Tumgik
#300kmh
speedyaprilia · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
DVE BESNE MASINE VRISTE🥳🥳🤗🤗🤓
2 notes · View notes
44whispers · 2 years
Text
they saw us say we’re scared of the leclerc radio graphic and decided to have full conversations on it
25 notes · View notes
wtfuckevenknows · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
Cute that they call that high speed (I drive faster on the highway) 😂
I’m taking the train to Frankfurt in august and it only needs 45 minutes because it goes 300kmh (187mph according to google)
2 notes · View notes
script-a-world · 9 months
Text
Submitted via Google Form:
I was wondering aboyt creating a world of winged people, especially how their architecture would look. I imagine they'd have lots of tall towers with few ground entrances, most Entrances are partway up buildings or on rooftops. I also suppose the doors are wider than tall for their wings. How about security though, when every balcony/window is a potential entrance? Maybe windows are supposed to be small or doesn't open wide so people can't easily fit through? Would they have separate vocabulary between a balcony as we actually have but can also double as an entrance and a balcony that is meant to be an entrance to a building? Maybe buildings that even lack stairs or lifts is quite common?  Anything I'm missing or need to take into account? Also I imagine some of the homeless population might be in the trees I guess? Hey so I asked earlier today about a race of flying people. Just one more questions if you don't mind. What flying speeds/endurance would make sense? As I have it now, the top athletes can reach speeds of up to 350kmh, the equivalent of sprinting and can only sustain it for a minute. But I suppose the average person's top speeds would be more like 300kmh? The average person's casual speed would be around 80kmh I suppose, the equivalent of leisurely walking.
Ebonwing: Depends on how comfortable they are with walking. Lots of winged humans in fiction are as comfortable with walking as they are with flying, and if they are and do a lot of walking they’d have ground entrances and whatnot. If they *don’t* feel comfortable with it, or if it’s difficult for them, then they might favour building upwards rather than sideways. 
That being said, only air entrances are unlikely. There will be people who can’t fly well or at all, be it because they’re children or old or disabled. Unless you want to create a society that excludes these groups, you will need to construct your buildings around the presence of ground entrances.
When it comes to security, all you need is break-in secure doors and windows you can close at night, or shutters that are secure that you can close. Getting up on the balcony is often not that difficult in real life either, after all. 
Having different words for main-door-balcony and non-main-door balcony is certainly possible, but they might also just not distinguish between balconies and entrances, where balcony and front door are synonymous but the rare balcony that doesn’t have a door inside gets a different word. 
In terms of speed: Winged humans already don’t make much sense from a logical standpoint, which is fine because people are willing to suspend their disbelief for it. That also means you have leeway when it comes to top speeds, but consider that the fastest bird we know of is the peregrine falcon with a top speed of 389km/h according to wikipedia, which isn’t that much faster than your winged people–and that’s diving speed, not regular flight speed. Most birds will not reach 350 or even 300 km/h, and your average speed is likewise higher than most bird’s average. I personally would find it difficult to believe they can go faster than almost all real birds. That being said, do you even need to put a hard number on it? If you’re creating this species for a story, most people won’t care too much about how fast exactly they can go. 
Licorice: Ebonwing makes a good point: your society will need to consider the needs of its members who cannot fly well or at all because they are too young, too old, or disabled. 
As well as their wings, you need to consider their legs and feet. Many species of birds cannot perch, and some cannot walk. I’m not enough of an ornithologist to know which ones exactly, but I have never seen a duck or a swan in a tree, and although the place I live is swarming with seagulls, I’ve never seen a seagull perching in a tree either. Ducks and swans nest on the ground whereas the seagulls around here prefer rooftops, especially flat ones.
 I think the anatomy of your people’s legs and feet may dictate their architecture as much as their wings will. 
You may have noticed that birds who can fly often choose not to, especially if they’re only going a short distance. IIRC, for many species of birds it takes a lot more effort to get airborne than it does to start walking. Your winged people may prefer stairs; it may just be easier for them. 
I was wondering whether a society of people who can fly would develop an etiquette for respecting each other’s privacy. For example, in our society it’s considered very rude to walk up to a stranger’s house and peer in through their windows. Your flying people might have some similar protocol about not flying over or close to each other’s dwellings, unless invited. 
Feral: In architectural terms, a balcony is very much not an entrance (note in the link that “accessible” here refers to accessibility from an interior room). Neither is a window. In written media, being specific with your terminology can go a long way to keep you having to break down every little detail. What you are describing is more like a porch, which has the added benefit of sounding like “perch,” or veranda. (I thought it might also be helpful to know what a terrace is, as that seems like a practical addition to your architecture.)
Could someone leave or break-in via a balcony or window? Yes, of course, they can and do without wings here on Earth, but if you are clear with your terms, that will be understood your audience as at best not the intended use and at worst abhorrent and criminal use without you needing to say so. 
26 notes · View notes
youjustwaitsunshine · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
300kmh through the countryside
Tumblr media
13 notes · View notes
russilton · 6 months
Text
Lewis has no pace, George is getting slowly more frustrated with how they’re just sliding backwards, both their radios are just management coast lift etc etc.
the rest of the radios today are not going to be fun.
But at 300kmh hour at one of the races the two of them want to win more than anything, I expected it
8 notes · View notes
abr · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
405kmh per la precisione. Poi dice che l'assessor Mazzei di Milano c'ha torto a voler portare il limite in città a 300kmh - Wtf ?!!?
(tra il senso dei numeri, cioè la realtà conoscibile non opinabile e il milieu culturale di giornalai più intellettuame vario di provincia, c'è sempre stata la Cortina di Ferro).
5 notes · View notes
Note
Come on, when your team is Mercedes you don't need to be reciting the rules at 300kmh. If something's not right, they'll make sure to check, and you can talk after the race if you don't agree etc. No wonder Toto intervened 🙄
Come on, regardless of what team a driver is with, if they see someone ahead of them blatantly break the rules, they have every fucking right to complain. George had every right to moan about Checo.
4 notes · View notes
randomrepeat-blog · 2 days
Text
Tuesday Train, The Shinkansen, Mishima in Japan
This week I took my first ever bullet train from Mishima to Kyoto. 300kmh. Japan is developing a maglev network to go even faster – I need to come …Tuesday Train, The Shinkansen, Mishima in Japan
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
serpentium13 · 24 days
Text
youtube
I feel like going fast,like going very fast somewhere like seeing only a glimpse of what surrounds me,as I am in a car and going with 300kmh ,like I am addicted to this speed.I feel being in so many places so many lights.
0 notes
kenthenugget · 5 months
Text
Brightline West will Change the Perception of High Speed Rail in America
(Yes I know this not related to art but I really wanted to talk about this)
Yesterday, it was announced that Brightline, a passenger rail company running higher speed trains in Florida, had received $3 billion of federal funding which will allow them to begin construction on their high speed rail between Las Vegas and Las Angeles area. And this will actually be a true high speed rail line with a top speed of 185mph (300kmh) on a dedicated right of way built in between the median of I-15. As someone who's been following this project and Brightline for 5 years, this news excites me because not only do I have the utmost faith that they'll get this project done within the 2 to 3 years projected, but I truly believe with the completion of this railroad, that public perception of high speed rail and passenger rail in general will change for the good. I know that's a loaded statement but here me out.
In the United States, we dont have any form of high speed rail. We have the Northeast Corridor, Brightline in Florida, and places in Illinois and Michigan where trains run faster than the national capped speed limit of 79mph, but not much in the way of true high speed rail like in France and Japan. In fact, we probably have the most outdated national passenger network in the world. That wasnt always the case, we used to have one of the best passenger trains in the world.....until the end of world war 2 however. With the rise of the automobile, car dependant suburbs, and a highway network, trains were seen as an outdated form of transport with the car being seen as the future. This wasn't exclusive to America though, as many 1st world countries 50s also had this mindset. To most, trains would eventually go the way of the canal.........that is until Japan stepped in showed the world that the train wasnt dead through the creation of the Shinkansen, the world's first modern high speed rail line. Many countries would follow Japan's example, including France, Germany, Italy, and others. But as for America.....its complicated. The high speed ground transportation act was passed in 1965 but not much came from it apart from Budd's Metroliner which couldnt meet expecations, and the UAC Turbo Train still holds the record of the fastest production train in North America at 170.8mph. Outside of that, we didnt really invest much into high speed rail and improving our rail system, outside of a few regions in the country. We continued build highways and sprawling suburbs. Because of this, by the 1990s we were far behind the rest of the developed world in terms of high speed rail. I mean there was the Acela Express, but its more of a high speed service than true high speed rail. And its because of this that the stigma of passenger rail being an outdated form of transport never went a way like it did in other developed countries, and honestly its even worse now since many of the people who were around during the glory days of passenger trains are no longer with us.
But why do we need high speed rail and, hell, better passenger rail? Arent passenger trains slow, dirty, outdated, and a boondogle for democrats to ship immigrants to low income people into the backyard of my mcmansion #notinmybackyard? (okay I promised myself I wouldn't get politcal here but the sad truth is that passenger rail in America is political, with the left being in support of it and the right being against.....its time like these where I do wish we had more than 2 voting options). The reason why need rail in general is due to the fact that options for traveling between cities are limited...outside the northeast. If you want go from Charlotte to Atlanta, Houston to Dallas, or Las Angeles to San Francisco, you either have to drive or fly. For driving, you're limited to one interstate between the cities and you'll mostly be in for a lot of traffic and headaches. For flying, you'll have to get to the airport, go through a painfully slow check in process where they have to make sure you're not terriorst, then you got into the fucking plane where you barely have any room and the window is so tiny, usually dealing with parents who cant shut their kids up unless they have an ipad in their face and Im pretty sure you can tell that I dont particularly like flying. These options can be pretty annoying but they're the best ones you got. Sure you got Amtrak but usually they only run one train between those cities with inconvenient hours and from some of them, Amtrak doesn't even serve them anymore. This is why a third option is needed. High speed rail and upgraded conventional rail can make these corridors competitive for travel, since they're too long to drive to short to fly. And it will be much more environmentally friendly as well which is a urgently needed in order to combat climate change. And one of those cities I mentioned (mainly LA and San Fran) are being connected by High Speed Rail at this moment.......and it wont be done until the 2050s at the latest... Time to talk about California High Speed Rail.
One of the biggest high speed rail projects going on the US right now is the California High Speed Rail, an ambitious project connecting Los Angeles and San Francisco with more connections in the future. You've probably herd of this project and if you have, it probably wasn't good. Despite being voted on in 2008, they havent really gotten anywhere in the past 15 years. Most of the construction is being done on an isolated segment in the San Jose Valley, a flatter and sparsly populated region with mid sizes cities, with little to no work being done in Los Angeles and San Francisco. The San Jose section is set to be done as early as the 2030s and is also over budget. Its this project that I feel has not only ruined the reputation of high speed rail, and added to the poorer perception of passenger rail in general. To most, high speed rail is soon as a boondoggle and a complete waste of tax payer money, and attempts to necromancy a form of transport that hasn't been relevant in the US since 1945. I know not everyone feels this way, but the truth is a lot of Americans are ignorant about passenger rail in general and cant really see the potential for it like most around the world do. And who can blame them! Like I said, the generation that believed in passenger rail, who around during its heyday are long dead, with the eldest generation having grown in sprawling suburbs and with car culture. They never got to experience what life was like before, and so base their world view on what they're used to, and passed on to future generations. Its why any proposals for high speed rail and improvements to rail in general have been shot down because they dont see trains as anything more than old fashioned, because thats what they're used to. That's what they are in most of the country. However, as stated in the title, I believe this can change, and it all starts with Brightline.
Brightline is a private passenger rail operator in Florida running higher speed services between Miami and Orlando. They've been operating since 2018 but it wasn't until September of this year that the Orlando extension opened. This rail line has been making headlines across the country with their sleek modern trains, efficient services, and changing the perception of rail in general. I've been following Brightline for a while and I cant express how blown away I've been. The fact that they got this project off the ground at all is an achievement, and the fact we have trains running at 125mph outside the Northeast is insane! Something like this shouldnt exist in United States. It should've been shot down thanks to NIMBYs and Republican Politicians, but they somehow broke the curse and actually brought a modern fast service that many people enjoy and is actually turning a profit. Its because of this that I have no doubt that Brightline will succeed in this recent project as well. Brightline Florida is good but its not high speed rail. Brightline's Las Vegas project is, and I am 100% confident that this will be the nations first true high speed rail line long before CHSR gets done. And when it does, it will change the perception of high speed rail in America as something that can actually be tangible, and not just a fantasy, and will help jump start and bring more confidence and support to other projects across the US. I think most people will look to Brightline when they think of High Speed Rail, and view the concept in a more positive light that California High Speed Rail will ever do. There has never been brighter future for High Speed Rail in America than there is today and I cant wait to see what's in store for Brightline and other future projects.
Also if you're a republican voter reading this, please dont get offended. Im just stating what I've seen and I know not ever republican thinks to the same
0 notes
lordmanuelo · 9 months
Text
Deseo morir a 300kmh
0 notes
johnstonianjansen · 2 years
Text
What's in a Wheel Code?
Most people believe that a car tire is a tire. Several don't even trouble to check out the files on the aspect of these new rubber friend that gives them more info about what they're purchasing. Reading tire limitations is easy when a buyer receives to know typically the different symbols that manufacturers engrave in the sidewall parts. With a little knowledge, the average person can turn into an experienced in not any time. What is usually a Tire Code? Tire codes provide new tire customers a great package of information. Typically the tire's manufacturer, sort of material, proportions and maximum rate allowances are merely some of the particular quick-reference data that tire codes provide interested buyers. Requirements are universal, plus they offer the exact same information for every single consumer. Through the years, codes have become more difficult due to evolving technologies in car tire fabrication. Tire codes always use the regular metric system regarding measuring, which think it or certainly not, most Americans include unconsciously gotten utilized to. Vehicle Rating The first notice in any tire program code determines the sort of vehicle typically the tire supports. Within the example, P215/65R15, the "P" stands with regard to passenger vehicle. Tyre manufacturers would use an "LT" in order to show that typically the tire supports light trucks, an "ST" for special trailers and also a "T" with regard to temporary or free tires. Width and Height The next set of digits, 215/65 represents a tire's aspect percentage in millimeters. Typically the 215 is the width of typically the tire with 65 symbolizing its elevation, as of proportion of width. A new 215/65 tire is definitely 140mm high or even 65% of 215 (215x 0. 65). Construction Type in addition to Diameter Some auto tires carry other files to help buyers quickly reference typically the type of car tire they're looking for. Letters after the particular rating and dimension data specify typically the tire's design with "R" standing for gigantic, "B" for anchored bias and "D" indicating diagonal bias. The number pursuing the tire's construction kind indicates its radius. Thus, an "R15" tire is a new radial tire together with a diameter regarding 15 inches around. Load Information Each new tire identifies the maximum pounds it can help when inflated. Suppliers write this info directly on the particular tire. However, some manufacturers use some sort of code to present its maximum fill, using a range taken from the particular European Tire and Rim Technical Firm (ETRTO). ETRTO load codes range by 60-125, which suggest maximum loads by 250 kg (550 lb) to at least one, 600 kg (3, six-hundred lb). A tire's maximum load data is especially necessary for trailers or tucks that transport major cargo. Speed Scores This rating can also be marked on every tire and is usually sometimes combined with the load information. The velocity ranking code informs motorists of the optimum speed that tyre can support in maximum load. Inside the example, P215/65R15 87L, the 87 is the ETRTO load code, plus the "L" is typically the tire's speed score, obtained from the ETRTO speed rating table. These ratings selection from "A1" (3mph/5kmh) to "Y" (186mph/300kmh). An "H" score carries an optimum speed of 130mph or 210kmh in maximum load. Path Conditions Markers Winter season storm and hot summer tires are extremely popular in the particular market today for those customers that live in places with extreme weather condition. Sometimes tires may have special heroes marked with them, telling buyers the way they carry out under certain weather condition conditions. Road problem indicators can vary from simple paintings of snowflakes upon the tire to be able to letter symbols, just like M+S, which may remain for mud and even snow. DOT Range Most tires bought from Europe, the U. S. and North america have a Section of Transportation (DOT) number marked on its side. This number gives a new quick reference to the tire's manufacturer, herb number, lot, plus date of production for anyone curious. Knowing how to read tire rules can help customers find the perfect match for auto. Being prepared ahead of entering a tire store improves connection and helps wheel suppliers choose typically the best product to make a consumer's vehicle typically the safest on the particular road.
0 notes
youjustwaitsunshine · 2 years
Text
junge ich wäre bei wetten dass so gut rausgekommen,,, gottschalk so "diese hübsche junge dame [eklige künstlerpause wo das publikum lachen und ich mich einmal um mich selbst drehen soll] wettet, dass sie nur anhand der rennergebnisse eines formel 1 rennens zwischen 2007 und heute, sebastian vettels helm nennen kann den er bei diesem rennen getragen hat" [interview mit mir wo er unglaublich eklig und sexistisch ist und sagt dass ich formel 1 nur mag weil ich die kerle süß finde und ob ich denn den sebastian am liebsten mag] [ich gewinne die wette und kastriere den drecks lustmolch mit gezieltem tritt der stilettos die mir von der produktion aufgezwungen wurden] [die amerikanischen schauspieler die keinen plan haben was da abgeht und die nur ultra confused auf dem hässlichen cremefarbenen sofa sitzen helfen mir im baggerwetten-bagger (wir wetten dass ein bagger mit raketenantrieb 300kmh schafft) zu fliehen]
7 notes · View notes
paulvswrld · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
sie ist ein pro sie gibt head bei 300kmh
0 notes
f1 · 2 years
Text
FIA to act after F1 drivers complain about porpoising affecting health
The FIA is to enforce rule changes that prevent the violent bouncing of cars known as porpoising. Formula One’s governing body was prompted into action after a number of drivers spoke out at last weekend’s Azerbaijan Grand Prix, warning they may end up suffering from long-term health problems if it was not addressed. With many drivers experiencing neck and back pain after Baku, and several noting they found difficulty focusing on braking zones because of the propensity of the bouncing, the FIA has opted to step in under safety grounds, mean their reforms do not require the agreement of the teams. ��The FIA has decided to intervene following consultation with its doctors in the interests of safety of the drivers,” they said. “In a sport where the competitors are routinely driving at speeds in excess of 300kmh, it is considered that all of a driver’s concentration needs to be focused on that task and that excessive fatigue or pain experienced by a driver could have significant consequences should it result in a loss of concentration. “In addition, the FIA has concerns in relation to the immediate physical impact on the health of the drivers, a number of whom have reported back pain following recent events.” Porpoising occurs on straights as cars gain and lose downforce from the ground-effect aerodynamics beneath the floor of the vehicle. It is an unexpected side-effect of regulations introduced before the new season with some teams suffering from it more than others. Mercedes are among those to have had problems and in Azerbaijan underwent the worst of the phenomenon thus far. Lewis Hamilton was barely able to climb from his car and his teammate, George Russell, who is director of the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association, was especially outspoken on the need for the FIA to step in. Ferrari’s Carlos Sainz has also been insistent this is an issue that needs addressing. In Baku, Russell compared it to footballers suffering from cognitive impairment having repeatedly headed a ball. “When they had the massively heavy footballs and there was research done and analysis done that there were health consequences for these chaps who were heading the ball and things were changed,” he said. “F1 is the centre of innovation, there’s no reason why we can’t find a scientific solution for this.” Teams who have not suffered from the problem, such as Red Bull, believe there should not be a rule change because they have gone down a design route with their cars that has left them unable to deal with porpoising. However, drivers have noted that even teams with little porpoising want action, pointing out that the low ride height and stiffness of suspension required under the ground-effect formula produced significant impacts through the body, even without the overt visible bouncing. “The compression, you’re sore and you feel you’re getting squeezed,” said McLaren’s Daniel Ricciardo. “It’s also the frequency. It’s this shaking of the brain and the spine, I don’t think is good, long-term. “I know George has been very vocal about it. They’ve suffered a lot. And I 100% sympathise with him.” The FIA has taken on drivers’ concerns and stepped in, stating it would begin by examining the under-car planks and skids to determine design and wear. The governing body will also, in consultation with the teams, quantify an acceptable level of “vertical oscillation”, or how much bouncing would be deemed to be within safe parameters. via Formula One | The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/sport/formulaone
0 notes