I get where people are coming from when they say Diaspro in Winx lost the plot for the sake of being turned into a minor villain and that's all once Valtor enabled her to do what she did in S3, but I feel like that was a reasonable narrative choice. It's only a love potion at that point (while I could go on all day about the ethics of love potions, of course, a later season has her straight up trying to do direct murder). She's a noble, guards will do her dirty work, and I understand that she would feel like getting revenge on Bloom while getting back together with Sky. She was promised a position — romantic AND political — she nearly had and then it was taken from under her by a random fairy who wasn't even "supposed" to be in the running. I don't think what she did was nice, but it makes sense for the story and for her character for her to want to reclaim her position in the way she did. Sky's love was an accessory, in part, to her political ascension, and thus he is again rendered accessory and accomplice by the love spell. And, sending guards after threats seems to be the thing to do in the magical universe if you're a disgruntled noble, so it's probably not unfamiliar for Diaspro to have seen occur before or want to do. It's not a uniquely rotten response any more than Radius' behaviour towards the monster (who, he didn't know it, was Stella). If we fault her for this action rather than only the intention behind it, we need to examine how the worlds in Winx Club deal with threats to their monarchs in general, which sounds interesting but I frankly don't have time for tonight. Diaspro did wrong, but she didn't do uniquely wrong there, and Eraklyon has the punitive security structures in place to have enabled that.
Diaspro's later appearances seem to flatten her motives and the symbolism behind why her relationship with Sky was important and what she does about it (who cares what Diaspro's political aims are and how her status might reflect how she deals with problems, the audience needs to see Bloom thrown into fire I guess), but I feel like seasons 4-8 weren't really that good anyway, so I can't even claim this as a fault of the writers doing Diaspro specifically wrong instead of them just doing the whole show wrong at that point. It might be related, and it might be a coincidence, but a lot of the writing choices seemed to become more flat to me right around when the art shifted to that lifeless godawful Flash simulacrum of S1-3's art.
Also like... idk but if some long-haired hottie wizard in a sick coat and contemplative eyeshadow told me he could help me get my promised chance at both romantic and political success back, I'd at least hear him out, yknow, see what he had to say (<- don't trust me I simp for Valtor)
51 notes
·
View notes
find it so so funny that everyone seems to want united to win this weekend because they don’t want chelsea to win any trophies… except for united fans… because we don’t want skinner to win anything
17 notes
·
View notes
it's kind of wild that jessie gender used the word transandrophobia in a youtube video. i've never seen that happen before. people gotchaing you know who for blatantly misgendering rebecca sugar and nate stevenson was the most callout of actual transmasc or afab transneutral erasure i've seen from the video essay space in memory, and even that was mostly just to pad out the callout post
10 notes
·
View notes
normal people support female separatism <3
11 notes
·
View notes
haven’t even started my new job in rare books yet and already i am being asked to join private clubs for bibliophiles. this is both deeply hilarious AND everything i’ve ever wanted out of life
6 notes
·
View notes
White feminism exists to retool progressive language in service of white supremacy
7 notes
·
View notes
sometimes I wonder if I should take a gender studies class just so I can bitch every day about how an imaginary boyfriend is often seen as a requirement for a woman to feel safe enough to have fun at a club, or the idea that an imaginary person with a fake “claim” over me has more influence over predatory men than my own voice saying “No, I’m not interested, get lost”
3 notes
·
View notes
I think it’s fascinating how discussions on “antimasculism” are almost entirely reliant on denying the existence of conservative men (or even just deeply misogynistic men) and the role they play in perpetuating patriarchy—because the goal is not to uncover the roots of these issues (that would mean holding men responsible for their actions) the goal is to redirect axis of oppression.
Like was Donald Trump “antimasculine” when he said women shouldn’t be in the military because their male counterparts raping them would be “inevitable” ? Does he think femininity is superior, genuinely?
So much of rape culture specifically is men arguing that they are “naturally” predatory in order to justify their violence towards women—which isn’t true. But it’s the argument they’ve been trying to make for literally centuries because they benefit from it, not because society holds women and femininity in higher regard. Do the men who perpetuate this rhetoric hate men and masculinity? No.
This argument is particularly insane because (ignoring the fact that black and brown men face unprovoked violence on the basis of their race, not their masculinity) who is inacting violence against them? Like are the police who kill black men feminine? Are the white supremacists?
The fascist who target black and brown men with violence are the same ones who who label men as “naturally predatory”, all while lament the idea that leftists are “attacking”, masculinity or “feminizing” men. These are masculine men perpetuating this, but “antimasculism” or any other form of MRA rhetoric relies on the idea that men are hapless victims of Society™️ so they generally refuse to a knowledge when men themselves perpetuate this rhetoric.
They look at racism and misogyny and transphobia and homophobia and think “this is feminists fault!” like it’s literally insane. Women are (and should be) held responsible for the ways in which they enforce misogyny & patriarchal standards on other women, but the common denominator (besides antifeminism + misogyny) between all breeds of MRA rhetoric is the idea that men can’t/shouldn’t be held responsible for the roles they play in enforcing patriarchy because “it’s not their fault, it’s Society™️”, and in turn they have to almost completely ignore the men who loudly and proudly embrace the misogynistic, patriarchal rhetoric MRAs are trying to rebrand as “antimasculism”, because acknowledging these men shatters their entire argument.
15 notes
·
View notes
I really wish I was allowed to love women.
5 notes
·
View notes
people when men punch holes in walls and make hundreds of stories about intense violence and toxic masculinity:
people when a teenage girl enjoys tomie a bit too much: OMG everyone nowadays romanticizes mental illness for women and wallowing in self pity!!
49 notes
·
View notes
Missouri Republicans are trying to classify any place that hosts drag performances as sexually oriented businesses. why
9 notes
·
View notes
I studied politics for 6 years so that I can answer my brother question about why Oppenheimer needed that security clearance hashtag ididsomethingwithmydegree
3 notes
·
View notes
ppl in america really be suing for the pettiest/shittiest reasons ever lmao
5 notes
·
View notes
Ok what is UP w Scotty’s love life??
First we have Who Mourns for Adonais, where my boy just throws himself at a god willy nilly for poaching his girl, and Kirk has to remind him to be professional several times.
Then in Wolf in the Fold, we get this from McCoy:
“Don’t forget, the explosion that threw Scotty against the bulkhead was caused by a woman. […] Matter of fact, considerable psychological damage could have been caused. For example, his total resentment toward women.”
First of all, wtf. A girl causes an explosion and you come to hate all girls??? My dude??? Even saying it’s due to head injury is a bit much, I don’t see traffic accident victims coming to hate all cars? And the prescription is to hang out with girls until you stop hating them??? What kind of 60s sexism is this???
Then The Lights of Zetar opens with Kirk saying:
“When a man of Scott’s year falls in love, the loneliness of his life is suddenly revealed to him. His whole heart once throbbed only to the ship’s engines, he could only talk to the ship. Now he can see nothing but the woman.”
So the takeaway here is:
1/ Kirk and McCoy are very concerned about Scotty’s personal life. Not only because they’re his friends, but also because he’s vital to the ship’s operations and
2/ He’s a fucking powder keg, and it’s somewhat to do with his age. Devoting 2/3 of his life to a ship leaves him pretty immature romantically. Even if the hatred in Wolf was caused by a concussion, his behavior elsewhere demonstrates that he gets so intense about love that he forgets self-preservation, sound judgement and his usual sense of duty.
No wonder these two have to babysit him. My man goes 0 to 60 in 3.5. He’s very sweet to his love interests, yes, but his total devotion makes him a liability.
1 note
·
View note
absolutely no one asked for my album ranking but here it is anyway
1. satellite: this is subject to change but it’s the one that is most likely to get stuck in my head. the production on this track is fucking nuts. i love how dynamic it is
2. late night talking: a very close second spot, but it actually tied for first. it’s really just a fucking banger
3. daylight: it’s cute! fun! very earnest in his signature boyish way
4. music for a sushi restaurant: as my sister described it ‘a glee/pitch perfect wet dream’ that i do not disagree with but am also somehow not bothered by. again, it’s fun and light and a little nonsensical a la watermelon sugar
5. as it was: i can’t tell if i just have stockholm syndrome or not bc this song is literally fucking everywhere, including very obscure targeted ads, BUT it’s warranted bc it’s a bop
6. grapejuice: not really standout for me but it’s tolerable to have on in the background while doing stuff
7. boyfriends: i don’t care to try and parse out what perspective he’s singing from bc i think that angle is fucking boring and some of u need to relax but his voice sounds nice and the harmonies are good
8. daydreaming: has the vibe of a song i might have heard in a forever 21 circa 2015 while desperately trying to find any article of clothing that didn’t have awful screenprinted phrases or studs on it. overall does not do it for me at all
9. cinema: a bit heavy handed in the miss swift 1989 ‘james dean daydream look in your eye’ style. unlike daylight, this song lacks his vaguely depraved desperation that we have heard in songs like adore you and only angel and instead get the absolute lame ass “do you think im cool?” pick me boy nonsense. i am bitter and im allowed to be a bitch about it
10. matilda: idk who matilda is and im sorry the situation being discussed is quite a bummer, but this song simply is not my cup of tea. im also not a huge fan of people airing out other peoples childhood trauma for their own gain cough ed sheeran cough
11. love of my life: i have listened to it exactly once and that was enough. i cannot even begin to tell you what this song might sound like from memory
12.
13.
two tracks i will not even mention by name bc the lyrics make me feel violent and i think he needs to spend some time in like….detention. or be sent to the fucking moon bc jfc
8 notes
·
View notes
I’m still mad about something that happened on tiktok last week and I want to do a post about it and explain an aspect of transphobia I’ve observed.
A cis user made a video asking that trans people share more banger music that they make, but clarified saying “by trans people, I mean trans women” because trans men only make that “sad ukulele” music. There was much discourse, he doubled down and said trans men couldn’t take a joke, other trans people threw the offended transmascs under the bus, or insisted that they can also make club music, yada yada.
I want to know if the queers who haven’t been queer as long as I have know that this exact drama was had with gays and lesbians. Do you know that some transphobia is repackaged homophobia and lesbophobia? I feel like that’s something we should be allowed to say and examine without someone shutting you down and insisting you’re conflating the gays and transes.
But yeah, for decades the joke has been that gay men are the fun flamboyant ones that make good art and dance music, and that lesbians are angry and dress ugly and make sad folk music. It’s pretty much an identical bias and resulting disrespectful jokes.
And it’s shit! I’m not going to let anyone, let alone a cis person, get away with transphobia just because it’s directed at trans men. It’s rude and harmful to devalue our art, and our art doesn’t need to be easily consumable to you. We’re allowed to be pissed and offended when you write us off, minimize the harm you’ve done, and exclude us from the conversation. It’s obvious when you only tolerate the queers who can serve you, and that you don’t actually care to listen or learn about our lives, struggles, and art.
5K notes
·
View notes