really love characters who have varied panic responses. kirk stating himself that he does not panic outright, externally, not in high-stress dangerous situations, but instead becomes tense and level like a wound string, on-guard: mostly because his role as captain necessitates that he maintain level rationality even when facing potential death as his training as 'the guy who tells you what to do when shit hits the fan' requires, but also because his childhood experiences taught him early that drowning in the desperate haziness of panic won't help you survive. especially as kirk already follows his intuition so deeply. he learned to grasp and contort the feeling. spock is the main person who represses his emotions, of course, but kirk does it to those deep-set, personal ones (this includes how he doesn't reveal anything truly personal about himself willingly 90% of the time, only what others already know/shallow anecdotes) in a much more subtle way that's really interesting to me. certified expert at avoiding the subject as long as he isnt caught out on the lie. professional bluffer.
in terms of past or parents we dont know much!!! hes known as the heart-on-his-sleeve guy!!! like yes he yells, he gets irritated, excited, hes a whirlwind of quick-thinking and plans and intuition, he goes out of his way to connect with his crew and shows it, when he puts on a little act or bluff he puts his heart into it and clearly enjoys the dramatics so much, at times he wears his heart on his sleeve, he laughs openly and is honest to spock about what he means to him, he's very sun-coded to me in a burning, passionate way, always intertwined with the stars and seeking them out, but when it comes to genuine deep-set turmoil? we dont actually know all that much about him??? hes so full of emotion and character (i love fics where spock characterises jim's mind/bond as a whirl of colour and sensations, hes a quick thinker!!! intuitive!! lively!!!) and yet its still so outwardly surface level. tarsus iv gets mentioned like twice? so especially here where kirk gets briefly jumpscared by the creature, because like:
its subtle but his eyes. his eyesss!!!!! kirk commands with his emotions but there's always some sort of level of control to it, or he transforms them into something that spurs on others or uses them to ascertain a goal: seeing unguarded fear/distress in his eyes even if its faint and brief (in this instance) makes me go insane every single time. like!!! its such a small moment!!! he isnt even panicking!!! really, he just got jumpscared!!! its insignificant!!!!!!! but seeing a two-second flash of actual, naked apprehension is just...oughhh,,,,,,,,,
oh god, and dont even get me started on the galileo seven episode where he assumes a tense level-headedness throughout the whole thing, irritated and apprehensive but not panicking, making sure he maintains intelligent rationality, even when he has to leave them behind, but when spock and the crew are confirmed safe and the bridge is occupied the camera pans to him and his eyes look like they're fucking watering and he's so achingly relieved. don't even talk to me. im. fuck.
he shows so so much but at the same time reveals so little.
264 notes
·
View notes
btw about Neil Gaiman I periodically agree with the 'Neil Gaiman is annoying' stuff bc I feel like both he and Amanda Palmer seem like people who I would go insane stuck in a room with bc we have very different ideas about art and suchlike. and I also do think that the career trajectory he's on lately is cynically redoing his greatest hits and pretending that was the dream all along when it clearly was not. which is at best meh.
having said which
as far as I can tell by far the most common complaint about Neil Gaiman is "Snow, Glass, Apples is problematic/gross/it's got incest and rape and frames the child as the aggressor"
which strikes me as a weird complaint to pull out of a 40 year body of work tbh when that short story is pretty clearly coming from a place of 'how far can I push this'. like you don't have to like the story. I don't really like the story. but it is. a horror story.
like and this is the thing with particularly 90s alt horror right? a lot of the interest is in transgression and sitting in the worst possible perspective and seeing what happens if you pull those strings. like I really like Clive Barker for example but there's a good chunk of his short stories that I'm like I'm not picking up what you're putting down Clive this seems Kinda Off. but that willingness to write some trite or Bad Message horror fiction that doesn't land is imo a side effect of being willing to try writing uncomfortable and unpleasant fiction at all. which is what horror is for, among other things, it's for creating discomfort as a form of catharsis or engagement.
like I am not a huge fan of the type of sex-horror that pops up in a lot of Gaiman's work and other contemporary horror writers - to me I don't find it upsetting or horny it just ends up feeling kind of edgy and tryhard - but I'm also a bit like. it does seem like a lot of people's beef with Neil Gaiman is that In The 90s He Was A Horror Writer
and this approach to Problematic Horror in Snow, Glass, Apples I find kind of microcosmic of how The Discourse often approaches art in this kind of 1:1 way. if you write a story which seems to line up with rape apologia it can only be because you agree with it. if you write a story about transphobia you're a transphobe. if you write a story that makes me genuinely uncomfortable you're attacking me.
but artwork, especially art like horror that's not necessarily trying to provoke enjoyment as its main response, is necessarily hit and miss. and if what you're shooting for is discomfort then whether it works, falls flat or goes too far incredibly depends on your audience. and making good art - as in art that makes its audience think, art that opens the audience up to discomfort and catharsis and sticks with them and changes them - requires the space to experiment and tbh the space to fuck up. like they aren't all going to be winners and they certainly aren't all going to work for you as a singular audience.
personally I don't see the appeal of Snow, Glass, Apples, less cause it's nasty and more cause it's hack. ooh an edgy monstrous version of a fairy tale where there's lots of rape and cannibalism? you're soooo original Neil. but like. that's fine. I don't really vibe with like 70% of Neil Gaiman stuff I've read but I still like Neil Gaiman because the stuff that works for me really works for me.
idk I think there's a lot of folk on this website who shouldn't interact with horror cause they clearly aren't interested in being horrified. that's not everyone who dislikes Snow, Glass, Apples, but it's a real undercurrent to a lot of the criticism and tbh this kinda vibe is shit for art. making standout art What Is Good also requires being ready to make art which stands out for the wrong reasons. sometimes they'll be the same art to different people.
58 notes
·
View notes
2024 reads / storygraph
Lord of the Empty Isles
sci-fi/fantasy
set on a supposedly utopian planet recovering from a climate crisis, where bonds between people are able to be seen and manipulated (by some people)
follows a young man whose brother was cursed and killed by an infamous outlaw 5 years ago, and he’s finally able to curse him back - but it rebounds, as he’s somehow fatebound to the outlaw
to find a cure and save them both they have to team up, and he quickly finds out that the resources the outlaw is stealing go to the thousands of people neglected on prison planets, and he has to go against what he thought was right to help them
no romance, aroace MC, focus on platonic relationships
arc from netgalley, out june 6
16 notes
·
View notes
as you all well know by know i absolutely loathe the diminishment of the adopted robins to not being bruce's "real" children (i mean. i imagine most people do or i would hope so at least) and how this has been overexaggerated in canon at large by creating various unnecessary rifts and competitions between them and damian but that aside i do think it would genuinely have been funny in another world if bruce used being damian's "real" father as an excuse to actually like. impose on him. bc he was kinda soft with dick and jason (moreso dick) ya know like he would try to put his foot down on something and then he'd get too soft and be like yeah okay you're growing and finding yourself i can respect that etc etc but i'm obsessed with the idea of bruce looking at damian and being like actually you're going to school. end of discussion. and you're not going to use vigilantism as an excuse to find yourself. and so help me god if you refuse bc i will call in your mother
21 notes
·
View notes
therapy was “helpful” and I “liked it” and sigh I’ll “keep going”
14 notes
·
View notes
"Buck doesn't react to the ghosts because he has been able to see ghosts all his life and it's given him this fucked up relationship with death where he's both fascinated and desensitized to it" vs "Buck doesn't react to the ghosts because he spends most of the movie incredibly sleep deprived, constantly hallucinating and high off his ass on a transdimensional drug, so the ghosts are honestly only the 3rd weirdest thing thats happened to him that night"
18 notes
·
View notes
I'll be honest looking at your woman versions of artemy and daniil makes me feel like I have the plague itself since I start sweating and shaking with lesbian lust. they're soooooo good there are no words for it, thank u for blessing us with your art of them 💓
o7 glad you're liking them...!
i know they're not #much in terms of like character design since i'm just copy and pasting The Usual and then waving a magic wand at them but. well you know. if every game had crazy women in it i would play these games. give me the annoying cynical symbolist yuri where i can see homosexuality peeking through and I Will Now Play Your Game. i will.
11 notes
·
View notes
I could sit here for three hours and still not be able to touch even a smidge of the novel-length essay I’d like to write about jack’s teenage years and his addiction and his mental state and his dissociation from the world and his gradually distorted view of who and what he is or could be
and that’s before I even touch on the complex issue of what happened the night of the overdose and how aware (or unaware) of his actions jack was and the faint line between suicidal ideation and the desire to be numb to escape one’s torments, and which one jack was aiming for that day, and whether he’d even know the answer to this if asked
and after all of that I would still not come anywhere close to being able to fully analyze what jack’s stint at rehab was like, and what his thought process was like, and how complex someone’s mind must be to be doing time at rehab because hockey aggravated their anxiety so severely that they almost died, while also spending this time at rehab putting together a plan that’d allow them to go back to hockey - to go back to the source of all that, because even almost dying didn’t deter them from their dream
145 notes
·
View notes
My original unfiltered opinion of the chantry boom was "Anders that's so terrible! Well at least something interesting is finally happening in this boring ass game" and while I don't 100% agree with that it's like. 90% agree.
2 notes
·
View notes
so, i love and vibe w bi leo, it’s so good
however
something just hits different with gay leo who’s been performing heterosexuality for years
6 notes
·
View notes
gosh. drawing my botw lorule au again. i love my versions of these characters so much
4 notes
·
View notes
actually i feel like a whole essay could be written about "Random Humor" and how it did not really go away so much as get rebranded and change its presentation somewhat. tumblr especially loves its absurdist non-sequiturs but it is afraid to call it as it is (random humor) and quite frankly some of the posts on this site WISH they could be as funny as a ytp from 2009. i havent the braincells right now (or maybe ever idk) to write such an essay though
20 notes
·
View notes
It's like I blink and another WIP manifests...
2 notes
·
View notes
Do you think Steph and Dick would get along?
it would definitely take time. not to draw a comparison but one thing i really dislike about what bruce and stephanie's relationship eventually devolves into is it runs pretty parallel to the destruction of bruce's character in general. he's steadily stripped of his ability to empathize; his tendency to shift the weight of all burdens onto his own shoulders so as to spare the people he loves is reinterpreted as him being a commandeering control freak; he's cold, cutting, cruel. not to say dick should be any of these things, or at least not to the extent that bruce is written to embrace them comparatively, but if anyone was going to be exasperated with and critical of stephanie's tendency to jump into things headfirst and learn as she goes without necessarily any regard for protocol or safety, it would be dick. dick thrives on an organized operation and an understanding with his peers that they will not cross lines or act recklessly to endanger themselves or others. obv they do cross lines, the whole crux of teen titans comics lies in various sorts of unprecedented rogue elements when it comes to a mission. but the titans do also try to improve and be consistent and accountable where they can bc they know it's the key to a happier dick and a more well functioning team. stephanie's not really there yet mentally. she's eager to learn, and she's clearly capable of putting in the work when someone she respects is at the other end of the line, but she's also impatient, and she doesn't react well to orders. that's why you have to dialogue with her. if you respect her, she respects you. if you let her take the lead in manageable steps it will mean the world and more to her
and i do think dick is capable of being that person, but with extensive time and effort. he's spent so much of his life training specifically to do this job that he kind of overestimates what people in the same line of work are capable of on a disciplinary level, despite the fact that their experience might not match up with his own. that's something dixon's portrayal of dick during the prodigal era really takes for granted, bc dixon makes the assumption that tim easily follows dick's lead like a sprightly boy scout and dick responsively is the coolest guy ever rather than the uptight guy whose marriage recently went up in flames and left him feeling absolutely aimless with respect to his own aspirations and vigilante work. like yeah, dick is principled and he won't let real life shit get in the way of doing his job, but he's more than capable of being the most emotionally bitchy person ever while he's at it as we see from how he blows up at donna when she temporarily takes over the team. any interaction between dick and a young sidekick should be colored by an initial inability from him to reconcile the fact that he is working with a vigilante with the fact that he is also working with a child. it should bother him and frustrate him and push him to actually evaluate himself and his sometimes ridiculous expectations. and while i obv don't think stephanie exists to be the sounding board off of which various men work out their control issues or misogyny i do think it would be fun to see her sort of aspire to someone of dick's level (bc lbr. she totally would) while nonetheless putting him in his place as to how he's holding totally unrealistic expectations of an amateur teenager with no training facilities to her name
20 notes
·
View notes
Characterization discourse is so funny for me to watch because it’s people getting upset that a character they really like has their personality changed over time, whether this be because their a new iteration of the character in a new canon or their still in one canon but changed how they act because of different writers, usually to appeal to a newer fans which causes long time fans to be upset more often. It genuinely does suck to see a character you’ve liked possibly as early as your childhood be butchered by the writers just to try to appeal to a newer audience that they feel like a shell of them old selves, especially when this is a character you consider to be one of your favorites OR all time favorite…
But then I’m standing outside of this fire like “good fucking thing the only character I liked that has been reintroduced multiple times is from something that’s not really ongoing but also never fucked up his character to begin with!” Even if the trade of being a ryoma fan is some people just flanderize him.
4 notes
·
View notes