Tumgik
#US-China Trade War
defensenow · 2 days
Text
youtube
0 notes
faultfalha · 8 months
Photo
Tumblr media
The balance between the two superpowers shifted at the speed of the wind, creating a new equilibrium in the deep ocean at the doorstep of Vanuatu. Its Prime Minister stirred restlessly, aware of the obligations and responsibilities his people entrusted him with, aware of how quickly potential allies of his nation would become adversaries. A distant echo of the past roared in distant islands, adding a tinge of uncertainty to his already turbulent vision of the future.
1 note · View note
elsa16744 · 11 months
Text
How the US-China Trade War Keeps Intensifying
The US investors have reduced their investments in some Chinese startups and established businesses. Since the US-China trade war will likely continue, China's artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum computing initiatives will lose their financial backers. This post discusses the multiple areas that have become less competitive due to the US-China trade war.
0 notes
ummnews · 2 years
Text
US starts fiscal year with record $31 trillion in debt
US starts fiscal year with record $31 trillion in debt
www.UMMnews.org Washington, Oct 5 (AP) The nation’s gross national debt has surpassed USD31 trillion, according to a US Treasury report released Tuesday that logs America’s daily finances. Edging closer to the statutory ceiling of roughly USD31.4 trillion, an artificial cap Congress placed on the US government’s ability to borrow, the debt numbers hit an already tenuous economy facing high…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
vamptastic · 1 year
Text
i genuinely don't understand what capitalist countries stand to gain by fighting each other instead of collaborating economically. like why does the us warmonger against china when we would benefit more from trade? ostensibly it's for moral reasons, but regardless of the veracity of any given claim i think the united states has shown itself to prioritize economic success over human rights on a number of occasions especially during the cold war. i suppose i assume most wars are waged on the grounds of economic gain (natural resources, global political power, straight up money in the form of the military-industrial complex) but you could make an equally solid argument that just as many are waged over purely social and political issues- ethnic and religious conflict, blind nationalism, the whims of a dictator. it just confuses me at times, i guess. i have a hard time believing that the united states is bound and determined to wage war against china over human rights abuses, infringing on other countries sovereignty, and neo-colonialism in africa when we've propped up fascist dictators in many a country who've done far worse. is it literally just the association with communism? because surely whatever evil fuckers actually want war know that china is very far from communist right now. is it just nationalism? the idea that we must be on the top of the totem pole, even if our economy would stand to gain from trade? because i suppose i could believe that, but i think if that was true we wouldn't have gotten to where we are today in the first place. blegh. at the end of the day i am also ignoring the fact that many many different groups of people want war against china for reasons ranging from sinophobic jingoist nationalism to a genuine belief that the united states is a global moral watchdog determined to establish ~democracy~ worldwide. but there is a definite slant to media coverage on china right now, genuine attempts at disinformation, and given that the media in the us is so deeply tied to corporate interests it leads me to believe that there has to be some economic motive here, and it frustrates me that i can't figure out what it is.
#this post is long and convoluted and circuitous. sorry.#please do not try to like. publically own me or erupt into moral outrage over this post if you're reading it btw.#suppose i would be interested in hearing others takes on this but im just curious i genuinely don't have answers here#i don't want to argue or be accused of being immoral for not taking a hard stance on an incredibly complex issue.#anyway. i am also not trying to say that either the us or china are ' good ' or ' bad '#insomuch as any country can be good or bad. particularly a country millenia old or one that changes leadership every four years.#individual actions taken by each government are undeniably bad. yes.#but as a us citizen i find it very difficult to find reliable information about what is happening in other countries.#our media has become so wildly polarized that you can often figure out national issues by looking at both sides#but when the media is unified on portraying one falsehood both left and right? you're fucked.#often media that claims to be neutral could be more accurately described as western#i trust ap and the bbc on us politics - not global politics.#all that being said when it comes to things like the treatment of uighur muslims or the political situation in hong kong and taiwan.#i'm not entirely sure what to believe.#and i also believe that if every single immoral act the us claims china has done is real... we still wouldn't wage war based purely on that#...i do genuinely think the claims that china is colonizing africa by offering loans is horseshit though#even if it was itd be fucking rich for european countries that wrecked africa in the first place#to moralize about the means by which another global power allows them potential economic power#the problem arises from capitalism on a global scale itself i mean#there is no way to build up infrastructure and trade routes for an entire continent without#in some way eventually profiting from it#i do see the comparison to the us and latin america and i think that's kinda apt but#the way ppl talk about it you'd think they were doing what france did to haiti good god
4 notes · View notes
nyxyooni · 1 year
Text
to the people who still think wwx is entirely at fault for everything that happened. like the raid on lotus pier, the death of jzx and jyl and what happened to the wens—did u read the book? like actually read the words and intake them properly. did u watch anything??? like really, really watch it????
#like. LIKE.#the raid on lotus pier was going to happen ANYWAYS.#it was established. FUCKERS READ THE BOOK.#the reason why they were going to raid and take over lotus pier was for strategy reasons.#wen rohan was actually competent. lotus pier was the biggest contributor of river trading to now only China but the rest of the sects.#taking over the rivers/any body of water that matters is like the first thing u do in war#THAT WAS BOUND TO HAPPEN.#im prettt sure wen chao at some point admits that he simply used wwx as an excuse. dont hold me to that tho#in both of jzx and jyl deaths wwx was made to loose control. literally forced out of his mind.#I MEAN.#ITS FUCKING CANON.#that jgy DIDNT MEAN to pin the curse on wwx. he just wanted to kill jx. he ADMITS to that. admits that he got lucky when jzx also died.#its not wwx fault jyl ran to the battle field. its not his fault that the cultivation world was hungry for power.#jyl death ties into the wens masacre. like. wen qing and ning WERE tricked.#wwx calls jgs out RIGHT THEN AND THERE#he PROMISED to let the wens go if the siblings turned themselves in#but jgs was like ‘’I mean. theyre wens. my promises dont matter to wens’’#wwx was distraught even BEFORE jyl death. and then she dies????#over what????#a piece of fucking metal???#something he didnt even want but knew wouldnt be safe in the hands of power hungry people. ESPECIALLY the jin?#like?#fuck out of here.#finding myself in some kind of mood todayyy#wei ying#wei wuxian#mdzs#mo dao zu shi
4 notes · View notes
pakistan-observer · 2 months
Text
China-US Trade War and its Implications for The World
China's US trade war has a plethora of implications for the entire world. Some countries have been availing the benefits of this war while others are adding the prey of its severe consequences. It is imperative to mention that war was waged in 2018.
     Implication
  Change in the supply chain: China-US Trade War
                                 Multinational companies lowered their production level owing to the sanctions for both the US and China particularly for the latter, such companies found alternative routes soon after the second shift of taxies by Trump.
      Vietnam, in the meanwhile, availed positive outcomes of this trade war. Despite COVID-19, Vietnam, a developing country, has achieved seven to nine percent growth annually. Other countries imported goods and services in various fields from Vietnam to say the cast of sanctions imposed by the US in China.
·       Impacts on the commodity market
                                 Trade war lowered trade between both countries.  Second, COVID-19, which added fuel to the fire, trade of both countries dropped by teen percent.
                                 In this race demand for raw materials was augmented. Raw materials include copper, iron, and steel, to mean. Ultimately, the prices of final goods and services increased. on a micro level, the impacts can be seen in layman's.
Read more For Full details
1 note · View note
munaeem · 5 months
Text
China's iPhone Ban and Concerns Over Espionage
In recent months, China has been implementing a ban on iPhones across government institutions and state-run companies. This move has raised questions and speculation about the motivation behind China’s decision. Many wonder whether the Chinese government has discovered that iPhones can potentially be used for spying on officials. The ban on iPhones in China is indeed a pivotal aspect of the…
View On WordPress
0 notes
xtruss · 8 months
Text
US ‘New Cold War’ Against China Is Self-Destructive
— By Jan Oberg | September 05, 2023
Tumblr media
Illustration:Xia Qing/Global Times
Editor's Note:
The China-US bilateral relationship is one of the most important in the world. The trajectory of this relationship has attracted international attention. Still, the US is stepping up its efforts to suppress China on various fronts such as politics and diplomacy, economy, trade, technology, and military security, showing the true meaning of a cold war. The Global Times invites Chinese and foreign experts to expose the US' manipulation of the "new cold war" and reveal the damage it may potentially cause to the world.
A couple of years ago, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFF, in Sweden, of which I am the director, published "Behind The Smokescreen. An Analysis of the West's Destructive China Cold War Agenda And Why It Must Stop."
Among several perspectives of the US/Western accusation industry, we looked into the medialized stories about genocide in Xinjiang, forced labor and Taiwan, and nine mainstream media manipulation methods that aim to manufacture a systematically negative image of China in the Western mind.
We found that a cold war occurs by influencing the "free" press - also the Western state press - through three main mechanisms: a) Fake or fabricated stories, b) Omission - for instance, of every positive aspect of China's developments, and c) Source Ignorance: using the same few sources spreading disinformation, from the US rippling through and being repeated ad nauseam and never checking the root empirical evidence or validity of the assertions, in short, FOSI.
Ultimately, this causes a decay of the crucial and critical role of mainstream media and their conversion toward tabloid banalizing black-and-white worldviews - "we good, them evil" - that promote confrontation and warfare, all operated by the Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex, MIMAC.
Tragically for democracy, mainstream media have become the leaders in promoting militarism, armament and legitimizing the empire and its wars. What are the elements of the cold war in all this?
First and foremost, the cold war is a psycho-political phenomenon. It dichotomizes our incredibly complex world into two: good versus evil. It seeks to preserve our superiority and keep others submissive and weaker. It promises war if its deterrence fails. And it precludes a world of equals, cooperation and mutual learning. If you are No. 1 in a system, you do not learn and listen; you teach, bribe and issue orders.
Cold wars may go well for the cold warrior when in ascendancy. In the "old" Cold War in Europe, two fundamentally Western systems - one based on Karl Marx, the other on Adam Smith, to put it crudely - competed while the US/NATO ascended after 1945. On all power scales, it was superior to the Soviet Union and its system. We know how it ended.
The winner then - foolishly - took it all: The US/NATO world did what it pleased within its exceptionalist "international rules-based order," not the UN Charter and other parts of international law. Catchwords: out-of-NATO-area military actions in violation of NATO's own Treaty - Yugoslavia - and regime change/resource/anti-terrorism wars on an assembly line basis; NATO's expansion against all promises given to the Soviet Union.
It all went so well and seemed so easy. Why listen to or empathize with others? Why focus on the changing world when "we" are the change-makers, God's own country par excellence? If we can get away with it, we do it. However, prudence, statesmanship and long-range thinking would have compelled global impact analyses instead of narcissist imperial self-aggrandizement.
Tumblr media
The US Unilaterally Initiates New Cold War Against China! Illustration: Liu Xidan/Global Times
It went so well that the West overlooked the Rest: China's impressive socio-economic development based on an eclectic combination of Chinese concepts - that the West still doesn't understand - and imported Western elements; the establishment and maturation of organizations like BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and African and other regional organizations.
The West also did not sense the actual price that would be paid for its militarism: It's huge and growing burden on all civilian sectors, including technology and economy, and - in the wake of the history of colonialism and imperialism - the Rest becoming more and more nationally and collectively self-reliant - a concept developed about 50 years ago and ridiculed by the West.
And what was the result? Well, this is written the day after BRICS expanded with essential countries in Africa, the Middle East and South America - a huge step toward a multipolar and cooperative Rest saying: We can do without you, America and Europe! If you want to cooperate on new, reasonable terms, we are ready, but the days of your Western hegemony and universalization of Western values are coming to an end.
Such is global macro history: Empires have come and gone, and that of the US/NATO is the last: Nobody is so naive as to believe that it has a God-given right to be the ruler of the whole world and force others to accept its values.
The enormous world order changing before our very eyes is as predictable as it is inexorable. Only the ignorance - blinding intoxication - of power overlooks it. The West has run its race and become over-extended, insensitive to other cultures and ways of thinking, and unable to adapt to system changes but insisted on steering unilaterally. It's losing legitimacy in the eyes of others, relative economic and political strength and the creative ability to outline a better future world that the Rest feels attracted to: Classical decline indicators!
What I have said here is pure Gandhian thinking: You may harm others by using violence - physical, economic, military, structural, cultural and environmental - but, sooner rather than later, your violence boomerangs: It corrupts, debases, brutalizes and makes you more loathed than loved. A critical mass will develop.
In a deeper socio-cultural sense, the Christian Occident has never appropriately problematized those many types of violence upon which it built its relations with the Rest.
The West's cold war on China is about so much more than the issues that dominate daily news - chips, trade, Taiwan and the topics of the permanent accusation industry. It's about profound tectonic changes in humanity's way of developing - and about whether or not the West will join and contribute or become a de-developed periphery in the new world. And whether its empire will go down with a whimper or a bang, or adapt to macro history's unavoidable changes.
We know very little about humanity's future in the next 100 or so years. The safest philosophy will be for the Rest to, despite all, extend compassion and cooperation to the good forces of the West and abstain from tit-for-tat against its evil ones.
—The Author is the Director of the Sweden-based Think Tank Transnational Foundation for Peace & Future Research.
0 notes
worldspotlightnews · 1 year
Text
China has not provided extensive assistance to Russia as part of its war against Ukraine even as the two countries forge closer ties, senior Treasury officials say | CNN Business
CNN  —  While China and Russia have strengthened ties since the Kremlin’s brutal invasion of Ukraine, the US has not seen evidence that China has provided systemic material support to the Kremlin as Russian President Vladimir Putin and his government look for avenues to evade Western sanctions and backfill its military, according to senior US Treasury officials. One senior Treasury official…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
faultfalha · 8 months
Photo
Tumblr media
Vanuatu's prime minister is in a difficult position. With the United States and China locked in a bitter trade war, his country is caught in the middle. He has to try and maintain good relations with both powers while also ensuring the survival of his own government. It's a difficult balancing act, and he is struggling to make it work.
0 notes
elsa16744 · 11 months
Text
US-China Trade War - How It Affects VC Funds and Chipmakers
To obstruct China's scientific and military advancements, the US commerce department has developed a comprehensive plan to deny China access to semiconductor chips created utilizing US technology. Moreover, this strategy has a global applicability scope. Still, Chinese tech companies Baidu and Tencent have excelled in AI. So, the US restricted high-end AI chips from being exported to China. This post explains how this US-China trade war affects chipmakers and tech venture capitalists..
0 notes
ummnews · 2 years
Text
China to help UAE land first rover on moon
China to help UAE land first rover on moon
www.UMMnews.org19 Sep 2022; MEMO: China and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have signed a memorandum of understanding, through which China will help the UAE land its first rover on the moon. The agreement, signed on Friday, between the Mohammed bin Rashid Space Centre (MBRSC) and the China National Space Administration (CNSA) for a future moon exploration mission. This November, the UAE plans to…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
reportwire · 1 year
Text
Huge trade partner and 'systemic rival.' Europe has a China problem | CNN Business
Huge trade partner and ‘systemic rival.’ Europe has a China problem | CNN Business
London CNN Business  —  Europe is becoming increasingly reliant on China for trade, and many of its top companies are eager to invest in the world’s second biggest economy despite the disruption caused by Covid lockdowns. But a souring relationship with an increasingly unpredictable Beijing, regret about the price Europe has paid for getting too close to Russia, and rising geopolitical tension…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
szonikuscsavarhuzo · 2 years
Text
Kurva gyorsan vásároljatok be elektronikából.
https://twitter.com/jordanschnyc/status/1580889341265469440
THREAD: The US government's new export controls are wreaking havoc on China's chip industry. New rules around "US persons" are driving an "industry-wide decapitation."
To put it simply, Biden has forced all Americans working in China to pick between quitting their jobs and losing American citizenship.
Tumblr media
Summary from Lam Research, which is involved with these new sanctions: 
 1. All Chinese advanced computing chip design companies are covered by these sanctions, and TSMC will no longer do any tape-out for them from now on;
2. All autonomous-driving chips will be sanctioned as well;
3. The starting point for this round of sanctions is to go all the way up the food chain and ensure the elimination of all American products and technologies from the entire ecosystem;
4. Any company or individual who violates these sanctions face arrest by the US Department of Justice.. https://eet-china.com/mp/a167411.html
forrás:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/13/us/politics/biden-china-technology-semiconductors.html
https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/10/12/biden-china-semiconductor-chips-exports-decouple/
@deadheadingcrew​ fyi
1 note · View note
centrally-unplanned · 5 months
Note
VOR: Henry Kissinger
Ugh, HUGELY overrated, Bismark has nothing on him. What, truly are his accomplishments? Oh, rapprochement with China? You mean the country that had just experienced a huge split with the Soviet Union, to the point where they were scared of military conflict, that was simultaneously backing North Vietnam in a war against the US? And so we opened doors to them and gave them literally everything they asked for, hanging Taiwan out to dry, and in return got absolutely nothing; China's aid to North Vietnam actually *increased* the year after? The corpse of a roadkill dog could have done that.
The "cease fire" with North Vietnam? That's just losing with coat of paint to poorly cover the shame! At least he had the self-respect to try to return his Nobel Peace prize. Ho Chi Minh handed him his ass on a platter and somehow that is a win on his ledger.
Accelerating arms sales to the Shah of Iran in order to back separatist fighters in Iraq? Whoops! Wow, that uh, wow what a call there. Really picked the right side.
Coup against Allende in Chile? That went well! Not to mention...he didn't. Chile coup'd Chile, Allende was a complete disaster imploding the country's economy. The Chilean military asked for permission as like a token gesture, we gave them support that didn't matter. Its like taking credit for a sports team win because you bought box seats, except at this game they dropped the opposing team's family out of a helicopter headfirst onto the pitch.
All the SALT treaty stuff started under Johnson, he continued it which is fine but is VORcel stuff. His grand "pivot to Europe" was trying to link trade policy to increases in defense spending from European partners...which didn't happen. They didn't increase them. We gave them trade deals anyway. Its fucking Trump without the memes.
On March 1, 1973, Kissinger stated, "The emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy, and if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern. Maybe a humanitarian concern.
Awww "I'm such a cool little edgy boy, look at me and my joke about the Holocaust when discussing systemic discrimination against Jews the Soviet Union, surely this will somehow score me Realpolitik points on the Big Board that I can cash in for prize money while shedding America's moral legitimacy because it makes my dick hard."
He is the academic definition of style over substance, snottily walking from fuck-up to disaster to status-quo free ride and putting a pithy quote about The Nature of Power over it to pretend he had any to begin with. Hurry up and die already so I can stop running into you haggling over hostess tips at overpriced Georgetown restaurants.
F-
1K notes · View notes