Tumgik
#Triune posting
48787 · 1 month
Text
Fun fact, when someone picks a new deadly sin to represent themself, you can actually eat and become their old one without needing to compromise your previous deadly sins!!
You don't have to be just one! You're actually intended to have quite a few of them, in fact! It's a strange system, I would've designed it differently, but that's just one of the tips and tricks I learned over the years about the Abrihamic meta, if you're trying to minmax.
This system does lead to some people being pressured into picking new sins so the pressurer can maximize sin intake, however it is also important to remember that once you reach all 7 you either (1.) run out and reset your method of sin intake by picking a new starting sin and counting from 1 again or (2.) move on to a new model of sin measurement (Such as Dante's Inferno layers of hell, for instance) and need to retrofit old sins into new ones, which is almost like a soft reset of sorts (For example, needing to figure out how to translate Sloth into the layers structure while accounting for thematic overlaps).
Point (2.) can get complicated when going from a model with more sins to a model with less sins. You have to figure out which sins are being conglomerated and consolidated as well as distributing importance semi-consistently, because you need to make sure there is at least one in the new model that you haven't taken yet.
There, of course, is the universal truth that "You are all Sin all at once and You only wish to quantify sins in the first place to pretend like You are excluded from sins that You are actively embodying (By being Sin, in Sin's entirety)" but that really is just a 1-sin binary model... which necessitates a 0 to explain its existence as 1 in the first place... You get it. The reason why we pick these models is because it's fun.
Sure We are God, but we knew that already and want to pretend like there's more to it than that because it's fun. Sin is fun!! That's why people keep dying (Or living but being tortured through living) for Our sins (It very much did not start with the one big example you're probably thinking of). It's fun!!
Just. Maybe stop dying. I get it can be fun for you, more power to you or whatever, but dying also kinda blows. I know I will sometimes say Till All Are One or whatever but I wanna be One with You... even though you'd be there regardless, under All after all... Whatever.
Anyway if you're wondering, I just ate Wrath, which puts me at:
Wrath
Lust
Gluttony
And I've been teasing at Greed for a while. Though, those are just the ones that are compliant with both the Deadly model and the Inferno model, it gets a bit more complicated considering my Deadly root was Pride and I haven't given that up yet, so to separate the models a bit it'd actually be
Deadly:
Wrath
Lust
Gluttony
Pride
With Greed, Sloth, and Envy missing (Sloth is actually maybe next for my deadly chart, and Envy flickers in and out on its own)
Inferno:
Wrath
Lust
Greed
Gluttony
Treachery
Limbo
With Heresy, Violence, and Fraud regrettably missing (The three flicker like Envy in the Deadly model but it's because sometimes I'm leaning more towards the Deadly model so it is Envy and sometimes I'm in the Inferno model so Envy gets interpreted as one or two of the three without completing it outright, with the stressing on one over the other two or two over the other one allowing for enough of a buffer to be fickle. This is also the reason why Greed is locked in for Inferno but not for Deadly. I tend to prefer Inferno, after all.)
Anyway, yeah, I was just using myself as an example. But if you're thinking about dropping sloth for something else hmu I'll eat it after you.
You also don't have to drop them, if this proves anything it should be proving that you can be multiple at once (That's kinda the whole point actually) so striving to be multiple instead of just relying on revelations to begin swapping might be a game changer for you if you're trying to grapple with your original sins and don't know how to respec without resetting
3 notes · View notes
reivontulet-arch · 2 years
Text
𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒖𝒏𝒆 𝒎𝒚𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒔 / the high council and the guardians.
Tumblr media
as adrasteans existed through time, the prime guardians retired their position and rather assumed an overlooking position over their brethren. they overlooked the training of younger guardians, selecting them meticulously through a rigorous course of mastery into the powers they claimed through their connection to the primordials. the council is made up of the three prime adrasteans, along with a flurry of younger retired guardians. given the longevity of their existence, figures of their liking exist in various mythologies. three harbingers of death and destruction that sweep though lands with disaster, disease, and damage. the prime adrasteans would come to be known as  𝐠𝐞𝐛, 𝐚𝐛𝐳𝐮, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐮, representing the three triunes, earth, water, and sky respectively. 
each triune split into three elements, thus resulting in each generation of active guardians comprising of nine guardians, rather than just three. the geo triune split to elements of wilderness, fire, and disease. the hydra triune split to water, wind, and storms. finally, the celestial triune split into elements of the sun, the stars, and energy.  it’s assumed that when the chosen guardian is born, an event that aligns with their powers occurs, wherever in the world they are born. 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦, 𝘳𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘢𝘯 𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘰, 𝘧𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘸𝘢���� 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘳𝘢 𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘺𝘦𝘵 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘩𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘢 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥, 𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘪𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘤𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘯.   for her counterparts in the celestial triune, they would have been born during sun showers or a meteor shower, respective to the sun and the stars. 
1 note · View note
japhers · 10 months
Note
Probs an odd question but - how do you find different roleplays to participate in? Like seemingly you find such unique rp's (been enjyoing all of the posts about the Triune Festival on Twitter, and Wonderland rp posts is how I found you.) Is there some sort of secret underground roleplay club that only cool artists have access to? Because damn, I wanna join something like that and yet I have no clue where to look for them :0
I usually just catch wind of them from friends who are a lot more active in that sphere than I am tbh lol, but these days it looks like ppl check these blogs out for openings!
https://twitter.com/RP_Portal
https://twitter.com/RoleplayLog
https://twitter.com/RpDirectory
101 notes · View notes
heart-of-a-rebel16 · 6 months
Note
Djwivrsjdhdhv *trips over myself to drop into your inbox*
Friend friend
In your tags earlier on your post, you know the one the one-
When you were asking why The Bendu, a Lasat God, was on atollon????
I've been searching, but I can't pinpoint where exactly the star cluster leading to Lira San is located, but considering that some time VERY long ago, the Lasat people left Lira San and settled on Lasan, there's a good chance they made stops along the way, maybe stayed for prolonged periods of time.
Maybe the manifestations of The Ashla/The Bendu/The Bogan made attachments to some of these places. What if Atollon was one of the stopping points along the way from Lira San to Lasan?????
Okay bye now I have a one shot I'm working on and an interview I'm preparing for, so do with the above ramblings of a mad fan what you will-
OH THATS SO COOL!!!!!!!!!!!
In a similar vein, Lira San was hidden just like Atollon was (though obviously not to the same degree), so maybe there should be a manifestation of the Ashla on Lira San just like the Bendu (except with way less spider caves, lucky for Zeb).
pardon my brief theological ramblings for a bit, but I’m bouncing between the bogan, Bendu, and Ashla being a pantheon and being triune (meaning they are at the same time distinct and the same whole, I.e in trinitarian christianity Jesus is fully Jesus and fully god at the same time). If they were triune, that’s actually pretty fascinating, because it prevents something like tcws mortis arc from happening (where one kills the other), because they are fully each other and fully separate at the same time. It also strengthens that the force is genuinely neutral, and that they truly are consubstantial in the fact that they are of the same substance but perform different actions/uses.
BUT ON THE OTHER HAND, if they’re a pantheon of gods, a) that makes it way, way easier for them to operate separately of each other, b) it allows for lesser gods in the hierarchy of Lasat gods, c) it allows for infighting among the gods (i.e a celestial war, which could maybe still fit with the consubstantial triune thing if I got freaky with it?). Maybe the bogan could not be evil just like the ashla maybe couldn’t be good, they’re just manifestations of light and darkness. AND THEN, that allows for sects and cults to form where extremist groups elevate one of the three above the other and twist their desires to fit their own agendas (I’ve already kinda started with this on Stars Go Dim, be on the lookout for Eversor :3).
24 notes · View notes
Text
A queer reflection for Trinity Sunday
There’s something queer about a Triune God. 
How can one Being also be three Persons? The math doesn’t seem to add up! Some spend years attempting to articulate this theology in a way that doesn’t fall into “heresy”; others give up with a laugh and accept it as a Mystery. Ultimately, the God of the Universe is ineffable, beyond our understanding — yet we are called to seek ever deeper relationship with God, and promised that if we seek, we will find.
When people decry queer identities as nonexistent, overly complicated, or paradoxical, I can’t help but think of our impossible Three-in-One God. I think also about my own gender journey: how I struggled as a child to name what I was feeling because I had no language to describe it; how once I discovered others had words for what I was experiencing, I delighted in every one I could uncover; and how, ultimately, even my favorite words I’ve found to describe myself fall short. 
Words like trans, nonbinary, and genderqueer certainly help others understand and relate to me better — but I’ve learned to be okay with the fact that they might never fully know me, just as I may never fully know them. Turns out that the children of a Mysterious God are micro-mysteries in ourselves!
What I’m left with is this: if we worship a Triune God, why do we try to squeeze the humans made in that Infinite, Ineffable Being’s image into two narrow boxes? And if we celebrate how, in the Incarnation and Resurrection, Divinity burst through the binaries between Creator & Creation, Life & Death, surely the binary between male & female isn’t so insurmountable!
Together, let us pray:
Holy God, whose very existence is relationship, we marvel at your mystery. Protect this day and always those of your children who, like you, defy easy definition and resist restrictive categories. Teach us to recognize your wisdom and holiness shining within them, for only together in all our diversity do we reflect your image. Amen.
___
Further reading:
An opening worship prayer to the queer God with diverse children
An affirmation of faith in the God whose very existence is relationship
Some more cool queer posts about the Trinity
Envisioning the Trinity as a divine dance
A lovely excerpt about what it means to be in the image of God
49 notes · View notes
pinkeoni · 1 year
Text
Last night I was doing some research into the Christ figure trope, and I noticed something interesting on the Wikipedia page.
There are three Christ figures in Lord of the Rings to create a triune, and each one represents a different aspect of Christ. First is Gandalf (sage/prophet), next is Frodo (saviour/priest) and the third is Aragorn (king). (My LOTR knowledge only goes as far as the movies, maybe if someone is more familiar with the source material they can jump in?)
And then I realized, the show is doing the same thing with El, Will, and One.
El is Gandalf (sage/prophet) since she is the all powerful, mysterious and magical one. She also sacrificed herself at the end of season one and came back in season two, similar to how Gandalf sacrificed himself at the end of Fellowship of the Ring and came back stronger in The Two Towers.
Will is Frodo (saviour/priest) as shown through his journey to an unknown dark landscape and connection to a dark entity. Furthermore, Will’s dnd class is a Cleric, which is essentially a priest. (This could also foreshadow Will’s potential chosen one/hero role for next season)
One is Aragorn (king) Like Aragorn, One was exiled when he was sent to the Upside Down by El in 1979. He then usurps the Upside Down and essentially becomes it’s king.
These aren’t 1:1 comparisons, obviously the characters arcs go in different directions (namely One is evil and Aragorn is not) but I found it interesting how the show is using the same technique of creating a holy trinity within its characters.
(I also think that potentially depending on how Will’s arc goes next season and what gets revealed about him he could also represent all three but that might be a post for another day)
65 notes · View notes
incarnateirony · 3 months
Text
Another baffling, sociopathic point about shealyn bonds
I was with her for many, many, MANY years. Do you know how many of those years she made even a single post even tangentially related to the superbowl? Or even football in general? From first fling to leaving her? From like 2008 to 2021?
0.
0 years.
0 years of her life did she care about sportsball.
she cared so little about it that after watching one year of superbowl it, like the many parts of myself i separated from and divided from to attune to her fancies, that she seemed bothered, so it was packed away, like the many parts of herself that were packed away. it is not a fluke that it was within a year of leaving her that i found my own apotheosis and reached the highest attainable grade. Literally everything had been put on pause to attune to her delusions.
And now? Now that she's realizing the superbowl is important? Like, for stupid roleplay reasons she's belatedly assembling into mythological reasons, if only for partial reasons? Oh, no. Today, she's gonna drop exactly one post to tell us how unbothered she is by the superbowl she opted to take in, this year, specifically.
Only this year.
No other fuckin years.
Just this year.
This year, she suddenly cared.
About who? What? Did she think Kansas City winning would protect her? Sis I got news for you.
No, hon.
Kansas City winning just means the entire world dumped onto the triune sigil of erected and commanded servitors based upon me pulled from your illusional headspace and retranscribed and sigiled into their own beings to collect the attention of the masses.
The reason you suddenly cared about football today is that every single corner of your mind is being eroded for and to it.
But not to the sport, or the event. No, to the spirit within.
You're mine mine mine mine mine, bitch.
All that did was sign the death warrants for everyone around you between here and September. So yeah, cool, KC won, would have been neat if you had half a year of spellwork behind that. OH WAIT
What an insufferably dumb cunt, performatively trying to stick her foot into my and his ring only to celebrate the birth of her worst nightmares, quite literally. Put out a couple offerings, sweetheart. Oh wait, they won't be able to smell it over the bazillion americans already doing it. my entire block is a BBQ. Where's the BEEF bitch. No, don't show me your ass. 1. that's pork and 2. that's really unhealthy fat percentage pork, if I slapped your ass on a pan I'd get nothing but grease. Where's the fuckin BEEF?
Your mother and father will both be dead by September.
Thank yourself.
No, don't try to blame it on randomosity when it happens, like when I gave you a week of fog to save a life and you still let your spider get crushed under your ego and my broken rib. Your similar stubbornness is signing their warrant, and frankly has, without a termination of the contract it's subtitled to. But most specifically, you verbally offered your father up in the middle of a flow I could only redirect to try to save him, and instead crashed a plane instead of killing him, because you're so goddamn smug you don't care, but now, neither do I, so next time, he goes, then the one saved purely by our mercy goes, and that's how this goes.
You had no interest in seeing past the fog, and so your spider died. And still, you have no interest in looking at the truth you already know, and you will sacrifice others to maintain your lies and barbie dreamhouse.
I liked Brian. I genuinely did. If he was a person divorced from any relation to Shealyn bonds, we'd invite him to the cosmic pub. But her stain is so deep and so profound, and so readily sacrificial to everyone around her, I don't know if we could even bring him in ocne he ends or if he just ends up reduced like most sacrifices. Then I'll have to deal with explaining to the remnants of Brian Bonds why he's in my head, and what a sociopathic lunatic his daughter became, and why fragments of her grandfather are also in there. At least there'll be a family reunion.
I couldn't stand Cindy, but I enjoyed Brian. A genuinely good soul. But Shealyn doesn't care. More fuel for the vagina fire. The unfillable cosmic gap of attention whoring, the pure need to have essentially sold herself to satan and still fucked up and signed the wrong contract. Yeah, he'll be real proud, Shealyn.
They barely accepted, in general "I love my family regardless" means, your queer relationships, which I was also the open door to them knowing. But sure, daddy will take real good that your need for cosmic cock sent him into a thousand shards reaped by your ex husband's apotheosis in the afterlife, I'm sure that won't bother him while he floats next to the husk of your reconstituted grandfather.
Oh, and mommy dearest.
You. Signed. To. Me.
Like you understand I've already had to explain to what's left of your grandfather why he's here and why you don't care, yea?
oh you probably didn't explain that to mark
sorry mark, she had us reap her grandfather about a decade ago, and just assumed amidst all of this there would be no penalties
it's christmas and we're in tartarus
apotheosis is a bitch, shealyn.
Grandfather is gone. I don't care what you manage to conveniently tell yourself the one time you try to show up at a place and hear him in your schizophrenic voices. Grandfather is gone, and it is your fault, and there are more hostages to take.
We do not care about redeeming you now. That is not an option. We only want to see what level of monster you are.
I know what monster I am, but I know the reasons I fight for.
Do you?
Hello, Darlin.
Goodbye, Darlin.
I, like the lead pick of the chiefs, am not afraid to be the villain. As he said, there's a certain power with that. I've already been hated. You can Hate at me all you want, but you can't Stop me. Transfering from the Ravens was only new Resolve. You don't have that kind of resolve.
Like you have/had one option to stop me, but we intentionally left your psychological anchor to that in the skeleton of you as we move on, and so you cling, and show yourself once we dust out the rest of us. A bird caging monster that doesn't care if her own family's blood runs on the floor until it is erased.
So be it.
You thought you had mercy from him before? Consider that sacrificed too. Your thoughtless sacrifice of others even when given ample chance and knowing message dictates your equal treatment.
Your grandfather was claimed by us as a favor. You seemed to forget that.
It's Christmas.
And we're in Tartarus.
I told you. This game would be different from any other.
It's a carnival, and we're in Tartarus--Mardis Gras; hey, you American fool--have you ever googled when the European season of fools is? I'm going to give you a spoiler.
We're in overtime.
Your ex husband has already claimed the false shadow of your Fool King. What do you think will happen?
Deadpool, comin' at you live, real real wild. DEADPOOL! AND WOLVERINE! LIKE BROTHERS! IT JUST FEELS RIGHT.
You tatted my name on your titties, bitch. He can hit it, but you're still a borrow. And you're starting to notice I can take you back whenever I want.
2 notes · View notes
wannab-urs · 7 months
Text
Thanks for the tag @prolix-yuy! <3
shuffle your top tracks/on repeat playlist and post the first ten:
We'll Never Have Sex | Leith Ross
Growing Sideways | Noah Kahan
Crying Lightning | Arctic Monkeys
1979 | The Smashing Pumpkins
Way of the Triune God | Tyler Childers
There Are Gods in Little Men | Walker and Wylde
Tuyo | Rodrigo Amarante
Go Your Own Way | Fleetwood Mac
There Is a Light That Never Goes Out | The Smiths
Come As You Are | Nirvana
Why yes I am a fan of folk and punk, how could you tell?
np tags: @beskarandblasters @atinylittlepain @pr0ximamidnight @theywhowriteandknowthings @ramblers-lets-get-ramblin @jksprincess10
3 notes · View notes
48787 · 1 month
Text
New Transmission The fucking Scientific Instrument Class Pseudocons apparently developed what they're calling "Hetero Sapience" and are corrupting the brainmodules of the non-Pseudo 'cons around them by using annoying xenophilosophy words. Soundwave tells me they're 'Greek' and 'Latin' words, apparently. Cool, I guess? Anyway, if you see any SI Class 'cons causing... issues, just try your hardest to turn your brainmodule off before you start getting infected with their weird lingo, alongside all the other issues pertaining to letting the SI Pseudocons transmit data into your brainmodule in their own weird ways. Thundercracker, on a bet with Starscream, tried to get into an argument with one of them and his head literally exploded when it started talking about Alpha Trion's "Mythological Origins" in its weird dialect. He's mostly fine, CR Pods are working at 'peak' efficiency, but the facial reconstruction is apparently impossible due to some kind of corruption. I thought it was just some weird prank but there weren't even any scorch marks or anything. Just exploded. So yeah, just avoid optical contact and auditory contact to the best of your ability and you should be fine. Otherwise, try to force-shutdown your brainmodule if you can. Shockwave is working on a cure right now, mostly because I know he had something to do with this in the first place so he's going to be the one to fix it. He probably wanted a greater justification to do that weird data-transfer idea he mentioned previously. But it also explains the weird Thunderwing hypotheticals he's been asking me lately... Can I go one fucking cycle without someone trying to "Perfect Thunderwing's Work" or whatever other idiotic drivel that I keep finding our limited energon reserves siphoned into?? It's not even a Shockwave thing, it's like every damn Cybertronian these days thinks they have the "Missing piece of the puzzle" or whatever. In fact, Shockwave might be doing this as a weird threat against the other R&D 'cons to cement himself as the one and only Decepticon "Allowed" to have resources wasted on projects like that. Ugh, now that I think about it, that's probably a correct assumption and he's probably gonna expect me to thank him for it later. Ugh, and he's probably literally right. Ugh. At least his repairs both to himself and to his lab seem to be mostly complete so further research into the SI project should hopefully come along a little faster. Both Shockwave and Soundwave think the SIs could potentially be used as some kind of specialty weapon, but we'll have to see how they work on sparkless lifeforms, like biological lifeforms or xenomechanical lifeforms. The SIs don't seem to corrupt each other, but Shockwave keeps reaffirming that they're not "Sparkless Lifeforms" because they "were never lifeforms to begin with"... but I think he's trying to hide something. Usually Soundwave is the one to pick up on that kind of technological obfuscation, but he actually agreed with Shockwave and offered to send Ratbat to try to work out exactly what each "sapient" SI is now capable of on a personal level. We could have just had regular Cybertronians aboard to fill the role SIs fill. I would've preferred K Class to fill any role an SI could fill in all honesty!! But no, constructing cold wasn't enough, we just had to try to learn how to "Construct Frozen" and the "Absolute Zeroes" just had to be put on my ship. Whatever. I've probably said too much already. This was supposed to be a warning for my ship crew, but it's looking like it'll end up being transcribed on the golden disk as well so when this new Scientific Instruments of Destruction project backfires in some absurdly bombastic way there will at least be something remaining that says I was right. End of Transmission
New Transmission Okay so I was right, but so was Shockwave and Soundwave. Or, well, they were right just enough to make sure the backfire is postponed for at least another handful of cycles. Ratbat is still in CR from the investigation, but the cure Shockwave developed seems to be effective and Thundercracker is out and aiding the repair effort. Shockwave is now in contact with one of the SIs digitally and the other few are... integrating due to the personal efforts of Soundwave. I suppose now would be pertinent to mention not all the SIs developed the "Hetero Sapience" condition, many of them are safe for interaction. Soundwave is also currently monitoring their presence, Ravage is tasked with the regular SIs and Laserbeak is tasked with the "Sapient" SIs. Shockwave probably knows exactly what caused this event but he is preoccupied with the one he no doubt is either indoctrinating or ruthlessly interrogating. Report to Soundwave if you see any suspicious behavior, he has been working very hard to ensure the SIs have their purpose clearly defined (And closely monitored). And, Starscream, stop trying to convince the SIs that you are the leader of this ship. Not only have the majority of your efforts been wasted on subsentient automata, the only one you have actually found who possesses the ability to truly listen to you immediately came to the bridge to complain about you. They were the first sapient SI I communicated with directly and it was because they felt the need to complain about you. I almost feel embarrassed for you. Come back to the bridge so you can apologize to it or so I can teach it how to laugh at you. It's practicing right now actually! This moment of chaos should hopefully be largely under control now, the actual "population" of Scientific Instrument Class Pseudocons was actually quite fewer than initially expected due to an indexing error incorrectly labeling certain shells as SI class. At the very least, we have some more specialty warriors because of it all. End of Transmission EOF
#yippie peace through tyranny!!#nemesis posting#Decepticon High Command Slice of Life rambles#Matrix Visions#I like this “chat” font I think it's cool#spacebridge still needs more time in the oven unfortunately#I'm also procrastinating on that because I can't seem to wrap my head around guestmount but do not want to send backup files one at a time#wegh. It'll get done. Eventually.#I'll have so much more bullshit once I actually finish the damn comic my wife radically altered my life with hehehe#I cannot wait to start posting about Alpharius Trionicon. He's the fucking worst if you couldn't tell by name alone and I love him so much#Anyway I just had a very specific joke/pun in my head in the shower then it turned into a whole *thing* like it usually does.#I usually don't explain shit but the shower idea centered around getting the SI acronym to work for hyper specific jokes.#Still can't decide if I want to lock in on “Scientific Instrument” because it fits *so well* for *so many reasons*#But “Synthetic Intelligence” is more generic in a more understandable way... Eeh.. It's a little *too* generic. “Instrument” is cooler.#Once my wife helps me understand her lil fucker more I'll come up with an even shitter joke using “Y/N” so I can do Y/N x SI x SI bullshit!#Oh! The matrix triune project is coming along slowly as well!! I think I mentioned that microphone project once or twice now hehe#I'm gonna make so many shitty covers of songs once I get the soundproofing to start focusing on vocal training stuff#It's been quite a fun time aboard the nemesis!! There's so much to “Blog” about that it's hard to really know when to start *or* stop hehe!#And the fact that all these projects are all interwoven is so fucking wonderful!! I FINALLY feel able to fully grasp my own focus!!#My brain is like a particle collider for certain interests now. I can reliably just.. Spit things out and tie it into the other interests!#It's sometimes exhausting but in such a new way. Like a relieving exhaustion?#Still figuring that part out!!#Anyway that's enough personal project vagueposting I should really be getting back to work hehe this was fun
6 notes · View notes
fatheroblivion · 11 months
Text
tagged by @gotta-clue to post 10 songs from my music library on shuffle!
Same Man I Was Before by Oingo Boingo
You Ain't Goin' Nowhere by The Byrds
Rainy Day Women #12 & 35 by Bob Dylan
Real Love Song by Nothing But Thieves
覚醒 (Kakusei) by Superfly
This is the Last Time by The National
Way of the Triune God - Hallelujah Version by Tyler Childers
Mother's Little Helper by The Rolling Stones
Acoustic #3 by The Goo Goo Dolls
Oh Ms Believer by Twenty One Pilots
tagging: @bearlybeyond 💙
2 notes · View notes
indigo-starcatcher · 1 year
Text
@risingwiththeheatabove thanks for the tag, angel!! 🤍
rules: shuffle your ‘on repeat’ playlist and post the first ten tracks, then tag ten people (I will tag whomever I please, tyvm)
1. Cypress Hills & The Big Country - Colter Wall
2. Darlin' - Houndmouth
3. Snake Mountain Blues - Colter Wall
4. Cowpoke - Colter Wall
5. Way of The Triune God - Tyler Childers
6. Stardust Chords - Greta Van Fleet
7. Dreamer of The Dawn - Crown Lands
8. Always There - Greta Van Fleet
9. Dirty Sexy Money - The Struts
10. Sleeping On The Blacktop - Colter Wall
@myfriendtheghost @jakekiszkasbelly-button @malany-gvf @jakekiszkasleftnutsack @dannythedog @belovedsamuel @sunfl0wer-power @sammykiszkamyass @sammyscherub
5 notes · View notes
thetriunepath · 2 years
Text
The Ways || The Triune Path
The Ways are paths in which our lives may be carved and understood. A member of the Triune Path may choose to follow one specific Way, or to dabble in all equally, but all overlap and all play a part in each other's enlightenment. 
Below are basic summaries of the Ways, with more detailed posts to come.
Tumblr media
The Way of Sky
The path of splendour. Of hope and explosive passion. This path is that of compassion and love but also of aggressive justice and fury.
The Way of Sea
The path of patience. Of knowledge and quiet observation. This path is that of discovery over action and of letting the current carry us.
The Way of Middle-Air
The path of mystery. Of taking hold of one's own Fate and crafting our own future in the understanding that nothing is certain.
7 notes · View notes
kendrixtermina · 2 years
Text
The Withdrawn Triad & the Freudian Ego
Welcome to today’s entry from the Theory Post List – I think this may be The Good One
There is something that had always stumped me about the association of the Hornevian Triads with the freudian triune self.
Generally the way it’s explained, you’re told that the superego contains expectations & civilized values from society, the id contains your animal impulses and the ego is the bit that „has to mediate between them“, & that’s often where it’s left at with no further elaboration.
It’s easy to see how the Dutyful/Compliant types want to be good & moral, & how the assertive types go straight for what they want. But what’s the withdrawn triad have to do with ego? Where does any ‚mediation‘ come in? Maybe 9 could be seen as mediating between different parts of oneself but how does it apply to 4 or 5.
Sure, there’s some snobbish 4s and 5s around (9s less so) but generally when people speak of someone who has a „Big Ego“, they’re picturing an Assertive Type who’s somewhat low on self-awareness. So, rather someone who has a Big Id.
But of course they’d be using the term „ego“ in the more colloqiual sense of meaning ‚pride‘ or  ‚self-concept’, not in the same sense as in the psychological theory.
So I went to do some reading. I figured that trying to get how exactly the old-timesy psychologists thought about the ego. The golden key here was this quote by Freud: „The Ego is the censor of reality“. There was a diagram to go with that that showed the ego as a circle looking out onto, or interfacing with reality while the superego and if were attached to it on the other side.
After all, your animal impulses can want alot, your internalized values can demand alot, but it may not actually be possible to accomplish it in reality. You may want to fly or feel like you should be able to fly, but if you walk of a cliff you’ll die.
So, the ego’s job is to determine what reality is. Bam. Let that sink in. Does that not make all the sense?
& perhaps you can already sort of see how each of the withdrawn types does this coming from their dominant center. 5 wants to know what reality is in the sense of building a complete mental map of it. 4 filters it through the personal lens of the heart center – what’s my reality? My identity, my meaning, my significance. 4s pay attention to & mull over their feelings & memories to find what it means about them as individuals. And 9 of course has often been described as being concerned with the question of ‚what does it mean to be here?‘ on a very basic level and having this unique holistic view of the world & a knack for sinking their attention completely into experiences, feelings and people.
This tells you at once why those are generally introverted people & why they’d spend a lot of time in contemplation & spend much time revisiting/reorganizing past memories. The goal is to process everything thoroughly to extract reality from it – whether as insight, personal meaning or just unencumbered experience. High processing means high energy cost means introvert. (though there are exceptions)
You’re not finished working through the first thing when the next one comes so eventually you throw up your hands like „No more things please! Gotta work through the backlog first.“
When you think of it that way, you can finally understand how each triad’s orientation results in their characteristic behavior and ‚reaction speed‘.
For example, why are the Id types assertive/agressive? You could say that it’s cause they’re selfish, but that would be based on an old 20th century misrepresentation of how evolution actually works. For a pack animal survival of the fittest can also mean cooperation, so we do have pro-social instincts. A 7 might invite all their friends to free pizza cause gets them a big dopamine hit. An 8 might intimidate someone who hassled their little brother out of a territorial instinct. A 3 might donate a heap of cash to charity cause it looks good. The starving children are no less fed if you don’t pass some moralistic unicorn pure of heart test.
No, rather what makes the Assertive Types assertive is speed. Your lizard brain is always available to you for referencing and comparing against, since it is inside your skull. It’s the oldest and hence the quickest & the most optimized for its particular jobs.
Their ‚core game loop‘ goes from action to thought, from strategy to implementation, with the effect that data intake and feelings lag behind, yes, but also resulting in amazing realtime responses, hence why 7s 3s and 8s are usually (though not always) extroverts.  
Now let’s look at the compliant/dutyful types – external rules & expectations would be largely stored in your memory & hence especially impacted by the environment. Unlike lizard instincts that are inborn, memory has to be learned and retrieved, but it’s still reasonably quick & cheap to access.
The catch comes when you have no rule available for a new situation. Then you might have to ask advice. However, this also means that you are benefitting from the wisdom of the crowd, so to speak: You needn’t reinvent the wheel, and you can more flexibly respond to social environments. (Obglitaroy note that knowing the rules doesn’t always mean following them - they’re data to work with. )
These types go quickly from Intake to Implementation, which can lead to great productivity & responsibly doing what needs to be done. But they can also miss or struggle with the ‚strategizing‘ step, responding to doing & back without checking that they’re „aimed“ in the right direction.
Lastly, the withdrawn triad would have a heavy emphasis on processing & the possible trap of never getting to implementation due to getting stuck in a loop of intake & processing. (having thoughts & fantasies & then having feelings based on those fantasies, ad infinitum.)
Rather than referencing external input or ‚just doing it‘, the emphasis is on the processing step. With the obvious pitfall that, its no use to see reality clearly if you don’t do anything with that info - & even your conclusions themselves may be limited if they are never tested.
The Censor of Reality
Step 2 here is to try & further go into detail how each of the three types is tied to/ an overdominance of a particular aspect of/ function of determining reality.
There have been a lot of frameworks by Freud, Szondi and other contemporaries as well as more modern writers but they all have their own problems & bring in many extraneous factors uneeded to make my point so rather than bore you with long-winded preambles, I will try to construct my point from scratch greek philosopher style.
So, on the most basic level out sophisticated thinking functions are arrays of pattern recognizers – „Tiger spotted!“. Of these, some tend to fire together/ be connected, whereas some networks of neurons inhibit each other.
So the most basic distinction is „present/absent“ or „connected/ not connected“. Objects in the environment can be the same or different. (presence or absence of a connection)
If we see two objects as related, the same or conneced, that means they cause some circuits to fire together.
This applies to our self-concept as well, which is another domain of the ego (hence the very name ‚ego‘). If we perceive that we are „the same“ as someone or feel „connected“ to someone, that means that our concept of ourselves and our concept of the other person are connected, or that we connect the object activity etc. to our self-concept.
A sort of extreme of this ‚Lumping Function‘ can be experienced if you take a lot of drugs and feel „one with the universe“.
What’s really happened is that the LSD or whatever has downregulated your default mode pathwork that normally regulates what we’d think of as the ego. Lumping goes on overdrive, so, it’s really your concept of yourself that gets connected to your concept of the universe.
Makes you consider that in a sense you’ve never actually interacted with anything, just your concepts of them, & the darkness of your skull…
At this point the connection to type 9 should be obvious, since those sometimes experience a low-level form of ‚one with the universe‘ even when perfectly sober. Perception is weighted towards noticing similarities. (which may be absolutely real, truly present similarities that others miss) & its hard sometimes to distinguish what’s yours & what’s someone else’s.
The boundary between concepts, & between self & others, is fuzzy.
Since you want to be connected, or, feel your surroundings are almost kinda part of you, separation feels scary. Like severing part of yourself.
But this also lends itself to empathy, intuition, a good spatial awareness and broad holistic thinking – taking in subtle clues from the environment that others would not let in, or filter on. Basically everything 9s are awesome at.
Now for it’s opposite, what we may call the ‚Splitting Function‘. The perception of distinction, when two things in reality are not the same.
Like with the Lumping Function, this also applies to the self-concept: If the Lumping Function is the drive to be connected to the environment, the Splitting Function is the drive to maintain the separation & independence of the self, to limit its connections. Surely none of us could function without at least some degree of independence. One way this can be attained is by just labeling the object as external to the self. Not mine. Nothing to do with me. Not connected.
But what if you actually need the external object? You can’t just ignore all of reality, after all. Well in that case, this can be solved by integrating external things into the self. For example, if you internalize the message of ‚brush your teeth‘, Mommy no longer needs to tell you to brush your teeth, and you gain some independence.
Either way, be it by disconnecting/disinvesting, or „bringing in“, the self lessens connections to things outside itself.
It follows that if there’s an overdominance of this in one individual , one would want to „bring in“ conceptual representations of as many things as possible – not to „be one with“ the universe but to contain it within the self. There’s drug trip stories to go with this, too, usually unpleasant ones of the ‚everything‘s an illusion and I’m all alone’ sorts. The ones about being God or being the universe may also be a variant of this.
Dependency & contact, especially forced unwanted contact, anything that would jeaopardize the separateness and integrity of the self, would be feared.
And at this point you’ve probably caught my drift.
Which leaves just one more.
The ‚Symbolic‘ Function.
As living beings we’re not just determining reality so we can experience or look at it, but typically we want to do something with that understanding. For this we need something more than just a conceptualization of a world as various objects that are connected or not connected, same or not same: We need to know which ones are important.
That’s a function that is not so strong in 9s („everything has equal priority“) or 5s („information for information’s sake“) for example.
In psychology speak they sometimes talk about the process of cathexis, which is to connect objects in the environment with instinctual drives and emotions.
A classic example is money. What the heck is money? Just paper. In the stone age there was no money, our ancestors did not evolve to chase green paper.
But due to the magic of symbolic thinking, we’ve connected money to things that apes do value – like food, attractiveness, social status. So people fight just as desperately for money as apes fight for food. Sometimes it gets halfway forgotten that a symbol is not the thing itself.
Money is not food, you cannot eat it.
If reckless decisions made to gain money lead to the collapse of society, you will no longer be able to exchange money for food.
Another example is connecting music or colors with emotion.
This, too, can be influenced by drugs said to act on the ‚ego‘ – many classic psychedelics target a receptor that’s known to play a role in assigning meaning or significance. Play music to a bunch of people on acid, and they will read a lot more meaning into the lyrics.
Of course one could see that as the drug confusing you so you see meaning where none is, but is that really true? After all, meaning is not a measurable property. There are shared symbols yes but ultimately all meaning is subjective, assigned by the individual. Being high just stimulates the same function that is used all the time.
So, same game, imagine a person with an overdominance of symbolic fuction, primed to see the emotional associations and „meanings“ in everything, with a pronounced subjectivity & a strong perception of emotional associations.  They’d have a strong sense of important and not important, different assignments of others be damned.
Imagine what it means to apply this to one’s self-concept, what such a person would want.
It figures they’d be constantly assigning meaning to things about the self, like thoughts & feelings, & would want their choices, life & relationships to be full of significance & depht, whereas insignificance would be feared - & from that can spring the whole trap of avoiding similarity with others & amplifying negativity to keep a sense of significance & all that jazz, but the affinity for symbol may be yet more fundamental.
Tl;dr: The Withdrawn Types are ‚ego‘ types because they’re concerned with processing reality.
10 notes · View notes
yieldfruit · 2 years
Note
I'm wondering why you have the views about Hillsong and other charismatic churches?
Hi, thanks so much for your question. I used to listen to some Bethel music actually, maybe 10 years ago? I even visited the church in Redding because I was curious, I had heard their teachings were doctrinally unsound, but I wanted to check it out for myself. I learned quickly it was off - there was a woman teaching over the congregation and it was more of a self-help/Jesus gives you your best life now message as opposed to exegetically studying the Word of God, the Bible. There were other things to note as well that were concerning, but the biggest thing for me was the lack of doctrine and a woman teaching over men and women.
I have had a few friends that are into the Charismatic Movement and one theme I notice is that they are always seeking God for what he can do for them advantageously, meaning everything with God is based upon God meeting their needs/requests - seeking him for what he can do for them as opposed to worshipping him for who he is and worthy of our worship based on his glory.
Is Hillsong a biblically solid church?
Hillsong Church was founded in 1983 in Sydney, Australia, by former "Global Senior Pastors" Brian and Bobbie Houston. Hillsong is probably best known for their praise and worship music, having recorded dozens of popular songs since 1992, including the church favorite “Shout to the Lord.” Besides being Australia’s largest church, Hillsong has locations around the world, including campuses in Kiev, London, New York, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Moscow, São Paulo, and other cities. Hillsong Church was originally a part of the Assemblies of God of Australia (now called the Australian Christian Churches), but formed its own denomination in 2018. Brian Houston stepped down from his leadership role in March 2022 amid allegations of sexual misconduct.
Is Hillsong Church a biblical church? Their stated beliefs on their official website include the basic doctrines of the triune God, salvation by grace through faith in Christ, and the reality of heaven and hell. There are a couple of concerns, however. One statement on their “What We Believe” page is curiously lacking: “We believe in the power and significance of the Church and the necessity of believers to meet regularly together for fellowship, prayer and the ‘breaking of bread.’” This statement alludes to Acts 2:42, which says the early church “devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer.” What’s missing in the Hillsong statement is “the apostles’ teaching.” Why is this omitted?
A more obvious concern is Hillsong’s ordination of women as pastors, in contradiction of Scripture’s teaching that men are to be the spiritual leaders of the church (1 Timothy 2:11–12). Bobbie Houston, co-pastor of Hillsong Sydney, told The Christian Post in an October 16, 2014, interview that, when it comes to women in leadership, “the church needs to come of age sometimes and just grow up.”
Probably most troubling is Hillsong’s embrace of the Word of Faith movement. From the Hillsong website: “We believe that God wants to heal and transform us so that we can live healthy and blessed lives in order to help others more effectively.” Going along with the teaching that God always wills to heal and that “blessed” equals “healthy” is the prosperity gospel, which adds that God wills to enrich us financially. In Pastor Brian Houston’s 1999 book You Need More Money, he promotes the prosperity gospel: “We have to become comfortable with wealth, and break the bondage, guilt and condemnation of impoverished thinking. Poverty is definitely not God’s will for His people. In fact, all His promises talk of blessing and prosperity” (page 8). Houston insists that he only promotes seeking wealth for unselfish purposes—such as investing in ministry—but it is hard to reconcile the idea that “poverty is definitely not God’s will” with Paul’s teaching to be “content in any and every situation, whether well fed or hungry, whether living in plenty or in want” (Philippians 4:12, emphasis added).
The Hillsong Church has been criticized for its leaders’ reticence to take a position on homosexuality. Former Hillsong New York Pastor Carl Lentz, fired in 2021 for marital infidelity, declined to comment on gay marriage in a televised 2013 interview: “Often people want you to make these big statements about things [e.g., gay marriage] and I don’t believe it’s fair. I don’t think a public forum is always the best place to talk about something that’s so sensitive and important to so many because in a public forum there’s no discussion there” (quoted by Meeks, G., “NYC Megachurch Pastor Believes Sexuality Shouldn’t Be Discussed in Public Forum,” Charisma News, 12/20/2013). The fact that any issue is “sensitive” or “important” should not prevent a pastor from clearly communicating God’s Word in a public forum. Can we only answer direct questions about morality privately or when we can “discuss” the matter?
As with many ministries, there are positive and negative facets to Hillsong. Are there people being saved through the Hillsong Church? Yes, and we praise God for that. Can a Christian worship the Lord with a Hillsong-produced song? Yes. Can a person be misled with the false idea that God always wants us to be healthy and rich? Unfortunately, yes. Should a church exercise discernment in the matter of song choice and where the royalties are going? Again, yes. “Do not treat prophecies with contempt but test them all; hold on to what is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:20–21).
(From: https://www.gotquestions.org/Hillsong-Church.html)
Another great resource: Why Your Church Shouldn't Play Bethel or Hillsong Music
11 notes · View notes
@lunahorizon replied to your post “They may call on God to help them win the war -- or on the Goddess to help the Goddess win the war -- or to both, for a triune...”
this is gorgeous
The best thing about this? The OP is "a bias to interpret ambiguous information in a threat-related manner." There's a reason people sometimes say this as a response to stuff like "some of your friends may be X's"; it's not a threat.
But, for reasons related to my OCD, sometimes I take things like this literally, and then it's hard to distinguish from the sort of thing someone will say about me and me alone
2 notes · View notes
eternal-echoes · 2 years
Text
“Rapid social and economic development in the past half century has not been accompanied by an equally fervent spiritual progress, as we witness what Pope Francis calls “globalized indifference.”
It is the result of giving in to the delusion that we are self-sufficient, that man is his own measure in a pervasive individualism. It is manifested in the fear of suffering in our societies, our closing our eyes and hearts to the poor and vulnerable, and, in a very despicable way, in how we discard the unborn and the elderly.
When he prophetically announced the Second Vatican Council in the Apostolic Constitution Humanae Salutis, Saint John XXIII remarked that the human community was in “turmoil” as it sought to establish a new world order where humanity relies entirely on technical and scientific solutions instead of God.
Today we are witnessing the next stage – and the consummation – of the efforts to build a utopian paradise on earth without God. It is the stage of denying sin and the fall altogether. But the death of God results in the burial of good, beauty, love and truth. Good becomes evil, beauty is ugly, love becomes the satisfaction of sexual primal instincts, and truths are all relative.
So all manner of immorality is not only accepted and tolerated today in advanced societies, but even promoted as a social good. The result is hostility to Christians, and, increasingly, religious persecution.
“The future of the world and the Church passes through the family.” These prophetic words of Saint John Paul II show how the Church, in our time, must, above all, defend and promote the beauty of the Christian family in fidelity to God’s design. In his post-synodal Exhortation on the Family, Amoris Lætitia (“The Joy of Love”), Pope Francis states clearly: “In no way must the Church desist from proposing the full ideal of marriage, God’s plan in all its grandeur … proposing less than what Jesus offers to the human being.” This is why the Holy Father openly and vigorously defends Church teaching on contraception, abortion, homosexuality, reproductive technologies, the education of children and much more.
The generous and responsible love of spouses, made visible through the self-giving of parents, who welcome and nurture children as a gift of God, makes love visible in our generation. It makes present the perfect charity of the Trinity. “If you see charity, you see the Trinity,” wrote Saint Augustine.
From the beginning of creation, God, who is a communion of persons – Father, Son and Holy Spirit, three different Persons, yet one – has built a Trinitarian structure into our very nature. In the continent of my origin, Africa, we declare: “Man is nothing without woman, woman is nothing without man, and the two are nothing without a third element, which is the child.” The Triune God dwells within each of us and imbues our whole being: God’s own image and likeness.
Every human being, like the persons of the Trinity, has the capacity to be united with other persons in communion through the vinculum caritatis – the bond of charity – of the Holy Spirit. The family is a natural preparation and anticipation of the communion that is possible when we are united with God. The family, as it were, is a natural praeparatio evangelica – written into our nature.
This is why the devil is so intent on destroying the family. If the family is destroyed, we lose our God-given, anthropological foundations and so find it more difficult to welcome the saving Good News of Jesus Christ: self-giving, fruitful love.”
- Cardinal Robert Sarah
3 notes · View notes