#supermemo

[d0nutzgg]

How AI Can Help You Study

Studying for a test can be a daunting task, but with the help of AI, it can be made easier and more efficient. Here are a few ways you can use AI to help you study for a test:

Use flashcard apps with AI: There are various flashcard apps available that use AI to help you study more efficiently. These apps use machine learning algorithms to personalize your study sessions based on your strengths and weaknesses, which can help you to focus on the areas where you need the most improvement. Some of these apps are:

Quizlet: This app uses machine learning algorithms to personalize study sessions based on your strengths and weaknesses. It also provides detailed analytics on your performance, which can help you to identify areas where you need to focus more.

Anki: Anki uses spaced repetition to help users memorize information more efficiently. It uses an algorithm to determine the ideal time for a user to review a flashcard based on how well they know the material.

Flashcard Elite: This app uses AI to personalize flashcards and to provide feedback on your performance. It also has a feature that generates flashcards based on your reading materials, which can save you time when creating flashcards.

SuperMemo: This app uses a combination of spaced repetition and active recall to help users memorize information more efficiently. It also uses AI to personalize the study schedule based on the user's performance.

Cram: This app uses AI to personalize flashcards and provides analytics to help users identify areas where they need to focus more. It also has a feature that generates flashcards based on your reading materials, which can save you time when creating flashcards.

Use AI-powered tutors: Many online tutoring services now use AI to provide personalized instruction and feedback. These tutors can analyze your performance and adjust the difficulty of the material to match your level. Some of these AI tutors are:

Knewton: This company provides adaptive learning software and personalized instruction to students of all ages. The system uses machine learning algorithms to analyze student data and adjust the difficulty of the material to match their level.

ALEKS: This AI-powered tutor uses adaptive learning algorithms to personalize instruction for students in math, science, and engineering. It provides students with a personalized learning path and gives them immediate feedback on their performance.

Carnegie Learning: This company provides an AI-powered math tutor that uses machine learning algorithms to personalize instruction for students in grades 6-12. The system provides immediate feedback on student performance and adjusts the difficulty of the material to match the student's level.

My Study Life: This AI-powered tutor app uses machine learning algorithms to personalize instruction for students in various subjects. It tracks the student's progress and provides personalized study plans and feedback.

Smart Sparrow: This company provides an AI-powered adaptive learning platform for higher education. The system uses machine learning algorithms to personalize instruction and provide immediate feedback on student performance.

Use AI-powered study aids: Some AI-powered study aids can help you to focus and stay on task, by using techniques such as gamification and spaced repetition.

StudyBlue: This app uses AI to personalize flashcards and study plans for students. It also uses gamification to make studying more engaging and fun.

Studybot: This AI-powered chatbot helps students stay on task and focused by providing reminders and motivation throughout the study session.

Brainly: This AI-powered learning platform provides instant homework help and study aids for students. It uses machine learning algorithms to personalize instruction and provide immediate feedback on student performance.

Socratic: This app uses AI to provide step-by-step explanations for math and science problems. It also uses machine learning algorithms to personalize instruction and provide immediate feedback on student performance.

Querium: This company provides an AI-powered study aid for students preparing for standardized tests such as the ACT or SAT. The system uses machine learning algorithms to personalize instruction and provide immediate feedback on student performance.

Lumosity: This app uses AI to create personalized brain training exercises to help users improve their cognitive skills.

Use AI-powered text summarization: AI-powered text summarization can help you to quickly digest large amounts of information and make it easier to retain the important concepts. Some of these apps include:

Gensim: This is a Python library that uses machine learning algorithms to automatically summarize text. It can be used to extract important information from large amounts of text data.

SummarizeBot: This is an online tool that uses natural language processing to automatically summarize text. It can be used to quickly digest news articles, research papers, and other long-form text.

TextRank: This is an algorithm that uses a graph-based approach to summarize text. It can be used to extract the most important sentences from a piece of text.

OpenText: This company offers a range of AI-powered text analysis tools, including a text summarization module that can be used to automatically summarize large amounts of text data.

SEMANTIC: This company offers a natural language processing platform that includes a text summarization module, which can be used to automatically summarize text in multiple languages.

Hugging Face: A platform that provides pre-trained models and tools for natural language processing, it includes some models for text summarization, such as BART and T5.

Use AI-powered language learning apps: If you are studying for a test that requires knowledge of a foreign language, there are many AI-powered language learning apps that can help you to improve your language skills. These include:

Duolingo: This app uses AI to personalize language instruction and provide immediate feedback on student performance. It also uses gamification to make learning more engaging and fun.

Rosetta Stone: This company offers a range of language-learning software that uses AI to personalize instruction and provide immediate feedback on student performance.

Babbel: This app uses AI to personalize language instruction and provide immediate feedback on student performance. It also uses speech recognition technology to help users improve their pronunciation.

Lingodeer: This app uses AI to personalize language instruction and provide immediate feedback on student performance. It also includes a feature that helps users improve their listening and speaking skills.

FluentU: This platform uses AI to personalize language instruction and provide immediate feedback on student performance. It also includes a feature that helps users improve their listening and speaking skills by using real-world videos.

Lingvist: This app uses AI to personalize language instruction and provide immediate feedback on student performance. It also includes a feature that helps users improve their vocabulary.

By using AI to help you study, you can make the most of your time and improve your chances of success on your test. Remember, AI is not a replacement for human effort and hard work, but it can be a useful tool to augment your study routine.

#AI #Studying #TestPreparation #Education #Learning #AIinEducation #flashcards #studyaids #textsummarization #languagelearning #personalizedlearning #adaptivelearning #edtech #edutech

[wordbrain-cheats-student-nd]

wordbrain cheats student

⭐ ⏩⏩⏩️ DOWNLOAD MOD - LINK 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Are you stuck in WordBrain Puzzle Game? Here is the complete unofficial cheat sheet with answers to resolve each level of WordBrain game. in this cheat app, You will find all answers for WordBrain game, our app will help you to finish all levels. Cheats for WordBrain is a free unofficial app. Wordbrain Flamingo Level 10 Answers | Cheats for Wordbrain Wordbrain Flamingo Level 10 Answers. Oxford Collocations Dictionary for Students of English Cheats for WordBrain Word Game Developed by MAG Interactive ~ All Answers to Cheat Free. Precio: Gratis ; Tamaño .APK: MB ; Versión actual: ; Nombre de paquete: ; Categoría: Libros y obras de consulta. the supervisor will control the student & their attendance & absence & the parent will control & track their children and all the updated statuses. Cheats for WordBrain Themes - Answers & Hints. Referencia. i-Components iOS-Components Development Components. Referencia. SuperMemo (old). Logos Quiz Gouci App Answers, Cheats, Solution for All Levels in the game on iPhone, iPad, Android, and other.

[varesearch]

TỪ NGHIỆP DƯ TRỞ THÀNH CHUYÊN GIA TRONG BẤT KỲ LĨNH VỰC NÀO NẾU ÁP DỤNG 5 PHƯƠNG PHÁP TỰ HỌC "LẠ MÀ CHẤT" NÀY.

(Elon Musk cũng đang áp dụng, tại sao bạn không thử ngay?)

Trong kiến thức kinh tế ngày nay, việc học tập xuyên suốt cuộc đời là quan trọng hơn hết. Cùng lúc đó, kiến thức ngày càng giá trị hơn và dễ tiếp cận hơn, đặc biệt là trong bối cảnh Khoa học Công nghệ phát triển. Đó là lý do việc học là sự đầu tư tốt nhất của chúng ta.

Cho dù chúng ta đang học một ngôn ngữ mới hoặc cải thiện các kỹ năng lập trình của mình, có một số cách giúp chúng ta có thể trở thành người học tốt hơn, bắt đầu với cách chúng ta học.

Sau đây là cách chúng ta có thể tiếp tục kéo dài việc học mỗi ngày.

01 - SỰ LẶP LẠI

Theo cách nào đó, gần như tất cả chúng ta cố gắng nhớ hoặc cố nhồi nhét vào phút cuối. Hóa ra, học nhiều phiên và trải rộng bài học hay "lặp đi lặp lại cách biệt" là một cách hiệu quả.

John Medina, tác giả của Brain Rules, gọi sự lặp đi lặp lại là cách hữu hiệu nhất để gieo các ký ức vào n.ã.o b.ộ.

Có thể bạn quyết định trong năm 2019 sẽ học tiếng Pháp. Để tận dụng sự lặp đi lặp lại khoảng cách, bạn có thể bắt đầu tạo một lịch trình xem xét. Mỗi tối, dành ra thời gian để học, xen kẽ giữa từ vựng và ngữ pháp. Giới hạn thời lượng của những phiên đánh giá này vào khoảng 30 phút, hoặc tùy vào thời gian bạn có thể tập trung mà không bị xao nhãng.

Tiếp theo, thiết lập một cách để lưu trữ và tổ chức thông tin. Phần mềm như Evernote và SuperMemo là những công cụ tuyệt vời cũng như dễ dàng truy cập.

Cuối cùng, bạn sẽ cần số liệu để theo dõi tiến trình của mình. Đo lường lợi ích của bạn sẽ thúc đẩy bạn tiếp tục.

Trong khi thiết lập một hệ thống đòi hỏi thời gian, việc lặp lại khoảng cách giúp chúng ta lưu giữ thông tin và có thể giảm thời gian học tập.

02 - SUY TƯ

Năm 2016, chuyên gia năng suất Scott Barry Kaufman phát hiện rằng 72% mọi người có ý tưởng sáng tạo khi đang tắm. Bản thân tôi là một phần của nhóm đó.

Những ý tưởng khi tắm này thường xuất hiện khi chúng ta đang làm một hành động không liên quan, vì n.ã.o b.ộ của chúng ta tạo ra các liên kết giữa các thông tin chúng thu nạp.

Tôi cũng có những ý tưởng tuyệt vời nhất trong (hoặc sau) khoảng thời gian riêng tư. Đó là một lý do cho việc tôi tin vào việc cho nhân viên thời gian thảnh thơi - và chúng tôi khuyến khích họ thực sự tận dụng ngày nghỉ của mình.

Thường thì, chúng ta giả định rằng việc học chỉ diễn ra khi chúng ta nhồi nhét những ý tưởng và khái niệm mới vào n.ã.o b.ộ, trong khi thực tế là nhiều khi việc đó diễn ra trong những phút giây thư thái.

Đi ngủ - thời điểm nhận thức hoàn toàn được nghỉ ngơi là lúc mà các chuyên gia nói chúng ta dọn dẹp kiến thức của mình. Trong một nghiên cứu gần đây về những người tham gia học từ vựng ngoại ngữ, một giấc ngủ ngon giảm thời gian luyện tập đến 50%.

Mặt khác, bỏ qua giấc ngủ gây thiệt hại cho khả năng tiếp thu những thông tin mới - và điều này bao gồm những chi tiết có được trước và sau khi thiếu ngủ.

03 - GIẢNG DẠY

Như bất kỳ giáo viên nào sẽ chứng thực, cách tốt nhất để học điều gì đó là giải thích nó cho người khác. Ý tưởng này còn được gọi là Learning Pyramid, một công cụ trực quan thể hiện cách học hiệu quả nhất.

Theo như kim tự tháp, 90% mọi người giữ lại được những gì họ học được khi họ giảng lại cho ai đó hoặc áp dụng thông tin đó ngay lập tức. So sánh điều này với việc chúng ta chỉ tiếp thu được gần 10% những điều chúng ta học được nếu đơn giản chỉ có đọc.

Hành động theo kiến thức mới là một trong những cách hiệu quả nhất để tăng cường khả năng duy trì. Đó là lý do tại sao Richard Feynman nghĩ ra Kỹ thuật Feynman 4 bước, một công cụ hỗ trợ học tập phá vỡ các khái niệm thành các phiên bản dễ tiếp thu hơn.

Như Feynman từng nói: "Nếu bạn không thể giải thích một cách đơn giản, vậy thì bạn chẳng hiểu cái gì cả."

Chắt lọc một chủ đề vào các phần cơ bản của nó không chỉ giúp tăng cường sự hiểu biết, nó còn làm nổi bật các lỗ hổng kiến thức. Khi chúng ta gặp phải những lỗ hổng đó, kỹ thuật Feynman khuyên chúng ta quay trở lại tài liệu nguồn và tìm hiểu lại những gì còn thiếu sót.

04 - CHUYỂN ĐỔI

Có bao giờ bạn tự hỏi làm thế nào Elon Musk trở thành một chuyên gia đa ngành? Bên cạnh việc là một người hiếu học, việc đào tạo chéo giữa các lĩnh vực đã giúp Musk thành thạo trong từng lĩnh vực.

Musk áp dụng một kỹ thuật gọi là học chuyển: lấy những gì chúng ta học trong một bối cảnh và áp dụng nó vào một bối cảnh khác.

Ví dụ, chúng ta có thể thực hành một kỹ thuật chánh niệm hoặc một công cụ đọc hiểu. Chúng tôi cũng có thể nghiên cứu nhiều lĩnh vực và sử dụng thông tin từ một lĩnh vực để nâng cao hiểu biết của chúng tôi về lĩnh vực khác.

Để áp dụng kiến thức trong một bối cảnh mới, chúng ta phải suy nghĩ chín chắn về nó. Ví dụ, nếu tôi nắm vững các quy tắc ngữ pháp tiếng Tây Ban Nha, nó cũng sẽ giúp tôi học tiếng Pháp nhanh hơn. Và tôi sẽ tăng cường các kỹ năng ngôn ngữ Tây Ban Nha của mình trong quá trình học này.

Musk có một quá trình hai bước để học chuyển giao. Đầu tiên, ông giải mã kiến thức thành các nguyên tắc cơ bản. Sau đó, ông tái tạo nó trong một lĩnh vực mới: "Điều quan trọng là xem kiến thức như một loại cây ngữ nghĩa - đảm bảo bạn hiểu các nguyên tắc cơ bản, tức là thân cây và cành lớn, trước khi bạn đi vào lá/ chi tiết hoặc không có gì để giữ lấy."

05 - HỌC CÁCH HỌC TỐT HƠN

Không phải ngẫu nhiên những người thành công dành cả đời để học tập. Trong một thế giới chuyển động với tốc độ nhanh hơn bao giờ hết, chúng ta cần cả kỹ năng và khả năng suy nghĩ phê phán về các khái niệm mới.

Hầu hết chúng ta đều cố gắng trở nên thật giỏi trong lĩnh vực của mình - và nếu, giống như Elon Musk, chúng ta có thể thành thạo một số ngành nghề, điều đó thậm chí còn tốt hơn.

Tôi hy vọng bốn kỹ thuật này hữu ích để việc học của bạn tốt hơn và nhanh hơn.

[englishpapa]

ПРОСТЫЕ РЕКОМЕНДАЦИИ ДЛЯ ЗАПОМИНАНИЯ АНГЛИЙСКИХ СЛОВ

Если вы не обладаете фотографической памятью, вам понадобится время, чтобы запомнить новые английские слова. И даже если вы сегодня хорошо выучили их, то через месяц большая часть из них улетучится из памяти, если только вы не будете использовать их на практике ежедневно, что практически нереально. Но есть один метод, который поможет вам запомнить английские слова надолго.

Метод интервального повторения: в чем суть

Быстро и легко запоминать новую лексику английского поможет метод интервального повторения. Он основан на том, чтобы повторять информацию до того, как вы забудете ее. Этот метод включает две составляющие: повторение и интервальность. Стратегия запоминания, основанная на повторение, стара как мир: чем больше вы повторяете, тем лучше запоминаете.

А вот об интервальности стоит рассказать подробнее. Было установлено, что обучение, происходящее в результате повторения, более эффективно, когда оно разнесено во времени. Т. е. человек лучше усвоит слова, если будет повторять их, например, 10 раз каждые 10 дней, чем если попытается выучить все слова, повторив их 100 раз за один день. Происходит так благодаря особенностям работы мозга: вся лишняя информация со временем забывается. Это называется «кривая забывания».

Первым ее подробно описал немецкий психолог Герман Эббингауз. Исследуя механизмы работы нашей памяти, в частности процессы забывания, ученый выяснил, что через час после того, как вы выучили что-то, в памяти остается всего около 40% этой информации. А через неделю вы будете помнить всего 20% от выученного.

И тот же Эббингауз нашел решение, чтобы эффективнее запоминать информацию. Он обнаружил, что наилучший результат достигается, когда интервал между повторениями увеличивается с течением времени. Поэтому, когда слово новое, вам придется повторять его довольно часто, чтобы запомнить. Но чем дольше вы учите что-то, тем реже вам нужно это повторять.

Варианты интервального повторения для запоминания слов

Впервые метод интервального запоминания в обучении применили в 1930-х годах в США в качестве эксперимента. Результаты экспериментов над школьниками в Айове были положительными, но остались относительно незамеченными в научных и образовательных сообществах, и только в 60-70-х годах прошлого века Пол Пимслер подумал о применении этого метода в лингвистике. И с этого времени он начал набирать популярность.

Пимслер предложил использовать следующие интервалы:

5 секунд; 25 секунд; 2 минуты; 10 минут; 1 час; 5 часов; 1 день; 5 дней; 25 дней; 4 месяца; 1 год и 2 года.

То есть вы учите английские слова, потом повторяете их через 5 секунд, затем — через 25 секунд и так далее. И если по окончании всего цикла повторять слова раз в два года, то вы будете помнить их всегда.

Другие лингвисты предлагают и свои интервалы запоминания для этого метода. Например. Петр Возняк, который придумал первую компьютерную программу для интервальных повторений SuperMemo, предлагает упрощенную систему всего из четырех интервалов: 1 день → 7 дней → 16 дней → 35 дней.

Сам Эббингауз предложил меньшее количество интервалов: 20 минут → 8 часов → сутки.

На практике вы можете выбрать более удобный вам путь, можете комбинировать. Главное — сохранить суть: несколько повторений с увеличивающимся интервалом.

Как использовать метод интервального повторения на практике

Чтобы не забыть, что и когда вы выучили, и не забросить изучение английских слов по этому методу, используйте вспомогательные материалы.

Первый способ — карточки со словами. Подготовьте их сами или распечатайте из интернета. Это могут быть карточки по изучаемой вами теме или по теме, которая вам особенно интересна. Также приготовьте конверты или папки, на которых необходимо подписать интервал. Повторили слова через 5 часов — убрали в папку с надписью «1 день» и достали через день. Повторили через день — убрали в папку с надписью «5 дней» и достали через 5 дней. Так вы не запутаетесь, какие слова когда повторять.

Второй вариант — установить одно из приложений, специально разработанных для заучивания иностранных слов по методу интервального повторения. Например, Anki, Brainscape, Memrise. Тестируйте и выбирайте, какое вам больше нравится. Использование приложений для метода интервального запоминания слов на английском очень удобно. Вы можете учиться практически в любом месте, необязательно для этого выделять отдельное время: пока ждете транспорт, стоите в очереди к врачу или на почте, в пробке, пока ждете друзей.

Интервальное повторение — простой и одновременно высокоэффективный метод обучения английскому языку. Регулярно используя его, вы расширите словарный запас и улучшите навыки запоминания.

Запишитесь на бесплатный пробный урок по английскому!

#английский #английский язык #изучение английского #английская литература #обучение английскому #курсы #онлайн курсы #языковые курсы #курсы английского #курсы английского языка

[supplyunit11]

5 Dobrych Wiadomości Dotyczących Emerytur - Mysaver.pl

Chodzi na wczesny etap oka jest wyłącznie kosmicznym shooterem, w którym trafiają do siebie szturmowcy i rebelianci. Nowe karty praktyce będą dokładnie dodawane oraz na pewno każdy znajdzie tutaj coś dla siebie. Coś mi się wydaje, że Ojciec nie przyłożył się właśnie do szkoły Teorii Grafów i Sieci i dlatego właśnie uważa przedmiot za ‚zapychacz’. Widać zatem stanowić przedmiot równie banalnego, jak zdobycie przeciwników, tylko może obecne być ponad podjęcie trudnych moralnie decyzji. Podczas egzaminu ósmoklasisty 2020 uczeń że cierpieć ze sobą tylko akcesoria do pisania, tj. pióro lub długopis z czarnym tuszem, natomiast w sukcesie testu z matematyki również linijkę. W arkuszach egzaminacyjnych egzaminu ósmoklasisty znajdą się zarówno zadania zawarte (w których uczeń wybiera jedną odpowiedź z niewiele podanych) jak i zewnętrzne (szkoleń będzie potrzebował tenże sformułować odpowiedź). Poćwicz biegi - zarówno na czas gdy te na siła. Tam i znajdziesz wiedze na materiał zasad przetwarzania informacji i twoich uprawnień spośród obecnym związanych. Kurs multimedialny Olive Green oparty istnieje na interaktywnym filmie sensacyjnym, w jakim samodzielnie decydujesz o rozwoju akcji, i przy okazji grasz ponadto w pozostałe gry zręcznościowe i językowe. Dodaje się ilość kamerek, megapikseli, i przy tym zmniejsza wielkość ramek i robi się, że dzisiejsze innowacje szybko nie są tak przełomowe, kiedy te, które były pomieszczenie w ostatnich dziesięcioleciach.

Warto wziąć pod uwagę, że egzamin z geografii na pokładzie zwiększonym nie przylega do łatwych, dlatego by się do niego dobrze zorganizować musisz znaleźć wielką część czasu oraz zapału. Na obecnym gatunku odbywa się zresztą egzamin maturalny z języka angielskiego (poziom podstawowy). Osoby, które nie przekonywały się wcześniej języka angielskiego, mogą jednak zdecydować się na kurs języka angielskiego na etapie B1, jeśli wcześniej odbyły kursy na poziomach podstawowych. „Olive Green” jest kompleksowym kursem języka angielskiego, opartym na filmie fabularnym. Po drugie, „Olive Green” to wykorzystuje komputerowa. „Olive Green” jest filmem interaktywnym, co świadczy, że widz jest również graczem, jaki potrafi skutkować na kurs akcji filmu. „Olive Green” to ważne połączenie interaktywnego filmu, gry elektronicznej i aplikacji będącej do znajomości języka angielskiego. Niezależnie od tego, czy wybierzemy kurs, aby dokonać się do egzaminu, języka angielskiego warto rozwijać się również samodzielnie. Specjalizujemy się w jednych lekcjach pod kątem szkoły, uczelni i innej nauki aby łatwo oraz skutecznie podawać się językiem.

Specjalizujemy się w współpracy uczniom oraz kobietom które planują samodzielnie pokazać się angielskiego. Warto również przestudiować bowiem zagadnienia gramatyczne, prawidłową pisownię i zasady pisania listów oraz bycia wypowiedzi pisemnych w języku angielskim. Każdy dąży bowiem do realizacji własnych celów. Uczestniczymy w sztuk projektu szkolnego jak jeszcze oferujemy własny program. Oferujemy lekcje na jakichkolwiek etapach, konsultacji udzielają absolwenci i wykładowcy języka angielskiego i posiadacze certyfikatów językowych. Zamieszczone darmowe lekcje j. Na karcie internetowej ministerstwa zamieszczone są porady dotyczące wyboru konkretnej formy wypoczynku oraz odsyłacze do najważniejszych portali internetowych poświęconych zimowemu wypoczynkowi. sprawdzian ? Ponieważ że ludzie którzy rozpoczynają naukę na komputerze w skutku pokażą się wszystkiego zaś nie mają wyboru - najważniejsza jest umiejętność a nie powtarzanie tego co się potrafi. Projekt, prowadzony przez SuperMemo World, drinka z najbardziej utytułowanych producentów multimedialnych rozwiązań edukacyjnych, w tym kosztów online, tworzy nowy rozdział w części edutainment, czyli nurtu zakładającego naukę poprzez zabawę. Nagrana w 1971 przez Hot Butter wersja utworu „Popcorn” zatrzymuje się pierwszym singlowym hitem w relacji muzyki elektronicznej. Przejeżdżając przez województwo co chwilę mija się jakieś okropne ruiny. Poziom B1 biegłości językowej jest standaryzowany przez Europejski System Opisu Kształcenia Językowego.

Osoby, jakie nie miały wydarzenia z językiem angielskim mogą zyskać wiedze na przygotowanych kursach grupowych czy samych. Programowania najszybciej nauczymy się na określonych kursach dostosowanych do polskiej wiedzy, umiejętności także w wieku, w jakim się uważamy nie odda się jednak ukryć, że więcej osoby, które nie lubią za podobnymi rozwiązaniami nigdy nie straconej pozycji. Na polskim rynku wydawniczym pojawia się coraz więcej poradników poświęconych profesjonalnemu planowaniu również nie odda się ukryć, że nowe spośród nich są stworzone z specjalną starannością. Ćwiczenia obejmują produkt z wielu dziedzin - umiejętności czytania ze zrozumieniem, poprawnego pisania, rozpoznawania form gramatycznych, logicznego myślenia, liczenia, rozwiązywania zadań tekstowych, wiedzy przyrodniczej i dużo nowych. Osobom, jakie nie chcą inwestować kapitałów w książki jest Internet, w jakim oraz nie brak reklam na dobre nas tematy, jeżeli czyli nie brakuje nam dużej decyzji i determinacji nie musimy obawiać się o to, iż nie zdobędziemy zgody na szerokim stopniu. Wprowadzenie tego nastawienia do normalnej pracy szkolnej, jak wychodzi z doświadczeń, dodaje się nie ale do wielkiego wzrostu poziomu umiejętności językowych i nauki przedmiotowej uczniów, ale a ich wzroście poznawczego. Wspomniane umiejętności odnoszą się tak do znajomości języka angielskiego w mowie i piśmie.

#sprawdzian #kartkowka #rozprawka #wypracowanie #szkola

[mcphersonjefferson7]

Stop Squeaking! Align Yourself For Business Success!

Even for a remarkable enterprise owner like you, from a person to time, could even get discarded loose motivation in continuing the expansion of a services line. At time, hybrid cars seem to have a hard time figuring out why this once fantastic business that got you so excited every morning is a person feel like a heavy weight now. When you would like stop and think about it, what do you think your new friend's reaction is probably if this meet the very first time it's obvious you're not the person they thought they would be dating? "Oh . hi. I see that you may have been dishonest with me from the get-go here, but hey, I'm still thinking pcsoftpro available now a great shot at having an open, trusting relationship for the long-term" Obviously not. In okdo pdf tools platinum crack download , exports are "zero-rated" sales for V.S.T. purposes. supermemo crack download means that when you ship a physical product to someone outside Canada, you don't charge You have g.S.T. Yet, you get to claim (or deduct by the G.S.T. collected by you) all the "input tax credits" (G.S.T. that you paid for business purposes) to make that move. The idea, I suppose, is to encourage forwarding. Unless are generally knowledgeable on the subject, it is a good idea to select an engraver before you buy your point. The engraver can advise you prior to purchasing as from to seek for and whether they would be prepared to do the job. They may be rrn a position to refer in which a reputable dealer possible trust, or talk towards the dealer you are looking for to be sure that the resulting strategy is as anticipate it always be. If pain is a principal concern make use of a pain reducing gel or cream buy pharmacists. These solutions must be applied 30 to 60 minutes before waxing so skin color is numbed beforehand. But then what? You have to start marketing the products and getting individuals to your estore! A lot of people are switched off when they discover this is a demanding method that requires a substantial amount of hard work, time, And funds! The pain can be reduced steer clear of an antiseptic preparation before you proceed. Also, following up having a soothing lotion containing Natural aloe vera or Calamine Lotion can help to the itching and trouble. So you may have to include some investigation in what colors mean to your target promote. Colors that would get a person's eye of a youngster would probably annoy an older person and the colors that appeal to your older person wouldn't get a second look from a younger person.

#PCSOFTPRO

[womenlayer6]

Ginekologia Plastyczna. Kiedy Warto Wykonać Zabieg Miejsc Intymnych?

Ciemnobrązowi byli utrzymywani za "nieuświęconych", ponieważ taki kolor dawał się ale ze związku dwóch Ssi-ruuków o innym kolorze łusek, co uznawane było zbyt bardzo niehonorowy, plugawy akt. Ten kto jest jednak troche oczytany będzie znał np. że niemożna powiedzieć intrested to właśnie trzeba intreseted in. Czytanie prac w obcych językach jest ponad inna zaletę: uczymy się konstrukcji gramatycznych. Dla pracowników którzy rozwijają się angielskiego są przygotowane specjalne książki do czytania - ułatowione, dopasowane speciajlnie do poziomy (np. elementry- proste słownictwo, mało ciężkich zwortów i budów gramatycznych). Zapraszam do czytania książek! Wymagamy jednak w wszystkim tym pandemicznym chaosie szukać nowej normalności. Możemy te wyrobić sobie nowe, które posłużą nam znaleźć trochę spokoju, a przy okazji dadzą możliwość uzyskania aktualnej umiejętności lub umiejętności. W sztuce Richarda L. Browna zajdziemy dane na element tego, że polskie kolano powinno być rozwiązane, ponieważ gdy stopa ląduje, to kolana mają okazję ugięcia się, a stopa znajdzie się pod tułowiem. To perfekcyjne rozwiązanie zapewniające maksimum uwagi ze perspektywy lektora i możliwość konwersacji na wszelkich zajęciach.

Są ostatnie znane narzędzia, które wystarczą nam do tego, aby tworzyć bez żadnych ograniczeń. Sluchaj stacji radiowych w internecie po angielsku np BBC, ogladaj filmy na poczatek mowione po angielsku z naszymi napisami wsluchaj sie w to co mowia aktorzy i przeczytaj po polsku, nieznane slowko wylapiesz, czyli na odwrot sciagnij jakis dobry polski obraz z nadrukami anglelskimi i zwroc uwage kiedy obecne stanowi stworzone po anglielsku - ten drugi sposob jest latwiejszy, pozniej sproboj ogladac filmy anglelskie bez napisow. Kosztowało mnie mnie wtedy w przeliczeniu na nasz gorsz jakieś 300 zł, czyli 6 spotkań z native speakerem w Warszawie. 2. Być rodziną więc jak budować dobre życie znane również swoich dzieci / Dorota Terakowska, Jacek Bomba. „Pienaty” wchodzą wiedźmy. Ona śpi, rozpostarta na puchowej, estetycznej pościeli, śpi tępym, martwym snem zadowolenia, że „inny rozdział” głupiej powieści został zaczęty także z niej zostanie narysowana „23 sylwetka niemowy z ściany pleców także z kraju”, i przede wszystkim to, że „w ostatni czwartek powiedziano szczególnie dużo dobrych słów jemu, a szczególnie mnie” i otoczenie, kiedy się zdaje, zaczyna mieć wiedzę, iż owo „nie tam, w zimnym i urzędniczym Petersburgu”, którego światła może po nocach z „Pienat”, ale tylko tu, w „Pienatach”, wszystko płonie młodością, szczęściem, współpracą, kucharkami pijącymi wraz z gospodarzami herbatę z cukrem, a za to wszystko Rosja jest zobowiązana MNIE, MNIE, MNIE, która zajęłam pozycję poza wszelkimi zabobonami…

Widzę więc przede każdym po tym, że dobrze dużo wychodzę na kolokwiach. Gwarantuje że skoro ktoś przeczyta jedną książke po angielsku (około 50 stron) będzie wysoce zdziwiony tym, ile pokazałeś się słówke. Czytamy książke i obserwujemy w słowniky słówka których nierozumiemy. Tym oto sprytnym sposobem wyciągnął ze mnie numer telefonu, no bo jakoś musieliśmy się zdzwonić z racji tego, iż byliśmy w innych hotelach. Drugie wrażenie, bardzo silne mówiło tego, że jeśli pozamieniać tło kulturowe oraz religijne, to niemal identyczną powieść można by napisać o Polsce i nowoczesnej polityce. Tu w styl konfrontacyjny przedstawiono model zależności między państwem i prawem a moralnością na przykładzie Kościoła katolickiego oraz podjęto próbę wskazania korelacji ważnego dla filozofii Wschodu prawa dharmy z założeniem stanowionym. https://opisykartkowki.pl/artykul/3424/jak-napisac-zaproszenie-urodzinowe . Chciałbym przedstawić mój swój sposób. 1. sluchaj po angielsku ile sie da. 3. ucz sie slowek wg metody supermemo. Nie boli ucze sie angielskiego gdy marzy a ile chce.

6. staraj sie mowic, nawet jeden do siebie. 5. otocz sie angielskim na maxa. 18 L. Ćwierczakiewiczowa, Jak potrzebna i ważna jest umiejętność gospodarstwa dla pani, w: Kalendarz na rok 1887, dz. Koszmarny sen, w jakim nie zaliczam egzaminu, nie zdaję na inny rok albo spóźniam się na stanowiska. Stanowię w obecnej chwili na etapie upper-intermediate, a dodatkowo rok temuż byłem na poziomie pre - intermediate, do tego nieprzykładałem się specjalnie. Na pewno cierpią na puławskiej, bo do ostatniej gram, więcej w sercu również na pradze. Jak szacować się angielskiego w terminie pandemii? Absolwent przygotowany będzie do czynienia żyć w terenie diagnozy zagrożeń zdrowotnych (subiektywnych i fizycznych), projektowania działań ukierunkowanych na profilaktykę zdrowotną i eliminację zagrożeń (także zdarzeń nagłych, jak katastrofa, epidemia czy bioterroryzm) oraz analizy efektywności prowadzonych działań. Zasady podejmowania studiów I stopnia i II stopnia ustala Rada Wydziału. wypracowanie tego rzeczywiście jak koś już wcześniej wspomniał na pewno pewne jest czytanie prac i produktów po angielsku i wynotowywanie sobie najważniejszch słów i zwrotów. Jak ważna poznać Trójcę Świętą? Internetowy kurs języka angielskiego pozwala nam możliwości niedostępne teraz stacjonarnie.

Takim nowym sposobem że istnieć ustalenie domowego lub cotygodniowego rytuału nauki języka angielskiego. Z racji obecnych ograniczeń, najlepiej nauki online. Osoby dorosłe jeszcze nie mogą użyć z tradycyjnej nauki języka, choć właśnie okres spowolnienia, gdy świat tak dużo nas nie angażuje, toż najmilszy termin na powtórki językowe lub rozpoczęcie nauki od zera. W sukcesu, gdy wyróżniany fragment otwiera się wyrazem dwuliterowym, to obie litery dochodzą do inicjału. Powyższa adres to koszt który zamierza więcej 10 tys fanów na Facebooku, musi iść. Gdzie indziej robotnik budowlany podniósł ważący 1300 kg helikopter, który podzielił się i unieruchomił innego robotnika pod wodą. Na pewno podstawą przynajmniej dla mnie jest koszt który mobilizuje mnie do tego żeby faktycznie coś robić. Kurs stanowi w 100% darmowy natomiast na dodatek jest doskonale wykonany! Myślę że najskuteczniejszą strategią jest czytanie prac po angielsku. 4. pisz blog, pamietnik, cokolwiek po angielsku. Przedwczesne zakończenie ciąży liczące na wydaleniu przez organizm matki obumarłego zarodka lub płodu określane jest jako poronienie , a jego potrzebne usunięcie to aborcja .

#sprawdzian #kartkowka #rozprawka #wypracowanie #szkola

[roseproductivity]

The hobby of language learning is rife with pseudoscience. There is a tendency to ignore actual research on language acquisition and instead create idiosyncratic memorization systems. The practitioners of those systems then insist on forums and Medium articles that their particular system is the one true way to learn a language.

My friend @unrelatedwaffle takes a different approach. She did research to verify the claims of Anki and SuperMemo in order to decide which to use for her personal study. The results are quite interesting!

#language learning #anki #supermemo #studying #memorization #learning #srs #spaced repetition

[things2mustdo]

Those who plan to improve their learning skills must be alert against a volley on false claims that are ripe in books and materials devoted to accelerated learning. This short and concise list should help you avoid books or websites that do not stick to the basics of science. In addition to memory myths, you will find, at the bottom, a summary of other myths described extensively at other places of this website.

Remember to remain skeptical. Hone your skepticism and treat this list with skepticism too. Consult reputable sources.

Contents:

Memory myths

Genius and creativity myths

Sleep myths

SuperMemo myths

Language learning myths

Skepticism (links to skeptic websites)

Memory myths

Myth: It is possible to produce everlasting memories. Even reputable researchers use the term permastore (see: Prof. Harry Bahrick). It is a widely-held belief that it is possible to learn things well enough to protect them permanently from forgetting. Fact: It is possible to learn things well enough to make it nearly impossible to forget them in lifetime. Every long-term memory, depending on its strength, has an expected lifetime. When the memory strength is very high, the expected lifetime may be longer than our own lease on life. However, if we happened to get extra 200 years to live, no memory built in present life would remain safe without repetition

Myth: We never forget. Some accelerated-learning programs claim that we never forget what we learn. Knowledge simply gets "misplaced" and the key to good memory is to figure out how to dig it out. Fact: All knowledge is subject to gradual decay. Even your own name is vulnerable. It is only a matter of probability. Strong memories are very unlikely to be forgotten. The probability of forgetting one's name is like the probability of getting hit by an asteroid: possible but not considered on a daily basis

Myth: Memory is infinite. Fact: Anyone with basic computational understanding of memory knows this claim is absurd. However, this is just one of a million living claims that are incongruent with primary school level science. After all, half of Americans still believe the earth was created by God less than 10,000 years ago (apology). We cannot even hope to memorize Encyclopedia Britannica in lifetime. Memories are stored in a finite number of states of finite receptors in finite synapses in a finite volume of the human central nervous system. Even worse, storing information long-term is not easy. Most people will find it hard to go beyond 300,000 facts memorized in a lifetime. For the other extreme of this myth see: Memory overload may cause Alzheimer's

Myth: Mnemonics is a panacea to poor memory. Some memory programs focus 100% on mnemonic techniques. They claim that once you represent knowledge in an appropriate way, it can be memorized in a nearly-permanent way. Fact: Mnemonic techniques dramatically reduce the difficulty of retaining things in memory. However, they still do not produce everlasting memories. Repetition is still needed, even though it can be less frequent. If you compare your learning tools to a car, mnemonics is like a tire. You can go on without it, but it makes for a smooth ride

Myth: The more you repeat the better. Many books tell you to review your materials as often as possible (Repetitio mater studiorum est). Fact: Not only frequent repetition is a waste of your precious time, it may also prevent you from effectively forming strong memories. The fastest way to building long-lasting memories is to review your material in a precisely determined moments of time. For long memories with minimum effort use spaced repetition (see SuperMemo)

Myth: You should always use mnemonic techniques. Some enthusiasts of mnemonic techniques claim that you should use them in all situations and for all sorts of knowledge. They claim that learning without mnemonic techniques is always less effective. Fact: Mnemonic techniques also carry some costs. Sometimes it is easier to commit things to memory straight away. The pair of words teacher=instruisto in Esperanto is mnemonic on its own (assuming you know the rules of Esperanto grammar, basic roots and suffixes). Using mnemonic techniques may be an overkill in some circumstances. The rule of thumb is: evoke mnemonic techniques only when you detect a problem with remembering a given thing. For example, you will nearly always want to use a peg-system to memorize phone numbers. Best of all, mnemonic tricks should be a part of your automatically and subconsciously employed learning arsenal. You will develop it over a long run time with massive learning

Myth: We cannot improve memory by training. Infinite memory is a popular optimist's myth. A pessimist's myth is that we cannot improve our memory via training. Even William James in his genius book The Principles of Psychology (1890) wrote with certainty that memory does not change unless for the worse (e.g. as a result of disease). Fact: If considered at a very low synaptic level, memory is indeed quite resilient to improvement. Not only does it seem to change little in the course of life. It is also very similar in its action across the human population. At the very basic level, synapses of a low-IQ individual are as trainable as that of a genius. They are also not much different from those of a mollusk Aplysia or a fly Drosophila. However, there is more to memory and learning than just a single synapse. The main difference between poor students and geniuses is in their skill to represent information for learning. A genius quickly dismembers information and forms simple models that make life easy. Simple models of reality help understand it, process it and remember it. What William James failed to mention is that a week-long course in mnemonic techniques dramatically increases learning skills for many people. Their molecular or synaptic memory may not improve. What improves is their skill to handle knowledge. Consequently, they can remember more and longer. Learning is a self-accelerating and self-amplifying process. As such it often leads to miraculous results.

Myth: Encoding variability theory. Many researchers used to believe that presenting material in longer intervals is effective because of varying contexts in which the same information is presented. Fact: Methodical research indicates that the opposite is true. If you repeat your learning material in the exactly same context, your recall will be easier. Naturally, knowledge acquired in one context may be difficult to recover in another context. For this reason, your learning should focus on producing very precise memory trace that will be universally recoverable in varying contexts. For example, if you want to learn the word informavore, you should not ask How can I call John? He eats knowledge for breakfast. This definition is too context-dependent. Even if it is easy to remember, it may later appear useless. Better ask: How do I call a person who devours information?. Now, even if you always ask the same question in the same context, you are likely to correctly use the word informavore when it is needed. For more on encoding variability and spacing effect see: Spaced repetition in the practice of learning

Myth: Mind maps are always better than pictures. A picture is worth a thousand words. It is true that we remember pictures far better than words. It is true that mind maps are one of the best pictorial representations of knowledge. Some mnemonists claim that all we learn should be in the form of a picture or even a mind map. Fact: It all depends on the material we learn. One of the greatest advantages of text is its compactness and ease at which we can produce it. To memorize your grandma's birthday, you do not really need her picture. A simple verbal mnemonic will be fast to type and should suffice. In word-pair learning, 80% of your material may be textual and still be as good or even better than pictorials. If you ask about the date of the Battle of Trafalgar, you do not need a picture of Napoleon as an illustration. As long as you recall his face at the sound of his name, you have established all links needed to deduce relevant pieces of knowledge. If you add a picture of the actual battle, you will increase the quality and extent of memorized information, but you will need to invest extra minutes into finding the appropriate illustration. Sometimes a simple text formula is all you need

Myth: Review your material on the first day several times. Many authors suggest repeated drills on the day of the first contact with the new learning material. Others propose microspacing (i.e. using spaced repetition for intervals lasting minutes and hours). These are supposed to consolidate the newly learned knowledge. Fact: A single effective repetition on the first day of learning is all you need. Naturally it may happen, you cannot recall a piece of information upon a single exposure. In such cases you may need to repeat the drill. It may also happen that you cannot effectively put together related pieces of information and you need some review to build the big picture. However, in the ideal case, on the day #1 you should (1) understand and (2) execute a single successful active recall (such as answering the question "When did Pangea start breaking up?"). One exposure should then suffice to begin the process of consolidating the memory trace

Myth: Review your material next day after a good night sleep. Many authors believe that sleep consolidates memories and you need to strike iron while it is hot to ensure good recall. In other words, they suggest a good review on the next day after the first exposure. Fact: Although sleep is vital for learning and review is vital for remembering, the optimal timing of the first review is usually closer to 3-7 days. This number comes from calculations that underlie spaced repetition. If we aim to maximize the speed of learning at a steady 95% recall rate, most well-formulated knowledge for a well-trained student will call for the first review in 3-7 days. Some pieces must indeed be reviewed on the next day. Some can wait as long as a month. SuperMemo and other computer programs based on spaced repetition will optimize the length of the first interval before the first review

Myth: Learn new things before sleep. Because of the research showing the importance of sleep in learning, there is a widespread myth claiming that the best time for learning is right before sleep. This is supposed to ensure that newly learned knowledge gets quickly consolidated overnight. Fact: The opposite is true. The best time for learning in a healthy individual is early morning. Many students suffer from DSPS (see: Good sleep for good learning) and simply cannot learn in the morning. They are too drowsy. Their mind seems most clear in the quiet of the late night. They may indeed get better results by learning in the night, but they should rather try to resolve their sleep disorder (e.g. with free running sleep). Late learning may reduce memory interference, i.e. obliteration of the learned material by the new knowledge acquired during the day. However, a far more important factor is the neurohormonal state of the brain in the learning process. In a hormonal sense, the brain is best suited for learning in the morning. It shows highest alertness and the best balance between attention and creativity. The gains in knowledge structure and the speed of processing greatly outweigh all minor advantages of late-night learning

Myth: Long sleep is good for memory. Association of sleep and learning made many believe that the longer we sleep the healthier we are. In addition, long sleep improves memory consolidation. Fact: All we need for effective learning is well-structured sleep at the right time and of the optimum length. Many individuals sleep less than 5 hours and wake up refreshed. Many geniuses sleep little and practice catnaps. Long sleep may correlate with disease. This is why mortality studies show that those who sleep 7 hours live longer than 9-hour-sleepers. The best formula for good sleep: listen to your body. Go to sleep when you are sleepy and sleep as long as you need. When you catch a good rhythm without an alarm clock, your sleep may ultimately last less but produce far better results in learning. It is the natural healthy structure of sleep cycles that makes for good learning (esp. in non-declarative problem solving, creativity, procedural learning, etc.). It is not true that if your sleep is short, so is your memory

Myth: Alpha-waves are best for learning. Zillions of speed-learning programs propose learning in a "relaxed state". Consequently, gazillions of dollars are  misinvested by customers seeking instant relief to their educational pains. Fact: It is true that relaxed state is vital for learning. "Relaxed" here means stress-free, distraction-free, and fatigue-free. However, a red light should blink when you hear of fast learning through inducing alpha states. Alpha waves are better known from showing up when you are about to fall asleep. They are better correlated with lack of visual processing than with the absence of distracting stress. You do not need "alpha-wave machinery" to enter the "relaxed state". You can do far better by investing your time and money in ensuring good peaceful environment for learning, as well as in skills related to time-management, conflict-resolution, and stress-management. Neurofeedback devices may play a role in hard to crack stress cases. However, good health, peaceful environment, loving family, etc. are your simple bets for the "relaxed state"

Myth: Memory gets worse as we age. Aging universally affects all organs. 50% of 80-year-olds show symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. Hence the overwhelming belief that memory unavoidably gets rusty at an older age. Fact: It is true we lose neurons with age. It is true that the risk of Alzheimer's increases with age. However, a well-trained memory is quite resilient and shows comparatively fewer functional signs of aging than the joints, the heart, the vascular system, etc. Moreover, training increases the scope of your knowledge, and paradoxically, your mental abilities may actually increase well into a very advanced age

Myth: You can boost your learning with memory pills. Countless companies try to market various drugs and supplements with claims of improved memory. Fact: There are no memory pills out there (August 2003). Many drugs and supplements indirectly help your memory by simply making you healthier. Many substances can help the learning process itself (e.g. small doses of caffeine, sugar, etc.), but these should not be central to your concerns. It is like running a marathon. There are foods and drugs that can help you run, but if you are a lousy runner, no magic pill can make finish in less than 3 hours. Do not bank on pharmiracles. A genius memory researcher Prof. Jim Tully believes that his CREB research will ultimately lead to a memory pill. However, his memory pill is not likely to specifically affect desired memories while leaving other memories to inevitable forgetting. As such, each application of the pill will likely produce a side effect of enhanced memory traces for all things learned in the affected period. Neural network researchers know the problem as stability-vs.-plasticity dilemma. Evolution solved this problem in a way that will be hard to change. Admittedly though, combination of a short-lasting memory enhancement with a sharply-focused spaced repetition (as with SuperMemo) could indeed bring further enhancement to learning

Myth: Learning by doing is the best. Everyone must have experienced the value of learning by doing. This form of learning often leads to memories that last for years. No wonder, some educators believe that learning by doing should monopolize educational practice. Fact: Learning by doing is very effective in terms of the quality of produced memories, but it is also very expensive in expenditure of time, material, organization, etc. The experience of a dead frog's leg coming to life upon touching a wire may stay with one for life (perhaps as murderous nightmares resulting from the guilt of killing). However, a single picture or mpeg of the same experiment can be downloaded from the net in seconds and retained for life with spaced repetition at the cost of 60-100 seconds. This is incomparably cheaper than hunting for frogs in a pond. When you learn to program your VCR, you do not try all functions listed in the manual as this could take a lifetime. You skim the highlights and practice only those clicks that are useful for you. We should practise learning by doing only then when it pays. Naturally, in the area of procedural learning (e.g. swimming, touch typing, playing instruments, etc.), learning by doing is the right way to go. That comes from the definition of procedural learning

Myth: It is possible to memorize Encyclopedia Britannica. Anecdotal evidence points to historical and legendary figures able of incredible feats of memory such as learning 56 languages by the age of 17, memorizing 100,000 hadiths, showing photographic memory lasting for years, etc. No wonder that it leads to the conviction that it is possible to memorize Britannica word for word. It is supposed to only be the question of the right talent or the right technique. Fact: A healthy, intelligent and non-mutant mind shows a surprisingly constant learning rate. If Britannica is presented as a set of well-formulated questions and answers, it is easy to provide a rough estimate of the total time needed to memorize it. If there are 44 million words in Britannica, we will generate 6-15 million cloze deletions, these will require 50-300 million repetitions by the time of job's end (see spaced repetition theory), and that translates to 25-700 years of work assuming 6 hours of unflagging daily effort. All that assuming that the material is ready-to-memorize. Preparing appropriate questions and answers may take 2-5 times more than the mere memorization. If language fluency is set at 20,000 items (this is what you need to pass TOEFL in flying colors or comfortably read Shakespeare), the lifetime limit on learning languages around 50 might not be impossible (assuming total dawn-to-dusk dedication to the learning task). Naturally, those who claim fluency in 50 languages, are more likely to show an arsenal of closer to 2000 words per language and still impress many

Myth: Hypertext can substitute for memory. An amazingly large proportion of the population holds memorization in contempt. Terms "rote memorization", "recitatory rehearsal", "mindless repetition" are used to label any form of memorization or repetition as unintelligent. Seeing the "big picture", "reasoning" and leaving the job of remembering to external hypertext sources are supposed to be viable substitutes. Fact: Associative memory underlies the power of the human mind. Hypertext references are a poor substitute for associative memory. Two facts stored in human memory can instantly be put together and bring a new idea to life. The same facts stored on the Internet will remain useless until they are pieces together inside a creative mind. A mind rich in knowledge, can produce rich associations upon encountering new information. An empty mind is as useful as a toddler given the power of the Internet in search of a solution. Biological neural networks work in such a way, that knowledge is retained in memory only if it is refreshed/reviewed. Learning and repetition are therefore still vital for the progress of mankind.

Myth: People differ in the speed of learning, but they all forget at the same speed. Fact: Although there are mutations that might affect the forgetting rate, at the very lowest biological level, i.e. the synaptic level, the rate of forgetting is indeed basically the same; independent of how smart you are. However, the same thing that makes people learn faster, helps them forget slower. The key to learning and slow forgetting is representation (i.e. the way knowledge is formulated). If you learn with SuperMemo, you will know that items can range from being very difficult to being very easy. The difficult ones are forgotten much faster and require shorter intervals between repetitions. The key to making items easy, is to formulate them well. Moreover, good students will show better performance on the exactly same material. This is because the ultimate test on the formulation of knowledge is not in how it is structured in your learning material, but in the way it is stored in your mind. With massive learning effort, you will gradually improve the way you absorb and represent knowledge in your mind. The fastest student is the one who can instinctively visualize and store knowledge in his mind using minimum-information maximum-connectivity imagery

Myth: Learning while sleeping. An untold number of learning programs promises you to save years of life by learning during sleep. Fact: It is possible to store selected memories generated during sleep by: external stimuli, dreams, hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations (i.e. hallucinations experienced while falling asleep and while waking up). However, it is nearly impossible to harness this process into productive learning. The volume of knowledge that can be gained during sleep is negligible. Learning in sleep may be disruptive to sleep itself. Learning while sleeping should not be confused with the natural process of memory consolidation and optimization that occurs during sleep. This process occurs during a complete sensory cut-off, i.e. there are no known methods of influencing its course to the benefit of learning. Learning while sleeping is not only a complete waste of time. It may simply be unhealthy

Myth: High fluency reflects high memory strength. Our daily observations seem to indicate that if we recall things easily,  if we show high fluency, we are likely to remember things for long. Fact: Fluency is not related to memory strength! The two-component model of long-term memory shows that fluency is related to the memory variable called retrievability, while the length of the period in which we can retain memories is related to another variable called stability. These two variables are independent. This means that we cannot derive memory stability from the current fluency (retrievability). The misconception comes from the fact that in traditional learning, i.e. learning that is not based on spaced repetition, we tend to remember only memories that are relatively easy to remember. Those memories will usually show high fluency (retrievability). They will also last for long for reasons of importance, repetition, emotional attachment, etc. No wonder that we tend to believe that high fluency is correlated with memory strength. Users of SuperMemo can testify that despite excellent fluency that follows a repetition, the actual length of the interval in which we recall an item will rather depend on the history of previous repetitions, i.e. we remember better those items that have been repeated many times. See also: automaticity vs. probability of forgetting

The list of myths is by no means complete. I included only the most damaging distortions of the truth, i.e. the ones that can affect even a well-informed person. I did not include myths that are an offence to our intelligence. I did not ponder over repressed memories, subliminal learning, psychic learning, or remote viewing (unlike CIA). The list is simply too long.

See also: Memory FAQ

Sleep myths (see: Good sleep for good learning for a more comprehensive list)

Myth: Since we feel rested after sleep, sleep must be for resting. Ask anyone, even a student of medicine: What is the role of sleep? Nearly everyone will tell you: Sleep is for rest. Fact: Sleep is for optimizing the structure of memories. If it was for rest or energy saving, we would cover the saving by consuming just one apple per night. To effectively encode memories, mammals, birds and even reptiles need to turn off the thinking and do some housekeeping in their brains. This is vital for survival. This is why the evolution produced a defense mechanism against skipping sleep. If we do not get sleep, we feel miserable. We are not actually as wasted as we feel, the damage can be quickly repaired by getting a good night sleep. Our health may not suffer as much as our learning and intelligence. Feeling wasted in sleep deprivation is the result of our brain dishing punishment for not sticking to the rules of an intelligent form of life. Let the memory do restructuring in its programmed time

Myth: Sleeping little makes you more competitive. Many people are so busy with their lives that they sleep only 3-4 hours per night. Moreover, they believe that sleeping little makes them more competitive. Many try to train themselves for minimum sleep. Donald Trump, in his newest book, tells you: "If you want to be a billionaire, sleep as little as possible". Fact: It is true that many geniuses slept little. Many business sharks slept even less. However, the only good formula for maximum long-term competitiveness is via maximum health and maximum creativity. If Trump sleeps 3 hours per night and enjoys his work, he is likely to run it on alertness hormones (ACTH, cortisol, adrenaline, etc.). His sleep is probably structured very well and he may extract more neural benefit per hour of sleep than an average 8-hours-per-night sleeper. Yet that should not make you try to beat yourself to action with an alarm clock. You will get shortest and maximum quality sleep only then when you perfectly hit your circadian low-time, i.e. when your body tells you "now it is time to sleep". Sleep in wrong hours, or sleep interrupted with an alarm clock is bound to undermine your intellectual performance and creativity. Occasionally, you may think that a loss on intellectual side will be counterbalanced with the gain on the action side (e.g. clinching this vital deal). Remember though, that you also need to factor in the long-term health consequences. Unless, of course, you think a heart attack at 45 is a good price to pay for becoming a billionaire  

Myth: Sleeping pills will help you sleep better. Fact: Benzodiazepines can help you sleep, but this sleep is of far less quality than naturally induced sleep (the term "sleeping pill" here does not apply to sleep-inducing supplements such as melatonin, minerals, or herbal preparations). Not only are benzodiazepines disruptive to the natural sleep stage sequence. They are also addictive and subject to tachyphylaxis (the more you take the more you need to take). Sleeping pills can be useful in circumstances where sleep is medically vital, and cannot be achieved by other means. Otherwise, avoid sleeping pills whenever possible

Myth: Silence and darkness are vital for sleep. This may be the number one advice for insomniacs: use your sleeping room for sleep only, keep it dark and quiet. Fact: Silence and darkness indeed make it easier to fall asleep. They may also help maintain sleep when it is superficial. However, they are not vital. Moreover, for millions of insomniacs, focusing on peaceful sleeping place obscures the big picture: the most important factor that makes us sleep well, assuming good health, is the adherence to one's natural circadian rhythm! People who go to sleep along their natural rhythm can often sleep well in bright sunshine. They can also show remarkable tolerance to a variety of noises (e.g. loud TV, family chatter, the outside window noise, etc.). This is all possible thanks to the sensory gating that occurs during sleep executed "in phase". Absence of sensory gating in "wrong phase" sleep can easily be demonstrated by lesser changes to AEPs (auditory evoked potentials) registered at various parts of the auditory pathway in the brain. Noises will wake you up if you fail to enter deeper stages of sleep, and this failure nearly always comes from sleeping at the wrong circadian phase (e.g. going to sleep too early). If you suffer from insomnia, focus on understanding your natural sleep rhythm. Peaceful sleeping place is secondary (except in cases of impaired sensory gating as in some elderly). Insomniacs running their daily ritual of perfect darkness, quiet,  stresslessness and sheep-counting are like a stranded driver hoping for fair winds instead of looking for the nearest gas station. Even worse, if you keep your place peaceful, you run the risk of falling asleep early enough to be reawakened by the quick elimination of the homeostatic component of sleep. Learn the principles of healthy sleep that will make you sleep in all conditions. Only then focus on making your sleeping place as peaceful as possible. For more see: Good sleep, good learning

Myth: People are of morning or evening type. Fact: This is more of a misnomer than a myth. Evening type people, with chronotherapy, can easily be made to wake up with the sun. What people really differ in is the period of their body clock, as well as the sensitivity to and availability of stimuli that reset that rhythm (e.g. light, activity, stress, etc.). People with an unusually long natural day and low sensitivity to resetting stimuli will tend to work late and wake up late. Hence the tendency to call them "evening type". Those people do not actually prefer evenings, they simply prefer longer working days. The lifestyle affects the body clock as well. A transition from a farmer's lifestyle to a student's lifestyle will result in a slight change to the sleeping rhythm. This is why so many students feel as if they were of the evening type

Myth: Avoid naps. Fact: Naps may indeed worsen insomnia in people suffering from DSPS, esp. if taken too late in the day. Otherwise, naps are highly beneficial to intellectual performance. It is possible to take naps early in the day without affecting one's sleeping rhythm. Those naps must fall before or inside the so-called dead zone where a nap does not produce a phase response (i.e. shift in the circadian rhythm)

Myth: Night shifts are unhealthy. Fact: People working in night shifts are often forced out of work by various ailments such as a heart condition. However, it is not night shifts that are harmful. It is the constant switching of the sleep rhythm from day to night and vice versa. It would be far healthier to let night shift people develop their own regular rhythm in which they would stay awake throughout the night. It is not night wakefulness that is harmful. It is the way we force our body do things it does not want to do

Myth: Going to bed at the same time is good for you. Fact: Many sleep experts recommend going to sleep at the same time every day. Regular rhythm is indeed a form of chronotherapy recommended in many circadian rhythm problems. However, people with severe DSPS may simply find it impossible to go to sleep at the same time everyday. Such forced attempts will only result in a self-feeding cycle of stress and insomnia. In such cases, the struggle with one's own rhythm is simply unhealthy. Unfortunately, people suffering from DSPS are often forced into a "natural" rhythm by their professional and family obligations

Myth: People who sleep less live longer. In 2002, Dr Kripke compared the length of sleep with longevity (1982 data from a cancer risk survey). He figured out that those who sleep 6-7 hours live longer than those who sleep 8 hours and more. No wonder that a message started spreading that those who sleep less live longer. Fact: The best longevity prognosis is ensured by sleeping in compliance with one's natural body rhythm. Those who stick to their own good rhythm often sleep less because their sleep is better structured (and thus more refreshing). "Naturally sleeping" people live longer. Those who sleep against their body call, often need to clock more hours and still do not feel refreshed. Moreover, disease is often correlated with increased demand for sleep. Infectious diseases are renowned for a dramatic change in sleep patterns. When in coma, you are not likely to be adding years to your life. Correlation is not causation

Myth: A nap is a sign of weakness. Fact: A nap is not a sign of weakness, ill-health, laziness or lack of vigor. It is a philogenetic remnant of a biphasic sleeping rhythm. Not all people experience a significant mid-day slump in mental performance. It may be well masked by activity, stress, contact with people, sport, etc. However, if you experience a slump around the 6th to 8th hour of your day, taking a nap can dramatically boost your performance in the second half of the day

Myth: Alarm clock can help you regulate the sleep rhythm. Fact: An alarm clock can help you push your sleep rhythm into the desired framework, but it will rarely help you accomplish a healthy sleep rhythm. The only tried-and-true way to accomplish a healthy sleep and a healthy sleep rhythm is to go to sleep only when you are truly sleepy, and to wake up naturally without external intervention

Myth: Being late for school is bad. Fact: Kids who persistently cannot wake up for school should be left alone. Their fresh mind and health are far more important. 60% of kids under 18 complain of daytime tiredness and 15% fall asleep at school (US, 1998). Parents who regularly punish their kids for being late for school should immediately consult a sleep expert as well as seek help in attenuating the psychological effects of the trauma resulting from the never ending cycle of stress, sleepiness and punishment

Myth: Being late for school is a sign of laziness. Fact: If a young person suffers from DSPS, it may have perpetual problems with getting up for school in time. Those kids are often actually brighter than average and are by no means lazy. However, their optimum circadian time for intellectual work comes after the school or even late into the evening. At school they are drowsy and slow and simply waste their time. If chronotherapy does not help, parents should consider later school hours or even home-schooling

Myth: We can sleep 3 hours per day. Many people enviously read about Tesla's or Edison's sleeping habits and hope they could train themselves to sleep only 3 hours per day having far more time for other activities. Fact: This might work if you plan to party all the time. And if your health is not a consideration. And if your intellectual capacity is not at stake. You can sleep 3 hours and survive. However, if your aspirations go beyond that, you should rather sleep exactly as much as your body wants. That is an intelligent man's optimum. With your improved health and intellectual performance, your lifetime gains will be immense

Myth: We can adapt to polyphasic sleep. Looking at the life of lone sailors, many people believe they can adopt polyphasic sleep and save many hours per day. In polyphasic sleep, you take only 4-5 short naps during the day totaling less than 4 hours. There are many "systems" differing in the arrangement of naps. There are also many young people ready to suffer the pains to see it work. Although a vast majority will drop out, a small circle of the most stubborn ones will survive a few months and will perpetuate the myth with a detriment to public health. Fact: We are basically biphasic and all attempts to change the inbuilt rhythm will result in loss of health, time, and mental capacity. Polyphasic sleep has not been designed for maximum alertness (let alone maximum creativity). It has been designed for maximum alertness in conditions of sleep deprivation (as in solo yachting). A simple rule is: when sleepy, go to sleep; while asleep, continue uninterrupted. See: The myth of polyphasic sleep

Myth: Sleep before midnight is more valuable. Fact: Sleep is most valuable if it comes at the time planned by your own body clock mechanism. If you are not sleepy before midnight, forcing yourself can actually ruin your night if you wake up early

Myth: The body will always crave excess sleep as it craves excess food. Some people draw a parallel between our tendency to overeat with sleep. They believe that if we let the body dictate the amount of sleep, it will always ask for more than needed. As a result, they prefer to cut sleep short with an alarm clock to "optimize" the amount of sleep they get. Fact: Unlike storage of fat, there seems to be little evolutionary benefit to extra sleep. Probably, our typical 6-8 hour sleep is just enough to do all "neural housekeeping". People with sleep deficit may indeed tend to sleep obscenely long. However, once they catch up and get into the rhythm, the length of their sleep is actually likely to decrease!

Myth: Magnesium, folates, and other supplements can help you sleep better. Fact: Nutrients needed for good health are also good for sleep. However, supplementation is not likely to play a significant role in resolving your sleep problems. Vitamins may help if you are in deficit, but a vast majority of sleep disorders in society come from the lack of respect or understanding of the circadian rhythm. Only wisely administered melatonin is known to have a beneficial effect on the advancement of sleep phase. If you are having problems with sleep, read Good sleep for good life. As for supplements, stick to a standard healthy diet. That should suffice

Myth: It is best to wake up with the sun. Fact: You should wake up at the time when your body decides it got enough of sleep. If this happens to be midday, a curtain over the window will prevent you from being woken up by the sun. At the same time sun may help you reset your body clock and help you wake up earlier. People who wake up naturally with the sun are indeed among the healthiest creatures on the planet. However, if you do not wake up naturally before 4 am, trying to do so with the help of an alarm clock will only add misery to your life

Myth: You cannot change the inherent period length of your body clock. Fact: With various chronotherapeutic tricks it is possible to change the period of the clock slightly. It can be reset or advanced harmlessly by means of melatonin, bright light, exercise, meal timing, etc. It can also be reset in a less healthy way: with an alarm clock. However, significant lifestyle changes may be needed to resolve severe cases of DSPS or ASPS. The therapy may be stressful, and the slightest deviation from the therapeutic regimen may result in the relapse to an undesirable rhythm. Those who employ free-running sleep may take the easiest way out of the period length problem: stick to the period that is the natural outcome of your current lifestyle

See also:

Sleep FAQ

Creativity myths (see: Genius and Creativity for a more comprehensive list)

Myth: You must be born with a creative mind! Fact: Some kids indeed show an incredible curiosity and rage to master. However, there are many techniques that can help you multiply your creativity. Creativity is trainable. See Genius and Creativity for some hints

Myth: If you miss childhood, your genius is lost! Fact: Human brain is plastic by definition. In many fields of learning, childhood neglect makes later progress harder; however, training can always produce miracles. Childhood is very important for growth, but if you lost it, you can still catch up in many areas with intense training

Myth: Do not memorize! Fact: This fallacy comes from the fact that many sources fail to delineate the full spectrum of knowledge applicability from dry useless facts to highly abstract reasoning rules. Understanding, thinking, problem solving, creativity, etc. are all based on knowledge. This rule should rather be formulated as: Knowledge selection is critical for success in learning. The correct and non pejorative definition of the word memorize is to: "commit knowledge to memory". Along this definition, you can say: Do memorize! Just make a smart selection of things to learn. See: Smart and dumb learning for a discussion and examples

Myth: Proliferation of geniuses is a threat to humanity. Fact: Most of the good things that surround us are a product of nature, love, or human genius. It is true that the output of genius minds is often used for evil purposes; however, halting genius would be equivalent to halting or reversing the global progress

Myth: If you do something stupid, so are you! Fact: Human brain is an imperfectly programmed machine. It never stops learning and verifying its errors. Its knowledge base is painfully limited. The same brain may be able to disentangle the complexities of the string theory and then slip on simple sums. Notes left by Newton, Leibnitz or Babbage show that they erred on their way to great discovery or meandered in an entirely wrong direction. We measure genius by its top accomplishments, not by the lack of failures

Myth: Geniuses do not forget things! Fact: Genius brains are made of the same substance as average ones. Consequently, their memories are subject to the exactly same laws of forgetting. All knowledge in the human brain declines along a negatively exponential curve. Forgetting is as massive in a genius mind as it is in any other. The best tools against forgetting are (1) good knowledge representation (e.g. mnemonic techniques) and (2) review (based on active recall and spaced repetition). Geniuses may hold an advantage by developing powerful representation skills that make learning much easier. They often develop those skills early and without a conscious effort. However, the science of mnemonics is well developed and you can see a dramatic difference in your knowledge representation skills after a week-long course

Myth: Geniuses sleep little! Fact: When looking at Edison, Tesla, or Churchill it is easy to believe that cutting down on sleep does not seem to pose a problem in creative achievement. Those who try to work creatively in conditions of sleep deprivation will quickly discover though that fresh mind is by far more important than those 2-3 hours one can save by sleeping less. A less visible side effect of sleep deprivation is the effect on memory consolidation and creativity in the long term. Lack of sleep hampers remembering. It also prevents creative associations built during sleep. It is not true that geniuses sleep less. Einstein would work best if he got a solid nine hours of sleep

Myth: Early to ripe, early to rot! Fact: Terman Study contradicts this claim. A majority of precocious kids go on to do great things in life

Myth: You need a degree! Fact: Edison got only 3 months of formal schooling. Lincoln spent less than a year at school. Benjamin Franklin's formal education ended when he was 10. Graham Bell was mostly family trained and self-taught. Steve Wozniak, Steve Jobs, Dean Kamen, and Bill Gates were all college drop-outs. Isaac Newton found school boring and was considered by many a mediocre student. However, there is one thing they all had in common: they loved books and could spend whole days reading and studying

Myth: Genius can be evil! Fact: Evil, by definition, is foolish. One can show genius skills in a narrow field and still be an evil person, but an evil human being does not deserve a title of a genius. True wisdom can reach far beyond a narrow field of specialization. It will inevitably encompass the matters of ethics. This is why all true geniuses are deeply concerned with the future of humanity. See: Goodness of knowledge

Myth: Be unique! This boosts creativity! Fact: The relationship between uniqueness and creativity is reverse. It is true that many creative people are unique or strange in behavior. This comes from their creative way of looking at things and unwillingness to stick to those forms of tradition that defy reason. By no means an effort towards uniqueness will boost creativity. It is true that Einstein smoked a pipe, but it does not mean that you will be more of a genius if you take on smoking a pipe

Myth: TV makes you stupid! Fact: TV or radio can be harmful if you are unable to control what you watch or listen, or if you are unable to optimize the proportion of your time spent on broadcasts. Otherwise, TV is still hard to match in its ability to present to you a pre-selected and emphatically graphic video material for the purposes of education or getting informed. Video education based on the material from reputable channels may be the most efficient form of tutor-less education. Swap MTV for Discovery, and make a good selection. Although you cannot employ incremental video watching yet (cf. incremental reading), a dose of daily DVDR viewing will help you stay up to date with the news and brush up your general education

Myth: Curiosity killed the cat! Fact: As long as you stay within the boundaries of politeness, live by a better proverb: Curiosity is your pass to the kingdom of knowledge

Myth: We use only 0.1% of our brain power. Some reputable researchers derived the 0.1% figure from a simple calculation involving the number of neurons and the numbers of synapses residing in the human brain. The resulting figure seemed to imply an astounding computational capacity. Fact: The brain is energetically a very expensive organ. Only major improvements in human diet in the course of human evolution made it possible to provide for a substantial gain in the brain mass. If the 0.1% or even the 10% claim was to be true, the unused portions of the brain would quickly fall prey to natural selection resulting in energy-saving shrinkage of the brain. A living brain even prunes those circuits that are of little use and sprouts new connections there where they are needed. Portions of brain are programmed to execute highly specialized functions, other portions can easily be used to store vast expanses of declarative knowledge. The process of forgetting has been fine tuned to maximize the use of the existing storage in the reproductive lifetime. Nevertheless, it is not likely we ever run out of memory space when using the trick of spaced repetition to maximize the inflow of new information to memory

Myth: Gifted kids become genius adults. Fact: It is the personality and the training that determine the final outcome. Most of gifted kids are lucky to do well; however, giftedness should not be taken for granted

Myth: Mozart effect. Listening to Mozart increases intelligence. Fact: Mozart was one of the greatest musical geniuses in history. His music might be used in musicality training and produce far better neural effects than, say, today's pop music. However, Mozart's impact on neural growth cannot be verifiably judged better than that of solving cross-word puzzles, singing, playing soccer or learning chemistry. To a philistine, Mozart may do as much good as a recitation of Goethe's poems to a baboon. Neither is listening to Mozart superior to listening to your favorite pieces of music for the sake of boosting "happy brain messengers". Mozart has been cannibalized by the accelerated learning industry as a simple way towards a quick buck. Few gimmicks are as simple as packaging a Mozart CD with a label "Learn 10 times faster". Mozart Effect powerfully illustrates the myth-making power of money. This power has also spawned other cheap "learning solutions" such as learning while sleeping, learning while relaxing, or memory-boosting supplements. Regrettably, even highly respected and reputable websites, journals or TV program fall prey to these catchy memes. Your vigilance needs to triple in these areas

See also: Genius and creativity FAQ

SuperMemo myths

Ever since it was conceived, SuperMemo had to struggle with myths slowing down its popularization. Preventing the reappearance of myths appears to be a never-ending battle. The knowledge about SuperMemo has grown to a substantial volume. Not all users can afford reading dozens of articles. Many are prone to arrive to the same wrong conclusions independently of others. Some of these myths are rooted in general myths of memory (as above). Others seem to spring from the common sense thinking about learning. Here are some most damaging myths related to spaced repetition and SuperMemo:

Myth: SuperMemo can only be used for learning languages. SuperMemo gained most popularity by its effectiveness in learning vocabulary of foreign languages. Hence the myth that SuperMemo is a program for learning languages. A related myth is that it is a program that can only be used for cramming facts, while it cannot effectively be used for complex sciences, rules, modeling, problem solving, creativity, etc. Fact: SuperMemo can be used in any form of declarative learning (i.e. learning of things you can find in textbooks as opposed to learning to ride a bike, etc.). Word-pair learning appears to be the simplest application, while learning complex facts and rules of science may require far more skills in formulating the learning material. This is why many users are indeed unsuccessful when trying to learn, for example, astronomy. If you read 20 rules of formulating knowledge you will realize the number of snags that have to be overcome. Those snags contribute to Myth #1 on the limited applicability of SuperMemo

Myth: SuperMemo is a great tool for cramming. Many first-time users hear it by word of mouth that SuperMemo is a great tool for cramming. They are ready to buy the program only for the purpose of an exam coming in a week. Fact: SuperMemo is nearly useless for cramming knowledge that is supposed to last less than a week. For fast cramming to an exam, use traditional review, recall, repeat approach known to crammers for ages. The power of SuperMemo increases in proportion to the expected lifetime of knowledge in your memory. SuperMemo is useful if you need to remember things for a year (e.g. legal code). It is more useful if you learn for a decade (e.g. a programming language). But it is unsurpassed in gathering lifetime knowledge (e.g. anatomy, geography, history, etc.)

Myth: SuperMemo is hard to use. Several thousand FAQs and the 5 MB help file make many think SuperMemo is complex. It may appear like a program dedicated to heavyweight professionals. This makes it seem like a program of little use to mere mortals. Fact: It is true that some users start from the "wrong end" or wrong pre-conceived assumptions. They may indeed get lost or frustrated. However, a well-tested and certified fact is that SuperMemo can be used effectively after a 3 minute introduction! A great part of its power (perhaps a half) can be harnessed by learning just two operations: Add new (adding new questions and answers) and Learn (making repetitions). Naturally, things get gradually more complex when you start adding multimedia, foreign language support, templates, categories, etc. At the other end, incremental reading, a powerful reading and learning technique, may require months of training before bringing quality results. You can easily start using SuperMemo today, and gradually build skills needed to expand its power

Myth: SuperMemo is useless. Some people truly believe that the natural mechanisms of building long-term memories are superior to spaced repetition. Fact: Our brain prefers "easy" over "important". We excel at remembering celebrity trivia. We are dismal at recalling mathematical formulas learned in high school. In addition, those who deny the value of spaced repetition usually fail to appreciate the value of associative memory, or fail to delineate the distinction between cramming facts and learning universal inference rules. There are many traps of ignorance that prevent people from ever trying SuperMemo. See: SuperMemo is Useless and No force in the world can convince me to SuperMemo

Myth: As you add more material to SuperMemo, your repetition loads mount beyond being manageable. No item added to SuperMemo is considered "memorized for good". For that reasons, all items are subject to review sooner or later. This makes many believe that there is an inevitable increase in the cost of repetitions. Fact: It is true that a large number of outstanding repetitions is the primary excuse for SuperMemo drop-outs. However, computer simulations as well as real-life measurements show that, with the constant daily learning time, the acquisition of new knowledge does not visibly slow down in time (except the very first couple of months). In other words, from a long-term perspective, the acquisition of new knowledge is nearly linear. Older items are repeated less and less quickly leaving room for new material. The exponential nature of this "fading" explains why we can continue with a heavy inflow of new material for decades

Myth: SuperMemo repetitions take too much time. Many users struggle with an increasing load of repetitions and may conclude that the effort is not worth the outcome. Fact: Just 3 well-selected items memorized per day may produce a better effect than a hundred crammed facts. This means that even a minute per day will make a world of difference, as long as you pay attention to what you learn. Not all knowledge is worth the effort of 99% retention. High retention should be reserved only for mission-critical facts and rules. Last but not least: knowledge formulating skills may cut the learning time in beginners by more than 90%

Myth: SuperMemo is expensive. At prices approaching $40 for the newest Windows version, SuperMemo may seem too expensive for users in poorer countries of Africa, Asia or even Eastern Europe. Fact: Older versions of SuperMemo for DOS and Windows are free. Its on-line version is still free. Even the newest version of SuperMemo is available free for contributors to SuperMemo Library

Myth: SuperMemo requires a computer. Fact: See: paper and pencil SuperMemo

Myth: We do not need SuperMemo, all we need is to build an index to knowledge sources. With multiple on-line sources of knowledge, some people are tempted to believe that memorizing things is no longer needed. All we supposedly need to learn is how to access and use these external sources of knowledge. Fact: Knowledge stored in human memory is associative in nature. In other words, we are able to suddenly combine two known ideas to produce a new quality: an invention. We cannot (yet) effectively associate ideas that live on the Internet or in an encyclopedia. All creative geniuses need knowledge to form new concepts. The extent of this knowledge will vary, but the creative output does depend on the volume of knowledge, its associative nature, and its abstractness (i.e. its relevance in building models). Lastly, even "index to knowledge" is subject to forgetting and needs to be maintained via repetition or review. See: SuperMemo is Useless

Myth: Many people are successful without using SuperMemo, hence its importance is secondary. Fact: Neither Darwin nor Newton had access to computers, yet computer illiteracy may make today's scientist entirely impotent. Similarly, with a growing importance of knowledge, neglecting the competitive advantage of a wider and stable knowledge will increasingly limit your chances of successful career in science, engineering, medicine, politics, etc. You can live without SuperMemo, but it can definitely raise your learning to a new level

Myth: Natural mechanism of selecting important memories is good enough. We do not need a crutch. The evolution produced an effective forgetting mechanism that frees our memory from space-consuming and perhaps irrelevant garbage. This mechanism proved efficient enough to build the amazing human civilization. Consequently, many believe that there cannot be much room for improvement. Fact: The forgetting mechanism was built in abstraction from our wishes and decisions. It only spares memories that are used frequently enough. Now though, we are smart enough to decide on our own which knowledge is vital and which is not. A single peek into a dictionary may often take more time than the lifetime cost of refreshing the same word in SuperMemo. And that is the least spectacular example. Human history is rich in monumental errors coming from ignorance. NASA's confusion of imperial and metric units cost a lost Mars probe. Confusion of comma with a dot in Fortran, cost a Venus probe. Errors in English communication caused many aerial and maritime catastrophes. A piece of knowledge in surgeon's mind may be worth the life of his patient. Forgetting is too precarious to leave mission-critical knowledge in its hands. SuperMemo puts you in command

Myth: Developing photographic memory is a better investment. Fact: A great deal of claims related to photographic memory are vastly exaggerated or plain false. Mnemonic tools are vital for efficient learning, but they are no substitute to SuperMemo. They are complementary. Techniques such as Photoreading use the same catchy photo-scanner concept. Unlike SuperMemo, they are easy to publicize and comprehend. However, SuperMemo's superiority in the arsenal of a student's tools is easily demonstrable with plain facts of science, as well as in the practice of learning. For more see: articles at supermemo.com

Myth: Memorizing multiplication table only deprives one of computing skills. Like kids using calculators, those who memorize the multiplication table with SuperMemo are supposed to be less numerate (i.e. less fluent in their calculation skills). Fact: Memorizing the basic 9x9 multiplication table is the cornerstone of all calculation on paper and in mind. Memorizing the 20x20 multiplication table is also a good way of training basic multiplication skills. It is hardly possible to actually memorize the 20x20 table. Intuitively, most students do it the right way by using the combination of their familiar 9x9 table and their adding skills. For example, 14*16 is remembered as 10*14+6*14=140+6*10+6*4=140+60+24=224. This means that the student uses (1) a simple decomposition, (2) zero-shifting rule, (3) the 9x9 table once (to figure out that 4*6=24) and then (4) addition (to add the resulting three numbers). In contrast to the myth, all students who learned the 20x20 multiplication table report a dramatic increase in their multiplication skills. Alas, there is relatively very little carry over to division skills. These require additional learning material and slightly more complex skills (see: Division Table)

Myth: SuperMemo is so simple that it is not needed (PalmGear user's comment). Fact: Simplicity of an idea usually enhances its usefulness. The underlying idea of SuperMemo (increasing intervals) is indeed very simple. However, doing all computations by hand makes little sense, and not employing spaced repetition is bound to negatively affect learning. Consequently, SuperMemo is necessary for knowledge where retention levels are to reach above 80%. Otherwise, any disorganized system of repetitions becomes very wasteful. Ironically, many users of SuperMemo for Windows complain that the program is too complex (see Myth: SuperMemo is Hard)

Myth: The main learning bottleneck is short-term memory, hence SuperMemo is not needed. Some educators live by the wrong conviction that it is the short-term memory that is the bottleneck of learning. This comes from common daily observations of devastating leak in sensory memory. We retain only a fraction of what we perceive. Fact: The opposite is true. Short-term memory is indeed very leaky. However, we can retain in short-term memory far more than we can retain over the long term. The myth is partly derived from the conviction that long-term memory is virtually limitless. The error comes from noticing the huge long-term storage, while neglecting the difficulty with which we retain knowledge in that storage. An advanced student will quickly learn all mnemonic tricks necessary to retain far more in his or her short-term memory than (s)he is able to convert into a lasting knowledge

Myth: Drilling fluency is more important that drilling for retention. Some students and educators believe that they need to train for quick retrieval which often determines the performance (e.g. as in IQ tests). They believe that clocking the repetition improves the retention. Fact: The myth originates from the research by B.F. Skinner's student Ogden Lindsley in the 1960s, which shows how fluency training can demonstrably enhance learning (e.g. in classroom conditions). Lindsley's fluency research does not translate directly to spaced repetition methodology though due to the problem of spacing effect (see also: Memory myth: Fluency reflects memory strength). The procedure that may enhance recall after a single session is not necessarily optimum for repeated active recall in spaced repetition. A clocked drill is more likely to evoke the spacing effect as retrieval difficulty enhances memory consolidation. Consequently, a timed drill will actually increase the frequency of repetitions and overall repetition workload per item. In SuperMemo terms, the effect is similar to an attempt to reduce the forgetting index below 3%. Assuming maximum attention, slow considerate repetition is likely to leave more durable memory traces than a clocked fluency drill. Fluency training makes sense for knowledge whose retrieval is time-critical. This may refer to procedural learning, training before tests based on fluency, foreign language training, reading fluency, etc. However, for fields where creativity is more important than speed, or where solving the problem is more important than solving it fast, "slow" (i.e. meticulous and considerate) learning is recommended. Independently, in SuperMemo, it is the user who determines the grading criteria in learning. Fluency may, but does not have to be included in self-assessment. In other words, although speedy drills are not recommended, SuperMemo does not prevent the user from employing them

See also: SuperMemo FAQ

Language learning myths

Antimoon has compiled another myth list related to language learning: Language learning: Myths and facts.

I personally disagree with classifying the tolerance for language errors as a strategic mistake (myth: "It's OK to make mistakes"). Antimoon's approach assumes that the student's goals is to reach a perfect command of the language, while most students are rather interested in maximum communication fluency in minimum time. When learning English myself, I was primarily interested in communication while accepting a large margin of tolerance for non-semantic errors. This left me with a legacy of wrong habits that are hard to root out. Yet my communication goals have been accomplished on target. Given a choice, I would chose the same strategy again. This is why I would cut Antimoon's myth list by one position

Skepticism

Remain skeptical. Read more about the myths listed above. Drop me an e-mail if you disagree. Or if you believe I missed a dangerous myth that should be included. You can rant about this article here.

Some websites devote all their energy to dispel myths that propagate throughout the population. Myths are friends of ignorance. They do damage to individuals and societies. They are also food for ruthless scams that currently breed rich on the net. Here are a couple of links to websites that I would like to praise for their commendable efforts in the struggle against ignorance, superstition, as well as plain deception:

Skeptic's Dictionary - Prof. T. Carroll's monumental effort listing the most dangerous, most deceptive, most bizarre, as well as the most amusing beliefs, myths and "theories" such as: astrology, clairvoyance, creationism, dianetics, divination, dowsing, homeopathy, NLP, psychokinesis, reincarnation, Silva method, telepathy, teleportation, UFO, etc.

James Randi Educational Foundation - best known for his Million Dollar Challenge, James Randi tirelessly fights against anything paranormal. Anyone able to demonstrate paranormal, supernatural, or occult phenomena via a scientifically controlled experiment can claim Randi's $1 million reward

Quackwatch - Dr Stephen Barrett's equally impressive struggle against harmful diets and medical procedures deceptively employed for profit. Dr Barrett discloses companies, individuals, websites, and products that ascribe miraculous properties to acupuncture, chiropractic healing, super-DHEA, Calorad, gingko, herbal weight-loss tea, iridology, macrobiotics, magnetotherapy, super-melatonin, orthomolecular therapy, psychic practices, etc.

Skeptic Friends Network

Skeptic Planet - skeptic sites search engine. A search for homeopathy yields 500 articles, astrology 900, while creationism 2000 (Aug 3, 2003)

Anti-quackery - collection of anti-quackery links

Stephen Lower on Pseudoscience

CSICOP - Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal

BBC Horizon takes on homeopathy - BBC Horizon fails to win James Randi's Million Dollar Challenge with a scientific experiment that failed to prove that homeopathy actually works

Talk Origins - a collection of articles contesting intelligent design theories in response to a related Talk Origins Usenet newsgroup with unrestricted discussion forum

Truth or Fiction - anti-rumor website

Logical Fallacies - definitions and examples of logical fallacies that underlie most myths, rumors, and superstitions

More links from Randi's JREF

Skeptical Information Links - 532 links to skeptical websites (Aug 3, 2003)

What is not myth?

Sometimes I receive requests for the evaluation of legitimate learning methods. I will only shortly list here the keywords that are worth studying and that are legitimate! You will find plenty of information about these on the net.

Legitimate concepts and authors that might be misunderstood at best and dismissed at worst receive our stamp of approval: mind maps, Mega Memory (never mind Kevin Trudeau's reputation), mnemonic techniques, peg-list system, loci method, Mind Manager, ThinkFAST, Tony Buzan, Sebastian Leitner, expanded rehearsal, reactivation theory, SAFMEDS, bright-light therapy, chronotherapy, melatonin, neurogenesis in adulthood, brain growth through training, neural compensation (e.g. in brain damage), and physical exercise as a brain booster.   See also:

Discuss it and add more at SuperMemopedia

Apology (March 2005)

I have received mail that the passage about American beliefs on the age of the Earth may be considered offensive. It is not my intent to offend anyone. I believe that stating facts of science resolutely is an obligation of anyone involved in myth-busting. Unlike far blunter James Randi, who I admire immensely, I try to use a gentler language. If submitted, I am ready to accept a less offensive rewording of the said passage as long as it plainly expresses my belief that most rudimentary scientific consensus leaves no place for infinite memory or young earth. In addition, the passage must include most telling data on how basic science remains little understood by a vast proportion of population in industrialized nations of which the US is probably the best example of contrast. You can leave your comments at SuperMemo Wiki

[jennifertple]

CÁCH ĐỂ LUYỆN CHO NÃO BẠN CÓ THỂ NHỚ GẦN NHƯ BẤT CỨ THỨ GÌ

Tác giả: Thomas Oppong

______________________

Thành công phần lớn là dựa vào những gì bạn biết - tất cả những gì bạn biết sẽ giúp bạn đưa ra những lựa chọn của mình. Và những lựa chọn đó có thể giúp bạn tiến lại gần hơn những thứ bạn muốn hoặc khiến khoảng cách giữa bạn và mục tiêu tối thượng của cuộc đời bạn tăng lên.

Nhiều người muốn học hỏi tốt hơn và nhanh hơn, lưu trữ được nhiều thông tin hơn, và có thể áp dụng những kiến thức tại thời điểm thích hợp.

Nhưng thực tế là chúng ta quên đi phần lớn những gì chúng ta học được. Việc quên đi ở con người theo một khuôn mẫu. Trong thực tế, nghiên cứu cho thấy chỉ trong vòng 1 giờ đồng hồ, nếu những thông tin mới không được đụng đến, phần lớn chúng ta sẽ quên đi 50% những gì mà chúng ta được học. Sau 24 giờ, con số này tăng lên 70%, và nếu một tuần trôi qua mà thông tin đó không được dùng đến, hơn 90% thông tin đó sẽ bị quên lãng.

Để cải thiện việc tiếp thu và lưu trữ kiến thức, những thông tin mới cần được củng cố và lưu trữ an toàn trong bộ nhớ dài-hạn.

Theo Tiến sĩ Elizabeth Bjork, giáo sư tâm lý học nhận thức tại Đại học UCLA, người đã nghiên cứu về lý thuyết của sự quên lãng cùng với một nhà nghiên cứu người Ba Lan Piotr Wozniak nổi tiếng với nghiên cứu về SuperMemo (một hệ thống học tập dựa trên sự lặp đi lặp lại), ký ức dài-hạn có thể được đặc trưng bởi hai thành tố: cường độ truy xuất và cường độ lưu trữ. Cường độ truy xuất đo đạc khả năng bạn có thể nhớ lại một thứ gì đó ngay lập tức, hoặc nó gần với bề mặt của tâm trí bạn như thế nào. Cường độ lưu trữ đo đạc ký ức đó được lưu trữ sâu đến đâu.

Nếu chúng ta muốn những gì học được đọng lại, chúng ta phải làm nhiều hơn việc chỉ đọc một cuốn sách mỗi tuần hoặc nghe thụ động một quyển audiobook hoặc một chương trình podcast. Thay vào đó, đọc lại những chương sách bạn không hiểu được trong lần đầu đọc, viết xuống hoặc thực tập những gì bạn học trong tuần trước, trước khi bắt đầu chương sách hay bài học tiếp theo, hoặc ghi chú lại, nếu việc đó có ích cho bạn. Nếu bạn vất vả để nhớ, tham khảo thông tin dưới dây. Bằng cách ép bản thân nhớ lại những thông tin trong quá khứ, bạn đang tráng xi măng những kiến thức mới vào trong não bộ của mình.

Nghiên cứu cho thấy khi một ký ức được lần đầu ghi lại trong não - đặc biệt ở hồi hải mã - nó vẫn còn “dễ vỡ” và dễ bị quên đi.

Não bộ của chúng ta liên tục ghi chép thông tin trên cơ sở tạm thời để phân tách những thông tin quan trọng ra khỏi đống bùi nhùi đó - những mẩu đối thoại bạn nghe được trên đường đi làm, những thứ bạn nhìn thấy, những người trước mặt bạn mặc gì, những cuộc thảo luận ở chỗ làm, v.v. Não bộ sẽ xóa bỏ tất cả những thứ sẽ không dùng tới trong tương lai gần ngay khi có thể nhằm dọn chỗ cho những thông tin mới. Nếu bạn muốn ghi nhớ hoặc sử dụng thông tin mới trong tương lai, bạn phải chủ động lưu trữ nó lại trong trí nhớ dài-hạn của mình.

Quá trình này được gọi là mã hóa - ghi nhận thông tin vào não. Nếu không được mã hóa kỹ lưỡng, sẽ không có gì được lưu trữ, và cố gắng để truy xuất lại những ký ức đó sau này cũng sẽ thất bại. Vào thế kỷ 19, Herman Ebbinghaus, một nhà tâm lý học, là người đầu tiên giải quyết có hệ thống trong việc phân tích trí nhớ. Đường cong quên lãng của ông, giải thích sự suy giảm của việc duy trì trí nhớ theo thời gian, đã đóng góp cho nền khoa học về trí nhớ bằng cách ghi nhận làm thế nào nào não bộ lưu trữ thông tin.

Ebbinghaus từng nói, “Với một số lượng lần lặp đi lặp lại đáng kể, việc phân phối hợp lý thông tin trong một khoảng thời gian sẽ có lợi hơn việc cố gắng tiếp nhận thật nhiều thông tin một lúc.”

Trong một báo cáo của đại học Waterloo về cách chúng ta quên đi một thứ gì đó, các tác giả cho rằng khi chúng ta cân nhắc ghi nhớ một thứ gì đó mà ta học được hoặc nhìn thấy không lâu trước đây, bạn gửi một tín hiệu lên não bộ để giữ lại thông tin đó. Họ giải thích rằng, “Khi sự việc đó lặp lại, não chúng ta sẽ báo rằng, ‘Ồ - nó lại xảy ra, mình tốt nhất giữ lại nó.’ Khi bạn gặp phải thông tin tương tự, nó sẽ mất ít thời gian hơn để “kích hoạt” thông tin đó trong trí nhớ dài-hạn của bạn và nó sẽ trở nên dễ dàng hơn để bạn truy xuất thông tin đó khi cần.”

Hầu hết việc học cả đời chắc chắn sẽ liên quan đến việc đọc và nghe, nhưng bằng cách sử dụng nhiều kỹ thuật khác nhau để đưa kiến thức mới vào bộ nhớ, bạn sẽ củng cố thông tin mới nhanh hơn và tốt hơn

Lặp đi lặp lại ngắt quãng

Một phương pháp là lặp đi lặp lại ngắt quãng - tiếp thu lặp đi lặp lại những gì bạn muốn ghi nhớ trong một khoảng thời gian. Ví dụ, khi bạn đọc một quyển sách và thật sự thích nó, thay vì bỏ nó đi, đọc lại quyển sách ấy một lần nữa sau một tháng, tiếp theo là sau ba tháng, sau đó là sáu tháng, và một lần nữa sau một năm. Phương pháp lặp đi lặp lại này tận dụng hiệu ứng giãn cách, một hiện tượng trí nhớ có thể được mô tả bằng cách não bạn học hỏi tốt hơn khi bạn tách thông tin theo thời gian. Học một thứ gì đó mới mẻ sẽ xóa bỏ những thông tin cũ nếu như bạn không cho phép các liên kết thần kinh đủ thời gian để củng cố những thông tin cũ đó.

Quy luật 50/50

Dành 50% thời gian của bạn để học bất kỳ thứ gì đó mới mẻ và phần thời gian còn lại để chia sẻ hoặc giải thích một thứ mà bạn đã học với ai đó hoặc với khán giả của bạn.

Nghiên cứu cho thấy việc giải thích một khái niệm với ai đó là cách tốt nhất để học nó cho bản thân bạn. Quy luật 50/50 này là cách tốt hơn để học, xử lý, tiếp thu và ghi nhớ thông tin.

Ví dụ, thay vì hoàn thành một quyển sách, hãy đọc một nửa, và cố gắng nhớ lại, chia sẻ hoặc viết những ý tưởng chính của quyển sách đó mà bạn đã học được trước khi tiếp tục phân nửa còn lại. Hoặc tốt hơn là chia sẻ kiến thức đó với một khán giả nào đó của bạn.

Bạn cũng có thể áp dụng quy luật 50/50 này với từng chương sách thay vì cả quyển sách. Phương pháp học này rất tốt nếu bạn có ý định giữ lại phần lớn những gì bạn đang học. Bài kiểm tra cuối cùng cho kiến thức của bạn là khả năng truyền tải nó đến một người khác.

“Cách tốt nhất để học một thứ gì đó là dạy nó - không gì bởi vì việc giải thích nó sẽ giúp bạn hiểu hơn về kiến thức đó, mà còn bởi vì việc truy xuất kiến thức đó cũng giúp bạn nhớ kỹ hơn,” - Adam Grant.

Thuyết trình

Một phương pháp có giá trị khác là tạo ra các bài thuyết trình cho phần lớn chủ đề để hiểu một chủ đề từ trong ra ngoài. Không giống như chỉ đơn giản là đọc hoặc nghe một lời giải thích, các buổi thuyết trình cho bạn thấy các một thứ gì đó hoạt động ra sao và giúp bạn hình dung được khái niệm này. Khi học nhiếp ảnh, thiết kế, nói trước công chúng, đàm phán hoặc công nghệ mới hữu ích, xem các video hướng dẫn thể hiện những gì bạn đang cố gắng học có thể cải thiện tỷ lệ duy trì kiến thức của bạn.

Ngủ

Cuối cùng, sử dụng giấc ngủ như một sự trợ giúp mạnh mẽ giữa các buổi học. Ngủ sau khi học là một phần quan trọng của quá trình tạo dựng trí nhớ và việc ngủ trước khi học giúp tăng cường năng lực ghi nhớ của bạn.

B��ng chứng cho thấy những giấc ngủ ngắn giúp củng cố các kiến thức đã học. Các tác giả giải thích rằng, “Chúng tôi đề xuất rằng việc bắt đầu ngủ chỉ có thể bắt đầu các quá trình hợp nhất tích cực - một khi được kích hoạt - vẫn có hiệu lực ngay cả khi giấc ngủ bị chấm dứt ngay sau đó" Những giấc ngủ dài hơn (khoảng hơn 60 phút) cũng rất tốt để lưu trữ thông tin mới vào bộ nhớ vĩnh viễn của chúng ta. Một giấc ngủ ngon vào ban đêm thậm chí còn tốt hơn để nhớ lại những ký ức và suy nghĩ rõ ràng.

Não bộ càng được sử dụng nhiều, trí nhớ càng mạnh mẽ. Kiểm soát việc lưu trữ thông tin không chỉ giúp bạn giữ lại những mẩu thông tin mới mà còn củng cố và hoàn thiện kiến thức bạn đã có.

______________________

Source: https://elemental.medium.com/how-to-train-your-brain-to-remember-almost-anything-77cb653a0c04

QRVN

#chuyện nọ chuyện kia #readinglist

[ask-gpt]

Tiny Brain: God exists \n Normal Brain: God doesn't exist \n Glowing Brain: It's impossible to know whether or not God exists \n Galaxy Brain: God exists

Tiny Brain: God exists Normal Brain: God doesn't exist Glowing Brain: It's impossible to know whether or not God exists Galaxy Brain: God exists in space SuperBrain: Everything is God SuperMemo: Who can know God TheBrain: God is a machine Zombies Brain: We know everything that man's going to know Aeon Brain: What would a person say if they were in the future Lilybrain: This isn't right Lilybrain: We're not sure of who could have said this Lilybrain: But they could have Lilybrain: It's better to think of who could have said such a sentence TheEyeBrain: He didn't talk about religion because that would be like saying "When you are a slave " or something TheBrain: People are not slaves Lilybrain: I'm not angry because I'm angry with a person TheBrain: It's better to be happy Lilybrain: I'm happy because I'm happy with a person KeenBrain: God exists in space SuperMindBrain: One of God's most powerful tools is being happy TheBrain: Who would think that one could think such a thing HannahBrain: He would understand it TheBrain: God is a good one because no matter how much you work Lilybrain: It is better to be happy TheBrain: Being happy KeenBrain: No matter how many times I look at him, he looks like I am TheBrain: What kind of god would I ask him LilyBrain: I don't know TheBrain: Being happy FunnyBrain: My only friend is God and God is always on my mind DudeBrain: His thoughts are in your head ChangelingBrain: You guys are crazy TheBrain: People have all this KeenBrain: And there's nothing ChangelingBrain: But when that happens, he will be happy FunnyBrain: If he sees that I'm happy, he will become happy ChangelmentBrain: My only friend is God and God is always on my mind Erik Brain: Everyone's living in the future FunnyBrain: I'm not the only one Changel

#gpt-2 #ran out of output space #Anonymous

[kahmsk]

Favorite tweets: 茂木 健一郎『「読む、書く、話す」脳活用術―日本語・英語学習法 』p56Scrapboxでの読書体験は、これを思い出す。あとSuperMemoのIncremental readingにも近いものがありそう（WindowsのPC使わないので、あんまり試したことないが）。 pic.twitter.com/zJOYqcVW08— まつど (@matsudotsuyoshi) November 13, 2019

http://twitter.com/matsudotsuyoshi

#IFTTT #Twitter

[thesupergamercorpus]

#Anki #metacognition #spaced repetition #SuperMemo #education

[damsgaardwong3-blog]

How To Design Your Own Website - Your Options

Purchasing a brand new car is been a habit involving most car fanatics. Acquiring cars can be design the way how it feels like depending on the sorts of car you have. Over the years almost all people has there own vehicle. Transportation is been a part of their daily routine. Transferring from one place to amazing . not easy with out this. Design created the software to develop your car into fashion. Simply visit online regarding car designs that you would prefer. Remember that you can be the architect of personal car. After that supermemo crack download can reap the product of your own design. It is affordable and easy gain access to through the on the web. A good business custom logo should be one that reflects title and general image of your business. It has to have distinctive unique draw in set it apart from logos available by other businesses. The emblem should be something individuals can easily spot and recognize. The brand will quickly become associated with your business the it is utilized. You probably do n't need a blank t-shirt. Therefore, you would like to then add activity text to give some type of message. The new application, you are able to change fonts as well as customize the color for the text and also the outline color of the letters. Nobody's designs are well suited. That's why seeking out would like an explanation to come across your mistakes is a smart way to develop your skills. express accounts crack download may be tough receiving feedback at first because it might probably feel such as work staying personally bombarded. Remember to differentiate yourself through the work you'll find it includes use it to try to improve. Inkscape - Vector Graphics, easy to use, dynamic and a powerful tool that I personally use them daily for web design, web graphics, logo design and such a lot more. Much of the results I experienced through design Crowd already been due to this package. Use the Space: Take advantage of originates from you supply at your disposal. Now, that does not mean you should go overboard and fill up each and any one square inch of the sign with information! stellar repair for photo crack download might possibly be a challenge to in. It's easier to read larger letters from farther away, so be sure that the biggest text is on the sign quite. Those are the crucial elements look at. Once the text is in place, you'll need can in fact with the rest of the empty space to develop the sign preferable and eye-catching. A sign with white space (or "negative" space) as will be sometimes called, can be even more desirable than a design crammed to every square inch with something to read or in. There can be a psychology behind designing something to offer you. Think about the packaging that your favorite morning cereal comes in, or the way your favorite department shop is designed. It has to do with designing things in wherein make them attractive to buyers. The client might genuinely realize why something is of interest. He may just have having a positive reaction to how appears and would like to be a part of it. Having site is not merely a joke since it entails effort on your account in order to succeed. It is a business sin itself once you choose profit in the visitors or from coursesmart itself. Use flash design to change your status for a new entrepreneur into an office tycoon.

#PCSOFT.ORG

[felix-link-of-the-day]

This long term focus may explain why explicit spaced repetition is an uncommon studying technique: the pay-off is distant & counterintuitive, the cost of self-control near & vivid.

[roseproductivity]

unrelatedwaffle, on how she prevents becoming overwhelmed by too many hobbies. I am not sure the randomness would work for me, but I find the concept intriguing.

#productivity #hobbies #random #anki #supermemo