isayeed-blog
Iftekhar Sayeed
Iftekhar Sayeed teaches English and economics. He was born and lives in Dhaka, Bangladesh. He has contributed to The Danforth Review, Axis of Logic, Enter Text, Postcolonial Text, Southern Cross Review, Opednews.com, Left Curve, Mobius, Erbacce, The Journal and other publications. He is also a freelance journalist. He loves to tour Bangladesh.
1177 posts
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Last Seen Blogs
movimento5litri
Movimento 5 Litri
watariguy
i try to make stuff
qualitypersonawhispers
Untitled
v-confused-212
Hoard O’ Stuff
Text
WESTERN PROPAGANDA…
…like any propaganda, must level itself at the three elements of our personality.
1. THE SUPEREGO
“Western society is moral, fair, above board (unlike the rest of us).”
2. THE EGO
“Western society is harmonious, orderly.”
3. THE ID
“Western society is powerful.”
Needless to add, for the bulk of humanity - the dregs - it is the appeal to the id that overrides all else.
As for some thinking souls (such as yours truly), the first claim sits completely at odds with history as well as contemporary events. The power that we so admire resulted in wordwide depredations unmatched by the rest of humankind; claims to morality and harmony go by the board when considering even recent havoc perpetrated, for instance, in the Middle East.
But, as we know, propaganda works.
1 note
·
View note
Text
THE TYRANT WHO FED - AND THE TYRANT WHO STARVED
Norman Borlaug’s green revolution was imported into Pakistan by the government of Ayub Khan, the tyrant who filled our bellies in the 1960s. He saved millions.
In the 1970s, we starved by the millions.
0 notes
Text
NOIR AND THE AUDIENCE
The mystery of film noir and the quality of the audience must be resolved.
In 1940-60, American (and some - but not all - European) directors produced masterpieces for viewers barely out of high school, and long before the explosion in tertiary education worldwide in the ‘60s, when brawn paid nearly as well as brain.
We should not be surprised for the scene should immediately recall an earlier one - when illiterate yokels gawked at the plays of Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides.
Herder nailed it when he observed that the greatest art - from Homer to the Old Testament - proceeded from the illiterati.
The oral tradition spans our civilisation, and great messages would not be so great had they been timebound and exclusive to a few.
One has only to think of the religious life of humankind to record the hoary antiquity of the sublime.
In the film “Detour”, we see a man pitted against merciless fate - something that is almost Euripidean - and losing at every turn.
On the other hand, we see the fates pursuing a woman to her own ruin and that of others for overstepping her allotted sphere in life in the noir masterpiece “Too Late for Tears” - terrible retribution awaits her hybris.
Thou shalt neither covet nor kill.
#film noir#detour#euripides#aeschylus#sophocles#von herder#illiterate#homer's iliad#old testament#factories#hubris#erinyes
0 notes
Text
The Only Way Out For Bangladesh: The Army
By way of reflection and anticipation, recall Eric Hoffer’s predicted demise in 1951 of the Soviet Union: “It is not actual suffering but the taste of better things which excites people to revolt. A popular upheaval in Soviet Russia is hardly likely before the people get a real taste of the good life. The most dangerous moment for the regime of the Politburo will be when a considerable improvement in the economic conditions of the Russian masses has been achieved and the iron totalitarian rule somewhat relaxed…..When people revolt in a totalitarian society, they rise not against the wickedness of the regime but its weakness (The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements (New York: Perennial Classics, 2002), pp 29, 43).” David Reynolds today vindicates the stevedore’s crystal-gazing: “Looser political controls allowed elements of a civil society to emerge outside the state, particularly student and intellectual groups. Their growing audacity was encouraged by evident splits within the party leadership over the nature and limits of reform. In China, as in the Soviet Block, in short, pressure from below could erupt because of rifts at the top (One World Divisible: A Global History Since 1945 (New York: W.W.Norton and Co., 2000), p 576).”
In which case, the prospects for a liberal society - with its three separate branches of government - must appear chimerical for Bangladesh, lest wiser heads look back, not in anger, but hope at the happy military periods in our tragic history when the tripartition had not been a fantasy.
#bangladesh#toalitarianism#revolt#china#soviet union#Mikhail Gorbachev#deng xiaoping#general zia#general ershad
1 note
·
View note
Link
A doubting Thomas might be pardoned querying the dramatic ballyhooing of Bangladesh in the Western media: the Guardian’s recent article labelled the country “an economic miracle” undergone “in recent years” - a period coinciding with the “rise and rise” of the anti-Islamic Hasina regime since 2009.
More sober sources, such as the World Bank, display continuity rather than inspiration: “The emergence of an export-oriented garment in Bangladesh - one of the world’s poorest countries with a GNP per capita of only $170 and with 57 percent of its population in poverty - was a great success in the early 1980s.” The country profile shows a secular doubling of income per head every ten years from 1990 to 2021 - hardly a wunder geschichte. Life expectancy, fertility rate, infant life expectancy all show a similar upward trend over the time period.
Interestingly, the Guardian article focuses exclusively on women in the textile business - completely ignoring the number of migrants to the Middle East and elsewhere, who are mostly male. According to The Economist (“Migration in the Gulf”), a migrant to the Middle East earns 250-350% more than one who stays home. Research shows that “by letting in so many migrants the GCC countries do more (per head) to reduce global income inequality than richer OECD countries, which send loads of aid but keep their borders relatively closed. Were the OECD countries to open their borders to the same extent as Kuwait, which has two migrants for every native, global inequality could be cut by a quarter.”
Approximately 7.5 million Bangladeshis were migrants in 2010, with 90% working in the Middle East and Malaysia. Between 1976 and 2018, a total of roughly 12 million workers migrated from Bangladesh, starting from a paltry 6,078. The figure compares dramatically with the number of women (4.5 million) employed by the garment sector. According to the World Bank, a 10% increase in the share of international migrants in a country’s population leads to a 2.1% decline in the share of people living on less than $1 per person per day (the poverty level in 2005).
Since migrants are, by definition, invisible, they do not show up in Western reports on Bangladesh, such as the Guardian fable. Being mostly men, in addition, disqualifies them for attention. Further, journeying to the pogonocratic Middle East from the local pogonocracy is not regarded as a career move by the Western media. The Middle East is where mad mullahs, mediaeval sheikhs and murderous terrorists associate in well-reported disharmony.)
#global development#bangladesh#fashion industry#south and central asia#gender bias#islamophobia#media bias#migration
0 notes
Text
WHAT GEORGE FLOYD’S DEATH MEANS - OR SHOULD MEAN - IN BANGLADESH
(click above for article)
We had two chances to clear the Augean stables that is Bangladesh.
And we botched them both.
The second time, with the death of Abrar Farhad, it became evident why we failed the first time, over the death of Biswajit Das.
Our conception of justice extends only to those we know, those who are like us. Abrar was like us.
That is to say, we have no conception of justice at all.
Please share.
0 notes
Text
INFANTS OF BANGLADESH
INFANTS OF BANGLADESH
I wanted to discuss a matter: our infantilism. You’ve seen the Al Jazeera report: the obvious conclusion to draw is that military rule was much better than civilian rule, even in the 70s.
MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION: why can’t we draw this simple conclusion? What explains our misology? Elementary, mon ami! Foreign tutelage. Tutelage transmitted through local lackeys. Subeditor Modon Shahu told me, “We know people want martial law, but we can’t print that”. YOUR RIGHT TO KNOW, you know.
Then editor Mahfuz Anam, no less, says our prosperity, such as it is, is due to her highness Hasina, the PM. But we know the garments factories and the migrations to the ME occurred before her tenure, in the ‘80s. Anam, as editor, should know that governments cannot create wealth. When they try - as we did in the ‘70s - we do a bad job.
Then there’s the torrential propaganda from Western media: universal values. Undemocratic people are savages. Ergo, we are savages. Our best minds prefer evil to being tarred and feathered with “military rule”.
In brief, we are infantile: even our finest minds can’t put 2 and 2 together. They come up with 5 or 55, as children are wont to do. Foreign tutelage renders us infantile.
0 notes
Text
SONGS OF THE REICH (excerpts of last lines)
Gerhard Schumann (1911 - 95)
Song 1
I lost my Self and found the Volk, the Reich.
Song 2
And above us, illuminated: the cathedral, the Reich.
Song 3
Thus arose anew, from Blood and Soil, the Reich.
Song 4
It glows Volk from many, from the Volk: the Reich.
Song 6
Oh Fuhrer! Rule us! Oh Lord set us free!
Song 7
The sun arose. And with it rose the Reich.
0 notes
Link
Playing political football with genocide is something we understand. We do it all the time in Bangladesh. We do it to settle scores and justify current crimes, like murder, disappearances and looting.
But when Biden chose to score points with Turkey, because its leader had bought weapons from Russia, we seemed to plumb new lows.
However, the Armenian lobby was chuffed no end. As if a presidential statement makes an historical fact "more true".
But we in Bangladesh know the highs that one gets from being talked about, and talking about, the "crucified nation".
0 notes
Text
THE DEMON, ISLAM
Demonising Islam and Muslims makes this group of people vulnerable to bombs, bullets and missiles.
Afghans, Iraqis, Lybians - many of them children - are perceived as demon-Muslims A good Muslim is a dead Muslim.
Demonising of Islam, for which there is a ready market, has been carried on by writers ranging from the Somali Ayaan Hirshi Ali to the Bangladeshi Tahmima Anam.
Our current capo, masquerading as the legitimate ruler, owes the scant legitimacy to anti-Islamism.
On either side of the Indo-Bangladesh border, the demonising of Islam shores up the tyranny.
#islam#islamophobia#islambashing#ayaan hirsi ali#tahmima anam#taslima nasreen#bjp#narendra modi#sheikh hasina#afghanistan#Iraq War#afghan war#libyan war#demonising
1 note
·
View note
Text
THE HANGINGS
The hanging of the tyrannicides of August 1975 - a family vendetta carried out by means of our public institutions - holds a disquieting lesson:
"tyranny must be unopposed"
What our rulers can demand of us is unconditional obedience.
Unconditional obedience to government was the pre-modern norm, universally accepted, until thinkers like Thomas Hobbes and John Locke began to ponder the nature and essence of government. Neither of these two men accepted the tradition of unconditional obedience.
In Bangladesh, the hangings, private vendetta made public, tell us that we are subjects, not citizens. The government can do whatever it chooses, and we must, like sheep, accept our fates.
1 note
·
View note
Text
THE KANGAROO COURT AND THE SEVEN HONEST JUDGES
Seven High Court judges refused to hear the case against the tyrannicides of August 1975.
They said they were "embarrassed", without saying why. They didn't have to.
But we all knew the reason: These upright men of the judiciary refused to sit in on a kangaroo court, where judge, jury and executioner were the same - The Dynasty.
The hangings took place, of course, and that was the end of our hitherto independent judiciary.
The last stand of the seven judges must be inscribed in gold - not golden - letters above the High Court Building.
They were heroes.
0 notes
Text
BRIAN HAW WEEK
Brian Haw’s competition was formidable.
Against him were arrayed the cumulative might of the British parliament in his homeland, and the US Congress across the pond.
In 1996, Leslie Stahl interviewed Madeleine Albrght, the Secretary of State, on the TV programme “60 Minutes” and stated that more children had died in Iraq through sanctions than had been killed in Hiroshima in 1945. “We think the price is worth it,” responded Albright.
Nits make lice, no doubt, and in the public imagination the West was up against “Saddam-Hitler”.
Norman Finkelstein, himself a pariah in the Western world, put the figure at 1 million in his book “The Holocaust Industry” published in 2001.
In its obituary on the recent death of Madeleine Albrght, the Washington Post wrote a glowing eulogy that nowhere mentioned the momentous interview.
youtube
0 notes
Text
BRIAN HAW WEEK
Today we look at the background behind Brian Haw’s decade-long encampment at Parliament Square.
Was he an eccentric who had his facts wrong? On the contrary.
As early as 1996, Madeleine Albright, secretary of state, went on record to say that the death of 500,000 Iraqi children had been “worth it”.
Former US Attorney General Ramsey Clark, who had documented the effect of the bombings and sanctions, described the deaths as “one of the great human disasters of history.”
“It’s been a hell on earth since January of 1991.”
I leave the reader to draw his or her own conclusions about the moral position adopted by Brian, so redolent of the saints we read about in the holy books.
In fact, his Christianity, I believe, was part of the “problem” in secular Britain, where he was ignored for ten years.
19 June 2022
youtube
0 notes
Text
BRIAN HAW WEEK
On this day, eleven years ago, Brian Haw passed away.
Who was Brian Haw?
You’ve probably never heard of him, and you probably never will. As though he had never existed.
From June, 2001 until his cancer no longer permitted, in 2011, Brian spent 10 years at Parliament Square campaigning against sanctions against Iraq. Nearly 2 million children died.
This week, I hope you’ll join me in recalling what little we know about Brian Haw, whom the media studiously ignored, surely the greatest man of this century.
Kindly leave your comments and questions below.
18 June 2022
0 notes
Text
LYNCH MOB AT SHAHBAGH
Tahmima Anam is the daughter of Mahfuz Anam (that's right; the editor of the ass-wipe Daily Star) and this is one of her finest blowjobs.
Nowhere does she say that the protestors are in contempt of court. They're rejecting the judgement of the highest court in the land, supposedly to be kept above all pressures, whether from the government or a mob of 500,000 savages.
These people are not the illiterate peasants - yet they do not know what a counter-majoritarian institution is supposed to be. These people were out for a lynching - lynching is part of our culture. The government has taken lynching to new heights - disappearing the dead bodies. But lynching is part of our mentality: to hell with courts and the law.
And aiding these pre-modern savages are people like Tahmima Anam - and newspapers like The Guardian.
How would the editors of the Guardian respond to a similar scene in London before the Supreme Court?
They don't have to live here, so they couldn't give a fuck.
0 notes
Link
1990 - RETRO-PORN, FEATURING CJ & MEDIA
"After the fall of Ershad on December 6, 1990, then vice-president Moudud Ahmed stepped down and then chief justice Shahabuddin was appointed to the post. Consequently, Ershad resigned and handed over power to Shahabuddin who became the head of the government as acting president."
- The Daily Star
Our ass-wipe newspaper conceals the truth - again (motto: YOUR RIGHT TO KNOW).
On resignation of the president, per our constitution, the vice-president takes over - NOT the chief justice. When Nixon resigned, Ford became president; when Suharto resigned, Habibie was sworn in. Veeps succeed.
This man - the guardian of the constitution - ass-fucked the constitution.
Moudud Ahmed's detention was declared illegal by my father's friend, Justice B. B. Roy Chowdhury. He showed me his judgement: the police had stated that Ahmed had been jailed "for his protection". Justice Chowdhury declared that this was not contemplated "in the four corners of the law". His judgement is in the archives of the Supreme Court.
Based on this verdict, the 5-bench Supreme Court (of which Justice Chowdhury was a member) declared Ershad's detention illegal.
In all this constitution-fucking and law-castrating, the honourable Chief Justice played the part of de Sade run amok in a lesbian brothel.
"In February 1991, Justice Shahabuddin Ahmed gave the nation what was until then an almost impossible dream -- a free, fair and peaceful election -- navigating the country out of the political quagmire it had fallen into after the assassination of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and subsequent military coups."
Yes, with two dynasties fingering our butt-holes for a vote.
The Daily Star claps its hands at the orgy.
This was the beginning of the ruination of our judiciary - which venereal disease has gone to the cerebral cortex of the patient.
Wipe your arse with The Daily Star.
0 notes