@raventhekittycat
hi okay so I've been mulling this one over for the past day or two and I think I have the answer. not to be using hamburger to explain anything to an american but you're my detco mutual so I'm going to try and explain it in detco terms
There's a post going around recently about how if you've read detco and only detco, the first time hakuba shows up you're going to be totally flummoxed, because damn this guy is clearly important, he gets to be even cooler than Shinichi, he's got a half-page shot of him (in such a panel-dense series such as Detective Conan, no less!!) and he's got a fucking hawk. he's CLEARLY important. everything about the narrative is indicating that you need to PAY ATTENTION to hakuba and that he's the coolest guy and he's important!!!! and then he dies in the case lol (not for real. but still.)!! and you're like huh??? what was that. why did aoyama do that.
But with the context of magic kaito this totally makes sense. He's a beloved character that people have been waiting decades to see again. Of course Aoyama is going to hype him up!! It's his big moment after years of being locked in the backrooms!!!
Anyways reading birdmen for me was kind of like that. The author's previous series, Kekkaishi, was pretty one-dimensional at the beginning, and even after the main plot started picking up at around volume 6, it still felt quite understandable. I knew what she was trying to get at, and the spectacular job she did with the anthropocene and climate change metaphor towards the end of that series really made me interested in the rest of her works. That and the way she writes familial relationships is absolutely DEVASTATING. (I mean this with the highest of praise)
But when I read BIRDMEN for the first time, I was probably in... middle school, maybe? And I read it, sure, but I didn't get it. I could see what was literally happening on the page but the narrative choices were absolutely baffling at times. Why skip over the entire part of the plot where they figure out who the birdman that saved them was? She blatantly doesn't care about that. What does she care about then?? I knew I didn't get it, I knew there were parts of it that were important and I couldn't figure out why and THAT'S how it dug its pretty little claws into me. Even after I finished catching up it nagged at me a little bit, not often at all, but enough that every once in a while I go, huh, right, that was a thing, let me go read it again.
For the record this type of story haunting has happened to me twice. First time was the Heart of Thomas, second time was BIRDMEN. I think the thing is that these are both stories which are not what other people say they are and I think I came into both of these stories with a misconception, trying to look too hard for things that weren't important and therefore missing the things that were.
Because sure, BIRDMEN is about mental illness. Yeah, it's about an evil scientific organization growing mutants in a lab. Yeah, it's about what it means to leave your humanity behind. That's all technically correct, on a surface level, and the fandom at large likely agrees with these takes for the most part, but in my opinion none of that really delves into what the thematic messaging of the story is about.
There are cryptic conversations about authority and human extinction and peculiar outfit and ability choices. You can tell these choices weren't made to serve the purpose of "writing exciting shonen manga" because that was what she did for the most part in Kekkaishi and you can tell she wasn't putting her whole pussy into doing that here. So what was she doing? What's like. All of this. Waves my hands at this.
The short answer is that it's really about the interplay between capitalism (represented by humanity) and communism (represented by birdmen), and explores the role institutional white supremacy (EDEN) plays in enforcing capitalism. It is ALSO about queer liberation and the importance of community, but hey, that double-stacks conveniently with the communism metaphor.
But also take this opinion of mine with a grain of salt. As far as I know I'm the only one who really truly deeply believes that it is not only AN interpretation of the work, but one that was fully intended by the author.
So basically, I like it, because I think it says something true and beautiful that I also believe in, even if I didn't have the words for it the first time I read it. But I don't really think that's what people really look for in a media recommendation.
Do I like it? Yes, I love it. Will I recommend it to others? Yeah, sure. But do I think it's deeply flawed? Yeah, absolutely. It's flawed in the same ways as The Witch from Mercury— a rushed ending, too many threads that were opened and never tied together. The pacing and characterization is perfect in the beginning, and too rushed at the end. There are prerequisites you basically HAVE to read in order to understand the story (tempest for G-Witch and the communist manifesto for birdmen). I think a truly good story wouldn't have any of these things so if people don't like it I never blame them.
It's my personal experiences that make birdmen so profound to me. If you are not queer I just don't think Eishi coming out as a birdman to his mom will hit the same, just as an example. Sorry that I wasn't the kid you wanted me to be. I know you love me and you just want the best for me and that's why you're so controlling, because you think I can be saved by conforming to societal expectations. But I can't live like that. I can't be like that. And that's why I must go. etc.
Aesthetically I do love birdmen a lot. If I had to describe it in a few words it would probably be "chilling", "beautiful", and "powerful", which nicely coincides with the type of things I personally like to draw. It's also silly to a small degree but it's so serious and I know Tanabe can be way way way funnier (read kekkaishi for this. kekkaishi and hanazakari no kimitachi he were foundational to my sense of sequential art humor) so that's not really the standout trait of this series.
I can't let it go because I'm chewing this series like a bone. And it's taking me years but I am getting that sweet sweet marrow. By god. We are on year 3 of this shit and I am GOING to understand this series. and I'm going to make 3 video essays about it
10 notes
·
View notes
Whumpers, what are your earliest memories?
Mine is from when I was about two or three. I was in a stroller, at my cousin’s Irish dancing recital. After the recital, my aunts were talking down to me in the stroller, and to each other. I was experiencing extreme anxiety because I couldn’t understand what they were saying, when I felt I should have been able to communicate with them like they were communicating with each other. I was also very tired and dazed. I did not cry though… I probably looked normal on the outside.
I also remember when I was about four or five, I went to the beach with my dad and one of his friends. I somehow found my way onto the dock, planted my little rear end on a jet ski, untethered it from the dock, and started floating into the sunset. There was an old lady lounging in a donut inflatable out some way; she said something to me, but I couldn’t understand what she said, despite trying really hard. I’m assuming it was something along the lines of “Oh my god get off that jet ski you’re going to fucking DIE, kid,” but again… couldn’t understand a word of what she said, and got frustrated because she was speaking English (without an accent) and I should know how to understand adults speaking English to me.
At this point, my dad is yelling at me from across the water, and a young lifeguard drags the jet ski back. On land, my dad lectured at me very harshly as he led me back to the car. I didn’t know I had done anything wrong, and was very confused. At some point this guy starts quoting the Bible at me, and the only thing I could pick out were the words (spoken very emphatically), “Your days are numbered.”
“My days are numbered?” cue a vivid mental image of a calendar, with dates listed for every day of the week, “What does that mean?” Later on I figured out this was the Bible’s way of referencing death at God’s hand which just made me even more confused as to what I did, until at age thirteen, I figured out, “Oh a baby who can’t swim floating on a jet ski is terrifying, actually.”
Tagging: @kaleidoscopr @redd956 @hereissomething @astudyinpanda @c0ldbrains @straight-to-the-pain
13 notes
·
View notes
happy wincest wednesday, Z! i know you have a special fondness for s9... as someone who has zero memory of that season and is only up to mid-s3 on a slow rewatch, i need some incentives to make it that far. what, particularly, do you like about that season and why do wincesties need to appreciate it more?
do you see it as being more ripe for a first time or established relationship?
it's wincest thursday because sometimes you're in a bummer mood all day on wincest wednesday but you save up the wincest to make the next day better. yes? yes.
I do have a special fondness for s9! It's terrible and wonderful, haha. I remember a lot of people getting bigmad shitfit pissy about it at the time -- o the factions that erupted! o the people who abruptly revealed somewhat scary levels of polarization! (o the terrifying weird accusations of abuse apologism, and worse!) -- but at the time I was pure Switzerland, and I think that's the best way to be. I really liked Carver's understanding of The Marriage -- I mean, he literally ended the previous season in a church! -- and I was like, okay, this is painful for now but where will it go? Sam and Dean obviously weren't going to 'break up' in any kind of permanent way, because every showrunner has understood that the show is at its best when they're together. So, how will they get back together? What will it take for them to get there?
When you're on team "the actual plot of Supernatural is the relationship between Sam and Dean," everything just gets better, I think. Who cares if there's, whatever, angel wars or something happening in the background? The part that matters is the space between two brothers. s1-5, to me, is the story of how they actually get to know each other, how they learn to trust each other, how they grow up. (They're SO YOUNG in s1! It's appalling,) In s6 and s7 it's like, wow, okay, so we're actually choosing to stay together. Sure, there's a world-ending plot again -- when isn't there! -- but we're actually deciding that we want to do this more than we want to have normal lives. That's wild.
The Carver seasons, then, are all about the marriage. s8 is, "wow, we cheated on each other. ...We don't actually want to do that, do we? We want to actually devote ourselves to each other. Weird!" So they make a promise, in a church. (!!!) And then, because this is Supernatural and you can't get a single goddamn day off, IMMEDIATELY on the heels of Dean promising that he'd do anything for Sam, Sam's life is put in danger. So s9 becomes about, okay, you made a promise. So, immediately the question becomes: what will you do to keep it?
I know it's not 'nice' but I really don't get how so many fans are, like, mad about it. So much great storytelling happens when a character says "I have this line and I cannot cross it" and then they're put in a situation where the best possible option is to cross that line. That shit is the best. Dean wants and needs Sam to live for both their sakes (any reduction of that moment to 'selfishness' is rank stupidity and I won't countenance it); he won't put anything before Sam; so, what will he do? What will it do to him, to have done that thing? What will Sam say when he finally realizes? What will Sam do when he realizes he'd do the exact goddamn thing?
It's even better in context:
s8: are we married? it turns out that, shit, yes we are.
s9: okay, prove it. <-- we are here
s10: okay, prove it again.
s11: wow, well. We really are just like this, aren't we. Let's decide to be okay with that.
I just love that kind of writing.
PLUS OH MY GOD ALL THOSE RAD MOMENTS WHERE DEAN WANTED TO TELL SAM AND GADREEL WAS HOLDING SAM HOSTAGE OVER THE EDGE OF A CLIFF AAAAA basically I just like a good dose of Dean torture, what can I say.
Oh -- and on that, I like it best with established relationship but I like everything better with established relationship. But in the same way that I love proving things -- I don't think their relationship means nearly as much until they get through all this stuff to s11. Love declarations in s1 are like... k. Talk to me when you've been through literal hell.
47 notes
·
View notes