#lr shrimp | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

mama-tumblz · 5 years

Note

I don't question the expertise of cb4tb, but what concerns me more is the continuing denials for the sake of PR and how they embolden trolls to attack shipper blogs. It appears to me no one in PR has any regard for the toll it takes on shippers. IMO it is cruel and beyond manipulative to pit one section of the fandom against another. Starz PR is slimy at best IMO. The principals compliance in such a tactic bothers me no end. Call me naive IDC.

Awww...I hear what you’re saying. I really do. I’m sick to death of it too. So sick that I can’t even work up any enthusiasm for the new season. How sad is that!? And judging by the body language and the fact that she slipped past those fans outside of Kimmel, I think Cait hates it too. I like that you use the word ‘compliance’ when I’ve seen so many accuse her of ‘conspiring’. There’s a huge difference. Yes, Cait, and Sam too, are complying...with the wishes of their employer, with the small print of their contracts, with something that we aren’t privy to but have to accept, like it or not, and while serial denials is a most annoying form of PR, the trolls don’t need it. They’ve been emboldened to attack our blogs by lesser things...by Sam’s forehead in Paris, by every time we laughed at Sam and his Blonde Of The Week’s attempts at looking coupley...this promo is just the latest thing. In fact, the bigger the receipt the louder they rage, so based on the number of angry anons lately, I’d say they see what we see but don’t dare say so. I will agree with you that Starz PR is slimy. These are some low moves. But I posted a while ago about how the studio and the stars see fandom. It’s all demographics to them and you really must not take it personally. They aren’t pitting one side against the other because they don’t like me or you or anyone in particular in the fandom. We aren’t each represented by a different coloured push pin on a corkboard in Chris Parnell’s office. For some reason that makes sense to someone important, they are determined to push the fact that the two leads of this show are not a couple in real life. They are actors and she is engaged to Someone Else. The group they’re targeting with this will read that or see it somewhere along their way to Episode 1 and believe it. Some, like us, won’t. Some will be offended. Some will walk away. Some will continue to ship. When the dust settles, more viewers is the goal.

Try to remember too that this all took place between the time of the Australia Unplugged Tour and mid March. For all we know they aren’t paying much attention to it right now. That would be a good idea, for the sake of their own sanity. Cait didn’t have a giggle over breakfast with LR and Chris Parnell about the Parade article and then head off to make googley eyes at Sam at their next promo, whatever that was, then answer KDS in the “so you’re engaged, have you ever lusted after a costar?” game before sitting cuddled up beside Sam at NYCC, then whip off another issue of I’m Engaged last night before pasting an order of fries over his giant shrimp, then getting up this morning to do another impromptu interview announcing her engagement and dissing the 0.1% of fans who can’t be happy for her. That would be mean. These denials happened all on the same day and within a week of Sam having to fly to LA for one last red carpet date. I can almost picture Cait feeling determined, if not ecstatic, about pulling these off, knowing that he was home, Skipper’s contract was coming due, and this announcement of hers was going in the files to be their cover. I agree with those who’ve said that they don’t think going in she ever meant for it to be used as the main thrust of Season 4 promo. I bet they drank a lot of celebratory whisky that last week of March after a hellish stretch at work, and it feels like the celebrations continue. They’ve both been bolder and a little more rebellious ever since.

Oh, and yes...never question the expertise of @cb4tb The lady knows her marketing and has dumbed things down for me more than once.

123 notes · View notes

obsessivesassenach · 6 years

Note

P1 I guess this theory only goes if you think SC are together but I see Sam making outrageous statements sometimes to 'claim' Cait. I think he gets jealous, we've seen examples of that a few times. He probably doesn't like the plan to have her publicly be engaged to someone else. "Pearl Necklace" for instance. Most people's reaction is that it's inappropriate of him to say if she's engaged to someone else, especially with his grin as he said it. He probably knows that too. Instead of keeping it-

P2-clean he makes it dirty & relays a joke to something that's only given to someone in a sexual way. Sam w/ shrimp talk. Granted Cait started it but Sam directly asked her more detail/kept it going. On Twitter. Very strange for the both of them if she's engaged to someone else. Idk if it's subconscious or what but there's more examples I could give where he says stuff & the only perception it leads people to is that they've at least hooked up, probably more. You don't see him talking about-

P3 last part-SPY costars like that. He has tons of other women costars & work relations, KM, MK as costars. LA, LR as work networking. We know he knows how to be a gentleman. W/ Cait 90% of interviews/comments are ungentlemanly to an engaged costar. Call me crazy IMO it's Sam trying to keep his relevance in relation to her & people's minds correlating them being together. Idk if it's a testosterone thing or what but he didn't let up when he was w/ MM & he hasn't let up now that she's w/ T.

I guess you don’t have your own tumblr and would like me to publish your thoughts. I really don’t know and I know I’ll never know. I don’t have the inside scoop and can only guess and I don’t like to base conclusions on guesses. So I just sit back and watch and sometimes I enjoy the ride and sometimes I get motion sickness. Where’s the barf bag? It’s a roller coaster or a carousel or just a crazy ride going round and round and round. It never ends. It’s theater. It’s #tv.

45 notes · View notes

7seasjewelry · 3 years

Photo

Peacock Mantis shrimp AKA Harlequin mantis shrimp, Painted mantis shrimp, Clown mantis shrimp . An agile predator, it prefers gastropods, crustaceans, and bivalves, and will repeatedly deliver a punch until it cracks the to the exoskeleton of its prey until it breaks. It is reported to have a "punch" of over 50 miles per hour, the fastest recorded punch of any living animal. The acceleration is similar to that in a .22 LR bullet fired from a handgun (accelerations of over 100,000 m/s , with each strike packing 1,500 N of force. . The speed of a strike causes cavitation bubbles to form. When those bubbles pop they release a large amount of heat, temporarily raising temperatures to near those at the surface of the sun and further weakening the armour of their prey. That is just the beginning! Next time I will post some interesting facts about their eyes & sight. . Reposted from @marcvanderpoel . . . . . . . . . . . . ゴルゴニアンエビ。 #shrimpphotography #OdontodactylusScyllarus #MantisShrimp #ゴルゴニアンシュリンプ #トガリモエビ #水中マクロ #uwmacro #SnootPhotography #UnderwaterPhotography #MuckDiving #peacockshrimp #macrophotography #UWMacro #underwaterphotography #underwatermacro #underwaterimages #underwaterphotographer #unterwasser #フィリピンダイビング #カエルアンコウ #ダイビング #スキューバダイビング #подводнаяжизнь #дайвинг #подводныймир #unterwasser #unterwasserfotografie #Tauchen #Plongée #Buceo #uwphotography #подводнаяжизнь https://www.instagram.com/p/CQeaqOnBeqt/?utm_medium=tumblr

0 notes

weddingsbooksnwine · 5 years

Photo

Comparing photos of shrimp and grits I took using an S9Note in my car. My original photo with slight editing on the right and with #LR (Lightroom tutorial on the left) I feel like I did pretty good as there is little difference between the two. Getting my photography game on point! . . I DO Weddings by Sheri 💙💍💐 www.idowedbysheri.com . . #confidence #selftaught #crushingit #photography #amateurphoto #alwayslearningsomethingnew #practicemakesperfect #startsmallthinkbig #foodpics #foodporn #foodpic #nomnomnom #shrimpandgrits #lightroomtutorials #foodie #southerncuisine #howedoitinthesouth (at Orlando, Florida) https://www.instagram.com/p/BxVGRg2gD9n/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=1fjm1r4k9shy2

#lr #confidence #selftaught #crushingit #photography #amateurphoto #alwayslearningsomethingnew #practicemakesperfect #startsmallthinkbig #foodpics #foodporn #foodpic #nomnomnom #shrimpandgrits #lightroomtutorials #foodie #southerncuisine #howedoitinthesouth

0 notes

hella-free-space · 7 years

Note

Do you feel like in your honest opinion that dustin's fish tanks on YouTube is trustworthy place to take advice from about fishcare/tanks?

From what I’ve seen so far?I believe that Dustin from Dustin’s Fish Tanks is a great place to go if you wanna know about aquarium plants or planted tanks!there were a few things that I saw that I didnt necessarily like tho >.>*however* i feel like I haven’t seen enough of his content to give a fair answer to your question.if youre looking for a place to learn about fish stuff on youtube, i recommend Aquarium Coop, SolidGoldAquatics, UaruJoey, KGTropicals, and LR Bretz does shrimp stuff i think :p//I’ll come back to give a better answer on Anon’s Dustin-question in a few days; it’s finals week and i cant afford to binge a ton of dustin’s vids over the next two days

4 notes · View notes

iholidayvacation · 5 years

Text

Catch and Cook ARMADILLO & LEPROSY! Ep14 | GRASS TORPEDOS! South Texas Survival Challenge

Catch and Cook ARMADILLO & LEPROSY! Ep14 | GRASS TORPEDOS! South Texas Survival Challenge The goal of The Wilderness Living Challenge Season 3 survival series is to GAIN or MAINTAIN body mass living only on 100% WILD FOODS! In this episode we track down armadillo in South Texas to turn it into a meal catch and cook style using a very simple armadillo recipe. Woodobo SPICE (FOR SALE): http://bit.ly/2Dnh7pc BOOKMARK THE FULL PLAYLIST (2 Episodes per Week): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDg2Qmw9pKieXN2wWRF625WHH5YTYylMb Episodes will run every TUESDAY and FRIDAY 10 a.m. EST. Paypal Donations: http://bit.ly/2WVHBHx t-shirts: http://bit.ly/2MZyXmo Wes S: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCl25wLho_X2y72NS8xMN9sQ Bob Hansler: https://www.youtube.com/user/horsebackbob Paypal Donations: http://bit.ly/2WVHBHx t-shirts: http://bit.ly/2MZyXmo Unlike Naked and Afraid, ALONE, or Survivorman, there is no limit to the tools we are allowed to use. Living off just WILD foods is harder than you think! In this episode we track down armadillo in Texas using a catch net, as well as a 22 LR. I will teach you how to stalk, sneak, and catch them with a simple catch net. We look at the armadillo habits, their eyesight, terrain, habitat, and hearing and burrows. Catching armadillo is more challenging than you think! This is a how to catch an armadillo! We hunt FERAL hog too. We fish for catfish, alligator gar, long nose gar and drum, crawfish, crawdads, or yabbies, ghost shrimp, bluegill, rio grande perch, armored catfish, flathead catfish, blue catfish, alligator, freshwater clams, leopard Frog. All wild foods are on the menu! We seek out wild edibles including prickly pear cactus pads or nopal, cactus fruit or tuna, wild onions, mulberries, wild grape, Texas persimmons, pecan and anacua, mulberry, tasajillo, turks cap, yucca pods, cats briar, oion, chili pequin, duck weed, ground cherries, desert hackberry. Season 2 of The Wilderness Living Challenge: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDg2Qmw9pKieZifUoxhoiv6DqqKc6oGMP MEDIA Facebook: http://bit.ly/2BLdYhu Website: http://bit.ly/2Slghng Grohmann Knives: www.gknives.com #survival #bushcraft #wildfoods Use code "WoodBeard" to get 10% off ASAT Camo: www.asatcamo.com https://youtu.be/OV0CoGVIeUA อยากมีอยากหารายได้เสริมหลักแสน หลักล้าน คุณทำได้ งานลงทุนออนไลน์ ใช้โซเชี่ยล100% สร้างอยากมีอยากหารายได้เสริม 6หลักใน3เดือน7หลักใน1ปี เรียนรู้วิธี จากประสบการณ์จริง หาธุรกิจน่าทำ ที่ น่า ลงทุน ใน ปัจจุบันอยากมี “ธุรกิจน่าทำ ที่ น่า ลงทุน ใน ปัจจุบัน” เริ่มต้นยังไงดี. เริ่มต้นธุรกิจ ที่ น่า ลงทุน ใน ปัจจุบันทำอาชีพ หาธุรกิจส่วนตัว อยากมี “ธุรกิจส่วนตัว” เริ่มต้นยังไงดี. เริ่มต้นธุรกิจน่าทำส่วนตัว ทำธุรกิจออนไลน์ การทําธุรกิจบนอินเตอร์เน็ตธุรกิจน่าทำอิสระบนโลกงานออนไลน์ทำที่บ้าน รายได้พิเศษออนไลน์เข้าถึงทุกกลุ่มเป้าหมาย เป็นธุรกิจน่าทำที่มีความอิสระในตัวสูงมาก มีข้อดีมากสำหรับการลงทุนใน ธุรกิจออนไลน์ คุ้มค่า. Line: Love-Quotes โทร 094-3399030

#https://youtu.be/OV0CoGVIeUA goo.gl/K6FTL3

0 notes

trentteti · 6 years

Text

The Morning Cometh: The July 2018 LSAT Recap

July LSAT takers: where were you on February 8, 2014? Maybe this was a simpler, pre-LSAT time in your life, and you were trying to figure out the newfangled “Stories” feature on Snapchat, while listening to Katy Perry and Juicy J’s “Dark Horse,” on your way to see the surprisingly good The Lego Movie, after watching the opening ceremonies to the twenty-second Winter Olympics games in Sochi? Or maybe, on the other hand, you were taking the February 2014 LSAT. If you were in the second camp, some may say you had an advantage over your social media-using, trap-pop-listening, Scandinavian toy-movie-watching, winter-sport-viewing counterparts.

Or, where were you in September 2017? Were you wondering how anyone could possibly enjoy that dreadful new Taylor Swift single that was skyrocketing up the charts, but mounting a defense of the scary clown movie to your friends? Or were you among fellow chosen ones who observe the Sabbath on Saturday, taking the LSAT given on Sundays for the folks of your stripe? If you were in the latter group, some may say you had a sizable advantage over your gentile peers.

That’s because the test LSAC gave out yesterday on July 23, 2018 was — as had been widely suspected — was simply an old “nondisclosed” test. Specifically, the old February 2014 test. This test was also administered to Saturday Sabbath observers in September 2017. So I guess the intrepid folks who thought they were signing up for something brand new with the July LSAT were actually just exploring well-worn ground.

But this shouldn’t be that surprising — in fact, reusing “nondisclosed” exams is precisely why LSAC makes some exams “nondisclosed” in the first place. When LSAC announced — sort of last minute — that it would add a July exam after already expanding the number of LSATs administered each year, it wasn’t like they could suddenly hire way more qualified psychometricians to devise, test, and equate three more exams each year. It would be so much cheaper and easier to simply draw from the well of old February exams. So it’s understandable that they would do this. For years, this is what they’ve done for Saturday Sabbath observers, for people who had to take the test on a different day because of an emergency at the test center, and for international test takers (allegedly, this February 2014 test was used for test takers in Asia in September 2016, as well).

Now, it is a little bold to re-use the same test maybe four times in the span of just over four years. And, if you had a hard time with the July test — like a lot of people reportedly did — you may be worried that a group of test takers who already took the exam when it was first administered were given a distinct advantage. Maybe so much of an advantage that it could affect the curve of this exam, and your chances of scoring well. But honestly, how many people took the February 2014 and then the July exam yesterday? Almost no one spends almost four-and-a-half-years studying for the LSAT.

Even if someone did, what are the odds that they remembered anything specific or helpful about that test? Can remember any specific Snapchat Story you made in 2014? Can you repeat a single line Juicy J rapped in “Dark Horse”? What was the name of the main character in The Lego Movie? You’d have to admit that those should be more memorable pieces of cultural ephemera than an LSAT. And if you can’t remember those, there’s no way someone who took a four-hour test — and never saw that test again — would have a strong enough memory to greatly benefit from taking the test once.

The Sabbath test takers from September 2017 and the test takers in Asia from September 2016 took the test more recently, true, but how many of them retook the July test? LSAC, as far as I can tell, doesn’t publish the number of tests administered to people who observe Saturday Sabbath, but it did publish the total number of exams administered in Asia in the 2016-17 LSAT “year.” In that year, there were a total of 2,286 test takers in Asia. That’s about 2.6% of all test takers that year. Typically about a third of all test takers take the exam in September. So let’s assume that about 762 people took the September exam in Asia. Even if everyone who took the exam in Asia in September 2016 also took the July test in North America this year and even if they remembered enough from the September 2016 exam to have a distinct advantage — two “ifs” that are roughly the size of the Asian continent itself — they would still represent only about 4.7% of the 16,338 people who were registered to take the July test. They would have at most a negligible effect on the curve.

So … yes, LSAC got a little lazy and re-used a test. And unfortunately they re-used what was previously considered to be a particularly difficult exam. But fortunately, I don’t think the former is going to influence the latter. In other words, I don’t think the fact that this test has been administered before made this test any less difficult for anyone. So I would expect the curve to very forgiving — potentially allowing test takers to miss as many as 13 questions and still earn a 170. And I don’t think the fact that maybe a handful of the July test takers already saw the exam is going to change that fact.

But it was a difficult test by all accounts, so let’s go over what we’re hearing about it, section-by-section.

Logical Reasoning

We almost never get a clear picture of a Logical Reasoning section immediately after the test, for understandable reasons. Test takers are inundated with 51 short questions (sometimes as many as 77 if they get a third LR section as the experimental section), about all manner of topics. It’s tough to remember anything about these sections, other than maybe a fleeting memory of an errant question or two.

We’ve heard tales of questions about fossilized birds and dinosaurs, about Chinese coins and Quebecois cards, and about shrimp economics. So you know, just the classic topics we all know about and read about all the time. It’s tough to gather anything specific about question distribution, though.

Reading Comprehension

For the Reading Comprehension section, the first passage was about the effect of French Revolution on women’s rights — a topic the LSAT has covered before, way back in October 2001. We’re hearing the second passage was the comparative passage about the aesthetics of viewing sports — whether we appreciate athletes in the same way we appreciate works of art. Does the violence Russell Westbrook inflicts upon a rim inspire us in the same way that violence Jackson Pollack inflicted upon a canvas?* The third passage was a physics passage about Karl Popper and “theories of everything.” This passage is the consensus pick for the most-difficult passage. It was dense, but not impossible for most test takers. In all likelihood, test takers who took the time to understand the most important parts of the passage — like the number of arguments and the author’s role — but didn’t waste time trying to develop a theory of “everything” in the passage — had the easiest time with it. Finally, there was a passage about Belizean common law and its effect on indigenous Belizeans’ rights. A passage about indigenous peoples’ rights on the LSAT? Not exactly an un-Belize-able development.

*As an aside, I really wish I could have seen this passage — as a lifelong skateboarder, I have a lot of experience with this topic, since analyzing other skaters’ tricks in aesthetic terms is pretty much all we do. We assess the style with which they perform their tricks, their ‘fits, the spots they chose to skate at. There’s even an art historian and curator who runs a popular Instagram account where he analyzes skaters’ clips with the same exacting, and brutal, terms he would bring to bear upon work of art. It’s tough to imagine a passage more squarely in my (polyurethane) wheelhouse.

Logic Games

Finally, Logic Games, which colored pretty much everyone’s opinion of this exam. This was a hard logic games section, by all accounts. These games were time consuming and difficult, according to most people. Most of all, the third and fourth games.

The third game involved five art instillations, installed over the period of three months. So it’s like an overbooked ordering game, wherein some months will feature more than one art installation. But then there was another variable thrown in — whether the installations would be supervised or not — that necessitated the construction of another tier. So it sounds like it was an overbooked tiered ordered game, which is a rare — and difficult — combination.

The fourth game was a seldom-seen circular ordering game, last observed in 2003. You know, those games where a group of people are sitting around a circular table, where the last person is still next to the first person, making the game annoyingly complicated? In this version of that fun ditty, we had delegates and translators sitting around table, and it sounds like the game mostly involved figuring out whom each delegate or translator could sit between.

These two games, taken together, made a lot of people feel like the test went poorly. Games have a way of coloring your perception of a test, more than any other part of the LSAT. They’re the most memorable parts of the exam, and you typically know, as you’re doing a game, whether it’s going really well or really poorly. But you should also be aware that one or two games won’t necessarily have a devastating effect on your score. Two games may have as few as 11 or 12 questions between them. Which is just a little over 10% of a scored LSAT. Not a small chunk of the LSAT, to be sure, but they shouldn’t be the only things you think about when you assess your performance, when you’re deciding whether or not to cancel. Especially if you nail the other two games — which in this exam were about city workers and grouping players into departments at a store.

Final Thoughts

So this wasn’t a new LSAT, but that didn’t make it any less difficult for many test takers. If you were among those who felt great about it, take a well-deserved victory lap. If you feel like it didn’t go well, you still have a few options.

First, you may be considering whether to cancel your score. LSAC’s official cancellation policy can be read here. According to LSAC, you have until 11:59 pm EDT on the sixth day after the exam to cancel using your LSAC account. To translate that out of unintelligible bureaucratese for your poor, fried brain, you have until Sunday at 11:59 pm Eastern to cancel. Sleep on it. Heck, take the next few days to think it through. Take a look at this video, if you need a little help.

youtube

Before canceling, you should also be aware that nearly every law school will simply use your highest LSAT when constructing your academic index, or whatever calculation it uses to assess you as an applicant. Now, schools will see every score you got on the LSAT; however, the vast majority of schools won’t hold having multiple LSAT scores against you to a significant extent. For most test takers, our recommendation is to choose to receive your score, just on the chance that you’ll be happy enough to with the score that you don’t have to study for the next exam.

Second, LSAC announced a a new policy for July test takers who signed up for the September exam as well. For those test takers, LSAC is offering a full refund of the September registration fee if they decide they don’t need to take September test after receiving their July scores. To take advantage of this refund, you just need to email LSAC by August 17. Scores are due out on August 10, so you’ll have a week to make that decision. However, if you cancel your July score, you won’t be eligible for this refund.

So congratulations to all who finished this July LSAT, the brand new test that wasn’t at all new. We hope at the very least, you are enjoying a break from the LSAT. If you decide you need to take it again, we’ll be here to help.

The Morning Cometh: The July 2018 LSAT Recap was originally published on LSAT Blog

#July LSAT #LSAT #morning cometh #trent teti #lsat

0 notes

andytwoslow · 6 years

Text

Saturday morning my buddy Ron invited me to join him at the Pomona NHRA Winternationals. As luck would have it, I had an open schedule for once and the kids didn’t have a busy day so I was able to get a hall pass and hang out at the race track all day.

Turns out Ron has a hook up with one of the teams so we got to hang out in a hospitality tent for LRS/Team Wilkerson Racing. I haven’t been to a race in a long time, and never a drag race, so this was basically an all new experience for me.

Pomona isn’t that far from us, just a little outside of OC, I think it took longer to get from the parking lot to the pit than it did to get there in the car. From the parking lot you could hear some of the cars warming up the tires and running qualifying rounds – that awesome BUUWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH noise that all drag cars make, some more deafening than others. I haven’t watched drag racing on TV for a long time, so I didn’t know any of the names. The only ones I recognized were John and Courtney Force, mostly because the Force shop is close by.

Ron apparently has a friend who works for one of the main sponsors of the team, so we had a hospitality tent right next to the team’s pit area, got to watch them tear down and rebuild this car between runs while sucking down free beers and a pretty good lunch of skirt steak, pot stickers, and cajun shrimp. I was expecting hot dogs and sodas so seeing a grown-up lunch was total bonus.

Once the team had the car back together they fire it up to make sure everything works I suppose and holy shit balls that thing is loud.

The stands in Pomona are pretty nice, actually, but to the uninitiated it’s a little challenging to figure out where to get in to sit in the right section. We had reserved seats and inadvertently went in the wrong tunnel and had out fight our way over to right section. On our way, top fuel and funny cars were qualifying so I caught a video. I had another but it was so short IG wouldn’t post it.

Holy shit balls #racing #orangecounty #pomona

A post shared by Two Slow OC (@twoslow_oc) on Feb 10, 2018 at 2:59pm PST

Our team ended up running a 3.886 @ 327.43 mph. Man- If you’ve never been to this, you can feel it in your soul. It was so loud it made my scalp tingly. I’ve been trackside when Baja Trophy trucks go roaring by and that was nothing compared to this. It must something to do with asphalt and the stands, but man, so loud. Hearing protection is imperative. I got video of the LSR/TWR last run, but he’d already qualified pretty well, so shut it down early to avoid damage or worse.

I snapped a bunch of pics while walking around and in the stands, enjoy.

Trail 90!

Big Bear Chopper for sale, $12k – a bargain

tractor pull thing

I can’t even think the last time I had a Mello Yello – let alone a camo one

spare tires in the hospitality trailer

putting on the body

flywheel

i forget this guy’s name

staging was right behind us

our driver

replica of Shirley Muldowney’s car

thsi corvette won an award for ‘best engineering’

studebaker body, i’m pretty sure

this girl was guide the cars back after their burnout

LRS/TWR lining up

John Force in the blue/white

Pomona Winternationals 2018 Saturday morning my buddy Ron invited me to join him at the Pomona NHRA Winternationals. As luck would have it, I had an open schedule for once and the kids didn't have a busy day so I was able to get a hall pass and hang out at the race track all day.

#drag racing #nhra #pomona #winternationals

0 notes