I just said this in a reply, but more concise genre thought: This is the only medieval fantasy novel I've ever read where it's an EARLY -- as in Dark Ages, 600-1100 AD -- medieval fantasy (hilarious genre implications) and it's an incredible ride. I keep telling friends it's like reading Pratchett and catching the puns and references and entire retellings and knowing you've missed stuff that's going to suddenly become clear 10 years from now while you yell.
80 notes
·
View notes
was not expecting this Quran commentary to call out Martin Luther by name as a negative influence on theology. he's officially been roasted by all religions now probably
68 notes
·
View notes
@greggs-mistflower, this is *your* fault...! :)
Via the comments here:
I really can't justify asking her to put in effort to make a classic romance cover too. A shirtless Herewiss (with extra blacksmithing muscles) bending Freelorn backwards, about to kiss him. The title would be better as "Flaming Love".
What, you mean like this?
(adding a cut so that no one gets scandalized*)
Just an experiment, mostly about sorting out the lighting.
...Which is a bit too flat. I made the mistake of turning up the outside-the-forge light from the sky too high, and as a result lost considerable modeling on the figures. (shrug) Oh well... we learn by doing. I'll turn that down on the next pass and restore the original in-room lighting.
Also possibly make Lorn's shirt a little more diaphanous... because why not, if we've shoved him into that particular role.** (snicker) And make that bend-back deeper. ...And see about some other minor changes. For example: where the hell have their pinkies gone? I must have adjusted those four or five times. Make sure everybody's eyes are pointing in the right direction, and doublecheck their expressions. (Too often the figures in bodice-ripper poses have a tendency to look a little, well, constipated.) Mess around with the fire (which I borrowed from another set, the much-loved Red Crow Inn, and just chucked into that space to see what it would do for the lighting.)
*But see also one of the local operating principles: "Make 'em laugh. Make 'em cry. Make 'em wait." :)
**An amused comment from the background: "I am reliably informed that I am versatile. Next time I expect to be the one doing the bending-back."
59 notes
·
View notes
THE WEIRD AL-CANA - 04. THE EMPEROR- DOG EAT DOG
---
on the other hand, the emperor is the 'masculine' card and all about things like authority and structure, which I think works very well for our funny business boy here. this one made me very excited purely because I love the david byrne Big Suit so getting to honor it here was fun :)
[Prev Card]
102 notes
·
View notes
I'll never forgive Don Mancini for a lot of things he's done on Chucky, but I think the most angering one is probably making the one (most obviously) autistic-coded child turn evil.
55 notes
·
View notes
genuine question but is there any fandom where a character is well written by the majority. im thinking about fandom culture and the spread of frustration when people dont write characters well but. honestly in all the fandoms ive been in there's only like, a Select number of authors who i trust to write Well, let alone write Well AND In Character. character analysis and writing and getting inside characters' heads are all separate skills (all of which are trained by roleplaying fyi can CONFIRM playing pretend with your friends is good for you). there's been more than once where I've disagreed with an interpretation that others agreed with, and then I turned out wrong. or i turned out right. like it doesnt matter WHO is right it just matters that differences in character analysis exist, so even if you DO write well AND write in character, your in character is still going to be someone else's out of character
there's this sort of. vibe. that to play in the sandbox you Need to be able to make a castle, and if you can't make a castle then you shouldn't bother, and it completely dismisses the idea that youre in that sandbox to PLAY in the first place. there's this Weight of disappointing someone if you can't build something that they like, but that forgets that you aren't there to build them a castle. like, be KIND. if you disagree with someone then please make an effort to do so kindly. i dont give a shit about fandom discourse but there is a reason kids get removed from sandboxes if they keep throwing sand in people's eyes. but if they don't like your misshapen sand pile, then youre not obligated to change it. even if you yourself end up hating that same sand pile later- youre not building a legacy. youre playing. and sometimes the result of that play is out of character drivel. theres a reason there are so many authors and so few who i like to consistently read and thats because everyone is Fucking Around in their hobby space.
hash tag brag or whatever but i can build castles. ive built several that im v proud of. ive also dug holes in the sand for fun and then tripped on them when trying to get up. I often dug a hole and then got up and fucking- whoops, its a castle now, and i didn't realize i'd made something to be proud of until after the fact. the whole time while creating shit i was Convinced it was bullshit that didn't make sense. and then other times i was Convinced it was bullshit and then i was Right and i can look back and go. huh. ew. but it doesn't matter what the end result was, because i had fun playing in the sandbox
this wasn't meant to turn into a ramble but i have Feelings about bad art and art that's badly perceived and how public perception can screw with your head and how making art youre proud of is fucking. it's so difficult!!! it's hard!! it's really fun, which is why i try to make it, but i promise you it is Okay to not tryhard creativity. even if you CAN, it's okay not to do it all the time. or ever, even. fuck around find out have fun etc
11 notes
·
View notes
Philosophical ask game: Sophia Hess/Emma Barnes. Whichever you’d prefer.
SEND ME A WILDBOW CHARACTER YOU LOVE. I WILL TELL YOU WHICH PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT EXPERIMENT YOU SHOULD GET REALLY OPINIONATED ABOUT (SLASH DEVELOP A PSYCHOSEXUAL FIXATION ON)
Fans of Sophia Hess and the rest of the Trio should read Three Versions of Judas by Jorge Luis Borges!
What do I get to be in this story, besides a monster? What purpose do I serve outside of tormenting the savior, bringing her down so she can rise up? My name is an insult, my image invoked to curse at, and yet nothing would've been possible had I not been there. Was I not a key part of the one path, the great plan for salvation? They talk about how the savior sacrificed themselves for everyone. But she got up again to live a second life. The great plan needed someone damned for all time, and I've gotten no resurrection. Tell me whose sacrifice was greater.
(Other answers here)
20 notes
·
View notes