Tumgik
#“Just like nazism”
smhalltheurlsaretaken · 3 months
Text
y'all need to get a grip. you blab all day about how much you hate bigots and hateful people and how evil it is to dehumanize anyone and then you turn around and say "kys" and "i think [x] should all just kill themselves" and other disgusting, violent and childish trash
so many people on here are just full of hatred and vitriol and turn into frenzied sharks anytime the target 'deserves it' and they think they can get away with it and not be called bad people. then they whine about how sad it is that we can't all just get along and if only all the evil people in the world would stop doing evil things wouldn't that be nicer
you're just as vicious, hypocritical and fanatically puritanical as the caricature you have made in your minds of the people you think you have nothing in common with. if you've ever told someone, ANYONE to kill themselves you're not advocates of justice, you're not artisans of peace, and you certainly don't have any moral high ground that would allow you to pass judgment on others
418 notes · View notes
neechees · 1 year
Text
Speaking of racist authors who's scalp I want decorating my home, but Rowling literally keeps pulling that thing where she backtracks the alleged meaning & intentions of her own work by saying "well actually I meant THIS the whole time" in the books to try make it look more politically "savvy" (in her mind) or steeped with meaning than it actually is, because she is literally too stupid and short sighted to actually write those things, & usually its also to try get out of some sort of criticism, & she's done this at least 3 times.
Like first was the whole "Gandalf is gay" shtick when this was her shallow, lazy attempt at trying to look "diverse". Second time was when she was like "well actually Hermione wasn't WHITE, I think she was Black" which, absolutely wasn't true considering she describes all her Black characters as being "tall" and athletic (which, Hermione is not) and she would've given her a stupid, obviously racist name if she always intended this.
But the most recent time was her allegeding that she based the death eaters off of trans activists? This obviously isn't true since she's already repeatedly talked about the specifically nazi & fash influence on the death eaters, and then when people critisized her for her antisemitism & lack of logic on how the death eaters operate, she attempted to "prove" this wrong by tweeting about visiting the auschwitz memorial museum (in relation to, again, it's specific influence on death deaters) to try insist she was sensitive to what she was referencing. If she intended this from the beginning, she would've brought attention to it because she literally just so stupid & knows it but tries to "prove" otherwise. So the whole thing example NOW is just her appealing to her fash t/erf clown crew to try seem more intelligent than she is.
98 notes · View notes
canichangemyblogname · 4 months
Text
Fuck. We are in desperate need of genocide studies in the US. Because people are genuinely arguing that Nazism— and thus the white supremacy which inspired it— is an aberration of European philosophical tradition, rather than the end conclusion of “Western” ideologies.
“Nazism is uniquely evil” implies it cannot happen here and that it originally happened by freak happenstance. If you singularize the actions of the Nazis, you lose critical analysis of what ideas inspired them (see: US genocide of First Nations People) and how the Germans developed their tactics of oppression and murder (see: German genocide of the Herero and the Nama people between 1904-1908).
I believe it’s time we call this kind of rhetoric what it is: genocide denialism and Holocaust revisionism. It denies the European-created genocides before and after the Holocaust, and it rewrites the history leading up to the Holocaust to purposefully cover up the fact that it can and will happen here. Over and over and over. Such rhetoric also (purposefully) denies victims of genocides the world over solidarity with each other. To justify the destruction of Poland, Hitler asked, “Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?” Would you deny the son of a Shoah survivor the right to march with Armenians? Or would you, like the German state, accuse him of de-singularizing and relativizing the Holocaust and report him to the local antisemitism commissioner?
If you treat Nazism as unlike anything else that’s ever happened or will happen, then you don’t need to worry about it and the tragedies it created happening ever again. “Never again” becomes an empty promise. This type of rhetoric gives people the opportunity to wipe their hands of any culpability in the rise and reproduction of similar systems or other genocides, and they can use this singularity rhetoric to position themselves into a moral category despite supporting similar ideas. That Nazism and the Shoah happened means it was possible and still is possible, among any people.
The “massive, systematic, and efficient nature of” Nazi oppression, brutality, atrocity and its genocidal tactics and policies is a function of modernity and “Western” Enlightenment rationality. It is not an aberration.
34 notes · View notes
souredfigs · 5 months
Text
Israel is an illegal state which has no right to exist and every european white settler living in the terrorist state of Israel is fully and wholly aware of the fact that they are in a land which they stole from carrying out the genocide of Palestinians who have been living there for as far back as 11000 years on the basis of a fake ridiculous piece of writing . It's very simple to understand .
19 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Me when I don’t know anything about radical feminism
70 notes · View notes
insurged · 3 months
Note
isn't wesker a naz*?
no, he's not. if you know anything about resident evil as a series, you will know that this is not the case. just because wesker hates people in general does not mean his ideals equals racial supremacy. i don't even understand where this misunderstanding comes from but do your research, pls and thanks.
7 notes · View notes
bastard-sweet · 5 months
Text
The point of A Christmas Carol was not to teach morals by example; it was to teach morals directly. Ebenezer Scrooge was specifically made to be a reader insert. The lessons of A Xmas Carol can mostly be divided into 'you don't want to be this guy (he's suffering)' and 'you don't want to be this guy (he's evil, like ultimately, Biblically, very un-Xtian)', afforded by the third category of Basically Everything In The Book 'you don't want to be this guy anymore (he's deeply relatable to the upper-class Victorians the book is targeted at)'. The fact that he doesn't spend money on himself is not a sign that he needs to care for himself more; it's to show that he's so greedy to the point that it is useless, to show that valuing money this much is bad and senseless. The fact that he were to die if he didn't change for the better is an example of Cosmic punishment. Maybe the story does have a hint of teaching Scrooge to take care of himself, but that's only for the same reason that Scrooge is given a 'workaholic billionaire' backstory. The rich like(d) to see themselves as hard-working, and were the target audience, and Dickens didn't want to insult his target audience while trying to teach them basic human decency. So he also took the opportunity to slot that into the 'you don't want to be this guy (he's suffering)' method of teaching.
#that post just frustrates me so i decided to write out my thoughts#ebenezer scrooge is a reader insert!!#a christmas carol#also charles dickens' mindset at the time of writing is fascinating to think about. a xmas carol was written in response to a government#report on the conditions of mines factories and mills for child labourers (which before writing charles dickens also conducted his own#investigation i think). dickens vowed he would deliver a 'sledge-hammer's blow on behalf of the Poor Man's child'#and xmas carol is... not that. from a 2023 perspective it feels really toothless actually. it's about a guy who learns about the magic of#xmas and being nice to poor people. but thats because it's not MEANT to be a sledge-hammer's blow clearly. he reconsidered#and wrote a persuasive letter and it's actually really interesting to pick apart! so there's my recommendation#and regarding accusations of antisemitism: dickens probably was really i havent really read many of his works outside of school so.#but the book is pretty (n yes pretty is doing a lot of legwork here) divorced from that. its antisemitic but thats mostly#because it uses classical Xtian models of morality (eg celebrating xmas) to equate not celebrating xmas to cruelty to show how bad cruelty#is. not to equate cruelty to non-xtianity to show how bad non-xtianity is. yes theres some fucked use of carciature but the antisemitism#i read as very casual? like nowadays. its hooked nose = evil. antisemitism was absolutely not the intent at all its just very much an#artifact of its time. which. i dont think anyones learning nazism from ACC. its not challenging antisemitism but. most books dont even now#sweet talkin'#long tags#sweet whisperin'#charles dickens#classism
8 notes · View notes
arcann · 11 months
Text
Instead of saying that staff has a potterhead, we should remember the person that pointed that out by showing screenshots of the staff member's blog had their own blog deleted just hours after that post started making rounds and staff told them they couldn't complain or ever recover it.
18 notes · View notes
philsmeatylegss · 1 month
Text
The hardest lesson you will learn if you are interested in learning about Nazi Germany: so may people posting content about it are actual Nazis
No seriously if anyone is starting to get into WWII/Third Reich history, it is so easy to be indoctrinated because the main message a lot of Nazis spit now is that Hitler was bad and the SS were bad, but everyone else was chill.
And it’s hard to realize the narrative they’re spitting is wrong unless you know a lot going into it.
I have been watching a dude called “TIKhistory” the last few days on youtube and something felt off about his takes, but a lot of them had at least some plausible deniability and enough factual information that I thought it was still worthwhile.
I just start watching another video from this dude with the title “The REAL Reason why Hitler HAD to start WW2” which is an insane title and caught my attention. And then my answer was given by the first five mins of his video when I realized this dude was, at the least, a wehraboo, and at most, an actual Nazi.
Pretty much any non-Nazi historian agrees that Hitler started WWII because 1) he wanted to conquer Europe 2) he wanted “Lebensraum,” aka living space for “Aryans.” Where German people, with no Jewish or Roma people present, can have ample space to live.
You know why most non-Nazi historians agree on this? Because Hitler fucking said this. In his literal book. That everyone read.
WWII was declared by the Allies when Germany invaded Poland for LeBeNsRaUm. Yes, Germany never wanted to fight Britain. You know why? 1) they were white enough 2) a fucking ocean kept them apart. They wanted all of Europe + Soviet Union. That is why WWII started.
See how quick it was to get to that point? Fucking TIKhistory’s video is forty five minutes long. That’ll happen when your point is horeshit and also not true.
Hitler started WWII. All of the generals and higher ups at least knew of the Holocaust and most perpetrated their own massacres for shits and giggles. The Nazi army wasn’t really that great, they just knew how to play the cards in the circumstances they were in (they used horses a fuck ton. You don’t see it because a lot of documentaries use footage from Nazi propaganda in which they weren’t recorded). These are all basic facts for non-Nazis. So warning that if anyone you meet challenges those three facts, they probably are a Nazi
4 notes · View notes
daminini · 7 months
Text
All of this boils down to racism and it’s so fucking disheartening to see
9 notes · View notes
adelle-ein · 5 months
Text
getting pretty tired of those posts about how being antisemitic helps zionism or is what bibi wants or lets evangelicals off the hook or whatever so that’s why you shouldn’t be antisemitic 
maybe you should just idk not want to be antisemitic
9 notes · View notes
neechees · 1 year
Text
Another detail about the Harga that a few people mentioned is that there's this "rune" that keeps popping up in the film with the Harga, & it's actually a nonsense rune that nazis made up during WW2, & this rune has no historical evidence or attestations of having ever existed in either younger or elder futhark despite claims from nazis that it was "ancient". This nonsense rune was a redesign of the "O" rune (which is the REAL version & had no racist connotations originally), which is written like this ᛟ . But the changed Nazi rune adds "feet" to the ends, which is used by the Harga, & they arrange their eating tables this way. You also see this rune on the "love potion" mural here.
So the Harga claim they're just practicing their cultural practices, which is allegedly "ancient" but use a fake rune that has no historical basis pre-second world war, & was made up by Germans, not even vikings or historical Scandanavians themselves. Not only this, but they perform blood eagles & attestupa (senicide), both of which historicans today believe most likely did not actually exist. So this just shows that the Harga use "culture" to justify their white supremacy, but the cultural practices they do have no cultural or historical basis in reality, which proves they aren't actually concerned with either culture OR historical accuracy.
Just like their counterparts in real life.
39 notes · View notes
chaiaurchaandni · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
yk these pages r getting funded by israel if they unabashedly post bullshit like this. the zionists hated palestinians so much, they started saying hitler wasnt that bad like wtf
8 notes · View notes
redjaybathood · 1 year
Text
Why Belarusians speak Russian
youtube
Video has subtitles, you can use auto-translate to English.
I'm not even from Belarus, the Belarus government currently helps Russia to invade my country, and a good chunk of people there... they're not all Belarusian partisans, so to speak. But this makes me feel rage.
26 notes · View notes
hydnes · 8 months
Text
harry potter fans are insane because they really do view it as like, "just let people enjoy things..." like. hello there friend (<- patronizing) did you know that "no ethical consumption under capitalism" was actually about nestle's monopolies and coca-cola and people being forced to buy things from temu/aliexpress/wish due to boots theory and it was not, in fact, about you funneling money into making nazi death camps for trans women
8 notes · View notes
thedevilsrain · 10 months
Text
i actually wish, like, i'd really like to write something about why there's so much nazism present not just in FEWL, but yasuko aoike's body of work as a whole, even if a lot of it remains untranslated. explain it somehow
because like for as silly as the woman's creations are (literally gag BL manga with characters based on 1970s musicians), the existence of not just nazism but all of the politics, especially in FEWL, really do say something about like... postwar japan, the presentation of nazism in 60s and 70s, how nazis are portrayed in media as a whole, us imperialism, and probably so many other things
like, aoike didn't just randomly decide that her main character's father would be a nazi tank commander for no reason, this isn't just a "oh it was the 1970s" thing, there's intricate historical and cultural reasons this sort of thing happens, and as easy as chalking it up to that is, it undermines the fact this type of stuff can even happen today
12 notes · View notes