#lawtube

[afewnovelideas]

I cannot believe how the Colleen Ballinger drama is shaking out right now...

She is now copyright striking LawTubers for commenting on her nonpology video. She copyright struck Natalie D Baker!

Oh I can't wait to see more LawTubers break her whole situation down. Runkle of the Bailey released a great one last night. You should watch it before it gets struck too.

#colleen ballinger #toxic gossip train #lawtube #YouTube #Emily d baker #runkle of the bailey

[naphulahastur]

First video: Ian Runkle (Runkle of the Bailey) talks about his appearance in front of the Supreme Court of Canada.

Initial thoughts, wow younger Ian looked like a nerd (lovingly). Clearly nervous but well spoken as an attorney should be. I really like how the courtroom looks, simple but regal and official. The justices also ask very good questions and politely refute some of his arguments. I love watching Supreme Court hearings anyway.

#thoughts #legal #lawtube #liveblogging #youtube

[frenchiefried]

Dude what the fuck is up with John Hopkins Hospital?!?

#john hopkins #take care of maya #john Hopkins trial #take care of maya trial #lawtube #lawblr #ethics

[viridescentfields]

I'm sorry, but all the "Law Tube" people self promoting their channels and coming up with fucking merch based on this trial are so inappropriate and fucking disgusting tbh. "what if anything" shirts, "objection hearsay" mugs, fucking poop stickers... Making money off of legal commentary is one thing, but this exploitation is simply too much. I am disgusted and disappointed that these lawyers are doing this.

#johnny depp vs amber heard #depp vs heard #Lawtube #Law Tube

[aitchque]

LawTube, It’s not a thing - for real…

This drama thing going on YouTube with these lawyers is hilarious. Some of them have definitely been on the grift while streaming the Depp v Heard trial. Personally, I wouldn’t sit on someone else’s stream for HOURS and watch them rake in bank through superchats and not partake in that. I think that’s why eventually Emily D Baker, Nate the Lawyer and Good Lawgic started doing their own streams. Why sit on Legal Bytes channel and watch her get thousands of dollars while you’re not getting anything, but a beg for a sub on their channel? UGH!

And then there’s one lawyer that’s a bit full of himself. DUI Guy. I really liked him but after the bullshit with the line holders, I decided yeah, no. I don’t wanna be bothered with him and his grandeur. I wish him well.

I realize over this drama and nonsense, I’ve unsubbed to a few of them. But I was always a Emily D Baker fan. So I’m still a Emily D Baker fan. And she is probably the one that made the most out of this. She gained thousands upon thousands of subs and a crazy amount of views. She didn’t need anyone. She didn’t need a cheerleader. That whole Hoeg thing simping for Legal Bytes was cringy. And it was such a turn off. Emily first started coming on Legal Bytes, but I think she saw she would do better if she just streamed the trial on her own channel. I think Nate the Lawyer and Good Lawgic saw it too. Why should they give all their time and attention on someone’s channel when they can do it for themselves? Good for them.

But it seemed like Uncivil Law was wholly bothered by not being able to seize on the grift. The way he started begging for subs was a weird flex for me. He could have started his own stream. Just like the others. Perhaps he was feeling he wouldn’t get the exposure on his channel vs what he was getting on Legal Bytes. Nevertheless, it’s a losing strategy to not put faith in your own abilities. Good Lawgic started out with about 100 people in this streams and it just grew when people weren’t feeling whatever was going on Legal Bytes. That’s how shit happens. But I think he was most bothered when Rob, Law & Lumber, jumped into the YouTube channel waters. Without any effort…the hard YouTube lift (which a lot of people struggle with years upon years)…came on the scene and within a month, he had over 100k subs, a video that went viral (the wooden bed video debunking) and made a bromance with Runkle of the Bailey is when I think Kurt - Uncivil Law kinda lost his shit. Rough around the edges kinda people are cool. Straight shooters are on point. But he’s little too crass for me.

Rekieta Law…he always knew and he doesn’t go on other’s channels it would appear. They come to him. He stands on his own and does his own thing. He is definitely on point.

It’s amazing how people are when more attention and more money come into play how attitudes change. I do think Legal Bytes misstated when she said something to the effect of sending people to court. I started to feel like the Legal Bytes channel became the de facto hangout for this trial, making it appear as if she was the Lawtube leader. Just my observation.

Lawtube is not a thing. It’s just a group of lawyers hoping around to other’s people’s channels during streams mostly. There are some smaller creators, like Law with Mike, Tragos Law, Boss Bri, and Natalie Lawyer Chick that also did their own thing and didn’t get too heavily mixed up with the drama and the grift. And they have really good content.

All this is just the vibe I picked up over the course of the Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard trial. Apparently a few of them streamed the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, but I don’t think it was at the magnitude of the Depp v Heard trial. It wasn’t it the same in regards to attention. I did not watch the Rittenhouse trial, but this is just the energy I’m reading from what the lawyers are saying.

I think this is what happens when a creator community forms and that creator community is attempting to appeal to the same audience as their “competitor.” Yes, there is a enough to go around, but in the end, a creator wants that audience to land on them as their bonafide go to channel.

#Lawtube #depp vs heard #Legal Bytes #Emily D Baker #YouTube #nate the lawyer #rekieta law #Hoeg Law #Uncivil Law #DUI Guy #Thoughts

[screampotato]

Watching the Rust trial and the phrase "you miss 100% of the shots you don't take" has taken on a new meaning.

#rust shooting #lawtube

[muadweeb]

im not even kidding i wouldn't hesitate to sucker punch you ao3 writer stargareed.

#asoiaf #like.....honestly i cant comprehend that there are REAL ppl like this.... #straight up writing fanfics about abuse like????? #also apparently amber is cersei here??? like what the fuck man?? #forget punching i wouldnt hesitate shooting u fr #anti johnny depp #also LAWTUBE????? that's where your fucking analysis is based on??? get a JOB get a LIFE!!!

[the-storming-sea]

very important question. what kind of youtuber/twitch streamer would the ace attorney characters be

#thestormingsea posts #ace attorney #no wrong answers except miles is a lawtuber and apollo is a law twitch streamer bc both of them popped right out the womb as lawyers #they passed the bar while in the womb #so did franziska but i dont thiink she runs a law youtube/twitch

[arctichotch]

not that I super care about the whole "watch this lawtuber" argument that's been going on, but to address this part "they’ll believe some youtuber profiting off this trial when they say the uk trial was a farce because it fits their narrative."

now idk where you get your sources from, but if it's from any articles/news sources/etc. those people all make way more than some youtuber, yet people only care and think it's corrupt if someone on youtube happens to make money from talking about the same thing that the news places make a shit ton of money talking about it.

That's really the only part that ever bothers me about these arguments so I thought I'd throw that out there.

yeah but if you look at places like idk the washington post or the nypost or the nytimes or the guardian or whatever (not naming specific ones i’ve read, just big names i can think of atm) they aren’t spewing out multiple clearly biased articles everyday and they’re not all created by one person. these youtubers get the whole profit of their content, whereas a writer writing, for example, one opinion piece in the guardian isn’t going to be making a living off that one article. but yes of course there are grifters writing about this case. but, as with anything, it’s your own job to determine if this is a reliable source or if you should disregard it due to questioning someone’s motives/inaccuracies etc.

like genuine journalism, from places with genuine credibility, doesn’t compare to some random youtube lawyer, with no credibility besides the fact he’s a lawyer, sitting at home churning out videos saying stuff that he knows will get him money with clickbaity titles because he knows his audience and that they won’t question what he is saying, because he knows he’s saying what they want to hear.

also i don’t really use news articles etc as sources unless it’s like interviews etc. i use court transcripts/audio etc. as evidence which comes straight from the source.

#idk i just don’t see how journalism compares to a lawtuber lmao #ask #anon #i stand with amber heard #cw johnny depp #just wanted to address this because i feel like we’ve gotten to a place now where people won’t/can’t evaluate sources #so idk like once again youtubers are not a source

[arosebyan0thername]

I would pay whatever they were suing each other for to never have to hear about this trial ever again, I'm so tired

#personal #whether you think its a win for male abuse victims or a loss for female abuse victims #i think it should have never been as public or as spoken about as it is #i think it should have been a private case #i think no one should have been given the right to stream it on their tiktok or their facebook page or their fucking #~lawtube~ channel which apparently exists #i think we should not be broadcasting domestic abuse related trials #because people are incapable of being normal and okay about it

[sheliafit]

Plea Deals and Todd Chrisley...

Are plea deals good or not...better for some people but not so much for others. Some people take plea deals for reasons that have nothing to do with guilt or innocence.

https://youtu.be/BejuPCml3PY

#lawtuber #legal #law and legal system #legal updates

[dejunco]

watching a lawyer just blatantly breach attorney-client privilege on TV multiple times, for a client who could go on death row for multiple homicides, is just... unreal. this dude is a CHIEF public defense attorney?!

#dej chats #watching lawtube like holy fuck #it's awful to watch #but it's also fascinating to see these things happen in the law world #where lawyers are like 'i have NEVER seen something like this happen before'

[sag-dab-sar]

Stumbled upon a show called Kids Behind Bars: Life or Parole; which follows the re-sentencing for juveniles who were sentenced to life without parole. The episodes so far genuinely show "both sides of the story" which makes it very interesting to watch. Felt the need to dedicate this to Nanna and Utu judiciary Gods, as well as Hebe Goddess of youth.

📺 Some episodes available on youtube make sure to add "full episode" if you look for it

#polytheism #paganism #levpag #helpol #tv with the gods #im now switching back and forth between this and life without people #i got wrangled into this from watching court tv which i got into from watching lawtube which i got into from depp v heard #court cam not court tv but im too lazy to retype that tag #i cant watch my airline disaster show rn but somehow murder is a-okay for my brain? #brain youre weird