The latest MatPat theory being focused around Vanessa 👁️👁️ Me when I get the giddy hyperfixation tingles whenever anyone brings up my blorbo.
While I don’t think the actual movie version of Vanessa will be revealed to be a robot (solely cause I feel like that’d be too controversial and require too much suspension of disbelief of a choice for the film franchise to make, since it is trying to appeal to a more general audience), I can see that being a possible route that allows the movies to do both Vanessa and Vanny without feeling like doing a 180 of Vanessa’s established character. This version of Vanessa doesn’t listen -> replace her with a new version of Vanessa (Vanny) who will, yknow?
67 notes
·
View notes
FNAF rant-
I’m so tired of Scott being so ambiguous. Idc what people say, it’s not fun. He’s done this for 10 years and it’s gotten us basically nowhere.
I don’t think the books are canon, but Scott should tell his fanbase if they are. The books have been around since 2016 and still no 100% answer. Especially with what he’s said recently.
Most of the stuff that fans classify as “canon” are just theories hat built up over time. Some ARE confirmed and canon, but most aren’t. Which is why there’s so much debate over timelines and theories
Games can be ambiguous but also tell a really good story if you look (portal, undertale, etc), but the way scott tells the story is getting boring and annoying.
If Scott is scared of how FNAF fans will react, then just change it. He’s already done that before with dream theory in FNAF 4. Even if he doesn’t, just do whatever you want, 50% of the fandom doesn’t like him anyway so who cares anymore.
What’s the end goal of FNAF? FNAF is gonna end someday, so what the fuck is gonna go on then? Another 10 years till? Guess we’ll see the end in 2035 when William is back as a real life bunny who gets adopted by the secret child of that girl with the toy animatronics in FNAF 4 8-bit games.
This isn’t really that serious, but I’m just tired. I’ve been a fan since 2014 and I genuinely just want something, anything. Something small.
I’m too old to care this much about a kids game oh lord. Rant over.
36 notes
·
View notes
I don't feel like adding to that post about fnaf and comparing it to HP but
absolutely boycott fnaf if you don't agree with Scott cawthon and how he donates to conservative politicians. Like, yeah no that shit fucking sucks
but it is disingenuous to compare it to JKR and HP, like HP wasn't a worldwide phenomenon compared to FNAF's flashfire popularity and like JKR isn't fuck off rich and has a huge amount of saying power due to her voiced hatred + that fuck-off richness
You don't see Cawthon heading the movement of pro-life shit like JKR is with anti-trans shit. He's making bank off of residuals but he isn't getting personal thanks from the shitheads he donates to. JKR got quoted in parliament ffs
27 notes
·
View notes
I downloaded all of the fnaf books on my phone, now I’ll know all the lore
24 notes
·
View notes
Me reading the Fazbear Frights Novels: wow, I absolutely love this, I mean, the first two aren't that bad
Me reading Count The Ways: *The most audible and disgusted gasp I have ever made in my entire life* that is so vile, what a way to end that book. Anyways-
12 notes
·
View notes
the tendency for people to go 'well (x) person we found out was shitty always made bad art anyway!' is just... so tiring. no rowling wasn't the best writer ever but she was (WAS) a decent and compelling one, there's a reason her books sold. no scott cawthon's games weren't always shitty and dumb, they were simplistic but in a very appealing way, they literally kicked off a whole mini-genre of games with similar mechanics and a wave of animatronic related horror.
you can acknowledge that people are hugely harmful assholes without immediately derailing into 'and everything they made was bad and useless anyway!' it enforces a bad-person-bad-art concept that makes you remain unwilling to examine art and consider negative things about the creators if you like the art or think it's well done, and it hurts and pushes away people to whom that art was important. it's always ok to talk about a work's flaws, including in the context of finding out bad shit about the creators, but a lot of it just feels like... people retro-justifying their dislike of something popular, you know?
50 notes
·
View notes
also "charlie has a good relationship with her father" is something that could ONLY be applied to the original charlie. robot charlie, though her relationship with henry was framed as and probably meant to be perceived in a positive light, was pretty obviously abused by henry and the only reason she was ever created was to be a replacement child. he didn't care about her. he cared about what he wanted her to become.
the fourth closet in general is just plain bad-- but easily the worst thing it does is frame henry as the one in the right, and the only one whose feelings and intentions are valid. meanwhile his daughter, an abuse victim and trauma survivor who very obviously loves and feels like any real person would is constantly the one whose framed as being the problem, and whose told she is not real or deserving of her existence and by the end of the story is made to conform to what the people in her life, specifically her father and boyfriend, want her to be.
like i know henry is fucked up by all the trauma hes endured and thats genuinely understandable, but i cant help but hate him after he became the focus of the books and arguably pizza sim while charlie was disregarded, infantilized, sexualized, and eventually forgotten. she was robbed of the story focus she deserved in favor of the male characters around her, including the man who killed her original self.
15 notes
·
View notes
i did not have learning that scott cawthon wrote official matpat mpreg in a fnaf book through a game grumps episode on today's bingo card but here we are
11 notes
·
View notes