Tumgik
#Hawkeye/trapper
ichayalovesyou · 14 days
Text
Why Do Old-School TV Duos Have SUCH MLM Vibes?!
I think there’s something very specific about the formula and writing style of non-serialized/semi-serialized shows from the 60s to 80s that featured two grown men going on wacky dangerous adventures that makes my gay little literary analysis brain go absolutely off the wall bonkers. I’m trying to figure out why!
Tumblr media
I’m writing this on my Trek blog because I don’t think this pattern in people actually shipping these types of relationships the way they do if fandom as we know it wasn’t born via TOS in syndication. That being said! I also think it has to do with the way these shows are designed that makes myself and others OBSESSED with a specific character dynamic that feels (to me) damn near impossible to replicate in modern television. In a way that’s more than just fandom, it’s in the way TV like this was written at the time!
Further explanation under the cut!
🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈
I think what it usually boils down to is this. There’s a charming protagonist whom without the series could not operate, frequently top billed or the title character! (See: Wild Wild West, Starsky & Hutch) BUT he doesn’t have anyone to play off of! So what do they do pretty much every single time? Give Mr. Idealized Vision of Time-Period Masculinity For Genre a second guy to rhyme with!
See but the other guy has to play opposite but parallel to our hypermasculine protagonist. So what frequently ends up happening is that in order to play off our “normal” guy, even though he’s also a white dude, is that he’s still somehow Other.
They’re always perfect for each other, and they always get into scenarios that would be written, shot and interpreted by conventional audiences as romantic IF either one of those characters were a woman! Especially at the time these shows were made in.
Tumblr media
If the one is aggressive, the other is gentle. If the protagonist is violent, his counterpart is intellectual. If the one is stoic, the other is emotional. Which (while one size def doesn’t fit all) usually makes the second guy come off as much more queer-coded (and sometimes other minorities like neurodivergent/disabled etc) than the other because of the traits associated with masculinity vs gayness at the time! Our prime examples in these gifs are Spock, Hutch, Artemus, and also *BJ!
*(M*A*S*H is a bit of a unique case since the show flirts with queerness more openly in ways that people more into the series have explained better than me but I think it still fits the formula I’m discussing.)
Here’s the thing though right? We’ve got two best friends, and the show NEVER really feels right if one of them is missing unless the focus of the story is how A & B operate without each other while trying to find the other one. They stick with and rescue each other unfailingly in scenarios that might destroy a regular friendship.
Hell, there’s often stuff that would emotionally/physically destroy a regular person/character in modern media. But because it’s not serialized they always seem to pull through seemingly through the power of friendship alone or dealing with it off-screen! Emotional consequences? Yuck! (Unless it’s M*A*S*H or Starsky & Hutch, like I said, not monolithic)
Tumblr media
Here’s the thing that some people might say throws a wrench into the interpretation I’m discussing. What about the absolutely non-stop parade of conventionally attractive women the main protagonist (and less frequently the supporting man) goes through?
I would reply: how many of those female characters actually emotionally impact our protagonists as characters long term?
The answer is of course, because it’s NOT serialized, almost none! Kirk can watch Edith Keeler get killed by a car accident and still be making eyes at Spock the next episode. Hawkeye can have a “life changing” romance with a Vietnamese humanitarian woman, then share a blanket with BJ next episode like she never existed!
The Doylist explanation of course is not just the fact it wasn’t serialized but also just, constant, blatant 20th century sexism. Which SUCKS!!! As well as not wanting a long term love interest to throw off the character dynamic of our duderagonists. It’s the 20th century tv equivalent of bros before hoes.
However the Watsonian explanation always seems to result in no love interest EVER being more important than what the two protagonists have no matter whether you think they’re queer or not. No attractive woman could make our reputed babe-hound protagonist abandon his buddy. There’s no earnest romance our more queer-coded supporting man doesn’t end (or get ended for him) often for the protagonist’s sake.
Now some of these women are incredibly well written and straight up GOOD matches for our guys. So why wouldn’t they get involved in something long term UNLESS!! They were in love with each other the WHOLE time?
What if protagonist (frequently the babe hound) doesnt know he’s queer, or knows but doesn’t know he’s in love with his bestie, or any number of similar fruity explanations? The supporting man also runs into this explanation but people tend to believe he’s already aware that he’s queer but either also doesn’t know he’s in love or is keeping it to himself because time-period homophobia and/or thinking (probably not unreasonably) that babe hound is straight?
Between the inherent closeness of being narrative foils. The regularly scheduled life or death drama creating sometimes insanely romantic (in the narrative if not a literal sense) drama between the two. The revolving door of weekly women they never seem to get attached to enough to leave one another. The non-serialized nature resulting in sparse personal information/history about the protagonists as a result.
I think between the very NATURE of the way tv shows were written at the time. Plus the way fandom was shaped by a dynamic that has rippled through how media works and is interpreted by fans for decades upon decades. It’s not hard to imagine getting really emotionally invested in the possibility of the protagonists being in love is a fantastic way to enjoy the media!
Tumblr media
In conclusion, it’s really fun and easy to go “these bitches gay! Good for them good for them!”
119 notes · View notes
variousqueerthings · 2 years
Text
I FORGOT TO ADD FROM FIVE O’CLOCK CHARLIE THAT TRAPPER AND HAWKEYE SHARE THE SAME MARTINI DRINKING TUBE WHILE IN THE SHOWER!!!! THAT’S SOME HAYES CODE CONTENT BABEY!!!!!!
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
don’t you love it when two guys suck on things in the shower together
199 notes · View notes
louisironson · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
happy "is it tuesday or wednesday?" friday
17K notes · View notes
odyvera · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
this sequence could easily be a scene from the show and I'd be none the wiser
10K notes · View notes
trapperjohn · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
1K notes · View notes
bisexualdawnsummers · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
1K notes · View notes
stars-bean · 10 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
M*A*S*H | 2.08 - "The Trial of Henry Blake"
574 notes · View notes
hawkeyeslaughter · 6 months
Text
hey , don’t cry . 256 episodes of mash to watch . many enjoyable . all with hawkeye . okay ?
1K notes · View notes
xavier616 · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
"Why don't you answer his question?"
The incubator || Episode Twelve || Season Two
665 notes · View notes
radarsmenagerie · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
mashgender pt. 2
866 notes · View notes
loopnoid · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
more mash nonsense i've been accumulating. yes i can draw things that are not bj and hawkeye sometimes. that being said nsfw(?) beejhawk under the cut
Tumblr media
942 notes · View notes
chipadequeso · 20 days
Text
Tumblr media
raaadaaarrrrr. radar wake up its 3:29 am. can yuo call the president of france.we have something to say to him. While youre at it we have this great idea for a prank can you get us some flammable liquids for it. dont worry about it
578 notes · View notes
variousqueerthings · 2 years
Text
I have a playlist called “Queers at War” that I made a couple of years ago for writing reasons, and I was listening to it today and not to be really edgy and emotional about Hawkeye and Trapper but:
All I want is nothing more To hear you knocking at my door 'Cause if I could see your face once more I could die a happy man I'm sure
When you said your last goodbye I died a little bit inside I lay in tears in bed all night Alone without you by my side
But if you loved me Why did you leave me
Take my body Take my body All I want is All I need is To find somebody I'll find somebody
'Cause you brought out the best of me A part of me I'd never seen You took my soul wiped it clean Our love was made for movie screens
Ooh, if you loved me Why did you leave me Take my body Take my body All I want is All I need is To find somebody I'll find somebody
Like you
4 notes · View notes
coffeeandacig · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
All Credits to historic_imagery
653 notes · View notes
skltart · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
bathrobe colours <3
693 notes · View notes
transjudas · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
If I thought I could stop it just by going to sleep, don't you think I'd try?
816 notes · View notes