Tumgik
#the goth punk billionaire
shitswiftiessay · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
imagine being that fucking rich and that fucking careless.
36K notes · View notes
charleneeeee · 3 months
Text
She is not a small town country girl.
She is a climate criminal and she does not care about you no matter how hard you may claim she does. She has created this parasocial relationship with her fans just so they can give her more money.
Taylor swift is not one of us, she is a billionaire and all billionaires deserve the absolute worst in life. She is not the exception.
191 notes · View notes
mistbyenjoy · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
“Goth punk” ok but can she do this
192 notes · View notes
purrpleowl · 3 months
Text
SO
The latest shows I've watched are Hazbin Hotel and the second Spiderverse movie (I know I'm late to the party, I have adhd, please have mercy on me) and one thing I'm finding really funny is the comparison between my favourite character from each show.
Vox and Spiderpunk.
Tumblr media
One is a capitalist who quite literally owns the souls of those under him, and the other one is an anarchist punk.
Here's for consistency! 🍻
12 notes · View notes
the-witchhunter · 6 months
Text
DP x DC Phantom Punk: We are the Outlaws
Back on my punk Danny AU
So punk is pretty anti-authoritarian, loud, fast, and contains a lot of anger, anger at how the world is. It can also be very compassionate to the downtrodden an those the system fails
You know who else has a lot of anger and compassion?
Jason Todd
Jason Todd, the second Robin, the Red Hood. The man was born to be punk.
Danny just works as a punk. His villains range from the government to a Billionaire to a ghost cop. It makes more sense than not for his experiences to have turned him in that direction, and let's face it one Sam Mason would have helped, even if punk and goth are different
So we have one dead punk boy living in a shitty apartment in Gotham, and we have another dead punk boy moving into a shitty apartment in Gotham
They're neighbors(I'd say roommates for the meme but Jay needs the added privacy)
So now we have two punks with messed up sleep schedules living next door to each other. They clearly vibe, they hang out, go to each other's apartments and Jason practically force feeds Danny a healthy meal that has enough preservatives in it to give Ra's a run for his money
Then Jason got careless
Jason, after accidentally mentioning the outlaws multiple times during a phone call, now has to deal with the fact that Danny thinks it's the band he's in. It's fine, all he has to do is play it cool, roll with it and it'll be no big deal
being unable to shut his mouth, he actually digs himself deeper. Now, Danny doesn't just want to see them play, he wants to join, and Jason has made the mistake of saying he needs to ask the band first, only to call Roy who is a little shit and goes "Yeah he can join our band."
Cut to Jason, Starfire, and a sheepish Roy scrambling to actually be a punk band as they get sucked further and further into committing to the bit
or
Fake Band au, like a fake dating au but with more people and instruments and probably ends in polyamory
2K notes · View notes
darklyndivinely · 4 months
Text
Was chatting with a friend about why I really don't like taylor. I said that she is 100% Taylor Swift (The Brand) all the time. That she has cultivated this belief in her fanbase that those who buy all her merch and albums are the true fans. So when she releases seven different versions of the same album all her fans run to buy it. Everything about her is meticulously crafted to bring in more fans and therefore, more money. There's nothing genuine about her.
And they replied that that's fine because at least she's being honest about it. She's just making money, everyone does it, why single her out.
But the thing is, it's not just about her making money. It's about her manipulating her fans to gain more of it. It's about her charging huge amounts of money for her tour film yet not giving the option to buy it, only rent. It's about her publicly dating a misogynistic piece of shit of a man, therefore, elevating and promoting him. It's about her 138 tons of carbon emissions in the past couple of months alone. It's about the nauseating parasocial relationship that her fans have with her. It's their fucked up cult-like mentality that leads them to praise and worship the ground that she walks on while bringing down anyone else who doesn't bow and raise a temple in her name. It's about her utilising and weaponizing feminism for her own selfish personal gain. It's about her absolute inability to accept and digest criticism. It's about her being named the fucking person of the year and still talking shit about her ex while calling her pop album a "goth-punk moment of female rage."
It's about her being a fucking billionaire yet not even being half a decent person.
341 notes · View notes
rottin6 · 5 months
Text
taylor swift calling reputation a “goth punk movement of female rage” is absolutely hilarious to me. you know what the goth punk movement involves? politics. it involves speaking up against a genocide and using your platform and voice for shit like this. all she’s done is use her space to make more money and become times person of the year. you cannot call yourself punk when you are a billionaire. the two things do not go hand in hand, and do not convince me that ethical billionaires exist. they do not. no one accumulates that much wealth without turning a blind eye to poor labor practices, or other unfair treatment of people in their supply chain, etc.
when we say it’s time to eat the rich, she will be a part of that. when we say hold people accountable. she will be a part of that
157 notes · View notes
snixx · 3 months
Note
we can be taylor swift haters together <3
you know i held off answering this ask for like two months because i love some of my swiftie mutuals too much and try to keep my blog mostly positive or whatever for them but um. today has done it for me im in. hell yeah lets be haters together goth punk tortured billionaire my ass she is a shitty lana del ray parody at this point
71 notes · View notes
joesalw · 4 months
Note
All of Taylor's albums were tailored to the most popular aesthetic at the time. She didn't make shit popular, she just adapted. Especially when she made the transition into pop music.
True. She's currently jumping fences with rep as well. Making it out to be a goth punk moment and using trendy words like 'female rage'. The album has the most romantic songs she's ever written. C'mon now. The whole record is electropop with some R&B elements thrown into the mix.
She portrays 'Lover' as her social justice warrior era. 'If I was a man, then I'd be the man'. Yeah, we've seen it Taylor. Miss 'me becoming a billionaire is good for the world because I'm a woman'. She makes herself out to be this 'feminist girl's girl' when in reality it couldn't be further from the truth. She's not a feminist and she doesn't want to be the woman that's advocating for women's rights and leads the path for the future generation of women. She wants to be the man at the top. Her motto is literally 'gaslight, gatekeep, girlboss, greenhouse gases'.
Another thing is her queer allyship. She's mentioned it when and only when it was profitable to her. During her tour she hadn't said a thing when the number of states signed anti-trans bills and the state of Tennessee where she says she lives *according to her own documentary* banned drag. I don't think she said anything about the anti-abortion legislation either. Her activist era started and ended in 2019.
Don't get me started on her position regarding the BLM movement. She only posted something because her own fans started calling her out and then declared that she's 'ferociously anti-racist'. She positioned herself as an advocate *by herself* and then immediately dipped when it stopped being as profitable. If you don't want to be dragged for your silence about social and political crises, don't proclaim yourself as an activist. Simple as that.
I've also seen the video on Youtube about TS being a narcissist (someone posted it on your blog earlier I think). And the guy in the video brought up her guitar teacher. So I looked him up and found an article where he talks about his experience with the Swifts which he got sued for later. According to the man, Taylor's mother was interested in him teaching her daughter how to play country music and was just a stage mom in general. And TS says that she'd been begging her parents to allow her learn how to play guitar and that she's self-taught. She wants her success story to be a rags to riches so bad I can't even.
She's a woman with an extremely fragile ego where millions of people could be praising her and a single negative comment would set her off. She can't handle any form of criticism, break ups or inconveniences like a grown woman simply because she doesn't have enough emotional intelligence to do so. Her being surrounded by yes men also doesn't help the situation. If i were her, I'd rather invest in a good therapist rather than 2 PJs. She drowns herself in work and relationships so she doesn't have time to go inwards and sit with her thoughts.
I kinda feel bad for her, honestly. She's been in the industry since she was 15 and her success was almost immediate. She doesn't know what the world's like because she's been sheltered her whole life and then had other people do things for her. I don't think she has many real friends as well. By real I mean people who aren't afraid to tell you the truth and are able to call you out in your face. Instead she has a bunch of people who appease her afraid of pissing her off and ending up on her bad side and as a result her vanity grows and she completely loses any sort of perspective whether in her friendships, romantic relationships or maybe even her own family.
I also wonder what she thinks about her fandom pirating her concert film instead of paying to rent it. I sort of hope that her fans are starting to wake up to her conning schemes. I mean, you've already made a shit ton of money from the theatre release, why charging 20$ more to RENT IT?Not even buy it. Or is it another narrative about how 'no one can own my work but me'?
This woman sells well but her cultural impact is almost nonexistent. She hadn't done any good for the world causes or inspired several generations of performers like Michael Jackson has with his philanthropic endeavors and incredible performing skills. The artists like Beyoncé, Lady Gaga, Bruno Mars, Justin Timberlake (bleh) and The Weeknd were hugely influenced by MJ. These artist create their own unique legacy and impact on their communities. Especially the ladies. Gaga's been an avid LGBT+ advocate since the beginning of her career and created a foundation that focuses on issues like self-confidence, well-being, anti-bullying, mentoring and career development. She also participated in anti HIV and AIDS campaigns, spoke against immigration laws in the US, contributed to 2011's earthquake and tsunami relief campaign in Japan. Beyoncé's a huge advocate for the black community and black women especially which always finds its way in her work and visual art in particular. She's been platforming black culture and history for her whole career (2016 Superbowl and Coachella performance are the brightest examples of black american culture and releasing her Lion King album to showcase African artists' excellence). She also has a foundation where she provides black youth scholarships, clean water for communities abroad and housing to families in need in her home state.
What exactly makes Taylor Swift's cultural impact? Thousands of tons CO2 emissions? Music labels putting a clause in the contract so the artists can't re-record their material for 10 years now instead of 5? Making several versions of the same CD or vinyl so the sales are bigger? Mind you, that's all excessive plastic and paper. Some countries and US states are banning gas stoves. Her position regarding artists being paid during the early days of streaming (when the platforms were launching with a free period tial) was right but no one really benefited from it but her. She was shitting on Apple Music, then they offered her money, filmed an ad and released her 1989 Tour DVD exclusively on their platform. She shat on Spotify, then when LWYMMD came out, she was all over their biggest playlists all of a sudden and recorded Spotify Singles later on. Spotify's always promoted her every release like a motherfucker shoving her in every corner of the platform. Especially for the past 3 years. She doesn't have any memorable outfits or unique style to be called a fashion icon either. She's not a trailblazer she thinks she is. She is only popular because a lot of people *mostly ww* who peaked in high school see themselves in her. She's average in everything she does, her writing topes are also the same (only now she started using compound or uncommonly used words to mask it) but she's extremely commercially successful so that those people can see themselves in her. She doesn't have unique music style or chameleon-like discography like Gaga, Bey, MJ, Madonna, Shakira, Kelly Clarkson, Miley Cyrus or Nelly Furtado. She doesn't have a unique singing voice like Bjork, David Bowie, Freddie Mercury, Janis Joplin, MJ or Bob Dylan. She's no instrument prodigy either. And swifties say that 'Michael couldn't play any instruments'. Well, he was an exceptional beatboxer. She can strum 4 guitar chords and play basic piano, that's it. She doesn't have an outstanding dancing and/or vocal skill.
What is she gonna be remembered for? Her numerous relationships with famous men? While that might be misogynistic or sexist to some degree, she's the one who makes her relationships the centre of her music and public persona and brings them up even 10 years after they ended. Her public feuds with men and women that she can't get over years after? This woman is certainly can hold a grudge and is extremely vindictive. The leader of a parasocial cult that blindly defends her bigotry? I believe so. I don't think I've ever seen a fandom as toxic and as hive-minded as swifties. And again, it's Taylor's own creation. She's the one that constantly says 'look closely for the easter eggs' in her content making her fans theorize on every aspect of her life, or 'if you're very loyal I might invite you to MY HOUSE and you can listen to the new album early, we'll take pics and I'll bake you some cookies'. Of course they'll follow your any order. I'm glad I escaped.
Oof, I'll stop here. That's a very long one already
sorry hehe
.
121 notes · View notes
jewishbarbies · 3 months
Note
oh my god the goth punk billionaire looks ridiculous
https://www.tumblr.com/shitswiftiessay/741442902182477824/this-dress-is-an-abomination-what-the-actual
Tumblr media Tumblr media
it is just me or does it look ill fitted?
but also pairing it with the long black gloves and the necklace and then doing nothing with her hair ruins the whole aesthetic you can tell she was going for. the hairstyle she did go with makes it look like she’s got hair extensions. overall it just looks like she was running late and wrapped herself in a sheet with a hair clip to hike it up the side and make it look like she meant to wear it.
26 notes · View notes
shitswiftiessay · 4 months
Text
taylor swift can’t handle having a single JOKE told about her
Tumblr media
the self-proclaimed goth punk billionaire appeared tight lipped and angry after the golden globes host joked about taylor being shown too much at the nfl games (which is not even a joke, it’s fucking true)
it appears that the stick-up-the-ass billionaire, who is known for siccing her racist fans to harass the ginny and georgia actress over a joke, believes that she is above criticism and mockery.
which is crazy because, given the fact that she went on record to call her reputation album “goth punk,” and is literally burning up the planet to see her boyfriend in this obnoxious overly publicised relationship, you’d think she’s appreciate that the joke the host chose to make was pretty fucking benign. he could have (and SHOULD have) called her out for much worse.
like the fact that she’s been hanging out with a sexual abuse apologist and giving positive pr to a sex offender (who just got off scot free for his crimes) without a fucking care in the world.
I would love to see the LOOK on Taylor’s face if someone was brave enough to publicly call her out for that.
274 notes · View notes
jalwyn21 · 3 months
Note
Look what she made me do indeed because why am I sat, here, on the side of a wealthy, white, british, blonde-haired-blue-eyed man. HOW??
Well, being sick of the goth punk rock ethical music industry Grammy billionaire slay queen person of the year is gonna be the great uniter that brings everyone together. 🤭
Joke aside, it's hard to look away when you see something so horribly unfair. Joe has been nothing but kind and classy the past 7 years.
The attempts at character assassination, the way she weaponizes her fandom and the power imbalance between them is enough to make anyone feel disgusted. Like, you don't even have to be a Joe fan, just a human with empathy..
Tumblr media
35 notes · View notes
heystephen · 5 months
Note
did you see taylor called reputation a "goth punk moment"
LMAO
girlie as a pop artist and a billionaire (and largely a white feminist) is no where near being punk. the whole thing is so ironic and unserious.
what are your thoughts? i love your opinions on things.
to be fair she also sat down and said reputation is about game of thrones a few years ago so i think when it comes to taylors descriptions of reputation it’s best to just smile and nod
28 notes · View notes
fancylala4 · 11 days
Note
would should play taygreedy in a biopic in the future abt the goth punk billionaire?
It should be a mid basic actress who can’t carry a tune. That’s would be the most accurate portrayal of Taylor swift as a person.
I would say that it would be years before we get a biopic but knowing Taylor we are probably going to get one in 2027.
9 notes · View notes
the-witchhunter · 10 months
Text
Punk Danny
I just got to say there are so many things in canon that would totally make sense if they pushed Danny to punk ideology. Just look at some of his biggest enemies
-Evil billionaire that uses his wealth and resources to actively try and hurt Danny and his family
-Fascist ghost cops trying to jail him for possession of illegal goods without trial and then harassing him and framing him
-A government agency that disregards any harm it does to the community in pursuit of its goals, to the point of passing a law making his existence illegal
-Prince Aragon, stuck in his traditional values because they benefit him at the detriment of everyone else
-a king
Are you telling me with enemies like that, it wouldn’t make sense for Danny to fundamentally oppose what they stand for? To oppose hierarchy? Are you telling me his encounter with the ghostly prison industrial complex wouldn’t have left him disillusioned with the “protect and serve” and that he would come out of that not believing ACAB? Are you telling me that seeing Vlad abuse his absurd wealth to do horrible things without consequences wouldn’t have Danny shouting to eat the rich?
Add in the fact his best friend is an activist and goth, and that he routinely fails to adhere to social expectations of him
How the hell would he not be an Anarchist punk? Narratively it makes sense. Thematically it would make even more sense with his villains
Danny should be punk
585 notes · View notes
alwynslove · 13 hours
Note
also isnt the whole point of re recordings to be a copy? leaving the point of her voice aside, how tf do they expect reputation to be rock 😭😭😭😭 wasnt it goth punk shit as ms taylor said??
i thought she was altering it a bit. tf is she just copying it?
her dumb fans want it so she does every genre.
idk what genres she has done outside from
country pop, cringe pop, revenge pop, depressed pop, sad pop, indie pop, bubble gum pop
idk if they even know how hard is is to sing rock? they want her to go full hard rock all that shit.
swifties need to keep their expections low. their self inserted wattpad character doesn't have the range.
Yeah re recordings are supposed to be exact copies of her old albums. She is recreating the same stuff. That’s fine with me. I firmly believe that as an artist she has every right to own her work. But marketing them as brand new albums ticks me off a bit. And then she puts out five editions of the same album with just one different song in each. There’s a reason she became a billionaire you know?
And yeah she 100% doesn’t have the range for rock. If she does that, it would be the worst thing to grace our ears. And swifties would still treat it as the second coming of Christ or something.
6 notes · View notes