The Cracks in Good Damage
Diane Nguyen is one of the most complex characters on Bojack Horseman. Her journey both as someone overcoming a lifetime of trauma and as someone who wants to live by her creative passions take her through a process that many creatives relate to.
Yeah, but I’m not writing a book to have fun. If I don’t write my book of essays now, I never will.–Diane Nguyen, Bojack HorsemanIt is not often we find a character who so perfectly encapsulates the struggles of being a creative living with trauma and depression quite so thoroughly as Diane Nguyen from the Netflix series Bojack Horseman. Starting the series as a ghost writer, using her voice to…
View On WordPress
6 notes
·
View notes
i'm still emotional about all of spock's life trajectory basically being that of a pendulum wildly seeking equilibrium in a confusing world
he swings back and forth from emulating extreme logic to poorly hide his emotional instability as a kid to embracing emotion and even cracking jokes and laughing to once again valuing logic (but this time he lets himself still fuck with people and maybe his eyes show a fuck ton a glimpse of emotion if you know how to look for it) and then finally in the movies learning that emotion and logic are not conflicting forces and he embodies both and coaches others to do the same and just AUGH
168 notes
·
View notes
what got me so insanely angsty about the relationship between ludger and casey is that it's not even subtext. it's literally in the text that are their own words.
they canonically enjoy the other person's company.
they canonically believe the other person is one of a very few who could understand them.
they canonically understand each other, from personalities and capabilities to behaviors and thoughts.
ludger canonically regrets ruining their relationship.
casey canonically wishes to mend their relationship.
they canonically want(ed) this relationship.
11 notes
·
View notes
People mention Carrie being an autistic horror queen (she is) but I don't ever see anybody talk about May (2002)
20 notes
·
View notes
literally the catch 22 of making urself less to keep people around you directly leading to people leaving u bc you’re not opening up to them 🧍♀️
13 notes
·
View notes
i mean it really theres something so masc and sexy about a transmasc or butch or whatever you identify as that owns their softness their hardness their smoothness their roughness everything people think mascs "shouldnt" be and when they take that and theyre outspoken and confident about it especially (not required bc i will take just as much joy in building you up to feel that way yourself) but especially ESPECIALLY when they do what they do and they encourage others to do what they do too and not fit some toxic masculine energy. something so empowering to others about being yourself unapologetically it just makes me want to leap into your arms and call you the handsomest hunk i ever met
4 notes
·
View notes
Oh right I totally forgot that AD literally took lessons on how to drive a bus for his character as he didn't want to pretend he was doing anything or being distracted on how he "should look" operating a bus and mess up his lines because he'd end up over thinking the bus thing.
He deadass was like "screw it, I'm gonna learn how to drive a transit bus." and I think that's so cool??? Hi???
3 notes
·
View notes
11 notes
·
View notes
Giving sega the hardest glare rn for ANY kinda Pride themed cosmetic for Frontiers I'm on my knees cause imagine just like. That impact of that
im not expecting that but i feel like its not impossible either. put a rainbow cape on that beast
12 notes
·
View notes
Being Yourself in Public
Let's talk about going almost no-contact, ending a long-term relationship, being single and living alone. And what it means to actually upgrade your life.
“That’s not normal.”“You’ll never get a job like that.”“The nail that sticks out gets hammered down.”“No one will want to marry you if you look/behave/think like this.”
These are just some of the phrases that I and many others spent much of our youth hearing. That if we weren’t a very specific, highly consumable and curated version of ourselves, if we didn’t keep the part of ourselves that would…
View On WordPress
6 notes
·
View notes
writing a novel about ensign eli vanto and isb agent aleksander kallus having a fucked up “friends with benefits without the friendship” relationship back in the academy. what’re you up to
12 notes
·
View notes
i officially have the vampire chronicles brainworms bc i'm reading the vampire lestat rn and i keep thinking back to when the first trailer for the amc show came out and ppl were like "um......lestat only kills BAD ppl >:(" bc like......that's not true at all. yes, when he first gets turned, he's like i have to create a system for this or i'm going to lose my mind (which bads news bud you already lost it) and he only kills thieves and muggers and stuff. but then he has his mental breakdown in renaud's theater and says, and i quote:
"What sublime idiocy that I had dragged that paltry morality with me, striking down the damned ones—seeking to be saved in spite of it all? What had I thought I was, a righteous partner to the judges and executioners of Paris who strike down the poor for crimes that the rich commit every day?"
and then later that night he eats a beggar woman and her child while they're seeking shelter in a church (and trying to get him to a doctor bc he's covered in blood and they think he's injured) and says that their blood tastes better bc of their innocence. and then louis says in iwtv that lestat saw them (vampires) as beings akin to god who acted as independent agents doling out life and death at their own discretion. and this is something i find so fascinating about lestat as a character which is he is always constructing some sort of self mythology, some code or story about himself to define himself and then he carries it around until it begins to chafe and then he completely throws it away and recreates himself in hopes of eventually manufacturing an identity that makes his existence have some sort of meaning. bc that's really what he's looking for, a version of his story/life where everything is profound and nothing is simply (cruelly) by chance
11 notes
·
View notes
Just a quick poll because.
4 notes
·
View notes
I think no amount of acting in line with my morals will change the fact that I'm a fundamentally messed up person
2 notes
·
View notes
helloooooo i've had a blast talking to you more, you're genuinely so friendly and like that one time i said, you make me feel less scared to be myself. that thing where authenticity influences others positively
i think you've always had that vibe like before we were mutuals you used to spam like my posts (i was a little confused because we didn't follow eachother) but it always felt warm and i'm really grateful to know you now!! you're very cool and have many wonderful thoughts. thank uuu glad you're here :)
!!!!! This is so sweet waugh stop being so nice to me I'll cry /lh
But yeah samesies talking to you is very fun!!! I'm like. This close to falling asleep so this probably doesn't come over the way I intend it to but yeah I can only reciprocate that sentiment <33
2 notes
·
View notes
i really love and relate to how you’re able to praise and criticise bc obviously no one, even celebrities are perfect
Thank you! It's something I have kind of "cultivated" (there is no real right way here, just what I am comfortable with) over time because I am somebody who has a lot of sympathy for celebrities and their situation, simply because I engage with most things on a level of empathy for the individual, but I can also recognize that creating a persona and marketing yourself a certain way is part of their job and, as a result, am aware that I am not their friend and that there are situations where my sympathy might be exploited. Nevertheless, I just don't like to brush aside the negative sides of fame + since I am comfortable with the amount of energy and money (<- pretty much none) I spend on celebs, I just don't see why I should be overtly vigilant about the things that they tell me instead of trying to be empathetic because after all these are also regular humans. A general rule of thumb I have for criticism though is that I try to focus it on aspects of a celebrity that very clearly exist in a context of an exchange à la "money for goods", e.g. the quality of shows, the music, aesthetics (e.g. album art) – it is the only place where I understand a sense of entitlement because it is literally about the things you get for YOUR money.
5 notes
·
View notes