the-good-takes

[the-good-takes]

I have them blocked on main so I don't see it, but I've been told they responded to this. So...

What I saw was their underaged brother following an account where they posted nudes and other nafw content. And they let him KEEP following until enough people said something about it. THEN they started telling their brother to fuck off, but at no point before that did they say a thing about it that I'm aware of

It's old news at this point and doesn't really have much to do with what's going on. I haven't been friends with the person they harassed in a few years now, so I don't really know why the brother stuff being brought up again when, as bad as it was, that wasn't part of the situation with their harassment victim who they contributed to the death of

I don't intend to get involved further in this, so please do not send anymore asks about this. I don't even know much of anything that's more recent than two years ago, so I'm not the best source of info on the situation ANYWAY when it comes to more recent events. All I know currently is that the victim is at the end of their life, and wouldn't be if this person (and a group of others that includes an actual rapist) hadn't incited a massive harassment campaign against them over cartoons, that led to them being doxxed, unable to work, or afford health insurance to treat their chronic illnesses

hey not sure if this blog is still active anymore, but how did you hear about aquabiooms and their brother?

I witnessed their interactions first-hand. They were being like that with their brother on twitter and didn't try to hide it until people started calling them on it

#incest mention #rape mention

[the-good-takes]

hey not sure if this blog is still active anymore, but how did you hear about aquabiooms and their brother?

I witnessed their interactions first-hand. They were being like that with their brother on twitter and didn't try to hide it until people started calling them on it

[the-good-takes]

remember how i said once ace exclus were bored they’d attack the next “acceptable” minority, possibly advancing it against trans people. Lmao I’ve never been more right in my life. All these anti trans men people literally be out here saying trans men don’t face oppression, and therefor shouldn’t have access to trans spaces because we don’t need them. Ace exclus need to answer for what they’ve allowed to happen. Because its *you* who paved the way for this anti trans men movement, its you who allowed people to bully, harass, and stalk queers yall didn’t like. And now those queers are fucking TRANS PEOPLE.

This one really sounds like “Ace people don’t face prejudice, its misplaced homophobia!”

And so many more. Ace Exclus fucking paved the way for this shit.

#transphobia #transandrophobia #transmedicalism #aspec discourse #rape tw #sexual assault tw #suicide tw #abuse tw

[the-good-takes]

Maybe my phrasing is weird, but I mean it's medical in the sense that a neurotypical brain doesn't work like ours does. Maybe that's something I should think on, though, since now that I'm saying it out loud, neurodivergent/different doesn't mean it's necessarily a medical issue

Thanks for asking! Now I'm asking the same question myself

Honestly I think we should call sysmeds something else (like syskeepers, syswalls, something to make it clear still that they exclude and/or deny the existence of different kinds of systems) and here is why

The "med" in sysmed stands for "medical." I know it was used to show the similarities between transmeds and exclusionary systems, but they are separate issues with separate problems (the problem with transmedicalism is that they treat transness as inherently medical/disordered. With systems, they ARE medical/disordered by nature, no matter what caused the system to form, so this just makes the term "sysmed" redundant and confusing. The problem with sysmeds is ableism and denying other systems the right to call ourselves systems and enter plural safe spaces)

Comparing the issue to transmedicalism, while the exlusionary mindsets are similar, can be triggering for some trans people, even those who are against exclusionism

It can confuse people who are new to the discourse/argument, and frankly I think it wouldn't be hard to make it more clear

Exclusionary systems are not good, obviously, but their comfort and triggers matter just as much as ours. We can call them exclusionary without calling them something harmful to do it, especially if it can harm people uninvolved with the discourse as well (ie trans people)

Sysmed tucutes/mogai/radinclus exist

To add to the above point, seeing words similar to "transmed" is sometimes triggering for those of us who are tucute/mogai/radinclus, or can bring up bad memories relating to to what we've had to ho through due to transmedicalism

There's probably stuff I'm not thinking about too

TLDR: Sysmed as a term is inaccurate and confusing, so we should call them something else instead. Syskeepers, syswalls, Solesystems, etc might work better since they clarify that the problem is exclusion and denial of other systems existing, not of medicalizing a disorder/illness. I'm open to other suggestions for new labels to call them!

(Note: I come from a mixed-origin system, am very endo-friendly, and am tulpa-neutral [as I don't know much about tulpa stuff or thoughtform]. I am open to friendly, civil discussion from those who are NOT sysmeds, if they have suggestions or disagree with something I said)

#reflection is good and i appreciate you for bringing attention to this actually

[the-good-takes]

Anti-endos and "endo-neutrals" stay away please. I believe endogenic and mixed-origin systems can have DID/OSDD as I literally am a mixed-origin system with OSDD. We will not get along if you think I "can't use medical terms" for myself just because you think you SOMEHOW magically know everything about an extremely under-researched group of disorders. If you agree with my post, great, but stay away from me because you are one of the people who I want nothing to do with and we will NOT get along

Honestly I think we should call sysmeds something else (like syskeepers, syswalls, something to make it clear still that they exclude and/or deny the existence of different kinds of systems) and here is why

The "med" in sysmed stands for "medical." I know it was used to show the similarities between transmeds and exclusionary systems, but they are separate issues with separate problems (the problem with transmedicalism is that they treat transness as inherently medical/disordered. With systems, they ARE medical/disordered by nature, no matter what caused the system to form, so this just makes the term "sysmed" redundant and confusing. The problem with sysmeds is ableism and denying other systems the right to call ourselves systems and enter plural safe spaces)

Comparing the issue to transmedicalism, while the exlusionary mindsets are similar, can be triggering for some trans people, even those who are against exclusionism

It can confuse people who are new to the discourse/argument, and frankly I think it wouldn't be hard to make it more clear

Exclusionary systems are not good, obviously, but their comfort and triggers matter just as much as ours. We can call them exclusionary without calling them something harmful to do it, especially if it can harm people uninvolved with the discourse as well (ie trans people)

Sysmed tucutes/mogai/radinclus exist

To add to the above point, seeing words similar to "transmed" is sometimes triggering for those of us who are tucute/mogai/radinclus, or can bring up bad memories relating to to what we've had to ho through due to transmedicalism

There's probably stuff I'm not thinking about too

TLDR: Sysmed as a term is inaccurate and confusing, so we should call them something else instead. Syskeepers, syswalls, Solesystems, etc might work better since they clarify that the problem is exclusion and denial of other systems existing, not of medicalizing a disorder/illness. I'm open to other suggestions for new labels to call them!

(Note: I come from a mixed-origin system, am very endo-friendly, and am tulpa-neutral [as I don't know much about tulpa stuff or thoughtform]. I am open to friendly, civil discussion from those who are NOT sysmeds, if they have suggestions or disagree with something I said)

[the-good-takes]

Honestly I think we should call sysmeds something else (like syskeepers, syswalls, something to make it clear still that they exclude and/or deny the existence of different kinds of systems) and here is why

The "med" in sysmed stands for "medical." I know it was used to show the similarities between transmeds and exclusionary systems, but they are separate issues with separate problems (the problem with transmedicalism is that they treat transness as inherently medical/disordered. With systems, they ARE medical/disordered by nature, no matter what caused the system to form, so this just makes the term "sysmed" redundant and confusing. The problem with sysmeds is ableism and denying other systems the right to call ourselves systems and enter plural safe spaces)

Comparing the issue to transmedicalism, while the exlusionary mindsets are similar, can be triggering for some trans people, even those who are against exclusionism

It can confuse people who are new to the discourse/argument, and frankly I think it wouldn't be hard to make it more clear

Exclusionary systems are not good, obviously, but their comfort and triggers matter just as much as ours. We can call them exclusionary without calling them something harmful to do it, especially if it can harm people uninvolved with the discourse as well (ie trans people)

Sysmed tucutes/mogai/radinclus exist

To add to the above point, seeing words similar to "transmed" is sometimes triggering for those of us who are tucute/mogai/radinclus, or can bring up bad memories relating to to what we've had to ho through due to transmedicalism

There's probably stuff I'm not thinking about too

TLDR: Sysmed as a term is inaccurate and confusing, so we should call them something else instead. Syskeepers, syswalls, Solesystems, etc might work better since they clarify that the problem is exclusion and denial of other systems existing, not of medicalizing a disorder/illness. I'm open to other suggestions for new labels to call them!

(Note: I come from a mixed-origin system, am very endo-friendly, and am tulpa-neutral [as I don't know much about tulpa stuff or thoughtform]. I am open to friendly, civil discussion from those who are NOT sysmeds, if they have suggestions or disagree with something I said)

#syscourse #endogenic systems #traumagenic systems #endo safe #mixed origin systems #tulpagenic systems #thoughtform systems #transmed mention

[the-good-takes]

Here! I do posts, discussions, and discourse about mogai (primarily intersex and nonbibary experiences, at least my own), proship, and mental health topics!

Is there anyone mogai blogs run by proshippers

[the-good-takes]

Adding onto this, some new information has recently come to light:

Kyle Carrozza, the creator of Cartoon Network series Mighty Magiswords, had been sharing this victim's pornographic drawings to his employees in an attempt to direct abuse their way.

Not only is this an EXTREME violation of the victim's boundaries, especially considering that his employees are the victim's previous friends and coworkers, but this is also an example of him sexually harassing his employees. No employer should EVER be showing pornographic or otherwise sexual content to their employees, ESPECIALLY without their consent, ESPECIALLY at work or in other professional settings, and ESPECIALLY in an attempt to ruin thw life of a disabled victim of recent rape and repeated sexual assaults.

To make matters worse, Kyle Carrozza teamed up with not only Holly Meadow Disch (who had attempted to groom the victim in the past, and also did the other things listed in the post above, and even later BRAGGED about abusing the victim) and Jay Goldstein (another abuser), Kyle even TEAMED UP WITH THE VICTIM'S RAPIST to ruin this person's life. And also with aquabiooms on twitter, who had groomed their underage brother and interacted sexually with him, then later tried to claim their brother was the one instigating (or would downplay the sexual interaction as "joking about pap smears" when they had been showing their underage brother pictures of penises, talking about sex and being horny, and even allowing him to follow their 18+ account where they posted nudes). So Kyle Carrozza DEFENDED AND UPLIFTED SEVERAL SEXUAL ABUSERS AND ATTEMPTED MURDERERS to ruin the life of someone he called his friend.

All over the victim drawing uncomfortable subject matter. Just as many other professional artists in the animation industry do. Just as many survivors of trauma do.

What a world we live in.

As a reminder, here are the known names of the people responsible for the sexual and violent abuse this poor person is facing: Kyle Carrozza, Holly Meadow Disch, and Jay Goldstein.

Remember those names, and spread them like wild fire. They NEED to be held accountable. This situation should be the FIRST THING that shows up if you google ANY of their names.

I don’t know if you’ve heard, but the situation is all over Twitter at the moment. Unfortunately two people, specifically Pro Shippers, committed su*c*de due to harassment… One of them was a 15 year old. A third person was doxxed and lost their job.

The opinions in the Anti Shipper parts of Twitter vary from feeling guilty, sorry and angry, to celebrations and saying if a Pro Shipper kills themselves, they deserve it.

I want to stay out of the discourse, but I want to say that this isn’t the first time this happened, and it will continue to happen as long as people give more value to fictional characters than to real people. Someone’s death, specifically a su*c*de of young people, is no reason to celebrate. At all.

That’s all I’m going to say. I wish the families of the victims the best. Please, remember that cyberbullying is a very real form of abuse, and you can get help. You deserve help.

#jay goldstein #holly meadow disch #kyle carrozza #mighty magiswords #lemonhead and lollipup #lemon head and lollipup #cartoon network

[the-good-takes]

What the fuck are you even talking about. Where did you see me mention almost any of that

Has anyone else noticed that the anti-mogai bitches who say shit like “mental illnesses aren’t lgbt” are the same ones who think being trans requires you to have dysphoria, a mental illness

It’s almost like transmeds and anti-mogai types have no idea what they’re saying half the time

#okay so transphobes cant read now #transphobia tw #transmed stupidity

[the-good-takes]

Sorry 2 drag up old discourse but do you have sources on Holly grooming handsomehugs? I don't doubt she and jay were abusers but did HH ever come forward about this?

They did on their twitter, yes. I don't think I should say more than what they have publicly said themself, so I would suggest checking their twitter if you want to know more

[the-good-takes]

I'm proship but you admitted to grooming two kids last year. You exchanged nudes with, did sexual roleplay with, and "dated" them. You are 25. Sit the fuck down

i could say the same damn thing about kids in anti communities

[the-good-takes]

I know the full situation of the person who got doxxed. They are a storyboard artist who was slandered for cartoon porn they drew.

Holly Meadow Disch (known best for her webcomic "Lemon Head and Lollipup") released this person's personal information, even contacting their family and friends on Facebook, with false allegations of this person being a child predator. Their "proof" was cartoon porn. Holly had abused this victim previously, and had even attempted to groom said victim when they were younger. Holly also spammed people on twitter with their "proof," sending the porn to seemingly random strangers from a burner account in an attempt to ruin the victim's reputation (making many people uncomfortable in the process).

Jay Goldstein was the other doxxer involved. This person made a huge callout thread on Twitter, spreading the same false allegations. This resulted in the victim NOT getting fired, as they are not currently working. However, their slander DID result in the artist getting blacklisted from certain companies in the animation industry.

All of this three weeks after this person, who is disabled and already has a difficult time finding work, had lost their previous job after being raped.

Three weeks ago.

These people are trying to kill a disabled victim of recent rape.

Spread their names, and make sure the entire industry knows that Jay Goldstein and Holly Meadow Disch are abusive people who will try to KILL those they see as competition.

I don’t know if you’ve heard, but the situation is all over Twitter at the moment. Unfortunately two people, specifically Pro Shippers, committed su*c*de due to harassment… One of them was a 15 year old. A third person was doxxed and lost their job.

The opinions in the Anti Shipper parts of Twitter vary from feeling guilty, sorry and angry, to celebrations and saying if a Pro Shipper kills themselves, they deserve it.

I want to stay out of the discourse, but I want to say that this isn’t the first time this happened, and it will continue to happen as long as people give more value to fictional characters than to real people. Someone’s death, specifically a su*c*de of young people, is no reason to celebrate. At all.

That’s all I’m going to say. I wish the families of the victims the best. Please, remember that cyberbullying is a very real form of abuse, and you can get help. You deserve help.

#jay goldstein #holly meadow disch

[the-good-takes]

What is your opinion on MOGAI genders? Do you think they cause any hindrance in the recognition of trans people by delegitimizing gender as a construct that should be "taken seriously"?

I challenge anyone who thinks that queer activism hinges on being “taken seriously” to question what “taken seriously” means to them.

Taken seriously by who? Why are those people in charge of this in the first place? If there’s no good reason for them to be in charge, then why are they, and why should we appeal to them?

What metric are they using to judge what deserves to be taken seriously- and is that metric equitable, just, and helpful? Or is that metric itself a tool of oppression? Why should we appeal to that metric?

This is what we’re talking about when we say “respectability politics”. Respectability politics appeal to the system. It says the problem here is not that people are being excluded, only that their exclusion is too inflexible.

Sure, it’s wrong to exclude people for who they’re attracted to, or what their gender is; those are intrinsic qualities. But they can change how they dress, and act, and the language they use to describe themselves. They can change their values, their religions, their cultures... and if they do all that, then maybe the system can “take them seriously”.

We don’t need to assimilate. We don’t need to change ourselves, kill our subcultures, erase our most marginalized, and cut up our language until it fits into a box that cis and straight people deem “respectable”.

That isn’t liberation. It won’t earn us the rights, resources, and protections we need. There will never be a point at which we are “respectable” enough for the cis and straight to finally say, oh, I guess we can help you out now. They want us to be “respectable” so that they don’t have to think about us anymore; so that we don’t exist to them. Queer people want to be “respectable” so they can be allowed into cis/straight society as individuals, the rest of the community be damned.

But what about the people who can’t be “respectable”, because the rules were built to exclude them? What about the people who don’t want to be “respectable”, because living honestly is synonymous with living happily? Is happiness a privilege that should be reserved for cis and straight people?

I’m willing to fight for fellow queer people to use the words that make them happy. That’s what queer activism is, to me. I hope that’s why we’re all here.

#mogai #lgbt #yes this

[the-good-takes]

Okay I didn't read the full reply, so my response didn't exactly work. I apologize.

HOWEVER

Your assumption that I don't understand social norms is false. I literally just think of gender a different way than neurotypical people do (such as, say, the fact that they think THEIR understanding of it is universal)

As for being mspec gay, there's two reasons!

1. My gender affects my orientation. I am attracted to more than one gender, thus the mspec part. However, due to the nature of my gender, any relationship I enter will always be gay, never straight, no matter my partner's gender.

2. I have alters. Some are mspec. Some are homosexual. We share a body.

Bonus 3. I feel comfortable with the label, which has existed since before you were born, and frankly the fact that you think ANYONE should be forced to explain their identities with your sealioning asses is shitty as hell

Anyway, back to the original point! Sex is a spectrum! I am proof of it! About 1/10 people are proof of it! Intersex people are not an abnormality or deformation!

So yeah. Fuck you

your "sex is not a spectrum" argument against tucutes is terf rhetoric. do better

How is sex an spectrum tho, y'all just see something mildly similar to what terfs say and go wild.

[the-good-takes]

Me being neurodivergent doesn't mean I'm stupid dipshit

It's clear that you pride yourself on being a bigoted dipshit, so you can catch this block

your "sex is not a spectrum" argument against tucutes is terf rhetoric. do better

How is sex an spectrum tho, y'all just see something mildly similar to what terfs say and go wild.

[the-good-takes]

You not understanding my gender doesn't mean I don't, it means you're a dumbass! I understand it just fine. Cis people shut up about gender please, they keep pretending to know shit

your "sex is not a spectrum" argument against tucutes is terf rhetoric. do better

How is sex an spectrum tho, y'all just see something mildly similar to what terfs say and go wild.

#idiots assemble

[the-good-takes]

It's almost like by neurodivergence and being intersex affect my perception of gender or something

Anyway! Perisex allocishets don't get a fucking opinion on intracommunity issues

your "sex is not a spectrum" argument against tucutes is terf rhetoric. do better

How is sex an spectrum tho, y'all just see something mildly similar to what terfs say and go wild.