Tumgik
dkl9 · 5 months
Note
on what keyboard? they're very close
Tumblr media
do you think anyone's ever typoed "AI foom" as "AI foot" and accidentally glimpsed a bunch of AI generated foot kink images
Tumblr media
I was going to say googling "AI foot" probably doesn't give you a bunch of AI generated foot pics but it totally does. still think this is pretty unlikely cause of how far T and M are from each other on the keyboard
3 notes · View notes
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
a scientist's h-index is the maximum h such that they have h papers with h citations each
by analogy, i introduce the t-index: a blogger's maximum t such that one has t posts with t notes each
0 notes
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
phonetics has ruined my brain i see ʃ for integration and i think of voiceless postalveolar fricatives
calculus has ruined my brain i see dx for diagnosis and i think of arbitrarily small rectangles
156 notes · View notes
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
losing all will to live isn't so bad so long as you concurrently lose all will to die
0 notes
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
this sentence is a reminder for whatever it reminds you of
0 notes
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
being a double-stroke letter people might interpret it like ℂ (complex) or ℕ (naturals) i.e. an infinite set/number system
perhaps SO(2)
Why do we use τ to represent 2*π when we could use ℼ
36 notes · View notes
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
if you get attacked by a demon just knock it into cold water
being adapted to the fires of hell demons do not generate body heat and would quickly freeze to death
1 note · View note
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
i'm addicted to black fabric
it's quite habit-forming
1 note · View note
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
Physics: Anthropology is just stamp collecting ... which is to say that people are just stamps, yes.
Geology: I think geology should be one of the big fields of science. It doesn’t really fit neatly as a branch of physics, chemistry, or biology since it draws on all three.
Physics: No. For one, everything is physics so that argument doesn't mean anything.
Biology: UnLeSs iT's StAmP CoLlEcTiNg, right?
Physics: *sighs*
Biology: Also we’re called ‘the big three’, if we added another then it’d be, like, more than three. Some mysterious higher number.
Chemistry: Besides, we’re the big fields because we’re the most important and popular.
Geology: Geology is important! We’re the ones who find all the oil to mine! 
Biology: Yeah, could you stop doing that, actually? It’s kinda, y’know, causing the slow apocalypse as we speak. But at least it’s better than the fast nuclear apocalypse, physics.
Physics: Ummm… You know what? I’ve had enough of you stamp collectors with your… uh… collections of things! I'm not letting you join our club unless you can do math. 
Biology: *Gasps* not math…
Geology: *hides rock collection behind back* Hey, I do… math. Sometimes.
Physics: Yeah? Like what?
Geology: Oh, y’know, just some geometry and a little geophysical fluid dynamics of the entire mantle, ocean, and atmosphere.
Physics: Oh, shit, I can't even do that. You’re in.
Chemistry: Alright, but don’t let the social sciences know we’re letting new people in or-
Anthropology: HEY GUYS
1K notes · View notes
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
Pure logical argument weakens claims
In formal logic, the law of addition says that, from true proposition P, you can correctly conclude P∨Q, for any propositions P and Q.
...
P∨Q is weaker (less strict) than just P. This is true, but it's not unique to the law of addition. Every fundamental logical law produces conclusions at most as strong as its inputs, and often weaker.
...
Logical work just helps to interpret the set of worlds your observations accept as options. If pure logic could rule out possible worlds, you might rule out the one true world and not know it, thereby missing the point of valid argument.
Logic is still useful sith a weak claim focused on what we care about (like the mortality of Socrates) is often more useful than a more precise claim with confusingly irrelevant details (like the humanity of Socrates and the mortality of humans).
Applying modus ponens, conjunctive simplification, or syllogism doesn't get rid of the strong input claims P, P∧Q, or P→Q, respectively — they don't diminish your total knowledge — but addition just as well keeps around the original P, and to ignore that is to judge logical laws by different standards.
0 notes
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
I would like to know why the same answer is given twice.
Tumblr media
30K notes · View notes
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
Bob: *hands visibly burned* Alice: why the burns? Bob: well, i was taking a multivariable calculus quiz, and i forgot to write my vector hats, so the professor brought out his flamethrower ...
5 notes · View notes
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
complex analysts
they conjugate with a bar
(more like this in my collection)
what kind of mathematician drinks, drank, are drinking, and will drink?
(punchline coming soon)
1 note · View note
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
i can't work, i'm too busy being unemployed
0 notes
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
what kind of mathematician drinks, drank, are drinking, and will drink?
(punchline coming soon)
1 note · View note
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
watch me take, take the drugs away
my heart could be burnin', but i will soon relieve the pain
watch me take, take the drugs away
i'll still keep the body runnin', not one cell out of place
0 notes
dkl9 · 5 months
Text
NO BOTCHING
ONLY BODGING
0 notes