the one thing i feel pretty certain about for this episode is that america will not decide the election. a decision will be made, a president will be elected, but america will not be the deciding factor.
succession can’t mimic 2016 or 2020 point blank, that would be boring and have nothing to say. it can’t try to outdo trump because it’ll go too whacky and fall flat like veep’s last season (sorry conheads, no way he’s winning). but what it CAN do is illustrate the immensely corrupt, often arbitrary, and hugely influential nature of news media and conglomerations on political processes. i think probably jimenez will be in the lead, then atn/waystar does something to, i don’t know, discount votes or cast suspicion on jimenez or call the election for mencken early, and the tide will shift, even though the votes are already in. the votes don’t actually matter. the actual result doesn’t actually matter. that’s the power logan (and as an extension, billionaires and CEOs in general) hold. shiv says it herself to logan in s4e2: “just cause you say it’s true doesn’t make it true. everyone just fucking agrees with you and believes you, so it becomes true and then you can turn around and say like, 'oh, you see? see? i was right.'” but it doesn’t matter that logan’s “a human fucking gaslight,” everything he says comes true anyways. not because he was right, but because that’s how it works. he says things and then they happen, regardless of what the truth is or what should actually come to pass. that’s been one of the key throughlines since the very first episode of the entire show when, in response to kendall calling logan out of touch because times are changing and logan isn't changing with them, logan hisses that everyone always says you’re wrong until you do it and prove you were right: “you make your own reality.” you can't miss the bus if you're the one driving it. the election, the votes, the political process? none of that matters. it was always going to come down to the roys and their ilk (allies or enemies, just the top 1%) — that was the whole point of “what it takes” (the mencken episode) last season, after all.
i’ve seen lots of theories about what america will choose and how the candidates will respond and all that and i just don’t think that’s the show’s focus; i think the whole point is to demonstrate the lack of agency, the illusion of democracy. because, i mean, we’ve already seen the fall of democracy via fascist election and fascist election-denial, both in real life and in the countless (usually mid) satires created afterwards. it would be disappointing to see succession use the election to reiterate that same point of 'ohhh alt-right ahhhhh!!!' i don’t think it’ll be about ‘fascism’ at all — at least, not ‘trump-y’ fascism. it’ll be about fascism in the broader sense, the kind that doesn't sport a KKK hood (even when it keeps one tucked away in the attic). it's the fascism that every single roy (very much including shiv and kendall) aid and abet -- the fascism that so many succession fans don't seem to regard as fascism, despite it quite literally being the definition of fascism. trump wasn’t the entrance of fascism into our political process. he wasn’t the lone sign of the failing of american democracy. democracy in america has long been illusory, trump just made it more blatantly evident with his particular brand of hate-speech-ridden masculinist in-your-face fascism.
so i think that’s what this episode will hopefully focus on — america will not decide. corporations, news media, and the roys will. thus, the president will most likely become president not because the country supports his policies the most, but because he’s likely to agree to help block a business deal for a major media empire, and the other candidate is unlikely to. and this will likely come to pass due to said major media empire's interference and influence: they create their own reality. they say it, and everyone agrees with them and believes them, so it becomes true.
202 notes
·
View notes
my friend showed this to me and i need to share with others too
7 notes
·
View notes
Yelling about Dead End: Paranormal Park again!
Season two just came out, so obviously no spoilers, but oh my lord I can't recommend this show ENOUGH
The protagonists are absolutely amazing.
Barney Guttman, a fat, gay, Jewish trans man, and Normah Khaan, South Asian, Autistic, Bi girl. Also Barney's magic talking pug voiced by Alex Brightman (aka, Beetlejuice), working at a haunted theme park with a demon named Courtney. There's also a delightful cast of side characters
The representation is, imo, incredibly well handled (though I can't comment on what parts don't apply to me), with important topics dispersed among wacky demon hijinks, often at the same time!
I can't say much more without spoiling it, but I absolutely cannot reccomend this show enough. If you've been looking for something new to watch, give this a whirl!
137 notes
·
View notes
im so glad we're getting FHJY because of how excited people are for it, but honestly i wish i could be more excited about it :(( i want to like it so badly, but alas. ive only seen season one, though, should i give season two a shot? or is it more of the same?
14 notes
·
View notes
I’m tired of my coworkers not finishing the work they promised and leaving the team scrambling to create curriculum last minute I’m tired of doing the brunt of the work for three different courses when my coworkers are only teaching the one course I’m tired of my coworkers using the work I created and the data I compiled on their gradwork that’ll justify an increase in their pay when I get no pay increases for my own work I’m tired of the workload I’m tired of the hypocrisy I’m tired of the lack of compensation I’m tired of the burnout of education
6 notes
·
View notes
i think saying that the dark i know well romanticizes csa is fucking insane. if you think that perhaps it says something about you rather than the text.
1 note
·
View note
oh btw - watched gps (gay pirate show - can’t do the whole ofmd thing because i’ve seen people tagging stuff that for months and my brain still just reads it as ‘outfit of my day’ which i know doesnt make any sense but that’s the perils of skim-reading acronyms and having made an instagram in 2012 for you)
anyway i watched it, i don’t have the brainrot for it but it’s good, it’s fun! i like how much it’s willing to be silly and let anything be possible as long as it creates a scenario that’s funny or cool to see play out - lots of people ‘sailing’ what should be long distances in a little rowboat, randomly winding up in convenient/improbable places, downright sitcom-y tv tropes being bent to involve characters/situations from the golden age of piracy, costumes being historically inaccurate in the most creative and brilliantly designed ways (the 18th century take on pretentious theater director’s black turtleneck i am looking at you). The show itself is very unpretentious and up-front about what it wants to accomplish, and convincing the audience any of this was historically possible is not one of those things, which I can respect
if anything im slightly confused at the amount of stuff i’ve seen dedicated to just the two main guys tho! don’t get me wrong, they’re very gay and very funny and sometimes very sad/sweet, but in context they’re almost the least exciting part of the show - and I definitely don’t mean that as an insult, bc the highlight for me was absolutely the fantastic ensemble cast - really talented actors giving great performances of wonderful characters! they’re all so good! why have i mostly seen a million posts of blackbeard and blondcurls and occasionally sideburns?
Also, I know I just said the one thing it deserves more praise for is its ensemblyness so this is a bit hypocritical but you know who really deserves some more credit? Joel Fry
6 notes
·
View notes