It's crazy that people still uphold show!Sansa as a well-written character and pretend that liking her is the pinnacle of feminism when it would be infinitely more impactful to acknowledge her terrible and misogynistic writing. This is the same character who, while written by two men, was thankful for the abuse she suffered because it allowed her to grow. The same character who we had to be told was smart because the writers were too lazy to develop or show her intelligence. The same character who had to rely heavily on the men surrounding her and ended up accomplishing nothing on her own merit ( and no, thinking that she deserved to be Queen doesn't mean that she earned it). She is not well-written, she is not complex, and she is not a feminist character. Which is fine! If you enjoy her then good on you, but please stop pretending that she's something she isn't just because you feel the need to justify liking her character
95 notes
·
View notes
I'm not sure how to elaborate on this but Hilbert is such a fun character in the way he actively rejects redemption. He thinks he's irredeemable and has come to terms with that, but he also is desperate to avoid the responsibility that comes with actually trying to be better. He is absolutely hellbent on not changing or learning his lesson. He believes in his cause and is entirely unwilling to give it up or compromise on it. What a guy.
148 notes
·
View notes
Sunday, 1 October — The debut of the concept of "Thierrysplaining", as Hyundai Shell Mobis WRT's Thierry Neuville chats to Toyota Gazoo Racing WRT's Elfyn Evans inbetween stages at Rally Chile BIOBÍO 2023 (📸: PanoramiC/IMAGO)
24 notes
·
View notes
why craig are take over world
essay by me (craig)
As much as Craig may seem like a simple doodle of a cat, his potential for world domination should not be underestimated. Despite his crude appearance, Craig embodies the essence of adaptability and resilience, traits that are essential for any aspiring ruler.
Firstly, Craig's simplicity works to his advantage. Underestimation is a powerful tool in warfare, and many would dismiss Craig as inconsequential. However, this oversight allows Craig to operate in the shadows, biding his time until the perfect moment to strike.
Secondly, Craig's lack of defined features makes him a versatile symbol. He can represent anything from innocence to cunning, depending on the narrative spun around him. This ambiguity allows Craig to appeal to a wide range of followers, from disillusioned citizens seeking change to opportunistic power-seekers.
Thirdly, Craig's handwritten signature adds a personal touch to his endeavors. In a world increasingly dominated by digital signatures and impersonal interactions, Craig's handwritten mark harkens back to a simpler time, fostering a sense of nostalgia and authenticity among his followers.
In conclusion, Craig may appear unassuming at first glance, but beneath his simplistic exterior lies the potential for world domination. Through adaptability, versatility, and a personal touch, Craig has the tools necessary to rally followers and reshape the world in his image. Beware the power of Craig, for his ascent to global dominance may be closer than we think.
5 notes
·
View notes
I get wanting to claim that Blake's bisexuality is confirmed canon, but if you compare how the show handles canon m/f attraction to Blake's sapphic attraction, the difference is obvious
Jaune: consistently flirts with Weiss, attempts to woo her with music, wants to ask Weiss to prom, seeks advice from his team on how to pursue her
Weiss: visibly affected when Neptune calls her a cute nickname, changes her opinion on fog machines to agree with him, tries to switch mission roles to be with him, asks Neptune to prom
Pyrrha: shows interest in being on Jaune's team multiple times, visibly upset after giving Jaune dating advice to the point Nora comments "practice what you preach," shoves her tongue down Jaune's throat without his consent before sending him to safety
Nora: rambles about how she and Ren aren't together in a tone that very clearly conveys she wishes they were, reluctantly rebukes Jaune when he assumes they're a couple, declares Ren is "her man" in V6, has that weird run-around conversation about feelings in V7, shoves her tongue down his throat without his consent
Qrow: tells a story where he's taken down by a "waitress's tiny miniskirt"
Blake (m/f): doodles Adam in her book, called "my darling" by him, blatantly said by Ilia to have been chasing after him
Meanwhile...
Blake (sapphic): has no visible reaction to Ilia's confession, holds hands with Yang, visibly affected by Yang's staring after cutting her hair, goes to a dance with her, only teams up with Yang during combat
Every single m/f canon attraction, requited or otherwise, is explicitly told and shown while any queer attraction is relegated to hints and implications. This is why it's difficult to believe Blake is confirmed when she doesn't follow the pattern that's been fairly rigid for 8 seasons now
People want the show to give her and Yang the same respect they gave the straight couples, and they so easily could in a single sentence, but they haven't. That's the biggest disappointment of all
11 notes
·
View notes