IM SORRY?????? ASLAN PUT A BUNCH OF BABIES IN CHARGE OF A KINDGOM?????
GET BACK HERE FURRY JESUS AND TELL ME HOW YOU JUSTIFY AN EIGHT YEAR OLD TO BE QUEEN
Edmund lives the rest of his life defining himself on a mistake he made when he was a BABY
THEYRE NOT EVEN PRETEENS YET???!!!
28 notes
·
View notes
Conservatives: Barbie is for WOMEN. Boys should NOT play with barbie dolls it makes them GAY and WEAK.
Conservative Men: WHY WASNT THIS BARBIE MOVIE MADE FOR ME???? This barbie movie shouldn't be about WOMEN why does this movie have a bunch of women?
24 notes
·
View notes
Thinking some fandom thoughts and then about ORV's portrayal of an author-character-reader relationship with the story and realising how....lacking at times the whole death of the author perspective on media can be.
(Turned out to be long and rambly so I put it under a cut. If you like death of the author, probably not for your worldview? Also, beware major ORV spoilers if you care about that)
Like, perhaps I'm misinterpreting something here, but in ORV, we had these three characters plus an entire system that gave us a look into the relationship between author/reader/character. And focusing on the Han Sooyoung, Kim Dokja, and Yoo Joonghyuk dynamic, I realise that none of them really died. Pushing asides Joonghyuk and Dokja for the moment (as I am talking about death of the author), we have Han Sooyoung whose consciousness faded after finishing Ways of Survival.
However, I don't know if we can really call that death of the author, really. Because Sooyoung's whole purpose in writing ORV, her authorial intention, was to save Kim Dokja's life...which she DID. And even after the story left her hands, her intentions were imprinted into the story itself. Yes, Dokja realised that the system was lenient to him because of (spoiler alert) his status as the OD. But at the same time, I think that Han Sooyoung's authorial intent to keep Dokja alive with WoS can also be taken as a factor in the system's leniency towards our reader.
And just jumping from that back to my original point, while death of the author IS fun and can be awesome for reinterpreting stories that the author may have intended as problematic (to our modern standards, at least), to separate the actual story itself from its creator seems just....a tad disrespectful to the author.
Or maybe disrespectful isn't the right word. Like, say, even if said author is objectively the worst of humans, there remains the fact that the story in essence has part of them embedded into it. It doesn't make sense, at least to me, to only give "morally okay" writers the allowance of people who put a part of themselves in their works. Any writer, even those who are writing for money imo, can't help but put part of their own selves into their story...and to separate the story from the author just because we hate the author or hate their beliefs seems a bit counter-productive. You can't just say, after all, that this author's vulnerability in their writing is okay because it's Correct but this other guy's vulnerability should be ignored because it's chalk full of Problematic Content.
But again, that's not to justify authors you dislike or the deeply wrong messages implied in their works. Especially those that could easily be shooed away by employing death of the author. But I think I'd consider fanfic or analyses that ignore authorial intent and their message to be something...new entirely? (Best way I can say it is something something death of an author employed to help the reader create their own narrative inspired by someone else's story rather than it being used to ignore author intent and claim our interpretation is what canon actually meant).
I think there's a saying in music as well as writing that you could play the same exact score or write the same story, it's just that things will come out different depending on the player or writer. (That's not a perfect comparison because the player/musician who WROTE the score could be considered a reader/author relationship...the point is more that the same thing will look different in the hands of different people. And that just as the reader will interpret something in their own way when reading/re-reading (another ORV reference), the author also has placed in their own interpretation and intent in that own work...which should at worst be respected because they DID make that content (and then we proceed to brutally revise it to make something we like better xD) or at best be taken as "word of god" for lack of a better term)
Not sure if any of this makes sense, and I definitely don't have any factual evidence to back up this opinion, but it was just something I was thinking of.
TL:dR? Death of the author is FUN and actually pretty cool but I think the things coming out of it are new(ish) things/works entirely, and og author's beliefs/intentions are important to consider for that text they wrote in of itself.
8 notes
·
View notes
there is a line, i think. i complain a lot (or if i don't, well, pretend i do? because it feels like i do) about quirkless hero/vigilante deku and the meta surrounding it, but you can't make him... like... worship ofa* either. that's weird. you're using him as a soapbox if you write like that. it's especially weird to make him attribute everything in heroics to quirks and quirks only when all might is quirkless and is currently beating afo's ass, making your take (through deku's tongue) demonstrably false. deku has nothing but respect for all might, even in his current state, and making him too focused on ofa as the only solution to him accessing heroics is. weird. not to bring movie 3 into a discussion again but there's some relevant dialogue from the flect fight:
"[The Quirk doomsday theory is] not true! Whether someone has a Quirk or is Quirkless doesn't mean they're sick or anything! We're all alive! We're all human!"
he's not exactly caught up on the idea that being quirkless is inherently worse than having a quirk. we know he suffered for it, and we can speculate he's not comfortable talking about his experience with it (kouta at camp (72), referring to himself in the third person. primarily, he was keeping the secret, but he looks surprised at himself for even bringing it up). but he doesn't hate it. that would be giving up a part of himself, and he holds those cards carefully close. his upbringing informs his beliefs. if anything, it should be quite precious to him, especially knowing the other quirkless characters and how he views them.
obviously ofa was deku's ticket into heroics, and pretending he could've gotten there by any other means (considering the points of access afforded to a quirkless middle schooler who has no connections) is foolish. but he clearly does not believe the quirk makes the hero, or he would've lost any respect he had for all might the moment he said "now, it's your turn."
*by "worship ofa", i'm not referring to him considering the power as something special. he textually did this and got called out by multiple people for it, most notably gran torino. in this context, it's more like exaggerated reverence for the power as deku's salvation; something that rescued him from the terrible dredgery of quirklessness and opened up endless doors of opportunity for him. whether or not the power actually did this is irrelevant; the point is that deku doesn't think of it that way. he's much more captivated by ofa as a blessing generously provided by all might that allowed him to (specifically) train to become a hero. he doesn't seem to mind very much that he was quirkless unless the idea of his worthiness as a successor is questioned.
1 note
·
View note
a lot of mcu movies are propaganda and i know that blah blah blah but picking on them is low hanging fruit because everyone sees that but i see the artsy hoes rating artsy movies 4/5 stars on letterboxd when the movie is like "latin america is hell and ugly and yellow. americans are heroes. we owe the fbi everything" just because it had pretty pictures... BUT no depth or substance. at this point i just want y'all to have the same energy with these movies and ask yourselves why y'all see countries like mexico as full of criminals and narcos and shit
11 notes
·
View notes
(( I’ve definitely written it out before, but:
Miranda’s actually one of those people who doesn’t get scared by horror!
Of course, she will hem and haw and refuse to engage with it, play up how scared she is of horror, but that’s not really formed out of any real experience with the subject. She’s never seen any horror movies before, but she knows they’re supposed to scare her, so she assumes they will be scary to her. It’s not that she’s intentionally trying to mislead people, there’s just a disconnect between the reality and what Miranda assumes.
Of course, the second you actually manage to sit her down for something horror-related, and past the moment of her worrying about how scary it will be, she just... never reacts in fear to it. Mostly this is in part due to having lived through equally as bad, if not sometimes worse, situations herself — but there’s a fair part of it that occurs just because she’s a merfolk. They have a very different set of cultural fears than your typical western horror movie, and quite a lot that’s scary to us is just life to them. They aren’t going to be scared of a shark, even if it has started to hunt them, because that’s just day-to-day life with them. It happens. It’s not great, but they don’t spend a lot of time worrying about it, and a lot of the hype is entirely missed. Open spaces aren’t so scary when you live in the ocean and it goes on forever in every direction, nor is the dark when you’re made to live in absolute darkness. Trying to play off the fear of spiders and arthropods is going to go nowhere, when most merfolk associate chitinous bodies and the way they move with either food or cleaning.
There are some plots that do bother Miranda, particularly topics around body-snatching, but that seldom goes all the way into fear. If anything, it’s more of a persistent discomfort, rather than genuine fear.
So if you do get Miranda to participate in horror, she’s probably not going to react to it! Either that, or constantly sit there asking when the scary parts are going to begin, right at the climax of the movie. You might even get her staring at the special effects and talking about how, when you do that to a person, it doesn’t work/look like that. Or, you could even get Miranda getting excited about the kills, usually in more tortureporn-esque genres.
3 notes
·
View notes