Tumgik
#gta 5 fails
games2b · 2 years
Text
0 notes
ufopigeon · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
match made in hell
679 notes · View notes
sharmoota-job · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
michael de santa is the most attractive fictional character ive ever seen in my whole life. hes so handsome. i would DIE for him
143 notes · View notes
sterlinggalaxy13 · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
✨️ 🌌 ✨️
4 notes · View notes
aestheticsyoutubers · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
jaren smith, smii7y ↳ gta 5 races where everything goes wrong
9 notes · View notes
progamingstudiohd · 21 days
Video
youtube
GTA 5 Spiderman Falling off Highest #4 Funny Moments & GTA 5 Gameplay Fails
0 notes
hatausta · 2 months
Text
GTA Hataları ve Çözümleri
https://hatausta.com/gta-hatalari-ve-cozumleri/
GTA Hataları ve Çözümleri
Tumblr media
0 notes
thebattlesking · 1 year
Text
youtube
0 notes
solus-skylighter · 1 year
Text
youtube
1 note · View note
motors04 · 1 year
Text
0 notes
games2b · 2 years
Text
0 notes
foxeheart · 2 years
Text
Damn you, Billy. 📡Dawn Moxie👾 Editor-in-Chief of Life Invader Media 🔟 District 10 GTA Roleplay
0 notes
jeffgerstmann · 5 months
Note
I mean, what GTA seems to be at this point is twenty-year old game mechanics and sensibilities somehow making dumptrucks of money solely through whatever weird business people get up to in the online.
What I remember most from 5 is how limited everything was in what you could do compared to the previous games. The number of fail states during missions if you deviated even slightly from their carefully-crafted path was crazy for an open world game.
I'm not saying any of the previous GTAs were perfect, but there was an ambition to 3, Vice City, and San Andreas that I haven't seen since then except for making everything look really nice. Rockstar pretty much defined the open world with cars genre until Saints Row started ramping up and ever since then they've been focusing more on their tales of human drama that I don't think the quality of writing can support.
I think you're mostly right, but I also think San Andreas more or less mastered (or at least maxed out) some sort of level of ambition for that style of GTA game. Pushing further in that direction would've meant diminishing returns and a dedication to absurdity that was never really their goal in the first place. After three games of "let's see how many cops I can kill with infinite rocket launchers" or whatever, GTA4 pushed in a new direction that finally made that sort of stuff seem out of place. Say what you will about the quality of GTA4, but at least it showed they had something different up their sleeve and wanted to do something more.
I think GTA4 and 5 are fine. The quality of writing is fine. They're watching a lot of movies and trying to write things that remind them of the movies they like. It's always been that. The stuff they're doing is at least on par with, like, standard Hollywood blockbuster action movie/crime drama stuff. It's a hard line to walk, but I think they've walked it well enough so far.
If anything, I think their sense of humor is the thing that's gotten the most stale over the years, but in some sick way, their dedication to it gives the franchise a certain through-line that it'd otherwise lack. It has a charm to it, for all its stale satire and dick jokes.
I don't know, I'm really interested to see what they've been working on. I bet they'll end up moving some things forward in weird and unexpected ways but hey, at this point, you probably have a pretty good idea of what they're making and if you're interested in that or not. At some point there'll probably be a mission where you have to tail a car without getting too close and you'll think "I can't fucking believe they're still making these shit-ass missions in these games." Personally, my concern would be that they'd focus even more on the online side of the game, which didn't especially interest me last time.
25 notes · View notes
dalekofchaos · 5 months
Text
Red Dead Redemption 3:Mac Callander's story
While I'd prefer the third game would be about either Landon Ricketts or Sadie, Charles and Jack, I do see the potential of Mac Callander as the protagonist of the story.
Tumblr media
Rockstar gave many clues. Even though we never see him, everyone remembers him with love and longing, Bill calls him both a good person and heartless (this may be the honor system), and the fact that he was on the ferry during the Blackwater robbery is another reason.
Arthur was not on the ferry so we could not observe the events there. On the ferry were Dutch, Micah, Sean, John, Javier, Davey and Mac. Names like Arthur, Jenny, Hosea, Lenny, Bill and Charles were only present in the Blackwater massacre but not on the ferry, and this is definitely a reason for Mac to be the main character. We can see the Blackwater massacre and the failed robbery on the ferry through Mac's eyes.
In an interrupted dialogue, it is said that when Arthur's horse was shot at Blackwater, Mac gave him his horse to escape. This is a fitting ending for the main character of RDR. Arthur helped John escape.
John also helped Jack escape. If Mac helps Arthur escape, as in this dialogue, he will definitely complete his atonement before he dies, and we already know what happened to Mac. He gave Arthur his horse and was later killed by Milton. We will see Mac and Davey's brotherly relationship, just like Arthur and John's brotherly relationship. Mac is not the wild guy he is made out to be.
It seemed to me that Davey was the crueler brother, while Mac was the softer one. Milton told Arthur that Mac taught him philosophy, which shows that Mac was a philosophical character like Arthur.
Some people say the Callander brothers can't be the main characters because they're wild, but everyone except Lenny and Charles loved them. Lenny and Charles hadn't been in a gang long enough to like them. One of our main characters abandoned his 1-year-old child and the other beat a man with tuberculosis to death.
So Mac and Davey are no better or worse than Arthur and John. Mac could be the main character because no one talks bad about him. If someone talks bad, they either badmouth Davey or say "Callander brothers." Mac was probably disliked by Lenny and Charles because he sided with Davey, because Lenny and Charles never spoke ill of Mac. But Lenny specifically guesses that Davey started the Blackwater massacre.
Also, Charles said that the brothers were wild, they never talked bad about Mac, they only talked bad about Davey because according to the dialogue, Davey is a professional poker player, a brawler and a drunk, but there is no evidence that he is a bad person. And honestly I think it would be cool to have the brothers be duel honor siblings. Mac is high honor, while Davey is low honor.
Everyone in the gang, including Hosea and Arthur, misses the Callander brothers. Believe me, the people Hosea loves can never be bad. Maybe we can switch between Davey and Mac like in GTA 5. Some say we should play Jack's experiences after RDR1 or Dutch's story of establishing the gang. But neither of these are redemption stories.
There's no redemption for Jack and Dutch, but there's still redemption for Mac. At the same time, the Wild West was already over in 1914, so it would be ridiculous to play Jack. It would be ridiculous to play a character like Dutch who has no redemption story and is also the villain of the first two games
Some people ask how Arthur can be a playable character in the epilogue of the game if Mac is the main character and the last mission of the game is the Blackwater massacre, because there are 3 days between the Blackwater massacre and the beginning of RDR2. You remember, Arthur had a saying like this: "A friend of mine used to say: Revenge is a fool's game." In the Epilogue part of the game, the dead main character is avenged, but if Arthur says revenge is absurd, there is no need for him to take revenge.
Arthur doesn't have anyone he can take revenge on anyway. He can't kill Milton because Abigail kills him later. In a newspaper in RDR1, it is said that a character of the game, Landon Rickets, took part in the Blackwater Massacre in 1899. Maybe in the Epilogue, we can play out how Landon escaped to Mexico after the massacre.
We saw Davey for a total of 20 seconds, and we also saw Jenny in a drawing in Arthur's diary. And these two characters have graves, but we have never seen Mac, and Mac does not have a grave, and this adds extra mystery to it. It's like we are being given a sign by not having a grave for the 3rd game
15 notes · View notes
zot3-flopped · 3 days
Note
Ok second part from the critic is funny so i will write it down as well
Sonically it is better but it is just tolerable, still lacking in inspiration
Weirdly he says, taylor calls out that other people seem to know better what is good for her but then in black dog she exhibits a level of toxicity that he find worrying. She writes about somebody sharing her location with her. He says „taylor is watching her exes move through her phone, as if it is any of her business and then being judgemental about what her ex is doing as if she is not being weird. A normal person or somebody with boundaries or respect for privacy would turn off the location thing but instead she is writing a song abour fuming over where he is, what he is doing, jokes he is telling, who he is seeing, oh she is too young to know a song. Like weren‘t you just earlier on the record being pissed at people for being judgemental over them knowing whats better for you. And what is more toxic, calling people out or you on your private jet watching a tiny dot on a map and pretending you were the perfect partner and then writing a song that is blatantly unself aware of just how unflattering it‘s coming across. Just gross and obsessive“
He said the instrumental on pt 2 is better but the lyrics are bad: the gta lyric??
And the 1800 lyric as well??
He likes some ideas of songs but there is no passion or drive.
He likes around 4 songs on this one because the lyrics are good but the instrumental isn‘t groundbreaking but it shows how she cannn make good songs but it isn‘t happening on the first part of the album so after 2 hours it is just coming a bit too late. It‘s tiring. She is too big to fail he says and quality is suffering. He called it EMBARRASSING to bring out those albums but he knows they will obviously make money, no career wise complications since some critics like it and swifties love it.
4 to light 5 out of 10 on this one. He said ofc swifties will support it so it will sell millions, but people outside of that bubble will scratch their head and cringe about what this album has to offer
Link: https://youtu.be/vN6MuBfbt_E?si=--cxmlf7338_yNdJ
Thank you!
15 notes · View notes
boccher · 5 months
Note
tumblr account boccher ily but if i see someone reblog an unsubstantiated 2 month old gta 6 rumour (the basis being "oh the budget is rumoured to be $1-2 billion so they'd have to make it $150 a copy to make a profit" failing to consider how gta 5 made $1 billion in 3 days so the sequel is obviously going to make back it's budget very quickly even at the regular video game price tag) based on a tumblr post of a headline after we all watched a 4 hour documentary on youtube plagiarism that talked on how we all believe things at face value generally without researching i think im actually going to go insane and scream and vomit ok ily tumblr account boccher but PLEASE
ok fair lemme retag that post Also I never took note of game prices on account of never playing any big name games and i just realised 150usd is 230aud?? thats ridiculous lol yeah tabloids love to pull numbers out their ass
14 notes · View notes