Tumgik
#resonant youtube
perrysoup · 17 days
Text
Slavic Magic please I am begging you
Hooded Horse I am begging you too
PLEASE LET ME PLAY MANOR LORDS! I HAVE WAITED SO LONG! It's filling a niche that I haven't been able to satisfy for 2 decades.
PLEASE!
Anyway if you haven't already, look at Manor Lords and Wishlist it if it interests you.
Store Page:
AMAZING video by Resonant about it:
youtube
Resonant's Channel as well:
1 note · View note
skybristle · 25 days
Text
RBS > LIKES [tags appreciated!]
youtube
I DID IT. I FUCKING DID IT. im genuinely so proud of this its crazy. please please please give it your time this was a monumental effort!!!!
if anything in here intrigues you.... or you'd like to know the meaning/my thoughts.... my askbox is open :3
204 notes · View notes
sylvaur · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Mercy/Moira/Echo fusions, Overwatch 2 skins edition👼🧬🕊️
thank you steven universe thank you pokemon fandom for the chronic fusion brainworms!
anyway i still have this old video detailing Resonance’s abilities, although it uses her old kit and body style. the voice and sfx still hold up though!
318 notes · View notes
bachelor-buttons · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
so i watched elisabeth
47 notes · View notes
thetruemek · 5 months
Text
*goes to audible dot com slash REPENT HARLEQUIN to enter a coma and escape this madness*
59 notes · View notes
darkersolstice · 4 months
Text
Is it part of my Autism Package™ that I really like post-mortems? Like, for large events, I want to break down and talk over the good, the bad and the ugly, and until I've done so, I won't feel complete in the experience.
Perhaps for similar reasons, I really like videos and podcasts about disasters. Air disasters, engineering failures, nuclear contamination events, scams and swindles. If you want to sit me down for an hour and talk about a situation and what the points of failure were that led to it, I will be happy as a pig in shit.
It isn't necessarily that such things are a special interest, it's the type of information that really makes me happy. The best air disaster podcasts take an eye to the findings and the 'how was aviation changed for the better after this?', and like. I want the same for events in my real life. I want conventions to be improved year on year based on observations and feedback and collected knowledge about points of failure. I want The Big Work Events to improve and to talk about where the pain points are.
Sometimes people see me as a negative person for really wanting to chew on things like that, though.
48 notes · View notes
kindaorangey · 3 months
Text
on the note of the ark doing a cover of lying is the most fun a girl can have without taking her clothes off live, jimmy would introduce the song by saying, "has anyone in the audience been cheated on?" then, "is anybody in the audience a former panic at the disco fan?" then, "this song is dedicated to love that crashes, burns, and turns itself into resentment."
30 notes · View notes
fourteenfifteen · 9 months
Text
when i see people going around complaining about the media they consume 9 times out of 10 i’m thinking “please please get into more independently produced work” esp when it’s things like mass media trends or corporate interests or things that seem like they’re made for sanitized mainstream interests like yes those are all annoying but yk what has less of those… yk what has the marginalized focus and the earnestness and the experimentation that you say you want… that’s right. it’s art made by random nobodies
60 notes · View notes
mourningmaybells · 5 months
Text
it's the recovering catholic in me that gets so mad that The Exorcist broke the ceiling for Horror Movies in terms of getting accolades, but I don't know who else could have done it. Like anything too scary gets an x-rating and so cant get awarded anything. Plus running off the heels of The French Connection meant that just having Friedkin made it more respectable than usual... anyways this was a segway. Look at this stupid pamphlet. academy award nominations where burstyn, blair and miller got snubbed for size
Tumblr media Tumblr media
youtube
also the wicker man came out the same year... 1973 shoulda been his year.
14 notes · View notes
dezy995 · 4 months
Text
I drew these doodles based off of the video Gordon’s adventure!! I really liked the first episode and I hope more comes out eventually:P
Tumblr media
Here’s the vid btw I think the creator should get more attention
Also I love how much of a menace he is
youtube
16 notes · View notes
iamthatwhich · 10 months
Text
youtube
Hi All,
If you deal with stress, anxiety, or anything like that, please consider giving this a listen.
I make guided meditations for a living; after doing ASMR for years I notice that ASMR may be catchier, trendier and more approachably noncommittal, but I really think actual guided meditation can help more (well, I more than just think that, it's scientifically supported) but a lot of people just don't think they connect with it, largely because spaces involving it don't tend to include them.
But as a nonbinary black Femme I want to offer these things from a lived experience and context that speaks to others like me---
so if you have a moment and an ounce of curiosity, please listen and if you like it, please subscribe to my channel and help my work grow.
Thanks.
52 notes · View notes
mejomonster · 3 months
Text
(The tldr is this is about gender and then versus now) I was listening to the podcast Enterprise Incidents on youtube. The Mudd's Women episode. The podcasters are 2 fans since the original airing, and I like them generally because they're really well informed in screenwriting and directing choices and so to some degree their analysis touches points I find a chunk of star trek type commentaries tend to miss: that optimisitc vision of the future, that star trek's goal was to be progressive but it also at times had flaws of its time (something Im painfully familiar with regarding Rick Berman and DS9 and TNG, so its nice hearing older watchers aware of those flaws from ToS). Now. Its not perfect. In my ideal podcast Id like to find some day (lol) a guy podcaster is capable of acknowledging the influence the spirk premise/fan perception had in some ways (from The Motion Picture thyla, that "i imagine love of men in that time" quote from Rodenberry, the Asimov suggestion to make them a team to help Kirk be accepted more by audience and Spocks individual popularity tying to Kirk was partly a bid to link their popularity). And I dont know that for all the great ideas they have, that they have any idea of the spirk fandom perception (like that quote in academia about slash fiction being the end of the Wrath of Khan if the glass were removed) or how the canon goal of making a duo unit at least created the dynamic that led to that fandom interpretation. But they do touch on many a good thing some less layer-looking people miss. They notice Kirk's actual personality (should be easy but often failed due to cultural perception versus The Show itself), Nimoys acting choices and spocks development into the character he became, the show itself deciding its identity over time and its ventures in various angles until then, what worked and what didnt regarding the progressive future versus the biases of the time it was made. They miss some nuance but theyre doing really in depth so its a treasure trove overall.
Now in Mudds Women, they miss some nuance of a story about beauty and worth that I think... i dont know. I think yeah the writers failed to hit the goal story meant to be told, but i also think outside a women perspective it can often be a miss in such storytelling (yoko taro doing the Singer in Nier Automata is the first time a guy telling a raw story about beauty and its impossible standards, invasive toxic expectations, and self destructive pressures, managed to feel totally on point and realistically managed). So i sort of yeah expect mudds women to need to be viewed Generously to grasp the message, and i sort of yeah expected guy podcasters to at best recognize where the story failed (which they did) but unfortunately not realize all the story was aiming to do (because it does Approach many topics i feel women and beauty standards and ppl who grew up in certain enviornments would recognize as Trying to be a reference to a real problem - the episode does say a fair bit if ur used to looking for those points, but not Super well done so i can see why an audience less used to relating to such points would notice them much less).
But the podcast said something this episode i found so refreshing. They mention how mudd explains how the venus drug works: it makes you "more of what you are" makes men more strong and aggressive, women more soft and feminine. Basically its a line about idealized traditional gender roles when ToS was made. And the podcaster mentions yes as a teen first watching (when we probably most feel a pressure to fit in, still most likely to believe society expects us to meet it and rewards that standard) it sounded like the drug made u better. But that in the life he lived, with the family he had, he had never been raised to think he had to be strong or women had to cook or any of that strict expectations. Then they talk about how the discussion of gender has grown so much in these years, and trans people of course can live more openly, and they say the question in society is like what does it mean to be a certain gender anyway.
And the guy says. Well i always thought and strongly think, when i say im a man, it means nothing. Because a man can be anything. Anyone can be any way, like any things, do any things, look any way. Being a certain gender means nothing beyond "im that gender."
And god how refreshing that was.
Growing up, in the 90s, yeah i felt to some degree those gender roles and expectations somewhat pushed as a teen: when girls start being pressured to wear makeup (by ads, movies, peers, trying to please crushes, avoid insults etc) and boys start being pressured to be strong (bullied for not being, attacked for being perceived as less strong by any number of reasons they get singled out by peers, movies and ads telling them their lack of strength is their reason for any failures etc). But like. There was ALSO a big push growing up, that i saw, of girls can do anything. Girls can cook or do construction, can wear dresses or play sports, can wear makeup or none at all, can have long hair or chop it off, can go into STEM or childcare, can marry or never marry, can be the career head of home or a stay at home parent, basically: anything, all of that or none of it or anyrhing in between. That was the direction of progress anyway. Guys were a bit behind (and oh of course bullying with their own peers limited their options of what wasnt ostracized) but we were seeing more acceptance of intelligence as equally desireable and acceptable to strength (at least for adult men), more media glorifying the nerds, more examples of a bigger variety of men with more niches that could still be considered ideals. And the result of that in some ways was good, i saw more guys my generation more accepting of their love of painting, cooking, wearing makeup, more guys who didnt body shame themselves as much, who didnt feel belittle themselves if they were stay at home dads or made less income, more who talked about their emotions than my parents generation ever did, more genuine friendships than we ever saw during toxic-teenage-pit when the strict standards weighed heaviest. The ideas were moving toward what is a man? Anything he wants. What is a woman? Anything she wants. What is a person? Anything they want to be. What is your gender? Whatever you feel it is. And it doesnt need to match up to Any preconcieved notions or box to be "justified" because no gender has specific strict traits it must include. Yes we still knew society had "ideals" for genders that it pushed, and that traditional and conservative thinking people held themselves to. But for people in general? What is your gender? What I feel I am. What must you do to Be that gender? Nothing. Anyone can be anything as any gender.
And god it was so refreshing hearing someone say that again. What does being a man mean? Nothing. Because a man can be anything. Anyone can be anything. Theres no box a person fits into, no box of traits any gender must conform to in order to be valid. A person can be anything and do anything and have any traits interests looks, and be whatever gender they are.
I dont know if its the way the worlds medias been shifting (so opinions we get stuck hearing more of), or cause i see trans people so often expected by society to conform to those stricter gender ideals with this weight of threat and isolation if someone in the majority finds reasons to attack (but in the end they always might, the whole thing is theyre fucked for attacking to begin with). But its like. God i miss when gender meant in my head only: what am i? What do i feel good calling myself? What feels like home. Cause im me, and me is not changing to appease some strangers. (Though i am to some degree, we all do even cis people do, because those stupid old ideals are widespread enough all ppl face some punishment or threat if they deviate from the strict boxes, despite no one fully fitting them). But like. If im me and i can do anything, what feels like home? Thats all it is to me. I miss seeing it that way. I miss when i didnt see quite so much of the looming strict standard pushing so hard on everyone to conform more. To try and force all people to cut themselves down and confine themselves to roles that serve what anyway besides littling all of us, oppressing all of us in limitation. (I mean. I know why it spreads. Maybe conservative voices are louder now about their ideal gender roles then when i grew up, or maybe its louder cause im an adult now. It doesnt mean they have any point.)
You are a person. You can be anything. Your gender is whatever you feel it is. Your gender does not inherently define your life and what you can do and be. Whatever forces we feel, remember whatever brings you joy is okay to be. Its okay to be you.
Like. Yes a person of a specific gender can define it very specifically in what that gender means TO them. How They define it for themselves. But that definition isnt universal and there is no limit to the definition of what a specific gender's people can be. A woman can look any way have any life any interest any traits any values. You can't define a woman as specific things and not others, a woman is as broadly defined as there are so many unique women in this world with so many varied unique experiences selves lives. Any gender is not universally always a confined list of traits, because theres all kinds of people with all kinds of traits of specific genders. What is a man, anything. What is a woman, anything. What is a nonbinary person, anything. A genderqueer person, anything. Any specific (or unspecific or undefined) gender person, anything. People are so varied they have too many unique traits to be always these X Y Z things and never these A B C things. Youre the gender you are cause its what feels right to you. But your definition of your own gender For u isnt universal to all people of your gender, cause people define their gender all kinds of different ways and people of your gender can have any traits in this whole spectrum of being alive.
This is the podcast btw:
youtube
And if you do know of a podcast that is aware of spirks influence on/from tos please send it my way.
8 notes · View notes
northern-passage · 2 years
Text
cw: mention of suicide
not sure how many of you are into traditional horror games (or more specifically the indie horror game scene)
and while i don’t usually play these games myself i enjoy watching playthrus on youtube and one of the games that circulated pretty recently was MADiSON, as well as martha is dead, and less recently was the blair witch.
all 3 of these games have 2 things in common: they are “psychological horror” and they all have suicide endings.
i hated all of these games. i think if i had to choose, martha is dead is the one i hate the most. but i don’t want to talk about that specifically (we’d be here all day)
it’s very obvious that there’s a trend towards “psychological horror” or as they call it in film for some reason, “elevated horror” and i think it’s fair to say that that’s true for IF as well. i don’t think that’s a bad thing, i like psychological horror, i don’t really have a preference to be quite honest; what i dislike, though, is the demonization of mental illness.
it’s always been a problem in the horror genre, but now i think it’s shifted slightly in a less direct way. i started thinking about this because i was watching a review about the blair witch project game, and she opens up the video talking about the ending, as well as MADiSON’s.
she made some really interesting points that i think are worth repeating. i know up until recently i had a “sanity” mechanic in tnp - it served a purpose, and it still does, but it never really needed to be labelled that way.
the reviewer even makes a comment about how mental health has been reduced to a “bleak soft magic system” - a game mechanic, a setting for people to play around in, a setting where bad things can happen for no reason other than it’s dark and edgy and shocking.
her criticism essentially boiled down to: mental illness isn’t your playground to experiment in, to spitball ideas for your horror game, it isn’t a toy you can pick up and play with. it’s not a game mechanic, it’s something that real people live with every single day. and that really resonated with me and put into words what i couldn’t.
tnp revolves around the hunter and their mental health - it’s an important part of their character, and impacts the way they interact with their companions and the wider world of the game, as well as how they deal with the rot. and with it being fantasy, it definitely blurs the line - is it magic? is it their imagination? is it the rot/their illness? was the hunter the killer all along?
mental illness can be scary. but it’s also manageable. it is not Thee Horror at the end of this book. and i think that’s important to remember when writing some of these horror stories. what is the point of mentioning this here, in this specific story - is it just for shock? is it just to imply and emphasize some imagined horror about the mentally ill? is it just to slap “dark themes” in the description, to grab the attention of some edgy readers? or is it actually serving a purpose in the narrative, offering something of substance beyond “mental illness scary”? beyond “dark and edgy” just for the sake of it?
here is the original video. i haven’t finished it, but the opening 10 minutes is where she discusses the trend of “suicide endings.”
it definitely made me pause and think about how i’ve approached things in tnp, and definitely made me regret not changing the humanity mechanic sooner.
112 notes · View notes
ligbi · 5 months
Text
Last week i was a little worried that one of my favorite youtubers skipped a full week of videos when she pretty consistently puts out one a week.
Tumblr media
Now i'm worried for her mental health because even with a buffer there's no way she got an almost 3 hour video out in 2(+?) weeks without losing it.
Anyway go watch her stuff it's always really good
youtube
Hoping to see Tokyo Godfathers from her soon since it's the season and Hana is...treated respectfully by the narrative if not so much by her friends
7 notes · View notes
kaeyazuha · 1 year
Text
GODS YES I'VE WAITED YEARS FOR THIS
youtube
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES EVERYTHING I'VE WANTED HAS COME TRUE FOR HIM YES
The emotion, the vulnerability, all while being completely livid and angry, it's perfect! I love who the Wanderer represents, I love everything about it- I know a lot of people got angry about wanderer "blaming" the kid for dying, but honestly, that's one of the most realistic reactions I've seen.
"How dare you leave me here?"
"How could you die like this?"
"Why would you leave me?"
"Why would you do this to me?"
Getting angry at someone for dying is one of the most common coping mechanisms out there; I would know, as I've been there several times myself. In reality, you're not angry at the person, you're just upset.
Not only does he represent the more angry ways to cope, but Wanderer also represents overcoming your battles and living for yourself instead of for others. He also shows that "redemption" comes in many forms, not just becoming a hero.
But my favorite?
I think my favorite part watching his growth. How he struggles to find an identity, constantly picking new identities only to through each one out the window time and time again. I love how after all this, he's finally found something comfortable for him. I love how he's finally happy, at least as happy as he can be in the moment.
50 notes · View notes
ffxcvxvc · 1 month
Text
youtube
AGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HE DID IT AGAIN!!!
FUCK I love Hozier and his music.
3 notes · View notes