Actually laughing (derogatory) because I just saw someone unironically say “btw it’s 2022 we need to stop telling people what they can and cannot identify as because you view it as ‘harmful’” and then literally the first tag was “mspec lesbians/gays DNI btw this is not about you” like....no. Go back to your desk and rewrite your paper. Read a book. Read what you WROTE out loud. All of it. And try to see how utterly asinine what you just wrote now is. Then come back to the table and discuss.
38 notes
·
View notes
Any other LGBTQ+ Headcannons that are canon is the comic??;)
*patiently awaits Cupioromantic Donnie*
hmm... had to think about this for a while and talk about it with co-author, but here's what we got. we mostly base this stuff on how plausible it is in show/if there's evidence for it. with a dash of personal experience. This only applies to residuum, btw. I have different personal headcanons for these characters outside the comic.
april: lesbian. this is mostly based off of the fact that most aprils get with their caseys & the comment she said to dale. which could be taken as disinterest in dale specifically, but she seemed more concerned with impressing that popular girl earlier and that reads as more... saphic, i suppose. or at the very least homoromantic.
raph: raph is just raph. we look at him and basically just *tv static*. go crazy. all we got is jokes or stuff that has too little evidence to support. so, yeah, he's whatever you want him to be i guess?
leo: trans. already said my reason in the other post. also, gay. if gay were a power source he could power the entirety of the united states for five months straight without a single power outage. failing power grid notwithstanding (< thats the actual word. its supposed to be mushed together like that. wack.).
donnie: as much as i'd like him to be ace/aro spectrum rep, he just doesn't have the evidence in show for us to apply it to him in this comic. it's funny, for being hc as ace so often he sure is the most outwardly romantic/sexual turtle in the show lmao. one! cherry: "you're so cute, but you're so mean! why do i always go for your type?" two! astrogirl?? (whatever her name is) he is very very romantic with her. he has a type y'all. also just look at those two, he's a leg man lmao (bootyyshaker9000 anyone? ha!) anyway. and with the bromance/instant chemistry he had with that one guy in the purple dragons... Pan. or possibly Omni as he does seem to favor... cute brutal femme... Yeah. Omnisexual.
(you have no idea how fucking bad i want this boy to be ace spectrum. hes got the colors y'all!! The Colors!!!!! but alas... i am bound by my canon plausibility creed for this comic)
mikey: ace. possibly ace/aro. he shows interest in literally no-one. we're aware that the common hc is pan but... we know a pan 13 year old, and let me tell you ahahahaha, kids going through puberty are very uncomfortable to be around sometimes, especially around their partners. or crushes. and mikey... well, that boy is ace behavior personified lmao. aces in the back you get what we mean right?? right??? anyway commiting to aroace
469 notes
·
View notes
hey, uh, its ok to headcanon characters as ace!
it is even okay to headcanon traumatized characters as ace!
gay, lesbian, bisexual, or pansexual characters can also be ace!
asexuals can also, in fact, still find people attractive! what a concept!
it doesn't hurt anyone to let people have ace headcanons!!!
65 notes
·
View notes
sksw zelink is gay
42 notes
·
View notes
Being an aro/ace and having people tell me characters who come off as strongly aro/ace are just being in denial of their feelings makes me want to punch a hole in a wall. That and people saying or implying character can’t possibly be asexual because they’re too hot/sexy for that.
If a character was in denial of their feelings for someone then I think a writer or artist would blatantly convey that for the reader or viewer to pick up on.
I have an aro/ace character of my own who is exactly like that. A character who has strong feelings for one person, but fears too much to be in love with them because she believes too much that they’ll reject her because of who she is and it eats at her constantly. So instead she tries to keep them pushed away because she feels they deserve better. You would see it in her face, you would see it in her behavior and brought up multiple times even if it’s in her own mind. You would KNOW that her heart was aching over it yet refusing to give in to her feelings. That is denial of feelings and still being aro/ace! What a concept!
Not a character clearly displaying no feelings at all if not showing that they’re extremely uncomfortable and outright shutting down any advances towards them, never to be brought up again. That’s an aro/ace genuinely not giving a single fuck.
7 notes
·
View notes
I love bitchy gays
22 notes
·
View notes
there’s something i really want to know about sex repulsion but i don’t know if there’s a way to ask about what i want to know without it ending up being rude
10 notes
·
View notes
i really hate how people on the internet handle straight relationships in media sometimes, like theres nothing wrong with having headcannons that make a cishet relationship more queer but god people will go through such great lengths to ignore the fact that you can be in a straight relationship and still be queer..
12 notes
·
View notes
why was everyone posting abt ace discourse a few hours ago It is 2023 . that is a 2018 discourse. why do you still care. like i have my opinions on it but its literally pointless to discuss bc no one in real life gives a fuck
7 notes
·
View notes
if you're deconstructing your ideas of binary gender and binary sex— you also have to deconstruct your ideas of binary sexuality and romantic attraction, too, fyi
18 notes
·
View notes
2023 reads // twitter thread
Love Letters For Joy
YA contemporary Cyrano de Bergerac retelling
an ace girl with cerebral palsy who’s determined to be valedictorian, with only her academic rival to beat
when her friends start pairing up, she starts to wonder if she wants something like that, and emails the anonymous romance advice email going around her school
16 notes
·
View notes
i really do want more recognition for aromanticism outside of asexuality, it feels like an afterthought identity to most people, like 'oh also you might be aromantic if you're asexual'
9 notes
·
View notes
it is interesting to me that ive seen lately (n yknow this is subjective and likely not any real social force just what ive seen) many queer people simultaneously talking about taking back and embodying unpalatable and ‘unmarketable’ queerness (the recent return to the terms faggot and transsexual come to mind) which i think is pretty evidently shaped by the conservative moment were in of demonizing queer ppl and especially gnc and trans people as predators--it reads as a return to queer isolationism in the face of external hostility, imo--while at the same time ive seen a lot of rallying around the “original” 6 stripe rainbow flag as opposed to any of the purportedly ‘factional’ flags of different queer identities, with the assumption being different identity flags divide us while the rainbow flag encompasses everyone and its kinda fascinating to me bc the rainbow flag is probably the single most marketable and palatable and uncontroversial symbols of queerness which has been seamlessly uptaken by those who wish to sell it back to us as gets pointed out every pride month with all the cringey pride merch....
i dunno you could maybe take that as a point of hypocrisy and claim the queer community is itself in a conservative moment rn where its returning to a sense of history and historical continuity (perhaps even out of that sense of external threat) or even that the queer community has for some time been in a conservative moment given the like, decade of identity discourse and lashing out at any people deemed to not have a sufficiently established history or however we should categorize the bihets/ace discourse/transtrender-tucute discourse/pan discourse/bi lesbians discourse (because lets be frank its essentially all the same discourse just keeping up its momentum by leapfroging from one target to the next) which i think is, like, SOMEWHAT true but not entirely?
its more interesting to me, in any case, as an expression of a conflict the queer community is facing given that current state of affairs RE antitransness and that very recent history. like, the simultaneous need to retreat to a safe sense of community which is welcoming to the very things the outer world is demonizing ie mutable gender, complex or contradictory experiences of gender, gender expression which is hostile to the cis binary, but also the ways in which it has to grapple with those discourses which have largely defined the community infighting for again the past decade. its queer people begging the question ‘how can we make the queer community welcoming to the girlfags and genderfucks and tboys who are being threatened when we have spent so much time making the queer community a hostile place for anyone with a non-conventional or not easily (or even just palatably) sortable sense of queer identity’. and the answer it seems to be grappling with at the moment is like, welcoming all that diversity of experience but being absolutely averse to naming it. yes we love all the fuckery with gender and sexuality never be marketable but like, ew, why are you calling yourself [insert microlabel here]. you can be genderweird but you cant call yourself genderweird. you can only exist as queer in the broadest possible way (the all-inclusive gay pride flag!) but if you try to name the specifics or use those identity labels weve been fighting over for years youre doing it wrong (the progress pride flag is now ugly and cringey and ‘too much’). i think theres something also to the way (at least on this site) transmisogynistic discourses have really taken hold as legitimate (though yknow i wont downplay how much a problem transmisogyny has like. always been in queer spaces no matter what) in the name of protecting n defending trans people. like its just regurgitated transmisogyny but its being mobilized supposedly in the service of helping trans people. idk its definitely getting a little late for me to string this together fully coherently but theres a throughline there, in the ways certain ideas are being consolidated and reified as ‘yes were more progressive now!’ when i think theres definitely something to question there in terms of like...are we? are we actually? are we doing better by the people were trying to help or are we setting strict standards and forcing ppl to adhere to them again?
21 notes
·
View notes
all this arguing over who can or can’t be a lesbian. honestly. what are you, straight?
7 notes
·
View notes