Hey! About that ENFP and INFP being different thing someone sent, I have some thoughts on that.
I'm graduated now, but when I was still in school there were two girls who were best friends from day one, let's call them B (ENFP) and S (INFP).
They were pretty different indeed, B was very social and loud, and I mean LOUD, she seemed to love being the class clown, very touchy and funny, she was so energetic it was hard to keep up sometimes, she laughed at everything, sometimes she'd be doing nothing and started to laugh at nothing apparent "I wrote a J that looks like a dog having a stroke" would be the reason (real example btw), she said the most random shit at the most random moments and everyone would laugh, never fought with anyone, if she was mad she'd just put on a frown and be quiet, everyone loved her.
S was noticeably more quiet, her voice was soft and low most times, - except when she was excitedly talking about something, which wasn't so rare if you actually made her feel listened (I know that because I was in love with her for a while, oh well, I promise I'm not biased), she must be some kind of life enthusiast - kind, very easily distracted too, was always reading, drawing, humming or talking, she was friends with everyone, even the teachers and school employees, magnetic almost, she was a great listener and advisor, she was very honest, but not in a rude way, it was more passive aggressive? I guess, when she decided not to like someone, she didn't mistreat the person but the difference in her face and behaviour was visible. And now this is very stereotypical but if she was listening to someone's vent and the person started crying, she'd usually start crying as well, I thought that was cute 💀
Now when they were together it was a whole new thing, they seemed to enter a private world, they had their own language that they made up, like legit a whole damn language, always laughing at everything the other said, always glued to each other, they arrived together and left together, pictures together on Instagram, they walked hand in hand and laid their heads onto each others' shoulders, hugs and kisses, very affectionate, their friendship was the nightmare of every teacher, even if they kept them physically apart, they'd be giggling at something only they seemed to understand, S once went to the principal's office because the teacher was being extremely rude about B's eating habits, apparently, and S started a discussion with the teacher, it was the literal first class of the day, it was intense, I'd never seen her so mad at someone, and I had seen her proper mad times before, oddly enough, i know INFPs have this reputation for being really nice and stuff, but S could get incredibly outraged sometimes in very specific situations, again, she never raised her voice, but everyone shut up in these moments, she didn't have to, but they had very much main characters energy, it just wasn't the same thing when they weren't there or if it was only one of them without the other, not that it was bad, but it was always better if there were the two of them.
They were quite different but also so alike in many ways.
Extra: We graduated 3 years ago, they're still best friends but have been dating for a year and a half now. I don't know how are INFPs and ENFPs ranked as a match, but they seem to work out pretty well, I don't know
- ENFJ.
stop anon my can’t take such a description of friendship that seems to touch the stars you can’t do this to me. nvm, it doesn’t even seem to, it actually does. the world is spinning.
anyways, i hope your love for infp left peacefully and felt beautiful despite
So, og enfp infp asker, here you go
25 notes
·
View notes
Hi! I am an ardent fan of your writing, and I hope to be as sorted and planned as you some day in my own writing journey.
My question is: you have a keen eye when it comes to planning character personality, dynamics, and such. I've also been wading through your ask replies, and your insights into how you write people and how you make them play off of each other is so wonderful to read. If it's not too personal a q, how did you learn how to write like this? Did you go to school for writing, does it come from years of observing people, do you have reading list recs for "how to write real people and real interactions"?
Thanks! This is a really flattering question. I'll try to answer it honestly, because I wish someone had been brutally honest about this with me when I was a young writer.
I didn't go to school for writing. I started doing it when I was about nine years old. It sucked very badly. I kept writing throughout high school, and it still mostly sucked, but some of it was occasionally interesting. ("Interesting" here does not mean "good," by the way.) I took a break in college, and then came back. I've been writing ever since. Sometimes, I feel good about it. A lot of the time, I don't!
I hate giving this advice, because I remember how it feels to get it, and it's the most uninspiring, boring-ass, dog shit advice you can get, but it's also the only advice that is 100% unequivocally true: you have to write, and specifically, you have to write things that suck.
I do not mean that you should make things that suck on purpose. I mean that you have to sit down and try your absolute hardest to make something good. You have to put in the hours, the elbow grease, the blood, sweat, and tears, and then you have to read it over and accept that it just totally sucks. There is no way around this, and you should be wary of people who tell you there is. There is no trick, no rule, no book you can buy or article you can read, that will make your writing not suck. The best someone else can do is tell you what good writing looks like, and chances are, you knew that anyway — after all, you love to read. You wouldn't be trying to do this if you didn't. And anyone who says they can teach you to write so good it doesn't suck at first is either lying to you, or they have forgotten how they learned to write in the first place.
So the trick is to sit there in the miserable doldrums of Suck, write a ton, and learn to like it. Because this is the phase of your path as an artist when you find what it is you love about writing, and it cannot be the chance to make "good writing." This will be the thing that bears you through and compels you to keep going when your writing is shit, i.e., the very thing that makes you a writer in the first place. So find that, and you've got a good start.
Some people know this, but assume that perseverance as a writer is about trying to get to the point where you don't suck anymore. This is not true, and it is an actively dangerous lie to tell young writers. You are not aiming to feel like your writing doesn't suck. You are aiming to write. You are aiming to have written. Everything else is dust and rust. And of course, you'll find things you like about your pieces, you'll find things you're proud of, you'll learn to love the things you've made. But that little itch of self-criticism, in the back of your brain — the one that cringes when you read a clunky line, or thinks of a better character beat right after it's far too late to change — that's never going away. That's the Writer part of you. Read Kafka, read Dickens, read Tolstoy, you will find diary entries where they lament how absolutely fucking atrocious their writing was, and how angry they are that they can't do better. A good writer hates their sentences because they can always imagine better ones. And the ability to imagine a better sentence is what's going to make you pick up the pen again tomorrow. And the day after that. And the day after that.
Which is what I mean, and probably what all those other annoying, preachy advice-givers mean, when we say: a good writer is just someone who writes every day. It's that easy, and that hard.
72 notes
·
View notes
Am I the only one who thinks Donnie would actually WANT to attach to the technodrome again?
My dad convinced me of this after our watch of the movie together, my resident Donatello and technology expert, so here goes.
Obviously, I don’t think Donnie enjoyed being RIPPED from the technodrome, and the connection process isn’t the cleanest thing, but those are the only two downsides really.
Think of what you gain. Complete control of a massive spaceship with all its crazy technology. Control at a thought, not the press of a button or flip of the wrist, a thought. All you have to do is think something and the ship will MAKE IT HAPPEN!! Do you have any idea how impressive that technology is? How incredible that feeling would be? This is the PINNACLE of technology, a once in a lifetime experience that Donnie may spend his entire life trying to recreate. I’m sure Donnie would love to do it again.
It’s like- everything he’s ever wanted.
Ripping him out might’ve been the only way to get him out.
40 notes
·
View notes