Here's a Linked Universe uquiz, main cast only! I have been informed that it is very surprising, and also very pretty.
93 notes
·
View notes
My biggest beef with free market stuff is the recurring idea of everyone being educated, intelligent, and acting rationally all the time.
People, straight up, do not act rationally. Even educated, intelligent people will do the dumbest, most irrational shit sometimes. You have to account for the irrational behavior, and if you don’t then you’re being just as much of a fantastical utopian as hardline socialists and communists are.
If your economic theory doesn’t acknowledge that people are dumb as fuck more often than not, then the theory is garbage and you should start over and try again.
67 notes
·
View notes
Something else that makes me sympathetic to Pharma's situation is like. Idk if there's an actual term for this or if someone smarter and more academic wrote it about some real life context that actually matters.
But, so we've already established among Pharma stans that the circumstances at Delphi were blackmail/torture with no real way out that wouldn't involve Pharma being responsible for people getting killed (either killing patients for the deal or having everyone die bc he failed his end of the deal).
And I feel like while "he's still in the wrong because he killed people" is part of it, another sort of implicit part is the idea that Pharma should've been willing to take more personal risk, maybe even risk dying? I mean, Ratchet does ask "why didn't you just detonate it near the DJD" (to which Pharma responds that he did try to get Sonic and Boom to do it, but they refused) so like
Idk I feel like we do have this social notion of martyrs as a very romantic ideal, people you can praise for being so brave and strong and righteous that they ended their own lives for their cause, while you can also coo about how sad and tragic it is that dying is what it took for them to do the right thing. But at the same time I feel like in reality, having an expectation that people become martyrs is kind of a toxic social norm bc like. It's very easy to demand that others sacrifice their lives for some Ultimate Moral Good when you yourself aren't experiencing the same hardships as they are. And ultimately it is kind of fucked up to tell someone "the moral thing you should've done was risk your life/kill yourself" because asking someone to pay their life to do the right thing is no small request. And sure, the typical response would be to call them a "coward" for caring more about saving their own skin instead of doing the right thing... but again, death is a really scary thing and self-preservation is a really strong instinct, so it kind of feels like having this binary view of "you're either a Brave Hero who sacrifices your life for everyone else or a Dirty Coward who's too scared of dying to do what's right" is kind of fucked up?
I guess the best way to describe it is that if someone willingly gives up their life as a sacrifice to others, it can be a noble thing because it's a choice they made willingly, but if it becomes a Moral Standard that in order to be a Good Person you have to be unafraid of throwing your life away and if you aren't willing to die you're a Cowardly Bad Person, that's when it becomes toxic.
Idk, I guess how this ties back to Pharma is that he was never in a position where he expected to make these kinds of moral decisions/ultimatums. He's a doctor who doesn't even get into combat, his job is to heal and not to kill, he's behind the front lines in a hospital that's supposed to be a safe, neutral place for him to heal people. So in the face of suddenly having a "murder people on behalf of me, or I murder everyone you swore to protect" ultimatum thrust upon him, I understand why Pharma wasn't """"""""""brave enough"""""""""" to "do the right thing" (whatever that would've been in the case of Delphi). You could argue that maybe a frontliner soldier accepted the burden of possibly dying for their cause and they've become used to it as someone who lives that reality every single day, but I feel like for Pharma, who's a doctor and a protected non-combatant (from what we can tell), that sort of risking of his life/living with the fact his life could be snuffed out any day isn't something he would've been prepared for at all.
And for me personally, from an outsider's perspective, it strikes me as kind of unethical to go "oh well he should've just detonated the bomb himself even if it killed him" bc again, there's a difference between witnessing a moral conundrum as a bystander versus being the person living with it and being under time pressure where it's do-or-die. Just as part of my personal standards, I feel like death is such a huge consequence/burden of someone's actions (literally you are no longer alive, any potential you had left is cut short, you cease to exist on this plane) that it feels rather callous to go "Well you should've just been willing to die for your beliefs if you really cared that much!!!"
10 notes
·
View notes
being a traumatised autistic means just trying to have a small scream in a vent channel about a shitty thing that happened to me, but it turning into a several-paragraph ramble because I've been trained that I'm not allowed to express hurt at someone's actions without being able to justify how every single circumstance or contributing factor plays into my reaction, else *I'm* the bad guy for unjustifiably attacking them
2 notes
·
View notes
Honestly I know "think of the poor minors in fandom" is usually a red flag but this time it's annoyingly incoherent
Someone who was not posting about the problematic fic they got called out for is harming minors how? The two "what they should have done" takes I've seen offered are either 1- blocking all minors who tried to interact with their unrelated blog content because they should have known their vibes were unsafe for children, or 2- actually post about their darkfic kinks and reading history in detail to provide "transparency" FOR said minors so they could choose not to interact. With content that wasn't there unless they had done this. What the actual fuck
So end result of this is putting problematic content all over minor's dashes as "a PSA warning", telling any minors who followed this person that they can block and are now "safe" from this "evil predator in disguise" (who they seemingly never had a problem with before), and generally contributing to an online culture telling minors that anyone they follow could be secretly evil and unsafe AND that it's ok because if there is the slightest sliver of evidence it will eventually be found and aired so that the sinner can be ostracized (btw obviously we know none of you have ever left a comment on a wrong fic... or else 🙃)
Maybe just... don't do this?
9 notes
·
View notes
What book are you reading?? With Wilhelm and Laurence and Emma!! I’m looking for book recs rn so your post was interesting to me!! Thank you!!
7 notes
·
View notes