Tumgik
#intermining
communistkenobi · 3 months
Text
The deeply moralist tone that a lot of discussions about media representation take on here are primarily neoliberal before they are anything else. Like the shouting matches people get into about “purity culture” “pro/anti” etc nonsense (even if I think it’s true that some people have a deeply christian worldview about what art ought to say and represent about the world) are downstream of the basic neoliberal assumption that we can and must educate the public by being consumers in a market. “Bad representation” is often framed as a writer’s/developer’s/director’s/etc’s failure to properly educate their audience, or to educate them the wrong way with bad information about the world (which will compel their audience to act, behave, internalise or otherwise believe these bad representations about some social issue). Likewise, to “consume” or give money to a piece of media with Bad Representation is to legitimate and make stronger these bad representations in the world, an act which will cause more people to believe or internalise bad things about themselves or other people. And at the heart of both of those claims is, again, the assumption that mass public education should be undertaken by artists in a private market, who are responsible for creating moral fables and political allegories that they will instil in their audiences by selling it to them. These conversations often become pure nonsense if you don’t accept that the moral and political education of the world should be directed by like, studio executives or tv actors or authors on twitter. There is no horizon of possibility being imagined beyond purchasing, as an individual consumer in a market, your way into good beliefs about the world, instilled in you by Media Product 
879 notes · View notes
viejospellejos · 4 months
Text
Es Fujur!!!
Tumblr media
84 notes · View notes
luthiery · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Doctor Who (The Satan Pit) / Gideon the Ninth
330 notes · View notes
bittersweetresilience · 7 months
Text
it feels cosmically unfair that i think about writing all the time want to write all the time and sit down to write all the time and i come up with two sentences at best. there should be some reward system i think
59 notes · View notes
Text
Has anybody said a thing yet about how Aziraphale loves books, which by their nature are past-tense (having been written down, bound, sold, completed); and Crowley loves plants, which by their nature are present- and future-tense (being actively alive and growing and becoming)?
There's something here about treasuring the past and the roads that we've walked on, versus treasuring the future the time that we spend together now. And also the intersection of those things when they come together and form a whole picture. A Venn diagram of Time.
53 notes · View notes
queen-mabs-revenge · 1 year
Text
used a / just for the sake of using something, but interpret the pairing in whichever way — feel free to elaborate in the notes
181 notes · View notes
taquitosdeamor · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
La Historia Interminable - Michael Ende
Donar♥
328 notes · View notes
Text
Saw some of the Interminable Leather Discourse on my dash. Has anyone ever done an authoritative estimate of how bad it is or isn't?
They don't raise and kill animals specifically for leather. The hide is 4-10% of the monetary value of animals raised and killed for meat.
(10% according a rando on the leatherworking Reddit; 4% according to The Leather Lobby Incorporated's page on We Swear We're Not Evil, You Guys, citing a source that does not seem to say that. I'm just going to call it 5% for the round number.)
Approximately 55 square feet of leather per cow.
The lobbyists up there said it was 69% cows; the rest is sheep+goats+pigs, with pigs being the next biggest. Make it ~42.6 square feet per dead animal; the true number will be a bit smaller because they're not all pigs.
(Apparently if you buy Chinese leather and aren't careful about your sources they sometimes sell leather made from cat or dog skin and lie about it. I assume leather-wearers are not okay with this, but would be interested to find out why. Like, I know my reason, but it's probably not the same one.)
40 square feet for a small men's jacket. More for large, less for women.
A typical leather jacket kills about 1/20th of an animal, in the same ballpark as eating 100 (beef) burgers, or about half of a (chicken) burger.
Animals killed by faux leather:
Literally none?
If every plastic jacket you ever buy ends up in a landfill, that's like...one really big trash bag? A few square feet of area that didn't have much of anything living on it anyway?
Not trying to be sarcastic here; I just genuinely don't see how this hurts or kills much of anything.
Making plastic can't possibly be good for the environment, but it's definitely less bad than growing a one-twentieth-ass cow.
Final opinion on the Discourse:
Depending on how much meat you eat and how long you wear your clothes for, wearing leather is probably less bad than eating beef but around that ballpark.
It is way less bad than eating chicken.
As always, someone who eats as many cows as they want and no other animals has accomplished most of the good things about being vegan with barely any effort. This stays true if they also wear leather.
Arguing about leather is like arguing about the difference between mostly-vegetarian and actually-vegetarian.
I was hoping it'd be a small enough difference that I could say whatever, it's a rounding error, I'm gonna go buy leather now. It wasn't; this is a real difference.
But it is small enough that if you want to wear a leather without people yelling at you, you can skip buying chicken for three weeks and link the activists here so they get mad at me instead of you.
You know, if Internet arguments sound like a fun use of your time.
16 notes · View notes
seventeeneightyfine · 1 month
Text
late back from my fifteen minute break at work because i was putting cassia orsellio roguetrader in a to-go container inside of a thank you thank you thank you have a nice day bag (ventilated so she is safe) so i can catch-and-release her in a meadow or at the butterfly pavilion
11 notes · View notes
doedipus · 4 months
Text
boku no marie poses many important questions like "what if a guy liked a girl so he build an android replica of her but it turned out she liked him anyway so the replica was kind of just around" and "what if the replica developed her own sense of identity and desires separate from the original and the creator guy" and "what if she eventually developed a crush on the original and they kissed"
except it was a 3 episode harem ova and this all happens in like the first episode and the last 30 seconds of the last episode and it ended on them kissing and didn't like do anything with that. also what if there was a lot of imagery floating around in general implying the replica was like, a real person or something the whole time
18 notes · View notes