Star Trek Interactions and Fanfics
The results are in, as per this post. Data on interactions in shows is from TrekViz based on episode transcripts from Chakoteya, and fanfic data is based on works on AO3 tagged 'Character/Character' and/or 'Character & Character'.
For character pairs to analyze, I went through the top twenty relationship tags on AO3 for each series (TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY, and ENT), discounting those that had more than two characters or included characters not in the TrekViz data, and combining '/' and '&'. That left: 8 characters in 9 pairs for TOS, 10 characters in 13 pairs for TNG, 16 characters in 14 pairs for DS9, 7 characters in 10 pairs for VOY, and 7 characters in 12 pairs for ENT.
A comparison of number of interactions and number of works is presented as a table, as well as a graph with linear regression.
Correlation coefficients are 0.9106 for TOS, 0.0243 for TNG, -0.0130 for DS9, 0.6793 for VOY, and 0.2310 for ENT. Swapping straight counts out for percentages (number of interactions/works for a given pair divided by the total number for the respective series) gives an overall correlation of 0.4814. (Correlation coefficients range form -1 to 1, with the closer to 0, the less of a correlation; 1 is a perfect positive correlation and -1 is a perfect negative correlation)
Overall, about 48% of the variation in number of works for a given pair can be explained by variation in the number of interactions. TOS has the greatest correlation - both the show and fanfic are about as equally focused on the triumvirate. Next highest is for VOY, with the two biggest outliers are Chakotay and Janeway being about as overrepresented as Janeway and Tuvok are underrepresented. Then there's ENT, with just about the only thing note of being that technically Hoshi/Reed is just barely overrepresented. TNG just barely has a positive correlation. DS9 has even less of a correlation, but stands out in being the only negative correlation of the lot. To the surprise of I'm sure no one, this is pretty much single-handedly due to Bashir/Garak. Individual graphs with labelled data points for each show (with percentages) are below the cut.
39 notes
·
View notes
Fanbinding: Like a Wildfire Burning by @werewolves-are-real
It's illogical to deprive the body of necessary nutrition, but old habits can be hard to break.
Before I left for the holidays back in Dec, I made a whole bunch of books, and four of them were for and in-person meet-up for a class with other Renegaders!
I bound "Like a Wildfire Burning" (on Ao3) for @pleasantboatpress since they love Star Trek & Spock. It's a Spock-centric fic, focused on his struggle with an eating disorder and being caught between two cultures.
For design, I researched to translate "Wildfire burning" into Vulcan and then how to write it in Vulcan calligraphy (back). The fabric is Colibri copper, and the endpapers are a chiyogami I picked up down in Kyoto. I found a great smoke vector that I was able to play with for the title and first pages. I went for a gold splatter on the edges.
Honestly though the best part of making this book has been being able to meet and hang out with manda in person!!
241 notes
·
View notes
so I have been thinking about why I hated the Spock Is Turned Human episode of SNW so much and I think I've nailed it down
cause like. Vulcans are a specific flavour of autistic, right?
Throughout 60 years of Star Trek, and particularly through Strange New Worlds, we've had it impressed on us that Vulcans absolutely do not feel less than humans. On the contrary, the reason that Vulcans prize logic, ritual and objectivity is that their emotions are deeply intense and overwhelming. In fact, like one episode prior and in the fuckin. Previously On... for this episode, Spock's saying "Vulcan emotion is too intense to handle and what might happen if I don't suppress it scares me."
It's made repeatedly, explicitly, clear that Vulcan emotional detachment is a choice and a cultural practise. It's made directly clear as well that Vulcans don't experience the world as less intense or emotional than humans; they work from birth to suppress it, it's a learned practice.
And they've leant into this really hard elsewhere in SNW! They've talked about Vulcans choosing to reject logic and act on emotion, Spock's seasons-long arc is about his fear of his own emotions - he's even specifically brought up that he hasn't undergone Kolinahr and therefore is suppressing his emotional state only through conscious practice.
but this episode. is a story about someone who's physiologically less able to feel being "humanised" - experiencing touch, taste, laughter and feeling more strongly than they have before.
That's a Data story. Not a Spock one.
Like I get what they're trying to do - push Spock into dealing directly with his human side, empathise with Amanda's strength, etc - but the way they do it conflicts really directly with everything we know about Vulcans, and also kind of confirms Vulcan bias against Spock's humanity by establishing that yes actually regardless of upbringing humans just Are Wired Wrong for Vulcan society. which is weird actually because both Amanda and Michael, humans raised outside Vulcan, can handle Vulcan societal expectations, but Spock, raised fully in the culture, struggles to and has to have everything explained to him.
And also the way they do it I found really uncomfortable and, you know, dehumanising. We're shown a version of Spock who isn't managing his emotions through discipline and will, but who just Doesn't Have Them That Much and, when given the Normal amount of feelings, goes hog wild and is functionally a child with no self-control.
There's a scene where they explicitly say he's functionally a teenager! As if he's not already been through a human adolescence!
Everyone of every species, not just human, is suddenly lecturing him on the nature of Feeling Things, which he receives as new information! despite the fact we know that managing his emotions has been a constant struggle for Spock! and we know that Spock (like other Vulcans) likes food and music and has a sense of humour and experiences friendship and anger and frustration and love.
and I think it speaks to a deeply neuronormative kind of infantalisation - he isn't reacting to emotion the way Normal (here: human) people do so it must be because he doesn't feel it at all. he isn't vegetarian he just hasn't experienced how Bacon bacon is. he isn't suppressing his distress it just isn't there. he doesn't have a different cultural relationship to humour he just Can't Laugh.
like the 'inhuman entity experiences human emotion' plotline is a Star Trek classic and it's usually a fun time - it's fun with Q and with Data and with Odo et al. but it doesn't work with Spock because we know that Vulcans aren't less physiologically capable of emotion than humans, they're less culturally willing to engage with emotion. And that's specifically because they're more sensitive to strong feeling than humans.
like yeah this is nerd griping, but it's also just very galling from an autistic perspective (the same way that having Spock go bacon-mad this episode seems to have been pretty galling from a Jewish perspective). Something that's always been very resonant about Vulcans and Spock specifically with a lot of autistic people is that experience of feeling things so deeply and strongly that you have to develop a sometimes overly-strict discipline of emotional management and cut yourself off from them entirely, and it is often mistaken by those around you as being unfeeling or numb. And the way Spock is portrayed consistently acknowledges that that's not what it is, that it's an (often maladaptive but necessary) practice that's active work in order to fit into a society that doesn't have space for the scale of your emotions or where your emotions might be a risk. And that you can learn to retain the parts that help you but still make close emotional connections through that barrier.
Idk this episode doesn't understand Vulcans which is really frustrating particularly for an episode entirely about Vulcans. It doesn't make sense that being turned human would fully undermine Spock's ability to behave as Vulcan the way it does unless your position is that Vulcans are inherently more numb to feeling than humans, which is explicitly not the case - and the message of the end of the episode partially rests on the idea that it's bigoted to assume his humanity makes him less Vulcan, especially since Amanda is able to perform Vulcanness well, except the entire precept of the episode and its shenanigans are that his humanity does intrinsically prevent him performing his cultural heritage properly and make him irrational and reactive. Like, the episode's failure to understand Why Vulcans Work doesn't just conflict with the rest of the show, it also leaves this episode a chaotic mess cause A doesn't in any way feed into B.
also unrelatedly T'Pring Did Nothing Wrong and she's so right, Spock is a wee bitch.
26 notes
·
View notes
Star Trek Episode IMDb Ratings 01/23
It's a new year, with new episodes and new data to play around with, as well as a convenient break in new episode releases. Therefore, my fellow nerds, let us gather 'round for more statistical analyses of Star Trek episode ratings.
I've done this twice before, in July of 2021 and April of 2022. You can look there for a more complete introduction. Basically, I used Python to scrape IMDb data on episode ratings for Star Trek, applied some stats, and am presenting the results.
On the broadest level, the average Star Trek episode is rated 7.36 (SD 0.82, IQR 0.9), continuing a downward trend from previous times. More details under the cut.
Analyzing series by series, Prodigy is keeping its throne as the highest rated series at 7.99, and The Animated Series its much less illustrious title of lowest rated series at 6.56. The greatest standard deviation is still The Next Generation at 0.94, and the lowest is The Animated Series at 0.46, although Prodigy is close behind at 0.48. The average for each series (with standard deviation in parentheses) is below:
TOS: 7.35 (0.80)
TAS: 6.56 (0.46)
TNG: 7.32 (0.94)
DS9: 7.48 (0.78)
VOY: 7.32 (0.73)
ENT: 7.49 (0.69)
DIS: 6.83 (0.86)
PIC: 7.12 (0.84)
LWD: 7.74 (0.56)
PRO: 7.99 (0.48)
SNW: 7.90 (0.78)
Compared to last time, the biggest changes are Discovery and Lower Decks each increasing by 0.06, Prodigy increasing by 0.11, and Picard decreasing by 0.25. Of those, only Discovery hasn't had new episodes released since last time, potentially indicating that more positive reviews come later on. Now, I'm not saying that Disco episodes have been the victim of negative review bombing shortly after release, but I'm not not saying it either.
Weighting the averages by number of votes doesn't do much, although Discovery and Picard both get notable increases. The difference between average and weighted average for each show is below:
TOS: +0.10
TAS: +0.03
TNG: +0.10
DS9: +0.06
VOY: +0.05
ENT: +0.01
DIS: +0.21
PIC: +0.17
LWD: -0.06
PRO: -0.12
SNW: -0.03
Breaking things down by season, the average Star Trek show has an average season rating progression of 7.34 - 7.17 - 7.31 - 7.23 - 7.55 - 7.52 - 7.42. The highest rated season is Prodigy's first season at 7.99, and the lowest is Discovery's fourth season at 5.63, an increase from its 5.52 rating last time. Season by season stats for all the shows are below:
TOS: 7.65 - 7.46 - 6.85
TAS: 6.59 - 6.48
TNG: 6.76 - 6.87 - 7.53 - 7.54 - 7.59 - 7.67 - 7.17
DS9: 6.96 - 7.33 - 7.42 - 7.66 - 7.62 - 7.60 - 7.63
VOY: 7.08 - 7.11 - 7.21 - 7.57 - 7.45 - 7.28 - 7.47
ENT: 7.24 - 7.37 - 7.67 - 7.74
DIS: 7.49 - 7.42 - 6.63 - 5.63
PIC: 7.59 - 6.64
LWD: 7.49 - 7.85 - 7.87
PRO: 7.99
SNW: 7.90
The highest and lowest rated episodes of the franchise haven't changed, with "Shades of Gray" at the bottom (3.3, down from 3.4 last time) and "The Inner Light" and "In the Pale Moonlight" sharing the top spot at 9.4. The lowest and highest rated episodes for each series are:
TOS: "And the Children Shall Lead" (5.2), "The City on the Edge of Forever" (9.2)
TAS: "The Magicks of Megas-Tu" (5.9), "Yesteryear" (8.0)
TNG: "Shades of Gray" (3.3), "The Inner Light" (9.4)
DS9: "Let He Who is Without Sin…" (5.5), "In the Pale Moonlight" (9.4)
VOY: "The Fight" (5.0), "Blink of an Eye" (9.0)
ENT: "These Are the Voyages…" (5.3), "Twilight" (8.6)
DIS: "All is Possible" (5.1), "Such Sweet Sorrow, Part 2" and "If Memory Serves" (8.2)
PIC: "Monsters" (5.4), "Nepenthe" (8.3)
LWD: "Second Contact" (6.8), "No Small Parts" and "wej Duj" and "First First Contact" and "Hear All, Trust Nothing" (8.7)
PRO: "Starstruck" (7.2), "Supernova, Part 1" (8.9)
SNW: "The Elysian Kingdom" (6.1), "A Quality of Mercy" (9.1)
Shout out to Lower Decks for having four episodes tie for highest rated.
For each series, relative opinions haven't changed for TOS, TAS, TNG, Voyager, Enterprise, or Picard. DS9's "Meridian" is no longer tied for lowest rated, "If Memory Serves" joins "Such Sweet Sorrow, Part 2" for the highest rated episodes of Discovery, "No Small Parts" and "Hear All, Trust Nothing" join the highest rated episodes of Lower Decks, and "Supernova, Part 1" takes over from "A Moral Star, Part 2" as the highest rated episode of Prodigy.
The average Star Trek episode receives 2342 votes (SD 1123, IQR 1392). For each series, the average number of votes (standard deviation in parentheses) is:
TOS: 3495 (802)
TAS: 678 (103)
TNG: 3207 (793)
DS9: 1950 (376)
VOY: 1772 (277)
ENT: 1578 (360)
DIS: 3677 (1328)
PIC: 3754 (1201)
LWD: 941 (34)
PRO: 289 (147)
SNW: 3475 (638)
The highest is Picard at 3754, and Discovery has the greatest standard deviation at 1328. The lowest is Prodigy at 289, and Lower Decks has the lowest standard deviation at 34.
I think the biggest conclusion here is that more of y'all should be watching Prodigy! It's the least popular based on votes, yet the highest rated series.
For more info on raw data or the scraping code, contact me.
14 notes
·
View notes