Some non vegan told me I was "sheltered" because I didn't understand that plants are "just as alive as animals" and like if you can't see the difference between eating a 9 month old calf (veal a byproduct of dairy) and eating an apple then I you're beyond help.
57 notes
·
View notes
I do fr think the white leftists who hardcore hate vegans mostly are trying to absolve their own guilt or unresolved feelings about eating meat and animal products
126 notes
·
View notes
non-vegans frequently justify their indifference towards non-human animals by portraying vegans and vegetarians as inherently predisposed to love animals, as if compassion for animals is just an innate trait that people either possess or lack. but one thing that 6 years of veganism have taught me is that compassion (for animals) is a skill that can be cultivated and nurtured.
by actively trying to emphasize with the experiences, desires and fears of non-human animals, you can develop compassion for them. you can learn to value their lives and wellbeing more.
this can of course be greatly helped by trying not to exploit them anymore, as this will decrease your cognitive dissonance and allow you to explore this area more honestly and authentically
23 notes
·
View notes
List 5 things that make you happy, then put this in the askbox for the last 10 people who reblogged something from you to get to know your mutuals and followers
(hello dear friend, tell me of your latest little joys please 🧡)
thank youuu for sending this along 🌱 i had an excellent time thinking of these!
swimming 😌 being by nature an anxious little beast i love anything that will cushion Bad Sensory Things (loud, warm) in cool, smooth nothingness. huge fan. submerge me in cool water at any given moment i'm going to love it
the neighbourhood cats
sending & receiving mail! i love stationery and i love handwriting things, and it always feels wonderful to be reminded someone's thinking of you
against my better judgement, peanut butter?
the spot on top of the hill where i go to read :') it's a different kind of stunning in each season.
8 notes
·
View notes
~Adobo Tofu~
Ingredients:
1 block of extra firm tofu, pressed
• For marinade:
2 Tbs or 1 oz of adobo marinade base. I used Chef merito's "Adobo Carne al pastor" (there's recipes on how to make this at home online if you're up for a challenge just look up adobo chorzo sauce)
1/2 tsp of better than bouillon vegetable base
1 3/4 cups (i used my empty bouillon jar but its about a cup) of water
• For cooking:
~1 Tbs Corn starch for dusting, if you want
1 Tbs garlic olive oil (if you dont have this you could add a dash of garlic powder to your pan with regular oil, or omit it)
1 Tbs coconut oil (or canola / olive oil doesn't matter that much
Add a little more olive oil if this isn't enough I didn't actually measure anything lol
Instructions:
Press the tofu with your method of choice for at least 20 mins, this isn't strictly necessary but I find it makes the tofu much easter to cut into neat cubes later. It also soaks up more flavor from the marinade.
Chop tofu into 7 ~1/2 inch size slices across the block and place slightly separated into an airtight tupperware container or a small bowl that can be covered.
Add adobo paste to the bowl, or combine with the water and bouillon then pour over the tofu and add enough water so it's mostly covered.
Let sit in the fridge overnight or at least a couple hours.
Once it's done marinating, pour the marinade off or set it aside for cooking into rice (it's a great side for this!) and chop your slices into 8ths (makes about 56 little cubes, varies on how big your tofu block is)
Dust your chopped tofu with cornstarch, this helps them crisp up around the edges better.
Once your tofu is starched up to your liking, add the oil to your pan or Wok and put it on medium heat. Add tofu once the oil is hot and cook for 15 minutes turning every 1-3 minutes to get an even fry.
↓Pictures!↓
(plated up with rice cooked with a bit of the leftover marinade and a dollop of vegan sour cream)
11 notes
·
View notes
the wildest thing about that sautéing vegetables & the horrors that be post blowing up (over 100k notes? somehow? now?) is seeing people just randomly take it away with #vegan in the tags… like. well. i guess so
84 notes
·
View notes
I don't think the desert island argument is a valid criticism of veganism, but I think it could potentially be used as a valid criticism of the idea that all lives are equal. If you were on a desert island with a child and you had to kill animals to feed the child, many people, including vegans, would say this is morally necessary and the 'right' thing to do. So this would mean that all lives are not equal. You could say the child is only more valuable to you subjectively, and is not objectively
worth any more than the animals you kill to feed them. But in that case, does valuing the child’s life more than the animals’ really give you the right to kill them? Who says that your values are any more important than the animals’ values, who probably value their lives more than they value the child’s? The child’s life must objectively be more important, otherwise I’m not sure killing the animals to save the child can be justified?
The first thing to recognise is that value judgements, in the ethical sense, are always subjective. Such a thing cannot be measured or argued objectively. That said, there are really two different questions at play here:
1) Are human and non-human animal lives of equal value?
2) Do you value human and non-human lives equally?
These answers can both be different. You can believe that humans are superior to non-human animals, but value the life of your beloved pet over that of a fascist. You can believe that human and non-human lives are equally valuable, yet still value your own life more than theirs, to the point where you may kill them in a survival situation. There is nothing logically inconsistent about either position.
For your thought experiment, I don’t agree that killing the deer to feed the child means those lives are not equal, it means you value the life of the child over the deer, in the way we all tend to value our kin or members of our own group over complete strangers. This does not necessarily reflect our value judgments about those lives, or whether they are more or less valuable - all it means is that I valued that child’s life enough to kill for them. Had they been humans I’d killed, would make those other human lives less valuable? I’d argue not.
Value judgements will always be arbitrary, any attempt at reasoning them out will always end in circular logic, because it’s not a relational judgement. It’s justified only to the extent you can justify it to yourself and to others, but even had you chosen to let that child die to save the deer, your decision and your justification would be subject to the exact same criticism.
Under that outcome the question becomes: If their lives are equal, why did you let the child die? The justification for that decision would be just as arbitrary as the justification for its opposite. The only truly equal response would be to let both parties die equally, which would be even less justifiable than choosing one over the other on the basis of something arbitrary like kinship, personal sentiment or the desire to appear objective. Decisions between two equals will always be based on emotion and personal values more than logic, and so attempts to draw our logical conclusions from those decisions will always be fraught with problems.
19 notes
·
View notes
I am so fucking tired of people being like “you just have to tell everyone you’re vegan, don’t you” when I’m like “I had vegan ice cream” because it’s like “yeah, apparently I do! Because last time I said ‘I ate ice cream’ you were like ‘oh so you’re not vegan now’ and were all smug about it. make up your mind! Which answer do you want?!”
37 notes
·
View notes