Tumgik
#bjp
slicedblackolives · 7 months
Text
the author describes my dread v accurately um
167 notes · View notes
blocking desi blogs with the word sanatani cuz which self-respecting person admits that in public
23 notes · View notes
Link
The section of the BBC film that the government of India has acted most outraged about was the revelation of an internal report commissioned by the British Foreign Office in April 2002, so far unseen by the public. The fact-finding report estimated that “at least 2,000” people had been murdered. It called the massacre a preplanned pogrom that bore “all the hallmarks of ethnic cleansing”. It said reliable contacts had informed them that the police had been ordered to stand down. The report laid the blame squarely at Modi’s door. It was chilling to see the former, but obviously still cautious, British diplomat who was one of the investigators on the fact-finding mission choosing to remain anonymous, with his back to the camera.
[...]
Though The Modi Question was broadcast exclusively for a British audience, and limited to the UK, it was uploaded by viewers on YouTube and links were posted on Twitter. It lit up the internet. In India, students received warnings not to download and watch it. When they announced collective screenings in some university campuses, the electricity was switched off. In others, police arrived in riot gear to stop them watching. The government instructed YouTube and Twitter to delete all links and uploads. Those sterling defenders of free speech hurried to comply. Some of my Muslim friends were baffled. “Why does he want to ban it? The Gujarat massacre has always helped him. And we’re in an election year.”
213 notes · View notes
Text
DON'T VOTE FOR MODI. PLEASE!!!
I am having to make an effort at writing a coherent post instead of just screaming. Please don't vote for Modi.
He is not a saviour. He is not a God.
Here's what he is: A terrified extremist who has to maim the mainstream media to keep his support, who NEEDS to plunder the Hindu Muslim divide in India, and spread hate and fear about communities that can very peacefully coexist, in order to gain people's support, to be seen as an saviour for upper caste Hindus in India. He needs to shut down the internet, so many times that India had the largest internet shutdowns in the past year, to shut the voices of people. He is the leader of the party that drafted a bill that would maintain stringent control over OTT platforms, the only free and accessible source for information in India at this point, AFTER THEY SUSPENDED 140 MEMBERS OF OPPSN. Who maintains silence over protesters of his own country being attacked by tear gasses and pellets, who welcomes RAPISTS into his party.
And a lot of his actions suggest that he will bring dictatorship in India.
Here's what a lot of you are going to say: OMG, what is the other opinion, Rahul 'Pappu' Gandhi? Well, sorry to inform you guys, but India (fortunately) is not a two party system. It is a MULTIPARTY nation. There are a lot many options. vote for your MP's, who you think will have your voices heard.
12 notes · View notes
Text
ooc but important
Tumblr media
They're so desperate they put their ad on a mostly leftist, liberalist, boycotting woke and gay website. Modiji ka maansik santulan thik nhi hai (modiji's mental stability is not good)
10 notes · View notes
cavalierzee · 2 months
Text
Safe and Sound With The Taliban
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Brazilian women taking a selfie with Taliban.
She traveled 63 countries before reaching India, then she gets gang raped by 7 men in India.
Women aren’t safe there at all.
India has the highest rate of rape on earth.
8 notes · View notes
hindulivesmatter · 1 month
Note
Why hasn't BJP hired you already?? You're doing all this work for free? 😯
I know right? Every day it kills me that my political opinions do not pay the bills.
7 notes · View notes
curtwilde · 2 months
Text
instagram
India's ruling right-wing Hindu extremist party BJP's workers backed by police seize Bibles from Christians, force them to convert to Hinduism and threatens them in case Bibles are found in their homes again.
9 notes · View notes
sudamaniparva · 10 months
Text
no but adipurush is so fucking funny to me. they made a movie about sri ram SPECIFICALLY to get the hindutva mobs to show up to the theater and make bank with their 700 crore budget. they cast veteran actors like Saif Ali Khan and powerful action heroes like Prabhas (i've neer seen anything of Kriti Sanon but i think she's good too). the director was also not horrible as in he had won filmfare awards earlier.
and it's such a clusterfuck that it's not even funny anymore. the actors are getting sexist and islamophobic trolls at them for daring to explore a FICTIONAL take on the Ramayana. the cgi is so bad that it makes me miss Magadheera. the script fits with the phantom menace and The Room. they had every ingredient needed to make a good propaganda film and they blew it so hard. what the fuck.
25 notes · View notes
anarchistin · 6 months
Text
Kashmir has been colonized by the Indian state since 1947, but recent changes demonstrate how it is increasingly becoming a settler-colonial project.
As opposed to classic colonialism that aims to unlawfully retain control of a territory, take advantage of its resources, and deny its people self-determination, settler-colonialism seeks to acquire land so that colonists can settle permanently and form new communities in what they see as their new “home.”
In Kashmir, we have seen a combination of classic as well as settler-colonial strategies.
42 notes · View notes
lilithism1848 · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
18 notes · View notes
tomboyjessie13 · 3 months
Text
What the hell's going on in India? What's the BJP? What's Hindutva? What's Modi? And why am I suddenly hearing all of this right now and not then?
I've been reblogging posts for several days regarding the war that's going on currently, but I have never heard of this going on in India until now.
8 notes · View notes
humanrightsupdates · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
(New York) – Indian authorities are revoking visa privileges to overseas critics of Indian origin who have spoken out against the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government’s policies, Human Rights Watch said today. Prime Minister Narendra Modi often attends mass gatherings of diaspora party supporters in the United States, Europe, Australia, and elsewhere to celebrate Indian democracy, while his government has targeted people it claims are “tarnishing the image” of the country.
The Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) status is available to foreign citizens of Indian origin or foreigners married to Indian nationals to obtain broad residency rights and bypass visa requirements, but does not amount to citizenship. Many of those whose OCI visa status was revoked are Indian-origin academics, activists, and journalists who have been vocal critics of the BJP’s Hindu majoritarian ideology. Some have challenged their exclusion in Indian courts on constitutional grounds seeking protection of their rights to speech and livelihood.
“Indian government reprisals against members of the diaspora who criticize the BJP’s abusive and discriminatory policies show the authorities’ growing hostility to criticism and dialogue,” said Elaine Pearson, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The authorities seem intent on expanding politically motivated repression against Indian activists and academics at home to foreign citizens of Indian origin beyond India’s borders.” (Human Rights Watch)
5 notes · View notes
diveintomydream · 3 months
Text
Dont be racist, homophobic, transphobic
7 notes · View notes
thoughtlessarse · 11 days
Text
Narendra Modi’s electoral success in Gujarat between 2001 and 2014 and on the Indian scene since then stems from his novel blend of populism and Hindu nationalism (Hindutva). Hindutva grew out of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (National Volunteer Organization, RSS), a paramilitary-style nationalist group founded in 1925 to bulk up young Hindus both physically and morally so they could stand up to Muslims, who were depicted as a danger to the majority. Modi joined the RSS as a child and devoted his life to it, pursuing no other careers and even living apart from his wife. He rose through the ranks, eventually becoming the chief minister of Gujarat (his home state) in 2001. The following year, he oversaw an anti-Muslim pogrom that left some 2,000 dead— a strategy of religious polarization that won him the December 2002 regional elections. Similar successes in 2007 and 2012 made Modi the obvious prime ministerial candidate for his Bharatiya Janata Party (Indian People’s Party, BJP) in 2014. But he left behind the RSS tradition of collective decision-making, putting himself front and center and striving to connect directly with “his” people. Rather than relying on the activist network, Modi held rally after rally where he showcased his flair for speechmaking. He also founded his own television channel, worked social media, and employed a revolutionary strategy: using holograms to simultaneously lead one rally in hundreds of places. Modi even distributed masks printed with his likeness to deepen supporters’ identification with him. In short, he saturated the public arena so as to embody the masses—a task made easier by his low-caste origins, on which he has built a complete narrative. (He worked as a teaboy in his father’s shop.) However, the “masses” meant only the Hindu majority, which he was busy stirring up against one target in particular: Muslims. As in the 2014 elections, in 2019 “Moditva”—Modi’s idiosyncratic hybridization of right-wing nationalist ideology, Hindutva and a personality cult—triumphed on the strength of BJP landslides in the north and west. This success allowed him to bend to his will both the RSS and the BJP—whose MPs had ridden to victory on his coattails—fashioning a government of faithfuls and a parliament of yes-men. The other institutions soon succumbed too—even the Supreme Court, once a beacon of independence. In the summer of 2014, Modi advanced a constitutional reform that would have changed the appointment process for judges, until then picked by a collegium of peers. His co-optation, opposed by the entire political class, would have replaced the collegium with a five-member commission. The Supreme Court eventually declared the amendment unconstitutional, but Modi still got his way: Of the nominees submitted by the collegium, his government finalized appointments only for those he liked. The court thus resigned itself to proposing candidates who were apt to please him.
continue reading
6 notes · View notes
hyperdemona · 1 year
Text
BJP-muktha dakshina bharatham.
19 notes · View notes