Dc x idea 124
Sam and Danny do a student exchange program. Danny was Volvontold to do it by mr.lancer who got his parents to agree. Sam’s parents were more then happy to force her to do it. The school she was being sent to had a Wayne.
Tucker would be staying back in amity to help Valarie with the ghosts.
The two amity Parker’s quickly caught attention at the transfer school. The two kept to themselves and wanted nothing to do with it. At one point they were caught bad mouthing the justice league. That caught attention especially from Damian Wayne.
Danny: it’s not that we don’t like hero’s
Sam: it’s that they claim to give a shit but don’t! That hotline is bs. Nothing comes from it.
Damian: they deal with world ending crisis not small time crime from a town in Illinois.
Danny: duh. Dude we don’t call when box ghost is stealing all the shoe boxes. Or when spectra did her hospital gig yet again. Then the time lunch lady decided it was mandatory meatloaf Monday and-
Sam: *elbowing Danny* we’ve only called with potential world ending threats. Like when the ghost king yoinked our town into the ghost zone and threatened to destroy earth without the return of his ring. Then the time undergrowth was going to feed our entire town to his plants then move on to the world.
Danny: don’t forget technus. Know how last month how phones, tvs and most electronics only were displaying a green face screaming of taking over the world. It only lasted like what 2 mins for you guys. But man that was a rough week for us.
Sam: Tucker got a hold of someone just for them to laugh In his face despite offering proof and video footage.
Sam/Danny: we’ll keep bad mouthing the justice league. Deal with it.
Sam: besides we have a much better heros then the justice league. Two of them who actually care.
376 notes
·
View notes
[ID: Two panels from Dungeon Meshi. The first scows Senshi clutching his face as tears start to spill out of his eyes, saying, "I've always... always wanted to have this soup one more time." He's not wearing his helmet in this panel, so his face is unusually visible, detailed and vulnerable. The second panel shows himself as a youngster, surrounded by his old mining team, all smiling at each other, one of them rubbing Senshi's head. Modern-day Senshi continues, "Thank you. All of you. Thank you." End ID.]
Holy shit. I anticipated some tragic backstory from the "I must feed the young ones" panels, but what I'd guessed was that Senshi might have become so devoted to cooking and eating literally whatever because he'd previously survived a famine and had seen children starve to death. I did not expect him to have been the child who was the sole survivor of a doomed travel party, one of whom was determined to feed Senshi first because he was the youngest, and that Senshi has lived with the fear of having inadvertently committed cannibalism by eating stew that he'd never quite known the contents of. I'm happy for him that Laios deduced and confirmed for him that it was griffin meat, that he was able to taste the meal that saved his life once more and remember the friends he lost. Seriously, I'm crying, and also earnestly relieved that while his backstory is pretty dark, it's not the type of fucked up I'd been preparing myself mentally for.
58 notes
·
View notes
alright i have a mild dilemna that i need advice on
on my course we have to post these weekly self-reflection things responding to the themes of the week's class and some questions about it. i posted last week's and yesterday the course convenor replied to it in a way that implies i was wrong (in my SELF reflection) and just generally misunderstands my point/takes it in bad faith. i've shown these posts to others on the course and they agree that my original post adressed the things her reply asks about and that she has misinterpreted me, in quite a "cheeky" way
my issue now is: do i reply and try to explain myself better? or is it better to just let it go?
i don't want to dig myself in deeper if she's really opposed to my viewpoint, but at the same time i do feel like i answered the questions thoroughly in the first place and the things she's accusing me of aren't fair
14 notes
·
View notes
Since NRC has a lot of famous students, hostage situations are quite common, so much so that there is a section of the guidebook on the matter.
In the latest incident, a couple of bandits tried to kidnap Ruggie to get to Leona.
(There were plenty of other targets, like Epel or anyone else in Savanaclaw, but the criminals didn't want to fight a bulky teenager and were afraid of the Pomefiore student).
Fortunately, the bandits couldn't find the perfect time to strike, since Ruggie was always accompanied by a student, usually the Octotrio or Leona himself, even Lillia and Malleus at one point.
What they didn't know was that Sam's friends had warned him about the plan and he sent a note in the school chat, meaning the entire school already knew and even helped catch the criminals later on.
And if Leona punched them in the face for trying to mess with him and his emotional support hyena, nobody said a thing.
42 notes
·
View notes
One person I talk to from a different country said that the interview questions from my school are weird and don't make much sense to ask. Like they are more assessing how good you are at lying and even if it's to measure how well you talk and have an open personality, that's not even the most important thing about dentistry or second or third.
😶
I just don't get the US system for this. It's very odd and indirect and almost sneaky in an unfair way.
3 notes
·
View notes
so many things about school pisses me off so badly bc all of it feels so pointless and stupid but for some reason no one who can actually do something about it agrees
2 notes
·
View notes
Sometimes I forget how bad a lot of first year film students story ideas are.
There's a new employee at the theater I work at, I knew he was a film student so I wanted to know what kind of scripts he likes to write (another employee and I were discussing the story ideas we had). He told me about a script he had been working on for his class that he was very proud of.
Trigger warning for : drug addiction, murder, cannibalism, racism
Paraphrasing him, the short was about a " homeless black female crack addict" (already off to a bad start in my opinion) that is lured to a rich family's mansion with the promise of food and a bed for a night, while there she is bitten by the couple's five year old son (who is named Billy, the only character given a name in his retelling) the family is just overall very creepy and it's very clear early on that they plan on eating this woman. She is then kidnapped, chained to a bed and forced into detox before making a failed escape. The short ends with her corpse being eaten by the family.
There was a lot wrong with the story in my opinion (the race element being called out but seeming to have no bearing on the plot, the twist being extremely easy to spot, stereotypes being used without really dissecting them, etc.). The one that I pointed out to sort of test the waters for how he'd handle criticism was the events leading up to the kidnapping. He noted, multiple times, that the woman was "tweaking" from withdrawal and repeating that she wanted to leave. Only to just go to sleep in the creepy obvious cannibal mansion. I suggested that maybe he should be a bit more clear as to why she wanted to stay, when by his own retelling she was creeped out and wanting to leave.
He told me I didn't know what I was talking about, and that nobody had any issue what-so-ever with his story before.
I figured that continuing the conversation was a waste of time, so I told him he should go on break.
6 notes
·
View notes
oh god I'm taking a uni course on contemporary swedish queer literature and aaaaaaaaaaah too many of the books are just so. insanely boring
I think it's my moral duty to write a bunch of queer fantasy just to liven up the options
5 notes
·
View notes