Neuroessentialism and mental health
Hi!
Time for a little rant about neuroessentialism.
The aim of this post is to provide the opportunity to be conscious of the things that influence us when it comes the way we think about mental health and to challenge stigma around mental health.
First off, I’m not a doctor and the information here cannot serve as medical advice. Always consult your doctor before changing your medication or treatment approach.
Secondly, a lot of the information I present here is elaborated on and further discussed in an episode of the Psychiatry and psychotherapy podcast called “Free will in psychotherapy and psychiatry Part 3” and while I will link to as many things as I can, you can also find a lot of the source material on the website for the podcast. https://www.psychiatrypodcast.com/psychiatry-psychotherapy-podcast/2020/7/22/free-will-in-psychiatry-amp-psychotherapy-part-3
So, I see a lot of people talking about mental health on here through a neuroessentialist perspective in memes or text format and I don’t think they’re aware of it so. I’d like to talk a bit about it.
First, I’ll offer a definition of neuroessentialism:
" Neuroessentialism is the view that the definitive way to explain human psychological experience is by reference to the brain and its activity from chemical, biological and neuroscientific perspectives. For instance, if someone is experiencing depression a neuroessentialistic perspective would claim that he or she is experiencing depression because his or her brain is functioning in a certain way.” - Schultz, W. (2018)
I see people talk about, for example, depression in this way often: in memes when people say "I have a literal neurotransmitter deficiency, Karen." or " God forgot to add serotonin when he made me".
Now, why can this be problematic?
Before I get into the issues with this perspective, I will first acknowledge that one of the reasons this view has become so prominent lately is because it aims to reduce stigma around mental health issues.
In the podcast episode mentioned above they point out that “Efforts to reduce stigma should be praised, but they should also be critically analyzed to determine if they meet their goal.”
And that’s the thing neuroessentialism, while aiming to reduce stigma and shame it only does so short term and ends up contributing to stigmatizing attitudes about mental health.
I want to say that it's great to see people fight back when it comes to stigma around mental health. That's what I see people do in these memes. But the effects of neuroessentialist perspectives end up othering people; making them inherently “bad”, “defect” or “helpless”.
Here the deterministic aspect of neuroessentialism comes up - it tells us that there’s something wrong with our brain that we can’t change. It alienates people because it chips away at their and our belief in their ability to change. If you believe that someone's mental issues are rooted exclusively in brain biology, you're less likely to believe that they can control their behavior and so it is less worth the effort of getting them better. This brings about more stigma.
Another thing that’s important to talk about is how neuroessentialism is an extremely simplistic perspective on mental health. And that’s also one of the reasons it has become so big- because it offers a simple explanation to very complicated illnesses.
Here, I want to add a quote by Psychiatrist and psychotherapist Dr. David Puder:
“There are prominent theories out there that we know just aren’t true anymore and that get propagated because they are simplistic ways of explaining things; for example, depression is because you have low serotonin in your brain. That’s just not true. It’s a whole lot more complicated than that.
You could probably show 20 or 30 things that are going on in the brain during depression. Inflammation. Like initially I thought ‘oh depression is inflammation!’
Well, it turns out not all depression has inflammation. Maybe, only one third [of patients with depression] have inflammation markers in the brain.”
We have been looking to neuroscience for an explanation when it comes to mental health and been satisfied with the idea of a simple "chemical imbalance" but truth is that there are many more neurotransmitters which significantly affect our brains when we talk about depression – it’s so far from just serotonin.
Another example of how neuroessentialim can oversimplify mental health is with brain scans. So, in the podcast episode mentioned above, Dr. Puder talks about how he was really interested in emotions and especially studying anger and he was looking at all this research on the different areas in the brain involved in anger. After a while, he says, he began to understand that it’s really complex and you can’t just point at one area and say that’s the area that’s involved in the emotion anger. There are several areas involved in just that one emotion and different studies show different things.
The truth is that the manifestation of mental illness in the body is a very new area of research and we haven’t found physical manifestations for most mental illnesses and the important thing to note here is that despite this we still do have ways of treating all of them.
Alright, all this can seem quite removed from us so how does neuroessentialsim affect us?
In the episode the guest star, Mathew Hagele, further discusses the article which provided the definition on neuroessentialism above: “Shultz looked at studies investigating how patients viewed their own prognosis and later the same with professionals.
The study found that biochemical or genetic attribution scores were a significant predictor of longer expected symptoms duration and lower perceived odds of recovery.” (Lebowitz et al., 2013, p. 523).
Now, this means that the more a patient attributes symptoms of their psychopathology to genetic (inherited disorderes) or biochemical (serotonin deficiency for example) factors, the longer they expected to struggle with their disorder and the smaller the belief that they can recover.
If a person doesn’t believe they can be helped or get better they’re a lot less likely to try and a lot more likely to feel scared and hopeless.
The other side of this coin is the effect the neuroessentialist narrative has on clinicians which Matthew Haegel dives into in the next part of the quote:
“Another study shows that clinicians believe psychotherapy to be less effective when shown biological descriptions of mental health pathologies...
They took a couple different disorders that these clinicians were looking at and one group had a biological explanation and the other did not- had a different type of explanation. And [in] the results that were across disorders, the biological explanation yielded significantly less empathy than the psychosocial explanation. They also did some additional analysis and they found that biological explanations yielded less empathy than the psychosocial explanations among both MD’s and non-MD’s…..”( Lebowitz, M. S., & Ahn, W. K. (2014). )
So, in these studies we see that a neuroessentialist perspective lowers empathy for the patient in medical health professionals and people who weren’t medical health professionals.
Okay, so how does this perception of the patient’s illness affect the patient’s treatment?
I’ll start with a quote where Hagele elaborates further:
“…and finally, that clinicians perceive psychotherapy to be significantly less effective when symptoms were explained biologically than psychologically…[ Lebowitz, M. S., & Ahn, W. K. (2014). ]
basically, linking the idea that the diminished importance of psychotherapy among mental health professionals ascribing to the concept of neuroessentialism is doubly harmful when considering the multiple contexts in which psychotherapy matches or outperforms pharmaceutical interventions.”
What Hagele points out here is the way neuroessentialism can lead to a less effective and ethical treatment of mental illness. It makes us approach an issue in one manner only- fix the brain, fix the behavior. But sometimes what can treat he issue in the brain is, working on the behavior. This can be talked about in terms of meds vs. psychotherapy.
So, seeing mental health from a neuroessentialist perspective, completely excludes the effects of psychotherapy. A classic example is CBT (cognitive behavioral therapy) in which we have “Cognitive restructuring”: a psychotherapeutic process in which a person learns to recognize maladaptive or distressing thoughts and teaches their brain to consider other perspectives or different thought pattern. This is an example of “work on behaviour to better brain” rather than “working on brain will fix behavior”. According to strict neuroessentialism therapy shouldn’t work as well as it does but there is a really big body of science backing psychotherapeutic intervention and its efficacy compared to psychopharmacological intervention.
I feel I should address the discussion of Meds vs. therapy before I continue, (it is a whole topic worthy of a post on its own) but to be brief, they work best together and if you’re weighing one against the other psychotherapy has more long-term effects and barely any side effects compared to medication. There are other factor affecting what would be the most effective treatment approach that further nuances this discussion.
Now this is all a pretty big picture but how is this seen every day?
Well, its seen in the downplaying of the importance of therapy. Often, I see this as people normalize behavior where they kind of devalue the importance therapy or put off working on their issues in therapy with the excuse that it’s only for “crazy” people or not something worth the effort.
Therapy then increasingly is seen as this unimportant, extra thing rather than, in most cases, the most effective and safe treatment. And the less crucial therapy is considered, the less accessible it’s going to be – in the U.S. it can often be easier to get your insurance company to cover for a doctors visits where the treatment would be for your GP to prescribe you an antidepressant than an inpatient or outpatient treatment with a mental health professional.
Another point I wanna put out there is that that neuroessentialist narrative is incentivized by pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Puder talks about his own experience in the podcast episode and makes sure to stress that practitioners are humans too and will of course be biased towards something if that something writes them a check or pays some of their expenses. In the episode they discuss a way in which we have seen the neuroessentialist narrative progress:
“Second, there is evidence that the significant increase in direct-to consumer (DTC) advertising for antidepressants is related to rising prescription rates (Park & Grow, 2008). Such advertisements portray depression as a biological medical condition that can successfully be treated with medicine (Lacasse & Leo, 2005; Leo & Lacasse, 2008)” (613).
Now, medicine is an important tool in psychiatry and there is a lot of unnecessary stigma around medication for mental health conditions. I am under no circumstances arguing that medication is bad and therapy is the only right way to treat mental illness. That would be an extreme simplification and invalidation of human experiences. I also wanna acknowledge that being able to go to therapy in many places in the world is a matter of privilege. Therapy simply isn’t accessible for everyone and people can choose an “only medication approach” for many valid reasons. And if that’s the only treatment that was accessible to you I’m really proud of you for taking care of yourself and doing what you can.
If your doctor has prescribed you a medication please take it and know that the purpose is to help you and that you are worthy of help and good health care. The situation where I would suggest to be a tad critical is when people come in with disorders and issues that they have dealt with for years and most of their life and they are just prescribed an antidepressant and sent home. That simply isn’t effective and ethical care. In that case it is worth investigating getting access to a mental health practitioner as well as continuing with medicinal treatment.
I could talk about this for hours but the last thing I wanna get across is that this is a societal problem. I don’t suggest we turn away from pharmaceutical intervention which saves thousands of lives and helps people get better, rather that we work to make psychotherapy (which can be and is crucial for long term remission and recovery) more accessible for when it’s appropriate.
When your doctor tells you that this invisible illness is because of your biology most people feel validated and experience less shame. The fact that people feel like they need to have a tracible biological “anomaly” in their brains to be worthy of treatment and care speaks to an invalidation that many feel. But the issue here is that we're taught to invalidate invisible illness in society which in the end makes people delay critical treatment or blocks access to ethical and effective care.
We also have to acknowledge that with the technology we have now we are not able to know whether all mental illness manifests in the brain in a way we can see so hinging our worthiness of help and care on the definition is in the end harmful.
TL;DR
" Neuroessentialism is the view that the definitive way to explain human psychological experience is by reference to the brain and its activity from chemical, biological and neuroscientific perspectives. For instance, if someone is experiencing depression a neuroessentialistic perspective would claim that he or she is experiencing depression because his or her brain is functioning in a certain way.” - Schultz, W. (2018)
Neuroessentilism can validate a patient and bring relief of shame short term but ends up contributing to stigmatizing attitudes and thus doesn’t help reduce stigma overall.
The neuroessentialist narrative can downplay the efficacy and criticalness of psychotherapeutic intervention
Neuroessentialist perspectives foster lower empathy levels for patients in medical providers and non-providers alike.
Neuroessentialist perspectives of a patient significantly increases levels of prognostic pessimism which leads to worse treatment outcomes
Neuroessentialism arose because of a real invalidation people feel around their mental health and it is a societal issue we need to work on
We can combat neuroessentialism and stigma by working to make psychotherapy more accessible and talking about our experiences openly as well as giving each other kindness and empathy.
13 notes
·
View notes
Citations On Tap!
For those asking for forensic anth & forensic arch references for assessing skeletal remains as transgender, by traditional methods and using new techniques. Under cut because LOOOONG. This is the list I used for a two-term thesis. The reference lists in these pubs can provide many more suggestions. While most of these are unfortunately behind academic access walls, there should be plenty of abstracts to read that are public.
ETA: Ha! All the qual research and interviewing refs are still in there too. Well, if they’re useful, have at it.
Assessing Transgender Skeletal Remains
1. Agarwal, S. (2012). The past of sex, gender and health: archaeology of the aging skeleton. American Anthropologist, 144(2), 322-335.
2. American Medical Association. (2019, June 10). AMA adopts new policies on first day of voting at 2019 Annual Meeting. [Press Release] https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-adopts-new-policies-first-day-voting-2019-annual-meeting
3. Barrouquere, B. (2019). Under attack. Southern Poverty Law Center Intelligence Report (Spring 2019), 19-24.
4. Berg, G. (2013). Determining the sex of unknown human skeletal remains. In: Tersigni-Tarrant, M. & Shirley, N. (eds). Forensic Anthropology: An Introduction. Boca Raton: CRC Press
5. Bersatos, A., Papageorgopoulou, C., Valakos, E., & Chovalopoulou, M. (2018). Investigating the sex-related geometric variation of the human cranium. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 132(5), 1505-1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1790-z
6. Blair, E. (2015). A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 6(1), 14-29. doi:10.2458/jmm.v6i1.18772.
7. Boyer, Y., Odeyemi, A., Fletcher, E., and Fletcher, J. (2019). Vulnerable Targets: Trans Prisoner Safety, the Law, and Sexual Violence in the Prison System. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 31(2), 386-412. doi: 10.3138/cjwl.31.2.07
8. Bruzek, J. (2002). A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 117(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10012
9. Buchanan, S. (2014). Bone modification in male to female transgender surgeries: Considerations for the forensic anthropologist. (Collection 1290) Master’s thesis, Louisiana State University. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1290
10. Buikstra, J. & Ubelaker, D. (1994). Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Research Series 44, Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.
11. Charmaz, K. (2001). Grounded Theory: Methodology and Theory Construction. In (Eds.): Smelser, N. & Baltes, P. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Pergamon: Oxford, UK. DOI: 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00775-0.
12. Chenail, R. (2012). Conducting qualitative data analysis: Reading line-by-line, but analyzing by meaningful qualitative units. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 266-269. doi: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss1/12.
13. Ching, B. & Xu, J. (2017). The effects of gender neuroessentialism on transprejudice: An experimental study. Sex Roles, 78, 228-241.
14. Corrieri, B., & Márquez-Grant, N. (2015). What do bones tell us? The study of human skeletons from the perspective of forensic anthropology. Science Progress, 98(4), 391-402. https://doi.org/10.3184/003685015X14470674934021
15. Dauvergne, M. (2008). Police-reported Hate Crime in Canada. Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/85-002-X
16. Dechamps-Braly Clinic (2020.) The beginnings of facial feminization & gender confirmation surgery. Retrieved 2021 February 12 from https://deschamps-braly.com/facial-feminization-surgery/
17. DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40, 314-321. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x.
18. Delgado-Ruiz, R., Swanson, P., & Romanos, G. (2019). Systematic review of the long-term effects of transgender hormone therapy on bone markers and bone mineral density and their potential effects in implant therapy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(6), 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060784
19. Dozono, T. (2017). Teaching Alternative and Indigenous Gender Systems in World History: A Queer Approach. The History Teacher, 50(3), 425-447. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44507259
20. Facque, A., Atencio, D., & Schechter, L. (2019). Anatomical basis and surgical techniques employed in facial feminization and masculinization. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 30(5), 1406-1408. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005535
21. Ferembach, D., Schwindezky, I. and Stoukal, M. (1980). Recommendation for age and sex diagnoses of skeletons. Journal of Human Evolution,9, 517-549.
22. Fernández, R., Esteva, I., Gómez-Gil, E., Rumbo, T., Almaraz, M., Roda, E., Haro-Mora, J., Guillamón, A. & Pásaro, E. (2014). The (CA)n polymorphism of ERβ gene is associated with FtM Transsexualism. Journal of Sexual Medicine. https://doi:10.1111/jsm.12398
23. Fighera, T., da Silva, E., Lindenau, J., & Spritzer, P. (2018). Impact of cross-sex hormone therapy on bone mineral density and body composition in trans women. Clinical Endocrinology, 88(6), 856-862. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13607
24. Fighera, T., Ziegelmann, P., Rasia da Silva, T., & Spritzer, P. (2019). Bone mass effects of cross-sex hormone therapy in transgender people: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Endocrine Society, 3(5), 943-964. https://doi.org/10.1210/js.2018-00413
25. Franchi, A., Valette, S., Agier, R., Prost, R., Kéchichan, R., & Fanton, L. (2019). The prospects for application of computational anatomy in forensic anthropology for sex determination. Forensic Science International, 297, 156-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.009
26. Geller, P. L. (2005). Skeletal analysis and theoretical complications. World Archaeology, 37(4), 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240500404391
27. Geller, P. L. (2019). The fallacy of the transgender skeleton. In J. E. Buikstra (Ed.), Bioarchaeologists Speak Out (pp. 231-242). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93012-1_10
28. GLAAD. (2019 December 6.). Glossary of Terms. GLAAD Media Reference Guide. Retrieved 2020 November 18 from https://www.glaad.org/reference/transgender.
29. Gooren, L., Kreukels, B., Lapauw, B., & Giltay, E. (2015). (Patho)physiology of cross-sex hormone administration to transsexual people: The potential impact of male-female genetic differences. Andrologia, 47(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12389
30. Graneheim, U., & Lundman, B. (2003). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105-112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
31. Guillemin, M., & Heggen, K. (2009). Rapport and respect: Negotiating ethical relations between researcher and participant. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 12(3), 291-299. doi:10.1007/s11019-008-9165-8.
32. Haraldsen, I., Haug, E., Falch, J., Egeland, T., & Opjordsmoen, S. (2007). Cross-sex pattern of bone mineral density in early onset gender identity disorder. Hormones and Behavior, 52(3), 334-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.05.012
33. Harris, K. (2018 February 7). Canada's prison system overhauls transgender inmate policy: Offenders can now be placed in prison based on gender identity rather than anatomy. CBC News (News media). Retrieved May 1 2021 from https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/transgender-inmates-csc-policy-1.4512510
34. Hayes, C. (2015 November 21). "New sketch released: Do you recognize this transgender woman?". Orlando Sentinel. Retrieved 2020 September 22 from https://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/breaking-news/os-transgender-woman-composite-sketch-1988-20151121-story.html
35. Heerwegh, D., & Loosveldt, G. (2008). Face-to-Face versus web surveying in a high internet-coverage population differences in response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 836-846.
36. Jacob, S. & Furgerson, S. (2012). Writing interview protocols and conducting interviews: tips for students new to the field of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 17(42).
37. Jaffray, B. (2018). Experiences of violent victimization and unwanted sexual behaviours among gay, lesbian, bisexual and other sexual minority people, and the transgender population, in Canada, 2018. Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2020001/article/00009-eng.htm.
38. Jones, G. (2014). Not a yes or no question: critical perspectives on sex and gender in forensic anthropology. (Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5246). Master’s thesis, University of Windsor. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/5246
39. Jordan, A. (2016). Her mirror, his sword: Unbinding binary gender and sex assumptions in Iron Age British mortuary traditions. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23(3), 870-899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9295-x
40. Kelly, M., Lubitow, A., Town, M. & Mercier, A. (2020) Collective trauma in queer communities. Sexuality & Culture, 1522-1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09710-y
41. Kelsall, D., & Bowes, M. (2016). No standards: Medicolegal investigation of deaths. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 188(3), 169. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.160041
42. Klales, A. R., Ousley, S. D., & Vollner, J. M. (2012). A revised method of sexing the human innominate using Phenice's nonmetric traits and statistical methods. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 149(1), 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22102
43. Kreukels, B., & Guillamon, A. (2016). Neuroimaging studies in people with gender incongruence. International Review of Psychiatry, 28(1), 120-128. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.3109/09540261.2015.1113163
44. Lang, C. & U. Kuhnle (2008). Intersexuality and Alternative Gender Categories in Non-Western Cultures. Hormone Research in Paediatrics 69, 240-250.
45. Lea, A. (2016). Clinical dimensions of a ‘biological concept’: transsexualism and the interplay between etiological theory and clinical therapy. Endeavour, 40(3), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2016.07.007
46. Lee, J., Finlayson, C., Olson-Kennedy, J., Garofalo, R., Chan, Y., Glidden, D., & Rosenthal, S. (2020). Low bone mineral density in early pubertal transgender/gender diverse youth: Findings from the trans youth care study. Journal of the Endocrine Society, 4(9), bvaa065. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa065
47. Leighton, S. (2010). Using a vignette-based questionnaire to explore adolescents’ understanding of mental health issues. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 15(2), 231-250. doi:10.1177/1359104509340234
48. Lovell, N. C. (1989). Test of Phenice's technique for determining sex from the os pubis. American journal of physical anthropology. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330790112
49. Maass, P., & Friedling, L. (2014). Scars of Parturition? Influences Beyond Parity. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 26(1), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.2402
50. Maracat. (2015 November 19). "Julie Doe" - Transgender woman likely murdered in 1988, believed to be cisgender for 27 years". Daily Kos. Retrieved 2020 September 22 from https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/11/19/1451910/--Julie-Doe-Trans-woman-likely-murdered-in-1988-believed-to-be-cis-for-27-years
51. Martin, D., Harrod, R., and Pérez, V. (2013). Bioarchaeology: An integrated approach to working with human remains. Springer Science + Business Media: New York
52. McFadden, C. & Oxenham, M. (2016). Revisiting the Phenice technique sex classification results reported by MacLaughlin and Bruce (1990). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 159. pp 182-183. https://doi:10.1002/ajpa.22839
53. McGrath, C., Palmgren, P., & Liljedahl, M. (2018). Twelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews. Medical Teacher, 41(9), 1002-1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497149
54. Merkel, J. (2017). Access to healthcare and lack thereof for transgender people. Theory in Action, 10(4), 41-47. DOI:10.3798/tia.1937-0237.1724
55. Michael, A., Isa, M., Redgrave, A., & Redgrave, L. (2020 February 19-22). Transgender and Gender Variant Decedents. [Conference presentation]. AAFS 2020 Convention, Anaheim, California, USA. http://transdoetaskforce.org/collaborative-approaches-in-the-identification-of-transgender-and-gender-variant-decedents/
56. Mirandé, A. (2016). Hombres Mujeres: An Indigenous Third Gender. Men and Masculinities, 19(4), p. 385.
57. Midence, K and Hargreaves, I. (2010). Psychosexual adjustment in male-to-female transsexuals: An overview of the research evidence. The Journal of Psychology, 131(6), pp 602-614.
58. National Center for Transgender Equality. (2016 July 9). Frequently asked questions about transgender people. Retrieved 2020 September 22 from https://transequality.org/issues/resources/frequently-asked-questions-about-transgender-people
59. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2020). Sex Assessment. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology (SWGANTH). Retrieved 2020 December 7 from https://www.nist.gov/document/swganthsexassessmentpdf.
60. Ontario Ministry of the Solicitor General. (2020). Death Investigations. Retrieved 2020 December 10 from https://www.mcscs.jus.gov.on.ca/english/DeathInvestigations/DI_intro.html
61. Onwuegbuzie, A., Leech, N. & Collins, K. (2012). Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. The Qualitative Report, 17(28), 1-28.
62. Pearce, R., Erikainen, S. & Vincent, B. (2020). TERF wars: A introduction. The Sociological Review Monographs, 68(4), 677-698. https://doi.10.1177/0038026120934713
63. Plemons, E. (2019). Gender, ethnicity, and transgender embodiment: interrogating classification in facial feminization surgery. Body & Society, 25(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X18812942Rahim, Z. (2017 July 5). “Canadian baby given health card without sex designation”. CNN (news media) Retrieved 2021 February 22 from: https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/04/health/canadian-baby-gender-designation/index.html
64. Rahim, Z. (2017 July 5). Canadian baby given health card without sex designation. CNN (News Media). Retrieved 2021 March 15 from https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/04/health/canadian-baby-gender-designation/index.html
65. Ray, K. (17 December 2018). "Science provides new lead in 30-year-old Florida cold case". WFTV. ABC News Media. Retrieved 2020 September 22 from https://www.wftv.com/news/9-investigates/science-provides-new-lead-in-30-year-old-florida-cold-case/890420987/
66. Redgrave, L. & Redgrave, A. (28 December 2018). "The Incredible Postmortem Journey of "Transgender Julie Doe"". Trans Doe Task Force. Retrieved 2020 November 13 from http://transdoetaskforce.org/the-incredible-postmortem-journey-of-transgender-julie-doe/.
67. Rosen, H., Hamnvik, O.-P., Jaisamrarn, U., Malabanan, A., Safer, J., Tangpricha, V., Wattanachanya, L., & Yeap, S. (2019). Bone densitometry in transgender and gender non-conforming (tgnc) individuals: 2019 iscd official position. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 22(4), 544-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2019.07.004
68. Saldaña, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Research. Sage Publications Ltd.: London, UK.
69. Salgado, C., Al Qattan, H., Nugent, A., Gerth, D., Kassira, W., McGee, C., & Wo, L. (2018). Feminizing the face: Combination of frontal bone reduction and reduction rhinoplasty. Case Reports in Surgery, 2018, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1947807
70. Sbaraini, A., Carter, S., Evans, R. & Blinkhorn, A. (2011). How to do a grounded theory study: a worked example of a study of dental practices. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), s.128. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-128
71. Schall, J., Rogers, T., & Deschamps-Braly, J. (2020). Reprint of: Breaking the binary: The identification of trans-women in forensic anthropology. Forensic Science International, 314, 110356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110356
72. Scheim A. & Bauer, G. (2015). Sex and Gender Diversity Among Transgender Persons in Ontario, Canada: Results From a Respondent-Driven Sampling Survey. The Journal of Sex Research 52(1), 1-14.
73. Schutt, R. (2018). Investigating the Social World. Sage Publications Inc.: Los Angeles, USA.
74. Sharpley, F., Munro, D., & Elly, M. (2005). Silence and rapport during initial interviews. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 149-159. doi:10.1080/09515070500142189.
75. Siberian Times (2015 December 1) Female 'Amazon' warrior buried 2,500 years ago in Altai Mountains was...male. Retrieved 2021 January 19 from https://siberiantimes.com/science/casestudy/news/n0506-female-amazon-warrior-buried-2500-years-ago-in-altai-mountains-was-male/
76. Sierp, I., & Henneberg, M. (2015). The difficulty of sexing skeletons from unknown populations. Journal of Anthropology, 2015, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/908535
77. Sivarajasingam, V., Read, S., Svobodova, M., Wight, L., & Shepherd, J. (2018). Injury resulting from targeted violence: An emergency department perspective. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 28(3), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2066
78. Spencer, L. (2019). Bathroom bills, memes, and a biopolitics of trans disposability. Western Journal of Communication, 83(5), 542-559. DOI: 10.1080/10570314.2019.1615635
79. Spradley, K. (2016). Metric methods for the biological profile in forensic anthropology: sex, ancestry, and stature. Academic Forensic Pathology, 6(3), 391-399. https://doi.org/10.23907/2016.040
80. Spradley, K., & Jantz, R. (2011). Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: Skull versus postcranial elements: Journal of Forensic Sciences, 56(2), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01635.x
81. Statistics Canada. (2020). Table 13-10-0387-01 Coroner and medical examiner investigated deaths and mortality rates, by sex. Retrieved 2021 January 19 from https://doi.org/10.25318/1310038701-eng
82. Statistics Canada (2019) Sex at birth and gender: Technical report on changes for the 2021 Census. Retrieved 2021 January 19 from https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/ref/98-20-0002/982000022020002-eng.cfm.
83. Stotzer, R. (2009). Violence against transgender people: A review of United States data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(3), 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.01.006
84. Stotzer, R. (2014). Law enforcement and criminal justice personnel interactions with transgender people in the United States: A literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(3), 263-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.012
85. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview. In (Eds.): N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln Handbook of Qualitative Research. 1st ed. SAGE Publications Inc.: Oxford, UK.
86. Sutherland, L., & Suchey, J. (1991). Use of the ventral arc in pubic sex determination. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36(2), 501-511.
87. Tallman, S. (2019). Cranial nonmetric sexual dimorphism and sex estimation in East and Southeast Asian individuals. Forensic Anthropology, 2(4), 204-221.
88. Tallman, S., Kincer, C. & Plemons, E. (2020). Centering Transgender individuals in forensic anthropology and expanding binary sex estimation in casework and research. Forensic Anthropology, online, DOI: 10.5744/fa.2020.0030.
89. Tebbe, E., and Moradi, B. (2012). Anti-transgender prejudice: A structural equation model of associated constructs. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(2), 251-261. DOI: 10.1037/a0026990
90. Tebbe, E., and Moradi, B. (2016). Suicide risk in trans populations: An application of minority stress theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(5), 520-533. dx.doi.org/10.1037/cou0000152
91. Toussaint M. (2019). The dead don’t bury themselves: reflections on atypical burial arrangements and gender in Mierzanowice culture cemeteries. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 71, 65-88.
92. Trans Doe Task Force (2020.) Case Map. Trans Doe Task Force Case Map. Retrieved 2020 November 16 from https://transdoetaskforce.org/case-map.
93. Van Caenegem, E., Taes, Y., Wierckx, K., Vandewalle, S., Toye, K., Kaufman, J., Schreiner, T., Haraldsen, I., & T’Sjoen, G. (2013). Low bone mass is prevalent in male-to-female transsexual persons before the start of cross-sex hormonal therapy and gonadectomy. Bone, 54(1), 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2013.01.039
94. Van Caenegem, E, Wierckx, K., Taes, Y., Schreiner, T., Vandewalle, S., Toye, K., Lapauw, B., Kaufman, J, & T’Sjoen, G. (2015). Body composition, bone turnover, and bone mass in trans men during testosterone treatment: 1-year follow-up data from a prospective case–controlled study (ENIGI). European Journal of Endocrinology, 172(2), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-14-0586
95. Van Caenegem, Eva, & TʼSjoen, G. (2015). Bone in trans persons: Current Opinion. Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity, 22(6), 459-466. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000202
96. Veale, J., Clarke, E. and Lomax, T. (2010). Biological and psychosocial correlates of adult gender-variant identities. Personality and Individual Differences 48(4), pp 357-366.
97. Ubelaker, D., & Volk, C. (2002). A test of the Phenice method for the estimation of sex. Journal of forensic sciences, 47(1), 19-24.
98. Weaver, K. (2020). Paying your respects: transgender women and detransitioning after death”. Death Studies 44(1), 58-64.
99. Weller, S. (2017). Using internet video calls in qualitative (longitudinal) interviews: Some implications for rapport. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 613-625. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1269505.
100. Whitestone, S., Giles, H., & Linz, D. (2020). Overcoming ungrievability: transgender expectations for identity after death. Sociological Inquiry, 90(2), 316-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12357
101. Wiepjes, C., Blok, C., Staphorsius, A., Nota, N. Vlot, M., Jongh, R., & Heijer, M. (2020). Fracture risk in trans women and trans men using long‐term gender‐affirming hormonal treatment: A nationwide cohort study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 35(1), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3862
102. Wiepjes, C., de Jongh, R., de Blok, C., Vlot, M., Lips, P., Twisk, J., & den Heijer, M. (2019). Bone safety during the first ten years of gender‐affirming hormonal treatment in trans women and trans men. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 34(3), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3612
103. Wiepjes, C, Vlot, M., de Blok, C., Nota, N., de Jongh, R., & den Heijer, M. (2019). Bone geometry and trabecular bone score in transgender people before and after short- and long-term hormonal treatment. Bone, 127, 280-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2019.06.029
104. Weiss, E. (2014). Can we create ethnically diverse skeletal collection from donated bodies?. Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 72(1), 43-53.
105. Weiss, J. (2009). Chapter 2: teaching transgender issues: Global social movements based on gender identity. In: A twenty-first century approach to teaching social justice: educating for both advocacy and action. Counterpoints, 358, 27-38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42980362
106. World Health Organization (2015). Sexual health, human rights and the law. Retrieved May 1, 2021 from https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/sexual_health/sexual-health-human-rights-law/en/
107. Zhang, S. (23 December 2019). “Sleuths Are Haunted by the Cold Case of Julie Doe” The Atlantic. Retrieved 2021 January 20 from https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/12/self-taught-sleuths-trying-solve-trans-murders/603976/
71 notes
·
View notes