, Meudon, and Saint-Cloud, mantuas are worn, also for travelling. I find Court dress much more convenient than mantuas, which I can’t endure.”
Madame in one of the first Grand Habits
Mantuas were a less formal form of dress,which, while fully accepted in England for the most formal of occasions, was not tolerated by Louis.
M. Garsault in the 1769 Encyclopedia Description des Arts et Métiers, describes:
“The day the Lady is presented to the King and Queen, etc., the bodice, train and petticoat must be black: bit all the trimmings are of lace, net, etc. The upper arm, except at the top close to the shoulder where the black sleeve of the bodice is seen, is covered with two flounces of white lace, one below the other, to the elbow. Under the lower flounce there is a decorated band (bracelet noir, forme de pompons). There is also a border of white lace around the neck-line and under that a narrow black tippet (palatine) also decorated from neck to waist. The petticoat and bodice are decorated with puffs, all of which are made from net, lace, etc., also gold.”“When the day of presentation has passed, everything that was black is replaced by colored or gold material. This style of dress has long been worn and has remained unchanged until the present day for ceremonial wear.If the Lady to be presented is not able to endure the heavily boned bodice than she is allowed to wear a lighter one, covered with a mantilla, with the court train and petticoat. As the mantilla covers the upper arm the top lace flounce, which would not be seen, is omitted. The mantilla is made from any light material such as gauze, net, lace, etc.”
The Grand Habit was extremely expensive, and most noblewomen bought them second hand, especially the black dress worn the first time at court. After all, if you are going to invest all that money in a dress, you want it to be a color that you like.The skirt alone required between 20-25 yards of very expensive fabric. The top, or bodice, required another yard, plus loads of extremely valuable handmade lace. And then you had to pay a seamstress to sew it all together. And with materials that valuable, you were going to a really good seamstress who wasn’t going to mess it up. In 1787 a grand habit cost the equivalent of 2,000 days wages for a worker!
Infanta Maria Ana of Spain,
The Grand Habit was not as required in other countries as it was in France. Mantuas were considered acceptable court dress for all but the most formal occasions. However, a Grand Habit made of cloth of silver was the usual wedding gown for royal brides, from Marie Antoinette to Catherine the Great.
Princess Augusta, mother of King George III of England, in her wedding dress.
Though robe de cour were always made of rich fabrics, the bodices could be further ornamented with stomachers and jewelry (including jeweled stomachers). Queen Charlotte of the United Kingdom owned a famous diamond stomacher, which was fought over by her descendants.
Queen Charlotte, wearing the stomacher(with a mantua, not a robe de cour)
Brooches were also pinned all over the skirt. Some of Catherine the Great’s dress ornaments still exist today.
The shape of the skirt worn with the robe de cour had always changed with the fashions of the time, but the bodice, except for some very slight alterations in style, stayed mostly the same. (This is very much like The Russian Court dress a century later.) The only major change in the bodice style was a shift in the 1770’s and 1780’s from very low, scooped shoulder-baring necklines to slightly higher, squarer necklines that matched the current fashions
Elisabeth Christine, Holy Roman Empress. Portrait is before 1740
Marie Antoinette in the 1780’s. Notice the difference in neckline.
Anne Marie D'Orleans, Queen of Sardania, in 1720
The shape of robe de cour skirts, however, did change with current fashions. The first robe de cour were worn without hooped petticoats, as the panier did not become common in France until at least 1720. In the 1720’s robe de cour had relatively restrained, conical skirts.(see above). By the 1760’s the skirts become enormous, but very thin and rectangular:
By the 1780’s, the skirts were not as extreme and rectangular, but they were covered with all sorts of trimmings.
There were also regional differences in skirt shape. In the 1740’s-60’s the English tended to wear a very rectangular hoop. The French wore a hoop, that while just as wide at the hem, was more sloping and less square at the corners.
Anne, Princess Royal of the United Kingdom
The train of the robe de cour could be worn either from the shoulders or from the waist, though the latter was more common. The length of the train was an indication of status: the longer the train, the higher the rank of the wearer. The etiquette of train wearing varied from country to country. In England one held ones train up, draped over one arm, as a sign of respect. In France, despite the much-remarked upon filth of Versailles’ hallways, one wore one’s train down as a sign of respect.
Wedding dress of Sofia Magdalena of Sweden
It was extremely uncomfortable, and disliked by many women, especially Marie Antoinette. It was banned in France by the revolution, but held on in England until 1810, though it did look odd when women tried to wear them with the high wasted skirts of the Empire style.
Pictures and information were sourced from
The Dreamstress
,Grand Ladies
,Isis’s Wardrobe
,Regency World
, and others
.
46 notes
·
View notes
Oooh, I had a thought! If there’s ever a scene where three generations of Goode men are in the same room, assuming Ted’s the youngest and Ashley his dad or uncle, who would play the eldest?
So I'm hearing rumors that they're continuing the Fear Street movies, but I think those movies are about the other killers though. Like these movies are spinoff movies for the other killers. Because I've heard one of the movies is about the Milk Man. But these are just rumors.
I don't know who true that is yet.
But if the Goode men come back for these movies, I would like to see Ashley Zukerman and Ted Sutherland as the Goode men again (since they were already using the same actors throughout the Fear Street movies).
I've heard those rumours too! About like spin off movies like Ruby Lane or the milkman. Those would be fun! Me and a few others are hoping they'll do an anthology series but keep the actors in different roles. If not, I hope they do bring the old cast back (Nick as a ghost advising whoever took the book would be cool)!
I guess we'll see though. The movies are pretty much confirmed but we don't know much. Hopefully Ash and Ted get to come back!
16 notes
·
View notes
😂 Oh yes, Kurt is absolutely the trusted (tolerable?) servant type there. Especially as by this point the male-line Goodes are down to just Nicky and Will. That’s it. All of the other lines of descent from Solomon’s other sons have dried up/died out and it took Will being born for Joe to do a double take and be all “WTF is going on? Ok, seriously what the fucking FUCK is going on?!?!” Hit the panic button, do some very ill-advised things, get the Devil and Co going “We are not amused” at him in response.
We all know how his idiot flailing worked out: Joseph ends up dead by Summer 1978. Nicky takes over the Pact. The wheels turn and the scales become balanced.
Can I just go the Danza route and call the niece Emma? Let’s say her Mom was an Austen fan. Nicky inherited the love of classic literature, even if his choice of genre and authors isn’t necessarily to his family’s liking.
Scrawling down ideas for FS fic… Somehow I skipped ahead to 1964 where Will is a babe in arms. Mrs. Goode has her hands full with the baby, her sister-in-law needs a break, the SIL’s husband needs a drink, Nick’s a toddler, Kurt’s the same (& is eating crayons), and Sheriff Joseph Goode is somehow roped into helping parent the most perplexing creature in existence - a stroppy teenage girl. (He doesn’t remember his sister being this bad. Was she? Ugh.) Also, he can too ground his niece. So there.
And then he took it out on Ruby. Was she friends with his niece? But yes this messy family dynamic sounds about right. I pity Joseph’s sister no wonder she turned out…………. badly. No one in the family ever had a chance.
14 notes
·
View notes