Tumgik
#fnaf movie novelization spoilers
glitch-in-the-code · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
Do y’all think Abby’s first word was Mike’s name?
10 notes · View notes
bittwitchy · 4 months
Text
the fnaf movie novelization is ofc v different in multiple ways to the movie itself bc it's shows inner thoughts and things, and alternative versions of scenes (Aka some lines are like what the test audiences didnt like so they cut) but its also a lot funnier in certain aspects
9 notes · View notes
theautisticjedi · 5 months
Text
SOMEONE ON TWITTER GOT A HOLD THE NOVELIZATION EARLY AND MIKE'S BEEN TAKING CARE OF ABBY SINCE SHE WAS A BABY I AM NOT WELL AT ALL
Tumblr media
340 notes · View notes
shinewonder · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
springlock suits sure are funny like that
219 notes · View notes
btxtyuri · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
mike i know what you are
130 notes · View notes
springlock-suits · 6 months
Text
Au where Mike fucking died in that hallway and they made him possess the empty dog animatronic
134 notes · View notes
darthpastry · 3 months
Text
So apparently Mike and Vanessa might be canon in the FNaF movie novel, and if you’re happy about it then yay this is such a good day for you, but personally, I am devastated.
68 notes · View notes
cherrytimemachine · 5 months
Text
Parallels I noticed between Elizabeth and the Golden Freddy kid in the FNAF movie (plus my own ideas and interpretations):
- Coerces someone into trusting them and then trying to kill them (GF taking Abby to get turned into an animatronic and Baby scooping Michael to wear his skin)
- Both GF and Baby coerce people based on incorrect information (Baby thinks Michael is William and GF thinks Abby is becoming part of their “family” because of William controlling the kids, or I have another idea that GF might be trying to bring Abby back to the pizzeria so she can break William’s hold on the kids but I’ll elaborate on that some other time)
- Kills/attacks the main character’s aunt and leaves her on the floor (whether or not Aunt Jane is dead we don’t know for sure) like Baby does in The Fourth Closet with Aunt Jen (plus the Aunt Jane/Aunt Jen thing)
- Assuming that GF is William’s son and Vanessa’s brother, this would be a reverse of Sister Location. In the games, it’s the son who survives to adulthood and has to do his father’s bidding, while the daughter had been killed as a child and stuck in an animatronic. In the movie, the daughter survives and the son dies and becomes the leading spirit.
- Both Elizabeth and GF seems to have more authority over the other animatronics, both being the ones who really speak to the main characters directly.
- It’s possible that GF mistook Abby for Vanessa, seeing as her outfit on the first night she was there she wore the same pink top and blue pants combination that Vanessa wore in the photo with her father, which could parallel how Baby mistook Michael for William
Bonus Thoughts: I have a theory/hypothesis that the GF kid might actually be Michael, or this universe’s stand in for him. Instead of it being the idea that the Aftons and the Emilys switched kids, what if instead the kids in each family switched roles, like the brother (Garrett) being killed and turned into the Puppet instead of the sister (Charlie) like in the games (plus Mike being like the older brother who feels guilty for his brother’s death, and the novel said in chapter 1 that he felt like he was the problem in the family even before Garrett went missing, and then being related to Henry would be great). It would make a neat spin on things to see Vanessa as this world’s Elizabeth and her trying to free her brother, just like Michael did for his sister in the games. Whether a horrible fate will befall her like Michael had I don’t know we’ll just have to see for ourselves when the next movie comes out.
57 notes · View notes
orionsbite · 6 months
Text
SPOILERS
If I had to guess why some people don't like the movie, it's because it is obviously based off of the Silver eyes. The people who've only stuck around for the games probably wouldn't understand why things are the way they are. The movie has the same problem as the silver eyes trilogy, some people like it, some people just don't. I personally absolutely love the trilogy books and really enjoyed reading them. They are probably my favourite books ever written. I think it just comes down to opinion.
Also the whole Mike chasing and trying to find Garret ( is that how you spell it?? ) is definitely reflecting how Charlie throughout the novels tries to find Sammy. She can ' feel ' his presence and feels like he is locked away and needs to find him. The FNaF movie parallels ALOT from the Silver eyes, it just changes and adapts the events and characters. The whole Mike's brother was abducted by William Afton is clearly taken from Charlie. ' I killed your brother, now I will kill you. ' You can tell the whole movie is very heavily based on the FNaF novels if you've read them. For those unaware, in the novels Charlie has a brother ( Sammy ) who was taken by Afton ( I think at 3 years old? ). This is used in the movie for Mike, but changed instead where Mike tries to find who took Garret and he tries to change the past. Charlie spends her time in the novels trying to physically find Sammy, feeling like his spirit is locked away somewhere but she can still feel him.
( take everything I say with a grain of salt, and forgive me if I have spelt Garrot's name wrong. )
58 notes · View notes
chipistrate · 4 months
Text
Why does Mike have a crush on Vanessa in the movie novel
Boy you JUST met her what the hell
32 notes · View notes
sotogalmo · 4 months
Note
(Let me preface this with I’m only on chapter 8 of the book but-)
The novelization seems to imply that Mike put Abby into the Development Center after their mom died and he wishes that something like that was available for him when he was 12
*head in hands*
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
28 notes · View notes
glitch-in-the-code · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
I wanna talk about this, who told Mike this? I’m willing to bet it was his dad. I’m also willing to bet that the reason his dad agreed to try for another baby was because he thought it get his wife out of her slump, not because he wanted another kid
The whole page makes it seem like their dad was mentally checked out for awhile before actually leaving
8 notes · View notes
spr1ngbunni · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Going crazy over William Afton canonically smelling like a damp basement
25 notes · View notes
Text
FNAF 3 Movie Prediction
So, the movie takes place in 2000 (from memory of that one security cam, at least). This means that we have an interesting possibility concerning the third film.
In the games, William Afton was sealed away for decades, returning as the decayed form of Springtrap. We even see him being sealed away at the end of the first film, with the Golden Freddy kid (is it still Cassidy if it's a different timeline?) watching over him and closing the door.
So what if we followed the story for the return?
FNAF 3 the movie takes place in "modern day" (or thereabouts). It's been a semi-quiet time since whatever happens in the second film, everyone has reached a good place in their lives.
Until Abby, now an adult, gets a dream about Springtrap. This leads her to investigate, and upon discovering that someone found and moved the "golden rabbit", she gets a job at "Fazbear Frights" (or the movie equivalent) as a cover to get a closer look at things.
That's right: I predict that Abby Schmidt will take Michael Afton's place as the Five Nights Three protagonist.
I wonder if there'll be more or less fire than in the game...
17 notes · View notes
shinewonder · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
240 notes · View notes
mantisfriendd · 3 months
Text
FNAF MOVIE NOVEL REVIEW
I just finished reading the FNAF movie novel, and id like to give some thoughts on it
This post will contain spoilers for both the FNAF movie and it's novelization! continue at your own risk!
Overall I would say this is a pretty good adaptation of the movie, and it actually provides some additional context for some of the weaker plot points of the movie. A prime example being Aunt Jane's motivation for wanting custody over Abby. In the book there is a trust fund for Abby set up by her grand parents, Jane wants to take this money for herself and sees getting custody of Abby as the ticket to that money.
Some scenes in the book play out much differently then in the film, but generally things end in the same spots as they do in the movie.
being inside the characters heads allows us to get more characterization out of everyone, and for the most part I really like what they did here.
EDIT: The section on Doug is no longer relevant, Scott has announced that book Doug is non cannon, and new prints of the book have entirely rewritten his character, I don't have a newer print so I can't tell what's changed, maybe I'll buy one eventually to see.
The only character who I think is a direct downgrade from the film is unfortunately Doug. In the film Doug comes off as a hapless lawyer who is being held hostage by his client who is clearly in the wrong, and he still comes off like that in the book but with a clear difference. In the film we feel sorry for him, clearly he's not a bad guy, he's caught up in something he doesn't want to be in. In the book he is barely spoken about, and when he is described he is described as being spaced out and nearly catatonic. Other then not wanting to be there his only other trait in the book is being a creep. The Sparky's Diner scene is seen from Max's perspective in the book, and we get some amazing characterization from her, expressing her discomfort with the entire meeting with Jane and the plan her brother hatches. At some point in the scene she catches Doug staring at her breasts. (sidenote I think this might be the only time the word "breasts" appears in any FNAF book, just a strange inclusion for a series about murder pizza bears)
This is strange characterization for a fan favorite character in the original film, and nothing in the film would lead you to expect this kind of thing from him.
Sidenote here in the book Ness (Matpat's character) is said to be the son of the owner of Sparky's and the book describes him as an "Auburn-haired teen" which is a funny thing to call a man in his 30s.
Minor nitpick aside I think both the movie and the film are acceptable ways to experience the plot, some of the things I thought were weird could just have been my knowledge of the films events changing my perspective.
I also enjoy the reinstatement of some of the elements from earlier screenplays and earlier cuts of the film that we know about from various cast members. The father son relationship of Hank and Carl and Garrett appearing in the archway before The Yellow Rabbit appears being some examples.
The book is also way more gorey then the film was, to my surprise. I was almost shocked at the end of the book where both Vanessa and Mike are in a pool of their own blood, the FNAF books have always gone a little harder with the gore then the games have but I guess I wasn't expecting it because of how much of a blockbuster the film was. You know with all the eyes on everything FNAF movie related, but I'm happy to say the FNaF movie novelization keeps with the tradition of surprisingly bloody Scholastic published books.
I quite enjoyed my time with this book, if you haven't read it and wanna give it a go after watching the movie, I'd say it's a worthwhile read. I also read it pretty quickly, but it might have something to do with me already knowing the plot so I didn't have to let it sink in as much
7 notes · View notes