Tumgik
#VOTEBLUENOMATTERWHO
the-99-percenters · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
25 notes · View notes
crackerdaddy · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
I just voted! #ivoted #ivotedtoday #vote #voteblue #votebluetosaveamerica🇺🇸💙 #votebluenomatterwho #votingiscool #votingissexy #oakcliff #oakclifftx #happymonday (at Brewed LTD) https://www.instagram.com/p/CkGaB6Tuz0f/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
0 notes
read-marx-and-lenin · 15 days
Text
Trump: Illegals are murdering innocent Americans, we need to shut down the border immediately!
Liberals: OMG how dare this racist Republican make our glorious nation look bad! #VoteBlueNoMatterWho #DumpTrump #DonaldDrumpf #Covfefe
Biden: Illegals are murdering innocent Americans, we need to shut down the border immediately!
Liberals: Actually, if you leftists would look past your biases and purity tests, you would realize that Biden has to call them illegals and push for harsh border controls, because that's just politics! It's called compromise! Do you want Trump to win?
329 notes · View notes
yourtongzhihazel · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Gobsmackingly bad analogy for trying to push for votebluenomatterwho.
If the house is SHIT and ON FIRE, the solution is to TEAR IT DOWN AND BUILD A NEW FUCKING HOUSE
120 notes · View notes
monstergirlpurrs · 1 month
Text
genuinely we have to just start killing liberals, the votebluenomatterwho crowd deserve nothing less than deeply painful and cruel deaths.
10 notes · View notes
asm5129 · 2 months
Text
I hate how necessary it is that we vote for Biden, but it’s *so* necessary. If Trump gets re-elected and project 2025 gets started, best case scenario we face war. #VoteBlueNoMatterWho so we can still legally criticize our government
youtube
7 notes · View notes
greatkingpens · 5 months
Text
I have the same questions. I'd appreciate input
6 notes · View notes
gaydiation-poisoning · 2 months
Text
Imagine if you will, seeing someone being beaten to death with a stick. They beg you for help, to make them stop. The person beating them tells you there's another guy with a slightly bigger stick who'd start beating them if you didn't let them keep going.
You decide to let them continue, and as blood splatters on your face, you tell the victim to be thankful. After all, if you'd rejected their assailant that guy with a slightly bigger stick would have shown up. You helped them.
Now consider that there are thousands of you, all agreeing that the victim being beaten to death with a slightly smaller stick is better than the slightly bigger stick.
The idea of stopping the assailant is deemed too unrealistic.
This is what #Votebluenomatterwho 'harm reduction' looks like.
3 notes · View notes
angelsaxis · 5 months
Text
Liberal voice: all these things Biden is doing now? Trump is ALSO gonna do. So if you don't vote for Biden, you're going to continue to get the exact same thing. #VoteBlueNoMatterWho
6 notes · View notes
skeletalroses · 9 months
Text
“I’m punk, I just don’t like any punk things and I think punk people are too weird and aggressive. Of course I’m politically radical I #VoteBlueNoMatterWho”
5 notes · View notes
the-99-percenters · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
#BreakuptheDuopoly #voteindy #VoteBlueNoMatterWho #VoteIndyforPrez2024 #gop #Democrats https://www.instagram.com/p/Cg0en-OgGtc/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
2 notes · View notes
hellsite-yano · 2 years
Text
how are the #votebluenomatterwho people rn
16 notes · View notes
alanshemper · 1 year
Text
Criticizing Biden and the Democrats from the left is materially different from criticizing from the right, but #VoteBlueNoMatterWho liberals' brains shut down after "criticizing Biden and the Democrats".
"Oh so you must like Trump!" —something I had the recent displeasure of hearing unironically
(this is the functional purpose of Tucker Carlson, btw—to poison the well on certain topics of discussion for liberals)
2 notes · View notes
doorhine · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
shaftking · 6 months
Note
"biden supports genocide but you still need to vote foe him!"
That's how I know none of these people actually believe a genocide is happening. What, you rioted in the streets and destroyed entire communities during covid bc a few ppl got shot by police, but you won't do the same for this oh so horrific totally real genocide? Okay, yeah, bet.
These are largely the same people that #votebluenomatterwho every election, they have no principles, only good team good bad team bad. When someone on good team does bad thing, well, that’s simply not possible, because good team only do good thing.
It’s pretty mask off tbh that they would basically say that “genocide isn’t that bad when our guys do it.” They use words like genocide where there is none because they want emotional instigation, they want people to be enraged and politically turned on all the time. I hate to use that overused word, but it is quite fascistic. Nothing outside the state, everything is political. Etc etc.
0 notes
officialcreature · 9 months
Text
Journalism is so fucked in the US. Like the only good news sources are small time operations (at least compared to major news companies).
I just got thinking about it because of the "aliens are real" shit being reported on right now. Yes, some guy who worked for the air force said something about UFOs and "non-human biotics," but that's literally nothing!! Like this happens at least once a year at this point and nothing ever comes of it.
Non-human biotics means any organic matter that isn't fucking human. It could even mean human tissue that's contaminated or unable to be identified. Like, it literally in no way shape or form means aliens, but even major news sites are like "Aliens Real?!?! (NOT CLICKBAIT)(EMOTIONAL)!!! 😱😱😱"
Then the articles are just stating very blatant facts about what was said, but with no context. I think the OBSESSION with impartiality is one of the worst things to happen to journalism. Like I'm not saying I need everyone to be Fox News (cause fuck them), but in the event of something like a guy in a congressional hearing talking about UFOs comes up there should be context about the meaning of what he's saying and how fucking common this is and how it's never amounted to anything in the past.
Journalism needs to become more explanatory and less just blatant facts thrown out into the wind. Especially when you consider the average informational level of the general public. Like not to be full of myself, but I think the average person lacks a lot of knowledge on MOST subjects. Like watching people answer basic questions on anatomy, politics, geography, chemistry, etc., should make you see how giving context could be helpful.
For example, what good is an article/news story about a plastic recycling initiative if it doesn't give context on the viability of plastic recycling as a long term (or even short term) solution? Most people I've talked to don't know how most plastics aren't really recyclable (whether due to design/quality of the plastic or lack of infrastructure), plastic recycling has basically never been profitable (and thus sustainable in a capitalist system), and even high quality plastics can only be recycled once or twice at most before they breakdown too much to be used again. So if I write an article about the city spending money to put in bins to collect plastic around the city it may sound nice until you realize it's a waste of time due to the CONTEXT around recycling plastic. Like if the only things ever getting recycled are plastic bottles and some other specific plastics, and even a lot of those end up in landfills regardless of if you put them in the recycling, does it matter that much if the city is spending $1mill on a plastic recycling initiative. Well, it does, it just matters that they're wasting $1mill.
You'd never see the context though. CNN would just be like "The city of Houston is spending $1mill on a myriad of projects to increase plastic recycling city wide. The governor has called it, 'liberal nonsense.' Meanwhile city councilman Bob Bobberson said, 'The environment is the future #votebluenomatterwho.' A spokesman for Keep our Cities Trashy (which we won't give the context is run by big landfill) says, 'Actually ALL recycling is BAD for the environment and trash is good cause we cover it in dirt to make big hills and hills look nice.'"
Like obviously a bit satirical, but they'd really just run it like that devoid of context. Just boring facts and quotes without any attempt at truth telling. Plus, they'd throw in the governor's response despite the fact it has no bearing on the initiative at all and it's just basic culture war shit because it would help spur future clicks. PLUS, they'd even make no attempt at refuting the blatant lies from the pro-trash lobbyist or tell you who is paying for the group he's lobbying for.
0 notes