Tumgik
nerdiepolitics · 11 days
Text
I have a hard time talking about American law enforcement, because I have ptsd (like a therapist told me this and everything) from my own experiences with cops and because it's so balls quaking insane.
Like, a cop in the United States can pull you over for any reason. Which is a nice way of saying no reason, because literally anything can be used after the fact as justification. A cop can say its cuz you looked at him, or didnt look at him, or it looked like you were holding something, or looked like you were driving too perfectly for it to be natural. It's insane.
There are apparently no circumstances where a cop can't just kill you. The line the courts have applied is "reasonably believed" you were a threat, but that's such a nebulous nothing limit that people get shot for reaching for their license, having their phone in their hand, you're running away with no weapon, not being able to follow conflicting commands, like anything. And cops are almost never charged, because every court is going to believe he could "reasonably believe" he was threatened. Fuck, if you give me enough time, I can make any situation seem juuuuust plausibly threatening enough to pass that bar. It's insane.
A cop can just rob you. Like tell you to give him your wallet, take all the cash out, and just walk away with it. Exactly like you would imagine getting robbed in an alley would go, except no one can help. And he doesn't even have to hide it, he just drops it in a box at the station and they put it in their bank account. It's legal. You can't prove it wasn't drug money. I can't prove any money wasn't at some point drug money. It's insane.
If a cop just walks in your front door and says "I'm here to kill you and your entire family" YOU ARE GOING TO PRISON IF YOU STOP HIM. There is no positive defense for assaulting a police officer in the United States, and doubly so if you kill him. You have effectively no defense against a homicidal cop, which happens same as any other job. Unless for some reason you have cameras all thru your house and clearly caught the audio of him saying that he's there just to kill you, you have zero chance of not going to prison, probably for life. And that's assuming you aren't killed "resisting arrest" while being taken into custody. It is a crime, in this country, for you to defend yourself under any circumstances if the person you're defending yourself from is a cop. That's insane.
You don't have civil rights if a cop says so. You have the right to have a gun, right? A lot of states have open carry. A cop can shoot you if he sees you have a gun. Doesn't matter if you have a license and everything. So you effectively don't have the right to bear arms if a cop can shoot you for exercising it. You have the right to protest. Unless a cop tells you to stop. He doesn't need a real reason to tell you to stop. And if you don't stop, you can be arrested or shot. So you don't really have the right to protest, do you? A cop cant just search your car or house, right? Unless he claims he heard something, or smelled something, neither of which can be proven. So a cop can search whatever he wants, as long as he pretends there was a "reason". So you dont have protection from unreasonable search and seizure, do you? These are no longer rights- they're things the cops allow.. for now. But legally, those rights have already been found to not actually be rights, because any random cop can decide to take that right from you, for any reason. It's insane.
These aren't like crazy things that I'm just making up, these aren't some weird twisted way I'm looking at something, these are all very real things that we all just.. ignore? Police abolitionists and the media bring these things up all the time, and the overwhelming response to it is: so what? Don't break the law and it won't matter. Blue lives matter. More police funding. Cops should have tanks. It's insane. And I always feel like im just rambling and sound insane when I say this kind of stuff because if you wrote a book and had the dystopian government doing the stuff that the police in this country do every single day, those same people who "back the blue" would line up to say stuff like "*Books government* wouldnt have a chance before us real americans stopped them" on twitter and not even get a hint of the irony.
39K notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 4 months
Text
biden placing sanctions on four (4) west bank settlers to placate pro-palestine americans instead of calling for a ceasefire
 bitch every single one of the 700k+ west bank settlers is violating international law
3K notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Read the entire thread here
Edit: transcribed version of this post can be found here
17K notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
11K notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 7 months
Text
two palestinians from the west bank have died of torture within israeli custody. the number of palestinian prisoners in israeli prison, who are on administrative detention (which means they have not been charged with anything) in june 2023 was 1117, of which 18 were children. the number being held awaiting sentencing was 1158, of which 85 are children.
the number of overall prisoners in israeli prisons in june 2023 was 5,200 most of whom were held on political charges including just being in israel illegally. many are held on false grounds, in inhumane conditions, including minors. they are political prisoners—hostages. since october 7th, that number has doubled to 10,000. so far israel has notified that it has murdered two in its custody. in the west bank (which is not ruled by hamas) over 90 palestinians have been extra-judicially murdered by settlers and the IDF since october 7th.
israel also has a policy of withholding corpses of palestinians who die in its custody. it's called "post-mortem detention." israel says it only has this policy for hamas fighters, but it is not true. there are currently at least 80 corpses of palestinians withheld from families, and around 370 who were either buried in undisclosed locations or kept in the morgue. when they are released, families are given 30 minutes to bury their loved ones in the dead of night, supervised by israeli soldiers with a limited amount of family members in attendance.
10K notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 8 months
Text
And people keep trying to justify Israel's existence on the basis that it is somehow a safe place for the preservation of Jewish people and their culture and not only is that an awful argument for establishing a Settler Colonist Apartheid State but it's not even true. Like the state is politically and economically dominated by Ashkenazi Jews from Northern Europe and their descendants. While not as severely mistreated as Palestinians, there is still a significant disparity between the European and Non-European Jews in terms of income and education. Non-European Jews are still regularly subject to interpersonal bigotry (hell earlier this year there was a news story about a viral video where Ashkenazi girls in a Purim made a skit mocking the Mizrahi) and Israel government policies towards non-Ashkenazi migrants have done severe damage to their social structure and cultural traditions. Not to mention the fact that the whole reason why many Mizrahi migrated in the first place was to escape the violence caused by European Jews committing atrocities in their name, tearing communities apart as neighbours that had peacefully co-existed for centuries found themselves on opposite sides of this new ethno-religious conflict
There have even been attempts in Israeli history at the forceful assimilation or even biological reduction of non-European Jews; the kidnapping and adoption of Yemeni Jewish children in the 1950s is significant example of the former while the forced contraception of Beta Israeli (Ethiopean Jewish migrants) with the explicit intention of reducing their population's birth rate is an example of the latter. There's also very clear favouritism when it comes to recent converts; white Afrikaner converts are given the right of Aliyah while Nigerian Igbos are not. Like the fact of the matter is that Israel's fundamental nature is as a European Settler Colony, incredibly racist not only towards the indigenous Palestinians but the many Non-European Jews it claims to represent. It's an outpost of Western Imperialism, not a haven for the Jewish people. If it was ever meant to be the latter than it has failed miserably
6K notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 8 months
Text
People do not realize that when we say Israel is a settler-colonial state, we mean it was literally devised in junction with European imperialism around the turn of the century.
Political Zionism was founded by Theodore Herzl. Originally, Zionists were not specifically interested in the land of Palestine as a colonial project. In fact, Herzl was debating making Argentina the focus of mass Zionist migration, which is quite ironic considering Argentina's colonial and Aryanist past. British-controlled Uganda was also offered as a possibility by Joseph Chamberlain, a Conservative imperialist.
To encourage mass Jewish migration to Palestine, he worked with the British, who had recently drove the Ottoman Empire out of the Levant, and now boasted political dominance in the region, thanks to the Sykes–Picot Agreement between the UK, France, Italy, and Russia which covertly authorized British influence in Palestine, which had become a target of colonial expansion. He specifically wished to collaborate with Cecil Rhodes, a British imperialist who played a lead role in colonizing Zimbabwe and Zambia, and later took inspiration from his time spent extracting wealth from Africa as the founder of mining conglomerate the British South Africa Company.
Herzl’s personal goals for Zionism were colonial. He said in a letter to Rhodes:
“You are being invited to help make history. It doesn’t involve Africa, but a piece of Asia Minor; not Englishmen but Jews [
] How, then, do I happen to turn to you since this is an out-of-the-way matter for you? How indeed? Because it is something colonial [
] I [
] have examined this plan and found it correct and practicable. It is a plan full of culture, excellent for the group of people for whom it is directly designed, and quite good for England, for Greater Britain [...]”
At that time, Palestine was predominately populated with Arab Muslims and Christians, as well as Arab Jews (Old Yishuv) and Druze. Jews made up around 6% of the population. The Ottoman government specifically released a manifesto at the start of Zionist migration condemning the colonization, stating:
“[Jews] among us [
] who have been living in our province since before the war; they are as we are, and their loyalties are our own.”
The Balfour Declaration of 1917 on behalf of parliament, officially established the British Mandate of Palestine, sowing the seeds for the modern state of Israel, by means of the UK's ongoing occupation of the region.
Zionism was never about promoting Jewish culture or safety; it has always been tied up in Western (settler-)colonial expansion. !من Ű§Ù„Ù†Ù‡Ű± Ű„Ù„Ù‰ Ű§Ù„ŰšŰ­Ű±
13K notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
79K notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
Ffs... SO "fun" story from Al-Khalil. Families attend the funeral of Shireen Abu Akleh in Jerusalem.
Meanwhile, in Al-Khalil, a bunch settlers have arrived and started looting the home of a Palestinian family and taken the building for their own, and they're calling this "Building Aquisition".
The family was at a f*cking funeral and their home is now stolen.
This is what it's like being a Palestinian in Palestine. There are PLENTY of similar stories of people visiting their families or going shopping and returning to their homes either empty of valuables or outright claimed by settlers.
1K notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 2 years
Text
God seeing y’all’s take away being “This is why we need to vote” and not “why the fuck didn’t the democrats codify any of their gains in the last 50 years” is really disheartening. Do you really not see the fact that our civil rights have been deliberately kept as a bargaining chip on the table so the democrats never actually had to do anything while elected? How is it not blatantly obvious to y’all that this is the system working as intended, that the democrats are collaborators to the republicans and not genuine opposition? This mess us where “vote blue no matter who” gets you, because you’ve all voted for the most conservative members of the blue team, you’ve outright says your only standard is “not a Republican” which means the officials who are practically republicans but registers as democrats have been able to retain power for decades, shifting the democrat party to the right. You guys cheered on people like the Biden’s, the Clinton’s, Pelosi, blue dog democrats, democrat war hawks, etc and you’re surprised the party is functionally just republicans with different lobbyists.
When the full effect of your politics is a sticker slogan in your laptop and voting a few times every few years, don’t be surprised at the frustration that nothing is changing for the better. You’ve opted in to having no power, it shouldn’t shock you that they don’t care.
23 notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 2 years
Text
The only humane way to reduce abortion is to reduce the number of unsafe and unwanted pregnancies.
Some abortions will always be necessary healthcare, even in a utopia where there was no rape, no incest, no domestic violence, no poverty, mandatory comprehensive sex ed before puberty, free birth control and contraceptives, and an excellent standard of medical care for all pregnant people with new research into how to prevent dangerous pregnancies.
Abortions are morally neutral medical procedures and no one particular group's religious proclivities should dictate public health policy.
Doctors and patients should get to decide what healthcare is necessary for the patient together without the interference of politicians, insurance companies, or other people's religious feelings.
Abortion should be publicly funded along with all other healthcare, readily available, and done with real, scientifically fact-based informed consent.
If you disagree with any of the above, please kindly eat glass and stay the fuck away from me.
82 notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 2 years
Text
post-shoah, there was this weird rebranding of jewish ppl as being the exact same as the gentiles around them except with a different religion. which is just... not even remotely accurate
but it explains how modern mainstream american attitudes towards jewish ppl exist:
if the jews who fled to eretz yisrael post-shoah are ethnically germans and poles and austrians that just practice the religion of judaism, then of course they are white european colonizers even if they are refugees. but the jews who feld to eretz yisrael post-shoah WEREN'T ethnically european. because judaism is a mainly-diasporic ethnoreligion. in order to be diasporic you have to be removed from some homeland; that homeland for the jewish people is the area around jerusalem. not europe.
if jews are just white europeans with a different religion, then they are part of white supremacy and therefore aren't marginalized. but jewish people are actually the primary target of nazi-brand white supremacy and a secondary target of kkk-brand white supremacy, but ultimately are that the core of nearly all white supremacist beliefs and conspiracy theories. jewish people are incredibly marginalized, generally speaking, and deserve allies and protections.
if we're all white europeans with abrahamic religions, and if we share the old testament, then surely judaism is "just xtianity without jesus." but judaism isn't xtianity without jesus. judaism is its own individual religion. our tanakh is not the same as your old testament. we have also spent thousands of years interpreting and re-interpreting our religious texts, further increasing the distance between xtianity and modern judaism. also, judaism is a religion of praxis whereas xtianity is a religion of orthodoxy, which means that the fundamental way our religions operate is different. you cannot treat judaism as xtianity without jesus. you cannot lump judaism together with xtianity as "judeo-xtian" or "abrahamic," in most cases those labels aren't accurate and just serve to mean xtian.
if jews are just europeans with a different religion, then hashoah was a white-on-white genocide and is "european problems." jewish people also cannot be victims of white supremacy today (similar to above). jewish people have been seen as middle eastern outsiders in europe for thousands of years. hitler's hatred of jews was specifically racial, not religious, and converting would not spare a jew from hitler's final solution. white supremacists then and today view jews as "white interlopers," non-white sub-human beings posing as white people to infiltrate the white race and degrade it with our inferior genetics and nefarious plans for world domination. if that sounds ridiculous, it is, but that is genuinely their belief. light-skinned jews do enjoy white privilege the majority of the time in the modern west, but that privilege is often conditional on a)if the other white person knows they are jewish and b)if the other white person considers jewish people to be white or not.
there are so many more examples but i think my point is clear. this is what forced assimilation looks like, and this is the harm it causes to the group being assimilated. the fact that our reality is considered a lie and lies are peddled as reality is actively harmful. this assimilation is not proof of improvements in antisemitism but proof that antisemitism is systemic. erasure is not and never will be good.
135 notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 2 years
Text
Hope you guys also realize that 90% of the time when you see one of those “Russian state-affiliated media” stickers on Twitter or Instagram it means that outlet maybe got some money from RT one time or they host their podcast and Russia has precisely zero editorial control over their content lol
3K notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 2 years
Text
so i'm seeing this post go around quite a bit uncritically with links to straight up donate to ukrainian neo-nazi groups so i'll break it down, here's the post you'll probably see:
Tumblr media
here's the contents of one link, calling themselves "freikorps" and using what looks to be an azov battalion insignia as an avatar:
Tumblr media
and here's what the azov battalion is if you don't know:
now here's another link this time with with a pic of ppl flying a right sector flag:
Tumblr media
if you dont know what right sector is:
so please don't donate to this shit, the situation isn't just some simple little good guy vs big bad guy thing, if you see someone sharing that post, try sharing this with them bcus they probably don't know
36K notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 2 years
Link
does that person know how many years america and its allies have been bombing somalia
4K notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
7K notes · View notes
nerdiepolitics · 2 years
Text
“Karl Marx is most famous as a critic of capitalism, but at the heart of his critique can be found a desperate plea for the transformation of work. People, he argues, express themselves and create the world through creative and collective activity. This natural tendency is twisted into something unrecognisable in work under capitalism. He didn’t just think work around him was bad because it took place in noisy and dangerous conditions, or for low wages and long hours. The problem of work was a fundamental one: under capitalism, work takes something human and turns it into something monstrous. The forces of capital become ravenous, eating up all that is human, sucking on the very lifeblood of society.”
— Amelia Horgan, Lost in Work: Escaping Capitalism (via probablyasocialecologist)
18K notes · View notes