#takfeer

[ilmtest]

Do Not Be Hasty In Takfīr

Indeed nuṣūṣ (ie: the passages of text) concerning threats found within the Book and the Sunnah, and the literal wording of scholars passing al-takfīr wa ʿl-tasfiq (ie: the ruling of disbelief or moral depravity and extreme sinfulness) etc, does not necessitate the solidification of its obligation upon the right of a specific person unless the prerequisites are obtained and al-mawāniʿ (ie: the obstructions to the ruling being valid) are removed. فَإِنَّ نُصُوصَ " الْوَعِيدِ " الَّتِي فِي الْكِتَابِ وَالسُّنَّةِ وَنُصُوصَ الْأَئِمَّةِ بِالتَّكْفِيرِ وَالتَّفْسِيقِ وَنَحْوِ ذَلِكَ لَا يُسْتَلْزَمُ ثُبُوتُ مُوجَبِهَا فِي حَقِّ الْمُعَيَّنِ إلَّا إذَا وُجِدَتْ الشُّرُوطُ وَانْتَفَتْ الْمَوَانِعُ There is no differentiation between the fundamental and subsidiary matters in this regard. لَا فَرْقَ فِي ذَلِكَ بَيْنَ الْأُصُولِ وَالْفُرُوعِ. Ibn Taymiyyah, Majmūʿ al-Fatāwá 10/372 ابن تيمية، مجموع الفتاوى ١٠/٣٧٢ https://shamela.ws/book/7289/4957 @ilmtest [https://t.me/ilmtest]

#islam #islaam #islamic #islaamic #muslim #salafi #salafiyyah #salaf #takfir #takfeer #hastiness #hasty #excuses #excuse

[al-jadwal]

The Muslims Who Abandons Some of the Pillars

The Muslims have reached scholarly consensus over the issue of the one who does not pronounce the testimony of faith being a disbeliever. وقد اتفق المسلمون على أنه من لم يأت بالشهادتين فهو كافر، As for the four actions (pillars), they differed over whether the one who abandons them is a disbeliever or not. وأما الأعمال الأربعة فاختلفوا في تكفير تاركها، And when we say, “Ahl al-Sunnah are united over the fact that no one is to be declared a disbeliever because of a sin” ونحن إذا قلنا: أهل السنة متفقون على أنه لا يكفر بالذنب، Then we mean by this: the sins like al-zinā (ie: fornication) and drinking (intoxicants). فإنما نريد به المعاصي كالزنا والشرب، But regarding the one who abandons these four pillars, there exists well known differing. وأما هذه المباني ففي تكفير تاركها نزاع مشهور. Aḥmad's position on the issue is itself the subject of dispute. وعن أحمد في ذلك نزاع، In one narration, he makes takfīr of anyone who abandons any one of them. وإحدي الروايات عنه: أنه يكفر من ترك واحدة منها، This is the position of Abū Bakr and a number of Mālikī scholars, like Ibn Ḥabīb. وهو اختيار أبي بكر وطائفة من أصحاب مالك كابن حبيب. In a second narration, he would only make takfīr of the one who abandons prayer or zakāh only. وعنه رواية ثانية: لا يكفر إلا بترك الصلاة والزكاة فقط، In a third narration, he would only make takfīr of the one who abandons the prayer, or zakāh if he fights the Imām because of it. ورواية ثالثة: لا يكفر إلا بترك الصلاة، والزكاة إذا قاتل الإمام عليها. A fourth position (attributed to him) is that only the one who abandons the prayer is to be declared a disbeliever. ورابعة: لا يكفر إلا بترك الصلاة. And a fifth position is that whoever abandons all of them (ie: the four) is not to be declared a disbeliever due to that. وخامسة: لا يكفر بترك شيء منهن، And all of these positions are well known and held by the Salaf. وهذه أقوال معروفة للسلف. Ibn Taymiyyah, al-Īmān 1/237 ابن تيمية، الإيمان ١/٢٣٧ https://shamela.ws/book/7564/230 Telegram: https://t.me/aljadwal Tumblr: https://al-jadwal.tumblr.com

#islam #muslim #salafi #salafiyyah #abandon #pillars #prayer #prayers #zina #fornication #takfeer #takfir #manhaj #aqeedah #aqidah

[generationsalaf]

#islam #quran #hadith #ahadith #sunnah #tawhid #tawheed #salaf #salafi #takfir #takfeer

[masailworld]

تکفیر مسلم میں احتیاط لازم ہے از علامہ کمال احمد علیمی نظامی

تکفیر مسلم میں احتیاط لازم ہے از علامہ کمال احمد علیمی نظامی

تکفیر مسلم میں احتیاط لازم ہے السلام علیکم ورحمتہ اللہ وبرکاتہ کیا فرماتے ہیں مفتیان کرام مسٔلہ ذیل میں کہ ہم نے مذاق کے طور پر اپنی زبان سے یہ جملہ بولا کہ دار العلوم جو کہ دیوبندی مسلک کا مدرسہ ہے اس کی برانچ لاتے ہیں ہم اس جملہ پر قائم بھی نہیں بلکہ دیوبندیوں کو بدمذہب تسلیم کرتے ہیں یہ جملہ ایک مولوی(ظہیر عباس) صاحب کے سامنے بولا گیا مولوی صاحب اس جملے پر اس وقت کچھ بھی نہیں بولے اور اس کے…

View On WordPress

#Muslim ki takfeer me ehtyat lazim hai #تکفیر مسلم میں احتیاط لازم ہے

[tamamita]

I need a quick opinion on the Ahmadiyya, I may have done something horrible

They're Muslims. Did you do Takfeer on them?

[badrrr]

I think it’s important for us to add tags or hashtags on socials. If we’re not here any more, the next generation should be able to type in commonly used words so it’s easy for them find beneficial matters. Hashtags like :

-Muwahideen - Tawheed - UlamaofHaqq - Hakimiyyah - Takfeer - madkhalis - Kufrdunakufr -Hijrah - Muslim captives - Asraa - ShaykhAMJ

And words like that or related to what we are speaking about. There’s a lot of beneficial knowledge and reminders by the muwahideen I’ve seen on here. May Allah bless them. May Allah allow the next generation to bring victory to the Ummah. آمين

#Forthefuturecubs #Muwahideen #propermanhaj

[ynx1]

THIS IS OUR CALL

Our Call to The Ummah by Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee (rahimahullaah)

1. We believe in Allah and His Names and Attributes, as they were mentioned in the Book of Allah and in the Sunnah of Messenger of Allah (sallalahu alaihi wasallam), without tahreef (distortion), nor ta’weel (figurative interpretation), nor tamtheel (making a likeness), nor tashbeeh (resemblance), nor ta’teel (denial).

2. We love the Companions (radiAllahu anhum) of the Messenger of Allah (sallalahu alaihi wasallam), and we hate those who speak against them. We believe that to speak ill of them is to speak ill of the Religion, because they are the ones who conveyed it to us. And we love the Family of the Prophet (sallalahu alaihi wasallam) with love that is permitted by the sharee’ah. ‘Imraan Ibn Husayn (radiAllahu anhu) said, “O people! Learn the knowledge of the religion from us, if you do not do so, then you will certainly be misguided.” (al-Kifaayah (p.15) of al-Khateeb al Baghdaadee)

3. We love the People of Hadeeth and all of the Salaf of the Ummah from Ahlus-Sunnah. Imam Shaatibee (d.790H) (rahimahullah) said, “The Salafu-Saalih, the Companions, the taabi’een and their successors knew the Qur’aan, its sciences and its meanings the best.” (al-Muwaafiqaat (2/79) of ash-Shaatibee).

4. We despise ‘ilmul-kalaam (knowledge of theological rhetoric), and we view it to be from amongst the greatest reasons for the division in the Ummah.

5. We do not accept anything from the books of fiqh (jurisprudence), nor from the books of tafseer (explanation of the Qur’aan), nor from the ancient stories, nor from the Seerah (biography) of the Prophet (sallalahu alaihi wasallam), except that which has confirmed from Allah or from His Messenger (sallalahu alaihi wasallam). We do not mean that we have rejected them, nor do we claim that we are not in need of them. Rather, we benefit from the discoveries of our Scholars and th jurists and other than them. However, we do not accept a ruling, except with an authentic proof.

6. We do not write in our books, nor do we cover in our lessons, nor do we give sermons with anything except the Qur’aan or the authentic and authoritative hadeeth. And we detest that emanates from many books and admonishers in terms of false stories and weak and fabricated ahaadeeth. ‘Abdullah Ibnul-Mubaarak (d.181H) (rahimahullah) said, “The authentic ahaadeeth are sufficient and the weak ahaadeeth are not needed.” (al-Jaami’ li-Aklaaqir-Raawee (2/159) of as-Suyootee).

7. We do not perform takfeer upon any Muslim due to any sin, except Shirk with Allah, or the abandonment of Prayer, or apostasy. We seek refuge in Allah for that.

8. We believe that the Qur’aan is the Speech of Allah, it is not created.

9. We hold that our ‘obligation is to co-operate with the group that traverses the methodology of the Book and the Sunnah, and what thee Salah of the Ummah were upon: in terms of calling to Allah the Glorified, and being sincere in worship of Him, and warning from Shirk,, innovations, and disobedience, and to advise all of the groups that oppose this (from a fatwa by the Committee of Major Scholars dated: 11/16/1417. (no. 18870). It was signed by al-‘Allamah ‘Abdul-Azeez Ibn Baaz, Shaykh Abdul Azeez ibn Abdullah aalush-Shaykh, Shaykh Abdullah Ibn Abdur-Rahmaan al-Ghudayyaan, Shaykh Bakr Ibn Abduullah Aboo Zayd, and Shaykh Saalih Ibn Fawzaan al-Fawzaan). So co-opeating upon righteousness and piety (taqwaa) and mutual advisisng necessitates warning against evil and not co-operating with the wicked (From the words of Shaykh Ibn Baaz in al-Furqaan magazine (issue no. 14, p. 15).

10. We do not deem it correct to revolt against the Muslim rulers as long as they are Muslims, nor do we feel that revolutions bring about reconciliation. Rather, they corrupt the community.

11. We hold that this multiplicity of present day parties is a reason for the division of the Muslim and their weakness. So therefore we set about ‘freeing the minds from the fetters of blind-following and the darkness of sectarianism and party sprit. ‘(Fiqhul-Waaqi’ (p.49) of al-Albaanee)

12. We restrict our understanding of the Book of Allah and of the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (sallalahu alaihi wasallam) to the understanding of the Salah of the Ummah from the Scholars of hadeeth, not the blind-followers of their individuals. Rathe, we take the truth from wherever it comes. And we know that there are those who claim Salafiyyah, yet Salafiyyah is free from them, since they bring to the society that Allah has prohibited. We believe in ‘cultivating the young generation upon this Islaam, purified from all that we have mentioned, giving to them a correct Islamic education from the start without any influence from the disbelieving western educations.’ (Fiqhul-Waaqi (p.51) of alAlbaanee).

13. We believe politics is a part of the Religion, and those who try to separate the Religion from politics are only attempting to destroy the Religion and to spread chaos.

14. We believe there will be no honour or victory for the Muslims until they return to the Book of Allah and to the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (sallalahu alaihi wasallam).

15. We oppose those who divide the Religion into trivialities and important issues. And we know that this is a destructive da’wah.

16. We oppose those who put down the knowledge of the Sunnah, and say that this is not the time for it. Likewise, we oppose those who put down acting upon the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (sallalahu alaihi wasallam).

17. Our Da’wah and our’aqeedah is more beloved to us than our own selves, our wealth and our offspring. So we are not prepared to part with it for gold, nor silver. We say this so that no one may have hope in buying out our da’wah, nor should he think that it is possible for him to purchase it from us for deenaar or dirham.

18. We love the present day Scholars of the Sunnah and hope to benefit from them and regret the passing away of many of them. Imaam Maalik (rahimahullah) (d.179H) said, “The knowledge of hadeeth is your flesh and blood and you will be asked concerning it on the Day of Judgement, so look who you are taking it from.” (al-Muhaddithul-Faasil (p.416) and al-Kifaayah (p21) of al-Khateeb).

19. We do not accept a fatwa except from the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (sallalahu alaihi wasallam).

These are glimpses into our ‘aqeedah and our da’wah. So if one has any objection to this, then we are prepared to accept advice if it is truthful, and to refute it if it is erroneous, and to avoid it if it is stubborn rejection. And Allah knows best.

This explanation of our call has been summarized from Tarjumah Abee ‘Abdur-Rahmaan Muqbil Ibn Haadee al-Waadi’ee (p. 135-142) of Muqbil Ibn Haadee with minor additions from other sources.

[mon0theist]

Imam ‘Abdur-Rahmaan Ibn Hasan An-Najdi said:

“So whenever we say, “None should be worshipped except Allah, none should be called upon except Allah, absolute hope and trust should not be placed in anyone except Allah and similar things for all the various types of Ibaadah which is not meant for anyone except Allah alone; and when we say that whosoever directs Ibaadah to other than Allah, then he is a kaafir and mushrik-they come and shout to us:“You are upon bid’ah, you have made Takfeer upon the Ummah of Muhammad, you are Khawaarij, you are innovators.”

{Ad-Durar As-Saniyyah, 11/448-449}

#Islam began as something strange #and it will return to being strange just as it began #fa tuba lil ghuraba

[manhajsalafiyyah]

@shamsidawah •Anyone who rebels against a leader he is a Khariji.

•Making Takfeer on Muslim Leaders is Major Bid’ah

🎙Shamsi حفظه الله @dusdawah

[ahlulhaditht]

Arabic translated below, in the news in the past few days ....

Above reads :

Dangerous development, a Saudi Fatwa makes takfeer of bin Zayd because of his Abrahamic Family House

The Fatwa doesn't mention him by name, but it's is very clear that it is about him and his Da'wah for the Unity of Religions. It is long and developed in many points. Who does not make takfeer of the disbelievers is a disbeliever says the Fatwa...After all, it's clearly from Nawaqid-ul-Islām - Nullifiers of Islām...

Reading the news nowadays brings to mind the ahadīth about the end of times, and Kitāb al-Fitan by Imām al-Bukhārī....

1) Chapter: “And fear the Fitnah which affects not in particular those among you who do wrong….”

(1)بَابُ مَا جَاءَ فِي قَوْلِ اللَّهِ تَعَالَى: {وَاتَّقُوا فِتْنَةً لاَ تُصِيبَنَّ الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا مِنْكُمْ خَاصَّةً}

اللهم

اللهم جنبنا الفتن ما ضهر منها و ما بطن

O Allāh protect us from Fitan (trials & tribulations) what is apparent from them and hidden

#ahlulhadith #ahlulsunnah #islamicreminder #quran&sunnah #manhaj salaf #sunnah #islampost #salafi

[islamicboard]

New Thread: Why do some people spend more of their time making takfeer of others.... https://www.islamicboard.com/showthread.php?t=134360451&goto=newpost&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr

[ilmtest]

Be Careful Of The Takfīrīs Online

And the truth in this is: a statement can be kufr (ie: disbelief), like the statements of al-Jahmiyyah who said that Allah does not speak and that he can not be seen in the Hereafter. وَالتَّحْقِيقُ فِي هَذَا: أَنَّ الْقَوْلَ قَدْ يَكُونُ كُفْرًا كَمَقَالَاتِ الْجَهْمِيَّة الَّذِينَ قَالُوا: إنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يَتَكَلَّمُ وَلَا يَرَى فِي الْآخِرَةِ؛ But this maybe hidden for some people, so we say that (generally) anyone who says this is declared a disbeliever, وَلَكِنْ قَدْ يَخْفَى عَلَى بَعْضِ النَّاسِ أَنَّهُ كُفْرٌ فَيُطْلِقُ الْقَوْلَ بِتَكْفِيرِ الْقَائِلِ؛ Like the salaf said: Whoever says: the Qurʾān is makhlūq (ie: created), is a kāfir (ie: disbeliever). كَمَا قَالَ السَّلَفُ مَنْ قَالَ: الْقُرْآنُ مَخْلُوقٌ فَهُوَ كَافِرٌ And whoever says that Allah cannot be seen in the hereafter is a kāfir, وَمَنْ قَالَ: إنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يُرَى فِي الْآخِرَةِ فَهُوَ كَافِرٌ But we do not declare an individual person as a as a kāfir until al-ḥujjah (ie: evidence) has been established (upon them). وَلَا يَكْفُرُ الشَّخْصُ الْمُعَيَّنُ حَتَّى تَقُومَ عَلَيْهِ الْحُجَّةُ. Ibn Taymiyyah, Majmūʿ al-Fatāwá 7/619 ابن تيمية، مجموع الفتاوى ٧/٦١٩ https://shamela.ws/book/7289/3659 @ilmtest [https://t.me/ilmtest]

#islam #islaam #islamic #islaamic #muslim #salafi #salafiyyah #salaf #takfeer #takfir #kufr #jahmiyyah #creed #manhaj #muslims

[sagarparvizali]

What If Shaikhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah Saw Situation of Many Amongst Groups of Illegal Partisanship – By Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee

What If Shaikhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah Saw Situation of Many Amongst Groups of Illegal Partisanship – By Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy. Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee Al-Madkhalee [may Allaah preserve him] stated: After speaking about those – amongst the different factions of the Jahmiyah, the Khawaarij, the Rawaafid and the Qadariyyah, and the reason behind such Takfeer – who excommunicate (Muslims) based on falsehood , Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah [may Allaah have…

View On WordPress

[liesexposer]

It Is Not Permissible to Exalt The Innovators

(One who praises Innovators is One of Two)

Shaykh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan ﷾

حكم توقير أهل البدع والثناء عليهم - الشيخ الفوزان ﷾

Question: Is it Permissible to Exalt The Innovators?

Answer: It is not permissible to exalt and praise the innovators even if they have some truth with them. That is because raising and praising them will spread their bidah and place them amongst the sincere ones-those who are taken as examples amongst distinguished men of this Ummah. The Salaf warned against having trust for the innovators, (warned against) praising them and their gatherings. In this regard, Asad Ibn Musa (رحمه الله) wrote: ”Beware of being a brother of the innovator (by association) or a companion of his, or one whom you sit with; for indeed it has been narrated that ‘Whoever sits with a person of innovation has left the protection of Allaah and is entrusted to himself’.

The innovators must be warned against and kept away from even if they have some truth with them. Indeed, the most astray are not devoid of some truth, but as long as they have with them innovation, opposition and sinful views, it is not permissible to praise and exalt them. It is impermissible to not have an objection against their innovation because this spreads bidah, belittles the Sunnah and by way of this the innovator will emerge and become a guide for the Ummah.

As for giving consideration (to the fact) that the innovation has some truth, this does not justify praising him. This is -to a far greater extent- against what is of overriding benefit and it is known in relation to a principle in the religion that averting harm takes precedence over seeking that which is of benefit. And with regards to having hatred for the innovator, the harm that is averted from the Ummah is weightier than the benefit possessed by the innovator. And had we adhered to this concept (i.e. praising the innovator because he has some truth with him), then no one would have been judged to be misguided and declared an innovator. That is because there is not an innovator except that he has some truth and adherence to the Sunnah. The innovator (may) neither be a disbeliever nor be in opposition to all the Islamic legislation; rather he is either an innovator in some or most of the affairs. However, if the innovation is particularly related to affairs of Creed and Methodology, then the affair is dangerous indeed because it will become an example (to be followed); innovation will spread and the innovators will become active in spreading their innovation.

So, this person who praises the innovators and makes their affair obscure to the people -due to some truth they (i.e. innovators) have – is one of two (people): Either he is one ignorant of the methodology of the pious predecessors and their stance against the innovators, so neither is it permissible for this ignorant one to speak nor is it permissible for the Muslims to listen to him; or he is one who has an objection to the truth because he knows the danger of innovation and the innovators, but he wishes to spread innovations. Nevertheless, this is a dangerous affair and it is not permissible to be lackadaisical with regards to innovation and its people, whatever that may be.

[Source: An Excerpt from At-Tabdee Wat-Tafseeq Wat Takfeer. Page: 72-76. slightly paraphrased]

السؤال: ما حكم من يوقر أهل البدع ويحترمهم ويثني عليهم بأنهم يطبقون حكم الإسلام مع علمه ببدعهم وفي بعض الأحيان عندما يذكرهم في الدروس العامة يقول : مع التحفظ على بعض المواقف عند هؤلاء المبتدعة أو يقول : بغض النظر عن ما عند هؤلاء المبتدعة الذين يحترمهم هذا القائل ويثني عليهم ويدافع عنهم لهم كلام مكتوب ومسجّل فيه طعن في السنة وتجهيل للصحابة وغمز للنبي صلى الله عليه و سلم فما حكم هذا القائل وهل يحذر من أقواله هذه ؟

الجواب: لا يجوز تعظيم المبتدعة والثناء عليهم ولو كان عندهم شيء من الحق : لأن مدحهم والثناء عليهم يروّج بدعتهم ويجعل المبتدعة في صفوف المقتدى بهم من رجالات هذه الأمة والسلف حذّرونا من الثقة بالمبتدعة ومن الثناء عليهم و من مجالستهم وفيما كتب به أسد بن موسى: " وإياك أن يكون لك من البدع أخ أو جليس أو صاحب فإنه جاء الأثر: (من جالس صاحب بدعة نزعت منه العصمة و وكل إلى نفسه ومن مشى إلى صاحب بدعة مشى إلى هدم الإسلام ) .

والمبتدعة يجب التحذير منهم ويجب الإبتعاد عنهم ولو كان عندهم شيء من الحق فإن غالب الضُّلال لا يخلون من شيء من الحق ولكن ما دام عندهم ابتداع وعندهم مخالفات وعندهم أفكار سيئة فلا يجوز الثناء عليهم ولا يجوز مدحهم ولا يجوز التغاضي عن بدعتهم لأن في هذا ترويجا للبدعة وتهوين من أمر السنة وبهذه الطريقة يظهر المبتدعة ويكونون قادة للأمة _ لا قدر الله _ . فالواجب التحذير منهم وفي أئمة السنة الذين ليس عندهم ابتداع في كل عصر _ ولله الحمد _ فيهم الكفاية للأمة وهم القدوة .

فالواجب اتّباع المستقيم على السنة الذي ليس عنده بدعة وأما المبتدع فالواجب التحذير منه والتشنيع عليه حتى يحذره الناس وحتى ينقمع هو وأتباعه و أما كون عند ه شيء من الحق فهذا لا يبرر الثناء عليه أكثر من المصلحة ومعلوم قاعدة الدين : ( أن درء المفاسد مقدّم على جلب المصالح ) وفي معاداة المبتدع درء مفسدة عن الأمة تُرَجَّحُ على ما عنده من المصلحة

المزعومة إن كانت و لو أخذنا بهذا المبدأ لم يضلل أحد و لم يبدّع أحد

لأنه ما من مبتدع إلا وعنده شيء من الحق وعنده شيء من الإلتزام . المبتدع ليس كافرا محضا ولا مخالفا للشريعة كلها وإنما هو مبتدع في بعض الأمور أو في غالب الأمور وخصوصا إذا كان الإبتداع في العقيدة و في المنهج فإن الأمر خطير لأن هذا يصبح قدوة ومن حينئذ تنتشر البدع في الأمة وينشط المبتدعة في ترويج بدعهم ،

فهذا الذي يمدح المبتدعة ويشبّه على الناس بما عندهم من الحق هذا أحد أمرين : إما جاهل بمنهج السلف وموقفهم من المبتدعة وهذا الجاهل لا يجوز أن يتكلم ولا يجوز للمسلمين أن يستمعوا له و إما أنه مغرض لأنه يعرف خطر البدعة ويعرف خطر المبتدعة ولكنه مغرض يريد أن يروّج للبدعة فعلى كل ، هذا أمر خطير وأمر لا يجوز التساهل في البدعة وأهلها مهما كانت .

ظاهرة التبديع والتفسيق والتكفير وضوابطها ـ الشيخ الفوزان

Trans.: salaficentre.com/2020/01/17/it-is-not-permissible-to-exalt-the-innovators-by-shaikh-saaleh-al-fawzaan/

mtws.posthaven.com/its-not-permissible-to-praise-the-innovator-e/

[abukhadeejahsp]

A brief response to Yasir Qadhi's pathetic and futile tirade against the Scholar and Reviver of the Sunnah, Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhāb (died 1206 AH)

Article: "A brief response to Yasir Qadhi's pathetic and futile tirade against the Scholar and Reviver of the Sunnah, Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhāb (died 1206 AH)." Read and share.

This ignorant, untruthful innovator Yasir Qadhi stated in a video whilst waving his hands as if in the excitement of a new discovery talks of the differences between Ibn Taymiyyah (died 728H) and Ibn Abdul-Wahhāb (died 1206H). He claims, “There are profound differences between the two. Of them, the most important one is Ibn Taymiyyah did not make takfīr of his opponents that did the same things…

View On WordPress

#excommunication #Muhammad b. Abdul-Wahhaab #saudi salafism #takfeer #takfir #wahabi #wahhabi #wahhabism #yasir qadhi

[al-jadwal]

Those Who Make Takfeer of Rulers From Behind Their Keyboards

And the Qaʿdiyyah are, in most cases, more dangerous than the khawārij themselves. Since, speech, inciting hatred within the hearts and provoking the common-folks against the rulers has the most profound effect upon the souls; especially when it comes from a man who is an eloquent speaker who dupes the people with his tongue and disguises it with the Sunnah. و" القعدية " غالباً أخطر من الخوارج أنفسهم؛ إذ أن الكلام وشحن القلوب وإثارة العامة على ولاة الأمر له أبلغ الأثر في النفوس وخاصة إذا خرج من رجل بليغ متكلم يخدع الناس بلسانه وتلبسه بالسّنة. Shaykh Ṣāliḥ b. Fawzān al-Fawzān, al-Ajwibah al-Mufīdah ʿan Asʾilah al-Manāhij al-Jadīdah 1/119 صالح الفوزان، الأجوبة المفيدة عن أسئلة المناهج الجديدة ١/١١٩ http://shamela.ws/rep.php/book/1685 Website: https://www.al-jadwal.com Facebook: https://facebook.com/aljadwal1 Instagram: https://instagram.com/al_jadwal Telegram: https://t.me/aljadwal Tumblr: https://al-jadwal.tumblr.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/al_jadwal

#islam #salaf #salafi #takfeer #takfir #khawarij #khawaarij #qadiyyah #ahmad musa jibril #musa jibril #khariji #khaariji #extremism #extremist #terrorist #terrorism