#source: skippy’s list | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

parodyroyalle · 2 years

Note

Hello, I read your post on Skippy's blog. You mention a person named Angelina Bentivegna, who is an actress today and her biography can be seen on IMDB. According to IMDB she did indeed go missing as a toddler and was adopted by the Thompson family. How is this connected to the Harkles? Thank you.

Hi Mary thank you for your question.

Thank you Skippy for the reblog.

This question is related to the reblog timelines.

And from the archives since deleted after the hacks.

I was able to find some gems from other archived bloggers.

This may be hard to follow in pieces. I will do my best to outline.

Any other questions, I will try to find the source for you,

This may be confusing as 'Angelina' intercepts two ways.

Closest Timeline:

2013-2014-2015-2016 Emmanuel Jal and Rachel Meghan Markle

2013-2014-2015-2016 Emmanuel Jal and Angelina Bentivegna

Older Timeline:

2008 Alyssa Pallett and Nina Schick

Connection = UK, SOHO and much more allegedly

Who is in the background? Angelina

Oldest Timeline:

2007 Alyssa Pallett TORONTO NYC MIAMI UK

Jeffery Epstein, Black Book connections, to Pallett with Brant.

Google open source connects JE black book to Brant

Google open source connects Brant to Pallet.

Who was in the background? Angelina

How do these timelines intercept?

Drop in the tid bit from Julie re Anon and add Angelina's social media helped put the puzzle together.

Starting at the most resent:

2016

Angelina social media with Emmanuel Jal

It was open source, it is now private.

Some archives can be found on IMDB and Google.

( comes up in search bar Facebook search )

www.facebook.com/ emmanuel.jal.9/videos/10154089969291006

Insta now closed shows them in the record studio promoting

Be Inspired, a kindness and peace campaign

Created by Angelina as a teen.

Inspired by The Bible.

( Facebook archives and IMDB )

2015

Most recent connection that was reported of Markle public with Jal would be Soho UK yet much has been scrubbed and notice no one really discusses the obvious points like the whole network that comes with Emmanuel. See below.

According to a quick Google search:

youtube

Meghan Markle & Emmanuel Jal - Kruger Cowne Breakfast Club

Posted on Mar 13, 2015 ---- time stamped upload

The video is taken at Soho in UK

What is interesting is an Anon mentioned something about money being borrowed to front the cost of joining this PR campaign from the ex Toronto Chef CV. Was it to join or to pay off?

What is interesting here is Markle and Jal were already spotted in World Vision's Artist Partnership. This was removed from World Vision. Interesting that this was from 2013-2014-2015 time line. Google search reveals World Vision has changed it's marketing and now lists Markle as 2016 but small print reveals the date 2013. I guestimate the shorter end of the timeline 2013-2014-2015.

What is also interesting is the connection of Clooney's and Witherspoon and Mandela etc. All that are contacts of Emmanuel Jal in one networking source. Take a look into the records and see how many dots pop up. I am surprised this is not pointed out more. I am also not surprised because of seemingly try to cover connections.

More time line connects to this article here:

The years to watch here are 2013-2014- 2015,

Spectators know what took place in 2016 and 2017 with Harkles.

The Wedding.

Now, on the IMDB you will see Suits mentioned.

There is also two photos. Emmanuel Jal and Angelina.

In the photographs there is one from 2008 from SOHO UK.

There is also a video of the event on Youtube from that time.

Allegedly she dropped acting after being warned about trafficking.

Here is where it gets interesting interesting.

Notice the blogspot.com post writes Markle inspired Emmanuel?

They were spotted on World Vision under the Artist Program.

This page has since been scrubbed but other archives may be found.

Emmanuel Jal was introduced to Angelina to collaborate. Facebook.

They did in fact collaborate during the same timeline as Markle.

Markle is then one stone away from Bentivegna on that connection.

The Be Inspired Campaign since 2006 or earlier according to Google.

When this was open source, there were videos of them together.

By them, I am not referring to Markle but Jal and Bentivegna.

A deep dive into social media archives indicates:

Angelina's social media shows she is a monarchist, military supporter and has corresponded with the Queen. Affiliated with St. John Ambulance. It shows she documented a history of being a missing 'missing' person who has been an activist over the years and aided in fundraising for many campaigns including Save The Children and Harry's Patronage The ROM in Toronto, which is a museum. This means Angelina and Harry are also a stone hop connection away.

Mary, you are correct as it is reported she is an adoptee which again circles to Emmanuel being adopted and has a sister named Angelina according to his book. A deeper dive shows activism for Indigenous, Adoptee Birth Rights. I was able to find several open case works including a Change.Org petition and many posts calling for change.

I did find it interesting that Major Thompson was featured and there is a photo of Her Majesty with a Tommy which makes for good storytelling as I did not find any connection they are related. This of course may or may not be relevant. I for one like to take all the dots and stick them up on the board and deduce accordingly. Synchronicities like this make research fun. Take with a grain of salt.

I did notice an open source post on Twitter that listed her Grandfather helped fight during the war in Holland and Ricky Gervais liked it. There is no mention of acting to date but there is mention of working on releasing something pertaining to gonzo journalism. IMDB showed something was in the works but LinkedIn shows stopped after work destroyed in a Fire. This can be fact checked.

Danja Zone had mentioned this connection years ago in a video very briefly. Many people came out of the wood works back then. I think Danja Zone and Skippy were communicating with Samantha Markle during those days also. Skippy has had many blogs. This blog was also lost and so much of the archives are gone but data lives on. Danja Zone also had a fire. Interesting to note. Same time period. After there were reports of Scoobie saying he too had to call police over fire threats.

Danja Zone Fire:

Former Markle Aid: Reported

Thompson Family Fire: Reported

Page 2

Scoobie Fire: Reported

Real threat or mock victims and mislead Police ?

I am always skeptical due to this Police report that sparked PH announcement of need for safety. Skippy's blog had great posts from that time. I think they were on the old blog that is no longer. Below is a quick link to a report. I do not get paid to post links. I only research:

Good news, all were reported to Police.

There are some very interesting photos and videos that exist. Especially with time likes with Boston Baseball and The Bench and Pearl. My gawd is it like a black mirror episode.

I have been trying to learn how to rip them and post to Tumblr. I am not alone. I have help and they are going to help put something visual together matching time lines. I will post more links at that time.

www.facebook.com/TheBeInspiredCampaign

From where I stand, I believe Angelina was the lure but the backers did not anticipate her finding her family and returning home. I also doubt the backers knew her Thompson connection as it was only recently added to the public domine. Her story alone is an unbelievable true story from what I have read into. Markles reported story about the passport being held and 'family' she never had and 'kindness' campaign is a rip off persona of this person JMO. Markle is also almost a decade older and Lauren Foster report only surfaced way after Angelina reported and found family.

Timeline narrows the maths to 2008-2009.

Why is 2009 important?

Before VG's first case

www.insider.com/virginia-roberts-sexual-assault-claims-prince-andrew-timeline-2021-8

and way before Markle and Foster's reports which were most likely put there as a decoy to layer on misleading info from the truth. I believe this because again, they did not match the report timeline.

Zooming out of the equation and parachuting in, AB reported PA and PH in 2008 yet then the public reads PA action taking place in 2015 with VG right before RMM in 2016. This means the BRF were being sucker punched with BLM, PA , PH , Brexit, Megxit PP all lined up on like dominos or lame donkey kick. So the question is who paid for the PR post about Foster? One could argue multiple people must have been approached. If that were true, Bentivegna would not have reported in 2008 and again after once spotted Fosters report and taken to social media with an open post now made private.

New reports were made and we received the Anon tip through Skippy's blog and mentioned by Julie a few days ago. Sandie and Political Anon are great resources for the Politics and connections to people like Sorros. The only political contribution that I can confirm through Google is Nina Schick connected to Soho and recent UK politic link. I was also able to confirm Alyssa Pallet through LinkedIn doing some woke project about 'Government of Scotland'. Again, open source. The reblogs about this are on this blog or maybe Sandies, Anons?

Now we know how Clooney's fit re: Jal connection.

The maths would then lead me to believe the timeline reblogged about Tom Bowers book is correct. He is a great investigator. He pin pointed Canada being the place and the time before Harry. Video of the interview linked below.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dC4eQJsGJY

This would be the same time line of Emmanuel, Markle, Angelina.

Markle would have dumped Trevor after meeting Emmanuel judging by the dates worked as a 'Artist Ambassador' from the scrubbed World Vision Page which rebrands them, again, secretly, under new time lines. ( I am at my limit for posting links ).

This would be Soho Toronto Markus time and the whole meeting of the Canadian crew which set the stage for Cory and Bobs your uncle. Spectating based on timelines here as nothing is coincidence. I can do a deep dive at another time if you like.

A recap of timeline since Trevor as 'reported'.

://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1228391/meghan-markle-news-prince-harry-trevor-engelson-divorce-split-spt

This Wedding was the one where Markle wore Kate replica's.

I could be mistaken. That photo was rebloged on Skippy's.

( I try to give credit where and when possible )

Here is a similar comparison:

www.cosmopolitan.com/style-beauty/fashion/a19695804/meghan-markle-wedding-dress-differences

I have always been on the fence about Trevor for nit pick reasons such as 2011-2013 timeline? Connected Markle and 'leveled up'. The mail back of the ring was very dramatic and I spectated that it revealed a try to look independent and a woman in charge but to me, Trevor was giving signals from the side lines. Such as 'Ford' ( baby name reported to be a favorite in their relationship) and the cartier. Can not pot my finger on it. Something is just off. I hope I am wrong. as many men have been associated with Markle over the years. Again, Skippy's blog had the best Anon contributes and most of the reblogs are no longer on this blog. Below is the best quick grab

FYI lot's of my research comes from Reddit gems and deep dives:

Then we have the aftermath that moves very quicky.

Remember, in this, this narrative of Mr. Markle was being had.

Again the dates: 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016

Angelina was reportedly working as a fundraising campaign manager in Toronto, Miss Universe Delegate and spotted on social media with Emmanuel Jal, MeToo activist ( alleged abused by a well known celebrity and reported sex trafficking recruiting on a Hollywood movie production). Allegedly reported witnessed entrapment of two Royals, the domestic abuse of a celebrity's now ex wife. Can bee seen background acting on Suits, Handmaids Tale? The next James Bond? Spectating, JMO.

Source, IMDB, LinkedIn, Open source, Google Search.

I could keep going but this is enough to chew on.

Write me questions, we will fact check.

Thousands of hours went into this.

Take away, make of it what you will.

These are reblogs, speculations and opinions.

I don't believe in coincidence.

I do believe in critical thinking.

Pulling the threads of time together.

Disclaimer:

Sugars, if you are reading, Angelina is reportedly married IMDB.

No one is trying to snag Harry or whatever.

These are just dots linked to timelines to some known reports.

Long Short:

Thank you for reading!

A.P Thompson also known as Angelina Bentivegna

A former missing 'missing' person info Twitter, IMDB, Facebook

They identify as a gonzo journalist and have a performer history.

No knowledge of relation to H.S Thompson also gonzo journalist.

Wait. Didn't Johnny Depp play H.S Thompson? Woah.

According to LinkedIn has aided Intelligence Communities in past.

Connection to Markle via Emmanuel Jal

Connection to Prince Harry via loyalty to Royal Family, ROM

Was approached about the Sussex title and PH in 2008.

IMDB proves Soho UK and article is from 2008 giving timeline.

26 notes · View notes

incorrectcommunication · 1 year

Text

Gorimi, to Najimi: If the thought of something makes you giggle for longer than 15 seconds, you are to assume you’re not allowed to do it.

(Source: Skippy’s List)

#gorimi senpai #(the one from the library)#osana najimi #incorrect quotes #komi san can't communicate #incorrect komi quotes #the original quote was in first person instead of second but it works better this way

14 notes · View notes

theshadiertwin · 2 years

Text

Whats the weirdest source you have for a song you like? For example, I first heard Raspberry Beret after seeing it mentioned on the Skippy List

0 notes

incorrectredwallquotes · 2 years

Quote

Two snack limit does not mean first and last. Two snack limit does not mean two kinds of snacks. Two snack limit does not mean the snacks can be as large as you like.

Sagax to Scarum

#source: skippys list #redwall #triss #sagax #scarum #brian jacques #submission

20 notes · View notes

incorrect-stickmin · 4 years

Text

Henry: Rule 87. If the thought of something makes me giggle for longer than 15 seconds, I am to assume that I am not allowed to do it.

#henry stickmin #source: skippy's list

94 notes · View notes

incorrect-hs-quotes · 25 days

Text

GRANDPA, explaining lab rules to MOM: Two drink limit does not mean first and last. Two drink limit does not mean two kinds of drinks. Two drink limit does not mean the drinks can be as large as you like. "No drinking of alcoholic beverages" does not imply that a jack daniels iv is acceptable.

MOM: :(

#submission #source: skippy’s list #and then she starts drinking the chemicals instead.#mission failed! we’ll get em next time.#homestuck #incorrect homestuck quotes #grandpa harley #mom lalonde #mod john

65 notes · View notes

incorrect-bemorechill-quote-blog · 7 years

Conversation

The SQUIP: Now, what did we say you're no longer allowed to do?

Rich: (sighing) I'm "not allowed to attempt to appeal to mankind's baser instincts in recruitment for the SQUIP".

#source: skippy's list #rich goranski #the squip #be more chill #Be more chill musical #incorrect quotes

866 notes · View notes

sassyfrassboss · 3 years

Note

Hi Sassy- since we’re going down memory lane, I actually came to this tumblr world from an entirely different angle from the royal watching one.

I am a former journalist. In 2017 I had been researching the NIXVM cult and the Bronfman family. The connections in the Canadian political, business and entertainment world were deep- especially in Toronto. I came across MM’s name. I vaguely remembered she was that actress who was dating the younger, scruffy prince who always looked hung over.

It stood out to me that for a seemingly inconsequential, small time actress she sure intersected with a lot of prominent people: at the White House with Obama, dating (or whatever you want to call it) Ratner and Mnuchin, besties with Roth- whose family is hard wired into U.S. entertainment and politics, globe trotting with Anderson- Burkle’s magic man for Soho house internationally, running buddies with the daughter-in-law of former Canadian PM, and on and on. The more I researched her, the more I concluded something is not right here.

I stumbled upon this sub-tumblr world focused on Markle and how horrible she was. I poked through Skippy (the first version and subsequent ones), the New York Anon, TCD, Plant, the London Scoop era, and many who have come and gone. I didn’t care about the royal aspect- but I found that many in this space were thorough and detailed in their postings- many over the years have been proven correct.

I created an account and began posting some of my findings- I always cited my source material and provided direct links to documents, court records, etc. the connections between Burkle, Wexner, Roth, Bronfmans, Mulroney, Emanuels, Geffen, Oprah, Obamas and Clinton and others were very clear. I don’t mean in a conspiracy theory way, but in a formed companies and business deal way. Always scratching backs, always covering for each other. Somehow, MM intersected with many back then and even more of them now.

Concurrently, Julie Brown was working on her Epstein coverage that was published in the Miami Herald. Her research is impeccable and she has spent much of the past 15 years focused on Epstein. The overlap in NIXVM, Epstein and many of these political/entertainment/business world people listed above -and now royal is astounding.

I know some people screech that it’s not fair that PA is singled out and where are the other names? Many people-leaders of industries and countries have paid a lot of money to ensure they will never be named. But, be patient. Some identities will emerge with Maxwell’s upcoming trial. But I digress.

To be clear, I am not saying all of the people above are directly connected to the abuse of the girls and young women perpetrated by Epstein or NIXVM, but the inter connectivity between all of these unsavory people is well documented. And, MM is always on the fringe. Always. Why?

I really didn’t take her as a serious contender for Harry’s wife. I thought surely the BRF would never let that happen. Given what I had researched (pre-internet scrub) I was certain the BRF had access to much more and would shut it down. I was stunned when the marriage went through.

I still don’t care about what she wore, who she made cry or any of that. I’m not a Stan of anyone in particular but admire and respect what W&C have accomplished.

I shut down that old blog (which was under a pseudonym) a few years ago after some people’s “people” involved in this whole deal contacted me in my real, professional life expressing displeasure with my posts. That was spooky. I didn’t ask how they found me. Nothing is really anonymous.

Anyway, as a non-royal watcher, I still come on tumblr to see what you all have to say. I believe you have become p.r. savvy and many of you have great insights- especially those of you who have observed and posted since the old days. It will be fascinating to see how this all shakes out. ✌️

The Sussex Squad really did some research a few years ago and doxxed so many people. I had jumped off right before that happened so I think I was spared luckily.

There were a lot of connections between all of these people that in the beginning, the conspiracy theories of Meghan having a backer to bring down the BRF were 100% believable.

I agree that I never thought the BRF would allow the marriage. Everything about Meghan seemed shady and you could never get a clear idea of who she was. The SOHO house connection along with so many others were huge red flags. I looked into a lot of these connections myself and was astounded but what I found. Kind of went down a rabbit hole there for a while haha!

Thank you for this!

101 notes · View notes

skippyv20 · 2 years

Text

Skippy, I always thought that the BRF “damaging” PRs leaked since Meghan’s arrival, especially the current ones, are orchestrated by them both. Passed through the press as “the source” via Sunshine S. Be it Andrew & PC’s friendships with the Pedos, their shady deals, Or the Cambridges’. The pattern is it's whenever they need a PR push damage control or simply being badass. This is how Sunshine S works with clients. Aggression, blackmail, manipulation, bullying. In short, emotional and ethical blackmail until their target gives in or they get what they want. And you're correct, the Markles are with Meghan, too. They might have issues as a family but they come to a business compromise. It's all money for them. Noticed how Samantha is quiet again after “suing” Meghan? Doria is not cunning for keeping quiet, her role is simply to lay low and manage their care facility business without anybody’s snooping for worms. bad for the business. Imagine this, why do a Z-list actress can afford a “power” agent and attorney if they can't even give her big roles or connect her to Hollywood big wigs? Their partnership and plans must be beyond Hollywood. Her aim is not to become an Oscar star but to use the connection and be a household name.

This has all been about taking the monarchy down…and her aspirations to be president….sad to say..but I do believe that…if the BRF let this trash in….what is to stop her from getting into the White House. Her getting in is so unreal….it shows anything is possible….sickening I know…❤️❤️❤️❤️

#submission

12 notes · View notes

daggerlove · 2 years

Note

I saw your post on twitter about Tom's IMDb episodic listing, went to check it myself and sure enough it's real. Idk how to feel about this. What is your opinion? Do you lean towards it being real or not?

Under read more because I tend to ramble a lot apparently haha

I think it's way too early to tell tbh.

Imdb is sometimes a great source of info and had during the filming of season 1 provided us with many clues or straight up leaks.

However, I haven't seen anything like this during season 1 (and I kept my eyes glued to that page). Sometimes, when actors or even agents add their client's credits they incorrectly list them for all 6 episodes (as it happened with REG and Erika Coleman for example) or just one (for example, Evan Peters' listing on Imdb for Wandavision) and their credits get updated as the show progresses.

When they announce a new season it's pretty common for the cast & crew to be majorly listed for only the first episode at first. It's what's happening with Season 2 of Loki right now. But as the preproduction and production progresses they kind of update their listing of the cast & crew and up their involvement with the show.

That's what happened with Tom for season 2. A few days ago he had still been listed to appear only in pilot episode of the second season. But that's changed now and his credits had been updated. But the funny thing is, that whoever edited his acting credits for season 2, didn't list him for the entire season. They listed him for ep.1, 3, 5, and of course, the finale.

And like...that's the oddest thing I've seen on Imdb in a while because one would assume someone would just list him for every episode since he's playing the titular character, right? But they kinda 'forgot' to list him for two episodes lol.

And the funny thing is, it kinda follows that 'skippy' pattern. Obviously he's in the pilot of S2, that's a given. But then he's not listed for episode 2. Suddenly he's listed for episode 3. And then he's being skipped again. And then of course he's listed to appear in episode 5 and the finale, because there's no way the titular character wouldn't appear in the finale.

So what I'm saying is, there's a pattern.

1. appears 2. doesn't appear 3. appears 4. doesn't appear 5. appears 6. appears

and it's the weirdest, oddest, but funniest thing. Because whoever listed him, intentionally didn't list him for two episodes. And quite smartly too since IF Tom, hypothetically, didn't appear in any of the episodes of the season, I'd say episode 2,3 and 4 would be the only and most likely candidates. Because as a lead, he's pretty much guaranteed to appear in the pilot, penultimate (this one perhaps not as necessarily but still more likely than 2-4) and final episodes of the show/season.

They recently did something very similar with Boba Fett.

So I was thinking. IF there's any truth to this, perhaps this means we will see two different stories and povs at first; maybe the season starts with the episode that focuses on Loki (mirroring S1) and how he deals with the aftermath of the finale, if he escapes the TVA, and sets off to find Sylvie. Then maybe episode 2 is happening at the same time as episode 1 and we see Sylvie's side of the story, how she deals with the aftermath of season 1's finale, and if she also sets off to find Loki, fix the multiverse. And then we return to an episode focused on Loki again, and then we're back to Sylvie.

Basically the first four episodes are spent alternating between two different stories. Loki and Sylvie's and their separate journey to find each other again. Because Tom even teased Loki won't stop searching for Sylvie. And maybe that way we get to see even more of Sylvie's backstory that the creators teased Elissa had written for her. It'd be fun!

And then perhaps they reunite at the end of episode 4, beginning of 5 when things start really heating up again, and while I love the idea of them reuniting very soon, in episode 2 for example, I think this episodes-long pining, their separate travels to find each other again would only make their reunion that more satisfying and amazing.

And I obviously love Tom and Loki and I can never get enough of him, but maybe if he steps back in a few episodes, that gives other less fleshed out characters the chance to get their fair share of screentime to be explored more. We have Ravonna who needs to be fleshed out more. We have Sylvie. We have He Who Remains, B-15, hell, even Mobius.

I don't know if this is real. Chances are, it's not, but if it is, I honestly wouldn't mind it.

That being said, on the off chance that this is actually real I'm just going to stock up on popcorn bc, oh boy will this cause a meltdown.

#let's just keep an eye on this #for the next few weeks #or months #loki series #ask

10 notes · View notes