#im sure the live action atla will be ok but i know it will never come close to the original just by watching the trailer | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

bloodbenderz · 3 years

Note

humaniterations (dot) net/2014/10/13/an-anarchist-perspective-on-the-red-lotus/ this article from oct 2014 is very dense — truly, a lot to unpack here, but I feel like you would find this piece interesting. I would love it if you shared your thoughts on the points that stood out to you, whether you agree or disagree. you obv don’t have to respond to it tho, but I’m sending it as an ask jic you feel like penning (and sharing) a magnificent essay, as is your wont 💕

article

i know this took me forever 2 answer SORRY but i just checked off all the things on my to do list for the first time in days today so. Essay incoming ladies!

ok im SO glad u sent me this bc it’s so so good. it’s a genuinely thoughtful criticism of the politics in legend of korra (altho i think its sometimes a little mean to korra unnecessarily like there’s no reason to call her a “petulant brat” or say that she throws tantrums but i do understand their point about her being an immature and reactionary hero, which i’ll get back to) and i think the author has a good balance between acknowledging like Yeah the lok writers were american liberals and wrote their show accordingly and Also writing a thorough analysis of lok’s politics that felt relevant and interesting without throwing their hands up and saying this is all useless liberal bullshit (which i will admit that i tend to do).

this article essentially argues that the red lotus antagonists of s3 were right. And that’s not an uncommon opinion i think but this gives it serious weight. Like, everything that zaheer’s gang did was, in context, fully understandable. of course the red lotus would be invested in making sure that the physically and spiritually and politically most powerful person in the world ISNT raised by world leaders and a secret society of elites that’s completely unaccountable to the people! of course the red lotus wants to bring down tyrannical governments and allow communities to form and self govern organically! and the writers dismiss all of that out of hand by 1. consistently framing the red lotus as insane and murderous (korra never actually gives zaheer’s ideas a chance or truly considers integrating them into her own approach) 2. representing the death of the earth queen as not just something that’s not necessarily popular (what was with mako’s bootlicker grandma, i’d love to know) but as something that causes unbelievable violence and chaos in ba sing se (which, like, a lot of history and research will tell you that people in disasters tend towards prosocial behaviors). so the way the story frames each of these characters and ideologies is fascinating because like. if you wanted to write season 3 of legend of korra with zaheer as the protagonist and korra as the antagonist, you wouldn’t actually have to change the sequence of events at all, really. these writers in particular and liberal writers in general LOVE writing morally-gray-but-ultimately-sympathetic characters (like, almost EVERY SINGLE fire nation character in the first series, who were full on violent colonizers but all to a degree were rehabilitated in the eyes of the viewer) but instead of framing the red lotus as good people who are devoted to justice and freedom and sometimes behave cruelly to get where theyre trying to go, they frame them as psychopaths and murderers who have good intentions don’t really understand how to make the world a better place.

and the interesting thing about all this, about the fact that the red lotus acted in most cases exactly as it should have in context and the only reason its relegated to villain status is bc the show is written by liberals, is that the red lotus actually points out really glaring sociopolitical issues in universe! like, watching the show, u think well why the fuck HASN’T korra done anything about the earth queen oppressing her subjects? why DOESN’T korra do anything about the worse than useless republic president? why the hell are so many people living in poverty while our mains live cushy well fed lives? how come earth kingdom land only seems to belong to various monarchs and settler colonists, instead of the people who are actually indigenous to it? the show does not want to answer these questions, because american liberal capitalism literally survives on the reality of oppressive governments and worse than useless presidents and people living in poverty while the middle/upper class eats and indigenous land being stolen. if the show were to answer these questions honestly, the answer would be that the status quo in real life (and the one on the show that mirrors real life) Has To Change.

So they avoid answering these questions honestly in order for the thesis statement to be that the status quo is good. and the only way for the show to escape answering these questions is for them to individualize all these broad social problems down into Good people and Bad people. so while we have obvious bad ones like the earth queen we also have all these capitalists and monarchs and politicians who are actually very nice and lovely people who would never hurt anyone! which is just such an absurd take and it’s liberal propaganda at its best. holding a position of incredible political/economic power in an unjust society is inherently unethical and maintaining that position of power requires violence against the people you have power over. which is literally social justice 101. but there’s literally no normal, average, not-politically-powerful person on the show. so when leftist anarchism is presented and says that destroying systems that enforce extreme power differentials is the only way to bring peace and freedom to all, the show has already set us up to think, hey, fuck you, top cop lin beifong and ford motor ceo asami sato are good people and good people like them exist! and all we have to do to move forward and progress as a society is to make sure we have enough good individuals in enough powerful positions (like zuko as the fire lord ending the war, or wu as the earth king ending the monarchy)! which is of course complete fiction. liberal reform doesn’t work. but by pretending that it could work by saying that the SYSTEM isnt rotten it’s just that the people running it suck and we just need to replace those people, it automatically delegitimizes any radical movements that actually seek to change things.

and that’s the most interesting thing about this article to me is that it posits that the avatar...might actually be a negative presence in the world. the avatar is the exact same thing: it’s a position of immense political and physical power bestowed completely randomly, and depending on the moral character and various actions of who fills that position at any given time, millions of people will or won’t suffer. like kyoshi, who created the fascist dai li, like roku, who refused to remove a genocidal dictator from power, like aang, who facilitated the establishment of a settler colonial state on earth kingdom land. like korra! she’s an incredibly immature avatar and a generally reactionary lead. i’ve talked about this at length before but she never actually gets in touch with the needs of the people. she’s constantly running in elite circles, exposed only to the needs and squabbles of the upper class! how the hell is she supposed to understand the complexities of oppression and privilege when she was raised by a chess club with inordinate amounts of power and associates almost exclusively with politicians and billionaires?? from day 1 we see that she tends to see things in very black and white ways which is FINE if you’re a privileged 17 yr old girl seeing the world for the first time but NOT FINE if you’re the single most powerful person in the world! Yeah, korra thinks the world is probably mostly fine and just needs a little whipping into shape every couple years, because all she has ever known is a mostly fine world! in s1 when mako mentions that he as a homeless impoverished teenager worked for a gang (which is. Not weird. Impoverished people of every background are ALWAYS more likely to resort to socially unacceptable ways of making money) korra is like “you guys are criminals?????!!!!!” she was raised in perfect luxury by a conservative institution and just never developed beyond that. So sure, if the red lotus raised her anarchist, probably a lot would’ve been different/better, but....they didn’t. and korra ended up being a reactionary and conservative avatar who protected monarchs and colonialist politicians. The avatar as a position is completely subject to the whims of whoever is currently the avatar. and not only does that suck for everyone who is not the avatar, not only is it totally unfair to whatever kid who grows up knowing the fate of the world is squarely on their shoulders, but it as a concept is a highly individualist product of the authors’ own western liberal ideas of progress! the idea that one good leader can fix the world (or should even try) based on their own inherent superiority to everyone else is unbelievably flawed and ignores the fact that all real progress is brought about as a result of COMMUNITY work, as a result of normal people working for themselves and their neighbors!

the broader analysis of bending was really interesting to me too, but im honestly not sure i Totally agree with it. the article pretty much accepts the show’s assertion that bending is a privilege (and frankly backs it up much better than the original show did, but whatever), and i don’t think that’s NECESSARILY untrue since it is, like, a physical advantage (the author compares it to, for example, the fact that some people are born athletically gifted and others are born with extreme physical limitations), but i DO think that it discounts the in universe racialization of bending. in any sequel to atla that made sense, bending as a race making fact would have been explored ALONGSIDE the physical advantages it bestows on people. colonialism and its aftermath is generally ignored in this article which is its major weakness i think, especially in conjunction with bending. you can bring up the ideas the author did about individual vs community oriented progress in the avatar universe while safely ignoring the colonialism, but you can’t not bring up race and colonialism when you discuss bending. especially once you get to thinking about how water/earth/airbenders were imprisoned and killed specifically because bending was a physical advantage, and that physical advantage was something that would have given colonized populations a means of resistance and that the fire nation wanted to keep to itself.

i think that’s the best lens thru which to analyze bending tbh! like in the avatar universe bending is a tool that different ethnic groups tend to use in different ways. at its best, bending actually doesn’t represent social power differences (despite representing a physical power difference) because it’s used to represent/maintain community solidarity. like, take the water tribe. katara being the last waterbender, in some way, makes her the last of a part of swt CULTURE. the implication is that when there were a lot of waterbenders in the south, they dedicated their talents to building community and helping their neighbors, because this was something incredibly culturally important and important to the water tribe as a community. the swt as a COLLECTIVE values bending for what it can do for the entire tribe, which counts for basically every other talent a person can have (strength, creativity, etc). the fire nation, by contrast, distorts the community value of bending by racializing it: anyone who bends an element that isn’t fire is inherently NOT fire nation (and therefore inherently inferior) and, because of the physical power that bending confers, anyone who bends an element that isn’t fire is a threat to fire nation hegemony. and in THAT framework of bending, it’s something that intrinsically assigns worth and reifies race in a way that’s conveniently beneficial to the oppressor.

it IS worth talking about how using Element as a way to categorize people reifies nations, borders, and race in a way that is VERY characteristic of white american liberals. i tried to be conscious of that (and the way that elements/bending can act in DIFFERENT ways, depending on cultural context) but i think it’s pretty clear that the writers did intend for element to unequivocally signify nation (and, by extension, race), which is part of why they screwed up mixed families so bad in lok. when they’ve locked themselves into this idea that element=nation=race, they end up with sets of siblings like mako and bolin or kya tenzin and bumi, who all “take” after only one parent based on the element that they bend. which is just completely stupid but very indicative of how the writers actually INTENDED element/bending to be a race making process. and its both fucked up and interesting that the writers display the same framework of race analysis that the canonical antagonists of atla do.

anyway that’s a few thoughts! thank u again for sending the article i really loved it and i had a lot of fun writing this <3

#this is 2.1k words LMFAOO #asks #analysis #do i have an analysis tag?#crit #lok crit

184 notes · View notes

softestbabyblue · 7 years

Text

I was tagged by @orsonkraennic Thank you so much <3333

1. Coke or Pepsi: Gimme all the Coke pls 2. Disney or Dreamworks: I really love Disney, especially all these old movies i grew up with ! Aristocats and The Lion King........... (ive been listening to a lot of disney songs these days............ ) 3. Coffee or Tea: tea !! Coffee is way too bitter for me 4. Books or Movies: books ! lmao i dont need movies 5. Windows or Mac: Windows 6. DC or Marvel: neither, i never really got into any of these two 7. X-Box or Playstation: playstation !!. 8. Dragon Age or Mass Effect: uh what ? :/ 9. Night Owl or Early Riser: Well, im both ? i have no problem with standing up early, and i can stay up until late too so-..... 10. Cards or Chess: Cards !!! I love card games :D 11. Chocolate or Vanilla: C H O C O L A T E 12. Vans or Converse: i think ill go with converse 13. Lavellan, Trevelyan, Cadash, or Adaar: *finger guns* 14. Fluff or Angst: give. me. all. the. angst. GIVE IT TO ME GIVE ME THE TEARS AND THE HEART BREAKING THINGS THIS SHIT IS GOOD ITS THE BEST HHHHHHHHHHHHHH 15. Beach or Forest: i loooove forests, but i really love the ocean too...... ill go with the forest tho 16. Dogs or Cats: i love both, but since i own two cats, ill chose them 17. Clear Skies or Rain: i really love the rain, but when im outside clear skies are cool. buT THE BEST THING IS THE SKY AFTER IT RAINED WHERE THE CLOUDS MOVE AND THE LIGHT SHINES THROUGH. GOOD SHIT RIGHT THERE 18. Cooking or Eating Out: Cooking ! i mean, being eaten out sure is nice, but pls gimme food 19. Spicy food or mild food: my white ass stomach cant take spicy food, so yea. its ok if its a little spicy, thought. 20. halloween/samhain or solstice/yule/christmas: i dont really celebrate any of these (: 21. If you could have a superpower, what would it be? uuhhhh........ i think shape shifting would be cool. but i actually just want to be all super human, i.e. faster and stronger than normal humans 22. would you rather forever be a little too cold or a little too hot: im always a little too hot, so yea .... id rather be a little cold tho 23. Animation or live action? animation ! 24. Paragon or renegade? ? :/ 25. Baths or showers: showers ! baths are cool, but so,,, hot 26. Team Cap or Team Iron Man? neither. 27. Fantasy or sci-fi: fantasy ! i think 28. do you have three or four favourite quotes, if so what are they: I DO. “My heart is beating like its lonely, like theres nothing else inside of me” “tell me, Atlas. what is heavier: the world or its peoples hearts?” “pretty and deadly, a serpent in my mouth, i hold my tongue in desperation. the beauty, it has taken my mind from me.”

29. Youtube or Netflix: youtube. i dont have netflix and i dont need it 30. Harry Potter or Percy Jackson: harry potter ! i really like percy jackson, but i havent read it,... 31. When you feel accomplished: uhhh when i achieve my goals ? idk man 32. Star Wars or Star Trek: im not into either 33. Paperback or Hardback? well, almost all of my german books are hardback, and almost all of my englisch books are paperbacks ?? i like hardbacks, but i usually order the paperback books (theyre cheaper heh) 34. Horror or rom-com? i cant watch horror since im a lil baby (: 35. TV Shows or Movies? movies 36. What is your happiest memory? oh.... i have no idea ? it might be one of the times i was at my favorite place. maybe the one time when the pond was frozen and i was walking on it, listening to classical music and watching the sun set. i felt so at peace with the world 37. who was your first fictional/celeb crush? hhHHHHHHHHHH i dont know which one was the first one, but it was either Inuyasha, Nagoya Chiaki or Danny Phantom.... 38. an unpopular harry potter opinion you have? Lucious Malfoy might have been a good father.

thank you so much, again, i love being tagged *cries* bless your soul. i love you. *kiss*

i tag: @psycho99-universe @hotasstrology @rioshiny and everyone else who feels like doing this !

#YAS BITCH #TAG GAME #TAG MEME #ABOUT ME #ME

3 notes · View notes