There's this funny little thing that happens when you hit somewhere around your late 20s or early 30s, where you start looking at new tech and new skills and other new approaches to everyday things and your knee-jerk reaction starts to become "this is stupid, I'm getting by just fine without this, why should I have to? Hell, why should ANYONE use this new thing?" even when learning to use it would take maybe a week of practice that would gain you several years if not a lifetime of daily life being much, much easier.
What no one tells you is that it's easy to miss this mental transition because stupid inventions and trends come and go all the damned time - you probably rejected several even as a kid. As such, it becomes hard to tell the "I don't want to waste my time and money on this because from what I can tell this is a stupid fad that will be dead in a year" that you've always experienced now and then from the "I don't want anything to do with this because I'm already comfortable with MY method to deal with this problem and I don't want to go to the trouble of learning a new skill even if it has advantages" that you're only just starting to feel. In fact, because society hates the very concept of being older than 24 so much, it's easy to not only not immediately notice the difference, but actively work to DENY it when you do notice and JUSTIFY that no, it's not that you're getting set in your ways, but that the new way is objectively worse overall, because the alternative to that claim is admitting that you're getting older.
This is largely a benign mental pattern and in fact can even be used for good if you're willing to acknowledge it for what it is - you can then make INFORMED comparisons of the strengths and drawbacks of both old and new approaches - but if you let it run away with you, this is how you turn into the rude old man at the library who blames the librarian for the fact that he forgot his email password.
Don't let it turn you into that guy.
48 notes
·
View notes
Prompt 279
Now Danny didn’t mean to make a Bootube channel. He’d meant to send that sleep deprived ramble to Tucker, but he had clicked on the wrong app and yeah. Apparently people enjoy his space rambles- or it could have been the ghost blob-cats that had decided to flop onto him. (Honestly he wasn’t surprised they would start to mimic the shapes of things in their surroundings)
Tucker? Found it hilarious, as did Sam and Val and… um, okay this has become their shared channel now, nice. Though there are some strange comments on some of the videos. Really, what do they mean green sky and crazy tech???
878 notes
·
View notes
i like playing with the idea that angela is a lot more superficially human than you'd initially think. i always keep saying this but shes an animatronic to me. its really hard to actually very smoothly and cleanly simulate human movement because of how fast and coordinated each muscle is with one another. you just can't get that with motors and pistons, at least not yet.. there's always an offset and a delay that makes movements slightly janky which is why animatronics tend to be incredibly "unsettling"
like... sure, the city could have stronger technology in that regard i say: hey i make the rules now
i mean, her appearance as designed by ayin is superficial, shes meant to be a hyper-idealized replica of someone she's never met [if her design and her pronounced chest is anything to go off of] might as well take that one step further right. especially with things like eating without any sensation of taste which seem to simply just be for the sake of ayin finding some pleasure in companionship [incredibly self indulgent and almost borderline voyeuristic]. i wouldn't be surprised if angela didn't even have a proper tongue to begin with . its all half baked ideas that really collect into seperating angela from being "truly human"
its ok though shes just autistic. trust
10 notes
·
View notes
While I'm talking about misinformation online, let's talk about a factor I don't see acknowledged nearly enough in how it spreads: trust.
I've spent a lot of time studying how to tell a reliable source from an unreliable one. I've taken all the quizzes on the matter I've found. I've even caught and written about a few that were biased as all hell - meta-usage of that skill!
And yet I admit to having believed online misinformation from time to time.
Why?
Because it was shared by someone I knew and trusted.
Problem was, they shared it from someone THEY knew and trusted, who shared it from someone they knew and trusted, who shared it from someone they knew and trusted, who shared it from their friend who they didn't realize was in the early, reasonable-sounding-propaganda stages of being recruited into some fucked up internet pyramid scheme-cult hybrid or something like that.
This is why Discord scam bots like to hijack real users' accounts. This is why hijacking real users' accounts is a malware strategy that dates back to early email viruses. It's a form of sneaky social engineering - we just don't question things that both align with our preexisting beliefs AND are said by someone we know and trust. In fact, by starting on a small, "fine details" level, trust can be used to change someone's worldview, for better or for worse - this is one of the two biggest factors as to why shared interests can be used as a tool for radicalization, right up there with the fact that we tend to develop a sort of metaphorical tunnel vision around things we're passionate about.
The thing is, this is one of the hardest pitfalls to avoid. Even if I consciously know better, even if I know my friends are just as inclined to make this assumption as I am, and so are their friends, and so are their friends' friends, I still catch myself assuming, ah, yeah, I'm sure my friend did their due diligence and isn't accidentally spreading bullshit! Liked and shared!
...except, no. No, everyone else is just as prone to that bias as I am. Just because I'm pretty sure my friends and mutuals all know better than to click on some shady Ray-Bans sale link "a friend" DMed us doesn't mean we're all perfect fact-checkers.
The point of all this is - remember that misinformation isn't just a Stupid People Problem. Your friends can fall for it. You can fall for it. It's very, VERY likely that, at some point in your life, you'll fall for it BECAUSE a friend of yours fell for it, and you trusted that friend. That doesn't make you A Bad Person, nor does it make you stupid for trusting that friend, nor does it make that friend stupid - it means the misinformation sharing machine worked as designed.
The most important thing to do is to recognize this fact and be willing to accept the reality when verifiably corrected.
34 notes
·
View notes
dicks should not exist. everybody should have a pussy and that's all.
6 notes
·
View notes
in honour of the coronation i will be rereading several discworld books, specifically the ones featuring samuel vimes, starting with guards! guards!
8 notes
·
View notes