Based on specimens previously identified as Tropidostoma, a new taxon of dicynodont (Bulbasaurus phylloxyron gen. et sp. nov.) from the Karoo Basin of South Africa is described.
(Kammerer & Smith, 2017)
Submitter comment: “ I see what you did there[.]”
Also the species name translates to “leaf razor”! While the paper doesn’t spell out the Pokémon connection, the first author is on record saying, “similarities between this species and certain other squat, tusked quadrupeds may not be entirely coincidental.” And in a series of now deleted tweets, he said “OR WAS IT?” in response to “It was not named after the Pokemon.” and “Also, did you note the species name?” in response to “No, not named after the #pokemon Bulbasaur!”—Ed.
558 notes
·
View notes
There’s a dinosaur named Sauron, a Dicynodont named Bulbasaurus phylloxyron (leaf razor), a Pterosaur named Aerodactyl, an Ankylosaur named Zuul, a Trilobite named Han solo, an extinct Sea Cucumber named Cthulhu.
Exhibit A (This is relevant and very important to the ask)
Exhibit B (supports Exhibit A)
18 notes
·
View notes
Pokemon Re-Typed: Bulbasaur Line
The original grass starter - Bulbasaur and its evolutions are also, like most of the Gen I grass types, half poison. Conceptually, the whole line has sort of looked a bit frog-like to me, especially those ‘ears’, the lack of a tail and Venusaur, in particular, has all these wart-like bumps.
And for their type I got...
So, I gotta be honest, before I even got to the ‘maybe I could blog this’ stage I had tried out generating a type for Bulbasaur just for fun. So I have had a bit more time to think of this then I probably will going forward.
Anyway - my initial gut thought was of succulent rock plants - succulents are a pretty common sight and topic of conversation in the Western Cape of South Africa where I live
However, I began to feel like such an addition would better benefit a Rock-type form of Bulbasaur. I drifted on to deserts, which in many Pokemon games are the main location for ground types, and thinking of plants in deserts one immediately thinks of cacti.
However, I didn’t really like this idea. Cacti still seem like more grass type than ground type to me. Even the actual cactus Pokemon, Cacnea, and Maractus are pure grass types. So I thought of the other main location in the games you find Ground type Pokemon - caves.
Plants don’t exactly thrive in caves, so I began to think about what a Bulbasaur without its bulb would look like. After all, their Pokedex entries normally make it seem like the plant is attached to Bulbasaur after it is born (I know all Pokemon are hatched from eggs in their basic or baby stage practically identical to the others of their kind, but I view that as a mechanic rather than a representation of reality). So, what if in some region a group of the Bulbasaur-line adapted to a life in caves, giving up their symbiotic relationship to plants altogether.
While I do think Bulbasaur are frog-like, the ‘saur’ part of their name and certain features also call to mind some of the so-called ‘mammal-like reptiles or ‘Therapsids’. Indeed, recently there even was a Dicynodont discovered that was named Bulbasaurus.
Having worked in the Natural history museum recently where its skull was on display, I am aware that there is some vehement denial that it was named after a cartoon monster and instead named for its bulbous nose. Still, I remain aware that there is a trilobite called Han solo and that this particular species was called Bulbasaurus phylloxyron with phylloxyron meaning ‘leaf razor‘ WHICH TOTALLY DOES NOT REMIND ME OF ANYTHING ELSE...
Anyway, why I bring this up is because certain Dicynodonts were burrowing animals. Bulbasaur and its line certainly do bear some resemblance to Dicynodonts - especially looking at Ivysaur’s projecting teeth and the beak-like shape of Bulbasaur and Ivysaurs mouth.
So, Subterranean form Bulbasaur is a pure ground type - they never bond with a plant and, lacking the defensive poisons and abilities of this plant, become timider, nocturnal creatures that hide in burrows or caves during the day, emerging at night to forage.
While I considered Bulbasaur growing large front teeth like Ivysaurs to resemble the burrowing teeth of a mole-rat...
... Ultimately I decided that subterranean form Bulbasaur is mostly unchanged. it lacks a plant on its back, having instead a flat back making its overall posture lower to the ground. Its front legs are slightly larger than a normal Bulbasaur’s, with more noticeable claws, to help it dig. Its color is duller than regular Bulbasaur - moving towards a paler skin. Its eyes are smaller as well, but to compensate its nose has become swollen like Bulbasaurus to sniff out food at night and underground.
For subterranean form Ivysaur, I thought of another Therapsid group - Gorgonopsia
Ivysaur already has those projecting teeth. Subterranean Ivysaur has longer teeth. Still pure ground type, these Ivysaur have become purely cave-dwellers. Their eyes have shrunk to almost nothingness, but their nostril bulb has become even larger. Subterranean Ivysaur, without a plant on its back, still has a flat-profile but also has longer, straighter-legs. It’s a fast hunter that chases prey through the dark caverns beneath the world in packs. Its pigment has almost entirely faded, leaving it a dull gray in color.
When subterranean Ivysaur become Venusaur, they become quite the opposite to agile hunters and become massive ambush predators - again with Venusaur being the most frog-like of the group although in this case, I’m thinking of a particular one
I imagine subterranean Venusaur being like a cave-dwelling Suriname Toad. Its eyes have completely vanished, and its head it little more than a massive mouth and nostrils. Subterranean Venusaur buries itself in the sand of the cave floor with only its swollen nostrils projecting. When it smells prey, it lunges forward suddenly and engulfs it in its huge mouth. Although definitely the largest and heaviest of its line, it would also be extremely flat to hunt this way. At this point, its pigment, like its eyes, is completely gone leaving it a ghostly white like most cave-dwellers
But, what about Mega Venusaur?
Well, Trypophobes may want to look away for this bit, but seeing as I did mostly base subterranean Venusaur off of a Suriname toad, there is a particular thing that toad is famous for besides its flatness...
Suriname toad eggs are embedded on the female’s back by the male. Over time, the eggs sink into the skin on the toad’s back - where they develop and eventually hatch as tiny toadlets. There’s a lot of videos on this if you’re curious :).
For Mega Venusaur, however, this process has nothing to do with reproduction. Rather, when exposed to its mega-stone, a part of subterranean Venusaur ‘remembers’ its ancestral practice of carrying a flower on its back. On the skin on its back erupts into hundreds of ghostly, luminescent plant tendrils - literal ‘ghosts’ of the plants that could have been
At this point, Mega Venusaur gains the Ghost type - becoming a ground/ghost Pokemon as long as it is Mega evolved.
In general, I like the idea of these alternate form megas not quite working as the mega-stone is meant to work with their ‘original’ form, but we’ll see as we go on...
I’m not too knowledgeable on balancing or changing stats and abilities in Pokemon, but to give a general idea: all the subterranean Bulbasaur forms will no longer learn grass or poison moves - instead learning ground and probably rock type moves. They would lose OVergrowth/Chlorophyll and gain something like Sand Veil. I wish Illuminate was a better ability as it would be perfect for Mega Venusaur’s ghostly plants - perhaps some version of that ability that had an effect. Stats wise, I can’t see these Pokemon being too different - perhaps physically tougher with higher ATK and DEF and lower SP. ATK and Sp. DEF and subterranean Ivysaur probably would be faster than regular Ivysaur.
Which brings us to the end of my first post in this series. I hope it was at least entertaining and, if somehow, this inspires you to try to draw what these subterranean forms would look like, I would love to see what you come up with.
Otherwise, check-in hopefully this time tomorrow and I'll move on to the next evolutionary line - Charmander's
5 notes
·
View notes
So a new dicynodont has been described, with the name Bulbasaurus phylloxyron! The official etymology states it was named after it’s bulbous head protuberance, rather than the squat dicynodont-like pokémon we all know and love.
... However, the author of this paper, Christian Kammerer, has hinted on Twitter that the pokémon reference may not be unintentional at all.
After seeing this post, I had a look, and the species name “phylloxyron“ turns out to mean “leaf razor” or something similar... Sneaky.
907 notes
·
View notes
Animals from this period were bizarre experimentations, with early ancestors evolving for some of the well-known groups still around today, like crocodiles, turtles and mammals.
Some of these include the dicynodonts, who despite looking more 'reptilian', are actually the precursors of early mammals. They were pretty weird looking, like a cross between a turtle and a wild boar.
Dicynodonts, mammals and all other animals more closely related to mammals than any other egg-laying animals are called 'synapsids', and a pretty important group. Even humans are synapsids, so dicynodonts are like our great, great, great (etc.) grand-cousins.
A new species of dicynodont has been described from the Karoo Basin of South Africa, which researchers have dubbed Bulbasaurus phylloxyron. Pokémon fans around the world rejoice! ...
218 notes
·
View notes