Some of the evidence supporting Mike not being in love with El is brutal. No, but seriously.
In s3, when El's leg is injured, instead of Mike putting his arm around her waist, allowing him to take some of the weight off her injured leg, he puts his arm around her shoulder, basically having the exact opposite affect of taking the weight off of her, instead just adding more weight for her to have to carry.
Now, I’m not coming at Mike here, I’m actually coming at the writers, because this choice here has everything to do with them using this gesture to signal Mike’s lack of feelings for El, even at the expense of realism.
I say this bc any person with common sense, including Finn and everyone around him and Millie filming these shots, would've known it looked unnatural for Mike to be adding more weight onto El as opposed to taking some off of her.
This means that what Mike did here, Finn was directed to do, and therefore it was for a specific reason.
And we know they could have easily made the opposite choice, because they show us Max AND Lucas doing it.
See how putting an arm around El's waist looks so much more natural? Because homegirl is injured and clearly needs help taking weight off her leg to qualm some of the pain she's experiencing there, which is why Max and Lucas are shown here doing it the correct way.
And so, why can't Mike do the same? Why are the writers making a point to show Mike being incapable of simply taking some weight off of El, instead doing the exact opposite?
I don't think it's as deep as Mike not being able to do something intimate, and that's bc, again we see Max and Lucas doing it.
I honestly think what they're trying to convey with this choice here, is that Mike thinks he's helping El, when he is in fact doing the opposite despite his best efforts. The implications of that and how that sort of aligns with their romantic relationship and what it leads to at the end of s3, going into s4, is pretty spot on.
I do think Mike thinks he's doing the right thing by being with El instead of voicing any doubts at the end of s3, because he is under the assumption that she is in love with him. I do think he believes he is indebted to her and that this is the least he can do after everything they've been through together, which has mostly been riddled with romantic pressures and so continuing that instead of disputing it seems like the only option anyways. Not to mention, he does care for her deeply, so it's not hard to imagine that he's a teenage boy confusing deep care for love (he literally tells us this is his problem when he can only say care and not love to El's face... but that's a whole other conversation).
Still, when it's all said and done, Mike's not actually doing El any favors by being with her romantically, if that is not what he truly wants.
Because that's the sad truth about all of this, which is that you would never want someone to be with you just because you want them. If you knew that they truly couldn't have those feelings for you, you'd want to know, right? You don't deserve someone just because you have deep feelings for them. And I think there's so many layers to this idea, bc many people are capable of not giving Byler a chance bc they truly believe Mike could never return Will's feelings. Will also feels this way atp, so though it hurts, he rips the band aid off, because he would never want Mike to be with him just out of pity or something. No one would want that. And so it all really comes down to who Mike truly loves romantically and wants to be with. And the right thing to do, even if it hurts someone, is to be honest, because being with them just bc you think that will make them happy is never going to be enough if you aren't truly feeling it, or worse, feel it for someone else.
We see how Mike's inability to be honest with El at the end of s3, leads to a season of Mike feeling deeply insecure and undeserving of the love El has to offer him, and even though he does try, he always comes up short. Despite Mike putting up this front that they are the perfect couple, the details are telling us something is off. And it gives him away.
Another example that I think is very similar to this loaded gesture from Mike to El in s3, is the scene in s4 when they hug in the airport.
Common sense ppl, picture this: You're reuniting with your long distance girlfriend. Then suddenly, she runs up to you, with her arms wide open, and instead of opening your arms wide to embrace her properly, you take the bouquet of flowers you brought her as a gift, and shove them against your chest just as she approaches to hug you, effectively squishing the present you got for her (a pretty delicate present at that) for no reason other than to... what exactly?
Like?? El isn't even squishing the present Mike, she's trying to hug you, dude! Your gf is trying to hug you properly and you threw the gift you got for her in between you so you could throw in a careful! x3??
Again, this has less to do with Mike's thoughts and reasoning behind this gesture in a literal sense, and more to do with the simple fact that this is a narrative choice! Mike is not a real person! There are real people sitting down and writing this and actors are having to do multiple takes to act it out. What feels natural for a situation is going to be what is often chosen 9 times out of 10, because of realism and wanting the audience to see stuff happening that is believable. That 1 time though, when it's not being done the way it would usually be, is usually because there's a specific reason for it.!
So the question really is, not why is Mike doing this, but why are the writers having Mike do this, and what message are they trying to convey about Mike's feelings based on his behavior, in these moments where he's just not capable of committing to El genuinely, one way or another?
160 notes
·
View notes
Mike’s main inner conflict is his insecurity and low self-esteem, which (in part) was provoked by being bullied all his life. That’s how they introduced his character when they pitched the show.
In s1, he had a hard time admitting to El that he was bullied but, in the end, she understood him, and he felt better for that. But then in s4, when he reminded her that he was also bullied, she shut him down.
In s3, we see how he was trying to leave his interests behind because he had grown up, and mature boys didn’t play childish games. Before the scene with his fight with Will, we have another one with Dustin telling Steve that he should date someone who enjoyed being around and not someone who made him feel cool. His fight with Will was a wake-up call; in the end, he accepted this part of himself more, but he was still a bit insecure about being childish for caring about gifts and games. We can see this in his last scene with El when he says: “sorry, I sounded like a seven years old.”
In s4, he joined Hellfire Club and embraced his geekiness. He said to Lucas that he was a nerd like it was something he didn’t care about, something that he was proud. But when Mike arrived in California, he was dressing the way he thought people in there dress up, so he could fit in. It was more like a metaphor for how he’s struggling to conform because he isn’t accepting himself, especially when it comes to his relationship with El. Because in the van scene, he opened up about his insecurities with Will. He felt like a random nerd next to El, who he had on a pedestal because she was a superhero. But Will told him that he’s the heart of the party, their leader, and the one who inspires them. Also, he assured him that he was needed, another of his insecurities. Mike wants to be able to protect the people that he loves. And even Will recognized that Mike saved him.
What is my point of this rant? It wouldn’t make sense that Mike ended up in a relationship in which he tried to conform, and not with the boy who makes him feel better about himself because he loves him just the way he is.
236 notes
·
View notes
the thing is as i may have mentioned before i'm usually not that animated by reading stuff as gay if it's just like............ nice. you know? like if it's just like two guys or two women who like each other a lot and are very affectionate towards each other, i mean depending on the context i may enjoy that as a ship, but it's not interesting to me as subtext, which is a different impulse. to find it an enriching reading of the actual text, as opposed merely a fun bonus to be silly about on the internet, the fact that these people are gay but no one's saying it like that has to be something that adds color to the portrait of what is wrong with them. so like: rayanne graff's entire Deal falls into a certain beautiful and compelling clarity if you consider she is gay and wants to fuck angela but can't and maybe can't even articulate that to herself. citizen kane, i'm not really ready to talk about this one still but iykyk. in zodiac - i mean, the actual and ultimate peak of this in the history of cinema? perhaps??? (no offense to heat @power-chords it's just that heat takes place over like a week while zodiac spans years like literally these men are being destroyed over the course of decades........). like in zodiac it's not just that robert downey jr. acts opposite every scene jake gyllenhaal so flirtatiously it's literally crazy, like sometimes when i'm lying awake at night wondering if zodiac was gay on purpose or by accident i think it has to be by accident because if rdj was doing that to be gay on purpose it's arguably borderline homophobic, it's that homophobia-induced self-repression makes jake gyllenhaal go so fucking insane he literally (maybe) solves the zodiac killings (which in itself is like i mean the whole Thing of the movie is a lack of closure so reading that thread as gay thematically reinforces what's going on in the rest of the plot which is that your entire life can be ruined forever by this thing you'll never actually be able to put into words or understand completely.......). anyway. all that is a long way of saying this is one of many reasons that succession was the greatest show of all time always and forever hallelujah amen.
15 notes
·
View notes
you ever think a lot about things that give you much to think about
[image description: a screenshot from the internet movie car database, Dean at the end of 8x01 holding his phone about to call Benny, there’s a blue truck in the background. It’s described as a 1953 Ford F-100]
[image description: a screenshot from the internet movie car database, Jack in Brokeback Mountain next to a blue and while truck with a scenic view of the mountains and water behind him, It’s described as a 1966 Ford F-100]
(for context, this is Ennis’s truck in the movie. In spn, that’s the only F-100 on screen throughout the run of the show, and it’s in a scene where Dean and Benny decide to go their separate ways. The Brokeback mountain scene is the last time Jack and Ennis see each other)
I don’t have any idea if this was purposeful, but for this truck to show up, taking up half the frame with dean, literally at the start of the brokeback purgatory arc is... something. And that a couple episodes later is the sole Brokeback Mountain reference in dialogue in the show (it’s about Sam and Dean, but w/e).
24 notes
·
View notes