Tumgik
#((it is a non zero percent chance that i actually get back on this blog........))
cosmcther · 4 months
Note
space mom please come home
Tumblr media
     "Awh... keep talking like that and you're going to have me feeling guilty. But canonically, I'm really only supposed to be here for one month out of every century, so... take my extended absence as a correcting of the timeline as it were."
4 notes · View notes
terraliensvent · 3 months
Note
multiple ppl close to kinah were able to verify that they were in the hospital recovering when the attempt happened. all of those ppl could not collab and lie so one person could get “extra attention” in ur words. Im frustrated with terra staff aswell but that doesn’t mean its ok now to call someones suicide attempt fake so ur feelings seem more valid. I find that extremely sickening. U have zero evidence or good reason for doubt or else u would have vented about it already. all u have is ur feefees. u do need therapy. And mod pls stop validating baseless speculation on smth so serious. what happened 2 people needing proof for claims like this
alright yeah im deleting kinah asks now
first off i dont think that people should just believe whatever they read on the internet, because you dont know who these people are irl. again, thats not to say that you shouldnt give support where you can or that you should make public callouts saying that it was all fake when you dont know for sure, BUT at the same time theres a level of speculation regardless because its the fucking internet. people are wild, people are strangers, and there is a non zero chance that people could have lied. just because people have a level of speculation on something they read online, that doesnt mean they need therapy and it doesnt mean theyre a bad person, it means they have a brain. if YOU want to believe it without a shadow of a doubt then thats fine, and if other people have some doubt thats also fine, just dont go out of your way to fucking bother people because thats just unnecessary.
second off, i need proof for accusations like “so and so is posting feral” or “so and so is an abuser,” saying things like “the way that kinah bounced back into cs makes me speculate” isnt an accusation.
the views of the anons i post here arent reflective of my own views, and if something is a problem i give my own input on it in my response. when i created this blog i didnt want to delete asks because i feel like that controls a narrative and makes me an unreliable narrator when it comes to these discussions. if people want to talk about things like this, i didnt want to force silence because thats not how you hold a discussion.
as an additional note: anons have been becoming increasingly aggressive in my inbox, whether its towards one another or towards myself. i implore all of you to stop being so aggressive, stop making assumptions, and stop playing this holier than thou card. so much of the art and cs community is made up of people who will virtue signal and place themselves on a moral pedestal and my inbox is the last place for that. if you want to rant and complain, go ahead, but stop acting like youre better than each other because you have the Correct Opinion on everything and believe everything you read on the internet.
my final thoughts on this are as follows: there is a non zero chance that everyone is lying. is it a small chance? sure. does this mean we should spread the narrative that it was all fake? no. are you a horrible person who should die in a fire because you dont 100 percent believe that the attempts were real? no, but also dont go out of your way to be an asshole because of that belief. i think we should all publicly operate under the assumption that the attempts were real. if you want to privately speculate, go fucking wild. could kinah going back into cs and making stuff for terras possibly be bad for their mental health? maybe. but also, its none of our business. and thats what im ending this topic with, a lot of this shit really is just none of our business and i think you all give way too much of a fuck about someone who you will never know irl.
i dont dislike kinah, in fact i actually really liked them when they were on staff for terras. but at some point we all gotta throw our arms up and say why is this taking up so much of my brain power when this person is just someone i follow on fucking toyhouse.
we are done with asks about kinahs attempt now, unless anyone has important info or something new to say im deleting them.
4 notes · View notes
canyouhearthelight · 3 years
Text
The Miys, Ch. 144
After much demand, Kink Night at the Undine has arrived. This chapter is really fun, was informative to write, but if you need to skip it, you won’t miss out on the overall story. So, trigger warnings on this chapter for:
- Bondage (mentions of)
- Pegging (possible mention of?)
- Impact play (discussed, both done wrongly and demonstrated correctly)
- Topping and bottoming
To be clear: These are all mentioned from the perspective of a non-participant, non-voyeur. I would probably overall rate this chapter appropriate for 14 years and older, but your mileage may vary. However, kink in general can be very healthy if done correctly, and this chapter was double beta-read, not only by @baelpenrose but also by @charlylimph-blog for accuracy of the scene.  This actually prevented a PROFOUND mistake from making it to queueing, so I am super grateful for their help.
Once I was released from medical after an unnecessarily long lecture from Noah, I found I had a message waiting from Charly with a date and time to meet at the Undine.  Right below that was a message from Sebastian with a uniform-slash-dresscode of sorts.
Aw nuggets. I had forgotten what night it was. 
There wasn’t time to grab clothes from my quarters, but my office was on the way to the bar, so I stopped by to change.  Socks and shoes were a bit of a challenge, since I generally didn’t wear either, so I had to find a vendor to help me fill in the gaps.  Granted, shoes weren’t specified in Sebastian’s list.  However, there was exactly a zero percent chance that I was going to lend a hand at a kink party while barefoot. Just… no. Nope. Not happening.
I wiped my palms nervously against my slacks when I arrived, not sure exactly what to expect.  Charly and I had talked about it, but none of that knowledge wanted to make its presence known at the moment, apparently.  Instead, my mind kept drifting to what in the actual hell she had roped Arthur into doing.  The door opened entirely too soon to reveal a smiling Charly, who grabbed my arm and dragged me behind her to the small group already gathered.
All of my nerves were forced from my body by the sputtering laughter I fell victim to when I saw Arthur - I still had no idea what he would be doing, but he looked like someone took a post-apocalyptic movie hero and hit a button labelled ‘make him a villain’ a few too many times.  The leather jacket and motorcycle pants were fairly innocuous, since I knew he actually owned both and neither were terribly uncommon on the Ark.  Same thing held for the boots - they were just practical in the After and several people held on to that preference with a death grip.
“Cloak’s a nice touch,” I snorted, trying desperately to ignore the campier bits of his outfit.
I was dangerously close to losing it when he scowled and adjusted the laurel crown - I mean, really? - resting on his head. “I knew I shouldn’t have cut my hair this morning,” he muttered. “Damned thing won’t sit right anymore.”
Charly clapped her hands to get everyone’s attention. “Okay, one more run through of what everyone will be doing!”
Sebastian nodded seriously and flicked a towel over his shoulder before handing me an apron. “Sophia has kindly agreed to prep the snacks, while I serve and clean behind people. She’ll clear any dishes in between batches, and one or the other of us will do a lap of the floor every fifteen minutes to ensure everyone is hydrated and there’s no need for medical attention.” He winked at the relief on my face.
Cooking, clearing plates, and momming people into staying hydrated. I could do that.
Arthur brushed off his pauldrons, only forcing me to confront the fact that they were shaped like skulls again, before straightening with aplomb. “I will be Dungeon Master, keeping an eye on everything from there,” he pointed to a scaffold that had been put into place over the bartop, “And intervening as needed if things get out of hand.” Without so much as a twitch of question from me, he explained. “Charly and Coffey can’t be everywhere at once, so I get to perch on high, look ridiculous, and play bouncer if Coffey can’t get there first.”
“Yep,” Charly nodded seriously. For all that she normally seemed built out of chaos and energy, this was Boss Lady Charly. “Let’s keep it safe, sane, and consensual across the board. Speaking of!” She pulled two badges from seemingly nowhere. “Soph, Bash, these are for you.” I took one and immediately grinned when I read it. Staff Only - I Do Not Consent. “If either of you want to play, go for it, but otherwise, probably wear those.  Sexy librarian and millionaire CEO are tropes that exist, so ya know - no confusion for anyone.  Any questions, concerns, cries for help?” When we all shook our heads, she clapped again. “Okay, off you go! Thanks everyone.”
Sebastian tilted his head toward the kitchen and I followed, wiping my hands on my legs again. “Thank you for agreeing to help with snacks.  I know Charly already told you, but I am not the greatest at finger foods that don’t make a mess or won’t be too heavy.”
I hummed for a second before making a few suggestions. “Macaroni and cheese bites, they’re about this big.” I made a circle about an inch and a half across with my fingers. “Just pop and go. Pigs in blankets, the kind with cocktail sausages… meatballs, but probably with lamb instead of beef.  Dumplings.” I shrugged. “Charly swears people actually bring food to these, so once that stuff starts coming in, it would just be portioning it and sending it back out.  We shouldn’t have too much actual cooking to do.”
He nodded and started grabbing ingredients. “So that leaves drinks, plates, and utensils.” When I reached for a rack of glasses, he stopped me. “No.  If one of us drops anything that can break, people can get injured.  I’ve been stocking up on fiber-based plates, forks, and spoons.  Drinks are going to be in those corn-starch gel pouches.”
“Dude,” I groaned. “Those things get so gummy.”
“Straws are real and do exist.”
“Besides, I can already tell someone is going to find alternative uses for those,” Arthur called from behind us. I swear, I could hear him smirking. “You can’t put humans, sex, and flavored liquid in the same room and not expect that.”
I shook my head with a smile, but he had a point. Once we shooed him away, work on the snacks went pretty quick.  Judging by the sounds coming from the main room, it was a good thing, too - furniture being dragged, then Arthur’s voice ringing out to welcome everyone.  Soon, Sebastian was swinging out of the kitchen door with the first trays, and true to Charly’s word, he came back carrying a plate of neatly stacked fudge, followed by Arthur carrying a covered container.
“Scratch the meatballs, someone brought an actual mountain of sausage balls,” Arthur grunted as he slammed the container on a flat surface before retreating.
“Not even a joke?” I mused.
“Must be slipping,” Sebastian grinned. “I mean, he said ‘balls’ twice…”
“Low hanging fruit!” a voice called from the main room.  It must have seemed entirely out of context to the crowd, but Sebastian and I were laughing as we started plating so he could carry more food out to the spots Charly had designated.
A timer went off, so I took the mac and cheese bites out of the oven, snagged a tray of drink-blobs, shoved a fistful of straws into my apron and took off to do my lap of the event.  There were already people taking a break, reaching gratefully for hydration.  Several times, someone would reach for one and pour it in a partner’s  mouth, and on one occasion, a woman offered it up like a gift to a bound man, both biting into it and drinking greedily.
I almost stepped on someone before I realized there was an actual pile of people on the floor. I diverted my eyes quickly from what I thought was an all-out orgy before my brain registered that I wasn’t hearing sex noises - just whispers.  Snapping my eyes back up, it took a moment to figure out that I had nearly stepped on the largest cuddle pile I had seen since my apartment on Insert Winter Holiday.  Crouching, I balanced what was left of the drink blobs on one hand while holding out the straws with another.  In no time at all, the tray was empty and I was heading back for more.
This time, food on one hand, drinks on the other, I exited the kitchen to see Charly wrapping up her rope-bondage safety lecture before starting to demonstrate different knots on a volunteer, with Charly in the role of the top for this scenario. Watching her calmly contort and restrain another human being while calmly explaining the psychology behind it was… kind of terrifying.  I had to constantly remind myself that this person volunteered and that Charly was experienced on both ends of the rope.  
One more sweep of the room landed me with only a dozen or so drinks left on top of a pile of empty trays.  I backed into the kitchen to sanitize and re-load the trays, only to hear Sebastian swearing. “Who the hell brought chili!?”
“Apparently someone thought it was a good idea,” I shrugged, baffled. I mean, it didn’t seem like a good idea to me, but this wasn’t exactly my area of expertise.  “Maybe we put it in bowls, set up a little station in one of the break areas, with toppings? Let people help themselves?”
“Bondage potlucks and chili…” He shook his head. “Trying to remind myself that I’ve seen weirder things, but…”
“I can promise you, they are having fun. And they’re hydrated!” I shook my mostly empty platter of blobs at him.
Sebastian went out to retrieve more food from the people who brought it, and I kept rolling sausages in dough.  “More fudge!” he crowed. “I snagged a piece of the first batch, and it was amazing.”
“You clearly do not see the irony,” I muttered where he couldn’t hear me. “Oh, heavens, no chili! But fudge… fudge is fine…”
The next time I was able to break free and take my designated lap, a slight bit more chaos had descended as everyone had gotten more comfortable.  Several of the more experienced were examining and complimenting each other on their knots and arrangements of their subs. Ivan and Jokul were doing…. Something… that involved Ivan in a gorgeous evening gown and Jokul with a gag in his mouth.  I was almost done with my circuit when a thud reverberated behind me and a black cloak whipped by.
“For the love of…” Arthur growled. I thought he was going to dribble the cowering man he was glaring at like a basketball, but instead he brandished a marker and made two quick X’s on a bare pair of buttocks. “Here and here. Only here and here.” With an irritated flourish, he wrote NOT HERE across the small of the attached back. “This will give someone kidney damage.  Specifically you if I catch you doing it again.” Ducking around to the face of the person he had just used as a whiteboard, he shook his finger. “And I’m not even going to apologize, because you have a safeword and you need to use it. First, last, and only warning, you two. If that hit had been any more than a nervous first tap, you wouldn’t even be getting that.”  Without a word, he snagged the cane sitting on the table nearby and took it with him. “They aren’t getting anywhere near the cane, fucking idiots. Gotta talk to Charly about those two…” he muttered as he blew back past me, so angry he didn’t even acknowledge that I was standing there.
I almost dropped the stack of empty platters when the Imperial March started playing while Arthur stomped back into his position over the bar. “Attention, Deviants!  Courtesy of some poor practices I’ve seen, I would like to invite Sir Coffey and his pet fae Charly to give us a tutorial on safe and proper impact play!”  Applause started as he beckoned them forward, Sebastian theatrically adjusting the lights to center in front of the stage.
I ducked back into the kitchen as Coffey’s voice rang out over the crowd, explaining yet again safewords and consent before launching into what toys were used how and where.  A little public humiliation never hurt anyone, I joked with myself. At least not for some of the people out there.
<< Prev  Masterlist  Next >>
53 notes · View notes
johnboothus · 3 years
Text
Willett Pot Still: The Liquid #BourbonTok Loves to Hate
Tumblr media
For more stories on TikTok, check out our whole series here.
“What’s up Bourbon TikTok? … Today I want to tell you about my least favorite bottle in my collection,” says Chad Watson, a Lexington, Ky.-based bourbon enthusiast who goes by @mydailybourbon. Wearing a black tie with a zippered gray jacket, over the next 40 seconds Watson discusses how much he dislikes Willett Pot Still Reserve — “too malty, too earthy, too grassy” — which has become the bourbon that TikTokers most love to hate.
Spend any amount of time on so-called Bourbon TikTok and you can’t help but run across hundreds of reviews for Willett Pot Still Reserve. Some are professional, most are amateur, a few are earnest, many more are comical, bordering on cruel. And they’re nearly all negative, as though slamming this particular whiskey is a rite of passage in becoming a bourbon reviewer on the exceedingly popular platform.
So how did Willett Pot Still Reserve become the most dunked-on bourbon in all of TikTok?
“TikTokers are doing a service that others in the blogging, YouTube, Instagram, and even the podcast space can’t,” believes Kenny Coleman, host of the Bourbon Pursuit podcast. He says that once something like these Willett Pot Still slams take off via TikTok’s algorithm, more are certain to follow. “So now bourbon reviewers on TikTok are getting a message out to people who didn’t necessarily know there even are bourbon reviews,” he says.
@whiskeydizz
Honest and Unbiased Review #willett #potstill #bourbon #fyp #bourbontiktok #whiskey
♬ Blade Runner 2049 – Synthwave Goose
Zero Point Zero
For connoisseurs, Willett holds a hallowed position in the American whiskey pantheon. The company humbly began in 1984 when Even Kulsveen purchased it from his father-in-law, Thompson Willett, and renamed it Kentucky Bourbon Distillers. But Kulsveen wasn’t actually distilling anything, instead sourcing unwanted stock from nearby distilleries like Bernheim, Four Roses, Heaven Hill, Jim Beam, and the vaunted Stitzel-Weller.
As the modern American whiskey boom began to take shape in the early aughts, Kulsveen’s son Drew began releasing their most primo stock as cask-strength, non-chill-filtered single barrels under the umbrella Willett Family Estate. Some of these, with names like Red Hook Rye, Doug’s Green Ink, and Rathskeller Rye, became some of the most acclaimed releases in American whiskey history. Pretty much all Willett Family Estate bottlings released since 2006 now sell for hundreds if not thousands of dollars — and, if you lack knowledge and connections, you really have no chance to ever score any.
“Purple tops, green tops, that’s fun stuff, but when it comes to [Pot Still] … it’s just not for me,” says Watson.
Unfortunately, almost all Willett looks identical — Cognac-style bottles topped with, as Watson mentions, purple foil tops, green foil tops, or white wax. All are slapped with stark white labels featuring the Willett family crest, with the only identifying differences being tiny, handwritten details indicating each bottle’s age, proof, and sometimes an esoteric barrel number. (For a while, the whiskey internet circulated a Google spreadsheet to keep track of these barrel numbers.) All this is what makes the Willett portfolio, if you will, completely inscrutable to newcomers.
“Willett is a very notable brand and people love to chase their limited releases,” says Watson. “So Willett does what most brands would do in that case: creates a product that draws people with their eyes, is priced decently, and is pretty much always available.”
That product, of course, being Willett Pot Still Reserve, the only Willett whiskey ever released into the mainstream. And that’s where I suspect the cognitive dissonance sets in.
Newcomers to the bourbon hobby see the reverent tones Willett is spoken with online, then assume that all Willett is the great Willett that whiskey geeks have been stockpiling for years. The fact that Willett Pot Still Reserve comes in an eye-catching glass decanter — meant to look like a literal copper pot still — solidifies the fact they’ve stumbled upon a good score, which makes the ensuing disappointment once they finally taste it all the worse.
“What’s up guys and gals, this is Kent Davis, wanting to give you an honest bourbon review,” says @kentedavis33, speaking over a still image of the Pot Still bottle. His following nine-second TikTok is a succinct slam:
“Nice bottle, but zero point zero.”
@mattybourbon
Willett Pot Still Reserve Review#bourbon #bourbonreview #whiskey #whiskeyreview
♬ original sound – MATTYBOURBON
Nicest Looking Bottle in My Collection
That “nice” bottle is exactly what leads to so much animus, claims Watson.
“Once people try the juice inside, they realize they have been duped,” says Watson. “For what seems like an amazing art piece, the liquid inside just doesn’t match the standard. It tastes young, earthy, and very green.”
Almost all Pot Still appearances on TikTok begin with the reviewer mentioning how much they like the bottle. In his review, Watson notes that the “bottle shape … is really cool.” “Pretty neat bottle…” says @glennflashwells. “Nicest looking bottle in my collection hands down,” says @mattybourbon. In many cases that will be the last wholly positive thing uttered by the reviewer.
Florida-based Andy Mauldin (@ronbourbondy) chose Willett Pot Still for his first-ever TikTok review earlier this year, claiming he’s never tried it before. Though even that doesn’t stop him from comically coughing after his first sip.
“Whahoooooaa, that is hot!” he exclaims as he struggles to clear his throat. He eventually calls Willett Pot Still Reserve “trash,” noting that the bottle is its “only redeeming quality.” Josh Grundemann (@bassinandbourbon) also coughs, nearly choking after sipping his first-ever Pot Still pour.
“That might be the worst bourbon I’ve ever tasted,” states the Louisiana man.
@bassinandbourbon
Is Willet Pot Still worth it? @60secondbourbonreview and @caseywarr do! Here’s my thoughts! #BourbonTikTok #Bourbon #fyp
♬ original sound – Josh Grundmann
In a way, you could say a TikToker’s first sip of Willett Pot Still is the baptism by firewater that catapults them to the next level of connoisseurship. Maybe they’ll now be ready to get more serious with their bourbon reviewing. Or, maybe they’ll just want to milk the “Pot Still sucks” joke even further — by now it’s started to become a sort of TikTok meme.
Maudlin, for his part, did a follow-up TikTok where he dumps his remaining Pot Still into a fancy crystal decanter, jokingly hoping his wife will now assume it’s the “good stuff,” and thus drink it after running out of her preferred rosé.
If many Pot Still bashers go for the laughs regarding how awful it is compared to the luxe accommodations of the bottle it is housed in, there are a scant few TikTokers who are more earnest in their reviews. Steve Higdon (@60secondbourbonreview) finds Pot Still “pretty mellow” and “easy to drink.” Casey Warr thinks it’s “okay stuff.” While @mattybourbon calls it “not a great bourbon,” though admits it has a nice nose with notes of buttered popcorn, scoring it a decent 5 out of 10.
Those reviews might not elicit laughs or a viral view count, but they’re more accurate in their assessments. Pot Still Reserve is certainly not good — and I would never keep a bottle of it in my house — but it’s not as bad as TikTok would have you believe. Distiller rates it an 88 (out of 100), while Drink Hacker scores it a B+. That feels about right to me. Rumors abound that the spirit has gotten worse over the years, changing from a rye-flavored single-barrel bourbon to a wheated “small batch” blend of undisclosed origins. Whatever the case, it is almost certainly not 100 percent distilled via pot still, which makes the name and bottle design even more amusing.
That’s why the online anger continues to flow, with neophytes thinking they scored the world-famous Willett, seeing the fancy bottle suitable for displaying on the back bar, resting their iPhones facing them in selfie mode, firing up TikTok, taking a big sip, and then realizing (on video) that they just threw 50 bucks down the drain.
And, comical though these may be, maybe Willett should start paying more attention to them.
“Whiskey appeals differently to everyone. So there will be camps that like or dislike a certain whiskey,” says Coleman. “But when a majority of people are consistently giving the same message, the brand should take note and adjust.”
Or maybe not, as there continues to be a seemingly endless stream of fresh-faced TikTokers very excited about their recent Pot Still scores. Like @whiskeymorning, who enters his house clutching two bottles of Pot Still by their necks as he dances to Saweetie’s “My Time.”
We’ll wait for his TikTok review once he finally cracks it. My guess is that it will almost certainly involve coughing.
The article Willett Pot Still: The Liquid #BourbonTok Loves to Hate appeared first on VinePair.
Via https://vinepair.com/articles/86ed-proof-willett-pot-still/
source https://vinology1.weebly.com/blog/willett-pot-still-the-liquid-bourbontok-loves-to-hate
0 notes
theblackroseofsatan · 5 years
Text
Developing a Mobile App is a difficult process, but the end product is fulfilling.
Tumblr media
The way toward making a mobile app isn't constrained to coding. It includes numerous stages, including thought portrayal and explanation, correspondence with a product advancement organization, cost estimation, prototyping, structure, back-end and mobile improvement, discharge and showcasing. 
Truly, it's perplexing – yet the game is positively worth the flame! 
As indicated by GeoMobile, clients go through three hours, 23 minutes per day in apps (contrasted with 50 minutes on mobile web and barely two hours spent on PCs). Regardless of whether you intend to convey a definitive encounter to your mobile clients or assemble an app-based business, you're in good shape.  
The Mobile App Development Process: 3 Steps to Success 
1. Thought depiction and necessities investigation 
Contact a product improvement organization and give a general portrayal of your application. For instance, "I need a sustenance requesting app, as Domino's, with the café menu showed on the home screen." 
The product improvement organization will at that point set up a ballpark cost gauge utilizing the app you alluded to as a kind of perspective. The expense of structure an eatery app relies upon different variables. These incorporate the nation you re-appropriate the advancement work to, the size of an improvement organization, stage decision, the estimating model, the extent of work, and so forth. No product improvement organization will give you a precise gauge dependent on your general depiction – and that is the place the prerequisites elicitation procedure starts. Be prepared to meet your Account Manager and tech lead face to face/on Skype to settle on your app's list of capabilities – that is, the rundown of highlights that will enable your clients to pick a supper, put in a request and make a protected installment. 
Together with the seller, you'll pick the objective stage. Guideline speaking, it's Android and iOS, so you'll need to fabricate two local apps to guarantee consistent experience on numerous gadgets. Additionally, you have to settle on an estimating model. Building a sustenance requesting app isn't advanced science, so you'll most likely sign a Fixed Price (FP) contract and have the option to design programming improvement costs ahead of time. Contingent upon the unpredictability of your task, the correspondence part may take as long as a little while. At last, in any case, you'll have a nitty gritty specialized vision posting all the practical (what your app ought to do) and non-utilitarian (how the app will do it) necessities for your venture. 
In case you're going to adopt the Fixed Price strategy, ensure the tech vision covers every one of the highlights you'd like to empower in your application. On the off chance that you understand you need to add additional highlights to the extension amidst the improvement procedure, you'll need to consent to a beneficial arrangement and pay for those highlights independently. As per your FP contract, you won't almost certainly survey your collaboration until the part of the arrangement procedure. 
As another choice, you can sign a Time and Material (T&M) contract and be more involved with the undertaking – that is, organize the app includes on the degree, survey the work toward the part of the arrangement (which normally keep going for two to about a month) and direct eye to eye and telephone gatherings with your group. The T&M model is increasingly reasonable for complex and information concentrated mobile app ventures managing bleeding edge advancements like the Internet of Things, man-made reasoning or enlarged reality. Nonetheless, your cost will be more enthusiastically to foresee. 
2. Mobile app plan and advancement 
The (UI) some portion of an app is only a glimpse of something larger. The mobile app rationale is empowered by a server, which is worked with web advancement innovations like PHP, .Net, Ruby, and so on. 
Here the "app rationale" term alludes to numerous things, including live talk (your clients should message call focus workers or conveyance staff legitimately), social highlights (counting the reconciliation with interpersonal organizations, remarks, appraisals, and so on.), referral/client devotion program components (solicitations, extra focuses and limits) and installments. Additionally, you'll need an online administrator support to refresh menu and valuing data, oversee areas, track arranges and characterize conveyance territory. 
An extraordinary mobile app is a lot of modules which can be created and sent autonomously. Returning to the sustenance requesting app model, it will highlight different modules like correspondence, social highlights, installments, conveyance administration and chain the executives. 
How would you realize what highlights will demonstrate helpful to your clients? You can just tell once you attempt, so you likely should begin with a Minimum Viable Product (otherwise known as the extremely essential rendition of your app), lead testing and extend its list of capabilities dependent on client input. At long last, there's the plan part. Your plan choices ought to be founded on a through client inquire about; you may even get more specialized about it and make straightforward app wireframes in Balsamiq before you address a mobile app improvement organization to clarify your thought better. Together with a client experience (UX) creator, you'll make sense of how app screens ought to be associated with one another to enable your clients to place arranges in the most helpful manner and ensure the plan meets the App Store and Google Play prerequisites. 
3. Mobile app promoting Four to five months after the fact your app will be prepared to dispatch – and here comes the hardest part: app promoting. In spite of the fact that apps now expend more than 90 percent of the all out mobile time, most cell phone proprietors utilize only 30 apps all the time. These incorporate Facebook and Instagram, mobile games, instructive apps and business devices. Advertising the app to clients who go to your physical cafés would one say one is thing; imagine a scenario where you're working an online nourishment conveyance business as it were. Clearly, you have to make some buzz around your undertaking before the app goes live. Make certain to distribute an adequate showcasing spending plan (expect around $30K-in addition to) to do the accompanying: 
Think about an app include that will enable you to stand apart from the challenge (something like Domino's Zero Clicks will do). 
Fabricate a basic WordPress promotion site with an explainer video and data about your undertaking. At that point start a Google AdWords battle to get some traffic and urge clients to buy in for updates. 
Run a blog archiving the app making procedure and offer news via web-based networking media. 
Start with a MVP and lead early tests to refine your item. 
Plan a delicate dispatch to test your plan of action. 
Actually quite difficult, correct? With the normal expense per introduce (CPI) in the USA hitting $ 1.64 (iOS) and $ 1.91 (Android) a year ago, showcasing another app on a strict spending plan is a genuine test. Maybe you can draw motivation from Eat24 – a sustenance conveyance organization that chose to promote their administrations on grown-up sites and won enormous.
0 notes
filipeteimuraz · 5 years
Text
Which Content Marketing Strategies Have the Biggest Impact on Keyword Rankings?
The term “content marketing” is a wide umbrella.
It encompasses a plethora of different strategies and techniques.
But at the end of the day, one of your primary goals is to create content that ranks as highly as possible on search engine results pages (SERPs).
This is important because organic traffic is the number one means of generating traffic for many companies.
A study from The Bright Edge even “found that organic search drives 51 percent of all visitors to B2B and B2C websites trumping all other non-organic channels.”
This means one thing.
You need to figure out the relationship between content marketing strategies and keyword rankings.
This is instrumental in fine-tuning your content marketing campaign and finding the right areas to focus on.
In this post, I analyze data from multiple studies and draw on my own knowledge and experience to give you a clear idea of the content strategies demanding the most attention.
So, let’s see which strategies have the biggest impact on keyword rankings.
Rich content
I won’t waste your time telling you about the importance of creating quality content.
You already know that.
But I’d like to share with you this statistic from an infographic on Quick Sprout:
That’s a lot of links!
And I’m sure you know the integral role links play in SEO.
This graph from Moz illustrates the importance of links and their influence on Google’s algorithm:
Let’s put this information together.
When you create rich content, it gets you more links.
These links improve your overall SEO, which improves your rankings.
So, being diligent about achieving and maintaining rigorous quality standards should be of the utmost concern.
Long-form content
Here’s the deal with long-form content.
It’s hot right now. Scorching hot.
I remember a few years ago when your average blog post was only somewhere around 500 words.
But if you look at the vast majority of content that ranks on page one of Google SERPs today, it’s rare that you’ll find anything under 1,000 words.
To prove just how important long-form has become, I would like to show you a couple of graphs.
The first is from a fairly old (September 2012) article I wrote on Quick Sprout.
I got the data from research performed by SerpIQ:
As you can see, every single piece of content that ranked on the first page had at least 2,000 words.
More specifically,
The first result typically has 2,416 words and the 10th result has 2,032 words.
Newer research (September 2016) from Brian Dean of Backlinko shows a similar pattern:
According to his research,
The average word count of a Google first page result is 1,890.
That’s over 500 words fewer than the original research from SerpIQ indicated back in 2012…526 to be exact.
But it still shows us long-form content is a key element in achieving solid rankings.
Why is this so?
The way I look at it, there are two main reasons for this phenomenon.
First, people have a tendency to scan through content these days.
Few actually sit down and read a 2,000-word piece word for word in its entirety.
Instead, they scan through and look at the sub-headers that grab their attention and may read little snippets of text from there.
Long-form content facilitates this new method of reading.
Second, a longer word count tends to translate into more links.
And this makes sense.
The more content you provide, the more opportunities for it to be linked to.
Put all this together, and you can see that long-form content means higher rankings.
Who knows, the whole “long-form content bubble” may pop in a few years.
But it’s stronger than ever at the moment.
However, it appears that the ideal word count has been reduced considerably, and you should aim for just south of 2,000 words.
How do you create 2,000-word content?
Decide on a specific and narrow topic.
Create a compelling title.
Discuss the issue from every angle.
Provide as much detail as possible.
If possible, provide step-by-step instructions on how to do something.
You should never stuff your articles with words just for the sake of hitting a word count.
But you should strive for detail, depth, clarity, and mastery of a subject matter.
Here’s what I’ve discovered about long-form content. When you truly make an effort to provide value in your content, it expands in length.
That’s not to say that you can’t provide value with a 400-word article.
But the level of value created in a 2,000-word article is usually much greater.
Content with “topical relevance”
But the plot thickens.
The same Backlinko article also points out that
content rated as “topically relevant” significantly outperformed content that didn’t cover a topic in-depth. Therefore, publishing focused content that covers a single topic may help with rankings.
Topical relevance basically combines my first two points of creating rich content and long-form content.
It simply means that Google values content that’s comprehensive and that thoroughly covers a topic.
This means it’s best to focus on a single topic for each piece of content you create.
Rather than bouncing around from subject to subject, you’re better off going all in on a single topic and leaving no stone unturned.
Does this mean you can’t discuss other topics?
No. In fact, you should touch on as many relevant topics as possible! But your focus should be on a single topic.
If you feel you need to cover a topic you weren’t able to get around to in the post, create a separate piece of content and cover it in-depth as well.
Using long-tail keywords
This strategy has been in existence seemingly since the dawn of SEO—back when SEO was in its primordial soup stage.
One of the main ways small-scale marketers have been competing with the big dogs is by using long-tail keywords.
And why wouldn’t they? It freaking works.
In fact, I’ve been using this strategy for years.
I even used it to grow my search traffic by 51% in just three months!
And guess what? It still works brilliantly.
An infographic from Adept states that “pages optimized for long-tail keywords move up 11 positions on average, compared to just 5 positions for head keywords.”
It’s really not rocket science.
Using long-tail keywords means less competition, which means a greater likelihood of achieving a favorable ranking.
The awesome thing is that long-tail searches account for roughly 70 percent of searches:
This means there’s plenty of opportunity out there.
Of course, you won’t get the same volume of traffic that you would for a head keyword or broad keyword, but you can still generate some sizable traffic if you do your keyword research and choose a phrase that receives a reasonable number of searches.
Check out this post from NeilPatel.com for a step-by-step walkthrough of integrating long-tail keywords into your blog posts.
The process is fairly straightforward:
Do your typical keyword research (using Google AdWords Keyword Planner or your preferred tool)
Select the long-tail keywords from the list (3 words or more)
Use these keywords in your content.
Image-rich content
If you haven’t heard, people respond positively to images.
It’s true.
And although I think the whole visual-centric discussion has been done to death, I would like to reference one more point from the Backlinko article I mentioned earlier.
According to Brian Dean,
Industry studies have found that image-rich pages tend to generate more total views and social shares.
But here’s the interesting thing.
Using at least one image is much better than not using any images at all.
However, they couldn’t find a correlation between the total number of images and rankings.
That means there’s no proof that using a lot of images will improve your rankings any further.
In other words, using just one image would in theory have the same effect as using 10 or more images.
The key takeaway is this:
Using a single image is clearly better than zero images. Including lots of images doesn’t seem to have an impact on search engine rankings.
When it comes to my posts, this information isn’t going to stop me from sprinkling plenty of images throughout my content.
In fact, you probably know that many of my posts are jam-packed with images.
I think my audience enjoys the “eye candy,” and graphs in particular are excellent for explaining fairly complex concepts.
But keep this in mind when creating your next piece of content: going nuts with images probably isn’t necessary.
Direct answers
If you’re not sure what I mean by “direct answers,” it’s simple.
Google is now starting to show direct answers when you use a “how to,” “what is,” “who is,” etc. type of search.
Here’s an example:
The first thing that pops up at the top of the page is a clip from the top ranking site.
It’s a way to streamline the process and offer searchers direct information without them having to actually click on the link.
Of course, oftentimes they’ll still click on the link to find more in-depth information.
I know I often do.
So, here’s the deal.
Providing a direct answer can be beneficial and a viable strategy for killing it on SERPs.
If you can provide a quick, logical, and direct answer, especially for a long-tail keyword phrase, there’s a good chance you can get your content featured at the top.
Just be sure your direct answer transitions smoothly into the rest of your content.
Here’s how I typically use this strategy:
Identify a question marketers are asking.
Create an article answering this question.
Provide a step-by-step solution to the issue.
When I follow this three-step process, the articles I write on those topics usually rank on page one for the associated keyword within five days or less.
This is the primary technique I’m currently using on NeilPatel.com, and it’s earned me over 800,000 unique monthly visitors.
Conclusion
I value objectivity when determining the approach of my content marketing strategy.
I find that examining the cold hard facts clears most biases and preconceived notions I might have.
This is important because this gives me the clearest path to achieving my goals.
While there are countless factors that contribute to keyword rankings, the ones I listed here appear to have the biggest impact pound-for-pound.
Putting your attention on these key areas should ensure that your content marketing is heading in the right direction while giving you the best chance of climbing in the SERPs.
https://www.quicksprout.com/2019/03/27/which-content-marketing-strategies-have-the-biggest-impact-on-keyword-rankings/ Read more here - http://review-and-bonuss.blogspot.com/2019/03/which-content-marketing-strategies-have.html
0 notes
siliconwebx · 5 years
Text
How to Read for Personal and Professional Growth
People are notoriously bad readers, especially when it comes to online content. We scan and skim to pull out the chunks of information that are most appealing to us. Digest small bits at a time, never finishing an entire article. Make comments, sometimes harsh ones, that clearly show we don’t understand how to read.
You don’t wanna be that type of reader. You’re better than that.
This article isn’t about learning how to read – we assume you’ve already mastered that. It’s also not about figuring out how to read more. A person who has read a lot is not necessarily well read.
Instead, this article is about how to squeeze information, knowledge, insight and wisdom from the articles and books you thoughtfully choose to read – and how to glean some of that good stuff from the books you read not-so-deeply.
Set a Reading Goal
Assuming you need to jump head first into a topic and come out dripping in wisdom, it’s going to be difficult to do that without a reading goal. We want to loosely adhere to the SMART system of goal-setting here. SMART = specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, time-bound.
I recently wrote about how blockchain is influencing other industries. Completely new territory for me. I had to research a lot before I could get started writing. Here’s how I broke down my goal:
Specific: I would discover what blockchain is and what it’s used for, plus three non-cryptocurrency industries that are adapting blockchain technology.
Attainable: I knew zero and the article I was writing was for a beginner audience, so I had to go just one level up in my understanding.
Relevant: I only sourced articles that were published within the past year.
You’ll notice that I skipped “measurable” and “time-bound” – I didn’t feel they mattered for this specific goal. Also, the whole reading process I’m going to lay out is the measurable part.
If you want to tackle a topic that’s two or three levels above your familiarity, that’s fine, even worthwhile. You’ll just want to start with basic, background knowledge first so you can build upon it.
Open Up to the Unknown
Remembering and recalling information is closer to memorization than true learning. A baby can learn how to say certain words and even associate those words with items, but does that mean they have an actual understanding of what the word means or why they’re saying it?
The best way to truly learn about a topic is to read content about that topic that you don’t understand at first. If you read information you easily grasp, you’re not really learning anything new. By reading fresh, complex information, though, you start to build a bridge between what you currently know and what the writer – the expert – knows.
Learning how to read is a lot like learning how to learn. And how do we learn best? By actively discovering something that’s foreign to us. As you’re reading, pause and research the sub-topics and phrases that you don’t understand or mark them for later.
Spoiler alert: at the end of the article or book, you still won’t understand everything you read. That’s kind of the point.
So you’re at the end and you’ve only grasped 60% of what you read. Now re-read it or find an alternative source. You’ll be armed with that 60% of new knowledge and chances are you’ll make some progress on that still-unknown 40 percent.
Embrace the 4 Stages of Reading
How to Read a Book: The Classic Guide to Intelligent Reading by Mortimer J. Adler and Charles Van Doren outlines four stages of reading, with each stage leading to the next.
Elementary: This is the type of reading you learn in, you guessed it, elementary school.
Inspectional: This is the type of reading most people do online (more on that in a bit). It can be either skimming, which is when you quickly look through the content to see if you want to read part of it, or superficial, which is when you read everything written but don’t get too deep (what you do with a thriller or beach read).
Analytical: You’re absorbing and engaging with what you’re reading. You understand the terms the writer is using, you get what the main argument is and you can determine whether or not those arguments are resolved. You may also decide the writer’s wrong about some points or that certain thoughts are illogical.
Syntopical: Not only are you reading analytically, but you’re developing your knowledge based on what you’ve read, your own experiences and how you feel about it all. The book is simply one of the tools you use to create your own outlook and understanding. You’ve made what you learned your own.
Become a Master Reader
If you want to flex your syntopical reading muscle, pick up the newspaper (let’s get real – bring it up online).
First, read it as you usually do. Skim the headlines for something that interests you and superficially read part of the article. Done. You’ve learned enough to hold a (short) conversation over dinner tonight.
We’re going to do things differently this time.
Pick an article that’s out of your comfort zone, a topic you don’t understand much about. Read it carefully. When you don’t understand a term that’s used, look it up. If you don’t get a reference to another news story, find it and read it. Round out the information so you actually, fully understand what the writer is saying.
Next, look up four more articles on the same topic. Try to find different sources – if you get all of your articles from the same newspaper, facts and perspectives will be repeated. Read those four articles analytically, too.
Sub-steps of the greater syntopical step.
You don’t have to read every single thing. Start by skimming to discover the sections that will be most important to your goal.
Different authors will use different terms for the same thing. Start to create your own terms and language to streamline the information you take in.
Define the questions you want answered, which may differ from the questions the writer is trying to answer.
Pay attention to every side of an issue. Gather information from all perspectives in order to form your own informed and intelligent answers.
You understand what you’ve read – and you’ve read a lot. You get what each writer is saying, the points they’re making, the knowledge they’ve brought to the table.
Say it out loud, whether that’s through a conversation with a friend, your blog or a private Word document. Your challenge is to form your own opinion. Talk about where you match up with the writer’s opinion, where you wholeheartedly disagree and where you fall into a gray area that wasn’t covered in anything you read.
Congratulations. You’ve just become a syntopic reader.
Choose the Right Reading Method
Thorough reading takes a lot of focus and brainpower, and it doesn’t always have its place. I can read Stephen King superficially and get exactly as much out of the experience as I want, no more and no less. If part of my personal growth includes having conversations with my friend who’s also a Stephen King fan, then I’ve done my job.
If I were to analytically read Stephen King novels, I’d (a) take time classifying the book as horror, thriller or suspense, (b) try to understand why he always, always over-describes technology we’ve all used forever and (c) probably turn myself off to Stephen King for life because this is just too much work.
You don’t have to turn what you’re reading into a job if that’s not the goal. There’s a lot to be said for skimming or reading superficially, or reading part of a book analytically and then superficially reading the parts that don’t impact you (my favorite tip for getting through a self-improvement book). When you purposely read less analytically, you also have the option to stop reading cold turkey if you’re not enjoying the book or you’re not getting out of it what you want to.
If you’re an avid reader, knowing why you’re reading and adapting your reading style to that goal is a way to save energy for the times you do need or want to be analytical or syntopic.
Making All This Work in Real Life
In a perfect world, you’d have a clear idea of what topics you want to dive further into, easily gather the necessary content for that deep dive, have the time to analytically and syntopically explore each of them, then magically find the one person who can have an intelligent conversation about the topic you just became a quasi-expert on.
I live in the real world, though, and most nights my book hits the bridge of my nose as I start to nod off after getting just half a chapter along. Here are my tips for real world reading when life gets in the way. These aren’t a replacement for purposeful reading, but they make great alternatives when you have to negotiate with yourself.
Read out loud. This is a trick I use when I fall into that trap of re-reading the same paragraph multiple times without paying attention. Apparently it’s a real psychological trick, too.
Jot down questions as you read. You may not know all the ways you want to explore the topic when you’re getting started, but questions will arise as you read, which will lead you to other sources.
Use the impress, associate and repeat method. Picture the scenario in your head, associate it with something you already know and then repeat the material by highlighting it and going back to it later.
Pay attention to the connections. It’s not an accident when something you just read relates to something you read last week or last year or even last decade. Your brain is building bridges.
When launching into a conversation with someone, make your first talking point that thing you just read. You may uncover more of your own views as you talk about it out loud.
Getting more out of what you read lets you approach a topic, and conversations about it, in a more educated manner. Not only is this helpful in your personal life to develop skills and have better conversations with people, but it’s especially useful in business. If part of your job is explaining a topic to an audience, you’ll want to do it in a way that’s completely new.
Ready to advance and enhance your knowledge? We have a must-read list just for you web designers out there.
The post How to Read for Personal and Professional Growth appeared first on Elegant Themes Blog.
😉SiliconWebX | 🌐ElegantThemes
0 notes
unlovedaddict · 6 years
Text
This Year Will Be The Year of SEO 2019
The website that would like in order to stay relevant these days should definitely consider getting SEO. SEO firms are able to track almost every aspect of their technique, like increases in rankings, visitors and conversions. The methods which were the simplest (reciprocal links or directory submissions) perform not work anymore, therefore the particular SEOs spend a lot associated with time trying different approaches. The particular Moz Pro is another collection of Tools that check the particular important factors related to your own website's search ranking. Selection of key phrases or phrases plays an important component in an SEO campaign given that it saves you the photos in the dark. In 2019 the particular digital marketing companies can anticipate a lot of voice queries, and by 2020, about 50 percent of the searches will end up being either voice searches or image-based searches. Read our Mobile SEO 2019 Checklist before you decide in order to implement. The particular first facet of optimizing images is definitely including your keywords in this image file name (seo_guide. jpg). The inevitable adjustments that will occur in SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION in the near future are usually abolition of keywords stuffing plus spam backlinks, real-time personalized customer care by online marketers, improvement within the quality of visual articles as a result of creativity of video SEO, optimization associated with websites with conversational keywords plus generating massive quantity of current data. SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION remains one of the lengthy term marketing strategies that function best for companies that are usually looking to improve their on-line visibility. Getting SEO right could influence your business hugely since you start to build organic and natural traffic to your site which in turn will naturally grow without the particular need for any underhanded SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMISATION tactics or even spending tons of money on perfectly powerful but pricey solutions such since Pay Per Click or luxurious ads. Searchmetrics is very pleased to have this partnership along with Elephate, a leading content plus SEO agency with years associated with invaluable experience. However, the particular webmasters can grasp search motor optimization SEO through websites. SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION offers incredible opportunity and accessibility (it's an inherently free advertising channel) to inbound traffic, yet it can be hard in order to know where to start plus what advice to follow. Video can become an important contributor to your own overall SEO and digital marketing and advertising strategy, but it's important in order to be superior on how movie is going to help a person achieve your marketing and SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION goals. If you possess ever been into black-hat SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION, spam, and un-natural links, Search engines will never forgive you plus you could be penalized by google at any time. As mentioned earlier, SEO firms are usually the most experienced in working with various verticals of online marketing, mainly credited to the nature of their own work. Monitoring: Often overlooked, but one associated with the most important areas associated with successful SEO, this section taking walks through how you can monitor your success and tie your own efforts back to real visitors and business, which gives a person the chance to future fine-tune and optimize your programs. PeepCon (which stands for The Someones Conference”) seeks to teach workable SEO and digital marketing classes. See how Matthew required a website from zero in order to one million visits in much less than a year, using the mix of blogging, content advertising, and SEO. Solid being familiar with of the keywords, questions, plus phrases your ideal customers employ to find your products and even services is critical to powerful SEO. 34. Applying SEO practices (such keyword optimization) to social media marketing raises discoverability when users search cultural platforms like Facebook and Youtube . com. Onsite SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION Guide — If you the particular actual link, you will notice a opt-in button where a person can download the Onsite SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION Guide. ” Matt Diggity will a lot of testing upon his own sites, and this guideline reflects what on page strategies are working best for your pet. One important aspect associated with taking care of SEO will be identifying issues that are harming search engine ranking positions plus reducing the traffic you obtain through SERPs. User-generated content like reviews assist SEO through SMO, because this often comes in the type of social shares, likes, or even commenting, or common threads such as hashtags that point back toward a brand. Local SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION services offer a very focused online marketing approach, (it's not really like dropping off brochures upon front-porch steps or paying for a good ad in a local newspapers that could or may not really be seen by a probable client that is actually fascinated in your products or services). Businesses with multiple websites and SEO-agencies can set up report themes. Its search engine marketing group provides expertise in Pay-per-click marketing services, organic SEO and cultural media optimisation. The particular ads that you often notice on various web pages proven and those that also show up on the rightmost side associated with search engine results are inorganic SEO examples. While I nevertheless see this trend in have fun with with many enterprises still within the midst of their electronic transformation, the convergence in the particular MarTech space is creating numerous synergies and opportunities and this particular should be seen as the welcome development for brands plus agencies who are looking intended for an edge in regards in order to their SEO driven content advertising The 7 Common Stereotypes When It Comes To SEO 2019 or outreach strategies. Along with the only complete certainty that SEO's, Website owners may have numerous adjustments to make to web sites under their care in the particular mobile and voice search surroundings. The basics of GOOD SEO hasn't changed for years - even though effectiveness of particular elements offers certainly narrowed or changed within type of usefulness - a person should still be focusing upon building a simple site making use of VERY simple SEO best practices - don't perspiration the small stuff, while all-the-time paying attention to the essential stuff - add plenty of unique PAGE TITLES and lots associated with new ORIGINAL CONTENT. Keyword research will be THE first step of any kind of SEO campaign. 55 The difference from SEO is many simply depicted as the distinction between paid and unpaid concern ranking searching results. I get into much more detail in SEO Titles on pages: 15-Point Checklist for B2B and B2C Brands, which explains the right way to work in relevant keywords that will accurately reflect the page articles. Are good nevertheless SEO potential may be reduced in comparison to single links. The training behind our SEO expertise has been developed from years and many years of learning from mistakes marketing and advertising with our other businesses. Our own in-depth guide contains the most recent SEO best practices so a person can improve how your content articles appears in search results, plus get more traffic, leads, plus sales. Keyword analysis definitely belongs to the SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION basics. I'll start by stating that social press and SEO are heavily linked to each other. Black head wear SEO attempts to improve ratings in ways that are disapproved of with the search engines, or even involve deception. This particular is more tedious and tasking than inorganic SEO because this particular is how all the key phrases get a full blast associated with attention. SEO: It stands for Lookup Engine Optimization. Within this post, we will break this down in the complete first timers guide to SEO: what SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION is, how it works, exactly what factors affect search and exactly what sorts of changes you may make today to improve your own search optimization. The no follow hyperlink has been contradicted many periods over where SEO is included and it depends on the particular web owner regarding if these people allow them on the web site or not. Also companies considering about getting Search engine search engine optimization services should go through these types of magazines to familiarize themselves making use of the latest trends within the particular SEO and web-based marketing market to allow them to determine the assistance offered for all of them from the selected SEO companies. Mobile SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION in 2018 will be all regarding Progressive Web Apps (PWAs). The term SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION also describes the making internet pages easier for internet lookup engine indexing software, known since "crawlers, " to find, check out, and index your blog. I feel that technical SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION mistakes that affect crawl spending budget - and also pollute Search engines with non-SEO-friendly content such since social landing pages, WordPress press archives, offer pages and cloned e-commerce product pages - can have a far more detrimental effect upon sites moving forward. Effective SEO lets you improve your web​site to demonstrate up within search engines. Many of us will get into how in order to pick the best keywords intended for your business later in this kind of SEO guide, but it best you to know how to be able to use them, as they will be referenced throughout this section. Despite the fact that meta descriptions are not a new ranking factor for search search engines, they do hold value regarding your website and are element of your SEO presence. Let us speak a bit as to exactly what SEO is before we enter the SEO article writing recommendations for people who may become new or do not very understand it. SEO stands intended for Seo. In 2018, SEO is content and content material is SEO, content is electronic and digital is content. Before starting a good SEO project, site owners ought to carefully read through the site owner guidelines that every search motors provides and follow recommended greatest practices. This is clear that when website owners hire a search engine optimisation SEO expert, they stand the better chance of maximizing their own SEO services. Search motors cannot understand this type associated with content, so it's essential to style video pages in an SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION oriented manner. Subscribe to our weekly SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION and daily SearchCap newsletters for a summarize of all the latest SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION related news, tips and techniques from Internet search engine Property and other sources all more than the Web. When you aren't logged in, go to SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION Toolkit » Keyword Research » Keyword Overview. For just about any SEO technique to operate successfully you will need content and that will can come in any type like keywords, articles or websites. From 2019, AI can be utilized by the businesses to acquire higher rankings upon search engines. As a result, it can be a great idea to incorporate expenses with regard to professional SEO content in your own quarterly marketing budget. Google will see right via sneaky, black hat SEO strategies like creating duplicate pages, generating pages with thin content simply for the sake of obtaining more pages and buying inbound links. Because it turns out, there's more in order to on-page SEO than optimizing with regard to keywords. Search engines motor optimization (organic SEO) describes the particular methods used to obtain the high placement (or ranking) upon a search engine results web page in unpaid, algorithm-driven results upon the given search engine. Also, videos possess a lot of untapped probable - great for SEO in addition to make for good user proposal. The quite best SEO expert 2019 can tell you for High-End mobile devices, we're seeing more format changes to focus, provide the better experience, search results. Social SEO is especially helpful for online reputation administration. It isn't just the approach that Google ranks optimized articles, but the way that these people rank poorly constructed or taboo content that will push your own ranking to where it really should to be in 2019. Ray Cheselka, SEO & Google adwords Manager at SEO and style agency, webFEAT Complete, predicts that will sites with over a 2 second load time will become penalized, and search intent is definitely going to carry on and grow within importance. SEO consists of ordering the site's architecture and hyperlinks to make pages inside the particular website easier to find plus navigate. In contrast, articles that no one is humming about have minimal effect upon social SEO. They are usually generally knowledgeable within the are usually of both SEO and content material marketing. When it arrives to reviews, customers work as a good army of link builders plus keyword writers so your SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION structure is shaped without a person having to lift a little finger. You will become introduced to the foundational components of how search engines such as google work, how the SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION landscape is promoting and exactly what you can expect in the particular future. The SISTRIX Toolbox consists associated with six modules 1) SEO, 2) Universal, 3) Links, 4) Advertisements, 5) Social and 6) Optimizer. Low-quality content can severely impact the achievements of SEO, within 2018. When your own SEO starts building strong coffee grounds, competitors can start maligning your own SEO backlinks. ” With content marketing spend anticipated to reach $300 billion by 2019, this statistic is worrisome. Now the electronic marketing companies know how in order to use AI for SEO, plus in coming years AI can dominate in developing the SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION strategies of the digital marketing and advertising companies. Ray Cheselka, AdWords and SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION Manager at webFEAT Complete, the design and SEO agency, states that in 2019 search purpose will continue to become even more important. Expert writers of SEO articles may take the time to study the particular industry or specific niche market market. 2 tools to help with nearby SEO are BrightLocal (for rankings) and MozLocal (for local lookup optimization). Concerning on-page SEO best practices, I usually link out to other quality appropriate pages on other websites exactly where possible and where a human being would find it valuable. It includes a favorite Routine Table of SEO Success Factors”, a 9-chapter guide to SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION basics, and links to several from the site's most useful blog posts. Off-page SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION targets increasing the authority associated with your domain through the act associated with getting links from all additional websites. Regarding: Search Engine Journal's flagship meeting, SEJ Summit, is dedicated to providing SEO pros the actual require, with an agenda of initial, first-run presentations covering the newest SEO and PPC tactics through renowned experts, plus excellent social networking opportunities. SEO combines official research engine guidelines, empirical knowledge, plus theoretical knowledge from science documents or patents. This will be a half-day workshop at LeadsCon that will be designed in order to give attendees an end-to-end look at of Search Engine Optimization (SEO), how it works, and concrete things they can do these Blog9T days to improve their SEO efficiency. After the Search engines Panda algorithm appeared, SEO professionals realized just how much key word frequency and density matters. SEO means optimizing your content articles so it shows up even more often in search results. 33. With social media systems like Facebook diminishing visibility associated with companies and brands, SEO (as well as paid promotion) is usually becoming critically important for traveling traffic to your social stations. 2019 dates TBD. ). Why go to: One-track conference full of forward-thinking, tactical sessions in SEO, development marketing, the mobile landscape, analytics, content marketing and more. ” Don't miss the LeadsCon Meeting in Vegas, March 4-6, 2019. Performing SEO upon your own websites is the great method to practice plus hone your SEO ability. We optimize your web site both of internal and exterior factors thats Google's engine rely on and reliable for top position search result, Gurantee your SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION ranking No succeed can refundable. Looking deeper: An SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION cost often means one associated with two things: the investment inside your organic search strategy, or exactly how much you pay for compensated search engine marketing (SEM) providers like Google AdWords. All of us are dealing with new methods designed to target old design SEO tactics and that concentrate around the truism that DOMAIN NAME ‘REPUTATION' plus Plenty of WEBPAGES plus SEO equals Plenty associated with Keywords equals LOTS of Search engines traffic. BrightonSEO is a one-day search marketing and advertising conference and series of coaching courses held, unsurprisingly, in Brighton. From narrowing straight down target markets to changing the particular way content is written, AI and voice search will possess a continuous effect on SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION moving forward. One aspect of SEO is definitely link building, which we will certainly discuss slightly below, which generally leads to thin content. Applications for the particular 2018-2019 cycle of the SEO Enhance programme are now closed and even will re-open again in Planting season 2019. SEO could be difficult because search engines are often reevaluating and changing how they will prioritize search engine results. Moreover, it will help SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION by gaining backlinks, likes, responses or shares. There are usually lots of ways to discover keywords for SEO. SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION article writing guidelines number two. Keywords, they are little concealed subliminal messages within the composing which are to be within conjunction with the topic which usually is being written on. Key phrases are extremely important to the particular SEO article writing guidelines. SEO is often component of an overall internet advertising strategy and complements other techniques like social media marketing, articles marketing and more. The conference brought together thirty-six speakers, 15 sponsors and around 1500 of the search industry's brightest and the best regarding search for a day regarding actionable SEO advice and industry leading content. A principal benefit associated with SEO is its cost-effectiveness because there is no payment toward the search engine for getting placed within it. This will be very important for the 'search head', high volume low objective searches that are expensive within paid search. In 2019, I believe that will Google will continue to force paid search ads and state the majority of the over the fold organic SERP. Since, paying a search motor to put your business web site at the top of the list doesn't come cheap, the particular next smartest thing one may do is to use lookup engine optimization or SEO methods to increase the clicks in the direction of the website and help this work its way up the particular search engine's results page. If you are nevertheless sticking with old SEO protocol strategies and searching optimized key phrase for the article, Sorry! One thing will be crystal clear: if you would like people to discover your function, you need search engine marketing (SEO). This most means when you're thinking regarding your SEO strategy, you require to think about how your own social media marketing strategy fits into the particular puzzle, too. As your visitors slowly increases, ensure that you include various other SEO strategies (like adding exterior and internal links, guest publishing, etc) to engage more customers and keep your metrics higher. Google has still left a very narrow band associated with opportunity when it comes in order to SEO - and punishments are made to take you out associated with the game for some period while you cleanup the infractions. Head of Marketing, Shiny Edstrom, at BioClarity, a San Diego based health-science company, feels that SEO is going in order to see a decreased importance within 2019, and SEOs should begin ensuring they're competent in SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION. The best rank that you could see the profile with contact information and maps on right hands side of search result web page is achieved after long treatment for using SEO tactics. Numerous search engine optimisation. Search Engine Optimization (SEO) is the technique of customizing a website for search motor discovery and indexing. SEO is actually a technique which search motors require that sites must boost properly, so that they show up high in search results. The European Search Honours is an international competition that will shines the spotlight around the best SEO and Content Marketing companies in Europe. Regarding successful team management and inter-client cooperation, online editors really are usually a must, especially those which usually detect and highlight critical SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION errors, non-unique, text, and key word stuffing. By the end of this particular module, you should be capable to define Search Engine Search engine optimization and explain the basics associated with SEO as being a business (as properly as how SEO shapes the particular Internet itself. ) You'll furthermore be able to explain the particular differences between three main SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION job types, and be ready to choose a career that will best suits your current objectives. A highly effective research marketing campaign, will encompass each search engine optimisation (SEO) plus pay per click advertising (PPC). One of our favorite on the internet toolkits is SEMrush, which consists of a variety of tools with regard to SEO, content marketing, and internet marketing. An SEO Content Writer is usually somebody who writes content for the particular purpose of having it display up on search engines plus gain website visitors. Internet marketing perfect for the platform of SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION or Seo. With voice search arrives two areas of interest in order to SEO folks wishing to link with consumers: intent and framework. SocialSEO is proud to help future experts in the globe of business and marketing along with the annual SocialSEO Digital Advertising and SEO Scholarship. Finally SEO Wise links enables you to arranged nofollow attribute and open hyperlinks in new window. An extensive dental marketing plus dental SEO campaign can end up being attained by the enterprise just if the web address associated with a dental practice contains in to all the promotional materials with regard to the business. This shows the importance of focussing voice search engine results within order to grow your company, marketing, and Search Engine Optimization(SEO) strategies. They accomplish this by increasing their web site rank through a method known as SEO or even search engine optimization. Just like just about all other SEO approaches, be certain your links are appropriate, plus be careful to not cross the particular line into excessive linking : you don't want your site visitors to obtain annoyed. Bryan Yeager, Research Director at Gartner, can share 9 Key Insights through Gartner's Marketing Technology Survey in order to Help You Prepare for 2019 and Beyond. SEO is a combination associated with digital marketing efforts all operating together to increase a website's value to users and presence in search. On-page SEO (also identified as "on-site" SEO) could be the action of optimizing different parts associated with your site that affect your own search engine rankings. In 2019, we will have to optimize voice research answers with CTAs that Google's algorithms don't pick up upon, but humans do. Dan Mallette, Lead SEO Strategist at each InVue Digital & HearstDMS, forecasts that SEOs will need in order to optimize for voice search and discover new avenues as SERP real-estate shrinks. Obviously, a social networking site that has more interaction will probably bring bigger SEO benefits to be able to some business than one the fact that has less interaction, but simply having a social presence will be a good start.
0 notes
webanalytics · 7 years
Text
5 Lies You Tell Yourself About Your Analytics (And How to Fix It)
Consulting data is good.
But being a slave to data, is not.
There is such a thing as being too data-obsessed. Confirmation bias pops up. And you miss the good, albeit, intangible stuff that comes along with your efforts.
The solution is to uncover those biases and misunderstandings that lead you astray.
It’s not easy. Or even intuitive. But it’s the only way to avoid these five analytics blinders.
Here’s how it strikes when you least expect it.
Here’s why you fall for it.
And here’s how to avoid it by bringing in other types of feedback and analysis.
Lie #1. Your “Conversions” Are Flawless
You’ve got three AdWords campaigns.
The first brings in zero leads on $78 bucks spent.
The second brings in one at a cost of $135.31.
The third brings in two at $143.28 per lead.
Nine times out of ten, the campaign with more “conversions” is declared the winner.
But what do you really, truly, know about this scenario?
Which campaign is actually performing the best? Which is putting the most money back into your pocket?
There’s simply no way to tell at this point.
First and foremost, these “conversions” are leads — not closed customers.
Second, they might be for different products or services. So different average order values or LTVs come into play.
Third, this is nowhere close to statistical significance. For example, the third campaign has the most leads because you’ve spent the most money on it.
Not because it’s “better.”
What if you simply spend the same amount on the first two? What if you let them both get to around the same ~$150/per mark?
See what I mean?
Too many “what ifs” for my taste.
Yet this is exactly what happens inside any marketing department. The same end result pops up after each client or superior meeting.
Everyone points to the third campaign. It gets the adulation. It gets the increased budget. It gets the additional staff and resources.
So it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
One solution to figure all this out is closed loop analysis.
Ideally, your goal is to match up the customer’s information (name, email, phone, credit card) to the lead data you’re seeing inside Google Analytics.
Haha — just kidding.
That would mean you were gathering Personally Identifiable Information, which is a big no-no in Google Analytics.
Do it and they’ll delete your account right away.
The simplest alternative is to just use a tool that gives you this power, without jeopardizing your data. Hint, hint.
Lie #2. Your “Top” Traffic Sources
What are your top sources of traffic?
A quick glance inside Google Analytics usually tells you (1) organic search and (2) direct. Maybe a little (3) referrals thrown in for good measure if you got some press last month.
Here’s the problem.
Two of those three are legit. The other is not.
The problem is that your direct traffic isn’t, in reality, all that “direct.”
Technically, this should be the number of people typing in your website URL to the address bar and hitting “Enter.”
Instead, it’s a healthy mix of email, social media, and good ol’ organic search.
The bigger the site, the bigger this problem usually is.
For example, The Atlantic couldn’t account for or explain how 25% of their visitors came to their site.
One of the biggest publishers in the world. One of the most respected. Who gets paid based on the number of visitors and page views they get. Has no idea how a quarter of their traffic is getting to their site.
That ain’t good.
But how can you really tell where people are coming from, if most analytics programs can’t tell you with any degree of accuracy?
For instance, let’s say your new, fantastic-looking email campaign is about to go out.
It’s been given the green light. “Legal” gives you the A-OK.
But wait! You didn’t tag the promo links correctly.
Now, you’ve spent all that time on a campaign that won’t have anything to show for it, because the traffic you get will now end up in the dumpster pile officially known as “Direct traffic.”
This isn’t just an email. It affects each and every social message, press mention, and blog post referral, too.
It can even affect your organic search traffic.
Groupon found this out the hard way. Literally. By completely de-indexing themselves for a few hours.
What did those crazy couponers find? That nearly 60% of their direct traffic was actually coming from organic search.
Sixty-freaking-percent.
But don’t freak out just yet. There are solutions here.
First, you can use Google’s UTM builder to make sure you are properly tagging your links. This means any and everything you have control over.
Manually tag them before they head out the door, or copy & paste into a lightweight app like Terminus.
If you’ve got long, cumbersome URL, you can be pretty sure that any traffic to that page didn’t come from Direct traffic.
People aren’t going to remember it. Which means they aren’t going to just spontaneously type it in.
Instead, these peeps probably came from another place, like an organic search or email.
However, in the same breath, you can probably consider homepage traffic to be legitimate Direct.
So create a segment based on these URLs and traffic sources to pinpoint “Dark Traffic” in its tracks. And prevent it from ruining your data in the future.
Lie #3. Top of the Funnel Performance = Results
Yes, we want traffic.
Yes, we want pageviews.
They make us feel all warm and fuzzy and proud. Like our hard work isn’t going unnoticed.
But they should not be the end-all, be-all.
Use them to see how you’re doing over last month. But don’t misunderstand numbers to be the Holy Grail, either.
Like this, for instance:
Looking at only this, you walk away feeling like a boss for all the numbers you’ve racked up. Seriously, I can’t even count that high.
But what about when you consider the bounce and exit rates for each of those pages? Are people staying? No? Color you embarrassed.
Are you still so excited by your thousands of pageviews if most of them left immediately?
Bounce rates are real. And you’ve gotta consider them when you are looking at your metrics.
They mean that people haven’t had the chance to interact with your soft micro conversions. They haven’t had a chance to activate.
So take a look at the big picture.
Are your blog posts and site pulling people in, but not making them stay?
This isn’t a horrible problem to have, because it’s a problem you can pinpoint.
The traffic is there. They just don’t really like what they are seeing once they get to your site. Which you can fix.
First, set up some events to get a better idea of what’s happening on your pages. Then, make sure you have actionable goals that will allow for movement you can track.
Or use the Kissmetrics’ Customer Engagement Automation tool to analyze what people are actually doing on your site and with your products. Then, you can interact with behavior-based messaging to keep them around longer. Or keep them coming back for more.
That way, you can increase conversions, engagement, and retention without the guesswork.
Just always remember that numbers don’t tell the whole story. Use them with a grain of salt and a little bit of context.
Lie #4. Deceptive A/B “Wins”
I’m just going to be honest with you. Those A/B testing “wins” you just got? Don’t always have the best track record.
I’m sorry to be so harsh right off the bat. Sometimes the truth hurts.
What’s even more worrisome? Oftentimes, tests will look like they have succeeded. But that’s not always the case (or at least, not the whole picture).
Start with Google Analytics content experiments, instead.
You can use it to contrast your varying pages to see if there are any sizeable adjustments that cause positive changes.
Instead, it allows you to compare different page variations to see which ‘bigger’ changes result in improvements. Maybe this works a little better because it adds an extra letter– it’s an A/B/N test.
The problem with this test is when you get a little too grab-happy.
You can quickly and easily remove fields to get better results, for instance. A simple reduction of three fields will increase your conversions by 11%.
Or, you can take away specific conversion-busters like the need to add a credit card for a non-paying trial. Sure, this will up your “conversions.”
But remember how far that got you a few lies ago?
That credit card field you took away? It was a huge indicator for which of your customers will eventually buy. 50% of people who put in their credit card will end up converting. While only 15% will of those who don’t enter a credit card will.
And we’re talkin’, conversions-conversions here. Like, bottom-of-the-funnel, paying customer conversions.
Context is key when you are looking at analytics.
Don’t test landing pages or simple changes to fields while only evaluating the top of the funnel. Make sure you dig in to see how the changes affect the rest of the customer experience and journey.
To do that, use the Funnel Report so you can see exactly how top-of-the-funnel changes are impacting bottom-of-the-funnel sales.
Lie #5. Your Channel Source Attribution
A Forrester Research study years ago found that 33% of all transactions of all transactions happened after new customers had gone through more than one touchpoint.
That number jumps to 48% when considering repeat customers.
The same report showed that paid search is the highest source of conversions.
Is it, though?
Or is it just the last point most commonly used before a sale?
Just because it’s the last one, doesn’t mean it’s the only one.
What other marketing tactics are working to increase growth? Forrester went on to declare that while email works for repeat conversions, social media brings in less than 1% of sales.
Ok. Then how do you explain SpearmintLOVE?
You know, the freaking baby blog that boosted their revenue by 991% in year using Facebook and Instagram.
The only reason I know about them? Because my wife has bought clothes from them. After discovering them on Facebook and Instagram.
One, simple Google graph puts this myth to bed. Fast.
If you look at the left side, or “assist interactions,” you’ll see that social channels will put new products in front of people.
As you move toward the middle, customers get more information about products and options using search. At the end, they’re on their way to the website.
Notice all the possible interaction options here. It’s not just the last-touch that brought the customer to the website. They can take many steps to get there.
Google Analytics has a few different attribution options built-in to help you change how conversions are assigned.
Image Source
These include:
Last Non-Direct Click: This will overlook Direct clicks and go to the channel used right before.
First Interaction: This uses the social or advertisement that got them to the website.
Linear: Here, each channel that a customer used before purchasing will get equal attribution.
Time Decay: This will consider the channel that was used immediately before conversion, rather than channels used in the past day/week/month.
Position: This model gives priority to the first and last channel used before conversion. Anything in the middle gets less attribution.
The depressing part, though?
There’s no right answer here. The attribution model you pick largely depends on your sales cycle, your customers, and even what specific objective you’re trying to figure out.
For example, if you’re spending a ton on ads, you might want to see how the First Interaction looks. Especially when using social ads that often bring people into your ecosystem for the very first time.
In other cases? It would be a terrible choice.
The trick is to know what you’re solving for, first. Then working backwards.
Conclusion
Data is important. It’s huge.
YOOGE.
But, be careful.
Google Analytics is a marvelous, cost effective, game changing tool.
However, it’s been known to lie a little from time-to-time. (Yes, we’re still talking about Google Analytics here.)
Remember that conversion results aren’t always spot on. Direct traffic data might not be correct. Vanity metrics aren’t everything. A/B results can fire off false positives. And last touch isn’t everything.
Uncovering biases is never fun.
But it’s the key to creating campaigns that actually achieve results.
Without just blowing a lot of hot air.
About the Author: Brad Smith is the founder of Codeless, a B2B content creation company. Frequent contributor to Kissmetrics, Unbounce, WordStream, AdEspresso, Search Engine Journal, Autopilot, and more.
from Search Results for “analytics” – The Kissmetrics Marketing Blog http://ift.tt/2wkTx6Q #Digital #Analytics #Website
0 notes
samiam03x · 7 years
Text
5 Lies You Tell Yourself About Your Analytics (And How to Fix It)
Consulting data is good.
But being a slave to data is not.
There is such a thing as being too data-obsessed. Confirmation bias pops up. And you miss the good, albeit, intangible stuff that comes along with your efforts.
The solution is to uncover those biases and misunderstandings that lead you astray.
It’s not easy. Or even intuitive. But it’s the only way to avoid these five analytics blinders.
Here’s how it strikes when you least expect it.
Here’s why you fall for it.
And here’s how to avoid it by bringing in other types of feedback and analysis.
Lie #1. Your “Conversions” Are Flawless
You’ve got three AdWords campaigns.
The first brings in zero leads on $78 bucks spent.
The second brings in one at a cost of $135.31.
The third brings in two at $143.28 per lead.
Nine times out of ten, the campaign with more “conversions” is declared the winner.
But what do you really, truly, know about this scenario?
Which campaign is actually performing the best? Which is putting the most money back into your pocket?
There’s simply no way to tell at this point.
First and foremost, these “conversions” are leads — not closed customers.
Second, they might be for different products or services. So different average order values or LTVs come into play.
Third, this is nowhere close to statistical significance. For example, the third campaign has the most leads because you’ve spent the most money on it.
Not because it’s “better.”
What if you simply spend the same amount on the first two? What if you let them both get to around the same ~$150/per mark?
See what I mean?
Too many “what ifs” for my taste.
Yet this is exactly what happens inside any marketing department. The same end result pops up after each client or superior meeting.
Everyone points to the third campaign. It gets the adulation. It gets the increased budget. It gets the additional staff and resources.
So it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
One solution to figure all this out is closed loop analysis.
Ideally, your goal is to match up the customer’s information (name, email, phone, credit card) to the lead data you’re seeing inside Google Analytics.
Haha — just kidding.
That would mean you were gathering Personally Identifiable Information, which is a big no-no in Google Analytics.
Do it and they’ll delete your account right away.
The simplest alternative is to just use a tool that gives you this power, without jeopardizing your data. Hint, hint.
Lie #2. Your “Top” Traffic Sources
What are your top sources of traffic?
A quick glance inside Google Analytics usually tells you (1) organic search and (2) direct. Maybe a little (3) referrals thrown in for good measure if you got some press last month.
Here’s the problem.
Two of those three are legit. The other is not.
The problem is that your direct traffic isn’t, in reality, all that “direct.”
Technically, this should be the number of people typing in your website URL to the address bar and hitting “Enter.”
Instead, it’s a healthy mix of email, social media, and good ol’ organic search.
The bigger the site, the bigger this problem usually is.
For example, The Atlantic couldn’t account for or explain how 25% of their visitors came to their site.
One of the biggest publishers in the world. One of the most respected. Who gets paid based on the number of visitors and page views they get. Has no idea how a quarter of their traffic is getting to their site.
That ain’t good.
But how can you really tell where people are coming from, if most analytics programs can’t tell you with any degree of accuracy?
For instance, let’s say your new, fantastic-looking email campaign is about to go out.
It’s been given the green light. “Legal” gives you the A-OK.
But wait! You didn’t tag the promo links correctly.
Now, you’ve spent all that time on a campaign that won’t have anything to show for it, because the traffic you get will now end up in the dumpster pile officially known as “Direct traffic.”
This isn’t just an email. It affects each and every social message, press mention, and blog post referral, too.
It can even affect your organic search traffic.
Groupon found this out the hard way. Literally. By completely de-indexing themselves for a few hours.
What did those crazy couponers find? That nearly 60% of their direct traffic was actually coming from organic search.
Sixty-freaking-percent.
But don’t freak out just yet. There are solutions here.
First, you can use Google’s UTM builder to make sure you are properly tagging your links. This means any and everything you have control over.
Manually tag them before they head out the door, or copy & paste into a lightweight app like Terminus.
If you’ve got long, cumbersome URL, you can be pretty sure that any traffic to that page didn’t come from Direct traffic.
People aren’t going to remember it. Which means they aren’t going to just spontaneously type it in.
Instead, these peeps probably came from another place, like an organic search or email.
However, in the same breath, you can probably consider homepage traffic to be legitimate Direct.
So create a segment based on these URLs and traffic sources to pinpoint “Dark Traffic” in its tracks. And prevent it from ruining your data in the future.
Lie #3. Top of the Funnel Performance = Results
Yes, we want traffic.
Yes, we want pageviews.
They make us feel all warm and fuzzy and proud. Like our hard work isn’t going unnoticed.
But they should not be the end-all, be-all.
Use them to see how you’re doing over last month. But don’t misunderstand numbers to be the Holy Grail, either.
Like this, for instance:
Looking at only this, you walk away feeling like a boss for all the numbers you’ve racked up. Seriously, I can’t even count that high.
But what about when you consider the bounce and exit rates for each of those pages? Are people staying? No? Color you embarrassed.
Are you still so excited by your thousands of pageviews if most of them left immediately?
Bounce rates are real. And you’ve gotta consider them when you are looking at your metrics.
They mean that people haven’t had the chance to interact with your soft micro conversions. They haven’t had a chance to activate.
So take a look at the big picture.
Are your blog posts and site pulling people in, but not making them stay?
This isn’t a horrible problem to have, because it’s a problem you can pinpoint.
The traffic is there. They just don’t really like what they are seeing once they get to your site. Which you can fix.
First, set up some events to get a better idea of what’s happening on your pages. Then, make sure you have actionable goals that will allow for movement you can track.
Or use the Kissmetrics’ Customer Engagement Automation tool to analyze what people are actually doing on your site and with your products. Then, you can interact with behavior-based messaging to keep them around longer. Or keep them coming back for more.
That way, you can increase conversions, engagement, and retention without the guesswork.
Just always remember that numbers don’t tell the whole story. Use them with a grain of salt and a little bit of context.
Lie #4. Deceptive A/B “Wins”
I’m just going to be honest with you. Those A/B testing “wins” you just got? Don’t always have the best track record.
I’m sorry to be so harsh right off the bat. Sometimes the truth hurts.
What’s even more worrisome? Oftentimes, tests will look like they have succeeded. But that’s not always the case (or at least, not the whole picture).
Start with Google Analytics content experiments, instead.
You can use it to contrast your varying pages to see if there are any sizeable adjustments that cause positive changes.
Instead, it allows you to compare different page variations to see which ‘bigger’ changes result in improvements. Maybe this works a little better because it adds an extra letter– it’s an A/B/N test.
The problem with this test is when you get a little too grab-happy.
You can quickly and easily remove fields to get better results, for instance. A simple reduction of three fields will increase your conversions by 11%.
Or, you can take away specific conversion-busters like the need to add a credit card for a non-paying trial. Sure, this will up your “conversions.”
But remember how far that got you a few lies ago?
That credit card field you took away? It was a huge indicator for which of your customers will eventually buy. 50% of people who put in their credit card will end up converting. While only 15% will of those who don’t enter a credit card will.
And we’re talkin’, conversions-conversions here. Like, bottom-of-the-funnel, paying customer conversions.
Context is key when you are looking at analytics.
Don’t test landing pages or simple changes to fields while only evaluating the top of the funnel. Make sure you dig in to see how the changes affect the rest of the customer experience and journey.
To do that, use the Funnel Report so you can see exactly how top-of-the-funnel changes are impacting bottom-of-the-funnel sales.
Lie #5. Your Channel Source Attribution
A Forrester Research study years ago found that 33% of all transactions of all transactions happened after new customers had gone through more than one touchpoint.
That number jumps to 48% when considering repeat customers.
The same report showed that paid search is the highest source of conversions.
Is it, though?
Or is it just the last point most commonly used before a sale?
Just because it’s the last one, doesn’t mean it’s the only one.
What other marketing tactics are working to increase growth? Forrester went on to declare that while email works for repeat conversions, social media brings in less than 1% of sales.
Ok. Then how do you explain SpearmintLOVE?
You know, the freaking baby blog that boosted their revenue by 991% in year using Facebook and Instagram.
The only reason I know about them? Because my wife has bought clothes from them. After discovering them on Facebook and Instagram.
One, simple Google graph puts this myth to bed. Fast.
If you look at the left side, or “assist interactions,” you’ll see that social channels will put new products in front of people.
As you move toward the middle, customers get more information about products and options using search. At the end, they’re on their way to the website.
Notice all the possible interaction options here. It’s not just the last-touch that brought the customer to the website. They can take many steps to get there.
Google Analytics has a few different attribution options built-in to help you change how conversions are assigned.
Image Source
These include:
Last Non-Direct Click: This will overlook Direct clicks and go to the channel used right before.
First Interaction: This uses the social or advertisement that got them to the website.
Linear: Here, each channel that a customer used before purchasing will get equal attribution.
Time Decay: This will consider the channel that was used immediately before conversion, rather than channels used in the past day/week/month.
Position: This model gives priority to the first and last channel used before conversion. Anything in the middle gets less attribution.
The depressing part, though?
There’s no right answer here. The attribution model you pick largely depends on your sales cycle, your customers, and even what specific objective you’re trying to figure out.
For example, if you’re spending a ton on ads, you might want to see how the First Interaction looks. Especially when using social ads that often bring people into your ecosystem for the very first time.
In other cases? It would be a terrible choice.
The trick is to know what you’re solving for, first. Then working backwards.
Conclusion
Data is important. It’s huge.
YOOGE.
But, be careful.
Google Analytics is a marvelous, cost effective, game-changing tool.
However, it’s been known to lie a little from time-to-time. (Yes, we’re still talking about Google Analytics here.)
Remember that conversion results aren’t always spot on. Direct traffic data might not be correct. Vanity metrics aren’t everything. A/B results can fire off false positives. And last touch isn’t everything.
Uncovering biases is never fun.
But it’s the key to creating campaigns that actually achieve results.
Without just blowing a lot of hot air.
About the Author: Brad Smith is the founder of Codeless, a B2B content creation company. Frequent contributor to Kissmetrics, Unbounce, WordStream, AdEspresso, Search Engine Journal, Autopilot, and more.
http://ift.tt/2eSlhd1 from MarketingRSS http://ift.tt/2xW6h58 via Youtube
0 notes
marie85marketing · 7 years
Text
5 Lies You Tell Yourself About Your Analytics (And How to Fix It)
Consulting data is good.
But being a slave to data is not.
There is such a thing as being too data-obsessed. Confirmation bias pops up. And you miss the good, albeit, intangible stuff that comes along with your efforts.
The solution is to uncover those biases and misunderstandings that lead you astray.
It’s not easy. Or even intuitive. But it’s the only way to avoid these five analytics blinders.
Here’s how it strikes when you least expect it.
Here’s why you fall for it.
And here’s how to avoid it by bringing in other types of feedback and analysis.
Lie #1. Your “Conversions” Are Flawless
You’ve got three AdWords campaigns.
The first brings in zero leads on $78 bucks spent.
The second brings in one at a cost of $135.31.
The third brings in two at $143.28 per lead.
Nine times out of ten, the campaign with more “conversions” is declared the winner.
But what do you really, truly, know about this scenario?
Which campaign is actually performing the best? Which is putting the most money back into your pocket?
There’s simply no way to tell at this point.
First and foremost, these “conversions” are leads — not closed customers.
Second, they might be for different products or services. So different average order values or LTVs come into play.
Third, this is nowhere close to statistical significance. For example, the third campaign has the most leads because you’ve spent the most money on it.
Not because it’s “better.”
What if you simply spend the same amount on the first two? What if you let them both get to around the same ~$150/per mark?
See what I mean?
Too many “what ifs” for my taste.
Yet this is exactly what happens inside any marketing department. The same end result pops up after each client or superior meeting.
Everyone points to the third campaign. It gets the adulation. It gets the increased budget. It gets the additional staff and resources.
So it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
One solution to figure all this out is closed loop analysis.
Ideally, your goal is to match up the customer’s information (name, email, phone, credit card) to the lead data you’re seeing inside Google Analytics.
Haha — just kidding.
That would mean you were gathering Personally Identifiable Information, which is a big no-no in Google Analytics.
Do it and they’ll delete your account right away.
The simplest alternative is to just use a tool that gives you this power, without jeopardizing your data. Hint, hint.
Lie #2. Your “Top” Traffic Sources
What are your top sources of traffic?
A quick glance inside Google Analytics usually tells you (1) organic search and (2) direct. Maybe a little (3) referrals thrown in for good measure if you got some press last month.
Here’s the problem.
Two of those three are legit. The other is not.
The problem is that your direct traffic isn’t, in reality, all that “direct.”
Technically, this should be the number of people typing in your website URL to the address bar and hitting “Enter.”
Instead, it’s a healthy mix of email, social media, and good ol’ organic search.
The bigger the site, the bigger this problem usually is.
For example, The Atlantic couldn’t account for or explain how 25% of their visitors came to their site.
One of the biggest publishers in the world. One of the most respected. Who gets paid based on the number of visitors and page views they get. Has no idea how a quarter of their traffic is getting to their site.
That ain’t good.
But how can you really tell where people are coming from, if most analytics programs can’t tell you with any degree of accuracy?
For instance, let’s say your new, fantastic-looking email campaign is about to go out.
It’s been given the green light. “Legal” gives you the A-OK.
But wait! You didn’t tag the promo links correctly.
Now, you’ve spent all that time on a campaign that won’t have anything to show for it, because the traffic you get will now end up in the dumpster pile officially known as “Direct traffic.”
This isn’t just an email. It affects each and every social message, press mention, and blog post referral, too.
It can even affect your organic search traffic.
Groupon found this out the hard way. Literally. By completely de-indexing themselves for a few hours.
What did those crazy couponers find? That nearly 60% of their direct traffic was actually coming from organic search.
Sixty-freaking-percent.
But don’t freak out just yet. There are solutions here.
First, you can use Google’s UTM builder to make sure you are properly tagging your links. This means any and everything you have control over.
Manually tag them before they head out the door, or copy & paste into a lightweight app like Terminus.
If you’ve got long, cumbersome URL, you can be pretty sure that any traffic to that page didn’t come from Direct traffic.
People aren’t going to remember it. Which means they aren’t going to just spontaneously type it in.
Instead, these peeps probably came from another place, like an organic search or email.
However, in the same breath, you can probably consider homepage traffic to be legitimate Direct.
So create a segment based on these URLs and traffic sources to pinpoint “Dark Traffic” in its tracks. And prevent it from ruining your data in the future.
Lie #3. Top of the Funnel Performance = Results
Yes, we want traffic.
Yes, we want pageviews.
They make us feel all warm and fuzzy and proud. Like our hard work isn’t going unnoticed.
But they should not be the end-all, be-all.
Use them to see how you’re doing over last month. But don’t misunderstand numbers to be the Holy Grail, either.
Like this, for instance:
Looking at only this, you walk away feeling like a boss for all the numbers you’ve racked up. Seriously, I can’t even count that high.
But what about when you consider the bounce and exit rates for each of those pages? Are people staying? No? Color you embarrassed.
Are you still so excited by your thousands of pageviews if most of them left immediately?
Bounce rates are real. And you’ve gotta consider them when you are looking at your metrics.
They mean that people haven’t had the chance to interact with your soft micro conversions. They haven’t had a chance to activate.
So take a look at the big picture.
Are your blog posts and site pulling people in, but not making them stay?
This isn’t a horrible problem to have, because it’s a problem you can pinpoint.
The traffic is there. They just don’t really like what they are seeing once they get to your site. Which you can fix.
First, set up some events to get a better idea of what’s happening on your pages. Then, make sure you have actionable goals that will allow for movement you can track.
Or use the Kissmetrics’ Customer Engagement Automation tool to analyze what people are actually doing on your site and with your products. Then, you can interact with behavior-based messaging to keep them around longer. Or keep them coming back for more.
That way, you can increase conversions, engagement, and retention without the guesswork.
Just always remember that numbers don’t tell the whole story. Use them with a grain of salt and a little bit of context.
Lie #4. Deceptive A/B “Wins”
I’m just going to be honest with you. Those A/B testing “wins” you just got? Don’t always have the best track record.
I’m sorry to be so harsh right off the bat. Sometimes the truth hurts.
What’s even more worrisome? Oftentimes, tests will look like they have succeeded. But that’s not always the case (or at least, not the whole picture).
Start with Google Analytics content experiments, instead.
You can use it to contrast your varying pages to see if there are any sizeable adjustments that cause positive changes.
Instead, it allows you to compare different page variations to see which ‘bigger’ changes result in improvements. Maybe this works a little better because it adds an extra letter– it’s an A/B/N test.
The problem with this test is when you get a little too grab-happy.
You can quickly and easily remove fields to get better results, for instance. A simple reduction of three fields will increase your conversions by 11%.
Or, you can take away specific conversion-busters like the need to add a credit card for a non-paying trial. Sure, this will up your “conversions.”
But remember how far that got you a few lies ago?
That credit card field you took away? It was a huge indicator for which of your customers will eventually buy. 50% of people who put in their credit card will end up converting. While only 15% will of those who don’t enter a credit card will.
And we’re talkin’, conversions-conversions here. Like, bottom-of-the-funnel, paying customer conversions.
Context is key when you are looking at analytics.
Don’t test landing pages or simple changes to fields while only evaluating the top of the funnel. Make sure you dig in to see how the changes affect the rest of the customer experience and journey.
To do that, use the Funnel Report so you can see exactly how top-of-the-funnel changes are impacting bottom-of-the-funnel sales.
Lie #5. Your Channel Source Attribution
A Forrester Research study years ago found that 33% of all transactions of all transactions happened after new customers had gone through more than one touchpoint.
That number jumps to 48% when considering repeat customers.
The same report showed that paid search is the highest source of conversions.
Is it, though?
Or is it just the last point most commonly used before a sale?
Just because it’s the last one, doesn’t mean it’s the only one.
What other marketing tactics are working to increase growth? Forrester went on to declare that while email works for repeat conversions, social media brings in less than 1% of sales.
Ok. Then how do you explain SpearmintLOVE?
You know, the freaking baby blog that boosted their revenue by 991% in year using Facebook and Instagram.
The only reason I know about them? Because my wife has bought clothes from them. After discovering them on Facebook and Instagram.
One, simple Google graph puts this myth to bed. Fast.
If you look at the left side, or “assist interactions,” you’ll see that social channels will put new products in front of people.
As you move toward the middle, customers get more information about products and options using search. At the end, they’re on their way to the website.
Notice all the possible interaction options here. It’s not just the last-touch that brought the customer to the website. They can take many steps to get there.
Google Analytics has a few different attribution options built-in to help you change how conversions are assigned.
Image Source
These include:
Last Non-Direct Click: This will overlook Direct clicks and go to the channel used right before.
First Interaction: This uses the social or advertisement that got them to the website.
Linear: Here, each channel that a customer used before purchasing will get equal attribution.
Time Decay: This will consider the channel that was used immediately before conversion, rather than channels used in the past day/week/month.
Position: This model gives priority to the first and last channel used before conversion. Anything in the middle gets less attribution.
The depressing part, though?
There’s no right answer here. The attribution model you pick largely depends on your sales cycle, your customers, and even what specific objective you’re trying to figure out.
For example, if you’re spending a ton on ads, you might want to see how the First Interaction looks. Especially when using social ads that often bring people into your ecosystem for the very first time.
In other cases? It would be a terrible choice.
The trick is to know what you’re solving for, first. Then working backwards.
Conclusion
Data is important. It’s huge.
YOOGE.
But, be careful.
Google Analytics is a marvelous, cost effective, game-changing tool.
However, it’s been known to lie a little from time-to-time. (Yes, we’re still talking about Google Analytics here.)
Remember that conversion results aren’t always spot on. Direct traffic data might not be correct. Vanity metrics aren’t everything. A/B results can fire off false positives. And last touch isn’t everything.
Uncovering biases is never fun.
But it’s the key to creating campaigns that actually achieve results.
Without just blowing a lot of hot air.
About the Author: Brad Smith is the founder of Codeless, a B2B content creation company. Frequent contributor to Kissmetrics, Unbounce, WordStream, AdEspresso, Search Engine Journal, Autopilot, and more.
0 notes
alissaselezneva · 7 years
Text
5 Lies You Tell Yourself About Your Analytics (And How to Fix It)
Consulting data is good.
But being a slave to data, is not.
There is such a thing as being too data-obsessed. Confirmation bias pops up. And you miss the good, albeit, intangible stuff that comes along with your efforts.
The solution is to uncover those biases and misunderstandings that lead you astray.
It’s not easy. Or even intuitive. But it’s the only way to avoid these five analytics blinders.
Here’s how it strikes when you least expect it.
Here’s why you fall for it.
And here’s how to avoid it by bringing in other types of feedback and analysis.
Lie #1. Your “conversions” are flawless
You’ve got three AdWords campaigns.
The first brings in zero leads on $78 bucks spent.
The second brings in one at a cost of $135.31.
The third brings in two at $143.28 per lead.
Nine times out of ten, the campaign with more “conversions” is declared the winner.
But what do you really, truly, know about this scenario?
Which campaign is actually performing the best? Which is putting the most money back into your pocket?
There’s simply no way to tell at this point.
First and foremost, these “conversions” are leads — not closed customers.
Second, they might be for different products or services. So different average order values or LTVs come into play.
Third, this is nowhere close to statistical significance. For example, the third campaign has the most leads because you’ve spent the most money on it.
Not because it’s “better.”
What if you simply spend the same amount on the first two? What if you let them both get to around the same ~$150/per mark?
See what I mean?
Too many “what ifs” for my taste.
Yet this is exactly what happens inside any marketing department. The same end result pops up after each client or superior meeting.
Everyone points to the third campaign. It gets the adulation. It gets the increased budget. It gets the additional staff and resources.
So it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
One solution to figure all this out is closed loop analysis.
Ideally, your goal is to match up the customer’s information (name, email, phone, credit card) to the lead data you’re seeing inside Google Analytics.
Haha — just kidding.
That would mean you were gathering Personally Identifiable Information, which is a big no-no in Google Analytics.
Do it and they’ll delete your account right away.
The simplest alternative is to just use a tool that gives you this power, without jeopardizing your data. Hint, hint.
Lie #2. Your “top” traffic sources
What are your top sources of traffic?
A quick glance inside Google Analytics usually tells you (1) organic search and (2) direct. Maybe a little (3) referrals thrown in for good measure if you got some press last month.
Here’s the problem.
Two of those three are legit. The other is not.
The problem is that your direct traffic isn’t, in reality, all that “direct.”
Technically, this should be the number of people typing in your website URL to the address bar and hitting “Enter.”
Instead, it’s a healthy mix of email, social media, and good ol’ organic search.
The bigger the site, the bigger this problem usually is.
For example, The Atlantic couldn’t account for or explain how 25% of their visitors came to their site.
One of the biggest publishers in the world. One of the most respected. Who gets paid based on the number of visitors and page views they get. Has no idea how a quarter of their traffic is getting to their site.
That ain’t good.
But how can you really tell where people are coming from, if most analytics programs can’t tell you with any degree of accuracy?
For instance, let’s say your new, fantastic-looking email campaign is about to go out.
It’s been given the green light. “Legal” gives you the A-OK.
But wait! You didn’t tag the promo links correctly.
Now, you’ve spent all that time on a campaign that won’t have anything to show for it, because the traffic you get will now end up in the dumpster pile officially known as “Direct traffic.”
This isn’t just an email. It affects each and every social message, press mention, and blog post referral, too.
It can even affect your organic search traffic.
Groupon found this out the hard way. Literally. By completely de-indexing themselves for a few hours.
What did those crazy couponers find? That nearly 60% of their direct traffic was actually coming from organic search.
Sixty-freaking-percent.
But don’t freak out just yet. There are solutions here.
First, you can use Google’s UTM builder to make sure you are properly tagging your links. This means any and everything you have control over.
Manually tag them before they head out the door, or copy & paste into a lightweight app like Terminus.
If you’ve got long, cumbersome URL, you can be pretty sure that any traffic to that page didn’t come from Direct traffic.
People aren’t going to remember it. Which means they aren’t going to just spontaneously type it in.
Instead, these peeps probably came from another place, like an organic search or email.
However, in the same breath, you can probably consider homepage traffic to be legitimate Direct.
So create a segment based on these URLs and traffic sources to pinpoint “Dark Traffic” in its tracks. And prevent it from ruining your data in the future.
Lie #3. Top of the funnel performance = results
Yes, we want traffic.
Yes, we want pageviews.
They make us feel all warm and fuzzy and proud. Like our hard work isn’t going unnoticed.
But they should not be the end-all, be-all.
Use them to see how you’re doing over last month. But don’t misunderstand numbers to be the Holy Grail, either.
Like this, for instance:
Looking at only this, you walk away feeling like a boss for all the numbers you’ve racked up. Seriously, I can’t even count that high.
But what about when you consider the bounce and exit rates for each of those pages? Are people staying? No? Color you embarrassed.
Are you still so excited by your thousands of pageviews if most of them left immediately?
Bounce rates are real. And you’ve gotta consider them when you are looking at your metrics.
They mean that people haven’t had the chance to interact with your soft micro conversions. They haven’t had a chance to activate.
So take a look at the big picture.
Are your blog posts and site pulling people in, but not making them stay?
This isn’t a horrible problem to have, because it’s a problem you can pinpoint.
The traffic is there. They just don’t really like what they are seeing once they get to your site. Which you can fix.
First, set up some events to get a better idea of what’s happening on your pages. Then, make sure you have actionable goals that will allow for movement you can track.
Or use the Kissmetrics’ Customer Engagement Automation tool to analyze what people are actually doing on your site and with your products. Then, you can interact with behavior-based messaging to keep them around longer. Or keep them coming back for more.
That way, you can increase conversions, engagement, and retention without the guesswork.
Just always remember that numbers don’t tell the whole story. Use them with a grain of salt and a little bit of context.
Lie #4. Deceptive A/B “wins”
I’m just going to be honest with you. Those A/B testing “wins” you just got? Don’t always have the best track record.
I’m sorry to be so harsh right off the bat. Sometimes the truth hurts.
What’s even more worrisome? Oftentimes, tests will look like they have succeeded. But that’s not always the case (or at least, not the whole picture).
Start with Google Analytics content experiments, instead.
You can use it to contrast your varying pages to see if there are any sizeable adjustments that cause positive changes.
Instead, it allows you to compare different page variations to see which ‘bigger’ changes result in improvements. Maybe this works a little better because it adds an extra letter– it’s an A/B/N test.
The problem with this test is when you get a little too grab-happy.
You can quickly and easily remove fields to get better results, for instance. A simple reduction of three fields will increase your conversions by 11%.
Or, you can take away specific conversion-busters like the need to add a credit card for a non-paying trial. Sure, this will up your “conversions.”
But remember how far that got you a few lies ago?
That credit card field you took away? It was a huge indicator for which of your customers will eventually buy. 50% of people who put in their credit card will end up converting. While only 15% will of those who don’t enter a credit card will.
And we’re talkin’, conversions-conversions here. Like, bottom-of-the-funnel, paying customer conversions.
Context is key when you are looking at analytics.
Don’t test landing pages or simple changes to fields while only evaluating the top of the funnel. Make sure you dig in to see how the changes affect the rest of the customer experience and journey.
To do that, use the Funnel Report so you can see exactly how top-of-the-funnel changes are impacting bottom-of-the-funnel sales.
Lie #5. Your channel source attribution
A Forrester Research study years ago found that 33% of all transactions of all transactions happened after new customers had gone through more than one touchpoint.
That number jumps to 48% when considering repeat customers.
The same report showed that paid search is the highest source of conversions.
Is it, though?
Or is it just the last point most commonly used before a sale?
Just because it’s the last one, doesn’t mean it’s the only one.
What other marketing tactics are working to increase growth? Forrester went on to declare that while email works for repeat conversions, social media brings in less than 1% of sales.
Ok. Then how do you explain SpearmintLOVE?
You know, the freaking baby blog that boosted their revenue by 991% in year using Facebook and Instagram.
The only reason I know about them? Because my wife has bought clothes from them. After discovering them on Facebook and Instagram.
One, simple Google graph puts this myth to bed. Fast.
If you look at the left side, or “assist interactions,” you’ll see that social channels will put new products in front of people.
As you move toward the middle, customers get more information about products and options using search. At the end, they’re on their way to the website.
Notice all the possible interaction options here. It’s not just the last-touch that brought the customer to the website. They can take many steps to get there.
Google Analytics has a few different attribution options built-in to help you change how conversions are assigned.
Image Source
These include:
Last Non-Direct Click: This will overlook Direct clicks and go to the channel used right before.
First Interaction: This uses the social or advertisement that got them to the website.
Linear: Here, each channel that a customer used before purchasing will get equal attribution.
Time Decay: This will consider the channel that was used immediately before conversion, rather than channels used in the past day/week/month.
Position: This model gives priority to the first and last channel used before conversion. Anything in the middle gets less attribution.
The depressing part, though?
There’s no right answer here. The attribution model you pick largely depends on your sales cycle, your customers, and even what specific objective you’re trying to figure out.
For example, if you’re spending a ton on ads, you might want to see how the First Interaction looks. Especially when using social ads that often bring people into your ecosystem for the very first time.
In other cases? It would be a terrible choice.
The trick is to know what you’re solving for, first. Then working backwards.
Conclusion
Data is important. It’s huge.
YOOGE.
But, be careful.
Google Analytics is a marvelous, cost effective, game changing tool.
However, it’s been known to lie a little from time-to-time. (Yes, we’re still talking about Google Analytics here.)
Remember that conversion results aren’t always spot on. Direct traffic data might not be correct. Vanity metrics aren’t everything. A/B results can fire off false positives. And last touch isn’t everything.
Uncovering biases is never fun.
But it’s the key to creating campaigns that actually achieve results.
Without just blowing a lot of hot air.
About the Author: Brad Smith is the founder of Codeless, a B2B content creation company. Frequent contributor to Kissmetrics, Unbounce, WordStream, AdEspresso, Search Engine Journal, Autopilot, and more.
from WordPress https://reviewandbonuss.wordpress.com/2017/09/11/5-lies-you-tell-yourself-about-your-analytics-and-how-to-fix-it/
0 notes
seo78580 · 7 years
Text
5 Lies You Tell Yourself About Your Analytics (And How to Fix It)
Consulting data is good.
But being a slave to data, is not.
There is such a thing as being too data-obsessed. Confirmation bias pops up. And you miss the good, albeit, intangible stuff that comes along with your efforts.
The solution is to uncover those biases and misunderstandings that lead you astray.
It’s not easy. Or even intuitive. But it’s the only way to avoid these five analytics blinders.
Here’s how it strikes when you least expect it.
Here’s why you fall for it.
And here’s how to avoid it by bringing in other types of feedback and analysis.
Lie #1. Your “conversions” are flawless
You’ve got three AdWords campaigns.
The first brings in zero leads on $78 bucks spent.
The second brings in one at a cost of $135.31.
The third brings in two at $143.28 per lead.
Nine times out of ten, the campaign with more “conversions” is declared the winner.
But what do you really, truly, know about this scenario?
Which campaign is actually performing the best? Which is putting the most money back into your pocket?
There’s simply no way to tell at this point.
First and foremost, these “conversions” are leads — not closed customers.
Second, they might be for different products or services. So different average order values or LTVs come into play.
Third, this is nowhere close to statistical significance. For example, the third campaign has the most leads because you’ve spent the most money on it.
Not because it’s “better.”
What if you simply spend the same amount on the first two? What if you let them both get to around the same ~$150/per mark?
See what I mean?
Too many “what ifs” for my taste.
Yet this is exactly what happens inside any marketing department. The same end result pops up after each client or superior meeting.
Everyone points to the third campaign. It gets the adulation. It gets the increased budget. It gets the additional staff and resources.
So it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
One solution to figure all this out is closed loop analysis.
Ideally, your goal is to match up the customer’s information (name, email, phone, credit card) to the lead data you’re seeing inside Google Analytics.
Haha — just kidding.
That would mean you were gathering Personally Identifiable Information, which is a big no-no in Google Analytics.
Do it and they’ll delete your account right away.
The simplest alternative is to just use a tool that gives you this power, without jeopardizing your data. Hint, hint.
Lie #2. Your “top” traffic sources
What are your top sources of traffic?
A quick glance inside Google Analytics usually tells you (1) organic search and (2) direct. Maybe a little (3) referrals thrown in for good measure if you got some press last month.
Here’s the problem.
Two of those three are legit. The other is not.
The problem is that your direct traffic isn’t, in reality, all that “direct.”
Technically, this should be the number of people typing in your website URL to the address bar and hitting “Enter.”
Instead, it’s a healthy mix of email, social media, and good ol’ organic search.
The bigger the site, the bigger this problem usually is.
For example, The Atlantic couldn’t account for or explain how 25% of their visitors came to their site.
One of the biggest publishers in the world. One of the most respected. Who gets paid based on the number of visitors and page views they get. Has no idea how a quarter of their traffic is getting to their site.
That ain’t good.
But how can you really tell where people are coming from, if most analytics programs can’t tell you with any degree of accuracy?
For instance, let’s say your new, fantastic-looking is about to go out.
It’s been given the green light. “Legal” gives you the A-OK.
But wait! You didn’t tag the promo links correctly.
Now, you’ve spent all that time on a campaign that won’t have anything to show for it, because the traffic you get will now end up in the dumpster pile officially known as “Direct traffic.”
This isn’t just an email. It affects each and every social message, press mention, and blog post referral, too.
It can even affect your organic search traffic.
Groupon found this out the hard way. Literally. By completely de-indexing themselves for a few hours.
What did those crazy couponers find? That nearly 60% of their direct traffic was actually coming from organic search.
Sixty-freaking-percent.
But don’t freak out just yet. There are solutions here.
First, you can use Google’s UTM builder to make sure you are properly tagging your links. This means any and everything you have control over.
Manually tag them before they head out the door, or copy & paste into a lightweight app like Terminus.
If you’ve got long, cumbersome URL, you can be pretty sure that any traffic to that page didn’t come from Direct traffic.
People aren’t going to remember it. Which means they aren’t going to just spontaneously type it in.
Instead, these peeps probably came from another place, like an organic search or email.
However, in the same breath, you can probably consider homepage traffic to be legitimate Direct.
So create a segment based on these URLs and traffic sources to pinpoint “Dark Traffic” in its tracks. And prevent it from ruining your data in the future.
Lie #3. Top of the funnel performance = results
Yes, we want traffic.
Yes, we want pageviews.
They make us feel all warm and fuzzy and proud. Like our hard work isn’t going unnoticed.
But they should not be the end-all, be-all.
Use them to see how you’re doing over last month. But don’t misunderstand numbers to be the Holy Grail, either.
Like this, for instance:
Looking at only this, you walk away feeling like a boss for all the numbers you’ve racked up. Seriously, I can’t even count that high.
But what about when you consider the bounce and exit rates for each of those pages? Are people staying? No? Color you embarrassed.
Are you still so excited by your thousands of pageviews if most of them left immediately?
Bounce rates are real. And you’ve gotta consider them when you are looking at your metrics.
They mean that people haven’t had the chance to interact with your soft micro conversions. They haven’t had a chance to activate.
So take a look at the big picture.
Are your blog posts and site pulling people in, but not making them stay?
This isn’t a horrible problem to have, because it’s a problem you can pinpoint.
The traffic is there. They just don’t really like what they are seeing once they get to your site. Which you can fix.
First, set up some events to get a better idea of what’s happening on your pages. Then, make sure you have actionable goals that will allow for movement you can track.
Or use the Kissmetrics’ Customer Engagement Automation tool to analyze what people are actually doing on your site and with your products. Then, you can interact with behavior-based messaging to keep them around longer. Or keep them coming back for more.
That way, you can increase conversions, engagement, and retention without the guesswork.
Just always remember that numbers don’t tell the whole story. Use them with a grain of salt and a little bit of context.
Lie #4. Deceptive A/B “wins”
I’m just going to be honest with you. Those A/B testing “wins” you just got? Don’t always have the best track record.
I’m sorry to be so harsh right off the bat. Sometimes the truth hurts.
What’s even more worrisome? Oftentimes, tests will look like they have succeeded. But that’s not always the case (or at least, not the whole picture).
Start with Google Analytics content experiments, instead.
You can use it to contrast your varying pages to see if there are any sizeable adjustments that cause positive changes.
Instead, it allows you to compare different page variations to see which ‘bigger’ changes result in improvements. Maybe this works a little better because it adds an extra letter– it’s an A/B/N test.
The problem with this test is when you get a little too grab-happy.
You can quickly and easily remove fields to get better results, for instance. A simple reduction of three fields will increase your conversions by 11%.
Or, you can take away specific conversion-busters like the need to add a credit card for a non-paying trial. Sure, this will up your “conversions.”
But remember how far that got you a few lies ago?
That credit card field you took away? It was a huge indicator for which of your customers will eventually buy. 50% of people who put in their credit card will end up converting. While only 15% will of those who don’t enter a credit card will.
And we’re talkin’, conversions-conversions here. Like, bottom-of-the-funnel, paying customer conversions.
Context is key when you are looking at analytics.
Don’t test landing pages or simple changes to fields while only evaluating the top of the funnel. Make sure you dig in to see how the changes affect the rest of the customer experience and journey.
To do that, use the Funnel Report so you can see exactly how top-of-the-funnel changes are impacting bottom-of-the-funnel sales.
Lie #5. Your channel source attribution
A Forrester Research study years ago found that 33% of all transactions of all transactions happened after new customers had gone through more than one touchpoint.
That number jumps to 48% when considering repeat customers.
The same report showed that paid search is the highest source of conversions.
Is it, though?
Or is it just the last point most commonly used before a sale?
Just because it’s the last one, doesn’t mean it’s the only one.
What other marketing tactics are working to increase growth? Forrester went on to declare that while email works for repeat conversions, social media brings in less than 1% of sales.
Ok. Then how do you explain SpearmintLOVE?
You know, the freaking baby blog that boosted their revenue by 991% in year using Facebook and Instagram.
The only reason I know about them? Because my wife has bought clothes from them. After discovering them on Facebook and Instagram.
One, simple Google graph puts this myth to bed. Fast.
If you look at the left side, or “assist interactions,” you’ll see that social channels will put new products in front of people.
As you move toward the middle, customers get more information about products and options using search. At the end, they’re on their way to the website.
Notice all the possible interaction options here. It’s not just the last-touch that brought the customer to the website. They can take many steps to get there.
Google Analytics has a few different attribution options built-in to help you change how conversions are assigned.
Image Source
These include:
Last Non-Direct Click: This will overlook Direct clicks and go to the channel used right before.
First Interaction: This uses the social or advertisement that got them to the website.
Linear: Here, each channel that a customer used before purchasing will get equal attribution.
Time Decay: This will consider the channel that was used immediately before conversion, rather than channels used in the past day/week/month.
Position: This model gives priority to the first and last channel used before conversion. Anything in the middle gets less attribution.
The depressing part, though?
There’s no right answer here. The attribution model you pick largely depends on your sales cycle, your customers, and even what specific objective you’re trying to figure out.
For example, if you’re spending a ton on ads, you might want to see how the First Interaction looks. Especially when using social ads that often bring people into your ecosystem for the very first time.
In other cases? It would be a terrible choice.
The trick is to know what you’re solving for, first. Then working backwards.
Conclusion
Data is important. It’s huge.
YOOGE.
But, be careful.
Google Analytics is a marvelous, cost effective, game changing tool.
However, it’s been known to lie a little from time-to-time. (Yes, we’re still talking about Google Analytics here.)
Remember that conversion results aren’t always spot on. Direct traffic data might not be correct. Vanity metrics aren’t everything. A/B results can fire off false positives. And last touch isn’t everything.
Uncovering biases is never fun.
But it’s the key to creating campaigns that actually achieve results.
Without just blowing a lot of hot air.
About the Author: Brad Smith is the founder of Codeless, a B2B content creation company. Frequent contributor to Kissmetrics, Unbounce, WordStream, AdEspresso, Search Engine Journal, Autopilot, and more.
from DIYS http://ift.tt/2wkTx6Q
0 notes
reviewandbonuss · 7 years
Text
5 Lies You Tell Yourself About Your Analytics (And How to Fix It)
Consulting data is good.
But being a slave to data, is not.
There is such a thing as being too data-obsessed. Confirmation bias pops up. And you miss the good, albeit, intangible stuff that comes along with your efforts.
The solution is to uncover those biases and misunderstandings that lead you astray.
It’s not easy. Or even intuitive. But it’s the only way to avoid these five analytics blinders.
Here’s how it strikes when you least expect it.
Here’s why you fall for it.
And here’s how to avoid it by bringing in other types of feedback and analysis.
Lie #1. Your “conversions” are flawless
You’ve got three AdWords campaigns.
The first brings in zero leads on $78 bucks spent.
The second brings in one at a cost of $135.31.
The third brings in two at $143.28 per lead.
Nine times out of ten, the campaign with more “conversions” is declared the winner.
But what do you really, truly, know about this scenario?
Which campaign is actually performing the best? Which is putting the most money back into your pocket?
There’s simply no way to tell at this point.
First and foremost, these “conversions” are leads — not closed customers.
Second, they might be for different products or services. So different average order values or LTVs come into play.
Third, this is nowhere close to statistical significance. For example, the third campaign has the most leads because you’ve spent the most money on it.
Not because it’s “better.”
What if you simply spend the same amount on the first two? What if you let them both get to around the same ~$150/per mark?
See what I mean?
Too many “what ifs” for my taste.
Yet this is exactly what happens inside any marketing department. The same end result pops up after each client or superior meeting.
Everyone points to the third campaign. It gets the adulation. It gets the increased budget. It gets the additional staff and resources.
So it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
One solution to figure all this out is closed loop analysis.
Ideally, your goal is to match up the customer’s information (name, email, phone, credit card) to the lead data you’re seeing inside Google Analytics.
Haha — just kidding.
That would mean you were gathering Personally Identifiable Information, which is a big no-no in Google Analytics.
Do it and they’ll delete your account right away.
The simplest alternative is to just use a tool that gives you this power, without jeopardizing your data. Hint, hint.
Lie #2. Your “top” traffic sources
What are your top sources of traffic?
A quick glance inside Google Analytics usually tells you (1) organic search and (2) direct. Maybe a little (3) referrals thrown in for good measure if you got some press last month.
Here’s the problem.
Two of those three are legit. The other is not.
The problem is that your direct traffic isn’t, in reality, all that “direct.”
Technically, this should be the number of people typing in your website URL to the address bar and hitting “Enter.”
Instead, it’s a healthy mix of email, social media, and good ol’ organic search.
The bigger the site, the bigger this problem usually is.
For example, The Atlantic couldn’t account for or explain how 25% of their visitors came to their site.
One of the biggest publishers in the world. One of the most respected. Who gets paid based on the number of visitors and page views they get. Has no idea how a quarter of their traffic is getting to their site.
That ain’t good.
But how can you really tell where people are coming from, if most analytics programs can’t tell you with any degree of accuracy?
For instance, let’s say your new, fantastic-looking email campaign is about to go out.
It’s been given the green light. “Legal” gives you the A-OK.
But wait! You didn’t tag the promo links correctly.
Now, you’ve spent all that time on a campaign that won’t have anything to show for it, because the traffic you get will now end up in the dumpster pile officially known as “Direct traffic.”
This isn’t just an email. It affects each and every social message, press mention, and blog post referral, too.
It can even affect your organic search traffic.
Groupon found this out the hard way. Literally. By completely de-indexing themselves for a few hours.
What did those crazy couponers find? That nearly 60% of their direct traffic was actually coming from organic search.
Sixty-freaking-percent.
But don’t freak out just yet. There are solutions here.
First, you can use Google’s UTM builder to make sure you are properly tagging your links. This means any and everything you have control over.
Manually tag them before they head out the door, or copy & paste into a lightweight app like Terminus.
If you’ve got long, cumbersome URL, you can be pretty sure that any traffic to that page didn’t come from Direct traffic.
People aren’t going to remember it. Which means they aren’t going to just spontaneously type it in.
Instead, these peeps probably came from another place, like an organic search or email.
However, in the same breath, you can probably consider homepage traffic to be legitimate Direct.
So create a segment based on these URLs and traffic sources to pinpoint “Dark Traffic” in its tracks. And prevent it from ruining your data in the future.
Lie #3. Top of the funnel performance = results
Yes, we want traffic.
Yes, we want pageviews.
They make us feel all warm and fuzzy and proud. Like our hard work isn’t going unnoticed.
But they should not be the end-all, be-all.
Use them to see how you’re doing over last month. But don’t misunderstand numbers to be the Holy Grail, either.
Like this, for instance:
Looking at only this, you walk away feeling like a boss for all the numbers you’ve racked up. Seriously, I can’t even count that high.
But what about when you consider the bounce and exit rates for each of those pages? Are people staying? No? Color you embarrassed.
Are you still so excited by your thousands of pageviews if most of them left immediately?
Bounce rates are real. And you’ve gotta consider them when you are looking at your metrics.
They mean that people haven’t had the chance to interact with your soft micro conversions. They haven’t had a chance to activate.
So take a look at the big picture.
Are your blog posts and site pulling people in, but not making them stay?
This isn’t a horrible problem to have, because it’s a problem you can pinpoint.
The traffic is there. They just don’t really like what they are seeing once they get to your site. Which you can fix.
First, set up some events to get a better idea of what’s happening on your pages. Then, make sure you have actionable goals that will allow for movement you can track.
Or use the Kissmetrics’ Customer Engagement Automation tool to analyze what people are actually doing on your site and with your products. Then, you can interact with behavior-based messaging to keep them around longer. Or keep them coming back for more.
That way, you can increase conversions, engagement, and retention without the guesswork.
Just always remember that numbers don’t tell the whole story. Use them with a grain of salt and a little bit of context.
Lie #4. Deceptive A/B “wins”
I’m just going to be honest with you. Those A/B testing “wins” you just got? Don’t always have the best track record.
I’m sorry to be so harsh right off the bat. Sometimes the truth hurts.
What’s even more worrisome? Oftentimes, tests will look like they have succeeded. But that’s not always the case (or at least, not the whole picture).
Start with Google Analytics content experiments, instead.
You can use it to contrast your varying pages to see if there are any sizeable adjustments that cause positive changes.
Instead, it allows you to compare different page variations to see which ‘bigger’ changes result in improvements. Maybe this works a little better because it adds an extra letter– it’s an A/B/N test.
The problem with this test is when you get a little too grab-happy.
You can quickly and easily remove fields to get better results, for instance. A simple reduction of three fields will increase your conversions by 11%.
Or, you can take away specific conversion-busters like the need to add a credit card for a non-paying trial. Sure, this will up your “conversions.”
But remember how far that got you a few lies ago?
That credit card field you took away? It was a huge indicator for which of your customers will eventually buy. 50% of people who put in their credit card will end up converting. While only 15% will of those who don’t enter a credit card will.
And we’re talkin’, conversions-conversions here. Like, bottom-of-the-funnel, paying customer conversions.
Context is key when you are looking at analytics.
Don’t test landing pages or simple changes to fields while only evaluating the top of the funnel. Make sure you dig in to see how the changes affect the rest of the customer experience and journey.
To do that, use the Funnel Report so you can see exactly how top-of-the-funnel changes are impacting bottom-of-the-funnel sales.
Lie #5. Your channel source attribution
A Forrester Research study years ago found that 33% of all transactions of all transactions happened after new customers had gone through more than one touchpoint.
That number jumps to 48% when considering repeat customers.
The same report showed that paid search is the highest source of conversions.
Is it, though?
Or is it just the last point most commonly used before a sale?
Just because it’s the last one, doesn’t mean it’s the only one.
What other marketing tactics are working to increase growth? Forrester went on to declare that while email works for repeat conversions, social media brings in less than 1% of sales.
Ok. Then how do you explain SpearmintLOVE?
You know, the freaking baby blog that boosted their revenue by 991% in year using Facebook and Instagram.
The only reason I know about them? Because my wife has bought clothes from them. After discovering them on Facebook and Instagram.
One, simple Google graph puts this myth to bed. Fast.
If you look at the left side, or “assist interactions,” you’ll see that social channels will put new products in front of people.
As you move toward the middle, customers get more information about products and options using search. At the end, they’re on their way to the website.
Notice all the possible interaction options here. It’s not just the last-touch that brought the customer to the website. They can take many steps to get there.
Google Analytics has a few different attribution options built-in to help you change how conversions are assigned.
Image Source
These include:
Last Non-Direct Click: This will overlook Direct clicks and go to the channel used right before.
First Interaction: This uses the social or advertisement that got them to the website.
Linear: Here, each channel that a customer used before purchasing will get equal attribution.
Time Decay: This will consider the channel that was used immediately before conversion, rather than channels used in the past day/week/month.
Position: This model gives priority to the first and last channel used before conversion. Anything in the middle gets less attribution.
The depressing part, though?
There’s no right answer here. The attribution model you pick largely depends on your sales cycle, your customers, and even what specific objective you’re trying to figure out.
For example, if you’re spending a ton on ads, you might want to see how the First Interaction looks. Especially when using social ads that often bring people into your ecosystem for the very first time.
In other cases? It would be a terrible choice.
The trick is to know what you’re solving for, first. Then working backwards.
Conclusion
Data is important. It’s huge.
YOOGE.
But, be careful.
Google Analytics is a marvelous, cost effective, game changing tool.
However, it’s been known to lie a little from time-to-time. (Yes, we’re still talking about Google Analytics here.)
Remember that conversion results aren’t always spot on. Direct traffic data might not be correct. Vanity metrics aren’t everything. A/B results can fire off false positives. And last touch isn’t everything.
Uncovering biases is never fun.
But it’s the key to creating campaigns that actually achieve results.
Without just blowing a lot of hot air.
About the Author: Brad Smith is the founder of Codeless, a B2B content creation company. Frequent contributor to Kissmetrics, Unbounce, WordStream, AdEspresso, Search Engine Journal, Autopilot, and more.
0 notes
filipeteimuraz · 7 years
Text
5 Lies You Tell Yourself About Your Analytics (And How to Fix It)
Consulting data is good.
But being a slave to data, is not.
There is such a thing as being too data-obsessed. Confirmation bias pops up. And you miss the good, albeit, intangible stuff that comes along with your efforts.
The solution is to uncover those biases and misunderstandings that lead you astray.
It’s not easy. Or even intuitive. But it’s the only way to avoid these five analytics blinders.
Here’s how it strikes when you least expect it.
Here’s why you fall for it.
And here’s how to avoid it by bringing in other types of feedback and analysis.
Lie #1. Your “conversions” are flawless
You’ve got three AdWords campaigns.
The first brings in zero leads on $78 bucks spent.
The second brings in one at a cost of $135.31.
The third brings in two at $143.28 per lead.
Nine times out of ten, the campaign with more “conversions” is declared the winner.
But what do you really, truly, know about this scenario?
Which campaign is actually performing the best? Which is putting the most money back into your pocket?
There’s simply no way to tell at this point.
First and foremost, these “conversions” are leads — not closed customers.
Second, they might be for different products or services. So different average order values or LTVs come into play.
Third, this is nowhere close to statistical significance. For example, the third campaign has the most leads because you’ve spent the most money on it.
Not because it’s “better.”
What if you simply spend the same amount on the first two? What if you let them both get to around the same ~$150/per mark?
See what I mean?
Too many “what ifs” for my taste.
Yet this is exactly what happens inside any marketing department. The same end result pops up after each client or superior meeting.
Everyone points to the third campaign. It gets the adulation. It gets the increased budget. It gets the additional staff and resources.
So it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
One solution to figure all this out is closed loop analysis.
Ideally, your goal is to match up the customer’s information (name, email, phone, credit card) to the lead data you’re seeing inside Google Analytics.
Haha — just kidding.
That would mean you were gathering Personally Identifiable Information, which is a big no-no in Google Analytics.
Do it and they’ll delete your account right away.
The simplest alternative is to just use a tool that gives you this power, without jeopardizing your data. Hint, hint.
Lie #2. Your “top” traffic sources
What are your top sources of traffic?
A quick glance inside Google Analytics usually tells you (1) organic search and (2) direct. Maybe a little (3) referrals thrown in for good measure if you got some press last month.
Here’s the problem.
Two of those three are legit. The other is not.
The problem is that your direct traffic isn’t, in reality, all that “direct.”
Technically, this should be the number of people typing in your website URL to the address bar and hitting “Enter.”
Instead, it’s a healthy mix of email, social media, and good ol’ organic search.
The bigger the site, the bigger this problem usually is.
For example, The Atlantic couldn’t account for or explain how 25% of their visitors came to their site.
One of the biggest publishers in the world. One of the most respected. Who gets paid based on the number of visitors and page views they get. Has no idea how a quarter of their traffic is getting to their site.
That ain’t good.
But how can you really tell where people are coming from, if most analytics programs can’t tell you with any degree of accuracy?
For instance, let’s say your new, fantastic-looking email campaign is about to go out.
It’s been given the green light. “Legal” gives you the A-OK.
But wait! You didn’t tag the promo links correctly.
Now, you’ve spent all that time on a campaign that won’t have anything to show for it, because the traffic you get will now end up in the dumpster pile officially known as “Direct traffic.”
This isn’t just an email. It affects each and every social message, press mention, and blog post referral, too.
It can even affect your organic search traffic.
Groupon found this out the hard way. Literally. By completely de-indexing themselves for a few hours.
What did those crazy couponers find? That nearly 60% of their direct traffic was actually coming from organic search.
Sixty-freaking-percent.
But don’t freak out just yet. There are solutions here.
First, you can use Google’s UTM builder to make sure you are properly tagging your links. This means any and everything you have control over.
Manually tag them before they head out the door, or copy & paste into a lightweight app like Terminus.
If you’ve got long, cumbersome URL, you can be pretty sure that any traffic to that page didn’t come from Direct traffic.
People aren’t going to remember it. Which means they aren’t going to just spontaneously type it in.
Instead, these peeps probably came from another place, like an organic search or email.
However, in the same breath, you can probably consider homepage traffic to be legitimate Direct.
So create a segment based on these URLs and traffic sources to pinpoint “Dark Traffic” in its tracks. And prevent it from ruining your data in the future.
Lie #3. Top of the funnel performance = results
Yes, we want traffic.
Yes, we want pageviews.
They make us feel all warm and fuzzy and proud. Like our hard work isn’t going unnoticed.
But they should not be the end-all, be-all.
Use them to see how you’re doing over last month. But don’t misunderstand numbers to be the Holy Grail, either.
Like this, for instance:
Looking at only this, you walk away feeling like a boss for all the numbers you’ve racked up. Seriously, I can’t even count that high.
But what about when you consider the bounce and exit rates for each of those pages? Are people staying? No? Color you embarrassed.
Are you still so excited by your thousands of pageviews if most of them left immediately?
Bounce rates are real. And you’ve gotta consider them when you are looking at your metrics.
They mean that people haven’t had the chance to interact with your soft micro conversions. They haven’t had a chance to activate.
So take a look at the big picture.
Are your blog posts and site pulling people in, but not making them stay?
This isn’t a horrible problem to have, because it’s a problem you can pinpoint.
The traffic is there. They just don’t really like what they are seeing once they get to your site. Which you can fix.
First, set up some events to get a better idea of what’s happening on your pages. Then, make sure you have actionable goals that will allow for movement you can track.
Or use the Kissmetrics’ Customer Engagement Automation tool to analyze what people are actually doing on your site and with your products. Then, you can interact with behavior-based messaging to keep them around longer. Or keep them coming back for more.
That way, you can increase conversions, engagement, and retention without the guesswork.
Just always remember that numbers don’t tell the whole story. Use them with a grain of salt and a little bit of context.
Lie #4. Deceptive A/B “wins”
I’m just going to be honest with you. Those A/B testing “wins” you just got? Don’t always have the best track record.
I’m sorry to be so harsh right off the bat. Sometimes the truth hurts.
What’s even more worrisome? Oftentimes, tests will look like they have succeeded. But that’s not always the case (or at least, not the whole picture).
Start with Google Analytics content experiments, instead.
You can use it to contrast your varying pages to see if there are any sizeable adjustments that cause positive changes.
Instead, it allows you to compare different page variations to see which ‘bigger’ changes result in improvements. Maybe this works a little better because it adds an extra letter– it’s an A/B/N test.
The problem with this test is when you get a little too grab-happy.
You can quickly and easily remove fields to get better results, for instance. A simple reduction of three fields will increase your conversions by 11%.
Or, you can take away specific conversion-busters like the need to add a credit card for a non-paying trial. Sure, this will up your “conversions.”
But remember how far that got you a few lies ago?
That credit card field you took away? It was a huge indicator for which of your customers will eventually buy. 50% of people who put in their credit card will end up converting. While only 15% will of those who don’t enter a credit card will.
And we’re talkin’, conversions-conversions here. Like, bottom-of-the-funnel, paying customer conversions.
Context is key when you are looking at analytics.
Don’t test landing pages or simple changes to fields while only evaluating the top of the funnel. Make sure you dig in to see how the changes affect the rest of the customer experience and journey.
To do that, use the Funnel Report so you can see exactly how top-of-the-funnel changes are impacting bottom-of-the-funnel sales.
Lie #5. Your channel source attribution
A Forrester Research study years ago found that 33% of all transactions of all transactions happened after new customers had gone through more than one touchpoint.
That number jumps to 48% when considering repeat customers.
The same report showed that paid search is the highest source of conversions.
Is it, though?
Or is it just the last point most commonly used before a sale?
Just because it’s the last one, doesn’t mean it’s the only one.
What other marketing tactics are working to increase growth? Forrester went on to declare that while email works for repeat conversions, social media brings in less than 1% of sales.
Ok. Then how do you explain SpearmintLOVE?
You know, the freaking baby blog that boosted their revenue by 991% in year using Facebook and Instagram.
The only reason I know about them? Because my wife has bought clothes from them. After discovering them on Facebook and Instagram.
One, simple Google graph puts this myth to bed. Fast.
If you look at the left side, or “assist interactions,” you’ll see that social channels will put new products in front of people.
As you move toward the middle, customers get more information about products and options using search. At the end, they’re on their way to the website.
Notice all the possible interaction options here. It’s not just the last-touch that brought the customer to the website. They can take many steps to get there.
Google Analytics has a few different attribution options built-in to help you change how conversions are assigned.
Image Source
These include:
Last Non-Direct Click: This will overlook Direct clicks and go to the channel used right before.
First Interaction: This uses the social or advertisement that got them to the website.
Linear: Here, each channel that a customer used before purchasing will get equal attribution.
Time Decay: This will consider the channel that was used immediately before conversion, rather than channels used in the past day/week/month.
Position: This model gives priority to the first and last channel used before conversion. Anything in the middle gets less attribution.
The depressing part, though?
There’s no right answer here. The attribution model you pick largely depends on your sales cycle, your customers, and even what specific objective you’re trying to figure out.
For example, if you’re spending a ton on ads, you might want to see how the First Interaction looks. Especially when using social ads that often bring people into your ecosystem for the very first time.
In other cases? It would be a terrible choice.
The trick is to know what you’re solving for, first. Then working backwards.
Conclusion
Data is important. It’s huge.
YOOGE.
But, be careful.
Google Analytics is a marvelous, cost effective, game changing tool.
However, it’s been known to lie a little from time-to-time. (Yes, we’re still talking about Google Analytics here.)
Remember that conversion results aren’t always spot on. Direct traffic data might not be correct. Vanity metrics aren’t everything. A/B results can fire off false positives. And last touch isn’t everything.
Uncovering biases is never fun.
But it’s the key to creating campaigns that actually achieve results.
Without just blowing a lot of hot air.
About the Author: Brad Smith is the founder of Codeless, a B2B content creation company. Frequent contributor to Kissmetrics, Unbounce, WordStream, AdEspresso, Search Engine Journal, Autopilot, and more.
Read more here - http://review-and-bonuss.blogspot.com/2017/09/5-lies-you-tell-yourself-about-your.html
0 notes
ericsburden-blog · 7 years
Text
5 Lies You Tell Yourself About Your Analytics (And How to Fix It)
Consulting data is good.
But being a slave to data, is not.
There is such a thing as being too data-obsessed. Confirmation bias pops up. And you miss the good, albeit, intangible stuff that comes along with your efforts.
The solution is to uncover those biases and misunderstandings that lead you astray.
It’s not easy. Or even intuitive. But it’s the only way to avoid these five analytics blinders.
Here’s how it strikes when you least expect it.
Here’s why you fall for it.
And here’s how to avoid it by bringing in other types of feedback and analysis.
Lie #1. Your “conversions” are flawless
You’ve got three AdWords campaigns.
The first brings in zero leads on $78 bucks spent.
The second brings in one at a cost of $135.31.
The third brings in two at $143.28 per lead.
Nine times out of ten, the campaign with more “conversions” is declared the winner.
But what do you really, truly, know about this scenario?
Which campaign is actually performing the best? Which is putting the most money back into your pocket?
There’s simply no way to tell at this point.
First and foremost, these “conversions” are leads — not closed customers.
Second, they might be for different products or services. So different average order values or LTVs come into play.
Third, this is nowhere close to statistical significance. For example, the third campaign has the most leads because you’ve spent the most money on it.
Not because it’s “better.”
What if you simply spend the same amount on the first two? What if you let them both get to around the same ~$150/per mark?
See what I mean?
Too many “what ifs” for my taste.
Yet this is exactly what happens inside any marketing department. The same end result pops up after each client or superior meeting.
Everyone points to the third campaign. It gets the adulation. It gets the increased budget. It gets the additional staff and resources.
So it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
One solution to figure all this out is closed loop analysis.
Ideally, your goal is to match up the customer’s information (name, email, phone, credit card) to the lead data you’re seeing inside Google Analytics.
Haha — just kidding.
That would mean you were gathering Personally Identifiable Information, which is a big no-no in Google Analytics.
Do it and they’ll delete your account right away.
The simplest alternative is to just use a tool that gives you this power, without jeopardizing your data. Hint, hint.
Lie #2. Your “top” traffic sources
What are your top sources of traffic?
A quick glance inside Google Analytics usually tells you (1) organic search and (2) direct. Maybe a little (3) referrals thrown in for good measure if you got some press last month.
Here’s the problem.
Two of those three are legit. The other is not.
The problem is that your direct traffic isn’t, in reality, all that “direct.”
Technically, this should be the number of people typing in your website URL to the address bar and hitting “Enter.”
Instead, it’s a healthy mix of email, social media, and good ol’ organic search.
The bigger the site, the bigger this problem usually is.
For example, The Atlantic couldn’t account for or explain how 25% of their visitors came to their site.
One of the biggest publishers in the world. One of the most respected. Who gets paid based on the number of visitors and page views they get. Has no idea how a quarter of their traffic is getting to their site.
That ain’t good.
But how can you really tell where people are coming from, if most analytics programs can’t tell you with any degree of accuracy?
For instance, let’s say your new, fantastic-looking email campaign is about to go out.
It’s been given the green light. “Legal” gives you the A-OK.
But wait! You didn’t tag the promo links correctly.
Now, you’ve spent all that time on a campaign that won’t have anything to show for it, because the traffic you get will now end up in the dumpster pile officially known as “Direct traffic.”
This isn’t just an email. It affects each and every social message, press mention, and blog post referral, too.
It can even affect your organic search traffic.
Groupon found this out the hard way. Literally. By completely de-indexing themselves for a few hours.
What did those crazy couponers find? That nearly 60% of their direct traffic was actually coming from organic search.
Sixty-freaking-percent.
But don’t freak out just yet. There are solutions here.
First, you can use Google’s UTM builder to make sure you are properly tagging your links. This means any and everything you have control over.
Manually tag them before they head out the door, or copy & paste into a lightweight app like Terminus.
If you’ve got long, cumbersome URL, you can be pretty sure that any traffic to that page didn’t come from Direct traffic.
People aren’t going to remember it. Which means they aren’t going to just spontaneously type it in.
Instead, these peeps probably came from another place, like an organic search or email.
However, in the same breath, you can probably consider homepage traffic to be legitimate Direct.
So create a segment based on these URLs and traffic sources to pinpoint “Dark Traffic” in its tracks. And prevent it from ruining your data in the future.
Lie #3. Top of the funnel performance = results
Yes, we want traffic.
Yes, we want pageviews.
They make us feel all warm and fuzzy and proud. Like our hard work isn’t going unnoticed.
But they should not be the end-all, be-all.
Use them to see how you’re doing over last month. But don’t misunderstand numbers to be the Holy Grail, either.
Like this, for instance:
Looking at only this, you walk away feeling like a boss for all the numbers you’ve racked up. Seriously, I can’t even count that high.
But what about when you consider the bounce and exit rates for each of those pages? Are people staying? No? Color you embarrassed.
Are you still so excited by your thousands of pageviews if most of them left immediately?
Bounce rates are real. And you’ve gotta consider them when you are looking at your metrics.
They mean that people haven’t had the chance to interact with your soft micro conversions. They haven’t had a chance to activate.
So take a look at the big picture.
Are your blog posts and site pulling people in, but not making them stay?
This isn’t a horrible problem to have, because it’s a problem you can pinpoint.
The traffic is there. They just don’t really like what they are seeing once they get to your site. Which you can fix.
First, set up some events to get a better idea of what’s happening on your pages. Then, make sure you have actionable goals that will allow for movement you can track.
Or use the Kissmetrics’ Customer Engagement Automation tool to analyze what people are actually doing on your site and with your products. Then, you can interact with behavior-based messaging to keep them around longer. Or keep them coming back for more.
That way, you can increase conversions, engagement, and retention without the guesswork.
Just always remember that numbers don’t tell the whole story. Use them with a grain of salt and a little bit of context.
Lie #4. Deceptive A/B “wins”
I’m just going to be honest with you. Those A/B testing “wins” you just got? Don’t always have the best track record.
I’m sorry to be so harsh right off the bat. Sometimes the truth hurts.
What’s even more worrisome? Oftentimes, tests will look like they have succeeded. But that’s not always the case (or at least, not the whole picture).
Start with Google Analytics content experiments, instead.
You can use it to contrast your varying pages to see if there are any sizeable adjustments that cause positive changes.
Instead, it allows you to compare different page variations to see which ‘bigger’ changes result in improvements. Maybe this works a little better because it adds an extra letter– it’s an A/B/N test.
The problem with this test is when you get a little too grab-happy.
You can quickly and easily remove fields to get better results, for instance. A simple reduction of three fields will increase your conversions by 11%.
Or, you can take away specific conversion-busters like the need to add a credit card for a non-paying trial. Sure, this will up your “conversions.”
But remember how far that got you a few lies ago?
That credit card field you took away? It was a huge indicator for which of your customers will eventually buy. 50% of people who put in their credit card will end up converting. While only 15% will of those who don’t enter a credit card will.
And we’re talkin’, conversions-conversions here. Like, bottom-of-the-funnel, paying customer conversions.
Context is key when you are looking at analytics.
Don’t test landing pages or simple changes to fields while only evaluating the top of the funnel. Make sure you dig in to see how the changes affect the rest of the customer experience and journey.
To do that, use the Funnel Report so you can see exactly how top-of-the-funnel changes are impacting bottom-of-the-funnel sales.
Lie #5. Your channel source attribution
A Forrester Research study years ago found that 33% of all transactions of all transactions happened after new customers had gone through more than one touchpoint.
That number jumps to 48% when considering repeat customers.
The same report showed that paid search is the highest source of conversions.
Is it, though?
Or is it just the last point most commonly used before a sale?
Just because it’s the last one, doesn’t mean it’s the only one.
What other marketing tactics are working to increase growth? Forrester went on to declare that while email works for repeat conversions, social media brings in less than 1% of sales.
Ok. Then how do you explain SpearmintLOVE?
You know, the freaking baby blog that boosted their revenue by 991% in year using Facebook and Instagram.
The only reason I know about them? Because my wife has bought clothes from them. After discovering them on Facebook and Instagram.
One, simple Google graph puts this myth to bed. Fast.
If you look at the left side, or “assist interactions,” you’ll see that social channels will put new products in front of people.
As you move toward the middle, customers get more information about products and options using search. At the end, they’re on their way to the website.
Notice all the possible interaction options here. It’s not just the last-touch that brought the customer to the website. They can take many steps to get there.
Google Analytics has a few different attribution options built-in to help you change how conversions are assigned.
Image Source
These include:
Last Non-Direct Click: This will overlook Direct clicks and go to the channel used right before.
First Interaction: This uses the social or advertisement that got them to the website.
Linear: Here, each channel that a customer used before purchasing will get equal attribution.
Time Decay: This will consider the channel that was used immediately before conversion, rather than channels used in the past day/week/month.
Position: This model gives priority to the first and last channel used before conversion. Anything in the middle gets less attribution.
The depressing part, though?
There’s no right answer here. The attribution model you pick largely depends on your sales cycle, your customers, and even what specific objective you’re trying to figure out.
For example, if you’re spending a ton on ads, you might want to see how the First Interaction looks. Especially when using social ads that often bring people into your ecosystem for the very first time.
In other cases? It would be a terrible choice.
The trick is to know what you’re solving for, first. Then working backwards.
Conclusion
Data is important. It’s huge.
YOOGE.
But, be careful.
Google Analytics is a marvelous, cost effective, game changing tool.
However, it’s been known to lie a little from time-to-time. (Yes, we’re still talking about Google Analytics here.)
Remember that conversion results aren’t always spot on. Direct traffic data might not be correct. Vanity metrics aren’t everything. A/B results can fire off false positives. And last touch isn’t everything.
Uncovering biases is never fun.
But it’s the key to creating campaigns that actually achieve results.
Without just blowing a lot of hot air.
About the Author: Brad Smith is the founder of Codeless, a B2B content creation company. Frequent contributor to Kissmetrics, Unbounce, WordStream, AdEspresso, Search Engine Journal, Autopilot, and more.
5 Lies You Tell Yourself About Your Analytics (And How to Fix It)
0 notes