Tumgik
#104.9
milesbutterball · 1 year
Text
Watch "Bach – Cantata, BWV 63" on YouTube
youtube
https://www.ideastream.org/schedule/wclv
2 notes · View notes
not12001ants · 2 years
Text
i hope my transphobic uncle can sleep at night knowing he has made me realize that i think being called mr. Olivia and Sir Olivia is really fucking GENDER
3 notes · View notes
svalleynow · 1 month
Text
Best in the Sequatchie Valley Nominations CLOSE at Noon Friday
To keep a long-standing tradition in the area alive that started with the former Jasper Journal and South Pittsburg Hustler newspapers and continued most recently with the Marion County News before it ceased publication earlier last year, SValleyNow.com (Sequatchie Valley Now), along with parent company Tennessee Valley Broadcasting and WEPG and WSDQ radio is proud to announce that after securing…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
spokanefavs · 2 months
Text
Christian music radio station KEEH-FM has broadcast from Spokane for 30 years, but it was a 2016 rebrand as Shine 104.9 that boosted its audience size and expansion.
Seven years ago, Shine sought to connect more with area nonprofits and Christian churches to share events. It took on a more local focus. Meanwhile, the station steadily climbed in ratings, as tallied by broadcast tracking company Nielsen.
0 notes
contestshubs · 2 years
Text
Bounce 104.9 Big Money Jackpot Contest
Tumblr media
Bounce 104.9 Big Money Jackpot Contest is giving to chance to Win $25,000 CAD to enter the Contests.
1 note · View note
Text
Found my favorite radio station... >:)
0 notes
bunniesbone · 7 months
Text
OMG JUST WEIGHED MYSELF AND I'M 47.6KGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (104.9 LBS) I'M SO HAPPY THIS IS THE LIGHTEST I BEEN IN YEARS
(((o(*゚▽゚*)o)))
I'M ALSO 47 HOURS INTO MY 72 HOUR FAST YAYYYYYY I'M SO HAPPY AND MOTIVATED
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
not mine DM for removal!!!! 🍓
86 notes · View notes
waste4waist · 1 month
Text
late about me:
NOT PRO @NA!!
i’m 20, 5’5.5”, she/her, & BMI 17.5.
SW: 121
CW: 103.4
GW: 105 completed 04/12/24
UGW: 100
looking for friends who don’t participate in shaming, f@tphobia, & pro@na behavior. 18+ ONLY
this is for ME. not for anyone to look up to or feel any type of way about.
my interests <3 ☆
- billie eilish my love my life i love her sm
- documentaries!!
- true crime
- yt podcasts/videos from cody ko, brittany broski, cancelled pod, jenn mcallister, etc.
- if u know about ruby franke im actually in need to talk about the news w/ someone IMMEDIATELY
- sad songs LMAO i love sad songs idk
————☆
weight log (in lbs):
01/08/24: 121
02/08/24: 116.8
02/18/24: 115
02/22/24: 113.8
02/29/24 113.4
03/01/24: 109.2
03/12/24: 107.2
03/15/24: 106.2
03/25/24: 106
03/27/24: 105.8
04/06/24: 105.5
04/08/24: 105.3
04/09/24: 105.1
04/12/24: 104.9
04/14/24: 103.9
04/18/24: 103.4
⋆ ˚。⋆୨୧˚ 🤎⭐️🍓
16 notes · View notes
swan2swan · 2 years
Text
Goodnight everyone, but especially to Vancouver’s 104.9 soft rock radio station, which has apparently been playing Rage Against the Machine’s “Killing in the Name Of” on loop for the past ten hours to protest layoffs announced at the station this morning.
Heroes.
401 notes · View notes
milesbutterball · 1 year
Text
0 notes
lawrenceleemagnuson · 11 months
Photo
Tumblr media
Henri Martin (France 1860-1943) Saint-Cirq Lapopie (1926) oil on canvas 104.9 x 84.9 cm
34 notes · View notes
svalleynow · 5 months
Text
The River 104.9 Earns Chattanooga Times-Free Press Award
The River 104.9/AM 910 was named as a finalist in the Best of the Best People’s Choice competition in the Chattanooga Times Free Press. The River competed against multiple radio stations in the area, including Chattanooga stations. Station owner Travis Hickman said he is extremely excited that the station earned the award. He thanked his staff for the outstanding job they do each day, and he said…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
if-you-fan-a-fire · 2 years
Link
“Early on Wednesday morning, someone at a pop and soft rock station in Vancouver, Canada, began playing the song Killing in the Name by Rage Against the Machine.
Then they played it again.
And again.
By midday, the song had played hundreds of times on Kiss Radio 104.9 FM, prompting online speculation that the singular choice was a protest against layoffs by parent company Rogers Sports and Media.
Industry insiders, however, argued it was a stunt to signal a format change at the station to alternative rock. The song’s lyrics include the repeated line: “Fuck you, I won’t do what you tell me!”. The station, however, played the sanitised radio edit.
A call to the radio studio did not yield clarity.
The man who answered the phone would not explain why they were playing the song on repeat, nor provide his real name. Instead, he asked to be called Apollo after the character in the Rocky films.
“I’m not allowed to say. I’m just a guy in a booth, just letting the Rage play over and over,” said Apollo. “What do you think? Do you like it?”
The incident came a day after the co-hosts of the station’s morning show posted on Facebook that they had suddenly been fired.
“Our five years on KiSS RADiO has come to an end. KiSS is changing and unfortunately we were informed that we won’t be part of this new chapter. Although this comes with mixed emotions, we want to express one overwhelming feeling: gratitude,” wrote ex-hosts Kevin Lim and Sonia Sidhu.
On Wednesday, callers’ attempts to request anything besides Killing in the Name were denied.
Between requests, the song looped several times with no discernible beginning or end. Rather, it was just one long version of Killing in the Name.
Apollo told the Guardian that the song was already on when he arrived at work, but couldn’t say exactly when it began.
“I don’t know. I should, probably. If you’re writing an article and my boss reads it, I’m gonna get in trouble,” he said.
This reporter answered, “Well, I mean, I think you might get in trouble anyway.”
“Good point,” he answered.”
////
As of my posting, 7:25 PM EST, June 29, 2022, this is still happening.  A comrade in Vancouver posted about it a few hours ago:
OH MY GOD! If you're near a radio... put it on 104.9 Kiss FM.... Roger's laid everyone off including their DJs and Staff. So they have been playing Rage against the machines 'Killing in the name of" on repeat for the last few hours. Apparently a guy called in to hear some Mariah Carey, the one DJ left was like "nope!" And restarted the song again. This is the best and most comical way to fight back hahaha UPDATE: They are still playing it as of 4:15pm, so that's a solid 12hrs so far  that's roughly 145 times the song has played today...
Not earth-shattering or particular important given all the other shit going on, but as a former radio host, both commercial and campus, this is spoke to me.
121 notes · View notes
mariacallous · 8 months
Text
In a famous conversation, the author F. Scott Fitzgerald is credited with saying that “the rich are very different than you and me,” to which Ernest Hemingway replied “Yes, they have more money.”
Our work highlights another key difference: the most affluent Americans not only have more income; they receive it—and pay taxes on it—in vastly different ways than the rest of us.
For policy makers concerned about long-term fiscal shortfalls and high levels of economic inequality, our work reinforces the notion that raising the tax burden on the wealthy requires a special focus on how those households gain wealth and skirt taxes. We highlight four ways to effectively raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans.
How Americans make money
Most Americans receive almost all their income through wages and retirement income (pensions, 401(k)s, social security, and individual retirement accounts). The most recent available IRS data (2014) shows that wages and retirement income made up 94% of adjusted gross income (AGI) for households in the bottom 80% of the income distribution. Even for households in the 98th to 99th income percentile, wages and retirement income accounted for 71% of AGI.
At the very, very top, though, these sources are less important, accounting for just 15% and 7% of the income of the top 0.01% and the top 0.001% of households, respectively. These households  receive most of their income from investments (interest, dividends, and especially realized capital gains) and businesses (including sole proprietorships, partnerships, and S corporations). These items constituted 82% of income for the top 0.01% and 88% for the top 0.001%, compared to just 7% for the bottom 80% of households.
These patterns are robust over time and data sources. And in practice, the tilt toward capital income at the top is even larger than these figures suggest because AGI does not include the massive unrealized capital gains and very sizable inheritances that accrue to many affluent households.
Tumblr media
How that money gets taxed
Wages face heavier taxation than capital income, even though wages go mainly to low- and middle-income households and capital income goes mainly to high-income households. Most federal revenues are collected from wages. Payroll taxes account for 33% of federal revenues and are imposed solely on wages. Income taxes account for another 52% of federal revenues, and studies show that the share of income tax revenues that derive from capital income is quite small. These studies were performed before the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which further diminished the taxation of capital via special deductions for business and cuts in the top income tax rate, the corporate tax rate, and the estate tax.
Moreover, the highest effective marginal income tax rates on wages exceed 40%, whereas much business income is taxed at a top rate below 30%, dividends and realized capital gains are taxed below 25%, and unrealized gains are not taxed until they are sold. As a result, the tax share of income paid by the very highest-income households is often lower than for middle-class households.
How to fix it
There are many ways to raise taxes on the wealthy without  harming economic growth.  Here we highlight four options.
Capital gains reform may be necessary if policymakers want to increase tax burdens on wealthy households. The simplest policy here would be the elimination of the step-up basis at death. Heirs would pay capital gains taxes on the taxable basis of the decedent who acquired the asset, instead of the basis of the asset at death. In 2020, the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) staff calculated that terminating step-up that year would raise $104.9 billion over the next 10 years. Alternatively, capital gains could be taxed at death, and treated as though the decedent had sold that asset. Batchelder and Kamin (2019) used 2016 JCT predictions to estimate that taxing accrued gains at death and raising the capital gains rate to 28% would raise $290 billion between 2021 and 2030.
Taxing intergenerational wealth transfers can make taxes more progressive and offset disparities in opportunity across income classes. Currently, less than 0.1% of all estates are subject to the estate tax, down from 7.65% in 1977.  As baby boomers die, they are set to pass down $72.6 trillion in assets to heirs. Taxing these transfers more heavily would reduce inequality, increase opportunity, and raise revenues.  The estate tax could be converted to an inheritance tax on recipients, with a reduced threshold of a million dollars for all gifts and inheritances (compared to the current threshold of almost $13 million) coupled with a tax rate that would equal the heir’s income tax rate plus some amount. This combined tax rate would integrate income and estate taxes. Since the heirs to wealthy estates are already usually in high tax brackets, the distributional impact would be similar to (though slightly less progressive than) the estate tax. This change has the political advantage of focusing on wealthy heirs, who were lucky enough to be the beneficiaries of wealthy relatives or friends, instead of targeting those who accumulated wealth.
Eliminating the Section 199A deduction for qualified business incomes would target another key component of income for the wealthy.  The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) reduced the top income tax rate from 39.6% to 37%, and the deduction brought the effective rate on qualified business income down to 29.6%. In 2020, the Tax Policy Center (TPC) estimated that the deduction would lower federal revenues by $417 billion over the following 10 years. The deduction is inequitable: the TPC estimated that 55% of the direct tax benefits in 2019 would go to families in the top 1% of the income distribution and 26% of the benefits would go to the top 0.1%. Although the deduction was intended to increase employment and investment, the incentives for both are actually quite low given the complicated structure and non-targeted nature of the deduction.  Additionally, its complexity creates an opening for business owners to reduce their taxes by re-arranging and relabeling their investments and expenses, a practice which is further incentivized  by the increased difference between the effective tax rates on wages and business income.
A final option would be to create a value added tax (VAT) coupled with a rebate or Universal Basic Income (UBI). This would leave the net tax burden smaller or unchanged for most households but would impose higher tax burdens on the wealthy. Currently, wealthy households can finance extravagant levels of consumption without even paying capital gains taxes on the accruing wealth by following a “buy, borrow, die” strategy, in which they finance current spending with loans and use their wealth as collateral. By avoiding realizing their capital gains, they can avoid taxes at the same time they enjoy a luxurious lifestyle. A VAT would tax consumption and hence would force the affluent to pay taxes on their lifestyle, even if they did not pay much in income tax. A VAT of 10%, combined with a UBI payment of the federal poverty line times the VAT rate times two, would raise about $2.9 trillion over 10 years. The Tax Policy Center estimates that this system  would be extremely progressive: after-tax income for the lowest quintile would increase by 17%, the tax burden for middle-income people wouldn’t change, and incomes for the top 1% of households would be reduced by 5.5%. The VAT would also function as a 10% tax on existing wealth, since future consumption can only be financed with existing wealth or future wages.
Conclusion
Each of these proposals would undoubtedly face significant opposition from those who benefit from the challenge of taxing affluent households: the wealthy themselves. However, in order to face the dual concerns of ever-increasing national debt and rapidly growing inequality, it is a challenge that we must take on before it’s too late.
7 notes · View notes
vague-humanoid · 11 months
Text
9 notes · View notes
igotyouradio · 2 months
Text
WITH YOU-TH US RADIO REQUESTING
pls use us ip address in requesting
CNYKISS 959KISSFM KXFMRADIO THE SOCAL SOUND MY975FM THE CURRENT LIVE 95.9 Z90 93.5 THE MIX JAM z96.3 HOT z95 HITZ 104.9 MAGIC 92.7
u93 MIX 94.1 102.7 DABOMB SUNNY 106.9 ELECTRIC 94.9 KS95 LEO FM RADIO KUMU KONG RADIO KISS 98.5 95.3 97.5 THE BEAT 1045 THE BEAT 102 WYBR KISS 104.7 B97 STAR 101.5 96.9 THE WAVE PARTY 105.3 POWER 103.1
AT40 STAR 96.U 106.9 MORE FM
2 notes · View notes