Tumgik
#byung-chul han
kafk-a · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
Byung-Chul Han, from an interview published in ArtReview
6K notes · View notes
exhaled-spirals · 6 months
Text
« Today, all time-consuming practices, such as trust, loyalty, commitment and responsibility, are disappearing. […] I think trust is a social practice, and today it is being replaced by transparency and information. Trust enables us to build positive relationships with others, despite lacking knowledge. In a transparency society, one immediately asks for information from others. Trust as a social practice becomes superfluous. The transparency and information society fosters a society of distrust. »
— Byung-Chul Han, “I Practise Philosophy as Art”
500 notes · View notes
thirdity · 5 months
Quote
In the course of general acceleration and hyperactivity we are also losing the capacity for rage. Rage has a characteristic temporality incompatible with generalized acceleration and hyperactivity, which admit no breadth of time. The future shortens into a protracted present. It lacks all negativity, which would permit one to look at the Other. In contrast, rage puts the present as a whole into question. It presupposes an interrupting pause in the present... The general distraction afflicting contemporary society does not allow the emphasis and energy of rage to arise. Rage is the capacity to interrupt a given state and make a new state begin. Today it is yielding more and more to offense or annoyance, "having a beef", which proves incapable of effecting decisive change.
Byung-chul Han, The Burnout Society
209 notes · View notes
Text
Today’s society is no longer Foucault’s disciplinary world of hospitals, madhouses, prisons, barracks, and factories. It has long been replaced by another regime, namely a society of fitness studios, office towers, banks, airports, shopping malls, and genetic laboratories. The society of the 21st century is no longer disciplinary, but a society of the performance. Nor are its inhabitants called ‘subjects of obedience’, but ‘subjects of performance’. These subjects are entrepreneurs of themselves.
Excess work and performance escalate into auto-exploitation. This is much more effective than the exploitation by the others, because it is accompanied by a feeling of freedom. The exploiter is the same exploited. Victim and executioner can no longer differentiate. This self-referentiality generates a paradoxical freedom, which, because of the structures of obligation immanent to it, becomes violence […] In this society of obligation, each one carries with him his forced labor field.
What proves problematic is not individual competition per se, but rather its self-referentiality, which escalates into absolute competition. That is, the achievement-subject competes with itself; it succumbs to the destructive compulsion to outdo itself over and over, to jump over its own shadow. This self-constraint, which poses as freedom, has deadly results..
No-longer-being-able-to-be-able leads to destructive self-reproach and auto-aggression. The achievement-subject finds itself fighting with itself. The depressive has been wounded by internalized war. Depression is the sickness of a society that suffers from excessive positivity. It reflects a humanity waging war on itself.
Today, everyone is an auto-exploiting labourer in his or her own enterprise. People are now master and slave in one. Even class struggle has transformed into an inner struggle against oneself.
― Byung-Chul Han, extracts from The Burnout Society
636 notes · View notes
crucifiedlovers · 2 months
Text
For Barthes, veiling is an essential part of eroticism. The 'most erotic portion' of a body is 'where the garment gapes', that piece of skin which flashes 'between two articles of clothing...between two edges...'. What is erotic is the 'staging of an appearance-as-disappearing'. Tear, break and gap account for the erotic... The erotic can do without truth. It is semblance, a phenomenon pertaining to the veil.
Byung-Chul Han, Saving Beauty (trans. Daniel Steuer)
47 notes · View notes
giuliavaldi · 6 months
Text
Oggi corriamo dietro alle informazioni senz’approdare ad alcun sapere. Prendiamo nota di tutto senza imparare a conoscerlo. Viaggiamo ovunque senza fare vera esperienza. Comunichiamo ininterrottamente senza prendere parte a una comunità. Salviamo quantità immani di dati senza far risuonare i ricordi. Accumuliamo amici e follower senza mai incontrare l’Altro. Così le informazioni generano un modo di vivere privo di tenuta e di durata.
Byung-Chul Han, Le non cose. Come abbiamo smesso di vivere il reale
61 notes · View notes
apesoformythoughts · 5 months
Text
“We owe true happiness to the useless and purposeless, to what is intentionally convoluted, what is unproductive, indirect, exuberant, superfluous, to beautiful forms and gestures that have no use and serve no purpose. Unlike walking to a destination, running somewhere or marching, taking a leisurely stroll is a luxury. Ceremonious inactivity means: we do something, but to no end. This 'to-no-end', this freedom from purpose and usefulness, is the essential core of inactivity. It is the basic formula for happiness.”
— Byung-Chul Han: Vita Contemplativa
29 notes · View notes
389 · 11 months
Text
This constant self-flagellation is tiring and depressing. The work itself, no matter how hard it may be, does not lead to profound tiredness. Even though we can be tired after work, it is not the same as a destructive tiredness. Work at some point comes to an end. The pressure to perform that we apply to ourselves, on the other hand outlasts the working hours. It torments us in our sleep and frequently leads to sleepless nights. It is possible to recover from work. But it is impossible to recover from the pressure to perform.
Byung-Chul Han: “I Practise Philosophy as Art”
84 notes · View notes
thoughtportal · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
The agony of Eros
Byung-Chul Han
23 notes · View notes
sammeldeineknochen · 3 months
Text
Die Selbstausbeutung ist effizienter als die Fremdausbeutung, denn sie geht mit dem Gefühl der Freiheit einher.
Byung-Chul Han: "Müdigkeitsgesellschaft/Burnoutgesellschaft/Hoch-Zeit", S.94
16 notes · View notes
yr-bed · 2 months
Text
Rituals are architectures of time, structuring and stabilising life, and they are on the wane. The pandemic has accelerated the disappearance of rituals. Work also has ritual aspects. We go to work at set times. Work takes place in a community. In the home office, the ritual of work is completely lost. The day loses its rhythm and structure. This somehow makes us tired and depressed. In The Little Prince [1943], by [Antoine de] Saint-Exupéry, the little prince asks the fox to always visit at the exact same time, so that the visit becomes a ritual. The little prince explains to the fox what a ritual is. Rituals are to time as rooms are to an apartment. They make time accessible like a house. They organise time, arrange it. In this way you make time appear meaningful. Time today lacks a solid structure. It is not a house, but a capricious river. The disappearance of rituals does not simply mean that we have more freedom. The total flexibilisation of life brings loss, too. Rituals may restrict freedom, but they structure and stabilise life. They anchor values and symbolic systems in the body, reinforcing community. In rituals we experience community, communal closeness, physically. Digitalisation strips away the physicality of the world. Then comes the pandemic. It aggravates the loss of the physical experience of community. You’re asking: can’t we do this by ourselves? Today we reject all rituals as something external, formal and therefore inauthentic. Neoliberalism produces a culture of authenticity, which places the ego at its centre. The culture of authenticity develops a suspicion of ritualised forms of interaction. Only spontaneous emotions, subjective states, are authentic. Modelled behaviour, for example courtesy, is written off as inauthentic or superficial. The narcissistic cult of authenticity is partly responsible for the increasing brutality of society.
Byung-Chul Han
3 notes · View notes
newintrigue · 1 month
Text
Art in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
We are entering an era of upheaval that some are calling the fourth industrial revolution.[1] The rise of artificial intelligence, and in particular generative art, threatens to upend our social and cultural landscape, leading to a renewed conflict between mechanical technique, art, and culture. While some technologists are proclaiming the death of art,[2] a murder allegedly committed by…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
2 notes · View notes
exhaled-spirals · 6 months
Text
« Over three years I established a winter-flowering garden. I also wrote a book about it with the title Praise to the Earth [2018]. My understanding from being a gardener is: Earth is magic. Whoever claims otherwise is blind. Earth is not a resource, not a mere means to achieve human ends. Our relationship to nature today is not determined by astonished observation, but solely by instrumental action. […] It is not enough that we now have to be more careful with Earth as a resource. Rather, we need a completely different relationship with Earth. We should give it back its magic, its dignity. We should learn to marvel at it again. […] We should rediscover the capacity for inaction. »
— Byung-Chul Han, “I Practise Philosophy as Art”
350 notes · View notes
thirdity · 8 months
Quote
If sleep represents the high point of bodily relaxation, deep boredom is the peak of mental relaxation. A purely hectic rush produces nothing new. It reproduces and accelerates what is already available.
Byung-chul Han, The Burnout Society
233 notes · View notes
brechtian · 2 years
Text
"In contemporary American self-help literature, the magic word is healing. The term refers to self-optimization that is supposed to therapeutically eliminate any and all functional weakness or mental obstacle in the name of efficiency and performance. Yet perpetual self-optimization, which coincides point-for-point with the optimization of the system, is proving destructive. It is leading to mental collapse. Self-optimization, it turns out, amounts to total self-exploitation."
--Byung-Chul Han, Psycho-Politics
99 notes · View notes
crucifiedlovers · 2 months
Text
As opposed to beauty, the sublime does not cause an immediate feeling of pleasure. As in Burke, the initial sensation in reaction to the sublime is pain or displeasure. The sublime is too enormous, too huge for the imagination, which cannot capture it and is unable to condense it into a picture. Thus, the subject is shocked and overwhelmed by it. This is what constitutes the negativity of the sublime. When looking at vast natural phenomena, the subject initially feels powerless. But it regains its composure through that 'self-preservation of quite another kind'. It takes refuse in the inwardness of reason and its idea of infinity compared to which 'everything in nature is small'.
Byung-Chul Han, Saving Beauty (trans. Daniel Steuer)
21 notes · View notes