Tumgik
#But I digress.
thegreatyin · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
STOP STOP IM ALREADY DEAD!!!!!!!
54 notes · View notes
vigilskeep · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
you guys know this stuff is like word for word angel and fallen angel behaviour right tell me you know this. like obviously much of it is different but all the building blocks
26 notes · View notes
scattered-winter · 9 months
Note
You know, another thing that always bugged me about VLD is the shape Keith’s Bayard takes.
Tumblr media
People always calls it a sword, but honestly it’s more similar to a katar, a type of Indian push dagger. Which is the same overall design as Pidge’s Bayard.
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
It’s weird that Pidge and Keith both use the same weapon as the base for the form their Bayards take, but Pidge’s has a lot more utility with both its grappling hook and taser functions.
YEAHHH I've noticed how keith's bayard is a katar (ancient weaponry autism go brrrr) and I actually think that works really, really, really well for him. (I'm drawing from Autism Research that I did several years ago so I may be misremembering in which case I'm sorry </3) but iirc, a katar has a lot of power in the forward thrust (because the blade is lined up with the user's arm, so he can put his whole weight into a thrust) but they can also be used for swinging/slashing which is generally what keith's fighting style tends to lean toward. additionally, because traditional katar don't really have a lot of blocking protection on the hilt (unlike a zweihander, for example, which has a pretty useful crossguard) for someone to use a katar they have to be pretty quick and light on their feet to compensate for not having as many defensible qualities. which sounds a lot like keith's fighting style to me. katar are pretty versatile and rely on the intensity and power of their design/technique to punch through an opponent's armor and take them down as efficiently as possible, which just fits keith soooooooo well imo
and for pidge, I also really like her bayard because it reflects her personality and fighting style incredibly well, too. it's probably one of the most versatile weapons used in the entire show with its grappling hook, and the taser adds another range of uses (there's the obvious shocking, but I also remember seeing her use it to cut through hulls and things like that) and for a green paladin who thinks outside the box, a weapon that can be used in so many ways works so well. to address the similarities between pidge's and keith's, I actually think it might just be because of the shape of the bayards themselves. the only other two bayards we see take gun forms, so pidge and keith are the only ones with melee weapons which makes it hard to really tell if that handle shape is the norm for bayards or if it's just their unique personalities. but regardless, the H-shaped handle (the main characteristic in katar) is what all the bayards have in their dormant forms, so it might just be a matter of functionality that the handles for keith and pidge's weapons are also H-shaped
Tumblr media
38 notes · View notes
helreginn · 2 months
Note
(Hel and em(6'4") and hel and felet(5'8")) Send 📐 + your character's height to compare with one or more of mine!
Send 📐 + your character's height to compare with one or more of mine!
Tumblr media
Short Queen!
11 notes · View notes
blueiight · 9 months
Text
idk if i want viktor ina show cuz its like… claudia is their only heir.. viktor is like lestat on the rocks, so we couldve seen , vicariously, a mortal life prospect of lestat, but viktor’s also made a vampire (at the same age lestat was turned!! the cycles girl.) cuz it was the vampire book of ruth meets theosophy + they are being sheparded to the promised land (chateau de lioncourt). but so much of it is. just me thinking. claudia is their only child to me. stuntin like my daddy lil wayne ft birdman.mp4
37 notes · View notes
osoreruna · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
the first day toshinori was able to step foot outside of might tower and not be recognized by a single person the ENTIRE DAY — it did something to him...
10 notes · View notes
datastate · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
isn’t this your fantasy?
73 notes · View notes
spacegoathours · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
@drawile’s OCs are the best, I couldn’t just draw one of ‘em for artfight 😌✨
21 notes · View notes
im-still-a-robot · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
This is why god hates him. No other reason.
6 notes · View notes
shima-draws · 1 year
Text
I finished watching RTTE and I am. Emotional
Tumblr media
28 notes · View notes
encrucijada · 5 months
Text
i haven't been able to write in days but i have a new oc to play dolls with my friends because i got possessed and started watching game of thrones
7 notes · View notes
prettytragcdies · 2 months
Note
would you hold my hand? (julia & suzanne)
andsanctify
No words were necessary between the two sisters as Suzanne slipped her hand into Julia's and squeezed it for reassurance. Why history had chosen to repeat itself in such a cruel way, she had no idea. Not a lot was making sense right now, but one thing was for sure. She was going to be there for her big sister and spare her whatever burdens she could. Suzanne Sugarbaker might have come across as just another shallow, conceited beauty queen to some people, but in times of crisis, she had time and time again proven herself to be a modern day Scarlett O'Hara.
Unfortunately, this time it wasn't going to be as easy as making a deal with God over by the candy machine in a hospital waiting room.
"We don't have to go inside until you're ready. We can just stand over here, and you take as long as you need."
3 notes · View notes
the-acid-pear · 4 days
Text
I'm a davesport shipper and dave apologist to the grave and back (no pun intended) but i do have to admit Jimbo's words about him echo in the back of my head.
2 notes · View notes
nuclearspring · 12 days
Text
thinking about a timeline in which benny actually just pulls off an independent new vegas thanks to a little luck and perseverance and a sufficiently dead mailman
6 notes · View notes
fideidefenswhore · 5 months
Note
My understanding is that when the Princes died in 1483, Elizabeth of York was technically heir to the throne but no one actually considered installing her as Queen Regnant as the system just wasn't set up for that. And yet 70 years later, being a woman didn't seem such a big deal (in comparison) and everyone's major concern was the female heir's religion. Do you think that was nothing but the fluke of all Edward VI's available heirs being women (no one, afaik, thought of skipping all of them for Darnley say) or was there also something about the upheaval in Henry's reign that changed perceptions of female rule, even if subconsciously? I'm not saying it was an ideal situation, but the fact it became even feasible, compared to less than a century ago, I find really interesting. I was thinking that, given how long it took for Henry to have a male heir, and the Pilgrimage of Grace's call for Mary to be reinstated, plus her initial popularity as queen, maybe the average person had accepted by c 1527 that they would have a queen next, and even that kind of uncharted territory was preferable to all the turmoil that came trying to get a male heir. I mean, to many people, Mary becoming queen was probably better than losing the social safety net monasteries provided. And with Katherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn, no matter if you hated them, they were both impressive, resilient figures so maybe people expected their daughters would be the same.
Imo, it wasn't really a 'fluke' insofar as it was that (although there was some instability in the order changing...at first Elizabeth at the total exclusion of Mary, and then the total exclusion of both, and then the inclusion of both, but with Mary over Elizabeth) Mary and Elizabeth had both been made heirs to the throne by Acts of Parliament, and several Henrician measures had greatly strengthened the power of Parliament by that point. The final Act of Succession included Edward, Mary, and Elizabeth, and their heirs. Beyond this, Henry's will did include the proviso that if all of the above died, the throne would pass to the heirs of Frances Grey (but not Frances herself...), and that if all these heirs died, the throne would pass to the heirs of Eleanor Clifford. Margaret Tudor's lineage was not present as potential heirs in either his will or this final Act, and so it doesn't seem Darnley as heir was ever really...bruited.
I was thinking that, given how long it took for Henry to have a male heir, and the Pilgrimage of Grace's call for Mary to be reinstated, plus her initial popularity as queen, maybe the average person had accepted by c 1527 that they would have a queen next, and even that kind of uncharted territory was preferable to all the turmoil that came trying to get a male heir. I mean, to many people, Mary becoming queen was probably better than losing the social safety net monasteries provided.
I mean, I think this depended. The average person, even the average professed religious person, as this book I've been reading recently has argued (Dissolution of the Monasteries, by Clark), also accepted the English supremacy without demur. Entertaining the counterfactual of essentially, what if Henry sat on his hands re: (male) succession 1527-... the court divisions would probably have centered around what marriage alliance their Princess should enter. Or, separate court factions would have emerged supporting Fitzroy versus Mary. The matter wouldn't have necessarily 'settled', even if Henry had been more indecisive about it, for longer.
Those two weren't really inextricably linked, though? Dissolution of the religious houses began on a smaller scale while Princess Mary was still heir, under Wolsey's auspices. Their examination and valuation took place while she had yet to swear to the Oaths, which strengthened her position abroad and emboldened her adherents, the Act for the Dissolution of Smaller Monasteries took place during this period, as well. Their pace was likely to continue regardless of whatever outcome came from her either signing, as she did, the Oaths, or whether she did not.
Tl; dr, while Mary's reinstatement was included on their list of demands, it wasn't necessarily seen in the mind of every person that the Dissolution had only come about due to her disinheritance, particularly because Elizabeth was enshrined as heir two years prior by Parliament, which effectively disinherited Mary.
Again, it would depend on who you asked, there would have also been many that said 'turmoil' over the quest for a legitimate prince was a far better alternative than civil war (especially as it came to pass, and no interdict on trade was actually imposed as consequence for Henry and sundry of pretty much every level of government below him, flipping the bird at the papal briefs being sent). I've mentioned this before, but the Act enshrining Elizabeth as Princess and heir apparent passed by the House of Lords and the House of Commons, which could not have happened had there not been an overall majority vote for both. And in 1536, the Act which barred Mary and Elizabeth from the throne on the grounds of illegitimacy, and vested it in the future children of Henry VIII & Jane Seymour (or any future wife), passed in the same manner. So, as much as this is said to demonstrate that the popular belief was that one Princess was much the same as another, but that Mary would of course always be preferred...well, was it true to the extent that it's argued, that simply wouldn't have passed in Parliament.
I don't think their capability of rule was really assumed based on the characters of their mothers, persay? More that the court factions of their mothers did survive (well, several of them did, several did not), in some sense and form, they made up much of Mary I's adherents and Elizabeth's protectors (mainly, of her maternal family) during the Marian era, and later her own adherents during the Elizabethan era. There was always still the sense that male inheritance was preferred, to wit:
❝ By mid-January 1554, the many rumours circulating about the proposed four-pronged uprising against Mary frequently mentioned Elizabeth’s name. One conspirator thought that although ‘we ought not have a woman bear the sword…[but] if a woman bear a sword, Lady Elizabeth ought to bear it first.’ -Elizabeth I ,Richards, Judith M.
Regardless of whether the person in question was either an adherent of Mary or Elizabeth, that caveat ('a woman ought not to bear the sword [if it could be helped]' or some variation thereof) was almost always either explictly given or implicit. Many of the similar statements recorded during the Henrician era, of dissidents who said that Mary should take the throne, almost always had the detail that she should or would do this after marrying Reginald Pole, or Charles V, or some other named man with some blood claim to either the English throne or another (iirc, Ferdinand, the King of the Romans, was also mentioned, once); just as the conspirators of Wyatt's Rebellion planned for Elizabeth to wed Edward Courtenay.
4 notes · View notes
lewisiopsis · 2 years
Text
the reconcilement of “psychiatry and mental health treatments are still in their infancy, surely this asylum and descriptions of it so far allude to it being a relatively compassionate place in comparison to other institutes dealing with the mind” and the large, increasingly strong need to remove one’s slipper and smack dr. seward with it, shouting STOP TREATING PEOPLE AS LAB RATS
34 notes · View notes