special hell of wanting to reblog an art post for being otherwise funny and including your favorite characters but being so so very almost comically sex repulsed and so not wanting to reblog it bc there's nsfw text and you can't get past it
60 notes
·
View notes
sorry to bother you but this is bothering me a lot. so user txtttletale took a screenshot of your post and made your statement "what the fuck happened to t4t???" out to be "these guys always just want to fuck us".
figured you should be informed about this
(context)
apparently she has bad takes pretty often, so i'm not surprised to be completely honest with you, but i just want to say:
if you GENUINELY think i was referring to having sex here, you are purposefully misunderstanding my point.
T4T is not just about sex. it also applies to friendship, and love, and community.
that should be obvious lol.
16 notes
·
View notes
AND that brings me back to that weird ass "marriage was a Job for rich noblewomen what if she tried to make it work instead!!" Post because again that's just. Completely ignoring the already abysmal rights for women in that time period. Women were not considered people. They got married and were the man's property, legally. He had the right to do whatever he wanted to her. Idk about ~European~ society but in lots of other places women couldnt even initiate divorce. Why would she be able to? Property doesn't really have legal rights. Divorce is still forbidden in the Catholic Church. She owed him sex because that was the Man's Need and Right and she was literally a vessel for his pleasure (this still exists today in the Church). She owed him children, preferably sons, because she was in a Heterosexual marriage contract in a patriarchal society. Any man that truly loved and respected his wife and valued her regardless of reproductive capability and the requirements of the marriage contract was an anomaly. Quite literally going against the norm. If a girl or woman was learning she'd be getting married and was devastated it was because of the objectification and loss of autonomy. Ik today it's portrayed as a desire to frolick in fields and a desire for romantic love to be the foundation of marriage rather than money but from what I've read over the years the legally permissible violence in heterosexual marriage was, unsurprisingly, a MASSIVE TURNOFF to getting married.
11 notes
·
View notes
not to keep vagueposting about animal welfare discourse, but i happened to run into one of the blogs that was shitting on scout for their cow husbandry and the shit they were saying was so fucking stupid...it was something along the lines of 'rabbits aren't social animals because their wild ancestors have a social group set entirely by mating/the HRS tries to force you to bond rabbits unnecessarily and is a peta-affiliated organization/its unnecessary to spay female rabbits because the 85% association between uterine cancer and not spaying is only supported by two studies', all of which may make sense for breeding rabbits is complete and utter bullshit when dealing with pet rabbits.
Rabbits are indeed social animals that grow anxious when alone and should have SOME form of companionship most hours of the day. This does not have to be another rabbit, and the urging to establish a bonded pair is typically done for people who are OUT OF THE HOUSE most of the day. HRS and shelters don't 'force' pairings, they encourage them because having someone around 24/7 isnt always viable in American households. When I tried to get Celeste bonded because I was worried about her welfare (this was when I was 14 and new to rabbits), both the HRS and shelters talked us out of it because she very clearly did not care about other buns, and didn't need to be bonded because there was always someone around them. But if you're a singular person who's away from home most of the time, then yes you need some sort of partner animal because it reduces stress in your rabbit.
Those social structures are ofc going to be different if you have unfixed breeding animals, but the core aspect of it is still the same. Rabbits are social animals. They are comforted by the presence of others around them, form bonds with other rabbits, and feel more secure in groups. Just because they are more territorial when unfixed (as they should!) doesn't reduce the fact that they are social prey animals, it just means that you need to keep them in different conditions than you would a fixed creature with less hormonal urges
The HRS is not aligned with PETA. They denounce affiliations with meat breeders because they're entirely based on improving the welfare of rabbits that are kept as pets. I can see why some might feel offended on their stance against meat rabbits, but rabbits are still primarily viewed as livestock, and after hearing enough comments about people wanting to eat my rabbit, I can understand why they'd be so clear on it. People are assholes about pets that are commonly viewed as feeder animals.
There is indeed a high risk associated between UNBRED unspayed female rabbits and uterine cancer. This is supported by several studies on animals with similar breeding lifestyles by multiple veterinary institutions. You won't notice it in your breeding females because the risk is SPECIFICALLY for unbred animals, aka most pets. So yes, spaying is necessary for your doe's health if you do not intend to regularly breed or have stopped regularly breeding
Even if there wasn't a very real danger to their health, you'd still need to get them fixed to reduce behavioral problems. Unfixed rabbits are much more territorial, destructive, and aggressive, making them more difficult to keep in a home environment. They will growl, they will lunge and bite (and rabbit bites are not something you want to fuck with- I have scars from Celeste's nips), they will piss and shit to mark their territory and it WILL be pungent and unsanitary even if they are litterbox trained. They can still be cuddly with you, sure, that won't reduce their value as pets, but a perpetually sexually frustrated and territorial animal is not fun to deal with and is arguably unethical for the rabbit. If you want a pet rabbit, you need to get them spayed. And I say this from personal experience- Celeste wasn't spayed when we got her, but after she did get spayed, she became much more manageable and less likely to bite. She was still manageable beforehand, but afterwards she was a hell of a lot more relaxed and not stressed
There's nothing wrong with having significantly different husbandry because you are a meat/fur breeder; unfixed animals have different temperaments, different needs, and are typically kept in different conditions that are more economically and behaviorally suited to turning a profit. But those care requirements change drastically when you have only one to two fixed animals in a home environment, which means that you cannot pass judgement on pet care requirements when you're a meat breeder, and visa versa.
27 notes
·
View notes
idk why you all have posts where people make sex jokes and Neil’s like “I don’t get it” cuz he’s ace but like the thing is I’m Ace and ask anyone in my class and they’ll tell you I make so many sex jokes, like I’m staring at everyone like this 😏
and thats because I know what it means, being Ace doesn’t mean you don’t know shit about sex, like yeah maybe the reason Neil doesnt understand sex jokes is because he was never exposed to these sort of things but like c’mon he’s gonna know stuff Nicky is literally his Cousin in law.
41 notes
·
View notes
concept: me, several months ago, going to get my second monkeypox vaccine, and tbh putting it off for a few months because the experience of getting my first dose was so uncomfortable. I walk up to the first person I have to pass by. when she says "UM you KNOW this vaccine is JUST for gay men, RIGHT?" in a really judgemental way, instead of the real awkward response I gave, I instead say "oh, yeah, my boyfriend calls me a faggot during sex, it's all good."
4 notes
·
View notes