#receptaculum | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

tinyshe · 4 years

Video

youtube

Gregorian chant - Benedictine Nuns of St. Cecilia's Abbey - Litaniae Sacratissimi Cordis Iesu: Kyrie, eleison. Christe, eleison. Kyrie, eleison. Christe, audi nos. Christe, exaudi nos. Pater de caelis, Deus, miserere nobis. Fili, Redemptor mundi, Deus, miserere nobis. Spiritus Sancte, Deus, miserere nobis. Sancta Trinitas, unus Deus, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, Filii Patris aeterni, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, in sinu Virginis Matris, a Spiritu Sancto formatum, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, Verbo Dei substantialiter unitum, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, maiestatis infinitae, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, templum Dei sanctum, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, tabernaculum Altissimi, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, domus Dei et porta caeli, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, fornax ardens caritatis, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, iustitiae et amoris receptaculum, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, bonitate et amore plenum, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, virtutum omnium abyssus, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, omni laude dignissimum, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, rex et centrum omnium cordium, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, in quo sunt omnes thesauri sapientiae et scientiae, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, in quo habitat omnis plenitudo, divinitatis, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, in quo Pater sibi bene complacuit, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, de cuius plenitudine omnes nos accepimus, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, desiderium collium aeternorum, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, patiens et multae misericordiae, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, dives in omnes qui invocant te, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, fons vitae et sanctitatis, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, propitiatio pro peccatis nostris, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, saturatum opprobriis, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, attritum propter scelera nostra, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, usque ad mortem obediens factum, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, lancea perforatum, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, fons totius consolationis, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, vita et resurrectio nostra, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, pax et reconciliatio nostra, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, victima peccatorum, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, salus in te sperantium, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, spes in te morientium, miserere nobis. Cor Iesu, deliciae Sanctorum omnium, miserere nobis. Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi, parce nobis, Domine. Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi, exaudi nos, Domine. Agnus Dei, qui tollis peccata mundi, miserere nobis. V. Iesu, mitis et humilis corde, R. Fac cor nostrum secundum Cor tuum. Oremus. Omnipotens sempiterne Deus, respice in Cor dilectissimi Filii tui, et in laudes et satisfactiones, quas in nomine peccatorum tibi persolvit, iisque misericordiam tuam petentibus tu veniam concede placatus, in nomine eiusdem Filii tui Iesu Christi: Qui tecum vivit et regnat in saecula saeculorum. R. Amen.

#catholic #chant #litany of sacred heart #latin chant #benedictine nuns #st cecilia abbey

3 notes · View notes

pragmata-gallery · 5 years

Text

“Vellum Receptaculum”

efusa washi paper works exhibition

和紙オブジェ個展

#efusa #washi paper #exhibition #pragmata #pragmata gallery #pragmatagallery #art gallery #gallery #tokyo #和紙 #個展 #プラグマタ #プラグマタギャラリー #プラグマタギャラリー #アートギャラリー #ギャラリー #八丁堀 #東京

13 notes · View notes

littleandroidwrites · 5 years

Note

♟ (a desperate kiss) for Thenry and Delaware

Happy (late) birthday @galacticbois! This is for all the times I tell you you’re not valid and also, objectively, Bad. I never really mean it. I bicker with you the way I bicker with my sister because to me, you’re family. It’s been so long and I am so lucky.

Little metal and wire bots zipped and zapped around the place, about the same height of her shins and about the same manic energy as her mind. Delaware didn’t take any notice of them, though, ferrying parts to buyers across the universe. She was preoccupied with the blue hologram in front of her, flickering pitilessly because the projector it originated from was almost a century out of date.

“Little girl,” The alien behind the counter said, his antenna moving slowly back and forth, like a scanner searching for any ounce of patience, “There ain’t nothing here you can afford.”

Bastard. But of course the old scrapper was. He dealt with people wasting his time all day long. Again, Delaware looked at her little projector. If she had any sense she’d trade it in, but she’d never claimed to have any sense. All heart, no head. And the dusty old knick knack was the first thing she’d ever repaired herself. She was keeping it.

“What I can’t afford is to have a broken down ship.” Delaware finally looked up at the alien through the grimy yellow air of the pit-slash-market. It was something like thirty feet underground, the atmosphere of this planet too toxic for half of the species that lived here. Days like this, she hated being human. She wished she was something more hardy. Maybe a spliced cockroach of some kind.

At the end of the universe, there would be cockroaches and Delaware.

“Malyshka, if you don’t got anything to give me, I don’t got any way to help you.”

“It says right here on this stupid form --” She jammed her finger toward the flickering hologram in front of her. “-- that you accept credit. So why would you say that if you don’t mean it?”

His inky black eyes blinked at her, left and right like sliding doors. His little purple mouth was screwed up like the bottom of a balloon. Delaware was pretty sure he wasn’t just about to let out air.

“Fine. Fine.” She snatched her rectangular projector, cutting her finger on the jagged edges and pretending she hadn’t out of grim pride. “I’ll get stranded here and die.”

“Yeah, yeah.”

“Do you have a family?” The scrapper was already turning to the next customer. “I’m sure they’d be really proud.”

“Dosvedanya.”

Delaware kicked dirt and trash all the way out of the market, back to the field of abandoned spacecrafts she called a home. In amongst them was her crashed Receptaculum Purgamentorum, red and rusty and magnificent and proud and a little sad right now but perfect and hers and redeemable.

The big suicide door opened for her with a soft woosh after she pressed her hand up to it’s scanner. It sounded like welcome home. She tossed her projector to the side, not resentful that it had hurt her, but treating it to a little timeout while she recovered. She went about kicking a stool into place so she could rifle through the cabinets above her head, blowing strands of hair out of her face. She pushed and prodded at junk and found a pile of bandaids, three of which she applied haphazardly to her hand in a starburst formation. Once that was done, she slammed the doors shut. Stepped off her stool. Looked out the little pigeonhole window to the junkyard.

“You and me, Machine. And the rest of this useless planet.”

“Well.” A deep rumble. Delaware froze, hand on the back of her neck, half way to tying back her filthy hair back from her filthy face. “I wouldn’t say useless. I got you this, didn’t I?”

Something cool and solid touched her back. Finally, she turned. Looked up, up. A smile that made her chest feel like collapsing.

“You don’t even wanna look at it?” Thenry offered her the contraption again, this time stopping just before her chest. Delaware grabbed his wrist to hold him in place.

“Have you just been hanging around my ship?” Shit. Her tone was way off. Breathy like she was hopeful. Like he’d sucked all the air out of the shuttle and he was the only source of oxygen. “Creepy bastard.”

Thenry only grinned at her, hearing her words but knowing her too well not to find the truth beneath them.

Delaware looked down at the device in the palm of his hand. His quiet laugh said he knew it was because she couldn’t look him in the face anymore.

“What is it?”

“You don’t know?” He teased, and she wanted to punch him, directly between his pretty eyes, because she would have if she could concentrate. She squeezed his wrist hard, nails almost digging in. He laughed a little. “Ow.”

“It’s...” Delaware’s brow lowered. She arched forward, inspecting. “Is this a compression chamber?”

“Could be.”

“Right model?”

“Might work.”

He was being coy. Now she didn’t want to punch him at all, so she did. Right in his chest. Thenry took a half step back, absorbing the force easily because she hadn’t hit hard; she was too busy grinning up at him, feeling pleased to the point of near nausea.

“Where did you get this? How did you get this? Damn!” She laughed, disbelieving as she looked down at the big shining metal, twice the size of her fist. It was rare to come across parts that fit her old craft; they’d gone out of manufacture more than a decade ago. “I was down in the pit all day and didn’t even come close!”

Thenry shrugged. She followed the motion back up to his pretty face. Her heart was beating absurdly fast, trying to escape her chest to smash into his smile. Disgusting. He made her abjectly disgusting.

This threw her forward at least a month, maybe two in her ship repairs. A couple more parts -- easy parts, too, ones that could be welded down to fit her needs or adapted together -- and there’d be take off. Her little craft, all ready for flying again. God, Delaware had missed it. Her heart ached. She looked around the shuttle, the wires that hung loose from the ceiling and the torn up upholstery and she was so absurdly fond. Her bright eyes found Thenry’s face again.

It was a two person job, their mouths meeting. He bent down and she listed up on her toes, securing her arms around his neck. She kissed him for a second with her hands in his hair and then broke away to watch him carefully, carefully find a counter to place the compression chamber onto and then went back in, dizzy with wanting. Wanting for so many things. Her breath mingled with his own and she was suddenly choked up. Thenry let her stay not two inches from his face because he understood what this was, too.

Less than a month it’d take her to fix up her craft. Less than a month before she could set off on her way back to her own dimension. The one where Thenry didn’t breathe at all.

Delaware felt a gentle tug on her hair, and opened her eyes to see Thenry was smiling at her. Not like before. Smaller. A lie of a smile, because it was sad. “You’re gonna go home.”

I am home, she didn’t say. Because her home just looked like this. Because her home just had these eyes and this smile and that infuriating knack for saying just the things that made her angry but was not this. Because her home was gone. Dead. Because this Thenry wasn’t hers, and they both knew it.

Delaware kissed him again. Softly, now. Breathing him in. He kissed her back, his fingers threading near the base of her scalp. To think, this would be one of the last times she felt this. This Thenry, not her Thenry, and the only Thenry she would ever have again.

He pulled away, running a thumb over her cheek because he’d noticed her tears before she did. The pads of his fingers came away darker, the dust of the day on his thumbprint.

“It’s a dirty world out there.” He murmured, and Delaware had forgotten it existed at all.

#otp: you can't fight fate but i can fight you #askmeme #you ever write a meme about thelaware for the first time only to make it an alternate universe jsut to flex on nikyta?#baerwinthrop

4 notes · View notes

birdwingcammo-blog · 5 years

Text

WELL, THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST DISGUSTING MUSHROOM/FUNGUS I HAVE EVER SEEN 😂

Phallaceae is a family of fungi, commonly known as stinkhorn mushrooms, within the order Phallales. Stinkhorns have a worldwide distribution, but are especially prevalent in tropical regions. They are known for their foul-smelling, sticky spore masses, or gleba, borne on the end of stalk called the receptaculum.

Information Green (C) from the most helpful website.. G O O G L E

1 note · View note

vintagekrissword · 2 years

Text

Specialis et Unique Kris Javanese Keris Tilam Sari Pamor Batu Magistri Empu Bekel Jati Sepuh

Dhapur Keris (genus figurae keris): Tilam Sari

Dignitas (forma plicarum ferrearum): Stone

Tangguh (aestimari tempus fabricandi): Tuban (Empu Bekel Teak)

Ferrum Longitudo: 36.3cm

Warangka : Gayaman Surakarta Axle Iras Wood Trembalo Banana Antiqua

Palpate / palpate : Antiquae Bang Kemuning Wood

Pendok: Blewah Surakarta mamas Antiquae Fine Carving

Mendak : Kuningan

Sensus Dhapur Jalak Tilam Sari sensus est: "sturnus" hominem significat ut pater familias, "Tilam" ut locus cubandi, locus quietis, vel latius interpretatus locus est. vivo, Sari fragrans, fragrans, fragrans. Sensus Starling Tilam Sari ulterius examinatus est ferre sensum recipiendi receptaculum quod fragrat tam coram Deo omnipotente quam hominibus hominibus. Notio orationis domini quae expectatur pro Jalak Tilam Sari keris est quod dominus tamquam princeps familiae qui praeest lucrandi vivos et familiares qui curam Jalak Tilam Sari keris gloriam semper obtinebunt. felix, pax, fragrans nomen, a circumstantibus honoratum, et a Deo optimo maximo semper suscipiat protectionem.

Valde integrum kris, genus valde crassum et validissimum cum palmis bekeljati, cum unico 3 dimensiva pamor lapidis lapak iuncta est. Vere dignum est colligere.

Originale C% vetus keris

https://www.etsy.com/listing/1065987310/very-special-and-unique-kris-javanese

#JavaneseKrisSword #KrisBladeSword #KrisBladeDagger #IndonesianDagger #JavaneseKris #IndonesianKris

0 notes

meme-constructor · 3 years

Text

There are only 2 genders: post-exilic and receptaculum

0 notes

biblenomad · 3 years

Photo

There really is a lot of #weird stuff growing in #nature !! This is in my backyard... #fungusamongus #fungus #clathruscolumnatus #columnatus column #stinkhorn #stinkhornmushroom Website says it’s #edible - #nothanks Source: Wikipedia Clathrus columnatus, commonly known as the column stinkhorn, is a saprobic species of basidiomycete fungus in the family Phallaceae. It has a widespread distribution, and has been found in Africa, Australasia, and the Americas. It may have been introduced to North America with exotic plants. Similar to other stinkhorn fungi, the fruiting body, known as the receptaculum, starts out as a subterranean "egg" form. As the fungus develops, the receptaculum expands and erupts out of the protective volva, ultimately developing into mature structures characterized by two to five long vertical orange or red spongy columns, joined together at the apex. The fully grown receptaculum reaches heights of 8 cm (3.1 in) tall. The inside surfaces of the columns are covered with a fetid olive-brown spore-containing slime, which attracts flies and other insects that help disseminate the spores. Although once considered undesirable, the fungus is listed as edible. It is found commonly in mulch. #naturephotography #botany #plantlife #fungi #fungiphotography (at Jacksonville Beach, Florida) https://www.instagram.com/p/CLfEgNlr5PP/?igshid=1s8losw7vqy03

#weird #nature #fungusamongus #fungus #clathruscolumnatus #columnatus #stinkhorn #stinkhornmushroom #edible #nothanks #naturephotography #botany #plantlife #fungi #fungiphotography

0 notes

thatguy-2357 · 7 years

Text

@receptaculum-purgamentorum is a mean

#omg #he made me do this #sorry everyone #i speak

9 notes · View notes

loyallogic · 5 years

Text

Section 462 of Indian Penal Code and Criminal Trespass

This article is written by Anjali Dhingra, IInd year student, B.B.A. LL.B, Symbiosis Law School, NOIDA. In this article, the author discusses the origin of the concept of trespass in English law. To substantiate the concept, the reference is made to section 462 of The Indian Penal Code and its elements are discussed in detail.

Introduction

The major reason for having laws in the country is for the protection of life, liberty and property of all the citizens along with maintaining peace in the country. India, for penal laws, follows the Indian Penal Code, 1860. One of the important aspects of making IPC is to ensure the right to property to the individuals and also to restrain individuals from interfering or damaging the property of others. For the same reason, the concept of offences against property was added to the penal law and the topic of criminal within.

At one time in history, trespassing was considered a fairly major crime, many times punishable by fines or jail time. Currently, in most state jurisdictions, trespassing is considered a misdemeanour, that of a minor crime. In this article, we will be discussing criminal trespass with special reference to Section 462 of IPC.

Section 462 IPC- Meaning and Elements

The concept of trespass was introduced as a breach to the peace of an individual. Until the law had not stated, trespass was not considered to be a crime for the general public. In the early common law criminal trespass was unknown. The statutes under which sit-in demonstrators have been arrested and convicted, while virtually identical in effect, vary greatly in their wordings.

At that time, criminal trespass laws were not accepted as it was stated that these laws cannot co-exist with the racial discrimination laws. To make criminal trespass as a part of the current legislation, the court was in need of valid reasoning and argument. The Court said that they are open for taking into account possible applications of the statute in other factual contexts.[11]

In many jurisdictions, the crime of trespass still has many common law elements used in early England. The section we are dealing with here is related to section 462 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The section makes a person liable if a property is entrusted with him and he tries to open that receptacle containing property, with intent to commit mischief or dishonesty.

The elements of Section 462 of The Indian Penal Code are discussed below:

There was a receptacle, closed or fastened

The section requires a receptacle to be there. The word ‘receptacle’ is derived from the Latin word receptaculum i.e. a means which receives or holds a thing. As per the Oxford dictionary, it is defined as a repository for anything. It can be a chest, box, safe, closed package, a room, part of the room, warehouse or go-down as well.[3]

Further, the receptacle must be closed or fastened. It can be chained, locked or simply bolted as well.

The accused was entrusted with the receptacle closed or fastened and had no right to open the receptacle

Section 461 of IPC also deals with the same offence. The only difference it makes is the factor of trust in Sec. 462. Here, the person is entrusted with the property. This is the reason that punishment under this section is graver than that under section 461 of the Code. There is no such information stating whether the person who is entrusting the accused with the property is the owner of the goods or not. But the possession of the receptacle at the time of committing of the offence is with the accused.

Although the accused is entrusted with the property, he/she is not authorised to open or unfasten the same. Now, the question that arises is that will the accused be held liable for breach of trust?

Breach of trust is also divided into the civil and criminal breach as criminal breach defined under Section 405 of IPC. Section 405 expressly mentions the term ‘dishonest misappropriation’ and ‘Conversion’ of property which can be the result of the act of the accused if he goes further after opening the receptacle.

It contained property or the accused believed that it did contain a property

It is an important factor for the offence. There must be property inside the receptacle or at least the accused must be in a belief that the receptacle contains a property. The property can be movable or immovable (such as a ceiling fan) which the accused desired to have access.

The accused brakes open or unfasten it

It is not necessary for the receptacle to be locked or chained. Even if it is just bolted and the person opens the bolt, it will come under this section. There needs to be something which has to be unfastened or broken in order to commit this offence. The offence in the section is committed the time receptacle is opened or unfastened.

The accused did so dishonestly or with an intent to commit mischief

The most important condition is the mens-rea element in the offence. The intention of the accused needs to be looked into before reaching the conclusion. The unfastening or opening of the receptacle needs to be done with dishonesty or with intent to commit mischief. All the elements related to the section which includes criminal trespass, dishonesty, mischief or breach of trust includes the element of intent.

Dishonesty is defined in Section 24 of IPC which explains it as an act done with the intention of causing wrongful gain or loss. The primary intention of the actor needs to be the commission of dishonesty. The act of dishonesty applies only to that of ‘property’ i.e. the intent needs to be the wrongful gain or loss of property or pecuniary or economic gain or loss.

It is the intention that which is important and not whether a man is under a legal duty to disclose or suppress facts within his knowledge[4]. Therefore, where a person with the intention of causing wrongful loss to another makes a false representation to him or suppress certain facts, he will be said to have acted dishonestly even if the law does not require him to state the truth.[5] The only test which can help in discovering a man’s intention is by looking at what he actually did and by considering what must have appeared to him at the time of natural consequences of his conduct.[6]

The other reason behind the act of the accused can be intent to commit mischief. Mischief is defined under section 425 of IPC. It is denoted by any act which is caused with the Intention to cause wrongful loss or damage to the public or any person. Its major element is also Intent. Any act cannot be covered under mischief if no knowledge of requirements under this section or the act was the result of an accident or negligence.

In both the cases of dishonesty and mischief, intention cannot be concluded in case there is any conflict of ownership of that property. If the accused has done the act in an impression of considering the good to be his own, he cannot be held liable. Same is the case where the property has no owner. No person can be held liable for wrongful act or trespass against a property which has no owner.

Click Here

The Origin of Trespass in Common Law

The concept of trespass originated in England in the thirteenth century as a general concept which indicates that the defendant had done a wrong and should, therefore, pay damages and be fined. The main emphasis was on providing civil remedies such as payment of damages or return of possession as there was no clear distinction between civil and criminal wrong.

Parliament adopted criminal statutes in the late fourteenth century prohibiting forcible entry on real property. This legislative scheme was further developed in the next two and a half centuries, primarily to provide for the return of possession and to prohibit forcible detainers who refuse to leave the property.

A series of English cases explicitly recognized for the first time the existence of the common law crime of criminal trespass in the first half of the eighteenth century. This development took a long time because of a variety of factors:

the existence of civil remedies for the tort of trespass;

the availability of the legislation concerning forcible entry and detainer, which provided both a civil remedy and criminal sanctions;

the failure to remedy certain conditions such as the general weakness of the executive branch of government and thus of the means for prosecuting the crime—until the sixteenth century.

The recognition of the crime of criminal trespass was complete by the time of the American Revolution, and the individual states adopted the common law crime of criminal trespass.[1]

The common law of criminal trespass was introduced to protect against intruders who poach, steal livestock and crops, or vandalise property[2]. Under common law, an action for trespass to goods lay for intentional and direct interference with another’s possession of goods. Thus, it is the interference of possession and not the title of goods. There is no requirement that the claimant should suffer any damages.

In early English common law, trespassing on the property, particularly that of the king, was considered a criminal matter. It was later in the 14th century, that landowners could sue the trespasser for civil damages. In the early 13th century in England, under common law, the king considered trespassing as a breach of his peace and would summon the trespassers to appear in the court.

This summon was a writ that the king would use to notify the defendant of the charges. Often times, the wrongdoer was fined, but many had no money and were sent to jail instead. It was in the latter part of the 14th century that the money collected from the fines was given to the landowners as a method of repayment for any damages caused by the trespasser.[10]

Conclusion and Suggestion

A person may be entrusted with a closed receptacle, for any purpose, whether by way of security or for safe custody. In either case, if it is closed and deposited, the depositee has no right to open it, but if he opens it, he commits no offence unless his intention was dishonest or mischievous. If however, he is given authority to open it, his opening it dishonestly is not punishable, though he would be, of course, liable under the general law for any offence he may commit respecting it.[7]

The scope of this section is very limited today. There are very limited cases relating to an offence u/s 462 because the act under this section being triable as a summons case, the framing of a formal charge is not necessary u/s 251 of Cr PC. The other reason can be that opening any receptacle without permission is considered as just a civil act of trespass and majorly not reported.

A layman does not consider it as a grave offence and thus it gets neglected if the accused is not able to fulfil his intention of maybe theft or mischief. Trespass to chattels requires interference with the goods and the person is liable as soon as he interferes with the property. There is no requirement that the claimant suffers damage; once the interference has been established, the act is actionable per se.[8]

Moreover, the difference of trust between section 461 and 462 made the offence under section 462 more grave and thus punishment was increased to Three years than two years. But, the offence under 461 is non-bailable and that under 462 is bailable although considered to be graver.

The act under this section makes a person liable for 3 years of imprisonment or fine or both. Along with this act, the act of intention to commit mischief or dishonesty and breach of trust is also committed. Will the person be liable for these acts in case the act is completed which they intend to do such as theft or mischief. Or, since the act is not completed, it will be considered as an inchoate offence. But, as soon as the receptacle is broken open or unfastened, the offence is complete.[9]

Bibliography

HUBBARD, F. P., & Khan, D. M. (n.d.). Criminal Trespass – Historical Background – Civil, Forcible, Century, and Crime. Retrieved January 17, 2019, from Law library: American Law and legal information

Oliver v. US, 466 US 170

The Shorter Oxford Dictionary, 3rd edn., Vol. 1, 1970

Sawariya, S. K. (2008). Dishonesty. In R. Nelson, RA Nelson’s Indian Penal Code (p. 156). Nagpur: Butterworths Wadhwa.

Kuldeep Singh v. State, AIR 1954 Punj 31, pg. 33

Stephen’s history of the Criminal Law, vol II, p. 111

Gaur, K. D. (2018). Of offences against property. In K. D. Gaur, Textbook on Indian Penal Code (p. 1003). Gurgaon: Lexis Nexis.

Leitch & Co. Ltd. V. Leydon [1931] AC 90 at 106

Queen v. Tasuduk Hossein, (1874) 6 NWP 301

The Shorter Oxford Dictionary, 3rd edn., Vol. 1, 1970

Comments. (1963-1964). Tulane Law Review, 104-155

The post Section 462 of Indian Penal Code and Criminal Trespass appeared first on iPleaders.

Section 462 of Indian Penal Code and Criminal Trespass published first on https://namechangers.tumblr.com/

0 notes

dinhthang · 5 years

Link

CÂY SEN - Công dụng và liều dùng Dùng chữa tim hồi hộp, mất ngủ, di mộng tinh. Ngày uống 4-10g tâm sen khô dưới dạng thuốc sắc hay thuốc pha, có thể thêm đường cho dễ uống. Theo tài liệu cổ, tâm sen có vị đắng, tính hàn. Có tác dụng thanh tâm khứ nhiệt. Dùng chữa tâm phiền, thổ huyết. Những Vị thuốc khác lấy từ sen ra: 1. Liên ngẫu Ngó sen - Nơdus Rhizomatis Loti. Trong ngó sen có asparagin 2% acginin, trigonelin, tyrocin, ête photphoric, glucoza, vitamin C. Trigonelin C7H7NO2 kết tinh trong rượu loãng sẽ ngậm 1 phân tử nước. Nếu đun tới 100°C sẽ mất nước. Độ chảy 218°. rất dễ tan trong nước, trong rượu, gần như không tan trong ête và clorofoc. Công dụng và liều dùng: Làm thức ăn, thuốc cầm máu, dùng trong những trường hợp đi ngoài ra máu, tiểu tiện ra máu, nôn ra máu, máu cam, tử cung xuất huyết. Ngày dùng từ 6-l2g dưới dạng thuốc sắc. 2. Thạch liên tử Fructus Nelumbinis - ta vẫn gọi nhầm là hạt sen chính là quả sen, có vỏ quả, nếu bóc lấy hạt, ta sẽ được liên nhục hay liên tử (Semen Nelumbinis). Trong liên nhục, người ta đã phân tích thấy có nhiều tinh bột, trigonelin, đường (raffinoza) C18H32O165H2O, protit 16,6%, chất béo 2%, cacbon hydrat 62%-canxi 0,089%, photpho 0,285%, sắt (Fe) 0,0064%. Công dụng và liều dùng: Thạch liên tử thường dùng chữa lỵ cấm khẩu với liều từ 6 đến 12g dưới dạng thuốc sắc. Liên nhục: Thuốc bổ, cố tinh, chữa di tinh, mất ngủ, thần kinh suy nhược. Ngày dùng từ 10 đến 30g dưới dạng sắc hay thuốc bột. Theo tài liệu cổ liên tử vị ngọt, tính bình. Có tác dụng bổ tỳ, dưỡng tâm, sáp trường, cố tinh. Dùng chữa tỳ hư sinh tiết tả (ỉa chảy), di mộng tinh, băng lậu, đới hạ. 3. Liên phòng Receptaculum Nelumbinis là gương sen già sau khi đã lấy hết quả rồi, phơi khô. Trong liên phòng có protit 4,9%, chất béo 0,6%, cacbon hydrat 9%, carotin 0,00002%, nuclein 0,00009%, vitamin C 0,017%. Công dụng và liều dùng: Thuốc cầm máu: Dùng chữa bệnh đi đại tiện ra máu, bệnh băng đới. Ngày dùng 15-30g dưới dạng thuốc sắc. Theo tài liệu cổ liên phòng có vị đắng, chát, tính ôn, vào 2 kinh can và tâm bào. Có tác dụng tiêu ứ, cầm máu. Dùng chữa ứ huyết bụng đau, đẻ xong nhau chưa ra, băng huyết, tiểu tiện ra máu, tiểu tiện khó khăn. Đơn thuốc chữa băng huyết sau khi đẻ: Gương sen 5 cái, hương phụ 80g. Đốt cháy, tán nhỏ. Ngày uống 8-24g, chia 2-3 lần uống. 4. Lá sen: Hà diệp - Folium Loti. Trong lá sen có chừng 0,20-0,30% tanin, một lượng nhỏ ancaloit gồm nuxiferin C19H21O2N, nonuxiferin C18H19O2N và roemerin C18H17O2N các chất khác chưa rõ. Trong cuống lá có một lượng nhỏ roemerin và nonuxiferin. Công dụng và liều dùng: Thường người ta cho lá sen cùng một công dụng với gương sen. Nhưng khi bệnh cấp thì dùng lá sen. Liều dùng 15-20g: Dưới dạng thuốc sắc. Theo tài liệu cổ lá sen vị đắng tính bình, vào 3 kinh can, tỳ và vị. Có tác dụng thăng thanh tán ứ, thanh thử hành thuỷ. Dùng chữa thử thấp tiết tả, thủy chí phù thũng, lôi đầu phong, nôn ra máu, máu cam, băng trung huyết lỵ. 5. Liên tu Stamen Nelumbinis tức là tua nhị đực của hoa sen bỏ hạt gạo đi, rồi phơi khô. Thành phần hoá học: Tanin, các chất khác chưa rõ. Công dụng và liều dùng. Chữa băng huyết, thổ huyết, di mộng tinh. Ngày uống 5-10g dưới dạng thuốc sắc.

#lamthuoc.net-Nguyên liệu làm thuốc #Thuốc Ngủ-An Thần-Trấn Kinh

0 notes