Pamamaroo Sunset
This article first appeared in the December 2023 – January 2024 issue of Australian Photography magazine – after the editor asked me to be the featured member of the Australian Photographic Society, on the APS One Frame pages.
As published
As an enthusiast pro-am photographer for almost 73 years, my interests and approaches have changed and evolved. Nowadays I mostly seek to create Contemporary…
View On WordPress
0 notes
The Best Guide to Panasonic Lumix S Lenses for Photographers
Looking for a great lens for the full-frame Panasonic lineup of cameras?
The L mount has been around for many years. And with Panasonic’s additions to the system, photographers can enjoy a plethora of optics to choose from. If you’re looking for only full frame cameras, then Panasonic Lumix S lenses are what you’re looking for. They often provide a great balance between optical performance, autofocus speed, and build quality. They all boast weather resistance and, on…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f4-6.3 VR Lens
Buy Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f4-6.3 VR Lens online in London at the best price and is ideal for best photography. Also check out the features and specifications.
0 notes
NO WAR Comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF) (Jan. 28, 2023) stacked 24 images of ISO 12800, 1.3sec., F2.8 CANON EOS 6D mark II and EF 200mm F2.8 LII
92 notes
·
View notes
Sony RX100 VII Thoughts After Two Months
PROS:
Stacked sensors are the future. Well, technically the present considering that Canon, Nikon, Sony, Fuji, and OM Systems all use stacked sensors in their top of the line cameras. Either way, finally getting to experience shooting with one on a daily basis has made me want one in pretty much any camera going forward. The benefits are twofold: Not only do you get shutter speeds up to 20 frames per second, and without a mechanical shutter flipping in the way obscuring your view in between shots, but you also get no rolling shutter while doing it. Pretty much every Sony camera can shoot 10 fps bursts with the silent shutter, but any movement can give you a jello-like effect since the sensor reads out so slow on non-stacked cameras. The only con, at least on this camera, is that you can’t shoot flash at higher than 1/100 with the electronic shutter. That’s still plenty fast for a lot of stuff, but well below the 1/2000 you get when shooting the mechanical shutter.
The fast frame rate wouldn’t make much of a difference if the camera was bad at autofocusing, but this camera is great at it. It has a lot of the same fancy focusing stuff that my full frame Sony has like human/animal eye autofocus and all the tracking modes I’m used to. It actually makes the camera pretty solid for wildlife if you can get close enough at the 200mm end.
Speaking of that, the 24-200mm equivalent is a great range, and one that I missed a lot since I traded away my Tamron 28-200 to help cover the cost of my A7RIV. The small size and extra 4mm on the wide end actually makes it even more convenient than that Tamron.
Aside from covering a broader range than the 24-70 equivalent lens from the older RX100 cameras, this lens also seems noticeably sharper. The last RX100 model I had, the Mk. IV, just didn’t seem as crispy as this lens is.
It has a touchscreen! It’s wild to think that the previous RX100 cameras I owned didn’t have this basic ass feature, but Sony was very late in putting touch screens in their cameras. Ironically, I don’t really use it in this one because the AF is good enough that I can just do focus and recompose with tracking.
CONS:
It’s still only a 1” style sensor so high ISO isn’t the cameras strong suit. Programs like DXO PureRAW help a lot and let you get somewhat usable images at ISO 6400 in a pinch, but you’re kinda pushing things at that point.
While the lens is sharper and covers a wider range than the older models, it’s also significantly slower. At 24mm equivalent it’s already at f/2.8 where the old cameras were f/1.8. It’s f/3.2 at 25mm, f/3.5 at 33mm, and f/4 at 40mm. From 109mm to 200mm you’re at f/4.5. The relative slowness of the lens combined with the small sensor means that this can struggle getting quality images in low light without a tripod or something.
No USB-C. My Fuji, Ricoh, and larger Sony all have USB-C charging, which is amazingly convenient when traveling. I haven’t really gone anywhere with this camera yet, but having to account for a micro USB cable is annoying since pretty much everything aside from my iPhone uses USB-C.
It’s expensive. Just like my Mk III and Mk IV I got it used so it was cheaper than retail, but the copy I got cost about twice what I paid for the previous models.
Start up time is just a tad bit slower than I’d like. The GRIII and X100V both beat it that regards, albeit those aren’t zoom lens so I have to cut the Sony some slack.
SAMPLE PHOTOS:
(The sample photos were edited in Lightroom Classic and DXO PureRAW2. Also, the sensor creates a roughly 2.7x crop factor, so the 9-72mm lens equates to 24-200ish)
Young Bird | ISO 160. 72mm. f/4.5. 1/200.
Graffiti Shot from a Car | ISO 100. 33.98mm. f/4. 1/400.
Stickers | ISO 100. 29.67mm. f/4.5. 1/100.
City Hall | ISO 100. 38.13mm. f/4.5. 1/200.
Flip Up Screen Selfie with My Friend Hanae | ISO 3200. 9mm. f/2.8. 1/40.
Zoomed in Graffiti | ISO 640. 72mm. f/4.5. 1/500.
Fishing Store Neon | ISO 800. 28.67mm. f/8. 1/200.
Flowers | ISO 200. 72mm. f/5. 1/640.
Selfie Shots with My Sister | ISO 3200. 9mm. f/2.8. 1/100.
28 notes
·
View notes