god I'm so fucking furious at the removal of Te Reo Māori names from organisations around Aotearoa. it's a complete non-issue, every organisation has the English name directly underneath the Māori name. I have never once as an English speaker been unable to understand what an organisation is for. Winston Peters, the Deputy Prime Minister, who is literally Māori himself, said “Te Papa is a historic name but tell me this waka kotahi, how many boats have you seen going down the road?”. Waka does not just mean canoe. it means vessel, and waka kotahi (the transport agency of Aotearoa) explains this VERY SIMPLY on their official website. waka kotahi means to travel together as one. Can you see how fucking upsetting this is. A Māori person in power who is in agreement about banning his own language, being so cocky about something that he does not even understand due to the suppression of the language of his people. It makes me sick. I've seen reports from Māori people all over Aotearoa speaking out about how upset and furious they are, how decades of progress have been undone in the fight to restore the rights of their people who have for so long been oppressed and have suffered the effects of colonisation. Please share this if you can, I hate knowing how few people will hear about this, I know there is so much injustice in the world right now and it is so exhausting, I know. I love you all, keep it up.
https://waateanews.com/2023/11/27/te-reo-public-service/
11K notes
·
View notes
Do you ever just sit there and think how colonialism still affects us so deeply in a way that we can't reverse because it's so ingrained in us and in our history that we just keep circling around it and repeating it with just some modifications, and how the oppressed are always the same and the oppressor always does the same things with just slightly bigger terms to make it seem as if they're not really doing harm, but in reality just correcting the "wrong". Yeah.
21 notes
·
View notes
I genuinely don't believe indigenous shld mean anything biological, its abt relationship to the land you're living on.
well hopefully no one is, in relation to human beings, intentionally using it to mean anything biological bc that would be very pre-1950s race science. but i think a lot of people (who are not indigenous) are still very uncritical about the romantic ideas they have about indigeneity & where they came from & what they imply. people seem to tolerate all kinds of ideas when cloaked in romanticism because theres a sense that it must be harmless, like most people would be unwilling to say that your personhood is defined by your genes or that people should all just go back to wherever their ancestors came from or that native white gentile europeans just Belong in europe more than anyone else does. but theyre very charmed by the idea that living in the same place your ancestors lived gives you some mystical relationship to the earth there and (especially for white colonisers in the US who crave a sense of identity) seek meaning in their genetic makeup or the lives of their great great grandparents on the basis that where they once lived conveys something meaningful to you (presumably in your genes), etc. but these ideas are still strongly implying the former things, just by people who dont really want to have to think about that because theyre enjoying a pastoral fantasy rather than intentionally trying to revive nazi ideology.
and like for example, i get what youre trying to say and i 100% agree; but i think saying 'relationship to the land you're living on' is still potentially problematic to me, because like if an indigenous person is displaced from that land they have a relationship to, do they stop being indigenous? and whilst i think saying a relationship to the earth in general in preferable (e.g when african americans and native americans were displaced to new and unfamiliar lands, they retained the same non-exploitative relationship with the earth and developed new indigenous knowledge of this place they were new to), but when indigenous people's traditional ways of life are threatened by colonialism and poverty and cultural genocide etc they're still indigenous. if an indigenous person is forced to move into a city and get a 9-5 at starbucks, or the earth-honouring beliefs&spirituality of their ancestors are forcibly replaced with colonial xtianity and permanently lost to history, they're still indigenous.
the way i've always seen it explained by indigenous people is as a relationship to colonialism & that is the one that's least romanticisable but creates the most coherent class of people: indigenous people are those whose right to live on the land they call home is threatened by a government which doesn't represent their community or respect the leadership it chooses for itself, whose language&religion&culture is being or has already been replaced by force, whose way of life is sanctioned or outright prohibited by a dominant culture that demands everyone live the same way, etc. if a group is experiencing these aspects of indigenous experience i see no reason to deny them resources and language on the basis that they dont have some kind of romantic noble savage mythology or something. lots of indigenous people are also dealing with huge loss & i think looking at a group whose language and traditions and way of life and so on HAVE been destroyed and then using a definition of indigenous that finishes the job and agrees they are no longer indigenous is very strange (this is not @ u though anon) & imo the fact of that loss IS a relationship to colonialism that makes one indigenous. never being able to learn the language your grandparents knew, specifically because it was taken from them against their will, is an indigenous experience regardless of what lifestyle or beliefs you as an individual practise.
i think we basically agree with eachother and im sure neither of us planned for my answer to be this long 😭 but i guess what im saying is that if u define indigeneity as a relationship to the land, but believe said relationship is inherited (and imagine vacuum from colonialism), is that not still in fact defining it biologically just without the discomfort of outright saying that
2 notes
·
View notes
What's new(ish) in the settler-colonial state of the US is that a series of bills have been passed in the House (the Baby Senate as I like to say) and are on their way to the Senate that make it harder to voice support for Palestinians while also making sure your direct taxes aid the genocide in Gaza.
These bills affirm the US's stance on the settler-colonial Zionist Entity and the implicit ties that the government has with Israel and really — just goes to show you how Israel is just one big base for American Imperialism.
Anyways, there's still time to call your senate and tell them that you don't want these bills that only further spiral the US into fascism so even if you think it might not do much — it's important that we document our dissent in official sources. And while you're at it — call your congressperson and tell them that if they voted for this you're not voting for them next election. If they voted against the bills, still call your congresspeople and tell them you support their decision to vote against these bills.
Here are the bills:
📍Resolution: HR 6126
Resolution Name: Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act
Description: Gives $14.3 Billion To Israel From The IRS (Taxes You Pay). Like straight up. Just takes it from an IRS project, which used our tax dollars to begin with, to give to Israel "defense."
Link to check summary: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/118/hr6126
📍Resolution: HR 798
Resolution Name: "Condemning the support of Hamas, Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations at institutions of higher education, which may lead to the creation of a hostile environment for Jewish students, faculty, and staff."
Description: Will Penalize Students On American College Campuses For Supporting Palestine. This includes "Free Palestine" Protests as according to Rep Owens who introduced the bill (Click).
Link to check who voted: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/118-2023/h578
📍Resolution: HR 3266
Resolution Name: "Tolerance in Palestinian Education Act"
Description: They will be examining Palestinian education materials to see if it promotes "hate" or "violence" (aka are they teaching their children to become murderers??). Will inevitably require Revision Of Text Books In Palestinian Schools To Portray The Occupation In A Positive Light.
Link to summary: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/118/hr3266
📍Resolution: HR 340
Resolution Name: "The Hamas International Financing Prevent Action"
Description: Claims to stop financial support for "terrorist" organizations but considering that Gaza's government is run by Hamas, then this would mean Gaza will receive absolutely no aid and donating to people in Gaza could get you in legal trouble.
Link to summary: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/118/hr340
There's a button for most of these bills that allows you to contact your representative directly. Please do take the time to contact them — while many of this isn't especially new to Palestinians, the difference is now that we have a larger power in numbers than we did in the past. Please make sure to advocate for you Palestinian comrades in the US whenever possible! Help us Free Palestine one step at a time!
15K notes
·
View notes
The IOF lies. It's inherently part of their zionist settler-colonial agenda -literally. They are not to be trusted -everything they say is meant to distort and distract people from what is really going on. This is just another example of this.
14K notes
·
View notes
finished reading thru The Hundred Years' War On Palestine: A History of Settler Colonial Conquest and Resistance by Rashid Khalidi and I cannot recommend it enough. A lot of people and, very likely, the average person not completely blinded by Islamophobia and/or USamerican/European/British exceptionalism are probably at least moderately sympathetic to the Palestinian cause but I don't know how many of us actually understand the degrees by which Israel is based in settler colonial ideology, how it has continually attempted to subjugate and ultimately eradicate the Palestinian people, and the degree by which the US and Britain (but mostly the US ever since the Six Day War in 1967) have been complicit in this continual genocide.
This book is an amazing comprehensive guide on understanding the conflict and I genuinely think you should give it a read (or listen) if you want to learn more. It is one thing to feel sympathy and to declare support for a cause, but I think it is important to take a step further and educate yourself more on it. A ploy I have seen frequently by zionists is to tell people to "educate themselves" before commenting on this genocide, hoping to instill doubt and encourage silence. Well, here is your chance to educate yourself! I'm obviously biased in favor of this one as it is the first major text on the Palestinian genocide that I have read, but I fully believe in its quality.
You can find this book online in PDF format or, if you prefer, you can purchase a physical copy from many of the large retail bookstores; Barnes & Noble in the US sells it, and so does Waterstones in the UK. There is also an official audiobook that you can either purchase through many of the major audiobook distributors (though I recommend avoiding Amazon if it can be helped), but you can also obtain it via other means if necessary. It's actually currently up on YouTube in its entirety, though I won't link it here in case it gets taken down. (It's really easy to search for, just type in the books title + 'audiobook' into your preferred search engine or on YouTube itself and you'll find it. It's about 10 hours long which is a reasonable length for an audiobook). I'll include a link in this post to an overview/lecture/dialogue with the author Rashid Khalidi on the contents of the book conducted at Brown University in 2020.
I do ask you read this book. I think a lot of people already are. I checked a couple of online libraries that have a limited number of audiobook copies that had all been checked out and that to me implies that people do want to educate themselves. There's a sizeable stack of these books at the local bookstore I ocassionally shop at, front and center on the table in the history and world affairs section. It's not hard to find. I hope you all have a good day or evening and I know that if we all take the time to educate ourselves further and approach this genocide with a deeper understanding, we may be able to do something about it. Emotional pleas are not enough, they must be informed ones as well.
14K notes
·
View notes